Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
I see a lot of camouflage on guns these days. I even own one myself, but my question is, do you think camouflage helps in a hunting situation, is better than dull steel and wood, or is just the latest thing that looks good? Have at it!

Question by crm3006. Uploaded on March 20, 2010

Answers (24)

Top Rated
All Answers
from country road wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I have a fully camoed Mossberg 835 for turkey hunting, but I don't think there is a great deal of need for full camo on long guns. Mostly, you are going to be shooting at a distance where the game won't see the gun, and if you don't have a shiny finish on your gun, you should be fine. I think it's pretty much a gimmick. Having said that, in a close up situation like turkey hunting, there may be a small advantage in the camo, and I need all the advantage I can get, so I'll use it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't see a need for it, a dull finish and stock should bo good!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I dont have any guns camoed but my bow sure is, camo may not be any great advantage but I think it may boost to some hunters confidence and that might just help a bit.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Id take the dull finish.And have plenty left over for gas money.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Savage wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

i dont see where it can hurt . but with that being said only two of my guns are done up in it . the rest are blued steel and wood or synthetic stocks

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Well lets go back to the age old question for deer. Camo or blaze? Well, if you're in a stand, it doesn't matter. But we don't want to look like a noob wearing blaze. Same thing with camo guns. Nessecary? No. Awesome? Yes. And it feels awesome to blend in (or feel like you are) instead of sticking out like a carrot. And, if you look down at a camo gun, you feel a whole lot cooler.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Yes, all my guns for the woods this year are Realtree. I'd like to think that it matters that I get realtree instead of Mossy Oak Breakup. But all that does is blend it with my clothes so I feel stealthy.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

So what has cool got to do with hunting success? I will look like a noob all day and let you take pictures if it gets me a shot at what I'm after!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It doesn't matter as long as it's non-glare. All thats gonna set an animal off is something shining in the sun.So don't go out with some shiny skeet gun.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I think for turkey hunting it would be useful. Other than that, I think it's overkill. For rifle hunting, it's just plain silly. My old 870 is getting a bit shiny but I can still to very well with it. I'm aware of it and make sure its down and concealed as much as possible when I'm bringing in the honkers. For years I have wanted to do something about that dopey chrome plated shell feeder on the underside. That really was a stupid design element. Ocassionally I see some black ones advertised on Ebay. I'm always having to put my hand over that thing to keep it covered up. For waterfowl hunters who park their butts in blinds I can see no purpose in having camo shotguns. A shiny gun might even help. When that gun comes up I'd just as soon the birds flared. I often have to waste the first shot to get them flared if they're coming straight in to the deeks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Bambi, I tried to give you a plus for that nice piece of utilitarian philosophy but I hit the minus by mistake. So I evened it up to zip. Sorry.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Ive a freezer full of birds that didnt make the connection either or.And Id like to think, the last thing my turkey saw was my ugly yeller teeth behind my black as coal 1187. Both grinning to beat the band.Just a matter of personal preferance,and $$$$.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from deerstalker wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't think it does at all. I've never used a camo gun and have had plenty of success. A gun is a gun no matter the finish.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I think camo helps with turkey hunting but everything else is just overkill.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It depends on what you are hunting. If you are laying in a cut corn field trying to call in geese it helps a LOT. Geese and ducks can spot a shotgun in a flash if you are not completely concealed in a blind. In that situation camo not only helps; it is mandatory. I also feel a little better turkey hunting with camo because they get lots of time to look at you before getting close. However, I don't think it is as important there because they are usually looking right at the business end of my shotgun. I like the looks of a blued finish for all upland bird hunting and clays though so I just use camo tape when I need it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I never hunt in a blind and I do pretty good bringing home the honkers. And, as I said, my goose buster is getting shiney (see the vignette image of my older black lab - the gun is against the fence right behind her). Sunny days are a challenge but most important thing is to avoid positioning the gun in a reflective position. Usually if it's kept down and reasonably parallel to the ground it won't reflect the light as much as if it's held vertical. Also avoid movement as much as possible whether you're camoed up or not. And make any movement slow and fluid. Remember, the birds are flying and their perspective is constantly changing so everything they see is "moving." If you follow the above rule, it's much harder for you to be picked out than if you jerk your head around to see where they are.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from farmboy4240 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Its a nice asset to have but personally i've killed just as many birds with my wood stock guns than my buddies with camo stocks. Its up to you whether spending the extra 50 bucks is worth it or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It's a factor for turkeys and coyotes, and some waterfowl situations, but obviously people did just fine before we had camo anything.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

My Granddad must be laughing in his grave over the silliness going on in the hunting community now he wore a red plaid Pendleton shirt and Brown pants and jacket if he needed one, but this was Florida so rarely needed the jacket.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't own a camo gun, never felt a need for one. I don't even own a gun with a synthetic stock. To me a firearm is a work of art. Deep bluing and a hand checkered walnut stock is an art form suitable for a future family heirloom. My furniture is leather and quarter sawn oak. I wear wool instead of fleece. I drink real ale and single malt scotch. Maybe I'm like a fiddler on a roof, but I cling tenaciously to tradition. I do not get offended when called old fashioned. Perhaps the most sensible reason why I don't own a camo gun is that I would surely lose it in the woods if I were to lay it down.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Sourdough Dave-
Amen on the single malt. Probably the only thing the Scots got right.
My camouflage rifle came about because that is literally all that was available. I hope I don't ever lay it down in the woods. The other synthetics are nylon/rhynite/composite, but they are all shooters, and get carried a lot because they are what you would call "kickin' around guns", (not that anybody better kick them), a .410 Savage, Nylon 66 and my most faithful Old Ugly .30-'06.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Good comments Dave!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

A friend of mine bought a camo Browning Hi-Power. What an atrocity! I assume the previous owner had it dipped (who was the dip here?). I still have my Hi-Power that served me well and despite the several pits, scratches, and wear; it is still far more attractive than a camo one! I confess that my 870 Super Mag has a custom (mine) camo paint job for turkey and waterfowl hunting. All my other shotguns are blued steel and walnut stocked. I don't drink much these days but when I do it is good scotch, Tennessee Sour Mash, or a good IPA. No more Budwipers or Old Tennisshoe bourbon for this old boy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

What idiot would dip a Browning Hi-Power? Give that boy a blindfold and a cigarette. What a crime!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

So what has cool got to do with hunting success? I will look like a noob all day and let you take pictures if it gets me a shot at what I'm after!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't own a camo gun, never felt a need for one. I don't even own a gun with a synthetic stock. To me a firearm is a work of art. Deep bluing and a hand checkered walnut stock is an art form suitable for a future family heirloom. My furniture is leather and quarter sawn oak. I wear wool instead of fleece. I drink real ale and single malt scotch. Maybe I'm like a fiddler on a roof, but I cling tenaciously to tradition. I do not get offended when called old fashioned. Perhaps the most sensible reason why I don't own a camo gun is that I would surely lose it in the woods if I were to lay it down.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Sourdough Dave-
Amen on the single malt. Probably the only thing the Scots got right.
My camouflage rifle came about because that is literally all that was available. I hope I don't ever lay it down in the woods. The other synthetics are nylon/rhynite/composite, but they are all shooters, and get carried a lot because they are what you would call "kickin' around guns", (not that anybody better kick them), a .410 Savage, Nylon 66 and my most faithful Old Ugly .30-'06.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I have a fully camoed Mossberg 835 for turkey hunting, but I don't think there is a great deal of need for full camo on long guns. Mostly, you are going to be shooting at a distance where the game won't see the gun, and if you don't have a shiny finish on your gun, you should be fine. I think it's pretty much a gimmick. Having said that, in a close up situation like turkey hunting, there may be a small advantage in the camo, and I need all the advantage I can get, so I'll use it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Id take the dull finish.And have plenty left over for gas money.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Ive a freezer full of birds that didnt make the connection either or.And Id like to think, the last thing my turkey saw was my ugly yeller teeth behind my black as coal 1187. Both grinning to beat the band.Just a matter of personal preferance,and $$$$.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I dont have any guns camoed but my bow sure is, camo may not be any great advantage but I think it may boost to some hunters confidence and that might just help a bit.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I think for turkey hunting it would be useful. Other than that, I think it's overkill. For rifle hunting, it's just plain silly. My old 870 is getting a bit shiny but I can still to very well with it. I'm aware of it and make sure its down and concealed as much as possible when I'm bringing in the honkers. For years I have wanted to do something about that dopey chrome plated shell feeder on the underside. That really was a stupid design element. Ocassionally I see some black ones advertised on Ebay. I'm always having to put my hand over that thing to keep it covered up. For waterfowl hunters who park their butts in blinds I can see no purpose in having camo shotguns. A shiny gun might even help. When that gun comes up I'd just as soon the birds flared. I often have to waste the first shot to get them flared if they're coming straight in to the deeks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Bambi, I tried to give you a plus for that nice piece of utilitarian philosophy but I hit the minus by mistake. So I evened it up to zip. Sorry.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Well lets go back to the age old question for deer. Camo or blaze? Well, if you're in a stand, it doesn't matter. But we don't want to look like a noob wearing blaze. Same thing with camo guns. Nessecary? No. Awesome? Yes. And it feels awesome to blend in (or feel like you are) instead of sticking out like a carrot. And, if you look down at a camo gun, you feel a whole lot cooler.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Yes, all my guns for the woods this year are Realtree. I'd like to think that it matters that I get realtree instead of Mossy Oak Breakup. But all that does is blend it with my clothes so I feel stealthy.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ByeByeBambi wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It doesn't matter as long as it's non-glare. All thats gonna set an animal off is something shining in the sun.So don't go out with some shiny skeet gun.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I think camo helps with turkey hunting but everything else is just overkill.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It's a factor for turkeys and coyotes, and some waterfowl situations, but obviously people did just fine before we had camo anything.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

My Granddad must be laughing in his grave over the silliness going on in the hunting community now he wore a red plaid Pendleton shirt and Brown pants and jacket if he needed one, but this was Florida so rarely needed the jacket.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Good comments Dave!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from deerstalker wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't think it does at all. I've never used a camo gun and have had plenty of success. A gun is a gun no matter the finish.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

A friend of mine bought a camo Browning Hi-Power. What an atrocity! I assume the previous owner had it dipped (who was the dip here?). I still have my Hi-Power that served me well and despite the several pits, scratches, and wear; it is still far more attractive than a camo one! I confess that my 870 Super Mag has a custom (mine) camo paint job for turkey and waterfowl hunting. All my other shotguns are blued steel and walnut stocked. I don't drink much these days but when I do it is good scotch, Tennessee Sour Mash, or a good IPA. No more Budwipers or Old Tennisshoe bourbon for this old boy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I don't see a need for it, a dull finish and stock should bo good!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DakotaMan wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It depends on what you are hunting. If you are laying in a cut corn field trying to call in geese it helps a LOT. Geese and ducks can spot a shotgun in a flash if you are not completely concealed in a blind. In that situation camo not only helps; it is mandatory. I also feel a little better turkey hunting with camo because they get lots of time to look at you before getting close. However, I don't think it is as important there because they are usually looking right at the business end of my shotgun. I like the looks of a blued finish for all upland bird hunting and clays though so I just use camo tape when I need it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Savage wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

i dont see where it can hurt . but with that being said only two of my guns are done up in it . the rest are blued steel and wood or synthetic stocks

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from farmboy4240 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Its a nice asset to have but personally i've killed just as many birds with my wood stock guns than my buddies with camo stocks. Its up to you whether spending the extra 50 bucks is worth it or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I never hunt in a blind and I do pretty good bringing home the honkers. And, as I said, my goose buster is getting shiney (see the vignette image of my older black lab - the gun is against the fence right behind her). Sunny days are a challenge but most important thing is to avoid positioning the gun in a reflective position. Usually if it's kept down and reasonably parallel to the ground it won't reflect the light as much as if it's held vertical. Also avoid movement as much as possible whether you're camoed up or not. And make any movement slow and fluid. Remember, the birds are flying and their perspective is constantly changing so everything they see is "moving." If you follow the above rule, it's much harder for you to be picked out than if you jerk your head around to see where they are.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

What idiot would dip a Browning Hi-Power? Give that boy a blindfold and a cigarette. What a crime!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer