Q:
Thank GOD for people like Ed Snowden, the whistle blower that revealed the Government spy operation. Without people like him the Government would just keep going on and on. Some say the Government operations were illegal and that Congress approved a much less intrusive operation. Can Ed Snowden be tried for doing something illegal about something the Government was doing that is illegal?
Question by jhjimbo. Uploaded on June 10, 2013
Answers (36)
Eavesdropping is how they managed to get Bin Laden. As an American living outside the country using Verizon, I'm sure they have been peaking at my communications across the border quite a bit. No problem for me (and you guys thought I was a liberal!). I have nothing to hide and if it keeps you safe, the US govt can snoop away at my communications all they want.
Technically what this wayward administration is doing is legal under the Patriot Act, but our government never target ordinary Americans before. So what he did could get him a death penalty or life in prison. The reason why this has exploded into a big controversy is because this administration is using it for vast majority of the country and not using it in a targeted situation. There is no reason for them targeting me or you when everyone knows who the enemy is. Also this really got a lot of the media to open their eyes although they are still glazed over in a hypnotic trance. This guy did in my Libertarian side views expose an evil thing, but at the same time gave the enemy plenty of useful information. Regardless it got the public talking about it and considering their views on spying.
OntarioHonker,
The operation failed to catch the Boston bombers even after the Ruskies told us to watch them.
The CIA has been doing this for years from Arlington,VA but that was only international electronic communications. That was probably how they kept track of OBL, even after the press leaked we were listening to his calls. That was a Cray computer - fastest we had at the time. This operation in Utah is going to store a Terabite of info. The computers are so powerful they have 3 million gallons of cooling water to keep them running.
No thanks, I do not want such a pervasive Government working in the US. You do not mind because you are Canadian - different world there.
BTW, have you noticed the media is playing down the California shooter probably because is a Arib. Have you heard them say his name? not very often. Maybe he was one of the individual cells we are suppose to have living among us. 1,300 rounds of ammo - give me a break. He was in a mission. Then they showed a black powder revolver. What's up with that?
Dcast,
I have heard the spying sees a big increase in traffic just prior to a planned attack. I would guess they want to look at everyone's communications to get a base line of 'noise' so they can then spot any increase in activity, and key in on those communications.
Still, I am not in favor of collecting this data en-mass, which in the future could be used in any number of malicious ways.
Ten years ago I had 35 years in the communications industry. I can tell you the only difference between illegal and legal is can it be used in court. Even in the olden days of analogue service, collection was possible. Fast forward to today throw a computer in he mix and everybody gets nervous and jerky. Back in the old days the phone company had an amusing saying. You may have never had a Policeman in your house but you had a Phone man under your bed. [You know the the phone on the night stand].
PS; To put all this in prospective. Five months after 911 all the terrorists were granted Visa's albeit posthumously.
At what point do we, as Americans, stop giving up our freedoms in the name of safety?
"A man who gives up liberty for safety, deserves neither." T. Jefferson
Honk,
"...I have nothing to hide..."
Nor do I, therefore the Gov't had NO right to snoop around in my phone calls!
They're going after E-mail, too!
Just another "Enhanced" background check!
If I had a criminal record, I might expect it.
I'm not!
Just another reason they're out of line.
Yeah, Bubba, wouldn't it be nice if all the criminals and terrorists wore uniforms or walked around with placards identifying them as such. They don't. Like you, I'm also not a criminal or terrorist. I know that. But do you? Do you have a right to find out for sure if your family works in buildings or rides mass transit that makes them vulnerable to terrorist attacks? In a country where everyone is supposed to be legal under the law, I don't have a problem with everyone being suspects ... rather than no one. Sadly, after 9/11 our world changed. We need to accept it. To keep my grandson safe, I'm willing to live with less liberty. I don't like it but it is what it is. We're not living in the 18th century any more ... not even the 20th century. Having said that, I don't oppose vigilance either.
Jimbo, the government security agencies lost track of the Boston Marathon kooks because some idiot clerical person misspelled their names. Sh*t happens sometimes in spite of everyone's best efforts.
A little profiling would curtail the problem post haste.
You know, the same thing radical Islamics do.
"Are you Muslim?"
"No."
"Then you must convert to Islam or die."
But then, Muslims feel it's okay to lie if it promotes their religion.
FirstBubba I think there is a danger in taking a quote out of the it's context in history. Good old TJ thought nothing of sending the common man to fight against England because he was tired of paying taxes. He thought it was OK to subject his illegitimate children to a life of slavery. Women were little more than chattel. All these high ideals may not have meant what they mean today. One of my favorites was "If we loose this war an Iron Curtain will fall over Europe" Paul Joseph Goebbels Reich Marshall of Propaganda.
America has always been a nation of checks and balances. If it is necessary for the common good to monitor the populace so be it. Presently it is a Democracy and if the majority feels it is the right thing to do. Then it's the right thing to do.
Carl,
We have a Representative Republic.
The problem with the whole spying thing is the majority of Congress did not know the extent of the operation. The basic concept was rubber stamped by the Congressional Committee on Security(?)for years, but after their token approval they lost track of the extent of what was going on.
Only the attack on the Press and Snowden have brought this to the attention of Congress and the American people. I for one am glad it will be re-evaluated by Congress.
The IRS, the Justice Dept, and the EPA have all been caught ignoring the, equal treatment under the law, theory. When the government treats illegal immigrants better than citizens we have a problem. This last election saw government depts. deliberately discourage Constitution supporting groups while progressive groups were encouraged. The government is out of control, as gun owners have noticed. The government is lying to us about things "for our own good."
In a free society this shouldn't be a problem and if America feels that there is a problem. It should be corrected. But this was just a record of numbers called basically traffic. I think what makes everybody nervous in the old day's you had to run a x connect to establish a tap. Now you just need a computer to program the switching equipment. The only thing I find amusing is Snowden is hiding out in Hong Kong. He says he choose China because they have a history of free speech. You cannot make this up.
Carl, "America feels that there is a problem"?
Ninety percent of the "Dumb-Dumb" voters in this country don't know what is going on. They all can explain in great detail what was on Showtime, HBO or Cinemax.
"In wartime truth is so precious that she should be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” W. Churchill.
Businesses and many online services routinely track us every day. Since I am forced for convenience sake to ignore it I really do not have an issue with the government accessing certain info. At work they read our emails and track everything we do anyway. I'd prefer a reduction in private sector businesses spying on us and keeping data for no useful purpose. The fact that the government can see it, bothers me as well, but there is little that can realistically be done about it at this point. The average politician is too stupid to write a coherent gun control bill they will never get a cyber privacy bill right. I'm just ticked Obama is not being held to the level of accountability a Republican would be.
The thing that bothers me is that "we" are only now outraged by this. Be honest, when Bush put the Patriot Act in place you didn't know your phone, cell, email, and Internet weren't going to be monitored. When Obama didn't repeal the Act the surveillance didn't go away, no a shock. Now we are mad?
As far as America knowing there is a problem. America has no idea of what a phone tap is. This is just the W.C. Fields quote about never wise up a sucker. But Gary riddle me this. Would you flee to Red China for asylum. As far as truth it's which talking head do you believe. Walter Cronkite only became the most trusted man in America after he cried with the JFK spot. Back then everybody toed the party line.
Rocky I like the qoute "true history can only be written in the blood of your enemies".
I know it would seem to be a just system if everyone in Congress approved of and knew exactly what the spy agencies were doing. But how effective would they be as spy agencies if every clown in Congress knew what they were up too? C'mon! If those guys/gals were any kind of trustworthy they probably wouldn't be able to get elected!
Snowden is no hero in my book. More like the opposite!
Fine line between his version of truth and treason. You decide. I vote treason. I'm sure the Chinese will get all they want from him.
Diann Feinstein is calling it Treason, and some say Patriot! what say you??
I say Treason.
It's not like the government has a guy reading EVERY person's e-mails, texts, Internet histories. Some of your information, that is attributed to you and has your name on it, goes through these databases and computers. All it's doing is searching keywords. If your stuff doesn't throw up any red flags, it's filed away never to be seen again. All this to keep us safe. Is that so bad? Sure the government messes up and abuses it's power occasionally but hey, I can't vote yet. Some of you elected them...
It is not what is being done with the data now, it is what a tyrannical Government could do with the capability down the road - just one stroke of the keyboard and we could be controlled beyond belief. This is an example of the camels nose under the tent.
Snowden and the AP and Fox are to be commended for bringing this to the attention of the American people.
I think everyone is missing the point!
We all know Bush signed the Patriot Act, which is good to a point and it is a fine line. He, I, and many of you know who the enemy is as did Bush and he only targeted them. Don't believe me go back through all the liberal outrage over him never once was he accused of spying on "ordinary Americans" and to this day nothing has been brought to light that he target just anyone except our enemy. Radical Muslim's are the target and still should be the target under the PA. This is a very simple concept that has already labeled me a zealot and probably now a bigot. Every muslim should be investigated until determined a non-threat to the USA. Once they find a threat then that threat should be investigated more closely by phone records, emails, web traffic, etc... to identify possible accomplices once the trail ends all threats and potential threats should be sought out and imprisoned until determined they are in fact a threat to the safety of the public, and if they are determined not to be release them on their way. Where all this went array is by the Obama administration targeting ordinary citizens out of a just in case measure whether to be PC or for some other nefarious reason. This is a modern day witch hunt when we know who the witch's are. In hunting terms it's the equivalent of going to the Gulf of Mexico to hunt a Wildebeast, it makes no sense.
Snowden's legal problem is that he accepted a security clearance that makes it a crime to disclose unauthorized national secrets. He has so far not revealed any illegality, just a few details regarding antiterror programs that were already known to exist.
But he has invited the Justice Department to investigate and seek to extradite him so that his example does not prompt others to leak secrets based on their own moral authority.
Well it's official, Boehner and the Republican leadership want Snowden shot as a traitor. Now is the time to stand up to both the Republicans and the Democrats and say loudly and clearly you won't be one of the sheeple anymore. Tell Boehner he's wrong.
I think 99 just about summed it up. Snowdens problem arises from the contract he signed. Dcast phone tapping is nothing new. I worked in Midtown in the 70's. The inside guys would routinely tap into the more interesting lines and hook them up to the the PA system to alleviate boredom. Usually g@y b0rdellos. So unauthorized listening is nothing new. Today you don't have to run a wire you just condition the switch remotely.
PS the FBI had a field office less than one city block away. I spliced a Tie cable to their basement and they took it from there. They also had apristinen Telephone truck in their garage. So there is nothing new under the sun.
Carl, I know as well as everyone else knows it's nothing new but it still is simply wrong and overstep of authority. I have never been arrested in my life never been accused of any crime, what gives anyone the right to look into my private life? I live a straight and narrow life so I don't have to worry about people looking into my life. This is in my opinion along with millions of others the verge or further of a authoritarian government. You seem well versed in history, I'm not but I have started studying more history in the last 12 yrs for the obvious reasons. Look at the former Soviet Union and how they gained control of their people. They turned person against person through similar means. They turned family members against one another, friends against each other, and every stranger was by all means a spy. They were effectively able to silence the masses. The government has no phathomable reason for what they are doing. Because your allowed to do something doesn't mean you should.
I recommend all of you to read this 3 part series "The Collectivist Mind Game" by Oleg Atbashian.
He is the developer of the website "The People's Cube"(I recommend) it's a political satire/humor website designed around Soviet Union agitprop. He is from Ukraine and worked for Communist Russia as a agitprop artist. You can look into his background further if you wish, but listen to what he says, pay attention to what it is he is trying to tell us. He uses satire and humor to spread the word so to make it more palatable to Americans because we never lived under an authoritarian or communist government.
thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/collectivist-mind-games-demonizing-the-non-compliant-t10610.html
Dcast I don't think this guy rises to the level of Julies and Ethel Rosenberg, Tokyo Rose or Jane Fonda for that matter. Oppenheimer even lost his clearance when his wife joined the Communist Party. All this guy Snowden did was reveal what the government can do. What he was doing was not listening to your conversation rather keeping track of traffic. He did not reveal any secrets. You have to keep in mind that world wide communication is very easy using the Internet. Using satellite and fiber optic communication it can only be monitored in this way. Because he violated his Oath I believe jail time is in order.
He is probably no more than a nebish that is looking for some fame and a better job. You also have to keep in mind Pre 9-11 the NSA that monitored all foreign and domestic conversations. But could not legally tell the CIA the American side of the conversation or tell the FBI the foreign side. That is how 9-11 was successful. Keeping that in mind I do not care if someone listens in on my wife giving me a promise for tonight.
Dcast;One more thing I'm in America because my maternal Grandfather beat up one of Hitler's entourage after a big parade in Munich in 1937. They even made a movie about it [Hitler not my Grand Dad] For this he spent 18 months in a concentration camp. What got him out was he was a decorated WWI vet and he drove a Beer Wagon in his later years. So he was well known. He could also see the writing on the wall. So he sent his daughter [my Mom] to America. So I know all about 1-800-Turn In Your Buddy.
Another thing you have to remember. My wife is involved with off shore banking. My son with soft ware for stocks and bonds. America believes that the profits from all the TONS of drugs is carried across the border in a Knapp sack. Those millions are sent with the push of a computer key. Human trafficking and child p0rn0graphy is also dependent on an unsupervised Internet. So what do you want to trade?
"All this guy Snowden did was reveal what the government can do. What he was doing was not listening to your conversation rather keeping track of traffic." We'll see what else comes out. The Guardian already came out and said there is more to come. I agree he is no great hero but he has got the discussion going and brought to the forefront to be discussed among the public. This wasn't an option before they took it upon themselves to do what they want.
What I want to trade?
1) Surveillance of private citizens for surveillance of known problems
2) A slap on the hand for rapists, child molesters, pedophiles, etc... for due justice. My opinion of due justice is death, it's time to make examples instead of complacency.
3) Instead of investigating private people's information maybe they should look into the company. There is no need to snoop on your wife or son without a problem within the company or technology. No?
4) Instead of targeting a bunch of bluehairs how about those who bow down several times a day towards Mecca.
5) How about profiling the previously mentioned?
6) How about gathering intelligence on the cartels?
7) How about doing their job in bring down the National Debt?
8) How about cleaning their own house before going about someone else's business?
We could go on but I have the feeling it's in vain. All of this is needless, unless you have something in the works. This smells ill-intent. Yes I got that it has gone on forever, but there were/are limits to this.
Some pretty good point Dcast. Except you are not separating punishment from investigation. Case in point the Boston Bombers. Everybody thought the younger brother was a great kid. Granted the older brother went back to Russia. But so what. I have a friend that went to Cuba to visit his family. My oldest son and his wife just got back from Oman in UAE. His company sent him and another employee on a 10 day vacation as a reward. Along with a bunch of other guy's from across the US and Europe. Two years ago they sent him to Viet Nam. Travel and Religion are not the indicators you think.
99explorer is correct. He has a security clearance that makes it a crime to reveal confidential information. I have a security clearance and have also signed confidentiality agreemnets in the past. I take these kinds of things very seriously because of the consequences. Snowden knew that what he was doing was wrong that's why he went on the lam!
Post an Answer
Dcast I don't think this guy rises to the level of Julies and Ethel Rosenberg, Tokyo Rose or Jane Fonda for that matter. Oppenheimer even lost his clearance when his wife joined the Communist Party. All this guy Snowden did was reveal what the government can do. What he was doing was not listening to your conversation rather keeping track of traffic. He did not reveal any secrets. You have to keep in mind that world wide communication is very easy using the Internet. Using satellite and fiber optic communication it can only be monitored in this way. Because he violated his Oath I believe jail time is in order.
He is probably no more than a nebish that is looking for some fame and a better job. You also have to keep in mind Pre 9-11 the NSA that monitored all foreign and domestic conversations. But could not legally tell the CIA the American side of the conversation or tell the FBI the foreign side. That is how 9-11 was successful. Keeping that in mind I do not care if someone listens in on my wife giving me a promise for tonight.
Another thing you have to remember. My wife is involved with off shore banking. My son with soft ware for stocks and bonds. America believes that the profits from all the TONS of drugs is carried across the border in a Knapp sack. Those millions are sent with the push of a computer key. Human trafficking and child p0rn0graphy is also dependent on an unsupervised Internet. So what do you want to trade?
Dcast;One more thing I'm in America because my maternal Grandfather beat up one of Hitler's entourage after a big parade in Munich in 1937. They even made a movie about it [Hitler not my Grand Dad] For this he spent 18 months in a concentration camp. What got him out was he was a decorated WWI vet and he drove a Beer Wagon in his later years. So he was well known. He could also see the writing on the wall. So he sent his daughter [my Mom] to America. So I know all about 1-800-Turn In Your Buddy.
Some pretty good point Dcast. Except you are not separating punishment from investigation. Case in point the Boston Bombers. Everybody thought the younger brother was a great kid. Granted the older brother went back to Russia. But so what. I have a friend that went to Cuba to visit his family. My oldest son and his wife just got back from Oman in UAE. His company sent him and another employee on a 10 day vacation as a reward. Along with a bunch of other guy's from across the US and Europe. Two years ago they sent him to Viet Nam. Travel and Religion are not the indicators you think.
Ten years ago I had 35 years in the communications industry. I can tell you the only difference between illegal and legal is can it be used in court. Even in the olden days of analogue service, collection was possible. Fast forward to today throw a computer in he mix and everybody gets nervous and jerky. Back in the old days the phone company had an amusing saying. You may have never had a Policeman in your house but you had a Phone man under your bed. [You know the the phone on the night stand].
"In wartime truth is so precious that she should be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” W. Churchill.
The thing that bothers me is that "we" are only now outraged by this. Be honest, when Bush put the Patriot Act in place you didn't know your phone, cell, email, and Internet weren't going to be monitored. When Obama didn't repeal the Act the surveillance didn't go away, no a shock. Now we are mad?
It is not what is being done with the data now, it is what a tyrannical Government could do with the capability down the road - just one stroke of the keyboard and we could be controlled beyond belief. This is an example of the camels nose under the tent.
Snowden and the AP and Fox are to be commended for bringing this to the attention of the American people.
Well it's official, Boehner and the Republican leadership want Snowden shot as a traitor. Now is the time to stand up to both the Republicans and the Democrats and say loudly and clearly you won't be one of the sheeple anymore. Tell Boehner he's wrong.
Carl, I know as well as everyone else knows it's nothing new but it still is simply wrong and overstep of authority. I have never been arrested in my life never been accused of any crime, what gives anyone the right to look into my private life? I live a straight and narrow life so I don't have to worry about people looking into my life. This is in my opinion along with millions of others the verge or further of a authoritarian government. You seem well versed in history, I'm not but I have started studying more history in the last 12 yrs for the obvious reasons. Look at the former Soviet Union and how they gained control of their people. They turned person against person through similar means. They turned family members against one another, friends against each other, and every stranger was by all means a spy. They were effectively able to silence the masses. The government has no phathomable reason for what they are doing. Because your allowed to do something doesn't mean you should.
"All this guy Snowden did was reveal what the government can do. What he was doing was not listening to your conversation rather keeping track of traffic." We'll see what else comes out. The Guardian already came out and said there is more to come. I agree he is no great hero but he has got the discussion going and brought to the forefront to be discussed among the public. This wasn't an option before they took it upon themselves to do what they want.
What I want to trade?
1) Surveillance of private citizens for surveillance of known problems
2) A slap on the hand for rapists, child molesters, pedophiles, etc... for due justice. My opinion of due justice is death, it's time to make examples instead of complacency.
3) Instead of investigating private people's information maybe they should look into the company. There is no need to snoop on your wife or son without a problem within the company or technology. No?
4) Instead of targeting a bunch of bluehairs how about those who bow down several times a day towards Mecca.
5) How about profiling the previously mentioned?
6) How about gathering intelligence on the cartels?
7) How about doing their job in bring down the National Debt?
8) How about cleaning their own house before going about someone else's business?
We could go on but I have the feeling it's in vain. All of this is needless, unless you have something in the works. This smells ill-intent. Yes I got that it has gone on forever, but there were/are limits to this.
Technically what this wayward administration is doing is legal under the Patriot Act, but our government never target ordinary Americans before. So what he did could get him a death penalty or life in prison. The reason why this has exploded into a big controversy is because this administration is using it for vast majority of the country and not using it in a targeted situation. There is no reason for them targeting me or you when everyone knows who the enemy is. Also this really got a lot of the media to open their eyes although they are still glazed over in a hypnotic trance. This guy did in my Libertarian side views expose an evil thing, but at the same time gave the enemy plenty of useful information. Regardless it got the public talking about it and considering their views on spying.
OntarioHonker,
The operation failed to catch the Boston bombers even after the Ruskies told us to watch them.
The CIA has been doing this for years from Arlington,VA but that was only international electronic communications. That was probably how they kept track of OBL, even after the press leaked we were listening to his calls. That was a Cray computer - fastest we had at the time. This operation in Utah is going to store a Terabite of info. The computers are so powerful they have 3 million gallons of cooling water to keep them running.
No thanks, I do not want such a pervasive Government working in the US. You do not mind because you are Canadian - different world there.
BTW, have you noticed the media is playing down the California shooter probably because is a Arib. Have you heard them say his name? not very often. Maybe he was one of the individual cells we are suppose to have living among us. 1,300 rounds of ammo - give me a break. He was in a mission. Then they showed a black powder revolver. What's up with that?
Dcast,
I have heard the spying sees a big increase in traffic just prior to a planned attack. I would guess they want to look at everyone's communications to get a base line of 'noise' so they can then spot any increase in activity, and key in on those communications.
Still, I am not in favor of collecting this data en-mass, which in the future could be used in any number of malicious ways.
PS; To put all this in prospective. Five months after 911 all the terrorists were granted Visa's albeit posthumously.
At what point do we, as Americans, stop giving up our freedoms in the name of safety?
"A man who gives up liberty for safety, deserves neither." T. Jefferson
Honk,
"...I have nothing to hide..."
Nor do I, therefore the Gov't had NO right to snoop around in my phone calls!
They're going after E-mail, too!
Just another "Enhanced" background check!
If I had a criminal record, I might expect it.
I'm not!
Just another reason they're out of line.
A little profiling would curtail the problem post haste.
You know, the same thing radical Islamics do.
"Are you Muslim?"
"No."
"Then you must convert to Islam or die."
But then, Muslims feel it's okay to lie if it promotes their religion.
FirstBubba I think there is a danger in taking a quote out of the it's context in history. Good old TJ thought nothing of sending the common man to fight against England because he was tired of paying taxes. He thought it was OK to subject his illegitimate children to a life of slavery. Women were little more than chattel. All these high ideals may not have meant what they mean today. One of my favorites was "If we loose this war an Iron Curtain will fall over Europe" Paul Joseph Goebbels Reich Marshall of Propaganda.
America has always been a nation of checks and balances. If it is necessary for the common good to monitor the populace so be it. Presently it is a Democracy and if the majority feels it is the right thing to do. Then it's the right thing to do.
Carl,
We have a Representative Republic.
The problem with the whole spying thing is the majority of Congress did not know the extent of the operation. The basic concept was rubber stamped by the Congressional Committee on Security(?)for years, but after their token approval they lost track of the extent of what was going on.
Only the attack on the Press and Snowden have brought this to the attention of Congress and the American people. I for one am glad it will be re-evaluated by Congress.
The IRS, the Justice Dept, and the EPA have all been caught ignoring the, equal treatment under the law, theory. When the government treats illegal immigrants better than citizens we have a problem. This last election saw government depts. deliberately discourage Constitution supporting groups while progressive groups were encouraged. The government is out of control, as gun owners have noticed. The government is lying to us about things "for our own good."
In a free society this shouldn't be a problem and if America feels that there is a problem. It should be corrected. But this was just a record of numbers called basically traffic. I think what makes everybody nervous in the old day's you had to run a x connect to establish a tap. Now you just need a computer to program the switching equipment. The only thing I find amusing is Snowden is hiding out in Hong Kong. He says he choose China because they have a history of free speech. You cannot make this up.
Carl, "America feels that there is a problem"?
Ninety percent of the "Dumb-Dumb" voters in this country don't know what is going on. They all can explain in great detail what was on Showtime, HBO or Cinemax.
Businesses and many online services routinely track us every day. Since I am forced for convenience sake to ignore it I really do not have an issue with the government accessing certain info. At work they read our emails and track everything we do anyway. I'd prefer a reduction in private sector businesses spying on us and keeping data for no useful purpose. The fact that the government can see it, bothers me as well, but there is little that can realistically be done about it at this point. The average politician is too stupid to write a coherent gun control bill they will never get a cyber privacy bill right. I'm just ticked Obama is not being held to the level of accountability a Republican would be.
As far as America knowing there is a problem. America has no idea of what a phone tap is. This is just the W.C. Fields quote about never wise up a sucker. But Gary riddle me this. Would you flee to Red China for asylum. As far as truth it's which talking head do you believe. Walter Cronkite only became the most trusted man in America after he cried with the JFK spot. Back then everybody toed the party line.
Rocky I like the qoute "true history can only be written in the blood of your enemies".
Snowden is no hero in my book. More like the opposite!
Fine line between his version of truth and treason. You decide. I vote treason. I'm sure the Chinese will get all they want from him.
Diann Feinstein is calling it Treason, and some say Patriot! what say you??
I say Treason.
It's not like the government has a guy reading EVERY person's e-mails, texts, Internet histories. Some of your information, that is attributed to you and has your name on it, goes through these databases and computers. All it's doing is searching keywords. If your stuff doesn't throw up any red flags, it's filed away never to be seen again. All this to keep us safe. Is that so bad? Sure the government messes up and abuses it's power occasionally but hey, I can't vote yet. Some of you elected them...
I think everyone is missing the point!
We all know Bush signed the Patriot Act, which is good to a point and it is a fine line. He, I, and many of you know who the enemy is as did Bush and he only targeted them. Don't believe me go back through all the liberal outrage over him never once was he accused of spying on "ordinary Americans" and to this day nothing has been brought to light that he target just anyone except our enemy. Radical Muslim's are the target and still should be the target under the PA. This is a very simple concept that has already labeled me a zealot and probably now a bigot. Every muslim should be investigated until determined a non-threat to the USA. Once they find a threat then that threat should be investigated more closely by phone records, emails, web traffic, etc... to identify possible accomplices once the trail ends all threats and potential threats should be sought out and imprisoned until determined they are in fact a threat to the safety of the public, and if they are determined not to be release them on their way. Where all this went array is by the Obama administration targeting ordinary citizens out of a just in case measure whether to be PC or for some other nefarious reason. This is a modern day witch hunt when we know who the witch's are. In hunting terms it's the equivalent of going to the Gulf of Mexico to hunt a Wildebeast, it makes no sense.
Snowden's legal problem is that he accepted a security clearance that makes it a crime to disclose unauthorized national secrets. He has so far not revealed any illegality, just a few details regarding antiterror programs that were already known to exist.
But he has invited the Justice Department to investigate and seek to extradite him so that his example does not prompt others to leak secrets based on their own moral authority.
I think 99 just about summed it up. Snowdens problem arises from the contract he signed. Dcast phone tapping is nothing new. I worked in Midtown in the 70's. The inside guys would routinely tap into the more interesting lines and hook them up to the the PA system to alleviate boredom. Usually g@y b0rdellos. So unauthorized listening is nothing new. Today you don't have to run a wire you just condition the switch remotely.
PS the FBI had a field office less than one city block away. I spliced a Tie cable to their basement and they took it from there. They also had apristinen Telephone truck in their garage. So there is nothing new under the sun.
I recommend all of you to read this 3 part series "The Collectivist Mind Game" by Oleg Atbashian.
He is the developer of the website "The People's Cube"(I recommend) it's a political satire/humor website designed around Soviet Union agitprop. He is from Ukraine and worked for Communist Russia as a agitprop artist. You can look into his background further if you wish, but listen to what he says, pay attention to what it is he is trying to tell us. He uses satire and humor to spread the word so to make it more palatable to Americans because we never lived under an authoritarian or communist government.
thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/collectivist-mind-games-demonizing-the-non-compliant-t10610.html
99explorer is correct. He has a security clearance that makes it a crime to reveal confidential information. I have a security clearance and have also signed confidentiality agreemnets in the past. I take these kinds of things very seriously because of the consequences. Snowden knew that what he was doing was wrong that's why he went on the lam!
Yeah, Bubba, wouldn't it be nice if all the criminals and terrorists wore uniforms or walked around with placards identifying them as such. They don't. Like you, I'm also not a criminal or terrorist. I know that. But do you? Do you have a right to find out for sure if your family works in buildings or rides mass transit that makes them vulnerable to terrorist attacks? In a country where everyone is supposed to be legal under the law, I don't have a problem with everyone being suspects ... rather than no one. Sadly, after 9/11 our world changed. We need to accept it. To keep my grandson safe, I'm willing to live with less liberty. I don't like it but it is what it is. We're not living in the 18th century any more ... not even the 20th century. Having said that, I don't oppose vigilance either.
Jimbo, the government security agencies lost track of the Boston Marathon kooks because some idiot clerical person misspelled their names. Sh*t happens sometimes in spite of everyone's best efforts.
I know it would seem to be a just system if everyone in Congress approved of and knew exactly what the spy agencies were doing. But how effective would they be as spy agencies if every clown in Congress knew what they were up too? C'mon! If those guys/gals were any kind of trustworthy they probably wouldn't be able to get elected!
Eavesdropping is how they managed to get Bin Laden. As an American living outside the country using Verizon, I'm sure they have been peaking at my communications across the border quite a bit. No problem for me (and you guys thought I was a liberal!). I have nothing to hide and if it keeps you safe, the US govt can snoop away at my communications all they want.
Post an Answer