Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • November 17, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Do You Trust Your State Fish And Game Agency?

    From a Southwick Associates Press Release:
    In an October 2009 survey, Southwick Associates asked anglers and hunters which type of organization they trust the most for accurate information regarding fish and wildlife conservation. The results of the monthly AnglerSurvey.com and HunterSurvey.com poll show that state fish and wildlife agencies are considered the most trustworthy source of conservation information among hunters and anglers.

    Of the 2,771 anglers surveyed, 54.4 percent reported state fish and wildlife agencies were their most trusted source. Of the 3,378 hunters surveyed, 50.7 percent agreed.  The second most trusted source, with 25.1 percent of anglers and 29.5 percent of hunters, was sport-fishing and hunting non-profit conservation groups.

    Other options included federal agencies, outdoor television, and outdoor print media. Who do you trust most?

  • October 28, 2009

    Chad Love: The Zombie Plague

    Sometimes you read something that - to be perfectly honest - leaves you feeling hopeless and doomed. Something so depressing it makes you want to throw up your hands, shout "to hell with it all!" and head straight to the nearest bar. Something like this, from the LA Times.
     
    The latest figures from Nielsen have children's TV usage at an eight-year high. Children's health advocates warn of adverse effects.
     
    More than an entire day -- that's how long children sit in front of the television in an average week, according to new findings released Monday by Nielsen.

    The amount of television usage by children reached an eight-year high, with kids ages 2 to 5 watching the screen for more than 32 hours a week on average and those ages 6 to 11 watching more than 28 hours. The analysis, based on the fourth quarter of 2008, measured children's consumption of live and recorded TV, as well as VCR and game console usage.

    "They're using all the technology available in their households," said Patricia McDonough, Nielsen's senior vice president of insights, analysis and policy. "They're using the DVD, they're on the Internet. They're not giving up any media -- they're just picking up more."
     
    While this has obvious implications for the future of hunting and fishing, it also goes beyond that and straight to the core of our fundamental appreciation for nature itself. No one is born a hunter, an angler or a hiker. We all start life as a blank slate and what gets etched on that slate in our early childhood shapes who we will eventually become. You, I and everyone else who enjoys the outdoors, be they a hunter, an angler, a hiker, a birder or whatever, didn't get that way by mainlining 32 hours of high-definition methadone: we got that way by crawling around in the dirt catching bugs, climbing trees, building forts in the back yard and stomping around in creeks. You know, being kids. That childlike wonder, the curiosity, imagination and self-guided exploration of your surroundings. That's the base from which everything else rises. Lose that - as we most assuredly are - and you've lost an entire generation of children. And for what? So they can grow up to be the same mindless, self-absorbed zombie consumers their parents obviously are?
     
    Seriously, anyone who lets their small child watch 32 hours of television, video games and Internet a week should be smacked in the head with a rolled-up copy of Richard Louv's "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder."
     
    American parents, WTF are you thinking? Put down your go*****ed cellphone, get your fat a***s off Facebook, turn off the TV and pay some attention to your kids. Take them outside, let them get dirty. Let them think and explore for themselves without the help of corporate-sponsored storyline.
     
    Good gawd, didn't this used to be called common sense?

  • August 25, 2009

    Chad Love: Blogging for PETA

    I've been blogging for Field & Stream for a year now, and to be honest it's grown a little stale for me. It's a lot of work to come up with a topic, a news item or a link every day and then figure out some way to make it relevant, thought-provoking or funny for the F&S readership.
     
    You may not think so, but blogs are damn hard things to write and they often fail miserably. Sometimes the only reaction they get from you, the reader, is the sound of your mouse clicking to some other page. Other times you respond only to point out what an idiot you think I am. And you usually manage to misspell idiot in the process. More often than I care to admit I simply can't think of anything witty and I have to resort to that great suckhole of intelligence, Youtube. And let's face it, if you've seen one Youtube clip of some ignorant jack*ss and you've pretty much seen them all.
     
    Quite frankly, I'm tired of thinking, and I want a job that doesn't require it. And I think I've found one ...
     
    From the want ad on the PETA website:
    Position: PETA Blog Writer
    Position Objective: To write content for PETA's blog
    The PETA Files
    Term of Employment: Full-time
    Primary Responsibilities and Duties: Analyze and interpret public events and provide commentary via PETA's blog
    The PETA Files Write witty and unique blogs on topics ranging from PETA's naked demonstrations to regulatory testing on animals, dogfighting, and celebrities who support the cruel fur industry. Brainstorm daily content for PETA's blog with a small team. Monitor trends in blogs and assist with the implementation of new strategies for PETA's blog. Create and maintain relationships with other bloggers and pitch relevant content about PETA to them. Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor
     
    So long, folks. It was fun while it lasted. I've always wanted to know what color the sky was in their world, and now I'm finally going to get my chance.

  • August 24, 2009

    Forbes Lists North America’s Top Ten Trout Towns

    Including:

    West Yellowstone, Mont.
    Missoula, Mont.
    Roscoe, N.Y.
    State College, Pa.
    Grayling, Mich.
    Calgary, Alberta
    Glenwood Springs, Colo.
    Mountain Home, Ark.
    Redding, Calif.
    Asheville, N.C.

    Here's the full story.

  • July 31, 2009

    In Memory of William Tapply

    In my first couple years with F&S, I edited a handful of articles by Bill Tapply. I didn’t know him as the literary force he was. The English professor and author of more than 40 books, including two dozen mystery novels, never let on to any of that in our few phone conversations. His writing was clean and tight—not much to discuss there. So we talked grouse hunting and flyfishing. I didn’t think anything of it. Having no clue of his stature, I saw no reason why he shouldn’t speak to a perfectly green editor as a friend and an equal. And what I’ll remember best about Bill is that despite his stature, he saw no reason not to, either.

    Bill Tapply, long-time contributing editor with F&S, died Tuesday evening of luekemia. Those of us who worked with him will remember Bill as a pro’s pro, and I suspect anyone who knew him even a little will remember a kind and generous soul. We offer our condolences to the Tapply family.

    For more, read the obituary posted by our friends at midcurrent.com. --DH

  • July 24, 2009

    Trout Trump Rats for Cancer Research

    From The Oregonian:

    A rainbow trout can inspire and inform. It can lead a young fisherman to a life-long career studying human health. It can reveal the risks of carcinogens, and help develop treatments to prevent cancer. . . .

    George Bailey knows all this and has plenty of fish stories. As a professor, he spent three decades studying disease with trout in his aquatic laboratory at Oregon State University.

    It might seem odd that you can learn about people from trout, but in both animals, DBP [an environmental carcinogen] causes stomach and liver cancer by attacking and damaging DNA, tiny strings of molecules that contain cell-building information. People are good at repairing DNA, but trout have more difficulty. Like a canary in a coal mine, fish tend to get sick before people.

    Rats and mice are canaries, too[, but trout] have an inherently lower cancer rate. Only one in a thousand trout would get stomach cancer, compared with the rat rate of one in 20. That's why trout’s' cancer risk to DBP can be measured at low levels.

  • July 22, 2009

    Madison River Recovered From Whirling Disease

    From the Billings Gazette:

    Rainbow trout are rebounding in the Madison River, the world-class fishing stream where Montana's first known outbreak of whirling disease occurred about 15 years ago, devastating the rainbow fishery.

    In the 1990s, whirling disease slashed the rainbow trout population by 90 percent compared to levels measured in the 1960s and '70s.

    Now, after a succession of rebound years, rainbows under 10 inches have "pretty well recovered to pre-whirling levels" and the population of those larger is about 60 percent of what it was before the disease, said Dick Vincent, whirling-disease coordinator for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks until his retirement last winter.

     

  • July 21, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Dogs Can’t Fish (On Montana’s Smith River)

    Okay, now that we know some of you would stick your hand in an alligator’s mouth to save your dog (see yesterday’s Discussion Topic), here’s a simpler question: Do you take your dog fishing with you? Well, not any more if you fish Montana’s Smith River.

    From the Great Falls Tribune:

    Rover will have to stay home on next year's Smith River float.

    [Montana Fish, Wildlife, & Park released a new plan Monday that] restricts dogs on floats to hunting dogs during hunting season and to service dogs. . . .

    "The pet issue generated the most public comment," said Chas Van Genderen, FWP's Parks Division administrator. "We heard from people who view dogs as an important part of their Smith River float experience, and we heard from floaters who observed dogs running loose on private land to harass livestock and wildlife. Others shared concerns over barking dogs and dog excrement in boat camps."

    Your reaction?

     

  • July 8, 2009

    Gear Review: Coleman LED Quad Lantern

    I probably own about half a dozen Coleman lanterns – a couple of propane  and duel-fuel lights, but mostly those that run on Coleman fuel. My favorite is a lantern that my father used to have back in the 1950s. It’s in mint condition and it still works perfectly (though I had to replace the generator and O rings a couple of years ago).

    When I first saw the LED Quad, my first reaction was, why isn’t it green? That can’t be a Coleman lantern! Well, it’s red, it’s a Coleman, and it’s a totally new twist on camp lights.

    The deal with this is that it’s got a base that holds eight D-cell batteries.  Turn it on and it’s bright enough to light up the night – for 75 hours, according to the company. The cool thing is that the Quad has four lighting panels that can removed and used separately. Each has six 5mm white LEDS, for a total of 24 in the whole unit. A rechargeable NiMH battery runs each panel for half an hour it while it’s away from the mothership. Place it back in its docking station and it’ll recharge from the D batteries.

    I’m not giving up my old Colemans, but I can see where this lantern is going to fit right into the mix.  It’s bright, it’s quiet (doesn’t hiss like the gas models), and it’s versatile. The $69.99 msrp is a bit higher than most gas lanterns, but the price doesn’t seem unreasonable.  It’s available from www.coleman.com – Jay Cassell

  • June 10, 2009

    Gear Review: Ardent Reel Cleaning Kit

    I just got back from a soggy fishing trip in New York’s Catskill Mountains. Thanks to continuous and heavy rains, the Beaverkill was high and muddy. So were the East and West Branches of the Delaware. I did get in some trout fishing in the upper reaches of the Willowemoc, as that stream clears before other area streams, but that was about it.

    Once home, I did something I rarely do: I put all my flyreels on my workbench, took them apart, and cleaned and lubed them. On a roll, I also pulled out a couple of Shimano Symetre spinning reels, stripped them down, and cleaned and lubed them as well. 

    I point this out because, for the first time, I actually had an official reel cleaning kit. (In the past, I used anything I had lying around – usually an old toothbrush and some WD-40.) This kit has all you need: a Reel Kleen Degreaser, Reel Butter Oil and Grease, a brush and swabs, a combo Phillips/flathead screwdriver, and a silicone cloth, all in a snap-shut plastic case that could easily fit into a tacklebox. It’s a good idea – like having a Hoppe’s gun cleaning kit, for fishing. Cost is $19.95; ardentreels.com. If you go to their website, check out their casting reels. Good stuff and it’s made in the U.S.A. – Jay Cassell