I'm afraid I don't quite know what you mean.

Synthetic stocks are lighter and more stable, meaning they won't swell or warp due to weather.

Each have their pros and cons. Synthetics are cheaper to make by far and are good if you want light weight. They are also a little more weather tolerant and could be considered more accurate in that they don't warp with water or temperature changes like wood does (however unless you are hunting in constant freezing rain, you shouldn't notice a difference). Wood is expensive to make and even more expensive if you want it decorated with good checkering and bedded accurately. But wood can be a thing of beauty. Depends on what you want and what you like. If the price is the same, I take nice looking wood every time however, I do have a nice ultralight rifle with synthetic stock that is real easy to carry over rough terrain.

On a hunting gun I prefer synthetic stocks for their lighter weight and higher durability.

You might find some wood stocks more tolerant of high heat (stable) than some synthetics.

some synthetics are ok but NEVER buy injected molding, it's light and cheap for a reason, it's prone to bending under stress or heat and it's weak. I always buy wood stocks, if your worried about swelling and warping buy a wood stock made in layers (simular to plywood) the cross grains distribute the stresses against each other instead of warping and the strength is unbeatable, take it from a guy that's had to use it as a club once or twice.

One thing to be mindful of is that a synthetic stock is a bit lighter. On a 270 it dosen't matter but if you had a heavy recoiling gun eg 338 win mag. Some extra weight can help it feel a little nicer on your shoulder.