Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • November 3, 2009

    New Concealed-Carry Permit Numbers Double in South Carolina

    From The State:
    So far in 2009, the number of South Carolinians wanting to pack heat nearly has doubled over the previous year as people worry about violent crime and feel threatened by partisan politics.

    As of mid-October, 28,197 new concealed weapons permits have been issued this year by South Carolina's State Law Enforcement Division.

    It's an annual record that already has surpassed the 14,630 new permits issued in all of 2008 and by far outstrips all previous years, according to SLED statistics.

  • October 28, 2009

    Chad Love: The Zombie Plague

    Sometimes you read something that - to be perfectly honest - leaves you feeling hopeless and doomed. Something so depressing it makes you want to throw up your hands, shout "to hell with it all!" and head straight to the nearest bar. Something like this, from the LA Times.
     
    The latest figures from Nielsen have children's TV usage at an eight-year high. Children's health advocates warn of adverse effects.
     
    More than an entire day -- that's how long children sit in front of the television in an average week, according to new findings released Monday by Nielsen.

    The amount of television usage by children reached an eight-year high, with kids ages 2 to 5 watching the screen for more than 32 hours a week on average and those ages 6 to 11 watching more than 28 hours. The analysis, based on the fourth quarter of 2008, measured children's consumption of live and recorded TV, as well as VCR and game console usage.

    "They're using all the technology available in their households," said Patricia McDonough, Nielsen's senior vice president of insights, analysis and policy. "They're using the DVD, they're on the Internet. They're not giving up any media -- they're just picking up more."
     
    While this has obvious implications for the future of hunting and fishing, it also goes beyond that and straight to the core of our fundamental appreciation for nature itself. No one is born a hunter, an angler or a hiker. We all start life as a blank slate and what gets etched on that slate in our early childhood shapes who we will eventually become. You, I and everyone else who enjoys the outdoors, be they a hunter, an angler, a hiker, a birder or whatever, didn't get that way by mainlining 32 hours of high-definition methadone: we got that way by crawling around in the dirt catching bugs, climbing trees, building forts in the back yard and stomping around in creeks. You know, being kids. That childlike wonder, the curiosity, imagination and self-guided exploration of your surroundings. That's the base from which everything else rises. Lose that - as we most assuredly are - and you've lost an entire generation of children. And for what? So they can grow up to be the same mindless, self-absorbed zombie consumers their parents obviously are?
     
    Seriously, anyone who lets their small child watch 32 hours of television, video games and Internet a week should be smacked in the head with a rolled-up copy of Richard Louv's "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder."
     
    American parents, WTF are you thinking? Put down your go*****ed cellphone, get your fat a***s off Facebook, turn off the TV and pay some attention to your kids. Take them outside, let them get dirty. Let them think and explore for themselves without the help of corporate-sponsored storyline.
     
    Good gawd, didn't this used to be called common sense?

  • October 28, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Is Your Next Deer Rifle An AR?

    It is for a growing number of hunters. Ironically, ever since Jim Zumbo infamously blogged that black guns have no place in hunting, their popularity among hunters has surged.

    From the Twin Cities’ Pioneer Press:

    "Last fall, we couldn't keep these rifles in stock," said [Joe’s Sporting Goods gunsmith Bob] Everson. . . ..

    Whether Zumbo was treated fairly or not for his opinion is still debated, but what isn't disputed is the popularity of AR rifles. Big-name rifle makers like Remington and Ruger have jumped into the game of making AR rifles (named after the Armalite company that first developed them in the 1950s). . . .

    Jim Rauscher, president of Joe's Sporting Goods, said bolt-action rifles are still the most popular style among his deer-hunting customers. But AR rifles appeal to certain segment of hunters. . . .

    "There is the guy who still likes the four-door sedan," Rauscher said, "and there are the guys who like the large, jacked-up pickup trucks."

    So how about you? Can you see yourself hunting deer with an AR?

  • October 27, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Oklahoma Man Shot In Poaching Accident

    Criminal charges are often not filed hunting accidents, but what if the people involved were not so much hunting as poaching? Should that make a difference?

    From The Oklahoman:

    John A Morgan, 44, was shot and killed by Jack Zearley, 69, while they were hunting deer. . .

    [Sheriff Israel] Beauchamp said while the Saturday shooting appears to have been accidental, the two Hartshorne men were hunting illegally when Zearley fired a high-powered rifle at a deer that was between the two men. The shot struck Morgan. . . .

    Because the accident involved a high-powered rifle [during an archery- and muzzleloader-only season], the men weren’t wearing hunter orange safety clothing and neither man had a hunting license, the incident could result in criminal charges once the information is presented to the district attorney, he said.

    Check out the full story and tell us your reaction.

  • October 26, 2009

    Discussion Topic: UNC-Chapel Hill Shoots Down Old-Well Rifle Engraving

    From the News & Observer:

    The Old Well, a campus landmark and symbol of UNC-Chapel Hill, appears on neckties, jewelry and other products, but a Colorado company's plans to put it on the stock of a rifle has raised concerns.

    Historical Armory, a small company based in Fort Collins, Colo., is advertising a "Historic Orange County" special edition of a .22-caliber rifle. The stock is engraved with images, including the state flag, the American flag, the Confederate flag, a deer, a cannon and the Old Well.

    Carrboro Mayor Mark Chilton, a 1993 UNC-CH graduate, said placing a university symbol on a gun is not appropriate, especially in light of cases of violence on or near college campuses around the country. Chilton was living in Chapel Hill when law student Wendell Williamson shot and killed two people and injured two others in 1995.

    "It sends the wrong message to the public to see university symbols used in that way," said Chilton. . . .

    What do you say?

     

  • October 23, 2009

    GunBroker.com Fights Breast Cancer With Pink Rifle Auction

    From a company press release:

    In support of the fight against breast cancer, GunBroker.com® is hosting a charity auction of . . . a pink AR-15 style DPMS Panther Lite rifle was donated by DPMS Panther Arms.

    All funds from the auction will go to the Atlanta Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk, to be held Oct. 23-25.  The GunBroker.com Family Team will participate in the walk, which benefits Susan G. Komen for the Cure and National Philanthropic Trust.

    Click here for details and to bid on the rifle.

  • October 22, 2009

    Gallup Poll: Will Obama Ban Try To Ban The Sale of Handguns?

    Quick, guess. Don’t skim down. How many Americans polled said yes? How many American gun owners?

    Okay, here are the results, from gallup.com:

    A new Gallup poll may explain recent reports of increased gun and ammunition sales in the U.S. Majorities of those who personally own a gun (55%) and of those with a gun in the household (53%), as well as 41% of all Americans, believe that President Obama "will attempt to ban the sale of guns in the United States while he is president."

    Were you close? Check out the full article and tell us your reaction.

  • October 21, 2009

    Chad Love: Own Your Own Whale Gun

    Do you constantly fret over the adequacy of your gun collection? Are you worried there's a gaping hole in your hunting arsenal? Do you have guns for small game, upland birds, waterfowl, turkeys, predators, deer, elk, moose, bear, dangerous game, plains game, and pretty much anything else that walks, crawls or flies, but you still think there's something missing for the really, really big game?
     
    Well, fret no more, because for the low starting bid of $19,950 you can complete your ultimate hunting battery with this, the Kongberg 90mm Harpoon Cannon, complete with everything you see here (crusty Norwegian whaler dudes sold separately).

     
    Yes, that really is a genuine deck-mounted harpoon gun offered for sale on Gunbroker.com. And yes, if you really wanted it and had the coin to buy it and have it shipped to the states it could be yours. The question is, what the hell would you do with it? Is it the ultimate bowfishing rig? Could you bolt it to the bed of your truck to scare off annoying tailgaters? Lawn darts? Or is this the ultimate post-apocalyptic weapon for protecting your home?
     
    What would you do with this thing? Click through this gallery of more photos of the harpoon gun for inspiration, then give us your best and most creative answer. Bonus points awarded for those that are written in a fake Norwegian accent, make some reference to Moby Dick, or include the term "thar she blows!"  
     
    Unless I get lucky and draw for, say, a humpback tag, I believe I'd simply mount the thing in my front yard to deter vacuum cleaner salesmen.

  • October 21, 2009

    Discussion Topic Update: Student Fights Suspension Over Knife

    From AOL News:

    An upstate New York high school senior suspended for 20 days because of a two-inch knife is fighting back.

    Matthew Whalen's family has retained a lawyer to appeal the suspension and clear his record. Lansingburgh Central School District Superintendent George Goodwin punished Whalen for having the small utility knife in a tool kit that was locked in the teen's car. Goodwin ruled it was a weapon that is forbidden on school property under Lansingburgh's "zero-tolerance" policy on weapons. . . .

    So far, school officials have refused to back down and won't comment on the controversy, which has attracted national news media attention. The school board might discuss the matter at its Oct. 27 meeting. The Whalens threatened to sue unless the board reverses the superintendent's decision, Fox News reported.

     

  • October 20, 2009

    Chad Love: Hunters and Anglers Don’t Get Conservation Credit

    No one knows better than hunters and anglers the frustration of getting zero credit or recognition for their contributions to conservation efforts. We're used to being ignored by the media, the general public and most politicians.
     
    But now it seems we're also being ignored by scientists. Here's a story that summarizes a recent study on the demographics of those most and least likely to financially support conservation.
     
    From the story:
     
    Serious hikers and backpackers tend to become supporters of environmental and conservation groups while casual woodland tourists do not, a new study says...The researchers found that the amount of time one spent hiking or backpacking in nature correlated with a willingness, 11 to 12 years later, to financially support any of four representative conservation organizations: the Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, the Sierra Club or Environmental Defense."
     
    And here's the kicker...
     
    "Surprisingly, the more time one spent fishing or sightseeing in natural areas, the less likely that person was to support these particular conservation causes. "Apparently not all outdoor recreation is equal in terms of who is going to be an investor in conservation," (study co-author) Zaradic said."

     
    Now first off, I'm not going to deride any of the organizations mentioned in the story. They're all good organizations that do good work. But they are hardly a true representative cross-section of the environmental/conservation movement. There are literally hundreds of national, state and local organizations that are out there doing the same thing as the four groups mentioned, and often doing it more effectively. And when you factor in all the hunting and fishing/based organizations that do conservation work you have a huge pool of potential venues in which to donate time or money.
     
    So right off the bat the study's tiny sample size is going to skew the results. But what's truly amazing to me is the sweeping generalization that "the more time one spent fishing...the less likely that person was to support these particular conservation causes."
     
    That statement is so painfully obvious it deserves a huge "well, no s**t!"
     
     Seriously, why would an angler - you know, a person who enjoys and cares about fishing - give money to the Nature Conservancy or the World Wildlife Fund and watch his donation go overseas to purchase a nature preserve or do conservation work in some other country when he can give the same money to, say, Trout Unlimited, and see that money put to work here?
     
    And of course the study fails to mention the economic and conservation impact of the billions collected through Pittman-Robertson and Wallop-Breaux. Yes, it's true that way too many hunters and angler use Pittman-Robertson and Wallop-Breaux as a crutch and an excuse for their political apathy and inaction. Paying a few cents tax on your jerkbaits and bullets does not automatically make you a conservationist and doesn't give you a free pass to do absolutely nothing, but I often wonder if the authors of these kinds of studies are even aware of the financial contributions sportsmen make to conservation.
     
    So when the study's co-author states "apparently not all outdoor recreation is equal in terms of who is going to be an investor in conservation" I guess it's true: some of us are investing a helluva lot more.

Page 1 of 12123456789next ›last »