
This past spring, my three finalist rifles for Field & Stream’s 2012 Best of the Best Awards (see the September issue for the winner), all unaltered factory bolt actions in the low to medium price range, shot not only sub-MOA but sub-half-MOA. I’ve never seen anything like this before, but I’m not surprised. The finalists shared various attributes—which are found on many other factory rifles as well—that are responsible for this astounding improvement in accuracy, and among them are these:
Glass Bedding
This technique employs epoxy—by itself, combined with fiberglass, or mixed with metal particles. It’s a cheap, permanent way to get a perfect bedding job for a rifle action, and it is used either by itself or in combination with pillar bedding. Rather than painstakingly shaping the stock to fit the action, you slap a glob of glass into the action mortise, clamp the stock and the barreled action together, and let the adhesive harden. The result is a perfect, permanent, fit.
Pillar Bedding
Benchrest shooters knew as far back as 1970 or so that rifle actions tended to squirm in the stock under the stress of firing; they also suffered from unequal stress on the bedding screws. The cure was to bed actions on two aluminum tubes, or pillars, that were permanently glued into the stock. This provided rigid metal-on-metal contact, rather than metal on wood.
Free-Floating Barrels
Before Elvis got fat, the hallmark of a good rifle was a nice, tight fit between the fore-end and barrel. But achieving this in a mass-produced rifle was nearly impossible; even if the factory pulled it off, the wood invariably shrank or swelled, putting all sorts of conflicting pressures on the barrel, causing it to shoot erratically. Today, just about all rifles, wood- and synthetic-stocked, factory and custom, have free-floating barrels where there is no contact from the chamber forward.
Decent Triggers
It follows as the night does the day that if you have to fight your trigger to make your rifle go off, none of the groups are going to be very good. Safe triggers with light, clean pulls date back to 2002 when Savage introduced its adjustable AccuTrigger. A modification of the two-stage or military trigger, it is the foaming crest on a tidal wave of good triggers that have followed in its wake.
Good Barrels
A good barrel must be perfectly straight, have its crown cut perfectly square with the bore, and have the bore drilled precisely through its center. In addition, the rifling grooves and lands must be of exactly the same depth all the way from the muzzle to the chamber. This is simple stuff, but it requires considerable care in manufacture. There are still plenty of rotten factory barrels out there, but I’m seeing a lot more good ones now.
Fast Lock Time
Lock time is the interval between the sear’s releasing the firing pin and the firing pin’s striking the primer. Short lock time and light firing-pin falls make for accuracy. Why? Because in the interval between when you squeeze the trigger and when the rifle goes off, you can do something that will disturb your aim. And a heavy firing pin crashing down can jar you off target.
From the August 2012 issue of Field & Stream magazine.
Photo by Lee Kjos/The Raw Spirit (Hunter)
Comments (9)
Dave,
I agree, my two most accurate rifles are both Savage factory rifles in 22-250 and .308. Both have the Accustock and Accutrigger the 22-250 actually has the Target Accutrigger. The 22-250 is definitely capable of sub half MOA accuracy. They both have free floated, fluted bull barrels with target crowns. So I think they have all of the charateristics you mentioned and are certainly tack drivers.
I have the same 22-250 savage rifle It never misses.... and my target is usually a small 1/4 inch dot on a plain piece of paper, the rifle will shoot that same point all day long with federal factory ammo. Because of that rifles accuracy I now own the model 111 30-06, model 110 .243, the 17cal target rifle, and a. 22cal all weather rifle i have taken on canoe trips. SAVAGE knows guns and the accuracy of even the 30-06 hunting rifle is sub-moa with remington core-lokt ammo
Petzal, uncharacteristically is right is his assessments of accuracy enhancements from factory rifledom these days. I have neither the wisdom nor the experience he has, BUT I do have two EXTREMELY accurate .22 cal rifles on hand. One made in the early 1950's, a Winchester Model 52 (.22 lr) with the bull bbl., rare and with an Unertl Scope on it(original iron sights are Redfield Olympics) . . . a sub MOA tackdriver with most any sub-sonic fodder you can pour down the tube. The other is a STAG Arms Model 6 Super Varmint (AR-15) that shoots Winshester 55 gr Ballistic SilverTip missles through the same .405 hole on a good day all day long. It has a NIKON Monarch 6 to 24X - 50mm scope on it (pretty good optics) and a good factory match trigger also. Needless to say, these 100 yd results are from a bench, cool, calm air, modulated breathing, the works. My point is that sometimes accuracy is just inherent in the combo of gun-shooter-environs, etc., and you MAY NOY NEED all of the fancy bells and whistles of bedding, pillars, and so forth. I do need to say however, that the STAG ARMS rifle has a bull stainless bbl., which their customeer service people say is lead lapped into perfection, needing no break-in. I am inclined to believe them. The Win 52 was lead lapped with bullets, 10's of thousands of them (50' gallery competition)!
Today I just read where a Montana Rifle Company customer was sighting in his new rifle (in a sled) and thought there was something wrong, until he realized his follow-on shots were going into the same hole (Woodland Custom .25-06); I read the customers email. I also spoke with a dealer in Idaho who shot one of their XWR-SS production rifles in .30-06 in a sled and was getting .25 MOA. Now that is awesome. I've shot their rifles and have some on order, I cannot wait!
Great article DEP. Of all these, I find that the barrel with its proper chambering is the most significant. Glass bedding would be my next in importance.They are all getting better at it but it does cost them more to manufacture a barrel that is near perfect. We are certainly seeing a lot more of them but can still get a clunker once in a while over the counter. The custom barrels now days are an upgrade that works almost every time.
I agree about the new savage rifles. I purchased a Savage Weathermaster in .300 Win-Mag for an African Safari. After sighting in/ breaking in the barrel I went to the range for a quick and mech needed confidence booster. Three shots later it was a classic clover leaf 1 inch over the bullseye. The ammo it liked was the Hornady SST 180 grain. Next new rifle will be a Savage for sure.
There was a time when there were many MOA rifles just not many MOA shooters.Now that we have a lot of veterans returning from over seas low and behold its a miracle rifles shoot better. I think we just have better marksmen not better rifles even with all the add ons which do help. I believe the average 20 something who served a hitch over seas is a much better rifle shot then we are use to seeing. This is true at my range were I see many young vets printing incredible groups with older rifles deemed inaccurate by their previous owners and why I see game taken at longer ranges than I previously thought possible.These guys and gals are the next generation of hunters and they are extremely capable if the rifles get much better we all might be playing golf in a few years, Chilling thought I know
I was reading a comment written by duckdog07 about veterans and thier shooting abilities. As a veteran I spent a fair amount of time slinging 556 rounds down range which allowed me to become a much better shooter. Practice makes perfect whether your shooting deer in Michigan or Insurgents in Iraq. I think the edge military shooters have is economically based. A day at the range for an Army SGT costs nothing. While a day at the range for a 20 yr old college student is quite expensive. While I truly appreciate the nod I just wanted to share a pov from someone who is now footing the bill for my range time.
I appreciate both of you alls service to our country. I served several tours in hell myself. But being in the service doesnt help some peoples shooting abilities. Ive witnessed that. Tikka for the win.
Post a Comment
I have the same 22-250 savage rifle It never misses.... and my target is usually a small 1/4 inch dot on a plain piece of paper, the rifle will shoot that same point all day long with federal factory ammo. Because of that rifles accuracy I now own the model 111 30-06, model 110 .243, the 17cal target rifle, and a. 22cal all weather rifle i have taken on canoe trips. SAVAGE knows guns and the accuracy of even the 30-06 hunting rifle is sub-moa with remington core-lokt ammo
Petzal, uncharacteristically is right is his assessments of accuracy enhancements from factory rifledom these days. I have neither the wisdom nor the experience he has, BUT I do have two EXTREMELY accurate .22 cal rifles on hand. One made in the early 1950's, a Winchester Model 52 (.22 lr) with the bull bbl., rare and with an Unertl Scope on it(original iron sights are Redfield Olympics) . . . a sub MOA tackdriver with most any sub-sonic fodder you can pour down the tube. The other is a STAG Arms Model 6 Super Varmint (AR-15) that shoots Winshester 55 gr Ballistic SilverTip missles through the same .405 hole on a good day all day long. It has a NIKON Monarch 6 to 24X - 50mm scope on it (pretty good optics) and a good factory match trigger also. Needless to say, these 100 yd results are from a bench, cool, calm air, modulated breathing, the works. My point is that sometimes accuracy is just inherent in the combo of gun-shooter-environs, etc., and you MAY NOY NEED all of the fancy bells and whistles of bedding, pillars, and so forth. I do need to say however, that the STAG ARMS rifle has a bull stainless bbl., which their customeer service people say is lead lapped into perfection, needing no break-in. I am inclined to believe them. The Win 52 was lead lapped with bullets, 10's of thousands of them (50' gallery competition)!
I agree about the new savage rifles. I purchased a Savage Weathermaster in .300 Win-Mag for an African Safari. After sighting in/ breaking in the barrel I went to the range for a quick and mech needed confidence booster. Three shots later it was a classic clover leaf 1 inch over the bullseye. The ammo it liked was the Hornady SST 180 grain. Next new rifle will be a Savage for sure.
Dave,
I agree, my two most accurate rifles are both Savage factory rifles in 22-250 and .308. Both have the Accustock and Accutrigger the 22-250 actually has the Target Accutrigger. The 22-250 is definitely capable of sub half MOA accuracy. They both have free floated, fluted bull barrels with target crowns. So I think they have all of the charateristics you mentioned and are certainly tack drivers.
Today I just read where a Montana Rifle Company customer was sighting in his new rifle (in a sled) and thought there was something wrong, until he realized his follow-on shots were going into the same hole (Woodland Custom .25-06); I read the customers email. I also spoke with a dealer in Idaho who shot one of their XWR-SS production rifles in .30-06 in a sled and was getting .25 MOA. Now that is awesome. I've shot their rifles and have some on order, I cannot wait!
Great article DEP. Of all these, I find that the barrel with its proper chambering is the most significant. Glass bedding would be my next in importance.They are all getting better at it but it does cost them more to manufacture a barrel that is near perfect. We are certainly seeing a lot more of them but can still get a clunker once in a while over the counter. The custom barrels now days are an upgrade that works almost every time.
There was a time when there were many MOA rifles just not many MOA shooters.Now that we have a lot of veterans returning from over seas low and behold its a miracle rifles shoot better. I think we just have better marksmen not better rifles even with all the add ons which do help. I believe the average 20 something who served a hitch over seas is a much better rifle shot then we are use to seeing. This is true at my range were I see many young vets printing incredible groups with older rifles deemed inaccurate by their previous owners and why I see game taken at longer ranges than I previously thought possible.These guys and gals are the next generation of hunters and they are extremely capable if the rifles get much better we all might be playing golf in a few years, Chilling thought I know
I was reading a comment written by duckdog07 about veterans and thier shooting abilities. As a veteran I spent a fair amount of time slinging 556 rounds down range which allowed me to become a much better shooter. Practice makes perfect whether your shooting deer in Michigan or Insurgents in Iraq. I think the edge military shooters have is economically based. A day at the range for an Army SGT costs nothing. While a day at the range for a 20 yr old college student is quite expensive. While I truly appreciate the nod I just wanted to share a pov from someone who is now footing the bill for my range time.
I appreciate both of you alls service to our country. I served several tours in hell myself. But being in the service doesnt help some peoples shooting abilities. Ive witnessed that. Tikka for the win.
Post a Comment