Q:
I was in a local gun shop a few months ago when a guy stromed in with a winchester XP3 bullet he pulled out of an elk. He walked over to the owner of the store and began to tell him what a piece of crap product he had sold him and demanded a refund. The owner cooly asked why where he go that bullet he was holding and why he wasn't satisfied with the product. The guy told him he pulled it out of his bull he shot and he was mad because the expanded bullet didn't look like the advertised picture. The owner simply asked did you shoot that elk with more than that one bulet? No he responded, and the owner said something like well, the elk is dead isn't it, looks like that bullet worked just fine. Dumbfounded, the gentleman walked out of the store.
I couldn't believe the nerve of that guy while I was standing there. But it got me thinking about how people measure bullet performance. Do you measure it by how pretty the mushroom is or by how it actually performs on game?
I've shot several elk using Berger VLD's and their mushrooms well they're really nonexistant but their wound cavities are larger than any other bullet I've used, even bigger than Barne's TSX. I would not hesitate to use a Berger on anything in NA. I'm curious what you folks look for in a hunting bullet, a pretty mushroom, or actual results on game?
Question by BigBboy25. Uploaded on March 11, 2010
Answers (17)
The bullet I pulled out of a spike this year was a 245 grain hallow point Powerbelt from my muzzle loader. The mushroom was not pretty, but the deer dropped in its tracks and I did not hit it the heart or the spine. Just a double lung shot. Both lungs looked like scrambled eggs. I found the bullet while skinning it. It was held up on the opposite side in hide. I will deffinitally keep useing the Powerbelts.
This guy is an idiot. Just goes to show that some people will complain about anything.
Once a bullet leaves the barrel no one has any further control over it. The mushroomed bullets used for the advertising are recovered from ballistic gel or similar medium and fired into it at the best angle for optimum expansion performance. Just as a photographer picks the best looking model for his advertising spread, they will pick the best looking mushroomed bullet out of several fired for that advertisement. To pull one out of an elk and expect it to look like the photo is like buying the outfit the model wore and expecting to look like the model when you put it on. That guy had been obviously watching way too much reality TV.
Price and performance. I've been using Winchester super X's for decades in my .270 and have been feeding my family venison the whole time. The price is right, and they flat-out work. If I were hunting elk, or moose I'd probably spring for some pricier loads, but for whitetail, I personally haven't seen any need for 'upgrading' to a pricier round.
I only pay attention to my muzzleloader rounds. I could really care less what they look like if the animal is dead on the ground but it's interesting to see how each round reacts to bone or flesh.
And people say I'm crazy using a 55 grain pill at 3800fps on Mule deer?
Lets see if I get this right?
Berger VLD's blow up like a bomb causing massive hydrostatic damage making the boiler room into soup while my 55 grain does the same basic job on deer.
Berger VLD's work in the same manner as a frangible bullet. If you shot a roast with a Barnes, you will get a hole clean through it. If you shot it with a frangible bullet, you got instant hamburger, the energy of the bullet is fully absorbed into the tissue.
All that extra foot pound energy is useless if it blows out the other side!
I like to see game on the ground with little to no muss or fuss. If I can dig out a slug to examine, that's a bonus (see the .454 slug picture on my profile). If you didn't have to bloodtrial, the task was performed well.
The deer and elk I have shot have not complained nor come back to life, so I guess what I'm using works.
Controlled expansion is what I look for. I'm not a fan of overly explosive bullets in any gun. I love the Nosler partition bullet even though I know many today have switched to other equally fine bullets that provide classic expansion along with deep penetration.
You actually recover bullets? Just kidding ... sort of. More results oriented but I am not a fan of fragmenting bullets on edible game - prefer controlled expansion and penetration. I am not overly concerned about bang-flops, though - perhaps that is due to bow hunting and the usual need to track.
I'm only concerned with a bullet's accuracy and its results. On deer and varmints, most commercial bullets do the job for which they are intended and very few that I shoot stay in the deer for recovery. I usually temper my speed for anything I want to eat so the prime steaks aren't hanging on the bushes. I don't shoot deer with frangible bullets because they take the steaks out with them. I don't consider the Berger to be a frangible bullet like the Sierra Match King. It has enough jacket to hold together pretty well and sure sounds like Bigboy has had good results. I like the Bergers for long range shooting because of their great Ballistic Coefficient but I haven't shot anything with them yet. I am spoiled with too many other good bullets to have tried them for huntng yet. I am practicing with 210 Bergers though for my 1000 yard elk.
That's an old story, heard it years ago.
Honestly if I get good groups at the range and my game falls where I shoot him or a few steps away i'm happy.
Jim in Mo was right, I heard this story long time ago!!!
My buddy and I laugh about this very thing all the time. He says that we have killed everything for the past 40 years with plain jane Sierra Game King and Pro Hunter bullets before someone told us we couldn't kill deer with them anymore we had to have some kind of super bullets.
I could care less if the bullet looks pretty. If it doesn't perform well, it will get the hammer treatment and be thrown out the window.
Post an Answer
This guy is an idiot. Just goes to show that some people will complain about anything.
Once a bullet leaves the barrel no one has any further control over it. The mushroomed bullets used for the advertising are recovered from ballistic gel or similar medium and fired into it at the best angle for optimum expansion performance. Just as a photographer picks the best looking model for his advertising spread, they will pick the best looking mushroomed bullet out of several fired for that advertisement. To pull one out of an elk and expect it to look like the photo is like buying the outfit the model wore and expecting to look like the model when you put it on. That guy had been obviously watching way too much reality TV.
The bullet I pulled out of a spike this year was a 245 grain hallow point Powerbelt from my muzzle loader. The mushroom was not pretty, but the deer dropped in its tracks and I did not hit it the heart or the spine. Just a double lung shot. Both lungs looked like scrambled eggs. I found the bullet while skinning it. It was held up on the opposite side in hide. I will deffinitally keep useing the Powerbelts.
Price and performance. I've been using Winchester super X's for decades in my .270 and have been feeding my family venison the whole time. The price is right, and they flat-out work. If I were hunting elk, or moose I'd probably spring for some pricier loads, but for whitetail, I personally haven't seen any need for 'upgrading' to a pricier round.
I only pay attention to my muzzleloader rounds. I could really care less what they look like if the animal is dead on the ground but it's interesting to see how each round reacts to bone or flesh.
And people say I'm crazy using a 55 grain pill at 3800fps on Mule deer?
Lets see if I get this right?
Berger VLD's blow up like a bomb causing massive hydrostatic damage making the boiler room into soup while my 55 grain does the same basic job on deer.
Berger VLD's work in the same manner as a frangible bullet. If you shot a roast with a Barnes, you will get a hole clean through it. If you shot it with a frangible bullet, you got instant hamburger, the energy of the bullet is fully absorbed into the tissue.
All that extra foot pound energy is useless if it blows out the other side!
I like to see game on the ground with little to no muss or fuss. If I can dig out a slug to examine, that's a bonus (see the .454 slug picture on my profile). If you didn't have to bloodtrial, the task was performed well.
The deer and elk I have shot have not complained nor come back to life, so I guess what I'm using works.
Controlled expansion is what I look for. I'm not a fan of overly explosive bullets in any gun. I love the Nosler partition bullet even though I know many today have switched to other equally fine bullets that provide classic expansion along with deep penetration.
You actually recover bullets? Just kidding ... sort of. More results oriented but I am not a fan of fragmenting bullets on edible game - prefer controlled expansion and penetration. I am not overly concerned about bang-flops, though - perhaps that is due to bow hunting and the usual need to track.
I'm only concerned with a bullet's accuracy and its results. On deer and varmints, most commercial bullets do the job for which they are intended and very few that I shoot stay in the deer for recovery. I usually temper my speed for anything I want to eat so the prime steaks aren't hanging on the bushes. I don't shoot deer with frangible bullets because they take the steaks out with them. I don't consider the Berger to be a frangible bullet like the Sierra Match King. It has enough jacket to hold together pretty well and sure sounds like Bigboy has had good results. I like the Bergers for long range shooting because of their great Ballistic Coefficient but I haven't shot anything with them yet. I am spoiled with too many other good bullets to have tried them for huntng yet. I am practicing with 210 Bergers though for my 1000 yard elk.
Honestly if I get good groups at the range and my game falls where I shoot him or a few steps away i'm happy.
My buddy and I laugh about this very thing all the time. He says that we have killed everything for the past 40 years with plain jane Sierra Game King and Pro Hunter bullets before someone told us we couldn't kill deer with them anymore we had to have some kind of super bullets.
That's an old story, heard it years ago.
Jim in Mo was right, I heard this story long time ago!!!
I could care less if the bullet looks pretty. If it doesn't perform well, it will get the hammer treatment and be thrown out the window.
Post an Answer