Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
what size shell do you use when it comes to waterfowl hunting 3 inch or 3.5?

Question by lefthandedshooter. Uploaded on April 30, 2011

Answers (18)

Top Rated
All Answers
from deerhunterrick wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

It depends on where I am shooting. River pass shooting I use 3" , fields I use 3.5" because I know they are gonna setup outside my decoys and the occassional goose is gonna make a visit. If I am puddle jumping or hunting flooded woods though I stick to the 2.75's becasue most of my shots are gonna be right on top of me. I generally change out my chokes as well. Full on the river ex-full in the field and modified full in the woods.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Don't hunt waterfowl anymore, but I don't shoot anything except 2.75 ammo. It accomplishes all my desired tasks. Turkey, dove, squirrel and the occasional pond jumped mallard.

Bubba

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

P.S. - the Mallard is always a drake. I'll eat the bird, but I'm actually after the "drake tails"! LOL!!

Bubba

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from AJMcClure wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I recommend everyone shoot 3.5 inches until they are more likely not to want to get up at 3am on a freezing cold morning because they didn't have much fun last time, their shoulders are sore, they ears are ringing, and the weather is not ideal, and leave some extra birds for me to pick off.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

P.P.S. - there is no reason for 3 and 3.5 inch ammo.

Bubba

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chase15 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

i would use a 3.5, it gets the job done.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ARhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3in. all ya need.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Dawgz is right I have killed plenty of Ducks , Pheasant & turkey with 2 3/4 & 3" no need for 3 1/2, it was a marketing ploy to sell bigger guns and shells. AND Make orthopedic surgeons richer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

DITTO~Moishe&Dawgz!!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Moishe has got it right. New cartridges are made to sell new guns. I expect we will be seeing 3 3/4 inch shells shortly.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Strange , isn't it how 2 3/4" shells worked for 100 years and now they are barely adaquite.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Waterfowling is the only time I see the 3.5 as reasonable. It helps make for good pattern density with large steel shot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from lefthandedshooter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

ed j the reason why i never mentioned it cause i have yet to fine a 2 3/4 steel shot for waterfowl .

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3" shells are more than adequate. I have some 3 1/2's in inventory and two shotguns that shoot them, but when that stock is gone, no more 3 1/2".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RES1956 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I have found 3" steel entirely adequate for the waterfowling I do. I thought with the advent of 3.5" shells there may have been merit in some of the lead offerings for turkey hunting, but found that 3" shells, as a rule, produced better patterns. An important key with steel is velocity, as Ontario Honker has alluded to in the past and I agree. Therefore I will opt for 1 1/8 oz loads that are faster than 1 1/4 oz steel. 2 3/4" worked well until the communist mandated the use of steel in the US. Steel requires a longer shot column and thus there is not enough room to drive any kind of shot charge with reasonable velocity at safe pressures.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt and fish wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Usually 2.75 in for duck occasionally 3 in for longer shots and almost always 3 in for goose. Also with 2.75, you can shoot all day without your should getting sore. I once went through 1.5 boxes of shells in one day of duck hunting and only killed 2 ducks lol.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JGooding1 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

For teal I use 2 3/4in steel dove loads because they work great and cost effective. For bigger ducks and geese I use 3in steel.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from AJMcClure wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I recommend everyone shoot 3.5 inches until they are more likely not to want to get up at 3am on a freezing cold morning because they didn't have much fun last time, their shoulders are sore, they ears are ringing, and the weather is not ideal, and leave some extra birds for me to pick off.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from deerhunterrick wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

It depends on where I am shooting. River pass shooting I use 3" , fields I use 3.5" because I know they are gonna setup outside my decoys and the occassional goose is gonna make a visit. If I am puddle jumping or hunting flooded woods though I stick to the 2.75's becasue most of my shots are gonna be right on top of me. I generally change out my chokes as well. Full on the river ex-full in the field and modified full in the woods.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Don't hunt waterfowl anymore, but I don't shoot anything except 2.75 ammo. It accomplishes all my desired tasks. Turkey, dove, squirrel and the occasional pond jumped mallard.

Bubba

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

P.P.S. - there is no reason for 3 and 3.5 inch ammo.

Bubba

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ARhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3in. all ya need.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Dawgz is right I have killed plenty of Ducks , Pheasant & turkey with 2 3/4 & 3" no need for 3 1/2, it was a marketing ploy to sell bigger guns and shells. AND Make orthopedic surgeons richer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Treestand wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

DITTO~Moishe&Dawgz!!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Strange , isn't it how 2 3/4" shells worked for 100 years and now they are barely adaquite.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JGooding1 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

For teal I use 2 3/4in steel dove loads because they work great and cost effective. For bigger ducks and geese I use 3in steel.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

P.S. - the Mallard is always a drake. I'll eat the bird, but I'm actually after the "drake tails"! LOL!!

Bubba

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from chase15 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

i would use a 3.5, it gets the job done.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Moishe has got it right. New cartridges are made to sell new guns. I expect we will be seeing 3 3/4 inch shells shortly.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Waterfowling is the only time I see the 3.5 as reasonable. It helps make for good pattern density with large steel shot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from lefthandedshooter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

ed j the reason why i never mentioned it cause i have yet to fine a 2 3/4 steel shot for waterfowl .

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

3" shells are more than adequate. I have some 3 1/2's in inventory and two shotguns that shoot them, but when that stock is gone, no more 3 1/2".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RES1956 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I have found 3" steel entirely adequate for the waterfowling I do. I thought with the advent of 3.5" shells there may have been merit in some of the lead offerings for turkey hunting, but found that 3" shells, as a rule, produced better patterns. An important key with steel is velocity, as Ontario Honker has alluded to in the past and I agree. Therefore I will opt for 1 1/8 oz loads that are faster than 1 1/4 oz steel. 2 3/4" worked well until the communist mandated the use of steel in the US. Steel requires a longer shot column and thus there is not enough room to drive any kind of shot charge with reasonable velocity at safe pressures.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt and fish wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Usually 2.75 in for duck occasionally 3 in for longer shots and almost always 3 in for goose. Also with 2.75, you can shoot all day without your should getting sore. I once went through 1.5 boxes of shells in one day of duck hunting and only killed 2 ducks lol.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer