Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
what range of animals is a 270 good for?

Question by littledeer. Uploaded on January 21, 2012

Answers (13)

Top Rated
All Answers
from bruisedsausage wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Just about any animal In North America. The exception might be large bears. (although it would do the job) But reliably you could hunt anything from coyotes to Moose with it. The .270 is a great caliber.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from A Wild Beast at... wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Bruised Sausage presents it in a nice way. The 270 Winchester can be used for just about any game in North America.

Please, read my blog at http://awildbeastatheart.blogspot.com

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

I agree, assuming you choose (or handload) the right bullet and place it properly, I consider the versatile .270 Win appropriate for any game on the North American continent with the exception of brown bear. As a deer and antelope cartridge, you'd be hard-pressed to improve upon it. The .270 is "overkill" for varmint, but it'll perform well on small game with the right bullet. Are you considering the purchase of a rifle chambered for the .270 Win?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

The range of a 270 on Game 400-1,000 Yards
Check out "History of the 270W" on line.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

As stated above, the .270 will bring down anything around these parts. It's a great, flat-shooting round. I personally feel it's a little light for the really large stuff (moose, elk, bear), but it's awesome for deer and antelope. It will do the job on larger game, but your shot placement becomes more critical.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

Anything in the continental U.S. However, I consider it too heavy for varmint hunting small animals like prairie dogs and wood chucks. It will certainly kill them but it has too much recoil to make it enjoyable. .270 caliber bullets just aren't light enough. To hit that end of the spectrum, you have to take the .270 down a notch to the .25-06 but with that you give up the top end of the U.S. hunting spectrum.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

I've killed everything from coyotes to elk with mine. It is an excellent caliber, too often under rated.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from scratchgolf72 wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

damn near everything, its a great flat shooting rifle that has multiple applications in the big game woods. anything from antelope to elk and black bear.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

Not a fan.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ALJoe wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

No need to add my two cents, ya'll pretty much said it all. I have successfully shot everything from bobcats to elk. It is a very very good all around caliber. I do most all of my deer hunting with the .270.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from GetOutThere wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

I agree you can take any animal in North America with good shot placement, but you can also do that with a .22 Mag. I believe this caliber is suited for thinner skinned animal, from Deer on down. You just don't have the penetration at longer ranges if you were to miis your shot and hit bone. This is a good caliber for closer shots on big game though. It is also a good starter caliber for any one as it has less recoil than say a .30 caliber.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 17 weeks 1 day ago

GetOutThere,
Although I prefer other cartridges to the .270 myself, I certainly would not compare the .270 to a .22 Mag. A 150g Barnes TTSX will still be traveling at about 2400 fps with 1800 foot pounds of energy at 300 yards. That bullet has excellent penetration and a deer or even elk is carrying nothing to defend against a projectile with that terminal performance. Have you ever seen one of these bullets hit anything? The only limitation on the .270 in the lower 48 is its effective range. If your shots are inside 300 yards, you will be fine for anything we've got. With all cartridges you have to hit them in a vital area or you will have a mess. Come to think of it, I have seen more 30-06 and .300 Winny messes than .270 messes... mainly because more people have them I guess.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 15 weeks 4 days ago

I shot my first whitetail with a .270 in 1976. Had to have one of my own after that. Moved to Oregon in '77 and bought a used Rem. 760 Gamemaster, .270 for myself for my birthday and have never regretted it one bit. Most flat shooting rifle I ever shot, have had the honor of filling many blacktail tags as well as 7 Roosevelt bull elk tags. Has always been spot on!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from bruisedsausage wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Just about any animal In North America. The exception might be large bears. (although it would do the job) But reliably you could hunt anything from coyotes to Moose with it. The .270 is a great caliber.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

As stated above, the .270 will bring down anything around these parts. It's a great, flat-shooting round. I personally feel it's a little light for the really large stuff (moose, elk, bear), but it's awesome for deer and antelope. It will do the job on larger game, but your shot placement becomes more critical.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

Anything in the continental U.S. However, I consider it too heavy for varmint hunting small animals like prairie dogs and wood chucks. It will certainly kill them but it has too much recoil to make it enjoyable. .270 caliber bullets just aren't light enough. To hit that end of the spectrum, you have to take the .270 down a notch to the .25-06 but with that you give up the top end of the U.S. hunting spectrum.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

I've killed everything from coyotes to elk with mine. It is an excellent caliber, too often under rated.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from A Wild Beast at... wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Bruised Sausage presents it in a nice way. The 270 Winchester can be used for just about any game in North America.

Please, read my blog at http://awildbeastatheart.blogspot.com

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

I agree, assuming you choose (or handload) the right bullet and place it properly, I consider the versatile .270 Win appropriate for any game on the North American continent with the exception of brown bear. As a deer and antelope cartridge, you'd be hard-pressed to improve upon it. The .270 is "overkill" for varmint, but it'll perform well on small game with the right bullet. Are you considering the purchase of a rifle chambered for the .270 Win?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from scratchgolf72 wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

damn near everything, its a great flat shooting rifle that has multiple applications in the big game woods. anything from antelope to elk and black bear.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ALJoe wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

No need to add my two cents, ya'll pretty much said it all. I have successfully shot everything from bobcats to elk. It is a very very good all around caliber. I do most all of my deer hunting with the .270.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 17 weeks 1 day ago

GetOutThere,
Although I prefer other cartridges to the .270 myself, I certainly would not compare the .270 to a .22 Mag. A 150g Barnes TTSX will still be traveling at about 2400 fps with 1800 foot pounds of energy at 300 yards. That bullet has excellent penetration and a deer or even elk is carrying nothing to defend against a projectile with that terminal performance. Have you ever seen one of these bullets hit anything? The only limitation on the .270 in the lower 48 is its effective range. If your shots are inside 300 yards, you will be fine for anything we've got. With all cartridges you have to hit them in a vital area or you will have a mess. Come to think of it, I have seen more 30-06 and .300 Winny messes than .270 messes... mainly because more people have them I guess.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 15 weeks 4 days ago

I shot my first whitetail with a .270 in 1976. Had to have one of my own after that. Moved to Oregon in '77 and bought a used Rem. 760 Gamemaster, .270 for myself for my birthday and have never regretted it one bit. Most flat shooting rifle I ever shot, have had the honor of filling many blacktail tags as well as 7 Roosevelt bull elk tags. Has always been spot on!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

The range of a 270 on Game 400-1,000 Yards
Check out "History of the 270W" on line.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 4 days ago

Not a fan.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from GetOutThere wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

I agree you can take any animal in North America with good shot placement, but you can also do that with a .22 Mag. I believe this caliber is suited for thinner skinned animal, from Deer on down. You just don't have the penetration at longer ranges if you were to miis your shot and hit bone. This is a good caliber for closer shots on big game though. It is also a good starter caliber for any one as it has less recoil than say a .30 caliber.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer