The late William Batterman Ruger was a genius. Again and again, amidst croaking and muttering that this time he’d lose his shirt, he resurrected guns of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, modernized the designs, then made a fortune on each new iteration. Once, he went back 2,500 years for inspiration and reinvented the lost art of investment casting, which was used to make jewelry for the pharaohs of Egypt.
So it would be fair to surmise that he might not care for the Ruger American Rifle, which is thoroughly 21st century and owes nothing to anything found in the past. Bill Ruger was very fond of good rifles, however, and the RAR, as we will call it, is a good rifle. And then some.
Clever Curve
When you design a firearm, you usually start with the magazine, and here, Ruger engineers did something clever. The RAR’s magazine is detachable, which is not unusual, but it’s also rotary, which is highly unusual in a centerfire rifle. The bottom of the shallow four-round box is curved, rather than flat. This allowed Ruger (the engineers, not Bill) to design a slim, molded stock that follows the profile of the magazine. As a result, the stock’s bottom is curved, too, rather than the customary flat. The stock also comes with a good recoil pad.
Embedded in the stock, lurking beneath the front receiver ring, is Ruger’s Power Bedding system. This consists of four opposing angled aluminum bedding blocks that fit into corresponding grooves in the receiver. When you tighten the bedding screws, they pull the receiver straight down and wedge it into place, all of which contributes to the rifle’s extraordinary accuracy.
Unlike Ruger’s Model 77 bolt-action rifle, which is essentially a Mauser, the RAR has a receiver that is mostly enclosed, making it much stiffer, and a three-lug bolt with a short 70-degree lift. There is no rotating Mauser extractor; it’s been replaced by a sliding extractor on one of the lugs and a plunger-style ejector. The new action works extremely well and is very fast in operation.
Of course, a new action needs a new trigger, and this one is called the Ruger Marksman Adjustable Trigger. It adjusts between 3 and 5 pounds via a nice big screw on the trigger housing. My rifle’s trigger scaled 41⁄2 pounds with some creep, but the adjustment screw got that down to 31⁄2 (no further), and as I shot the rifle more, the creep vanished. A great trigger it ain’t, but it’s a huge improvement over the Model 77 trigger.
The safety is on the tang, and it falls right under your thumb. There are no iron sights; the rifle comes with Weaver-style bases.
Right now, the RAR comes in .243, .308, .270, and .30/06. The barrels for all four calibers are 22 inches long, the best length for non-magnum calibers, rather than the more common 24 inches that many manufacturers use across their lines to save money. Someone at Ruger deserves a medal for this decision, as it helps ensure accuracy.
Sure Sign
My test rifle—a production-line .30/06—did not like most of the factory ammo I fed it. The notable exceptions were Remington 180-grain Core-Lokts, which shot into 11⁄4-inch groups; and Federal match ammo, which went into a 1⁄2-inch group. The rifle would place two shots next to each other and then send the third way off on the horizon—the signature of a rifle that’s very accurate but not quite digesting what you’re feeding it.
Sure enough, when I gave it handloads, the RAR delivered trouser--messing accuracy. With four different loads and three different bullet weights, it shot well under an inch, and on more than one occasion the RAR delivered sub-half-minute spreads.
The RAR is light, tough, slick-handling, accurate, and affordable (it lists for $449, but I’ve seen it advertised on the Internet for $100 less). If you can think of something else that should go into a hunting rifle, let me know, because I can’t.
From the July 2012 issue of Field & Stream magazine.
Comments (11)
when this rifle was first introduced i thought that this was a rifle that i would have designed if i was a rifle manufacturer. everything you need for hunting at a price point that no one can argue with. calibers offered are certainly adequate for hunting most anything. i however would like a different caliber. something on the order of the .280 ackley or the 6.5-284 or maybe an entirely new 7mm ruger magnum. when you think back to what happened to the remington model 700 and the then new 7mm remington magnum , a rifle and caliber combo that would make the gun writers slobber all over themselves with excitement would seem to make sense. judging by the price of ruger stock lately the big boys at ruger seem to know what they are doing , so who am i to argue.
Hey its nice in see but i did never use it before, how is shooting................as its soft like handguns
I guess it's because I'm a Savage honk, but I really don't see what is so amazing about the Ruger American. The two biggest features are the "new" trigger system and the "new" rifle bedding system, both of which can be found with a Savage already (AccuStock and AccuTrigger). And the price point is right in line with a Marlin XL-7, Savage 111, Mossberg 4x4, Weatherby Vangaurd, etc. Long story short, I'm sure it's a great gun, but I don't think it's worth all the hype that it is receiving.
I would prefer a rifle that will shoot any ammo straight. I don't understand this part of the story. A bolt action should not have any such problem!
The fact that the rifle shot handloads so accurate says something. It must be a very inherently accurate rifle. Ruger used to have a problem with its barrels; when they warmed up, they would writhe like a snake, throwing shots all over the place. That was most likely due to using hammer-forged barrels that had not been properly stress relieved. The hammer-forging process can create stresses in metal that causes it to "uncoil" when heated up. That's why I prefer broach-cut rifling or at least button rifling over hammer-forging.
You may celebrate another entry into the "Disposable Rifle" category [e.g. Rem.770, SAVAGE AXIS, MOSSBERG 100ATR ETC.] but I for one do not champion this movement. While these guns may be cheap and are certainly ugly, I did not read one thing in your report, that should have made anyone want one. Accuracy that only handloading or Match Ammo could wring out, a trigger that at its' lowest is still 3.5lbs. and creepy. For the same price or less, a person can buy a Howa 1500 or Weatherby Vanguard on Gunbroker [or elsewhere] have it delivered to their local gunshop and it WILL SHOOT CIRCLES AROUND THIS "American" POOR EXCUSE FOR GUNMAKING, and look better doing it. If Ruger has to appeal to our patriotism to sell this thing, then they have sunk to new lows.
Any problems with the magazine reported?
I would love to give a report on the rifle I purchased, but the flimsy tab in the detachable magazine broke the first time I loaded rounds! And no, I did not try to force rounds straight down like I read in one review.
I have a call into Ruger, and hopefully they will make things right!
I have this rifle in .30-06 and it shoots extremely well. I ran 20 rounds of factory through it without any issues of accuracy but I can confirm that my Nosler hand loads dropped my best pattern down small enough to cover with a quarter at 100 yards. Great price point on a Made in America rifle that shoots well. Good work Ruger.
I don't agree with the guy who wrote this article.This past
Friday I purchased a 270 RAR went to the range and shot 1/2 in.MOA at 100yds with factory ammo.Personally I would recommend the 270 to anyone that hunts.
Every rifle is different and unique. But for a factory rifle at $450 and less to shoot 1 MOA or under off the shelf, there is nothing to complain about. Try that with a Rem 700 and you are doing some serious $$$$ costs on what Remmy should have done from their end, not us on the consumer end. The sales are shifting to Ruger / Marlin / Savage / Tikka for the average blue collar consumer to spend the hard money saved on some ammo where he can find it to shoot.
I am amazed what what is at Wal-Mart and Academy store racks for prices they are selling at compared to 15 years ago. The consumer has it better than ever on rifles, ammo, ammo reloading, and optics. With the excess of $$$ in the gun / ammo market, it is time for a little research and development to launch new products to capture the market where the consumer is the one who wins out. The consumer really has no excuse not to put meat in the freezer if he does his part out there.
Post a Comment
I guess it's because I'm a Savage honk, but I really don't see what is so amazing about the Ruger American. The two biggest features are the "new" trigger system and the "new" rifle bedding system, both of which can be found with a Savage already (AccuStock and AccuTrigger). And the price point is right in line with a Marlin XL-7, Savage 111, Mossberg 4x4, Weatherby Vangaurd, etc. Long story short, I'm sure it's a great gun, but I don't think it's worth all the hype that it is receiving.
Every rifle is different and unique. But for a factory rifle at $450 and less to shoot 1 MOA or under off the shelf, there is nothing to complain about. Try that with a Rem 700 and you are doing some serious $$$$ costs on what Remmy should have done from their end, not us on the consumer end. The sales are shifting to Ruger / Marlin / Savage / Tikka for the average blue collar consumer to spend the hard money saved on some ammo where he can find it to shoot.
I am amazed what what is at Wal-Mart and Academy store racks for prices they are selling at compared to 15 years ago. The consumer has it better than ever on rifles, ammo, ammo reloading, and optics. With the excess of $$$ in the gun / ammo market, it is time for a little research and development to launch new products to capture the market where the consumer is the one who wins out. The consumer really has no excuse not to put meat in the freezer if he does his part out there.
when this rifle was first introduced i thought that this was a rifle that i would have designed if i was a rifle manufacturer. everything you need for hunting at a price point that no one can argue with. calibers offered are certainly adequate for hunting most anything. i however would like a different caliber. something on the order of the .280 ackley or the 6.5-284 or maybe an entirely new 7mm ruger magnum. when you think back to what happened to the remington model 700 and the then new 7mm remington magnum , a rifle and caliber combo that would make the gun writers slobber all over themselves with excitement would seem to make sense. judging by the price of ruger stock lately the big boys at ruger seem to know what they are doing , so who am i to argue.
Hey its nice in see but i did never use it before, how is shooting................as its soft like handguns
I would prefer a rifle that will shoot any ammo straight. I don't understand this part of the story. A bolt action should not have any such problem!
The fact that the rifle shot handloads so accurate says something. It must be a very inherently accurate rifle. Ruger used to have a problem with its barrels; when they warmed up, they would writhe like a snake, throwing shots all over the place. That was most likely due to using hammer-forged barrels that had not been properly stress relieved. The hammer-forging process can create stresses in metal that causes it to "uncoil" when heated up. That's why I prefer broach-cut rifling or at least button rifling over hammer-forging.
You may celebrate another entry into the "Disposable Rifle" category [e.g. Rem.770, SAVAGE AXIS, MOSSBERG 100ATR ETC.] but I for one do not champion this movement. While these guns may be cheap and are certainly ugly, I did not read one thing in your report, that should have made anyone want one. Accuracy that only handloading or Match Ammo could wring out, a trigger that at its' lowest is still 3.5lbs. and creepy. For the same price or less, a person can buy a Howa 1500 or Weatherby Vanguard on Gunbroker [or elsewhere] have it delivered to their local gunshop and it WILL SHOOT CIRCLES AROUND THIS "American" POOR EXCUSE FOR GUNMAKING, and look better doing it. If Ruger has to appeal to our patriotism to sell this thing, then they have sunk to new lows.
Any problems with the magazine reported?
I would love to give a report on the rifle I purchased, but the flimsy tab in the detachable magazine broke the first time I loaded rounds! And no, I did not try to force rounds straight down like I read in one review.
I have a call into Ruger, and hopefully they will make things right!
I have this rifle in .30-06 and it shoots extremely well. I ran 20 rounds of factory through it without any issues of accuracy but I can confirm that my Nosler hand loads dropped my best pattern down small enough to cover with a quarter at 100 yards. Great price point on a Made in America rifle that shoots well. Good work Ruger.
I don't agree with the guy who wrote this article.This past
Friday I purchased a 270 RAR went to the range and shot 1/2 in.MOA at 100yds with factory ammo.Personally I would recommend the 270 to anyone that hunts.
Post a Comment