Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

AnswersASK YOUR QUESTION

Answers

Q:
For good mangment would you rather shoot does or bucks

Question by MHorak243. Uploaded on November 12, 2009

Answers (17)

Top Rated
All Answers
from jestr1 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Bucks. Something that is a decent size buck with a smaller rack. The better the gene pool is for breeding the better the offspring will be the next few years. Unless your overrun by does then take a few small ones too.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from BioGuy wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Depends on: age structure, sex ratios, genetics, and your managment goals and objectives.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

BUCKs, I never have, and never will shoot a dow!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from IanS wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I think if you are shooting an animal just to put meat in the freezer you should shoot a doe and not shoot a buck that could become a trophy if given a few more years to live.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

For good management, you should shoot a doe for every buck you take. Unless your herd already has a one to one buck to doe ratio, you should take more than one doe for every buck. It doesn't matter whether you WANT to shoot does, you should do it for proper herd balance.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tony167n wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I would shoot does and small bucks

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does, does and more does. We have way too many does in this part of Arkansas, no one wants to shoot one. Our poor bucks run themselves to death trying to stay ahead of the dogs and to breed the 10-20 doe he's required to breed. I think if Arkansas hunters were to thin the doe herd, the bucks would grow larger and older. States that have the one to one buck to doe ratio have better herds and better bucks from what I've seen. I grew up hunting Texas where we were allowed 2 does and one buck, some years the state even let us take 2 bucks, now look at the deer numbers in Texas, some of the best deer numbers per acre as any other states.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from anjadams wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

There is definitely nothing wrong with shooting does. I agree shooting them helps the herd! Let those young bucks live and take out some of those nannys!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jordjohn44 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Obviously the answer to this is does. One buck can get hundreds of doe pregnant. You are removing multiple deer from the woods for each doe you take and only removing one for each buck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does. Let the bucks grow to monsters.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Depends on the current status of the herd. If the does are carrying us away, then they need to be thinned a bit.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 86Ram wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does and select bucks. The mortality rate of bucks is higher than does from what I've read.
Wild Does I've seen have any where from 1 fawn to triplets.
Like others have said so far it depends also on the ratio within the herd.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from BioGuy wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Justin D just reminded me of another important variable to add to my previous answer...geographic location. In areas that experience harsh winters harvesting does can be VERY detrimental to the deer herd. The reason is because the winter kill is a more effective method of population control than hunting. In these areas, there are often "buck only" regulations. The Adirondacks in NY is a pretty good example.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from TheEasternShore... wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

does you have to shoot them so the ratio between does and buck is lower. u have to shoot does no question. justin d have u ever seen a big buck on your property well i know why.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from neuman23 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

From a management stand point, definately a doe. There is no way to tell if that spike is going to grow into a really nice buck unless you give him a chance.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

There is nothing wrong with shooting does, the meat is usually better tasting, I have all the bucks I have room for on my wall (2, 1 11 Pt ,1 9 Pt. If I ever shoot another buck ,it will have to have a MONSTER rack (hopefully atypical).

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from codyboyd wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

if there is more does than bucks try and get the ratio to about 1 buck to every 1 or 2 does. that will equal things out and give you more shooting options on bigger bucks. pass up the smaller bucks and shoot the big ones that would score at least 135+.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

from BioGuy wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Depends on: age structure, sex ratios, genetics, and your managment goals and objectives.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jestr1 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Bucks. Something that is a decent size buck with a smaller rack. The better the gene pool is for breeding the better the offspring will be the next few years. Unless your overrun by does then take a few small ones too.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

BUCKs, I never have, and never will shoot a dow!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from anjadams wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

There is definitely nothing wrong with shooting does. I agree shooting them helps the herd! Let those young bucks live and take out some of those nannys!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jordjohn44 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Obviously the answer to this is does. One buck can get hundreds of doe pregnant. You are removing multiple deer from the woods for each doe you take and only removing one for each buck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from TheEasternShore... wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

does you have to shoot them so the ratio between does and buck is lower. u have to shoot does no question. justin d have u ever seen a big buck on your property well i know why.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from IanS wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I think if you are shooting an animal just to put meat in the freezer you should shoot a doe and not shoot a buck that could become a trophy if given a few more years to live.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

For good management, you should shoot a doe for every buck you take. Unless your herd already has a one to one buck to doe ratio, you should take more than one doe for every buck. It doesn't matter whether you WANT to shoot does, you should do it for proper herd balance.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tony167n wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I would shoot does and small bucks

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does, does and more does. We have way too many does in this part of Arkansas, no one wants to shoot one. Our poor bucks run themselves to death trying to stay ahead of the dogs and to breed the 10-20 doe he's required to breed. I think if Arkansas hunters were to thin the doe herd, the bucks would grow larger and older. States that have the one to one buck to doe ratio have better herds and better bucks from what I've seen. I grew up hunting Texas where we were allowed 2 does and one buck, some years the state even let us take 2 bucks, now look at the deer numbers in Texas, some of the best deer numbers per acre as any other states.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does. Let the bucks grow to monsters.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Depends on the current status of the herd. If the does are carrying us away, then they need to be thinned a bit.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 86Ram wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Does and select bucks. The mortality rate of bucks is higher than does from what I've read.
Wild Does I've seen have any where from 1 fawn to triplets.
Like others have said so far it depends also on the ratio within the herd.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from BioGuy wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Justin D just reminded me of another important variable to add to my previous answer...geographic location. In areas that experience harsh winters harvesting does can be VERY detrimental to the deer herd. The reason is because the winter kill is a more effective method of population control than hunting. In these areas, there are often "buck only" regulations. The Adirondacks in NY is a pretty good example.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from neuman23 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

From a management stand point, definately a doe. There is no way to tell if that spike is going to grow into a really nice buck unless you give him a chance.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

There is nothing wrong with shooting does, the meat is usually better tasting, I have all the bucks I have room for on my wall (2, 1 11 Pt ,1 9 Pt. If I ever shoot another buck ,it will have to have a MONSTER rack (hopefully atypical).

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from codyboyd wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

if there is more does than bucks try and get the ratio to about 1 buck to every 1 or 2 does. that will equal things out and give you more shooting options on bigger bucks. pass up the smaller bucks and shoot the big ones that would score at least 135+.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post an Answer

bmxbiz-fs