Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
ok, i nkow you can convert a ruger 10/22 into a full auto, can you convert the new semi-auto tommy gun into a fully auto weapon? is it leagal?

Question by the cowboy. Uploaded on March 18, 2010

Answers (22)

Top Rated
All Answers
from Hobob wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Its illegal to convert either. Full auto=felony. It will get you major problems.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

That felony will follow you for a long time and look really bad on a record. Because I believe it is a federal crime instead of a state crime.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Conversion of any weapon to full auto is indeed a federal offence, and draws stiff penalties. Felony = no gun rights.

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

well said crm. nothing further.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can't own an automatic weapon, that is why every weapon you buy is either a single shot or semi auto.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can only buy and sell with a "Class 3" FFL. You cannot build any without registered, class 3 parts.

They tightened up the laws lately. For many years, owning the parts needed for a conversion was okay, as long as you didn't use them.

Here's an example... A friend had a M1 carbine. The M2 was designed to be easy to upgrade. Adding 7 parts to an M1 (and stock or mod) made it an M2, and full auto. At the time, it was illegal to sell all 7 parts. You could go to one table, buy 4 of them, and go down the row and buy the other 3. Bizarre, but legal (Ga.).

But if you're thinking about doing this after the warnings above, simply call your local FBI office for advice.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can own an automatic weapon but the correct paperwork and licensing is needed, and there is a lot of paperwork.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If you convert one without the proper licensing paperwork, you should put your family and career plans on hold for an extended stay at the Crossbar Hotel.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

And besides that the "Spray & Pray" method will not be very effective. I looks good in the Movie Theater, but really sux in reality, that is why the Armed at fire 3 round bursts, except for M-60 and M-2 Machine Guns. And Gatlings.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rudyglove27 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Agreed with crm3006 answer above and A +1 for you sir!!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I'm glad they have tightened up the regs. Seemed really stupid to have federal regs against owning an automatic weapon and silencer but still legal to sell all the parts necessary to make one. Thirty years ago I used to see scores of ads for this junk in Shotgun News. Pretty scary.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 4trx300 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

ont,honker. why is it stupid to have a silencer?what difference does it make if my 223 sounds like a 22?less hearing damage.being considerate of others.these are some reasons im glad silencers are available in wv.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

if i get it right, supressors are legal in some states, but silencers are tough to get the permits for. either way, the sound isn't silenced as much as some people think. not that i own either, mind you.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If my neighbor is using his backyard for target practice, I'm not really worried about him being "considerate" about the noise. He shouldn't be doing it in this neighborhood and I'd like to know if he is. People who want to hide the noise of their guns are usually doing it for some other reason than consideration. And it's usually not a good reason. Especially since silencers tend to compromise accuracy considerably.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Ontario,
You are incorrect on so many points. Where shall I start?

Now, if you choose to cobble up something in the garage for your 10/22 without going through the right process of obtaining a tax stamp for it, it will be instantly illegal. You will be tempting fate. There will be a jail cell waiting on you.

As for "making" a silencer, that's not rocket science. You can legally construct one yourself if you know how to navigate through the BATFE rules. You file the proper paperwork, wait for their approval, and obtain the Federal tax stamp for it, thus making it legal. That's a very much simplified explanation of it but it is possible. Number one requirement is having a clean background......

Buying a factory-made one is much easier but you will still have a wait for the Feds to process your paperwork and give you the OK. The Class 3 dealer you purchase it from holds the item until you obtain your tax stamp & approval.

Owning an automatic weapon follows a similar path but you cannot construct a new one (unless you are a licensed firearms manufacturer). Otherwise the firearm must be a previously licensed one(or a licensed auto-sear) and you have to go through a similar paperwork/tax stamp process with the BATFE on that for your legal ownership.

As for accuracy, my wife's uncle's suppressed .308 custom Mauser pours 'em into one-hole groups with or without the can at 100 yds. I notice some POI shift when the can is on, but as for accuracy it may even be better with it on there.

I attended a suppressed-only shoot a while back and a great deal of the folks there are VERY accuracy-oriented. I think they would raise hell if their weapons weren't accurate with the devices on. And there were a lot of big time manufacturers present. They'd be the first to hear of any accuracy issues. I got to shoot everything from .22's to a McMillan .50 - and hit everything I aimed at. If there was an accuracy issue in play it would have been my trigger pulling abilities.

respectfully,
S Ga

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from 4trx300 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

sgaredneck,you rock.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

4trx300, thanks for the comment. Next time I'm playing the Pi Krappa Zappa fraternity, or the I Phelta Thi sorority in Tuscaloosa, I'll remind myself I still rock even though I'm old enough to be those kids' daddy....almost...LMAO!!!

Ontario, I should add too that my main reason for being a proponent of them (legal ownership of silencers) is that my livelihood (musician/sound contractor/engineer) depends upon my ears working properly. If my ears don't work right, there will be less food on the table, or a roof over that table. A deaf musician is about as useful as a busted prophylactic......

The supposition of a neighbor shooting in his back yard is flawed in several ways. He's potentially breaking the law (silenced or not) by being close to residences and/or streets or roads, and by being in a municipality if you are residing in a city.

Cowboy, if you are so enamored with machine guns I recommend you find someone who is a legal Class 3 firearm owner before you get the idea of cooking up something. Maybe go to a MG shoot somewhere that is sanctioned by a range or a shooting club. At some of these you can buy ammo and shoot their stuff under supervision. After you get to the realization that a Class 3 firearm is one of the most wasteful and expensive things to feed in the whole world, you won't be so enamored with them. Granted they are fun to shoot, but it is better IMHO to shoot someone else's Class 3 firearm and not have the liabilities of owning one.

R/s
S Ga

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

'neck-
Excellent answers, and much more in depth than mine. I took the young man's question to mean he wanted to cobble up some sort of full auto in his garage or whatever. You are absolutely right about full auto being the most wasteful way to shoot at anything. Having experience with the M-2, M-60, AK-47, M-16, CAR-15, MAC-10 45 ACP and Thompson sub, the only use I can come up with for any of the above is to lay down suppressing fire. Not very useful in a hunting situation. But, as you said, they ARE fun to shoot!
crm

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If you want to shoot Machine guns,I suggest you spend a few years in The Army Or Marine Corps, you will not have to buy the ammo and eventually you will get over the fascination with them I did ( After 27 years) ;)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from d1996 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can make the Thompson fully auto and i dont know about the 10/22 though but it is illegal unless you have a gunsmiths license. From what i have heard its not that hard to get the license and then it is legal

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

d1996,

Incorrect. There is no 'gunsmith's license I know of. IMO there ought to be, as there are a few out there that claim to be gunsmiths, and shouldn't be allowed to even work on a Briggs & Stratton, much less a firearm. That's a whole 'nother subject altogether. A legit gunsmith will NOT do such a thing. They know to not lose their livelihood by doing something that reckless & stupid, not to mention aiding and abetting you in a felony level federal firearms crime.

As for making a full-auto weapon, the only way I know of to legally do it is to be a federally licensed and titled firearms MANUFACTURER and originate(read build from scratch) a newly serailized firearm. You can't just go to wally world and buy up some 10/22's and start converting them. That is 100% illegal. AFAIK it is illegal to convert a factory-originated semi-auto weapon into a full-auto one unless you have a previously licensed auto sear(pre-86)that has been transferred & tax stamped. If you do some research on the subject you will get clued in on the definition of the laws and what is and isn't legal.

Making the statement on your post above is somewhat reckless IMO. You are on the borderline of telling folks to do something illegal and then you are following it with incorrect information about "gunsmiths".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 44 weeks ago

sgaredneck touched on the most important note about this, which makes the question moot.

Under the '88 law, the "machine gun population" was frozen. This meant that the number of automatic weapons in the country could not be increased. It also covered import of several easy-to-convert weapons.

Some companies, like Colt, knew this was coming and rush-built and registered a group of auto lowers and sear kits so that they were registered before the law passed.

Today, there is no legal way allowed for anyone to convert their own weapon, regardless of whatever licenses exists, in theory or fact.

There's a few places (saw one at the last show) that will sell you an older auto for a cost that's extortion.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from crm3006 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Conversion of any weapon to full auto is indeed a federal offence, and draws stiff penalties. Felony = no gun rights.

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hobob wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Its illegal to convert either. Full auto=felony. It will get you major problems.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If you convert one without the proper licensing paperwork, you should put your family and career plans on hold for an extended stay at the Crossbar Hotel.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

That felony will follow you for a long time and look really bad on a record. Because I believe it is a federal crime instead of a state crime.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can only buy and sell with a "Class 3" FFL. You cannot build any without registered, class 3 parts.

They tightened up the laws lately. For many years, owning the parts needed for a conversion was okay, as long as you didn't use them.

Here's an example... A friend had a M1 carbine. The M2 was designed to be easy to upgrade. Adding 7 parts to an M1 (and stock or mod) made it an M2, and full auto. At the time, it was illegal to sell all 7 parts. You could go to one table, buy 4 of them, and go down the row and buy the other 3. Bizarre, but legal (Ga.).

But if you're thinking about doing this after the warnings above, simply call your local FBI office for advice.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can own an automatic weapon but the correct paperwork and licensing is needed, and there is a lot of paperwork.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Ontario,
You are incorrect on so many points. Where shall I start?

Now, if you choose to cobble up something in the garage for your 10/22 without going through the right process of obtaining a tax stamp for it, it will be instantly illegal. You will be tempting fate. There will be a jail cell waiting on you.

As for "making" a silencer, that's not rocket science. You can legally construct one yourself if you know how to navigate through the BATFE rules. You file the proper paperwork, wait for their approval, and obtain the Federal tax stamp for it, thus making it legal. That's a very much simplified explanation of it but it is possible. Number one requirement is having a clean background......

Buying a factory-made one is much easier but you will still have a wait for the Feds to process your paperwork and give you the OK. The Class 3 dealer you purchase it from holds the item until you obtain your tax stamp & approval.

Owning an automatic weapon follows a similar path but you cannot construct a new one (unless you are a licensed firearms manufacturer). Otherwise the firearm must be a previously licensed one(or a licensed auto-sear) and you have to go through a similar paperwork/tax stamp process with the BATFE on that for your legal ownership.

As for accuracy, my wife's uncle's suppressed .308 custom Mauser pours 'em into one-hole groups with or without the can at 100 yds. I notice some POI shift when the can is on, but as for accuracy it may even be better with it on there.

I attended a suppressed-only shoot a while back and a great deal of the folks there are VERY accuracy-oriented. I think they would raise hell if their weapons weren't accurate with the devices on. And there were a lot of big time manufacturers present. They'd be the first to hear of any accuracy issues. I got to shoot everything from .22's to a McMillan .50 - and hit everything I aimed at. If there was an accuracy issue in play it would have been my trigger pulling abilities.

respectfully,
S Ga

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

well said crm. nothing further.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If you want to shoot Machine guns,I suggest you spend a few years in The Army Or Marine Corps, you will not have to buy the ammo and eventually you will get over the fascination with them I did ( After 27 years) ;)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from rudyglove27 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Agreed with crm3006 answer above and A +1 for you sir!!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

if i get it right, supressors are legal in some states, but silencers are tough to get the permits for. either way, the sound isn't silenced as much as some people think. not that i own either, mind you.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 4trx300 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

sgaredneck,you rock.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

4trx300, thanks for the comment. Next time I'm playing the Pi Krappa Zappa fraternity, or the I Phelta Thi sorority in Tuscaloosa, I'll remind myself I still rock even though I'm old enough to be those kids' daddy....almost...LMAO!!!

Ontario, I should add too that my main reason for being a proponent of them (legal ownership of silencers) is that my livelihood (musician/sound contractor/engineer) depends upon my ears working properly. If my ears don't work right, there will be less food on the table, or a roof over that table. A deaf musician is about as useful as a busted prophylactic......

The supposition of a neighbor shooting in his back yard is flawed in several ways. He's potentially breaking the law (silenced or not) by being close to residences and/or streets or roads, and by being in a municipality if you are residing in a city.

Cowboy, if you are so enamored with machine guns I recommend you find someone who is a legal Class 3 firearm owner before you get the idea of cooking up something. Maybe go to a MG shoot somewhere that is sanctioned by a range or a shooting club. At some of these you can buy ammo and shoot their stuff under supervision. After you get to the realization that a Class 3 firearm is one of the most wasteful and expensive things to feed in the whole world, you won't be so enamored with them. Granted they are fun to shoot, but it is better IMHO to shoot someone else's Class 3 firearm and not have the liabilities of owning one.

R/s
S Ga

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

'neck-
Excellent answers, and much more in depth than mine. I took the young man's question to mean he wanted to cobble up some sort of full auto in his garage or whatever. You are absolutely right about full auto being the most wasteful way to shoot at anything. Having experience with the M-2, M-60, AK-47, M-16, CAR-15, MAC-10 45 ACP and Thompson sub, the only use I can come up with for any of the above is to lay down suppressing fire. Not very useful in a hunting situation. But, as you said, they ARE fun to shoot!
crm

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can't own an automatic weapon, that is why every weapon you buy is either a single shot or semi auto.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

And besides that the "Spray & Pray" method will not be very effective. I looks good in the Movie Theater, but really sux in reality, that is why the Armed at fire 3 round bursts, except for M-60 and M-2 Machine Guns. And Gatlings.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 4trx300 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

ont,honker. why is it stupid to have a silencer?what difference does it make if my 223 sounds like a 22?less hearing damage.being considerate of others.these are some reasons im glad silencers are available in wv.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

If my neighbor is using his backyard for target practice, I'm not really worried about him being "considerate" about the noise. He shouldn't be doing it in this neighborhood and I'd like to know if he is. People who want to hide the noise of their guns are usually doing it for some other reason than consideration. And it's usually not a good reason. Especially since silencers tend to compromise accuracy considerably.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 44 weeks ago

sgaredneck touched on the most important note about this, which makes the question moot.

Under the '88 law, the "machine gun population" was frozen. This meant that the number of automatic weapons in the country could not be increased. It also covered import of several easy-to-convert weapons.

Some companies, like Colt, knew this was coming and rush-built and registered a group of auto lowers and sear kits so that they were registered before the law passed.

Today, there is no legal way allowed for anyone to convert their own weapon, regardless of whatever licenses exists, in theory or fact.

There's a few places (saw one at the last show) that will sell you an older auto for a cost that's extortion.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I'm glad they have tightened up the regs. Seemed really stupid to have federal regs against owning an automatic weapon and silencer but still legal to sell all the parts necessary to make one. Thirty years ago I used to see scores of ads for this junk in Shotgun News. Pretty scary.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from d1996 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

You can make the Thompson fully auto and i dont know about the 10/22 though but it is illegal unless you have a gunsmiths license. From what i have heard its not that hard to get the license and then it is legal

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

d1996,

Incorrect. There is no 'gunsmith's license I know of. IMO there ought to be, as there are a few out there that claim to be gunsmiths, and shouldn't be allowed to even work on a Briggs & Stratton, much less a firearm. That's a whole 'nother subject altogether. A legit gunsmith will NOT do such a thing. They know to not lose their livelihood by doing something that reckless & stupid, not to mention aiding and abetting you in a felony level federal firearms crime.

As for making a full-auto weapon, the only way I know of to legally do it is to be a federally licensed and titled firearms MANUFACTURER and originate(read build from scratch) a newly serailized firearm. You can't just go to wally world and buy up some 10/22's and start converting them. That is 100% illegal. AFAIK it is illegal to convert a factory-originated semi-auto weapon into a full-auto one unless you have a previously licensed auto sear(pre-86)that has been transferred & tax stamped. If you do some research on the subject you will get clued in on the definition of the laws and what is and isn't legal.

Making the statement on your post above is somewhat reckless IMO. You are on the borderline of telling folks to do something illegal and then you are following it with incorrect information about "gunsmiths".

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

bmxbiz-fs