Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • November 3, 2009

    New Concealed-Carry Permit Numbers Double in South Carolina

    From The State:
    So far in 2009, the number of South Carolinians wanting to pack heat nearly has doubled over the previous year as people worry about violent crime and feel threatened by partisan politics.

    As of mid-October, 28,197 new concealed weapons permits have been issued this year by South Carolina's State Law Enforcement Division.

    It's an annual record that already has surpassed the 14,630 new permits issued in all of 2008 and by far outstrips all previous years, according to SLED statistics.

  • October 28, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Is Your Next Deer Rifle An AR?

    It is for a growing number of hunters. Ironically, ever since Jim Zumbo infamously blogged that black guns have no place in hunting, their popularity among hunters has surged.

    From the Twin Cities’ Pioneer Press:

    "Last fall, we couldn't keep these rifles in stock," said [Joe’s Sporting Goods gunsmith Bob] Everson. . . ..

    Whether Zumbo was treated fairly or not for his opinion is still debated, but what isn't disputed is the popularity of AR rifles. Big-name rifle makers like Remington and Ruger have jumped into the game of making AR rifles (named after the Armalite company that first developed them in the 1950s). . . .

    Jim Rauscher, president of Joe's Sporting Goods, said bolt-action rifles are still the most popular style among his deer-hunting customers. But AR rifles appeal to certain segment of hunters. . . .

    "There is the guy who still likes the four-door sedan," Rauscher said, "and there are the guys who like the large, jacked-up pickup trucks."

    So how about you? Can you see yourself hunting deer with an AR?

  • October 23, 2009

    GunBroker.com Fights Breast Cancer With Pink Rifle Auction

    From a company press release:

    In support of the fight against breast cancer, GunBroker.com® is hosting a charity auction of . . . a pink AR-15 style DPMS Panther Lite rifle was donated by DPMS Panther Arms.

    All funds from the auction will go to the Atlanta Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk, to be held Oct. 23-25.  The GunBroker.com Family Team will participate in the walk, which benefits Susan G. Komen for the Cure and National Philanthropic Trust.

    Click here for details and to bid on the rifle.

  • October 1, 2009

    Chad Love: Buy a Diamond, Get a Rifle

    Sometimes you come across an idea so profoundly brilliant there's really not much more you can say about it than "wow, that's brilliant."

     
    Take this ad, for example. It's from my hometown newspaper (and my very first job as a writer), The Norman (Okla.) Transcript.
     
    It's so simple. So devious. So genius. Buy earrings for her. Be the romantic hero. Bask in the warm glow of her unadulterated love. Slip the rifle into the safe when she's over showing off the earrings to your mother-in-law, you know, the same mother-in-law who warned her daughter she should find a nice dentist instead of marrying you, the shiftless, unrepentant gun nut.
     
    See? Brilliant. Everyone's a winner. The wife's happy (if none the wiser), you've got a new rifle and for once the mother-in-law is left speechless.
     
    But here's my question: Would you tell her? Would not telling her about the gun be dishonest, or merely an insignificant detail you just sort of, uhh...you know...failed to mention?

  • October 1, 2009

    Discussion Topic: Second-Amendment Showdown, Part II

    In case you were living under a rock last year, in the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to own a gun for private use, thus striking down the district’s handgun ban. But D.C. is a federal enclave. The question of whether the amendment protects a broad constitutional right and should therefore override state and local gun-control ordinances, such as Chicago’s handgun ban, is still up in the air—but not for long.

    From the Los Angeles Times:
    The Supreme Court set the stage for a historic ruling on gun rights and the 2nd Amendment by agreeing today to hear a challenge to Chicago's ban on handguns. . . .

    A ruling on the issue, due by next summer, could open the door to legal challenges to various gun control measures in cities and states across the nation. . . .

    Lawyers for the gun owners argued that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" set out in the 2nd Amendment is "incorporated" into the 14th Amendment and thereby applies to states and localities.

    Be sure to check out the full article, and then tell us your reaction.

  • September 29, 2009

    Senators Take Aim At Park Service Lead Ban

    From a National Shooting Sports Foundation press release via PR Newswire:
    A letter signed by [13 Republican] United States senators to Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar raising important questions about actions by the National Park Service (NPS) to ban the use of traditional ammunition in parks that allow hunting has drawn praise from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry.

    In concluding their letter to Secretary Salazar, the senators were very clear as to what they wanted to see: "We request that NPS cease all actions to prohibit the use of lead products on NPS lands by private citizens and NPS personnel."

    Check out the full release.

  • September 10, 2009

    Chad Love: Toy Guns Don’t Make Kids Killers

    It's always refreshing to see a  person reject "liberal" versus "conservative" politics in favor of  non-partisan rationality, and a good example of this can be found in this essay on the "liberal"-leaning news site Salon.
     
    From the story:
     
    I was a violent kid. More than anything, I loved to  play war. In my basement, I built a sandbag foxhole out of stacked-up sofa  pillows. I would hide inside and peer out at what I imagined were the smoking slopes of Iwo Jima, crawling with Japanese soldiers ready to fight to the death.

    My parents were liberal. More than liberal: Unitarians. We had a National Organization for Women poster hanging in our kitchen. A family friend stayed with us at the house while going through a sex change. My dad was, and probably still is, an advocate of the most  draconian gun control proposals ever drafted, or even pondered. I'm sure both my parents voted for Carter, probably Dukakis, too. I remember a lot of family skinny dipping. Hell, my parents wouldn't even let me play on a football team.

    Our family stood in sharp contrast to the countless Americans who grow up not only with toy guns, but also with real  guns, as a routine part of life. Guns were anathema to my parents. Period. Guns were bad. That included toy guns.

    Fast-forward 30 years, and now I am the proud parent of two children. Lovely wife. Cute brick row house. A waggly tailed, big old yellow dog. I either did something right or got really lucky, or both. Like many young parents, I've learned that  despite all my whining about my Unitarian parents, I'll be lucky to be half as patient, evenhanded, thoughtful and engaged with my kids as my folks were  with me, even during my lengthy jackass stage.

    That does not mean, however, that I have to do everything exactly the way they did. Now, I have a son. He is just turning 4. And I have decided to arm him to the teeth.

    As the father of a well-adjusted and completely normal  child who also happens to think R. Lee Ermey's "Lock N Load" is the coolest show on television and who recently informed his  parents that he wants to be a "gun expert" when he grows up, I  commend  the "liberal" author's rejection of the ridiculous notion that toy guns somehow turn kids into killers. It shows that maybe, just maybe, common  sense is more powerful than political ideology.

  • September 4, 2009

    Special Report: Regular F&S.com Poster Takes Wolf in Idaho

    A special guest post by Thomas McIntyre

    Familiar to readers of fieldandstream.com is regular poster Robert Millage, better known as “idahooutdoors.” Now, it seems, Millage is getting known by everyone in the country with an interest in wolves.


    Click here or on the image to see more photos

    Tuesday, the 1st of September was the opening of Idaho’s controversial wolf-hunting season. Millage, a fifth generation, 34-year-old Idahoan from Kamiah—who is a dedicated outdoorsman when he’s not a realtor with Idaho Land and Home or guiding hunters for Selway Ridgerunner Outfitters—has seen the explosion of wolves in his state, and the (coincidental or not) steep decline in elk numbers. All of which made him look forward to the chance to take one of Idaho’s big game quota of 220 wolves.

    On the night of August 31st, Millage was in the north-central Idaho mountains between Units 10 and 12 in the Lolo hunting zone, about halfway between Kamiah and Missoula, Montana, scouting for wolves. He was scouting them the way he does elk, going to the tops of drainages and listening for their calls, until he located the howls of a pack below. Then he raised his camp and got ready to hunt in the morning.

    At 3:00 a.m., Millage was set up behind a log on a rockslide, on an opening above the edge of the timber. He had a Tikka T3 topped with a Burris Diamond scope. He was shooting a .243 Winchester loaded with 100 grain Remington Core-Lokts. As he waited for shooting light, it was like some vampire movie as he heard wolves howling all around him; and he took comfort in the.357 on his hip, even though it wasn’t loaded with silver bullets.

    When light broke, Millage began making a coyote distress call—wolves hating coyotes even more than they love elk. And in twenty minutes, a long and lanky 80 pound gray wolf with black hackles stepped out of the timber below, looking for the source of the calling.

    As Millage held the wolf in his crosshairs, it may have winded him because it turned and trotted back toward the timber. Figuring it was now or never, Millage let off the safety and fired. The bullet took the wolf behind the shoulder and it flipped over and lay dead. If this wasn’t the first big-game hunter-taken wolf in Idaho, or in the entire Northern Rockies in the US, it was damn close.

    By four that afternoon, Millage was in Lewiston, checking the wolf in with Idaho Fish and Game; and “excited” barely describes the reception he received there. Because of the 90 degree temperatures, Millage had the wolf tucked up on the front floorboard on the passenger side of his SUV, the A/C cranked up to max to make sure the hair didn’t slip. And within minutes he had an estimated 15 to 20 fish and game employees crowding eagerly around, all wanting a look.

    When the media were alerted, Millage became a celebrity and a villain. As of this writing, his name and “wolf” on Google pulls up 277,000 results. Initially, the e-mails and calls he received, from people identifying themselves as members of groups such as Defenders of Wildlife, were overwhelmingly negative, if not downright nasty. But Millage kept his cool and remained polite. Now there’s been an upwelling of support from other hunters around the country who understand the necessity of managing an apex predator like the wolf, and that states such as Idaho are capable of carrying out the job, as they have done successfully with cougars, black bears, and grizzlies.

    Presently, only a handful of wolves have been taken in Idaho, probably because hunters are waiting to see how the season goes, or does not go. A lawsuit—brought by the Bozeman-based law firm EarthJustice, representing a coalition of 13 “conservation” groups—to return the wolf to federal regulation under the Endangered Species Act, and to halt the Idaho hunts as well as those planned for Montana later this month, is now before US District Judge Don Molloy in Missoula, Montana; and a decision is expected sometime next week.

    Millage has his wolf, though, and ranks it with his other lifetime trophies, including a 182 mule deer he took. He would like to have the wolf made into a full body mount so his boys, ages three and four, will have it to enjoy as they grow up. So if there’s any good taxidermist out there who might like to volunteer his services, Millage would be pleased to hear from you.

    Click here or on the image above to see more photos.

  • July 31, 2009

    In Memory of William Tapply

    In my first couple years with F&S, I edited a handful of articles by Bill Tapply. I didn’t know him as the literary force he was. The English professor and author of more than 40 books, including two dozen mystery novels, never let on to any of that in our few phone conversations. His writing was clean and tight—not much to discuss there. So we talked grouse hunting and flyfishing. I didn’t think anything of it. Having no clue of his stature, I saw no reason why he shouldn’t speak to a perfectly green editor as a friend and an equal. And what I’ll remember best about Bill is that despite his stature, he saw no reason not to, either.

    Bill Tapply, long-time contributing editor with F&S, died Tuesday evening of luekemia. Those of us who worked with him will remember Bill as a pro’s pro, and I suspect anyone who knew him even a little will remember a kind and generous soul. We offer our condolences to the Tapply family.

    For more, read the obituary posted by our friends at midcurrent.com. --DH

  • July 23, 2009

    Chad Love: PayPal Hates Guns?

    Several months ago when I professed my unrequited love for fine English shotguns,   longtime author, falconer and double gun aficionado Steve Bodio suggested I check out the website of British shooting journalist and shotgun broker Diggory Hadoke.  
     
    It's a good resource for keeping up with the current state of the British shotgun market, and despite the fact I can't afford a British shooting jacket, much less a shotgun, I try to peruse the site on a semi-regular basis just for the escapism factor. Some guys have porn, others have gambling or drugs. I have unattainable shotguns.
     
    But as I was on the site a few days ago, this bit of news caught my eye.
     
    "Paypal - Not only do they not want our business but they have banned us from using Paypal in any capacity ever again. Why? - because they found out we sell guns and gun accessories! What they thought a company called Vintage Guns sold when they accepted us in the first place I can only guess! The inconvenience has been considerable but I'm pleased to announce that we will be introducing WorldPay, the RBS system which is less arbitrary in its decrees over what is a 'nice' business and what is not. This system will once again allow clients to buy goods and services on-line through the website in a fast and secure manner."
     
    I don't use Paypal because I believe the words "pay" and "pal" to be mutually exclusive, so I know nothing of their policies regarding gun and shooting-related businesses. But virtually everyone else in the free world does. Is this true? Does Paypal really discriminate against completely legal and legitimate businesses and individuals simply because said businesses and individuals are involved in the shooting sports? If it is true then maybe "Paypal" should change its name to "Payprick." At least it'd be more honest...