Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Are Hookless Trout Flies All The Rage?

A new rig with hookless flies may help you catch more fish—and save more, too

A radically new idea in fishing is rare. So when Pat Moffitt, 56, a retired environmental services engineer, told me he was catching trout with hookless flies, I laughed. After a while, he convinced me that not only was he serious, but he could prove it worked. He and I went steelhead fishing last fall in some Lake Erie tributaries, where I tried his method and was amazed.

The system works. And it’s an excellent conservation tool that will allow anglers to release more fish unharmed. It’s starting out as a flyfishing technique, but it may have greater importance for live-bait anglers. It has, however, raised some controversy.

Full Circle

Moffitt’s flies (moffittangling.com) are tied on rubber tubes, each with a small round eye that can be looped on a leader with a threading tool. The rubber makes the flies flexible and provides enough friction to keep them from sliding on the line. A barbless circle hook—Moffitt’s own design—goes about a foot below the fly. You tie it on with a snell knot, with the leader coming out of the bottom of the hook eye, which ensures that the hook will rotate properly and dig in when it hits a fish’s jaw.

You fish the whole rig using any common flyfishing scheme—dry or wet flies, streamers, or nymphs. (Moffitt and I were deep-drifting egg patterns and nymphs.) When you feel or see a fish grab the fly, strike as you normally would. There’s no need to wait as you do when you’re fishing circle hooks with bait. As the leader is pulled through the fish’s mouth, the bare circle hook is pulled against the hard outside line of the fish’s jaw, where it rotates against that edge and hooks the fish. This works at least as well as hooking fish with flies tied on J-style hooks, and at no time did I feel this odd rig was causing me to miss a taking fish.

The advantage lies not in hooking more fish but in doing less damage to those you want to release. The mechanics of Moffitt’s system are such that it’s virtually impossible to hook a fish in the tongue or gullet, inside the gills, or in the eye, as sometimes happens with conventional flies. In two days of fishing with Moffitt, not once did I see anything other than fish hooked relatively harmlessly on the outside edge of the jaw.

Photo by John Merwin

Foul or Fair?

There’s been a lot of fuss on various Internet message boards to the effect that Moffitt’s rig is just a gimmicky way of snagging fish. I disagree.

Snagging, to me at least, means intentionally (or, rarely, accidentally) foul-hooking a fish that won’t take a lure, fly, or bait. In most cases it is illegal, as it should be. But Moffitt’s system won’t work at all unless a fish eats the hookless fly. The in-line circle hooks that Moffitt uses will slide across a fish’s body instead of foul-hooking it.

Things do get a little tricky, because Moffitt’s technique hooks fish on the outside of the jaw rather than the inside—a difference of maybe 1⁄4 inch. Some state rules may require fair-caught fish to be hooked inside the mouth, so check before you try this method.

The Next Step

Moffitt’s rig could turn out to be even more important to live-bait fishing. In-line circle hooks are widely recommended as a means to prevent gut-hooking—and thus killing—fish caught with baits that they quickly swallow.

Moffitt is developing a live-bait system, and he’s already had success with summer flounder and striped bass off New Jersey. Given the fundamentals here, you should also be able to adapt the method to your own fishing. The fish you release unharmed will thank you.

Comments (11)

Top Rated
All Comments
from shane wrote 34 weeks 6 days ago

If this really won't result in more missed fish, it's the best thing to happen to fishing in quite some time. I like.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 34 weeks 3 days ago

I really like the idea. This fly is good for people who catch and release all the time. What i want to know is if they come in different sizes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 34 weeks 2 days ago

Why on earth would you need this for flounder in anyway shape or form? Catch and release into hot grease.
Maybe a good idea but it won't catch on with the great majority of anglers unless it proves to catch more fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steelheadjunkie wrote 34 weeks 2 days ago

After reading “Look, Ma, No Hooks” I wanted to say this method of fishing is not that radically new. We used a similar method for dollies and rainbows in Alaska, using a bead threaded on the leader with a toothpick to hold it an inch or two above the hook to prevent injury to the fish. We fished this rig with great proficiency and I do agree this is a very effective method of hooking and releasing fish unharmed however the most obvious issue I saw is some states do not allow fishing with a bare hook and this may almost with no uncertainty constitute just that.

I would suggest checking state and local regulations before attempting.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ken wrote 34 weeks 1 day ago

either way a fish hooked ia a fish hooked,the proper way of handling and releasing is the issue that should be addressed,I'm a troller for trout and salmon and the time spent to release a return fish is minute in making sure that fish survives.More articles should address this release process!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from j-johnson17 wrote 33 weeks 6 days ago

I know a lot of guys use this method when fishing eggs. One of the most common ways I've seen is using a round glass bead that the line is threaded through, then a bare hook tied on below it. The fish will take the bead and the like will travel through the bead, and the fish is hooked on the outside of the mouth. I think it saves quite a few spawning fish...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from muskiemaster wrote 33 weeks 4 days ago

sounds as if it could be a little difficult to set the hook right on time, but i wouldn't know never heard of anything like this until now.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from cbsnowman wrote 33 weeks 4 days ago

I have seen local fly fisherman doing this all the time. Some wont even put a hook on they are just looking and seeing what the trout are wanting to eat. I think its a reat idea just that with some of todays super lines and leaders you have to watch that you dont cut the fish or it get to tangled in the line.I even heard of guys useing this for catfish, tying a chicken liver to the line and slowly pulling those cats in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

why not just put a circle hook in the fly and be legal in all fifty states. circle hooks are a little different to fish and there is no setting the hook, so i dont understand why the seperation of fly and hook. is it so you can "set the hook". i fish almost exclusively with circle hooks in the coastal carolina waters i fish in and i havent had a problem if the fish are handled right during de hooking and release. that is where we do the most damage. it doesnt matter where the hook is when we damage the slime coat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from pikepredator wrote 32 weeks 4 days ago

sorry Mr. Merwin, but it's going to be our local WCOs eyeglassing us from shore to determing if this is snagging or not. Before any of us try this method we'd better be contacting our states fish commissions to be sure. Enticing a fish to take a hookless lure/fly/bait and then yanking a bare hook from a foot below sure sounds like snagging to me. I fish the Erie tribs and the lake out of Erie, PA and have found our WCOs to be less than forgiving. Just my opinion.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigjake wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I thought the whole idea behind the circle hook was to not set the hook, but instead simply start reeling and allow the hook to rotate in the fish's mouth and stick into the side of its jaw...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from shane wrote 34 weeks 6 days ago

If this really won't result in more missed fish, it's the best thing to happen to fishing in quite some time. I like.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JCDunn wrote 34 weeks 6 days ago

This is NOT knew. The same concept has been used by bill anglers for years with a wool ribbon. You can not even for a split second put slack in your line. Now go meet some single Anglers at www.CupidFish.com

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from pikepredator wrote 32 weeks 4 days ago

sorry Mr. Merwin, but it's going to be our local WCOs eyeglassing us from shore to determing if this is snagging or not. Before any of us try this method we'd better be contacting our states fish commissions to be sure. Enticing a fish to take a hookless lure/fly/bait and then yanking a bare hook from a foot below sure sounds like snagging to me. I fish the Erie tribs and the lake out of Erie, PA and have found our WCOs to be less than forgiving. Just my opinion.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigjake wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I thought the whole idea behind the circle hook was to not set the hook, but instead simply start reeling and allow the hook to rotate in the fish's mouth and stick into the side of its jaw...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 34 weeks 3 days ago

I really like the idea. This fly is good for people who catch and release all the time. What i want to know is if they come in different sizes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 34 weeks 2 days ago

Why on earth would you need this for flounder in anyway shape or form? Catch and release into hot grease.
Maybe a good idea but it won't catch on with the great majority of anglers unless it proves to catch more fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steelheadjunkie wrote 34 weeks 2 days ago

After reading “Look, Ma, No Hooks” I wanted to say this method of fishing is not that radically new. We used a similar method for dollies and rainbows in Alaska, using a bead threaded on the leader with a toothpick to hold it an inch or two above the hook to prevent injury to the fish. We fished this rig with great proficiency and I do agree this is a very effective method of hooking and releasing fish unharmed however the most obvious issue I saw is some states do not allow fishing with a bare hook and this may almost with no uncertainty constitute just that.

I would suggest checking state and local regulations before attempting.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ken wrote 34 weeks 1 day ago

either way a fish hooked ia a fish hooked,the proper way of handling and releasing is the issue that should be addressed,I'm a troller for trout and salmon and the time spent to release a return fish is minute in making sure that fish survives.More articles should address this release process!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from j-johnson17 wrote 33 weeks 6 days ago

I know a lot of guys use this method when fishing eggs. One of the most common ways I've seen is using a round glass bead that the line is threaded through, then a bare hook tied on below it. The fish will take the bead and the like will travel through the bead, and the fish is hooked on the outside of the mouth. I think it saves quite a few spawning fish...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from muskiemaster wrote 33 weeks 4 days ago

sounds as if it could be a little difficult to set the hook right on time, but i wouldn't know never heard of anything like this until now.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from cbsnowman wrote 33 weeks 4 days ago

I have seen local fly fisherman doing this all the time. Some wont even put a hook on they are just looking and seeing what the trout are wanting to eat. I think its a reat idea just that with some of todays super lines and leaders you have to watch that you dont cut the fish or it get to tangled in the line.I even heard of guys useing this for catfish, tying a chicken liver to the line and slowly pulling those cats in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

why not just put a circle hook in the fly and be legal in all fifty states. circle hooks are a little different to fish and there is no setting the hook, so i dont understand why the seperation of fly and hook. is it so you can "set the hook". i fish almost exclusively with circle hooks in the coastal carolina waters i fish in and i havent had a problem if the fish are handled right during de hooking and release. that is where we do the most damage. it doesnt matter where the hook is when we damage the slime coat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment