Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • November 3, 2009

    Chad Love: Cut Down a Tree with a Ten-Dollar Knife

    So say you're stuck in the woods, the temperature's dropping fast and you need shelter and fire, quickly. There are trees all around but you have neither saw nor axe. All you have is your knife. It's not even a big Rambo-inspired, serrated-edge survival sword with a picatinny rail, but a twelve-dollar plastic-handled mora with a little four-inch blade. Hey, no problem.

    I admit, I'm a knife junkie just like the rest of you. Customs, semi-customs, high-end production models, even plain-jane knives speak to us with their seductive blend of form and function and we respond by purchasing them without regard to reason or budget.

    But in terms of absolute bang-for-buck, is there anything out there to compare to the lowly mora? These simple, inexpensive wonders aren't made of the latest super steel, they aren't a quarter-inch thick and there's nary a tactical, special ops-inspired doodad on them anywhere. They just work when you need them to. If you shop around you can find them for about the same price as a super-sized extra-value meal. And if you want to make your own, you can buy blade blanks for about the same money as your kid's happy-get-fatty meal.

    If there's a knife out there with a better price-to-performance ratio than that, I'd like to know what it is.

  • August 13, 2009

    Chad Love: Would You Wear Mantyhose?

    Pantyhose.  It's  one of those dark secrets real men just don't talk about.   But if you took x-ray glasses into half the duck blinds and deer  camps in this country you'd find more sexy stockings than you see at the  Moulin Rouge. Ultra-Sheer, nude, black, fishnet, lacy,   control-top, we've worn 'em all, skulking around the woods   worrying that our wives are gonna get really pi**ed if we get a  runner in  their L'eggs.
     
    But no longer.  Because the time has come for...Mantyhose.
     
    No,  seriously. It really has.      
     
    From the press  release:
    Hunters  Turn to Mantyhose for Relief From  the Elements: GRANVILLE/OHIO, USA – July  28, 2009 — When fall is  in the air and hunters take to the woods,  temperatures also begin  to drop. By the time deer season rolls around, it  can get bitter  cold after all those hours in a treestand. If you’re like  many,  you’ve worn your long johns under your Carhartts® in an effort to fend   off the chill. The trouble is, they can feel pretty bulky under  the rest of  your clothes—not to mention the trouble with clothing  containing cotton  fiber...So what’s a guy to do?...An Ohio-based  company has a solution to  allow all of us to keep warm and still  retain the title of manly-man.  ACTIVSKIN® sells opaque and sheer  tights designed specifically for men.  Their legwear is tailored to  male body proportions, including a fly opening  to eliminate any  question of this being a truly masculine alternative.  

    The company even has a blog at http://www.nylongene.com/. To be  honest  I don't know which is more disturbing: the fact there's a  blog out there covering (so to speak) men's pantyhose, or that it's already attracted 58 followers.
     
    OK, so now that the issue's out of the undie drawer,  the question is: if it's  specifically marketed toward men, does that make it manly enough  to wear without shame? Would you wear it, and more importantly, would you admit you're wearing  it?
     
    Who knows, but here's some marketing advice for the company: if you want men to feel  comfortable and manly in your tights, then lose the models built like ballarinas and go find some hairy legs and beer bellies...  

  • July 8, 2009

    Gear Review: Coleman LED Quad Lantern

    I probably own about half a dozen Coleman lanterns – a couple of propane  and duel-fuel lights, but mostly those that run on Coleman fuel. My favorite is a lantern that my father used to have back in the 1950s. It’s in mint condition and it still works perfectly (though I had to replace the generator and O rings a couple of years ago).

    When I first saw the LED Quad, my first reaction was, why isn’t it green? That can’t be a Coleman lantern! Well, it’s red, it’s a Coleman, and it’s a totally new twist on camp lights.

    The deal with this is that it’s got a base that holds eight D-cell batteries.  Turn it on and it’s bright enough to light up the night – for 75 hours, according to the company. The cool thing is that the Quad has four lighting panels that can removed and used separately. Each has six 5mm white LEDS, for a total of 24 in the whole unit. A rechargeable NiMH battery runs each panel for half an hour it while it’s away from the mothership. Place it back in its docking station and it’ll recharge from the D batteries.

    I’m not giving up my old Colemans, but I can see where this lantern is going to fit right into the mix.  It’s bright, it’s quiet (doesn’t hiss like the gas models), and it’s versatile. The $69.99 msrp is a bit higher than most gas lanterns, but the price doesn’t seem unreasonable.  It’s available from www.coleman.com – Jay Cassell

  • June 24, 2009

    Gear Review: Knight & Hale Pack Rack

    If you’re like me, you probably get pretty tired of lugging sets of real or synthetic antlers into the woods so you can hopefully rattle in a buck. Rattling antlers not only take up too much space in your hunting pack, but they also tend to clack and clank together as you walk, alerting any self-respecting buck in the area that something isn’t right.

    So, I got one of these Pack Racks in the mail from Knight & Hale the other day. At first glance, I was thinking, Yeah right, this will work. But you know what? It does. I haven’t tried it in deer season yet, but this thing sounds incredibly realistic. All it is, is two pieces of plastic, different consistencies, tethered together with a piece of rope. It carries as one unit, so it’s silent (and compact) in your pack. And when you want to use it, simply pull the two pieces apart, flip them around, and start turning them in different directions. You can change the tone with more or less pressure, and it really does sound like two bucks fighting. $24.95. www/knightandhale.com - Jay Cassell

  • June 10, 2009

    Gear Review: Ardent Reel Cleaning Kit

    I just got back from a soggy fishing trip in New York’s Catskill Mountains. Thanks to continuous and heavy rains, the Beaverkill was high and muddy. So were the East and West Branches of the Delaware. I did get in some trout fishing in the upper reaches of the Willowemoc, as that stream clears before other area streams, but that was about it.

    Once home, I did something I rarely do: I put all my flyreels on my workbench, took them apart, and cleaned and lubed them. On a roll, I also pulled out a couple of Shimano Symetre spinning reels, stripped them down, and cleaned and lubed them as well. 

    I point this out because, for the first time, I actually had an official reel cleaning kit. (In the past, I used anything I had lying around – usually an old toothbrush and some WD-40.) This kit has all you need: a Reel Kleen Degreaser, Reel Butter Oil and Grease, a brush and swabs, a combo Phillips/flathead screwdriver, and a silicone cloth, all in a snap-shut plastic case that could easily fit into a tacklebox. It’s a good idea – like having a Hoppe’s gun cleaning kit, for fishing. Cost is $19.95; ardentreels.com. If you go to their website, check out their casting reels. Good stuff and it’s made in the U.S.A. – Jay Cassell

  • May 20, 2009

    Gear Review: A New Two-Way Radio for Hunters

    I recently had the chance to check out Motorola’s newest Talkabout two-way radio.  I’ve always been skeptical about the claims made by all walkie-talkie makers…”50 Miles Capability”…stuff like that. Then I take them up to my hunting camp in New York’s Catskill Mountains and they won’t reach a buddy who’s a mile away. These things work when you’re on flat ground, but in heavily forested, rolling mountains and hills? Nah.

    So, when I took out the new Talkabout (Model MR355R – catchy, huh?) and tried calling my turkey hunting buddy Bill, who had walked out of the cabin five minutes earlier, I got no response. So much for this unit, I thought. But then I remembered that the new model has a Power Boost button. I pressed it, and damn! There was Bill on the other end, telling me he wasn’t hearing any turkeys. The company claims it has a 35-mile range, and while I didn’t try to contact Bill 35 miles away, I will say it is definitely more powerful than its predecessor.

    Another feature I like is the 11 weather channels, including 7 from NOAA. (It said it was going to rain on the second day of my recent turkey hunt, and they sure got that right.)

    The new Talkabout has an emergency alert feature, 22 channels plus 8 repeater channels; a vibrating alert; 10 call tones (now you can sound like a duck), large buttons for use with gloves, plus an LED light. The unit comes in Realtree AP HD camo – which is fine, except I dropped mine in the woods and couldn’t find it. That’s the second walkie-talkie I’ve lost in six months. The units come with a belt clip, but maybe some kind of Cordura pouch with a magnetic closure wouldn’t be a bad idea.

    The suggested retail price is $89.99 for two units, charger, belt clips and ear buds; not bad at all. motorola.com – Jay Cassell

  • May 14, 2009

    Gear Review: Gregory z35 Daypack

    I get to test a lot of different backpacks in my job, and one of my favorite pack-making companies has always been Gregory.  They’ve been in business for 30 years, and always seem to be at the head of the pack (pun intended) with innovative new models. Check them out at gregorypacks.com – they have packs you can use in just about any situation.

    The last couple of weeks I’ve been checking out their Z35 – it is very comfortable, with what they call an “Auto-Fit” harness system, which is padded and has a mesh surface to wick away moisture. The suspension system, also with mesh to wick away moisture, does a good distributing the load. The pack has a huge main compartment, with a divider; it’s accessible from the top or the front, via a handy zipper; a large front pocket; some mesh pockets on the waist belt; compression pockets on each side; plus it’s got a waterproof cover.  The pack I’m using has a capacity of 2320 cubic inches, though there is a smaller one in the line that holds 2074 cubic inches.
     
    This thing is a steal at $150. My only question, and I had the same complaint on the last item I reviewed, is why doesn’t Gregory have any camo packs in their line? I would definitely take this hunting if it were camo.  Since it isn’t, I limit it to day hikes. Come, on Gregory, let’s wake up on this one. – Jay Cassell

  • May 6, 2009

    Gear Review: The Gerber Crucial

    Editors Note: Hunting and fishing equipment manufacturers are always sending our gear editor, Jay Cassell, their latest gadgets to test on his trips. We figured you'd enjoy reading regular reviews of this stuff, so here's his first.

    I got a gobbler up at my cabin in the Catskills last Sunday (May 3). After taking some photos I went to work on gutting and plucking the bird.

    When I take apart a turkey, I always saw off the legs first; and, guess what? I didn’t have my saw. But what I did have was Gerber’s new multi-plier, called the Crucial Tool. The blade is sharp and better, half of it is serrated – perfect for cutting bone. Some sawing here, a bit of hacking there, and legs were off. After that came the neck. I used the fine edge of the blade to trim and cut.

    A good tool. It’s small, folds up neatly, and has pliers, wire-cutters, a flat head screwdriver, a Phillips head screwdriver, a bottle opener, and a caribiner. It’s 5 1/2 inches long, less that 4 inches when closed. It comes in a black belt case; too bad it isn’t camo.

    The Crucial will be available in stores July 1, for $50. Gerbergear.com – Jay C

  • May 1, 2009

    Leaked: A Memo from Our Publisher

    Sent to the F&S editorial team this morning, from Publisher Eric Zinczenko.

    Dear staff,
    Last night was an important milestone in our magazine’s 114 year history.  Shortly after 9pm, the announcement rang through the Rose Hall at Lincoln Center that Field & Stream took top honors winning General Excellence for 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 circulation magazines at the National Magazine Awards.

    This is an extraordinary accomplishment.  After an impressive streak of 11 nominations, our Field & Stream editorial staff finally won their first “Ellie.”  Competing against the other nominees, The New Yorker, Vogue, Bon Appétit and Popular Science in the most contested category of the night was not an easy feat and when you consider the other titles eligible for the category (Men’s Health, Sports Illustrated, Vanity Fair, Golf Digest, Gourmet, etc.) it should help put this monumental achievement in perspective.

    Winning such an honor for editorial excellence, consistency and as ASME states “for which writing, reporting, editing and design all come together to fulfill the magazine’s editorial mission” during a time when other titles within our space are compromising on quality makes this achievement even more meaningful.

    Please join me in congratulating Anthony [Licata], who in his first full year as editor, wins the highest award in his craft and to the rest of his editorial group for making their mark on our brand’s storied history.  Regardless of department or title, we should all feel proud at this moment to be a part of something so special here at Bonnier and our Outdoor Group.  Last night wasn’t only a vote for Field & Stream, but for the great American heritage of hunting and fishing and to sportsmen everywhere.

  • April 13, 2009

    Chad Love: Why Do High-End Fly Reels Cost So Much?

    John Merwin's last blog post was both revelation and relief for me.

    Revelation because you simply don't expect the fishing editor of Field & Stream to tell you he uses and enjoys $39 fly reels. Relief because I've been shopping around for a new reel to put on a custom five-weight rod and it seems to answer a question that's been bugging me throughout the entire process, which is: why the hell are high-end fly reels so damn expensive and do I really need one?
     
    Case in point: On the left we have a used Sage 3200, discontinued but still bringing a couple hundred bucks on the used market. On the right, an ordinary current-production Calcutta 200B that retails for around $199. The Calcutta is mine. The Sage I stole from my brother because I own zero nice fly reels, all mine having been purchased from pawn shops for about the same price as a McDonalds Happy Meal.
     
    Take apart the Calcutta and you'll find gears, ball bearings and lots and lots of forged, machined and intricately-connected parts. Take apart the Sage and you'll find, well, not a whole lot. Now I realize the Sage is a click-pawl reel and as such doesn't have a drag but I've looked at a lot of drag-equipped reels in the $150 to $300 range and I have to admit I just can't see why they cost so much. And don't get me wrong: this isn't about bass vs. trout equipment or elite vs. Bubba attitudes. The same argument could very easily be made about baitcasters because in terms of pure functionality there isn't a helluva lot of difference between a $69 Ambassadeur C3, a $200 Calcutta or a $450 Conquest. But from a manufacturing, materials and machining standpoint I can at least see where the price increases come from.

    Not so with fly reels, at least to my eyes.
     
    Does my lack of sophistication simply blind me to what high-end fly reels bring to the experience? Are they simply that much harder to make than a baitcaster? It's an honest question because I'm wavering here on my impending reel choice. On one hand I'm a degenerate high-end tackle junkie who would love to pair up my new rod with an equally classy reel. On the other hand I am chronically impoverished, so if John Merwin says a $39 reel will get the job done admirably and won't get me laughed off the river (I'll let my casting do that) then I find it awfully hard to break out the piggy bank.

    Any thoughts?

Page 1 of 212next ›last »