Q:
The "Idle Iron Policy." In a hasty response to the 2010 oil spill, the government issued the "Idle Iron Policy" in October of 2010 ordering all non producing rigs and platforms in the Gulf of Mexico be plugged and any remaining structure be removed within five years. These strucutures have live coral growing on them and are critical marine habitat. These rigs are considered to be the largest artificial coral reefs in the world. Studies show that fish populations around the rigs are up to 60 percent higher. They are home to our federally protected redfish, the big breeders, and are a crucial asset in rebuilding the snapper numbers, not to mention the thousands of other benefits of live coral. As you read this, habitat is being destroyed in the Gulf at an alarming rate. We are doing irreparable damage. We can't damage the environment so badly with an oil spill, which killed, and is still killing, all kinds of coral and marine animals, and then in response destroy even more habitat. The government says that they are not destroying rigs with coral on them, but this is not true. For just one example google rig HI398. This rig has an established coral reef growing on it, and is slated for destruction. Please contact your congressman and tell him to support the "Rigs to Reefs" program. And to do it quick.
Question by redfishunter. Uploaded on June 27, 2012
Answers (4)
Idle oil rigs are a disaster waiting to happen. They are eaten away every day by the saltwater and eventually will become a hazard. Anything left out in the ocean that doesn't need to be there is always a hazard of some sort to shipping. The anchoring structure would, I believe, probably be left on the floor. I can't see how it could be removed. That should provide for quite a bit of habitat.
I am not an advocate of retaining artificial habitat in natural environments. Mother Nature is much more adept at monitoring natural environments than we are. We have created too much artificial habitat for North American geese and it is now to the point where the problem of overpopulatin is critical. If you have too much of a good thing, something is going to give somewhere. It's all about trying to keep a balance. I say we should do our best to put things in the Gulf back the way they were.
The iron might erode away over time, but this is irrelevant as coral is already growing on them. The GPS coordinates of these rigs are no secrets. They are also marked on maps. These are no hazards to shipping, assuming the Captain knows how to read a map. You might be right abouot not being able to destory the anchors and plugs. But that doesn't matter when the removal of the frame kills the coral growing on them. Also, the program our government established to rehabilitate the snapper numbers was written assuming that this structure would be here. Here is video of another rig that is set to be destroyed: www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sAYwCU-vvaM#!
This is actually a pretty smarty policy and it has nothing to do with coral, Big oils is being told to "use it or lose it". Keep it in the oil in the ground and only releasing when prices spike is market manipulation. If the well is not producing it should be shut down. If it can be plugged it can be cut off at the coral line leaving you coral happily growing. This is a red herring and I suspect BIG OIL market manipulation is behind it somewhere.
i think that we should all live underground and eat tofu for bruch every other sunday. o.e
Post an Answer
This is actually a pretty smarty policy and it has nothing to do with coral, Big oils is being told to "use it or lose it". Keep it in the oil in the ground and only releasing when prices spike is market manipulation. If the well is not producing it should be shut down. If it can be plugged it can be cut off at the coral line leaving you coral happily growing. This is a red herring and I suspect BIG OIL market manipulation is behind it somewhere.
Idle oil rigs are a disaster waiting to happen. They are eaten away every day by the saltwater and eventually will become a hazard. Anything left out in the ocean that doesn't need to be there is always a hazard of some sort to shipping. The anchoring structure would, I believe, probably be left on the floor. I can't see how it could be removed. That should provide for quite a bit of habitat.
I am not an advocate of retaining artificial habitat in natural environments. Mother Nature is much more adept at monitoring natural environments than we are. We have created too much artificial habitat for North American geese and it is now to the point where the problem of overpopulatin is critical. If you have too much of a good thing, something is going to give somewhere. It's all about trying to keep a balance. I say we should do our best to put things in the Gulf back the way they were.
The iron might erode away over time, but this is irrelevant as coral is already growing on them. The GPS coordinates of these rigs are no secrets. They are also marked on maps. These are no hazards to shipping, assuming the Captain knows how to read a map. You might be right abouot not being able to destory the anchors and plugs. But that doesn't matter when the removal of the frame kills the coral growing on them. Also, the program our government established to rehabilitate the snapper numbers was written assuming that this structure would be here. Here is video of another rig that is set to be destroyed: www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sAYwCU-vvaM#!
i think that we should all live underground and eat tofu for bruch every other sunday. o.e
Post an Answer