Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
308 vs. 270 what are your opinions for elk

Question by squirrels worst.... Uploaded on May 14, 2013

Answers (12)

Top Rated
All Answers
from FirstBubba wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

Yes to either one. The .308 will shoot heavier bullets than the .270, but the 150 and 160 grain .277 bullets available to handloaders almost negates any advantage the .308 may hold.
Either one requires good bullet placement and respectable ranges

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.30-'06.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Safado wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.308 because of the heavier bullets and I own both!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JPMNTMAN wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

both are good but I like the 308 165 grain nosler partition or accubonds sure puts a hurt on them

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Pmacc60 wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

I also think both will do,270 win will shoot flatter and 150 gr. nos partition will give plenty of penetration and the 308 will handle heavier bullets.If I had to choose I would go with the 270.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ga hunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.308. I don't hunt elk, but a 165 grain Hornady GMX bullet would be probably be great! Or if you reload you could try some different loads. Good hunting!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

If you are holding your shots under 300 yards, either is fine. Past that, neither. For hunting in timber, the .308 Win is just fine.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

Ditto~~FirstBubba
Bullet Placement is Paramount to under 300Yd, JMO~The 308 Win gets my Vote.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Proverbs wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

With quality bonded bullets of at least 150gr, it doesn't matter between those two.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from small game sportsman wrote 4 weeks 2 days ago

I would go .308

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 3 weeks 4 days ago

I don't think you could go wrong with either one. I've been hunting with a .270 Remington,760 gamemaster since 1976 and absolutely love what it's done for me. I hunt only now for Roosevelt elk, all my kills have been inside 100 yds. and the rifle has never let me down. Winchester makes some excellent bonded loads, last 2 bulls dropped like they wer pole axed. Keep in mind though, like any rifle you choose, it takes good shot placement. Again, I believe either one will do well for you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from therifleman wrote 2 weeks 5 days ago

I usually hunt elk with a 308, but either will get the job done. That said, with elk, shot placement is far more important than your caliber. A poorly placed shot from a 45-70 will have you tracking for miles, whereas a good shot from a .243 (not recommended) will drop an elk in its tracks.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from FirstBubba wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

Yes to either one. The .308 will shoot heavier bullets than the .270, but the 150 and 160 grain .277 bullets available to handloaders almost negates any advantage the .308 may hold.
Either one requires good bullet placement and respectable ranges

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Proverbs wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

With quality bonded bullets of at least 150gr, it doesn't matter between those two.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Safado wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.308 because of the heavier bullets and I own both!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JPMNTMAN wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

both are good but I like the 308 165 grain nosler partition or accubonds sure puts a hurt on them

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Pmacc60 wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

I also think both will do,270 win will shoot flatter and 150 gr. nos partition will give plenty of penetration and the 308 will handle heavier bullets.If I had to choose I would go with the 270.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ga hunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.308. I don't hunt elk, but a 165 grain Hornady GMX bullet would be probably be great! Or if you reload you could try some different loads. Good hunting!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

Ditto~~FirstBubba
Bullet Placement is Paramount to under 300Yd, JMO~The 308 Win gets my Vote.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

.30-'06.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

If you are holding your shots under 300 yards, either is fine. Past that, neither. For hunting in timber, the .308 Win is just fine.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from small game sportsman wrote 4 weeks 2 days ago

I would go .308

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 3 weeks 4 days ago

I don't think you could go wrong with either one. I've been hunting with a .270 Remington,760 gamemaster since 1976 and absolutely love what it's done for me. I hunt only now for Roosevelt elk, all my kills have been inside 100 yds. and the rifle has never let me down. Winchester makes some excellent bonded loads, last 2 bulls dropped like they wer pole axed. Keep in mind though, like any rifle you choose, it takes good shot placement. Again, I believe either one will do well for you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from therifleman wrote 2 weeks 5 days ago

I usually hunt elk with a 308, but either will get the job done. That said, with elk, shot placement is far more important than your caliber. A poorly placed shot from a 45-70 will have you tracking for miles, whereas a good shot from a .243 (not recommended) will drop an elk in its tracks.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer