Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Hunting
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • March 18, 2010

    Arizona House Committee Okays Knife-Rights Bill

    From the AZ Capitol Times:
    Cities, counties and other governmental entities would be forbidden from restricting people’s use of knives under a bill winding its way through the legislative process.

    The bill, S1153, would give the state sole power to impose regulation on knives. It was approved March 16 by the House Government Committee.

    “We believe that knives are essential tools, tools that are used daily by millions of honest Americans,” said Doug Ritter, chairman of Knife Rights, an advocacy group that is pushing the bill.…

    Ritter’s group is using Arizona as a launching pad for a national knife-law-preemption campaign.

    “It’s a matter of fairness, a matter of civil rights,” he said.

  • March 17, 2010

    Chad Love: Further Defense of the Clean Water Restoration Act

    A number of readers questioned both the validity and sourcing of a blog post I wrote last week concerning threats to the Clean Water Act. My information came from the New York Times, you see, so it must have an agenda.
     
    Fair enough. But here's one that says basically the same thing, and it was published in that bastion of liberal socialism, Wildfowl magazine. And not to be outdone, those left-leaning folks at Ducks Unlimited have voiced their radical agenda on the issue as well. So what other liberal groups out there ar throwing their support behind this un-American, anti-free market legislation?
     
    Let's see... Trout Unlimited. The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. The American Sportfishing Association. Whitetails Unlimited. The North American Grouse Partnership. The list goes on and on and on.
     
    Glenn Beck and James Inhofe must be apoplectic at the thought of so many granola-crunching socialist hippies.
     
    I can't think of one mainstream, sportsman-based conservation organization out there that doesn't support the Clean Water Restoration Act, and there's a very good reason for that: clean water is the basis, the keystone for everything. Without clean, unpolluted water there's no trout, no ducks, no deer, no elk, no bass, no birds, and no us. But there are people out there who would have you believe that every piece of environmental legislation is unnecessary, wasteful, anti-business and a radical socialist plot.  Who are you going to believe?

  • February 19, 2010

    Cermele: Your Worst Fishing Habits

    In fishing there are rules that apply to all species in all bodies of water. Know what's behind you before you cast. Never reel against the drag. Keep constant pressure on the fish. We seem to have no problem following most of these fishing commandments, but there are also many that slip through the cracks more often than not. They are the rules that should absolutely become habit, yet they are overlooked in the heat of the moment. Here are the three no-brainer rules that I disobey most.

    Hook Sharpening: It takes no effort to carry a small file on your person or in your tackle box. In less than ten seconds, you can give most hooks a razor's edge, or at least make them a little sharper than they might have been. I read about it, I know it's important, yet with the exception of shark fishing, I rarely sharpen my hooks. I think part of the problem  is that packs of worm hooks, smaller bait hooks, and jigheads are seen as throw-aways. You kill one pack and buy another. What's funny is that I'll replace rusted lure hooks, but don't sharpen them too much when they're clean. So starting this spring, no matter where I fish, I vow to not be without a file.

    Knot Checking: I'm anal when it comes to tying knots. If wraps don't line up properly, if the cinch doesn't feel right, I'll cut it off and tie it again. Sometimes I just get a vibe that a knot is bad, even if nothing looks wrong. But once I'm happy with the connection, I'll admit that I don't periodically check the knot for weakness or abrasion enough. If I'm chasing bluefish, yeah, I'll retie after almost every hook-up, but even bluegills can tax a knot after a while, and I've been bitten many times by assuming my connection was still sound.

    Fly Line Cleaning: I own a bunch of fly outfits, and every spring before the season starts, I'll diligently strip the line off each reel, then clean and dress it. Tell you what, those first few trips, that line flies. I love that feeling. Ten trips in and I come home tired, dirty, and in no mood to perform this task. It doesn't bother me until I'm trying to hit a riser fifty feet away and the line is flowing like the guides are ringed with heavy-grit sand paper. This is another bad habit I intend to change this year.

    So I've laid my cards on the table, now it's your turn. Let's hear your worst fishing habits.  - JC

  • January 22, 2010

    Chad Love: Florida Python Cast & Blast

    Much has been written about south Florida's problems with non-native giant snakes, but according to this story officials are now faced with the frightening prospect of hybrid "super snakes" slithering amok.

    Fears of a new "super snake" emerging in the Everglades grew this week during a hunt to track South Florida's invasive python population. A three-day, state-coordinated hunt that started Tuesday had, by Wednesday, turned up at least five African rock pythons -- including a 14-foot-long female -- in a targeted area in Miami-Dade County. Those findings add to concerns that the African rock python is a new breeding population in the Everglades and not just the result of a few overgrown pets being released into the wild, according to the South Florida Water Management District.
     
    In addition, state environmental officials worry that the rock python could breed with the Burmese python, which already has an established foothold in the Everglades. That could lead to a new "super snake," said George Horne, the water district's deputy executive director. In Africa, the rock python eats creatures as large as goats and crocodiles. There have been cases of the snakes killing children. "They are bigger and meaner than the Burmese python. It's not good news," said Deborah Drum, deputy director of the district's restoration sciences department.

     
    Personally, I think this is a great cast-n-blast opportunity for outdoorsmen from boring old native-fauna-only states like mine. I've always wanted to fish for peacock bass in the canals around Miami-Dade. What if you combined that with a trophy hybrid "super snake" hunting trip? Lots of guys travel to the southern states to hunt alligators. Why not giant snakes? It's becoming more and more apparent that exotic constrictors are established, and they're there to stay. And I have to admit, the prospect of hunting a creature pushing twenty feet long is intriguing. If the price was right, would you travel to hunt such a super snake?

  • December 8, 2009

    Cermele: Why Your Wife Will Go to Bass Pro This Christmas

    Thanksgiving is over. I know this because every commercial on TV is now Christmas-related. I don’t generally pay attention to these rants about sales and holiday cheer, but I noticed something interesting this year. Bass Pro Shops is running loads of commercials, and I’m not talking about just on Versus and the Outdoor Channel. I’m talking Bravo and Lifetime. Why? Because these commercials are targeted at wives who don't fish. Here’s why they’re genius.

    I don’t have any kids, but know plenty of people with little ones that cough up $20 or $40 to plop them on some mangy Santa’s lap in the local mall for a photo. My wife will fish on occasion, but spending a day at Bass Pro or Cabela’s is, for her, a fate worse than death. I’m sure she’s not the only woman that feels this way. Which is why this Bass Pro commercial only highlights the “Santa’s Wonderland” display, complete with crafts for the kids, elves, and free photos with Santa. You won’t find any reference to hunting or fishing. In fact, if you didn’t know what Bass Pro sold, you wouldn’t learn it from the commercial.

    What Bass Pro has done is given the man with a non-hunting or -fishing wife and kids the opportunity to say “you know honey, I know where we can get free photos with Santa this year and where the kids can make Christmas crafts and play games.” You become the hero, and once she’s through the door, you can go scope the latest Christmas tackle sales and stock up for that winter crappie and muskie action.

    So as a recently married dude without kids, I ask you, the wiser married masses: would this commercial be enough incentive to get your whole family into Bass Pro Shops during the holidays? - JC

  • December 4, 2009

    Chad Love: Let Hunting Change the World

    Here's an interesting story via the blog of former Field & Stream editor and noted vampire expert Scott Bowen.
     
    Researchers at the University of Rochester have discovered that exposure to nature can actually change how we view the world.
     
    From the story:
    "...a recent article by researchers at the University of Rochester shows that experiences with nature can affect more than our mood. In a series of studies, Netta Weinstein, Andrew Przybylski, and Richard Ryan, University of Rochester, show that ...

    ... exposure to nature can affect our priorities and alter what we think is important in life. In short, we become less self-focused and more other-focused. Our value priorities shift from personal gain, to a broader focus on community and connection with others.

    To demonstrate this effect, they ran a series of studies. In their first study, the researchers randomly assigned individuals to view a slide show that either depicted scenes of human-made or natural environments. The slides were matched across a variety of characteristics, to eliminate the possibility that the results were due to things like color, complexity, or brightness of the images. The participants were instructed to try to immerse themselves in the images—to notice the colors and textures and imagine the sounds and smells. After watching the slide show (which took about 8 minutes), the participants completed a series of questions about their life aspirations."

    "...These results are part of a growing body of evidence showing the powerful effect of natural experiences. And, for people like me who enjoy spending time in nature, the results are encouraging. However, when viewed within a larger societal context, the results also provide an intriguing perspective on some noted shifts in the values and priorities or Americans over the past 40 years. People living in the United States are spending much less time outdoors today than ever before. Data from a variety of sources show that on average, Americans are spending less time outdoors today than they did 30 or even 20 years ago. Children tend to spend more time outside than do adults, but that number too is declining. With the growth of Internet, social networking, on-demand programming, and computer games, there is more to keep us inside than there is to draw us out into the natural environment."

    We've discussed the topic on this very blog a number of times, so far be it from me to continue beating a dead horse. It is, however, nice to see some empirical data to support our anecdotal certainty that the therapeutic and life-enhancing qualities of an HD-free lifestyle are very real. That's why I've always believed that people who hunt, fish, hike, birdwatch or engage in any other nature-based activity tend to be - on average - much happier, less stressed and more laid-back than their angst-ridden concrete-dwelling cousins.

    It's becoming an accepted scientific certitude that having some individual relationship with nature - in whatever form it takes - is a touchstone of a healthy, well-adjusted person. The big question is: how to achieve it? Greener urban planning? School programs? More public land? Shooting the Playstation and smashing the cell phone? Good ideas, all.

    But I see it as a perfect, gift-wrapped opportunity to promote the holistic and mental-health qualities of hunting and fishing. Hell, market it as shotgun-based Tai Chi. Whatever it takes to get the message out there, because the old paradigms and the old arguments - however valid they still are - are falling on deaf ears. Reinvention, re-making, rebranding; that's the lubricant of modern society's engine. Change, adapt or die. May not be right, but it is what it is, and if I were a state game agency, a hunting or fishing/based conservation organization or, yes, a hook-and-bullet magazine, I'd be firing my marketing department if they didn't run with all this new research. I hate to say it, but we've got to figure out a way to make hunting and fishing...trendy.

  • November 17, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Do You Trust Your State Fish And Game Agency?

    From a Southwick Associates Press Release:
    In an October 2009 survey, Southwick Associates asked anglers and hunters which type of organization they trust the most for accurate information regarding fish and wildlife conservation. The results of the monthly AnglerSurvey.com and HunterSurvey.com poll show that state fish and wildlife agencies are considered the most trustworthy source of conservation information among hunters and anglers.

    Of the 2,771 anglers surveyed, 54.4 percent reported state fish and wildlife agencies were their most trusted source. Of the 3,378 hunters surveyed, 50.7 percent agreed.  The second most trusted source, with 25.1 percent of anglers and 29.5 percent of hunters, was sport-fishing and hunting non-profit conservation groups.

    Other options included federal agencies, outdoor television, and outdoor print media. Who do you trust most?

  • October 28, 2009

    Chad Love: The Zombie Plague

    Sometimes you read something that - to be perfectly honest - leaves you feeling hopeless and doomed. Something so depressing it makes you want to throw up your hands, shout "to hell with it all!" and head straight to the nearest bar. Something like this, from the LA Times.
     
    The latest figures from Nielsen have children's TV usage at an eight-year high. Children's health advocates warn of adverse effects.
     
    More than an entire day -- that's how long children sit in front of the television in an average week, according to new findings released Monday by Nielsen.

    The amount of television usage by children reached an eight-year high, with kids ages 2 to 5 watching the screen for more than 32 hours a week on average and those ages 6 to 11 watching more than 28 hours. The analysis, based on the fourth quarter of 2008, measured children's consumption of live and recorded TV, as well as VCR and game console usage.

    "They're using all the technology available in their households," said Patricia McDonough, Nielsen's senior vice president of insights, analysis and policy. "They're using the DVD, they're on the Internet. They're not giving up any media -- they're just picking up more."
     
    While this has obvious implications for the future of hunting and fishing, it also goes beyond that and straight to the core of our fundamental appreciation for nature itself. No one is born a hunter, an angler or a hiker. We all start life as a blank slate and what gets etched on that slate in our early childhood shapes who we will eventually become. You, I and everyone else who enjoys the outdoors, be they a hunter, an angler, a hiker, a birder or whatever, didn't get that way by mainlining 32 hours of high-definition methadone: we got that way by crawling around in the dirt catching bugs, climbing trees, building forts in the back yard and stomping around in creeks. You know, being kids. That childlike wonder, the curiosity, imagination and self-guided exploration of your surroundings. That's the base from which everything else rises. Lose that - as we most assuredly are - and you've lost an entire generation of children. And for what? So they can grow up to be the same mindless, self-absorbed zombie consumers their parents obviously are?
     
    Seriously, anyone who lets their small child watch 32 hours of television, video games and Internet a week should be smacked in the head with a rolled-up copy of Richard Louv's "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder."
     
    American parents, WTF are you thinking? Put down your go*****ed cellphone, get your fat a***s off Facebook, turn off the TV and pay some attention to your kids. Take them outside, let them get dirty. Let them think and explore for themselves without the help of corporate-sponsored storyline.
     
    Good gawd, didn't this used to be called common sense?

  • September 30, 2009

    Oklahoma Mining Company Claims Gold Deposit In Alaska’s Tongass National Forest

    From The Oklahoman:
    Jan Cannon. . ., a geologist who lives in Tecumseh, picked up some sand in southeast Alaska more than 30 years ago. . . . When he. . . went back . . . he found something better: a potentially massive cache of gold.

    His company, Oklahoma City-based Geohedral LLC, recently announced it had claimed more than 10,000 acres in the Tongass National Forest.

    "In our opinion, we have a ‘world class’ discovery,” Cannon said this week in a news release.

    The question is, what affect will getting that gold have on wildlife and its habitat?

    Be sure to check out the full article.

  • August 25, 2009

    Chad Love: Blogging for PETA

    I've been blogging for Field & Stream for a year now, and to be honest it's grown a little stale for me. It's a lot of work to come up with a topic, a news item or a link every day and then figure out some way to make it relevant, thought-provoking or funny for the F&S readership.
     
    You may not think so, but blogs are damn hard things to write and they often fail miserably. Sometimes the only reaction they get from you, the reader, is the sound of your mouse clicking to some other page. Other times you respond only to point out what an idiot you think I am. And you usually manage to misspell idiot in the process. More often than I care to admit I simply can't think of anything witty and I have to resort to that great suckhole of intelligence, Youtube. And let's face it, if you've seen one Youtube clip of some ignorant jack*ss and you've pretty much seen them all.
     
    Quite frankly, I'm tired of thinking, and I want a job that doesn't require it. And I think I've found one ...
     
    From the want ad on the PETA website:
    Position: PETA Blog Writer
    Position Objective: To write content for PETA's blog
    The PETA Files
    Term of Employment: Full-time
    Primary Responsibilities and Duties: Analyze and interpret public events and provide commentary via PETA's blog
    The PETA Files Write witty and unique blogs on topics ranging from PETA's naked demonstrations to regulatory testing on animals, dogfighting, and celebrities who support the cruel fur industry. Brainstorm daily content for PETA's blog with a small team. Monitor trends in blogs and assist with the implementation of new strategies for PETA's blog. Create and maintain relationships with other bloggers and pitch relevant content about PETA to them. Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor
     
    So long, folks. It was fun while it lasted. I've always wanted to know what color the sky was in their world, and now I'm finally going to get my chance.

Page 1 of 3123next ›last »