Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
I don't have much experience with bluegills,so I was wondering how big a 16 inch bluegill is considered? Thanks

Question by MB27. Uploaded on June 16, 2012

Answers (22)

Top Rated
All Answers
from FirstBubba wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

A 16" bluegill is a "whomper stomper! Take some pics and get him to a certified scale before he dries out!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

P.S. - Any grocery store with a scale! ...and get somebody to witness weighing and their name. Get the weight in writing! Good luck!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

Thanks,but it's a little too late for that.It was caught by a friend last summer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from captaind77 wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

Bubba's right, that would be the grandaddy of all bluegills. I've never caught one much bigger than my hand.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

There ain't no such animal.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

I could believe a 16-inch circumference.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 357 wrote 52 weeks 16 hours ago

a monster! i've never seen one that big!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dtbc333 wrote 52 weeks 14 hours ago

are you sure it was a bluegill?? if it was...WOW...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JustTakeMeHunting14 wrote 52 weeks 7 hours ago

thats called huge.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 52 weeks 5 hours ago

Just turn your ruler over from the centimeter scale and then re-read in inches.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 52 weeks 3 hours ago

Yep,it was a bluegill and it was that big.It broke the tip of his rod off when he caught it.He caught in a little pond where we live.There's not many in there,so I guess they get a chance to grow.Dad caught a little one the other day.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from deadeyedick wrote 52 weeks 3 hours ago

HUGE!!!!!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from deerhunterrick wrote 52 weeks 1 hour ago

16" Bluegill if measured after being run over by a steamroller would be considered smalless and quit thin. 10" alive would be pretty big 14" would be hugh, 16" would be a GIANT or a Bass wearing Bluegill skin in disquise

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 52 weeks 43 min ago

It is actually possible to have a sixteen inch bluegill, but not very likely. The world record for big bluegill caught on hook and line was set more than sixty years ago at around 4 pounds and 12 onces. It was mounted using the only blank available at the time that was simular enough to pass for the big bluegill, but that blank was 16 inches long and for a completely different species fish. But the real fish was at least an inch or more shorter than the blank according to what I have read. There have been reports of bluegill coming out of breeding ponds that where almost 1/2 pound heavier than the world record, but were not qualified as record fish because they were not caught on hook and line, and even being heavier than the world record, still were only about 15 inches. So it could be possible to have a 16 inch bluegill, but it probably would weigh much, more than five pounds and would be a new world record. World records for pan fish are mostly determined by weight.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Maybe I measured it wrong.I measured from the tip of it's tail to the tip of it's nose,not how thick it was.I think it was something like 1 and a half or 2 inches thick.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DEER30 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Huge! I once caught one that filled a 10" frying pan and thought I had something! Wow!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DEER30 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Isn't there someone in the south who was feeding bluegill a special diet at his fish hatchery and claims to have world record fish? Thought I saw that on the discovery channel or something? Maybe not?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from neuman23 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

The link isn't for a bluegill but is for a similar species...

www.gameandfishmag.com/2011/06/03/new-world-record-sunfish/

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

The records I looked up listed the top fish at 4 lbs plus but showed no length. The next best fish was 3 lbs 15 7/8 ozs. It gave a length of 15.75". The pictures I found were awesome showing 4 and 5 lb crappie!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bass bomber wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

That's a dinosaur! I caught one about a foot long when I was really little.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ncarl wrote 51 weeks 4 days ago

sure it wasn't hybridised.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red Salas wrote 44 weeks 6 days ago

Gigantic

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from santa wrote 52 weeks 5 hours ago

Just turn your ruler over from the centimeter scale and then re-read in inches.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

A 16" bluegill is a "whomper stomper! Take some pics and get him to a certified scale before he dries out!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

P.S. - Any grocery store with a scale! ...and get somebody to witness weighing and their name. Get the weight in writing! Good luck!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 52 weeks 18 hours ago

Thanks,but it's a little too late for that.It was caught by a friend last summer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from captaind77 wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

Bubba's right, that would be the grandaddy of all bluegills. I've never caught one much bigger than my hand.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

There ain't no such animal.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 52 weeks 17 hours ago

I could believe a 16-inch circumference.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 357 wrote 52 weeks 16 hours ago

a monster! i've never seen one that big!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dtbc333 wrote 52 weeks 14 hours ago

are you sure it was a bluegill?? if it was...WOW...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JustTakeMeHunting14 wrote 52 weeks 7 hours ago

thats called huge.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 52 weeks 3 hours ago

Yep,it was a bluegill and it was that big.It broke the tip of his rod off when he caught it.He caught in a little pond where we live.There's not many in there,so I guess they get a chance to grow.Dad caught a little one the other day.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from deadeyedick wrote 52 weeks 3 hours ago

HUGE!!!!!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from deerhunterrick wrote 52 weeks 1 hour ago

16" Bluegill if measured after being run over by a steamroller would be considered smalless and quit thin. 10" alive would be pretty big 14" would be hugh, 16" would be a GIANT or a Bass wearing Bluegill skin in disquise

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 52 weeks 43 min ago

It is actually possible to have a sixteen inch bluegill, but not very likely. The world record for big bluegill caught on hook and line was set more than sixty years ago at around 4 pounds and 12 onces. It was mounted using the only blank available at the time that was simular enough to pass for the big bluegill, but that blank was 16 inches long and for a completely different species fish. But the real fish was at least an inch or more shorter than the blank according to what I have read. There have been reports of bluegill coming out of breeding ponds that where almost 1/2 pound heavier than the world record, but were not qualified as record fish because they were not caught on hook and line, and even being heavier than the world record, still were only about 15 inches. So it could be possible to have a 16 inch bluegill, but it probably would weigh much, more than five pounds and would be a new world record. World records for pan fish are mostly determined by weight.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB27 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Maybe I measured it wrong.I measured from the tip of it's tail to the tip of it's nose,not how thick it was.I think it was something like 1 and a half or 2 inches thick.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DEER30 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Huge! I once caught one that filled a 10" frying pan and thought I had something! Wow!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DEER30 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

Isn't there someone in the south who was feeding bluegill a special diet at his fish hatchery and claims to have world record fish? Thought I saw that on the discovery channel or something? Maybe not?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from neuman23 wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

The link isn't for a bluegill but is for a similar species...

www.gameandfishmag.com/2011/06/03/new-world-record-sunfish/

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

The records I looked up listed the top fish at 4 lbs plus but showed no length. The next best fish was 3 lbs 15 7/8 ozs. It gave a length of 15.75". The pictures I found were awesome showing 4 and 5 lb crappie!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bass bomber wrote 51 weeks 6 days ago

That's a dinosaur! I caught one about a foot long when I was really little.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ncarl wrote 51 weeks 4 days ago

sure it wasn't hybridised.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red Salas wrote 44 weeks 6 days ago

Gigantic

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

bmxbiz-fs