Lots of deer hunters—myself included—complain that they aren’t good at finding sheds. After two of my buddies contacted me this week with more shed-hunting success stories, I have come to a simple, yet profound, conclusion; we are just trying too hard. Want to really start knocking down sheds? Start searching for something else.
Minnesota is one of a growing number of states pondering management strategies that would increase antlerless harvest, as well as the number of mature bucks. While the Gopher State is a long way from implementing any specific regulations, some of the changes under consideration are Antler Point Restrictions (APR’s), moving firearms seasons out of the peak rut, and eliminating cross-tagging of bucks.
We’ve received two letters from readers this week. The first was from Steve Newcomb from Ohio, who reported seeing a buck with antlers in late March. These were hard-horn antlers from last year, and Steve wondered how unusual it was for a buck to still be packing that late in the year.
From the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel: Based on a DNR recommendation, the Natural Resources Board approved a 2009 deer hunting framework with a one-year moratorium on Earn-A-Buck regulations in most of the state.
Awhile back I posted the winner of the Wisconsin DNR/LaCrosse Tribune annual “ethical hunter” award. Click here if you missed it. Minnesota—which has a similar program—announced its winners recently. Minnesota’s program is co-sponsored by the DNR, the Turn In Poachers (TIP) program and the MN Deer Hunter’s Association (MDHA).
There's little support for a new strategy for trimming Wisconsin's deer herd. Hunters attending the annual statewide conservation hearings voted overwhelmingly Monday night against creating an [special] antlerless season. . . .
The plan is an alternative to earn-a-buck, which requires hunters to shoot an antlerless deer to qualify to kill a buck in areas where there's too many deer.