I have literally killed tons of them with a hand load using 165 grain Remington Coerlokts. The load duplicates the factory load. I've also rendered many inert with 150 grain Barnes X bullets including a boar that tipped the scales at over 500 lbs. I put four of the X's through his shoulders and ribs at 50 yards, all passed through. The first round would have killed him but on a hog that size if he is standing you had better be shooting.
I'm working on some '06 loads now using the the Barnes 168 grain TSX Boattail. It looks good so far and the velocity is surprising. Have not pork tested it yet but the time is near. That slug might just end up as my new all around '06 load.
Let me add something. A shot in the lungs will kill almost any hog in place. Smaller hogs are not hard to kill at all but can have lots of mud stuck to them making penetration difficult at times as lighter bullets open up too much on the hide.
As I said I've killed lots of feral hogs of all sizes and I've learned to discount light for caliber bullets. Even with a Barnes X I'd start with the 150's. Larger hogs are heavily boned and often come with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in. The shields (gristle plates) on the shoulder absorb "soft", lite bullets. You also never know when you will end up with a sizable old boar in your sights. At that moment I don't want a sub weight bullet up the spout. I've also found that hogs typically are not dazzled by velocity. Ruark's famous quote stands true here except in this case use enough bullet!
tennessee,
This is again where you're advocating using a .22 on something you shouldn't. Keep this in mind when you are giving advice:
Somebody else (not knowing) out there might take your bad advice - and run up on a hog like what Bee was talking about - and then be s#!t out of luck when they go to shooting it with what you are suggesting. You might be able to pull it off. I highly doubt it. Some of the ones in the Ocmulgee swamp I've seen take multiple rounds of much bigger stuff. Sure a .17HMR in the ear'd do it. Now get in the thicket where you are knee deep in mud and he's charging at you and put that shot there. KMA.
i didnt say go out in the woods with a 22 mag and start shooting at hogs with it. ive killed a few hogs with a 22 mag because i shot em through the head they was 100+ pound hogs and they was 60 or 70 yards away most of em didnt even know what hit em
"150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag"
"why would you want to hunt whitetail deer with a 7mm or a 300. a 22-250, 270, 30-30, or a 30-06 would kill a deer without the recoil. you could kill a deer with a 22 or 22 mag if it was leagal"
"does anybody think setting a shunk on fire in a live trap will keep it from spaying ive tried shooting them in the head but it dont work anybody got any ideas"
For the record, again, these are quotes of yours, here, on this answers board.
The 06 is good with the 200gr or 220gr r/n most of the old boys here use shotgun slugs(head shots)
CANT EAT THE HEAD! and TDHunter how meny run off
with a 22in there hide "you are under gun"
I have seen 400+Lb borhogs take 4 slugs in the head
and run 25 yards. safe hunting C~FL
I've had good success with the Winchester 150 grain Ballistic Silvertip. You have to pick your shots with the big ones, however. The ones with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in.
What the fellows are trying to delicately and not so delicately tell you is that you often don't think out your response before you engage the key board. No doub't you have it in your head but it doesn't make it to the key board.
I have killed pigs up to 70-80 lbs with a .22 LR with a shot in the soft spot at base of the ear. I was squirrel hunting each time and I waited and carefully set up the shot. We don't always have that opportunity in field when opportunities may not allow such placement.
In this case the person asked for info on loads for the the 30/06 and hogs. Trying to one up the person with the .22 mag story didn't provide the information they needed and might lead others with less experience than you to conclude that the .22 Mag is a giant killer in its own right. They very well could get hurt.
When someone asks for advice we need to make sure the advice we give them is sound and that there is some margin of reserve or error in the case of shooting something as unpredictable as a hog.
A local fellow who had the utmost confidence in his .243, his rifle of choice for almost 30 years. He was walking to his deer stand last season and encountered a very large boar. He made a what he thought was a good shot on the boar which ran into a thicket. He immediately went into the thicket confident that his giant killer had done the job with it's 90 grain slug. The pissed off boar with a grapefruit sized crater in its side tore him a new rear entry and several more entries as well.
He told me he would never ever shoot a hog with a .243 again. I would call that experience talking!
I like 165 Hornady Interlock bullets. Been around along time -still work great. Killed lots of critters with these bullets before they told me I had to have the fancy X bullets, partitions, balistic tips, TSX's, or TTSX's to kill anything. Nobody told those critters not to die.
Jeff4066
Your 150 grain Hornady Interlocks will work just great whether you are close or farther away. I have used the 150 grain interlocks and they work, my 300 WSM and .308 just seem to shoot 165 grain bullets better. They probably don't kill any better I just get better groups with them.
When I was doing hog depredation work on crop fields I used the 165 grain Remington Corelokts because they were and still are a good bullet. For that period of time (1980's and early 90's) they were one of the best out there that did not cost and arm and a leg. I could buy 500 of them at the time very reasonably and I loaded them to equal the factory loads. It was not unusual for my partner and I to kill 8-12 hogs per stand. With the 165's we killed hogs from 10 to 400 pounds. Most of the hogs were 200 or less and a pass through was normal. Even on 300 plus pounder the 165 at ranges of 50 to 150 yards would pass through broad side at a MV of 2750. I also loaded and shot some 180 Corelokts at the time and could tell no difference in them as far as penetration and lethal effect. On the bigger boys we tried to ear hole them if possible. The 165 could be angled up into the lungs behind the shield and I've seen the slug exit at the base of the neck with that shot.
We also shot or should I say sniped hogs with .223's, 243's and 25/06's. Those were carefully placed shots and they did kill. But... we found that small, slight and fast bullets tended to open up too quickly on tough muddy hide and pork fat. If I were to use one of these on larger porkers I'd opt for a Barnes X and still place my shots very carefully...
For 99% of your swine hunting a good 165 or 180 grain bullet from the old naught six will do anything you want.
Bee,
Awesome answer. What you're saying jives perfectly with what my Granddaddy used to tell me. His hog harvesting implement of choice was his 8mm Mauser.
BTW, been working on turned-down handloads for the .375 Ruger. Have a 200g Sierra flatnose @ 2300. I think it will be a hog busting machine. Am also working on some with 235 Barnes tsx's as we speak....
Me, personally...the Texas hog-killing Rem 165's for my aught-six in Corelokt or another old school choice, the Interlock 165.
Those Texas boar are as thick-skinned as a good NCAA basketball referee! You'd better be well-gunned and well-grained when surprised in the Southwest thicket by The Big Porker.
Yes, Chester would be proud and not preturbed that we modified his thoughts on this particular hunt!
Oh and Treestand...you crack me up dude, with the head shot comment!
What the fellows are trying to delicately and not so delicately tell you is that you often don't think out your response before you engage the key board. No doub't you have it in your head but it doesn't make it to the key board.
I have killed pigs up to 70-80 lbs with a .22 LR with a shot in the soft spot at base of the ear. I was squirrel hunting each time and I waited and carefully set up the shot. We don't always have that opportunity in field when opportunities may not allow such placement.
In this case the person asked for info on loads for the the 30/06 and hogs. Trying to one up the person with the .22 mag story didn't provide the information they needed and might lead others with less experience than you to conclude that the .22 Mag is a giant killer in its own right. They very well could get hurt.
When someone asks for advice we need to make sure the advice we give them is sound and that there is some margin of reserve or error in the case of shooting something as unpredictable as a hog.
A local fellow who had the utmost confidence in his .243, his rifle of choice for almost 30 years. He was walking to his deer stand last season and encountered a very large boar. He made a what he thought was a good shot on the boar which ran into a thicket. He immediately went into the thicket confident that his giant killer had done the job with it's 90 grain slug. The pissed off boar with a grapefruit sized crater in its side tore him a new rear entry and several more entries as well.
He told me he would never ever shoot a hog with a .243 again. I would call that experience talking!
"150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag"
"why would you want to hunt whitetail deer with a 7mm or a 300. a 22-250, 270, 30-30, or a 30-06 would kill a deer without the recoil. you could kill a deer with a 22 or 22 mag if it was leagal"
"does anybody think setting a shunk on fire in a live trap will keep it from spaying ive tried shooting them in the head but it dont work anybody got any ideas"
For the record, again, these are quotes of yours, here, on this answers board.
Let me add something. A shot in the lungs will kill almost any hog in place. Smaller hogs are not hard to kill at all but can have lots of mud stuck to them making penetration difficult at times as lighter bullets open up too much on the hide.
As I said I've killed lots of feral hogs of all sizes and I've learned to discount light for caliber bullets. Even with a Barnes X I'd start with the 150's. Larger hogs are heavily boned and often come with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in. The shields (gristle plates) on the shoulder absorb "soft", lite bullets. You also never know when you will end up with a sizable old boar in your sights. At that moment I don't want a sub weight bullet up the spout. I've also found that hogs typically are not dazzled by velocity. Ruark's famous quote stands true here except in this case use enough bullet!
tennessee,
This is again where you're advocating using a .22 on something you shouldn't. Keep this in mind when you are giving advice:
Somebody else (not knowing) out there might take your bad advice - and run up on a hog like what Bee was talking about - and then be s#!t out of luck when they go to shooting it with what you are suggesting. You might be able to pull it off. I highly doubt it. Some of the ones in the Ocmulgee swamp I've seen take multiple rounds of much bigger stuff. Sure a .17HMR in the ear'd do it. Now get in the thicket where you are knee deep in mud and he's charging at you and put that shot there. KMA.
The 06 is good with the 200gr or 220gr r/n most of the old boys here use shotgun slugs(head shots)
CANT EAT THE HEAD! and TDHunter how meny run off
with a 22in there hide "you are under gun"
I have seen 400+Lb borhogs take 4 slugs in the head
and run 25 yards. safe hunting C~FL
I have literally killed tons of them with a hand load using 165 grain Remington Coerlokts. The load duplicates the factory load. I've also rendered many inert with 150 grain Barnes X bullets including a boar that tipped the scales at over 500 lbs. I put four of the X's through his shoulders and ribs at 50 yards, all passed through. The first round would have killed him but on a hog that size if he is standing you had better be shooting.
I'm working on some '06 loads now using the the Barnes 168 grain TSX Boattail. It looks good so far and the velocity is surprising. Have not pork tested it yet but the time is near. That slug might just end up as my new all around '06 load.
I've had good success with the Winchester 150 grain Ballistic Silvertip. You have to pick your shots with the big ones, however. The ones with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in.
I like 165 Hornady Interlock bullets. Been around along time -still work great. Killed lots of critters with these bullets before they told me I had to have the fancy X bullets, partitions, balistic tips, TSX's, or TTSX's to kill anything. Nobody told those critters not to die.
Jeff4066
Your 150 grain Hornady Interlocks will work just great whether you are close or farther away. I have used the 150 grain interlocks and they work, my 300 WSM and .308 just seem to shoot 165 grain bullets better. They probably don't kill any better I just get better groups with them.
When I was doing hog depredation work on crop fields I used the 165 grain Remington Corelokts because they were and still are a good bullet. For that period of time (1980's and early 90's) they were one of the best out there that did not cost and arm and a leg. I could buy 500 of them at the time very reasonably and I loaded them to equal the factory loads. It was not unusual for my partner and I to kill 8-12 hogs per stand. With the 165's we killed hogs from 10 to 400 pounds. Most of the hogs were 200 or less and a pass through was normal. Even on 300 plus pounder the 165 at ranges of 50 to 150 yards would pass through broad side at a MV of 2750. I also loaded and shot some 180 Corelokts at the time and could tell no difference in them as far as penetration and lethal effect. On the bigger boys we tried to ear hole them if possible. The 165 could be angled up into the lungs behind the shield and I've seen the slug exit at the base of the neck with that shot.
We also shot or should I say sniped hogs with .223's, 243's and 25/06's. Those were carefully placed shots and they did kill. But... we found that small, slight and fast bullets tended to open up too quickly on tough muddy hide and pork fat. If I were to use one of these on larger porkers I'd opt for a Barnes X and still place my shots very carefully...
For 99% of your swine hunting a good 165 or 180 grain bullet from the old naught six will do anything you want.
Me, personally...the Texas hog-killing Rem 165's for my aught-six in Corelokt or another old school choice, the Interlock 165.
Those Texas boar are as thick-skinned as a good NCAA basketball referee! You'd better be well-gunned and well-grained when surprised in the Southwest thicket by The Big Porker.
Yes, Chester would be proud and not preturbed that we modified his thoughts on this particular hunt!
Oh and Treestand...you crack me up dude, with the head shot comment!
i didnt say go out in the woods with a 22 mag and start shooting at hogs with it. ive killed a few hogs with a 22 mag because i shot em through the head they was 100+ pound hogs and they was 60 or 70 yards away most of em didnt even know what hit em
Bee,
Awesome answer. What you're saying jives perfectly with what my Granddaddy used to tell me. His hog harvesting implement of choice was his 8mm Mauser.
BTW, been working on turned-down handloads for the .375 Ruger. Have a 200g Sierra flatnose @ 2300. I think it will be a hog busting machine. Am also working on some with 235 Barnes tsx's as we speak....
Answers (25)
150-165, I used 130's and they worked great!
I blew a hole about the size of your fist in a deer from 130 yds with a 125 grain 30-06
I have literally killed tons of them with a hand load using 165 grain Remington Coerlokts. The load duplicates the factory load. I've also rendered many inert with 150 grain Barnes X bullets including a boar that tipped the scales at over 500 lbs. I put four of the X's through his shoulders and ribs at 50 yards, all passed through. The first round would have killed him but on a hog that size if he is standing you had better be shooting.
I'm working on some '06 loads now using the the Barnes 168 grain TSX Boattail. It looks good so far and the velocity is surprising. Have not pork tested it yet but the time is near. That slug might just end up as my new all around '06 load.
I would go with any Barnes TSX or TTSX in the weights Bee mentioned. They are excellent bullets.
Let me add something. A shot in the lungs will kill almost any hog in place. Smaller hogs are not hard to kill at all but can have lots of mud stuck to them making penetration difficult at times as lighter bullets open up too much on the hide.
As I said I've killed lots of feral hogs of all sizes and I've learned to discount light for caliber bullets. Even with a Barnes X I'd start with the 150's. Larger hogs are heavily boned and often come with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in. The shields (gristle plates) on the shoulder absorb "soft", lite bullets. You also never know when you will end up with a sizable old boar in your sights. At that moment I don't want a sub weight bullet up the spout. I've also found that hogs typically are not dazzled by velocity. Ruark's famous quote stands true here except in this case use enough bullet!
150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag
tennessee,
This is again where you're advocating using a .22 on something you shouldn't. Keep this in mind when you are giving advice:
Somebody else (not knowing) out there might take your bad advice - and run up on a hog like what Bee was talking about - and then be s#!t out of luck when they go to shooting it with what you are suggesting. You might be able to pull it off. I highly doubt it. Some of the ones in the Ocmulgee swamp I've seen take multiple rounds of much bigger stuff. Sure a .17HMR in the ear'd do it. Now get in the thicket where you are knee deep in mud and he's charging at you and put that shot there. KMA.
150-165 grain Nosler Partition, Barnes TSX (or TTSX)
Another "ready, shoot, aim" by our resident Volunteer State deer expert.....
DARN woodsmanj35, JUST NUKE THE SUCKER WILL'YA! LOL!
Not going to have much rib meat remaining!
that's skunk expert, WAM......
i didnt say go out in the woods with a 22 mag and start shooting at hogs with it. ive killed a few hogs with a 22 mag because i shot em through the head they was 100+ pound hogs and they was 60 or 70 yards away most of em didnt even know what hit em
Your quotes:
"150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag"
"why would you want to hunt whitetail deer with a 7mm or a 300. a 22-250, 270, 30-30, or a 30-06 would kill a deer without the recoil. you could kill a deer with a 22 or 22 mag if it was leagal"
"does anybody think setting a shunk on fire in a live trap will keep it from spaying ive tried shooting them in the head but it dont work anybody got any ideas"
For the record, again, these are quotes of yours, here, on this answers board.
The 06 is good with the 200gr or 220gr r/n most of the old boys here use shotgun slugs(head shots)
CANT EAT THE HEAD! and TDHunter how meny run off
with a 22in there hide "you are under gun"
I have seen 400+Lb borhogs take 4 slugs in the head
and run 25 yards. safe hunting C~FL
I've had good success with the Winchester 150 grain Ballistic Silvertip. You have to pick your shots with the big ones, however. The ones with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in.
Tenessee,
What the fellows are trying to delicately and not so delicately tell you is that you often don't think out your response before you engage the key board. No doub't you have it in your head but it doesn't make it to the key board.
I have killed pigs up to 70-80 lbs with a .22 LR with a shot in the soft spot at base of the ear. I was squirrel hunting each time and I waited and carefully set up the shot. We don't always have that opportunity in field when opportunities may not allow such placement.
In this case the person asked for info on loads for the the 30/06 and hogs. Trying to one up the person with the .22 mag story didn't provide the information they needed and might lead others with less experience than you to conclude that the .22 Mag is a giant killer in its own right. They very well could get hurt.
When someone asks for advice we need to make sure the advice we give them is sound and that there is some margin of reserve or error in the case of shooting something as unpredictable as a hog.
A local fellow who had the utmost confidence in his .243, his rifle of choice for almost 30 years. He was walking to his deer stand last season and encountered a very large boar. He made a what he thought was a good shot on the boar which ran into a thicket. He immediately went into the thicket confident that his giant killer had done the job with it's 90 grain slug. The pissed off boar with a grapefruit sized crater in its side tore him a new rear entry and several more entries as well.
He told me he would never ever shoot a hog with a .243 again. I would call that experience talking!
You going stand dar or you going to shoot with what you got!
I like 165 Hornady Interlock bullets. Been around along time -still work great. Killed lots of critters with these bullets before they told me I had to have the fancy X bullets, partitions, balistic tips, TSX's, or TTSX's to kill anything. Nobody told those critters not to die.
Clay, I would, but it's not legal.... now that I come to think of it, a 460 Weatherby loaded with 500 grain fmj might come pretty close though....
I've only reloaded the 150 grain Hornady Interlocks, but I would like to ask this in relation to the asked question...
With the high power of a .30-06, do you want the heavier round, since it will probably be closer than most game?
I throw this in because of Sarge01's quote.
Jeff4066
Your 150 grain Hornady Interlocks will work just great whether you are close or farther away. I have used the 150 grain interlocks and they work, my 300 WSM and .308 just seem to shoot 165 grain bullets better. They probably don't kill any better I just get better groups with them.
Jeff,
When I was doing hog depredation work on crop fields I used the 165 grain Remington Corelokts because they were and still are a good bullet. For that period of time (1980's and early 90's) they were one of the best out there that did not cost and arm and a leg. I could buy 500 of them at the time very reasonably and I loaded them to equal the factory loads. It was not unusual for my partner and I to kill 8-12 hogs per stand. With the 165's we killed hogs from 10 to 400 pounds. Most of the hogs were 200 or less and a pass through was normal. Even on 300 plus pounder the 165 at ranges of 50 to 150 yards would pass through broad side at a MV of 2750. I also loaded and shot some 180 Corelokts at the time and could tell no difference in them as far as penetration and lethal effect. On the bigger boys we tried to ear hole them if possible. The 165 could be angled up into the lungs behind the shield and I've seen the slug exit at the base of the neck with that shot.
We also shot or should I say sniped hogs with .223's, 243's and 25/06's. Those were carefully placed shots and they did kill. But... we found that small, slight and fast bullets tended to open up too quickly on tough muddy hide and pork fat. If I were to use one of these on larger porkers I'd opt for a Barnes X and still place my shots very carefully...
For 99% of your swine hunting a good 165 or 180 grain bullet from the old naught six will do anything you want.
Bee,
Awesome answer. What you're saying jives perfectly with what my Granddaddy used to tell me. His hog harvesting implement of choice was his 8mm Mauser.
BTW, been working on turned-down handloads for the .375 Ruger. Have a 200g Sierra flatnose @ 2300. I think it will be a hog busting machine. Am also working on some with 235 Barnes tsx's as we speak....
S Ga
Me, personally...the Texas hog-killing Rem 165's for my aught-six in Corelokt or another old school choice, the Interlock 165.
Those Texas boar are as thick-skinned as a good NCAA basketball referee! You'd better be well-gunned and well-grained when surprised in the Southwest thicket by The Big Porker.
Yes, Chester would be proud and not preturbed that we modified his thoughts on this particular hunt!
Oh and Treestand...you crack me up dude, with the head shot comment!
i used 150, 165 and 180 gr soft tip. less expensive bullet which ever one is on sale. i always aim for the head.
you can use 150, 180 barnes or partitions, a more expensive bullet only if you like body shots or a little bigger target.
Post an Answer
Tenessee,
What the fellows are trying to delicately and not so delicately tell you is that you often don't think out your response before you engage the key board. No doub't you have it in your head but it doesn't make it to the key board.
I have killed pigs up to 70-80 lbs with a .22 LR with a shot in the soft spot at base of the ear. I was squirrel hunting each time and I waited and carefully set up the shot. We don't always have that opportunity in field when opportunities may not allow such placement.
In this case the person asked for info on loads for the the 30/06 and hogs. Trying to one up the person with the .22 mag story didn't provide the information they needed and might lead others with less experience than you to conclude that the .22 Mag is a giant killer in its own right. They very well could get hurt.
When someone asks for advice we need to make sure the advice we give them is sound and that there is some margin of reserve or error in the case of shooting something as unpredictable as a hog.
A local fellow who had the utmost confidence in his .243, his rifle of choice for almost 30 years. He was walking to his deer stand last season and encountered a very large boar. He made a what he thought was a good shot on the boar which ran into a thicket. He immediately went into the thicket confident that his giant killer had done the job with it's 90 grain slug. The pissed off boar with a grapefruit sized crater in its side tore him a new rear entry and several more entries as well.
He told me he would never ever shoot a hog with a .243 again. I would call that experience talking!
Your quotes:
"150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag"
"why would you want to hunt whitetail deer with a 7mm or a 300. a 22-250, 270, 30-30, or a 30-06 would kill a deer without the recoil. you could kill a deer with a 22 or 22 mag if it was leagal"
"does anybody think setting a shunk on fire in a live trap will keep it from spaying ive tried shooting them in the head but it dont work anybody got any ideas"
For the record, again, these are quotes of yours, here, on this answers board.
Let me add something. A shot in the lungs will kill almost any hog in place. Smaller hogs are not hard to kill at all but can have lots of mud stuck to them making penetration difficult at times as lighter bullets open up too much on the hide.
As I said I've killed lots of feral hogs of all sizes and I've learned to discount light for caliber bullets. Even with a Barnes X I'd start with the 150's. Larger hogs are heavily boned and often come with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in. The shields (gristle plates) on the shoulder absorb "soft", lite bullets. You also never know when you will end up with a sizable old boar in your sights. At that moment I don't want a sub weight bullet up the spout. I've also found that hogs typically are not dazzled by velocity. Ruark's famous quote stands true here except in this case use enough bullet!
tennessee,
This is again where you're advocating using a .22 on something you shouldn't. Keep this in mind when you are giving advice:
Somebody else (not knowing) out there might take your bad advice - and run up on a hog like what Bee was talking about - and then be s#!t out of luck when they go to shooting it with what you are suggesting. You might be able to pull it off. I highly doubt it. Some of the ones in the Ocmulgee swamp I've seen take multiple rounds of much bigger stuff. Sure a .17HMR in the ear'd do it. Now get in the thicket where you are knee deep in mud and he's charging at you and put that shot there. KMA.
150-165 grain Nosler Partition, Barnes TSX (or TTSX)
The 06 is good with the 200gr or 220gr r/n most of the old boys here use shotgun slugs(head shots)
CANT EAT THE HEAD! and TDHunter how meny run off
with a 22in there hide "you are under gun"
I have seen 400+Lb borhogs take 4 slugs in the head
and run 25 yards. safe hunting C~FL
I have literally killed tons of them with a hand load using 165 grain Remington Coerlokts. The load duplicates the factory load. I've also rendered many inert with 150 grain Barnes X bullets including a boar that tipped the scales at over 500 lbs. I put four of the X's through his shoulders and ribs at 50 yards, all passed through. The first round would have killed him but on a hog that size if he is standing you had better be shooting.
I'm working on some '06 loads now using the the Barnes 168 grain TSX Boattail. It looks good so far and the velocity is surprising. Have not pork tested it yet but the time is near. That slug might just end up as my new all around '06 load.
I would go with any Barnes TSX or TTSX in the weights Bee mentioned. They are excellent bullets.
Another "ready, shoot, aim" by our resident Volunteer State deer expert.....
that's skunk expert, WAM......
I've had good success with the Winchester 150 grain Ballistic Silvertip. You have to pick your shots with the big ones, however. The ones with enough mud to plant a crop of corn in.
I blew a hole about the size of your fist in a deer from 130 yds with a 125 grain 30-06
I like 165 Hornady Interlock bullets. Been around along time -still work great. Killed lots of critters with these bullets before they told me I had to have the fancy X bullets, partitions, balistic tips, TSX's, or TTSX's to kill anything. Nobody told those critters not to die.
Clay, I would, but it's not legal.... now that I come to think of it, a 460 Weatherby loaded with 500 grain fmj might come pretty close though....
I've only reloaded the 150 grain Hornady Interlocks, but I would like to ask this in relation to the asked question...
With the high power of a .30-06, do you want the heavier round, since it will probably be closer than most game?
I throw this in because of Sarge01's quote.
Jeff4066
Your 150 grain Hornady Interlocks will work just great whether you are close or farther away. I have used the 150 grain interlocks and they work, my 300 WSM and .308 just seem to shoot 165 grain bullets better. They probably don't kill any better I just get better groups with them.
Jeff,
When I was doing hog depredation work on crop fields I used the 165 grain Remington Corelokts because they were and still are a good bullet. For that period of time (1980's and early 90's) they were one of the best out there that did not cost and arm and a leg. I could buy 500 of them at the time very reasonably and I loaded them to equal the factory loads. It was not unusual for my partner and I to kill 8-12 hogs per stand. With the 165's we killed hogs from 10 to 400 pounds. Most of the hogs were 200 or less and a pass through was normal. Even on 300 plus pounder the 165 at ranges of 50 to 150 yards would pass through broad side at a MV of 2750. I also loaded and shot some 180 Corelokts at the time and could tell no difference in them as far as penetration and lethal effect. On the bigger boys we tried to ear hole them if possible. The 165 could be angled up into the lungs behind the shield and I've seen the slug exit at the base of the neck with that shot.
We also shot or should I say sniped hogs with .223's, 243's and 25/06's. Those were carefully placed shots and they did kill. But... we found that small, slight and fast bullets tended to open up too quickly on tough muddy hide and pork fat. If I were to use one of these on larger porkers I'd opt for a Barnes X and still place my shots very carefully...
For 99% of your swine hunting a good 165 or 180 grain bullet from the old naught six will do anything you want.
Me, personally...the Texas hog-killing Rem 165's for my aught-six in Corelokt or another old school choice, the Interlock 165.
Those Texas boar are as thick-skinned as a good NCAA basketball referee! You'd better be well-gunned and well-grained when surprised in the Southwest thicket by The Big Porker.
Yes, Chester would be proud and not preturbed that we modified his thoughts on this particular hunt!
Oh and Treestand...you crack me up dude, with the head shot comment!
i used 150, 165 and 180 gr soft tip. less expensive bullet which ever one is on sale. i always aim for the head.
you can use 150, 180 barnes or partitions, a more expensive bullet only if you like body shots or a little bigger target.
150-165, I used 130's and they worked great!
DARN woodsmanj35, JUST NUKE THE SUCKER WILL'YA! LOL!
Not going to have much rib meat remaining!
i didnt say go out in the woods with a 22 mag and start shooting at hogs with it. ive killed a few hogs with a 22 mag because i shot em through the head they was 100+ pound hogs and they was 60 or 70 yards away most of em didnt even know what hit em
You going stand dar or you going to shoot with what you got!
Bee,
Awesome answer. What you're saying jives perfectly with what my Granddaddy used to tell me. His hog harvesting implement of choice was his 8mm Mauser.
BTW, been working on turned-down handloads for the .375 Ruger. Have a 200g Sierra flatnose @ 2300. I think it will be a hog busting machine. Am also working on some with 235 Barnes tsx's as we speak....
S Ga
150 would be alright but ive killed hogs with a 22 mag
Post an Answer