Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
Is a 117 grain bullet from a 25-06 enough to ethically kill an elk?

Question by Stephen08. Uploaded on February 11, 2010

Answers (35)

Top Rated
All Answers
from tony167n wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

im sure it would work if you hit it in the right spot and try not to shoot through heavy bone. but its just my opinion that you should have at least a 30-06 for elk prefereably bigger, like a .300 mag. but im sure it will work and good luck hunting.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The year before last one of the guys in our party took his elk with that round. However it did take two shots to put it on the ground. With any round it is all about shot placement.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I know that Ol' Clay like the 25/06, but he shoots much better than I, so I use a 30/06 unless I am where big grizzly's roam then it's a 375 H&H just in case.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Elk have been killed with even smaller or less powerful rounds.That said even those that love the 25/06 would tell you it's not a elk round.(Always use enough gun)

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from varmit slayer wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I wouldnt use a 25/06 on anything bigger than mulies.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I would fill my pockets with rocks to throw at it too! Do yourself and the elk a service by using a bigger caliber. 270, 30-06, 7mm are minimum in my eyes.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The 25-06 is the smallest recommended cartridge recommended for Elk. Since I reload and worked up pet loads that shoot along other loads, personally I would use a 120 grain Nosler Partition. In the past few years, ammunition manufacturers have turned the shooting world upside down. To answer your question the best, you need to find a source of available ammunition you need. A 115 to 120 grain that will not blowup upon impact, Nosler Partition, Barnes, A-Frame and Hornady just came out with a new bullet similar to the Barnes. I know this is a general answer, but with all the darn good choices out there now and what is available in your area is hard to recommend. Remember to buy enough to sight in with, do a little plinking at medium and long range to get the feel of the load and to hunt with.

Moishe

Talking from experience, 375 H&H or better put, all the fire power in the world will not do you any good if you cannot hit with it and follow up on repeated shot. But the best Bear protection as I said before is a small pocket size 22 pistol and a pair of tennis shoes. When the Bear charges, you shoot your buddy in the ankle and run like HELL!

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Sourdough Dave

A +1 for you

From Clays archives of bookmarks, places, information and things to read,

ken.mcloud said it best!

“So, I think that the superior killing power of larger rounds is largely in our heads.(likely testosterone induced) A flat-shooting round that you can accurately place will produce as many if not more "bang-flop" kills as a heavy caliber round.”

Disclaimer: This opinion does not constitute legal advice. Please consult an attorney licensed to pratice in your jurisdiction. Wear sunscreen, protective eyewear, and hearing protection. Buckle your seatbelt. Call your mother. -- The Armchair Outfitter

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

A many of Elk have been successfully taken with 243 105 grain soft points

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Has anyone seen what a 25-06 120 Nosler Partition does? WOW!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Well placed it'd likely do fine, but there are surely better(bigger) choices.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

steve182 a +1 for you, regardless what your using, Ive witnessed Moose hunters empty there 375 H&H and 460 Weatherbys three times and still had to trailem almost to Russia!

The #1 recommended cartridge for Elk is the 338 Win Mag, not to big and not to small. But I still wouldn't give it a second thought of using my 25-06!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamaoutlaw wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Iam not knocking anyones faith in a caliber.But a 25-06 is barely legal to hunt whitetail in the state where i live.I would say that there have been a lot of elk killed with smaller rifles,while they were more than likely well placed shots at moderate distances.I wouldn't advocate this caliber for hunting elk for everyone it's just to light and there are far too many varibles.JIMO

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I took this question as if it were from a new elk hunter or average hunter who does not reload.One who doesn't shoot hundreds if not thousands of rounds a year.I reload and shoot hundreds of rounds so if I were out deer hunting I too would shoot a elk with my 270win.(Barnes tsx).That said I wouldn't leave the house to go on a elk hunt with that gun must less a 25/06,Iwould take my 30/06 or Rem7mmmag they too would be topped with barnes tsx bullets.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

What is a ethical kill?

A cartridge you can hit "MOP" or some big cannon can't hit the the broadside of Mount Everest and have to reload 5 times spraying and praying for a hit!

You know how many people who use a 375 H&H and cannot hit "MOP" at 200 yards off the bench!

If you really need a 375 H&H to knock down a poor little Elk, you seriously have a problem!

I watch a fella stop his Ford pickup in the middle of a jeep trail in New Mexico and drop a 6x7 at 300 yards with a 7mm Rem Mag using 150 grain Nosler Partition. OK it's .023 of an inch bigger than the 25-06 and 3/4 of a 22 bullet heavier or 530 foot pound of energy difference, that's right only 530 foot pounds at 300 yards. You really think and Elk is going to tell teh difference in 530 foot pounds of energy!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I often experienced difficulty dropping a moose (six of them) or elk (thirteen of those) with "good shots" from 180 grain 30-06. I can't imagine trying to do it with 25-06 or .243. Guys who would try that when I was a young man would be sharply criticized. And for good reason. My first monster bull elk took a hard hit right through the neck that didn't phase him. The second shot straight through the pooper was the one that was killing him when I finally caught up and put one in the back of his head. Shot one bull moose TWICE in the neck with one of the bullets lodging in his spinal chord. STILL he kept going. My first Canadian bull moose took a shot in the heart and he was still trying to keep going by the time I got to him a hundred yards away. I have rarely knocked an elk or moose over with even a well-placed shot from 30-06. This includes a calf moose also shot through the neck. I have thought many times about bumping up to a 300 Win Mag. I would never contemplate downsizing. No way! If an elk will stand still broadside in the open at fifty yards and give me a good bi-pod rest, yeah I could probably put one in his eye with a .22 magnum and drop him like a sack of hammers. But I have shot a lot of elk and moose (and pushed up a lot of others) and haven't had one yet who presented me with that kind of shot. Sorry, Clay, but I think experience speaks louder here than statistics.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ye might get away with it! Careful bullet placement will win out. For the overwhelming majority of the population, however, it's all luck, and it's important to drain the blood.

But I'll back what you said, a little bit.

I drove a deer up to within 10' of my hunting partner who was sitting on a stump with a 7 Mag.

He actually missed with the first shot.

The second shot hit the abdomen and the the intestines fell out on the ground.

The deer ran off.

If it hadn't been for The Gypsy (rest her soul) we never would have found that deer.

You never know what may happen to divert your aim.

There are so many people hunting here that there is no such thing as a stationary elk.

You won't believe how fast they can go through the bushes with those huge racks.

You got to hit them moving with something that will let the blood out.

For an inexperienced hunter to take a shot with a small caliber or underpowered rifle is to act on bad advice.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

blackdawgz

To act on bad advice?

You have any idea how many hunters I had to deal with who received bad advice? OMG!

A 270 with 130 grain works fantastic for Caribou. I know of a idiot who just have to have a 375 H&H (sounds familiar) who couldn't sight it in on the bench, I had to sight it in for him. He shot a triple shovel Bull which was never to be recovered and knocked down three Cows all with one shot!

It's not the arrow

It's the Indian!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ontario Honker

Hey Bro!

Neck shots? Not a good idea :)

You want the bullet placement just behind the front leg and just quarter or a third of the way up right in that area, that's the sweet spot. You will blow out if not the heart, you will still take out the lungs shutting down the boiler department. Jugular veins in the neck unless you hit them your depending on hydrostatic shock also known as bullet cavitation to take them out. It's this reason I don't like and avoid neck shots and only take the "David Petzal's Infallible Shoulder Shot" if I really do need to anchor them knowing meat loss will be the result of.

You can talk about neck shot and spinal shots all day. If your capable of taking these shots, then you are more than capable of making the proper shot of "Downing The Brown" with a boiler room shot!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay Cooper-
I saw a cow elk hit square in the boilerhouse with a 165 gr. '06, and never slow down. Bullet went through her right behind the front leg, through her heart, and exited right next to her left tenderloin. I will stick with the shoulder shot, which is what brought her down for good. JMVHNSO!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

If that bullet went through the heart, she was not going far. But you don't know that when they take off!

If they are still on their feet, I'm still shooting too! The only elk or deer I ever lost was from a shoulder (?) hit that I was so confident of that I failed to follow up with another shot while he was still in range. Never again......

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

crm3006

Elk and Moose are different, Elk can take one hell of a punishment like Jack Rabbits. It all depends how pumped up and spooked they are.

WA Mtnhunter is right!

And may I add

Unless you have someone standing over you spotting your shots watching the wake of the bullet and impact, better follow up with another shot. One thing nice as about a 25-06, you can recover faster for that second shot. But I know one thing, those fast little pill in the boiler room sure churns up (cavitation/hydrostatic shock) the lung tissue and bleeds profusely!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

WAM, those Elk you shot. Did they head for the rough stuff or just take off in any direction? All the ones I've seen, will darn near dive off a cliff or head for the most knurliest stuff to get away

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The only elk I ever had escape after the shot actually ran about 30 yards then slowed and sauntered uphill through some thick stuff and just kept going, and going, and going. I was standing there after the shot watching and waiting for him to fall over, particularly after he slowed down after the initail run following the hit. I had opportunity to hit him again, but I was overconfident that I made a good hit and he would not get too far. Two miles and 5 hours proved me wrong on that when the trail was lost.

Your observation is correct. I have seen them do both up or down a sheer slope (usually down) or do the dive into the thick stuff. If disturbed, they are going to unass the AO, so don't miss!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay, you're assuming that I "chose" to shoot the animal in the neck. Offhand I can only recall once where it was an option. You shoot at what's available. Take a look at my first bull. Tell me you wouln't take a neck shot if that's all you could see (and that's all I could see except his horns). Mind you, I wouldn't take a butt shot (unless I was desparate to stop something that was wounded) but the neck is not a bad place to put a bullet if that's the best that's available. I've also had a few problems after they've been shot behind the shoulder. These are big animals. Not deer. They can take some punishment. A lot more than a 25-06 normally dishes out.

And I don't know who told you that elk can take more punishment than moose. Moose have a thicker hide (much thicker). They also have heavier bones. It is not logical to think that they would be whimpier. I've shot my share of both. Can't say as I have seen any difference.

I sure as heck would not be trying to place a .243 or 25-06 in the shoulder of an elk or moose! If you're off even a bit and that flimsy bullet actually hits the shoulder bones instead of behind it ... well, the bullet is not going through the animal. If it's a moose, it might not get through the shoulder. A full grown moose or elk on three legs is pretty much lost, especially if it's a front leg. And no, I wouldn't try placing a .243 or 25-06 in the neck of a moose or elk. Might have a bit better luck now that I've bumped up to 200 grain boattails. Boiler room shots? Yes, they usually do take the animal out ... if you can find it when it's died. Half the time a chunk of fat plugs the hole and the animal stops bleeding. Especially if there's no snow, you're really taking a big chance with gut shots. And if you pop that elk or moose in the guts at the end of the day, you stand a good chance of not finding it till morning. By then it will be bird food.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ontario Honker

I never said 25-06 would be good for Moose. If I was going to use a 25-06 on Elk, it would be in New Mexico or Arizona in more open country. Up in Colorado or other places were a step would be in the gnarliest and steepest place on earth, since I do own a 338 Win Mag I would choose it first and my 30-06 with 180 grain Nosler Partitions would be its back up. Use the right cartridge for the conditions you’re in like open country wouldn't give a second thought using my 25-06, being in the rough I agree use a bigger anchor!

As for Moose, yes the hide is tougher and what I have found using ultra velocity Magnums pushing the bullet within 150-200 yards above the maximum recommended working velocity including difficulty handling those cannons is the result of lost game! Not only bullets have a tendency to blow up within this range, they also tumble because they didn’t have enough distance to stabilize in flight. Calibers less than 308 and heavy weight are long are very prone to this.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

One more thing to know. When I was in AK, people would ask me what would be the best cartridge. I would say nothing less than 30 cal and no smaller than a 30-06. That was the "Gold Standard" the guides and Biologist used. Of course, Caribou and Black Bear, you don't need a cannon, but you never know when Ol'Ben would slip around!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay,that sounds like what we have been saying.The best shot I've ever hunted with uses a 22/250 for deer.He owns larger guns but thats what he always carrys.We don't have elk or moose just deer or hogs.I think half the hunters around here bought 22/250s because of him,thinking they would have the same result. Wrong,it was the man.Thats also why most need a medium caliber for the game their after.In order to break shoulders and bone if hit less than perfect.Most hunters have no business carying a small caliber or a very large caliber.They can't shoot the small one well enough and with the cannon they can't learn.Buy the Gold Standard (30/060 or something very close to it.IMO

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

stanleyda

I can understand what you are saying, but you will find for those who own 25-06's are generally the more experienced hunters.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

stanleyda

Pulled the trigger to soon

You have a valid point, 25-06 or cartridges larger than 30-06 for Elk is not for everybody. I've watched countless of shooters at the range flinching so bad couldn't hit paper at 100 yards with those cannons! Fun to watch those.454 Casull shooters shoot the ground at 30-40 yards out aiming at a target 50 yard out 5-6 feet off the ground.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I agree Clay,I hunted around nuts that would wound deer and then go and buy a bigger gun.When they couldn't shoot the one they had.One lease I was on in Ga. had just such a fool,he hunted with a 25shortmag,270win and lost a number of deer.He is now carrying a 338mag and I couldn't keep my mouth shut and got on him about it.I'm no longer hunting on that lease.There are some that will never look at themselves as the problem,wound game must be the gun.Miss a deer, scope must be off.I could never be that easy on myself,thats were most should look. first.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

We have a friend who is no longer welcomed back to the ranch where we hunt because of his poor shooting, mostly with large magnum cartridges and multiple brands of ammo and different rifles. He just could not bring himself to believe that he was the problem. My buddy says he has the biggest pre-bang flinch he has ever seen. A few years ago, he shot at a mule deer 7 frigging times before finally wounding it in the hind quarter. His son killed it two days later in hte same area. He could not even keep rouds on the paper at 300 yards at the range. Sad.

I asked him why didn't he try going back to a .308 Win or a .270 and shoot that to improve his shooting. He said you needed a magnum for elk. You can always tell 'em, some you just can't tell 'em much...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Back in 1980 that's the reason why I switched from 300 Win Mag to the 25-06. Part of it was to recoil and blast; I realized at an early age you didn’t need a cannon on a lot of game and besides the 06 is fun to shoot!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

In answer to the question, I would say that yes, a 117g 25-06 bullet WILL ethically kill an elk. That long bullet has tremendous penetration and shocking power and I find that it penetrates bone and even steel better than many much larger caliber bullets just like the 6.5mm bullet does. I have done a variety of penetration tests even on steel, bone and a variety of substances... there is no doubt from what I have seen. Elk are tough and strong... however they don't wear kevlar. If you shoot them in a VITAL location within 200 yards, this bullet will give you the same result as a 180g 30-06 as it passes through an elk. That being said, my preference for elk is my .300 Dakota because it can do the same thing at a longer distance and it has even more hydraulic shocking power. I have no interest in actually shooting elk with my 25-06 because it is just too marginal for such a once in a life time opportunity. Like Ontario Honker said, in real hunting you don't get to pick the situation and you have to be prepared for much less than desirable conditions.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I don't shoot enough shells in a year to get flinchy. Unless the scope got knocked off real bad and takes some work to sight in, it's an exceptionally wasteful year if I shoot five rounds. I'll never waste ammo (or my shoulder) trying to lob bullets into game a half mile away and I guess that's probably the big difference in my ammo consumption as opposed to others. My personal comfort is not important. Killing is serious business and I am obligated to do the best I can to reduce the animal's suffering and waste of meat. I won't use marginal or excessive calibres and I don't approve of any claims that they are ethical. Not in anyone's hands.

You know, no sane person would think of going after a grizzly bear with a 25-06 or a .243. But I've shot elk and moose that were as big as many good-sized grizzly bears. The difference is that a big griz might just rip your head off if you muck up a shot. Sometimes I think we need to pretend that deer and elk have sharp teeth and claws. That way they might get the respect and treatment from hunters they deserve.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The 25-06 is the smallest recommended cartridge recommended for Elk. Since I reload and worked up pet loads that shoot along other loads, personally I would use a 120 grain Nosler Partition. In the past few years, ammunition manufacturers have turned the shooting world upside down. To answer your question the best, you need to find a source of available ammunition you need. A 115 to 120 grain that will not blowup upon impact, Nosler Partition, Barnes, A-Frame and Hornady just came out with a new bullet similar to the Barnes. I know this is a general answer, but with all the darn good choices out there now and what is available in your area is hard to recommend. Remember to buy enough to sight in with, do a little plinking at medium and long range to get the feel of the load and to hunt with.

Moishe

Talking from experience, 375 H&H or better put, all the fire power in the world will not do you any good if you cannot hit with it and follow up on repeated shot. But the best Bear protection as I said before is a small pocket size 22 pistol and a pair of tennis shoes. When the Bear charges, you shoot your buddy in the ankle and run like HELL!

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from tony167n wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

im sure it would work if you hit it in the right spot and try not to shoot through heavy bone. but its just my opinion that you should have at least a 30-06 for elk prefereably bigger, like a .300 mag. but im sure it will work and good luck hunting.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from babsfish4life wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I would fill my pockets with rocks to throw at it too! Do yourself and the elk a service by using a bigger caliber. 270, 30-06, 7mm are minimum in my eyes.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The year before last one of the guys in our party took his elk with that round. However it did take two shots to put it on the ground. With any round it is all about shot placement.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Elk have been killed with even smaller or less powerful rounds.That said even those that love the 25/06 would tell you it's not a elk round.(Always use enough gun)

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from varmit slayer wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I wouldnt use a 25/06 on anything bigger than mulies.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Sourdough Dave

A +1 for you

From Clays archives of bookmarks, places, information and things to read,

ken.mcloud said it best!

“So, I think that the superior killing power of larger rounds is largely in our heads.(likely testosterone induced) A flat-shooting round that you can accurately place will produce as many if not more "bang-flop" kills as a heavy caliber round.”

Disclaimer: This opinion does not constitute legal advice. Please consult an attorney licensed to pratice in your jurisdiction. Wear sunscreen, protective eyewear, and hearing protection. Buckle your seatbelt. Call your mother. -- The Armchair Outfitter

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

A many of Elk have been successfully taken with 243 105 grain soft points

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Has anyone seen what a 25-06 120 Nosler Partition does? WOW!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Well placed it'd likely do fine, but there are surely better(bigger) choices.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

steve182 a +1 for you, regardless what your using, Ive witnessed Moose hunters empty there 375 H&H and 460 Weatherbys three times and still had to trailem almost to Russia!

The #1 recommended cartridge for Elk is the 338 Win Mag, not to big and not to small. But I still wouldn't give it a second thought of using my 25-06!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamaoutlaw wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Iam not knocking anyones faith in a caliber.But a 25-06 is barely legal to hunt whitetail in the state where i live.I would say that there have been a lot of elk killed with smaller rifles,while they were more than likely well placed shots at moderate distances.I wouldn't advocate this caliber for hunting elk for everyone it's just to light and there are far too many varibles.JIMO

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

What is a ethical kill?

A cartridge you can hit "MOP" or some big cannon can't hit the the broadside of Mount Everest and have to reload 5 times spraying and praying for a hit!

You know how many people who use a 375 H&H and cannot hit "MOP" at 200 yards off the bench!

If you really need a 375 H&H to knock down a poor little Elk, you seriously have a problem!

I watch a fella stop his Ford pickup in the middle of a jeep trail in New Mexico and drop a 6x7 at 300 yards with a 7mm Rem Mag using 150 grain Nosler Partition. OK it's .023 of an inch bigger than the 25-06 and 3/4 of a 22 bullet heavier or 530 foot pound of energy difference, that's right only 530 foot pounds at 300 yards. You really think and Elk is going to tell teh difference in 530 foot pounds of energy!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I often experienced difficulty dropping a moose (six of them) or elk (thirteen of those) with "good shots" from 180 grain 30-06. I can't imagine trying to do it with 25-06 or .243. Guys who would try that when I was a young man would be sharply criticized. And for good reason. My first monster bull elk took a hard hit right through the neck that didn't phase him. The second shot straight through the pooper was the one that was killing him when I finally caught up and put one in the back of his head. Shot one bull moose TWICE in the neck with one of the bullets lodging in his spinal chord. STILL he kept going. My first Canadian bull moose took a shot in the heart and he was still trying to keep going by the time I got to him a hundred yards away. I have rarely knocked an elk or moose over with even a well-placed shot from 30-06. This includes a calf moose also shot through the neck. I have thought many times about bumping up to a 300 Win Mag. I would never contemplate downsizing. No way! If an elk will stand still broadside in the open at fifty yards and give me a good bi-pod rest, yeah I could probably put one in his eye with a .22 magnum and drop him like a sack of hammers. But I have shot a lot of elk and moose (and pushed up a lot of others) and haven't had one yet who presented me with that kind of shot. Sorry, Clay, but I think experience speaks louder here than statistics.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

blackdawgz

To act on bad advice?

You have any idea how many hunters I had to deal with who received bad advice? OMG!

A 270 with 130 grain works fantastic for Caribou. I know of a idiot who just have to have a 375 H&H (sounds familiar) who couldn't sight it in on the bench, I had to sight it in for him. He shot a triple shovel Bull which was never to be recovered and knocked down three Cows all with one shot!

It's not the arrow

It's the Indian!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ontario Honker

Hey Bro!

Neck shots? Not a good idea :)

You want the bullet placement just behind the front leg and just quarter or a third of the way up right in that area, that's the sweet spot. You will blow out if not the heart, you will still take out the lungs shutting down the boiler department. Jugular veins in the neck unless you hit them your depending on hydrostatic shock also known as bullet cavitation to take them out. It's this reason I don't like and avoid neck shots and only take the "David Petzal's Infallible Shoulder Shot" if I really do need to anchor them knowing meat loss will be the result of.

You can talk about neck shot and spinal shots all day. If your capable of taking these shots, then you are more than capable of making the proper shot of "Downing The Brown" with a boiler room shot!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay, you're assuming that I "chose" to shoot the animal in the neck. Offhand I can only recall once where it was an option. You shoot at what's available. Take a look at my first bull. Tell me you wouln't take a neck shot if that's all you could see (and that's all I could see except his horns). Mind you, I wouldn't take a butt shot (unless I was desparate to stop something that was wounded) but the neck is not a bad place to put a bullet if that's the best that's available. I've also had a few problems after they've been shot behind the shoulder. These are big animals. Not deer. They can take some punishment. A lot more than a 25-06 normally dishes out.

And I don't know who told you that elk can take more punishment than moose. Moose have a thicker hide (much thicker). They also have heavier bones. It is not logical to think that they would be whimpier. I've shot my share of both. Can't say as I have seen any difference.

I sure as heck would not be trying to place a .243 or 25-06 in the shoulder of an elk or moose! If you're off even a bit and that flimsy bullet actually hits the shoulder bones instead of behind it ... well, the bullet is not going through the animal. If it's a moose, it might not get through the shoulder. A full grown moose or elk on three legs is pretty much lost, especially if it's a front leg. And no, I wouldn't try placing a .243 or 25-06 in the neck of a moose or elk. Might have a bit better luck now that I've bumped up to 200 grain boattails. Boiler room shots? Yes, they usually do take the animal out ... if you can find it when it's died. Half the time a chunk of fat plugs the hole and the animal stops bleeding. Especially if there's no snow, you're really taking a big chance with gut shots. And if you pop that elk or moose in the guts at the end of the day, you stand a good chance of not finding it till morning. By then it will be bird food.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay,that sounds like what we have been saying.The best shot I've ever hunted with uses a 22/250 for deer.He owns larger guns but thats what he always carrys.We don't have elk or moose just deer or hogs.I think half the hunters around here bought 22/250s because of him,thinking they would have the same result. Wrong,it was the man.Thats also why most need a medium caliber for the game their after.In order to break shoulders and bone if hit less than perfect.Most hunters have no business carying a small caliber or a very large caliber.They can't shoot the small one well enough and with the cannon they can't learn.Buy the Gold Standard (30/060 or something very close to it.IMO

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I took this question as if it were from a new elk hunter or average hunter who does not reload.One who doesn't shoot hundreds if not thousands of rounds a year.I reload and shoot hundreds of rounds so if I were out deer hunting I too would shoot a elk with my 270win.(Barnes tsx).That said I wouldn't leave the house to go on a elk hunt with that gun must less a 25/06,Iwould take my 30/06 or Rem7mmmag they too would be topped with barnes tsx bullets.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Clay Cooper-
I saw a cow elk hit square in the boilerhouse with a 165 gr. '06, and never slow down. Bullet went through her right behind the front leg, through her heart, and exited right next to her left tenderloin. I will stick with the shoulder shot, which is what brought her down for good. JMVHNSO!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

If that bullet went through the heart, she was not going far. But you don't know that when they take off!

If they are still on their feet, I'm still shooting too! The only elk or deer I ever lost was from a shoulder (?) hit that I was so confident of that I failed to follow up with another shot while he was still in range. Never again......

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

WAM, those Elk you shot. Did they head for the rough stuff or just take off in any direction? All the ones I've seen, will darn near dive off a cliff or head for the most knurliest stuff to get away

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

The only elk I ever had escape after the shot actually ran about 30 yards then slowed and sauntered uphill through some thick stuff and just kept going, and going, and going. I was standing there after the shot watching and waiting for him to fall over, particularly after he slowed down after the initail run following the hit. I had opportunity to hit him again, but I was overconfident that I made a good hit and he would not get too far. Two miles and 5 hours proved me wrong on that when the trail was lost.

Your observation is correct. I have seen them do both up or down a sheer slope (usually down) or do the dive into the thick stuff. If disturbed, they are going to unass the AO, so don't miss!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

We have a friend who is no longer welcomed back to the ranch where we hunt because of his poor shooting, mostly with large magnum cartridges and multiple brands of ammo and different rifles. He just could not bring himself to believe that he was the problem. My buddy says he has the biggest pre-bang flinch he has ever seen. A few years ago, he shot at a mule deer 7 frigging times before finally wounding it in the hind quarter. His son killed it two days later in hte same area. He could not even keep rouds on the paper at 300 yards at the range. Sad.

I asked him why didn't he try going back to a .308 Win or a .270 and shoot that to improve his shooting. He said you needed a magnum for elk. You can always tell 'em, some you just can't tell 'em much...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

In answer to the question, I would say that yes, a 117g 25-06 bullet WILL ethically kill an elk. That long bullet has tremendous penetration and shocking power and I find that it penetrates bone and even steel better than many much larger caliber bullets just like the 6.5mm bullet does. I have done a variety of penetration tests even on steel, bone and a variety of substances... there is no doubt from what I have seen. Elk are tough and strong... however they don't wear kevlar. If you shoot them in a VITAL location within 200 yards, this bullet will give you the same result as a 180g 30-06 as it passes through an elk. That being said, my preference for elk is my .300 Dakota because it can do the same thing at a longer distance and it has even more hydraulic shocking power. I have no interest in actually shooting elk with my 25-06 because it is just too marginal for such a once in a life time opportunity. Like Ontario Honker said, in real hunting you don't get to pick the situation and you have to be prepared for much less than desirable conditions.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

crm3006

Elk and Moose are different, Elk can take one hell of a punishment like Jack Rabbits. It all depends how pumped up and spooked they are.

WA Mtnhunter is right!

And may I add

Unless you have someone standing over you spotting your shots watching the wake of the bullet and impact, better follow up with another shot. One thing nice as about a 25-06, you can recover faster for that second shot. But I know one thing, those fast little pill in the boiler room sure churns up (cavitation/hydrostatic shock) the lung tissue and bleeds profusely!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

stanleyda

Pulled the trigger to soon

You have a valid point, 25-06 or cartridges larger than 30-06 for Elk is not for everybody. I've watched countless of shooters at the range flinching so bad couldn't hit paper at 100 yards with those cannons! Fun to watch those.454 Casull shooters shoot the ground at 30-40 yards out aiming at a target 50 yard out 5-6 feet off the ground.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from stanleyda wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I agree Clay,I hunted around nuts that would wound deer and then go and buy a bigger gun.When they couldn't shoot the one they had.One lease I was on in Ga. had just such a fool,he hunted with a 25shortmag,270win and lost a number of deer.He is now carrying a 338mag and I couldn't keep my mouth shut and got on him about it.I'm no longer hunting on that lease.There are some that will never look at themselves as the problem,wound game must be the gun.Miss a deer, scope must be off.I could never be that easy on myself,thats were most should look. first.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I don't shoot enough shells in a year to get flinchy. Unless the scope got knocked off real bad and takes some work to sight in, it's an exceptionally wasteful year if I shoot five rounds. I'll never waste ammo (or my shoulder) trying to lob bullets into game a half mile away and I guess that's probably the big difference in my ammo consumption as opposed to others. My personal comfort is not important. Killing is serious business and I am obligated to do the best I can to reduce the animal's suffering and waste of meat. I won't use marginal or excessive calibres and I don't approve of any claims that they are ethical. Not in anyone's hands.

You know, no sane person would think of going after a grizzly bear with a 25-06 or a .243. But I've shot elk and moose that were as big as many good-sized grizzly bears. The difference is that a big griz might just rip your head off if you muck up a shot. Sometimes I think we need to pretend that deer and elk have sharp teeth and claws. That way they might get the respect and treatment from hunters they deserve.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I know that Ol' Clay like the 25/06, but he shoots much better than I, so I use a 30/06 unless I am where big grizzly's roam then it's a 375 H&H just in case.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ye might get away with it! Careful bullet placement will win out. For the overwhelming majority of the population, however, it's all luck, and it's important to drain the blood.

But I'll back what you said, a little bit.

I drove a deer up to within 10' of my hunting partner who was sitting on a stump with a 7 Mag.

He actually missed with the first shot.

The second shot hit the abdomen and the the intestines fell out on the ground.

The deer ran off.

If it hadn't been for The Gypsy (rest her soul) we never would have found that deer.

You never know what may happen to divert your aim.

There are so many people hunting here that there is no such thing as a stationary elk.

You won't believe how fast they can go through the bushes with those huge racks.

You got to hit them moving with something that will let the blood out.

For an inexperienced hunter to take a shot with a small caliber or underpowered rifle is to act on bad advice.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Ontario Honker

I never said 25-06 would be good for Moose. If I was going to use a 25-06 on Elk, it would be in New Mexico or Arizona in more open country. Up in Colorado or other places were a step would be in the gnarliest and steepest place on earth, since I do own a 338 Win Mag I would choose it first and my 30-06 with 180 grain Nosler Partitions would be its back up. Use the right cartridge for the conditions you’re in like open country wouldn't give a second thought using my 25-06, being in the rough I agree use a bigger anchor!

As for Moose, yes the hide is tougher and what I have found using ultra velocity Magnums pushing the bullet within 150-200 yards above the maximum recommended working velocity including difficulty handling those cannons is the result of lost game! Not only bullets have a tendency to blow up within this range, they also tumble because they didn’t have enough distance to stabilize in flight. Calibers less than 308 and heavy weight are long are very prone to this.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

One more thing to know. When I was in AK, people would ask me what would be the best cartridge. I would say nothing less than 30 cal and no smaller than a 30-06. That was the "Gold Standard" the guides and Biologist used. Of course, Caribou and Black Bear, you don't need a cannon, but you never know when Ol'Ben would slip around!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

stanleyda

I can understand what you are saying, but you will find for those who own 25-06's are generally the more experienced hunters.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Back in 1980 that's the reason why I switched from 300 Win Mag to the 25-06. Part of it was to recoil and blast; I realized at an early age you didn’t need a cannon on a lot of game and besides the 06 is fun to shoot!

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

bmxbiz-fs