Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Gun Nut
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

  • November 12, 2009

    Petzal: The Best Camo for Hunting Away from Home

    On my recent trip to Oregon, a bunch of us were sitting on a ridge waiting for a mule deer to do something stupid, and one of our number left to walk down an adjoining ridge. When he was 1,000 yards away or so the head honcho of the ranch said: “You know, I can see him as clearly as if he were wearing blaze orange. That camo of his doesn’t work.”

    And it was true. The ridgerunner was wearing some kind of dark camo designed for sitting in a tree in a Southern swamp, and at a distance all the branches and leaves and Spanish moss and  cottonmouths in the pattern blended together into a dark and highly visible mass. I’ve seen this many times; very few camo patterns travel well.

    There are three that do, and they work because ...

    ... none of them look like anything. No trees, no flowers, no chirping birds, no vines, just irregular blobs of color, none very light, and very little black or none at all. The best of these is Cabela’s Oufitter pattern. I’ve worn it in Africa, Alaska, New Zealand, and many places in between and it blends in unfailingly.

    The two others are the patterns used by Sleeping Indian and King of the Mountain, who weave it into their wool. I’ve used these from Maine to Montana and they fit right in. Unlike myself.

    Both the Army and the Marines have taken these principles to heart—to wit, the Army’s ACU pattern, and the Marines’ MARPAT, which has little globes and anchors blended into the pattern so the jarheads will not be mistaken for soldiers.

    ***

    Southpaw Alert! Niles Wheeler of Safari Outfitters (which is high-grade left-hand-gun central) advises me that he has two southpaw Model 70s just in. Both are out of the Winchester Custom Shop, one made in the late 90s, the other in 2001. They are super-fancy rifles, one in .338, the other in .35 Whelen, both in NIB condition. 845-677-5444.

  • November 10, 2009

    Bourjaily: The Best (and Worst) Shotgun Safeties

    One of the very nicest features of AyA guns (which I wrote about a month ago, here), were the safety buttons. I liked them so much I took a picture of one. As you can see, they stick up high where you can’t miss them and they practically grab your thumb like Velcro thanks to the sharp hand checkering on top. They snick off easily with a mere flick and are easily among the most positive safeties to operate that I have ever tried.

    That brings me to the subject of safeties good and bad: a good safety comes off easily so you don’t even have to ... ... think about it as you raise the gun to shoot.

    Personally, I dislike the safety on the Benelli Nova most of all. It is tiny and difficult to find in its spot in front of the trigger guard.  For repeaters, the Browning Gold’s big, triangular, easy to push safety  is the all-time best.

    When it comes to O/Us, I have seen more bird’s lives saved by the Browning Citori/Winchester 101 style selective safeties than by any other. These safeties slide side to side to select the top or bottom barrel, and forward to make the gun ready to fire. What happens instead is, in the field when people try to push them forward, the safety slides halfway between “O” and “U” and won’t go forward at all.

    The gun stays on “safe” and the bird flies away not only unscathed but unshot-at.

    Here is a simple trick to solve that problem forever: if you are right handed, switch the safety over to the left to shoot the top barrel first and leave it there. If you’re left handed, leave the safety pushed over to the right,always. There is no room to explain (and a good magician never reveals his tricks anyway) but I promise that works.

    Meanwhile, the subject is safeties: favorites, least favorites, funny stories, horror stories, whatever you got.

  • November 9, 2009

    Petzal: Testing Nosler’s New Lead-Free Ballistic Tips for Varmints

    One the one hand, I don’t give an assfull of ashes for the idea that shooting lead-free bullets will do the planet one iota of good. We get lead from the ground and we return it to the ground, albeit at very high speeds, so BFD. On the other hand, mandated lead-free zones have given us some dandy new homogeneous bullets by Hornady, Nosler, and Barnes, so it’s not a total waste.

    The most recent of this genre is from Nosler—a lead-free Ballistic Tip for varmint hunters. The batch I tested is .224-inch and 35 grains, but there will be lighter and heavier slugs out shortly. These new Ballistic Tips are made with a disintegrating copper core, an alloy jacket, an extra-large expansion cavity in the nose, and an attractive polycarbonate tip.

    To test them, I fired ...... a batch in my supernaturally accurate .223 Savage Model 12 Long Range Precision Varminter Dual Port (try saying that in one breath). I found that, with the same powder charges I used for 50-grain Ballistic Tips, I could get 3,600 fps as opposed to 3,400 fps. Accuracy was not as good as with the conventional Ballistic Tips, although the average was a half-inch, and I got some groups quite a bit smaller. The Model 12 Etcetera has a 1-9 twist, and I suspect that is a bit fast for these short, light, bullets; I think I might have done much better with 1-12 or 1-14.

    Are the Lead-Frees frangible? Rest easy. They frange just fine. Small rodents being in short supply, I shot apples, and they disintegrated in a cloud of apple juice. You can read more about the new BTs at nosler.com. Buy lots and save the environment.

  • October 12, 2009

    Bourjaily Tests the New Beretta Xplor

    Last week we speculated on Beretta’s new Xplor, a gun capable, we were told, of taking anything up to and including a dinosaur. Having just seen and shot the Xplor in Italy, I would amend that statement to read “up to and including a small dinosaur.” The A400 Xplor is a 3 ½ inch semiautomatic shotgun. It is  probably enough gun for velociraptors, but way too small for brachiosaurus or T Rex hunting, even with slugs.

    On one hand, I was slightly disappointed the Xplor didn’t turn out to be something more radical, but mostly, I was very pleased to see, handle and shoot the next generation of the excellent  A391 semiauto.  Actually, the A400 Xplor is a hybrid of the best features of  the 391 and the Xtrema, with several improvements thrown in for good measure.
    Highlights of the Xplor include:

    A redesigned gas system that will go much longer between cleanings than the already unstoppable 391 and Xtrema systems. Beretta says test guns have cycled as many as 10,000 rounds without cleaning.

    A 3 ½ receiver that is no longer than a 3-inch receiver, making this a compact gun. One of the complaints about the Xtrema was that it was hefty and bulky. This gun is neither; it feels like a 391 and is a little lighter than its predecessor.

    A bolt return spring that fits over the magazine tube a la Xtrema instead of inside the stock. A spring on the tube is easy to access and keep clean.

    An improved, optional version of the very effective Kick-Off recoil reducer. The Xplor doesn’t beat you up.

    Modern  -- but not space-age -- styling, and a receiver that is anodized to a distinctive gray-green color.  It’s a good-looking gun.

    The Xplor cycles very quickly.  As you can see in the picture* the shooter has four empties in the air at once.  Beretta claims the Xplor cycles 36% faster than any other semiauto on the market. Personally, I can’t work my trigger finger fast enough to outrun any autoloader, but some people can.

    One last bit of good news: although  most workers were out on a scheduled strike on Friday when I toured the plant (Beretta is in Italy, after all). I saw rows and rows of finished Xplors ready to ship. The 3 1/2- inch , wood stocked versions will be out next month, with synthetic waterfowl guns and a sporting gun to follow soon. The Xplor lists for around $1600 in 3 ½-inch versions. Three-inch guns should list for $100 or so less.

    *the picture is the better of two provided by Beretta for use before the gun’s official release on November 1. Although we journalists took lots of pictures in Italy, Beretta asked us to promise not to publish them until October 30.

  • September 30, 2009

    Rifles of Interest: The Savage Model 12 Series Long Range Precision Varmint Dual Port

    A couple of months back, the Savages took me on a prairie dog hunt and the evening before the shooting started I was handed a new version of the Model 12 Series Varmint in .223 to sight in. I did so, and what I saw 100 yards away in the fading light caught my interest—all five shots went in one ragged hole. Could this, I wondered, be the long-sought factory rifle that would break the ½-moa mark?

    So when the hunt was over, I asked Savage for a loaner so I could beat on it at length with a variety of ammo and, after a suitable delay they gave me one with 600 rounds through it, also in .223. Now, before I tell you how I did, I should describe the rifle.

    The Model 12 SLRPVDP is a lineal descendent of the Model 12, which won our Best of the Best award in 2006. It’s a single-shot with an oversized bolt knob, an H-S Precision Varmint stock with an aluminum bedding block (and three bedding screws), a special Accu-Trigger that can be set from 6 ounces* to 2.5 pounds, a 26-inch, deeply-fluted, extra-heavy 26-inch stainless barrel** and a ball-breaking weight of 12 pounds. “Dual Port” refers to the slots cut on both sides of the action, enabling a right-handed shooter to load from the left and eject the empties from the right. This was developed for benchrest shooters who want to get their five shots downrange as fast as possible, and is also good for prairie dog hunters whose blood is up.

    This rifle is exactly what you’d get if you went to a cutting-edge builder of varmint gunss, gave him $5,000, and asked for his best effort, except that the Model 12, etc., costs $1,273.

    The one I was loaned has a Picatinny rail on it, and I strongly recommend this. The scope I mounted is one of the new Bushnell Elite 6500s in 4.5X-30X with mil dots. A better varmint scope I have not seen, and neither have you.

    And so to shooting***. I first fired five varieties of reasonably low-rent factory ammo through the Model 12 and so forth, and it responded by doing its own version of projectile vomiting. However, with the very first handload, it announced that it was the rifle I had been looking for all these years. I was shooting 50-grain Nosler Ballistic Tips, W 748 powder, Remington brass, and CCI 450 primers, and the groups averaged .293, with the smallest group .251.

    So now the question was whether it was a one-load rifle. It is not. Using various combinations of W 748, RelodeR 7, Berger bullets, Winchester brass, CCI BR4 primers, and some match bullets that gunmaker Mickey Coleman gave me and whose maker I have forgotten, I was able to get comparable groups with ease. The overall average for everything is .306-inch, and is just about what I get from my varmint rifles that cost a hell of a lot more than $1,273. If I had used prepped cases, the groups would have been smaller.

    The Model 12 etcetera also comes in .22/250, which will probably not shoot quite as well (it being axiomatic that the more powder you burn the bigger the groups), .204 Ruger (your guess is as good as mine; I am not a fan) and 6mm Norma BR (which may actually shoot a little better). In any event, this particular rifle is the most accurate one I have ever shot that you could buy over the counter, and after 40-plus years of writing about these things, that is saying quite a lot.

    *You can set it at that weight, but it will malfunction. The trigger will release but the sear won’t. Twelve to 18 ounces will do you fine.
    **Savage, which still button-rifles and hand-straightens its barrels, takes some extra pains with these.
    ***Temperature in the 70s, and no wind at all.

  • September 17, 2009

    Bourjaily: Two Shotguns Equal One Bow?

    So I walked into the local sporting goods store a few weeks ago, not really thinking that I needed a Benelli, but there in the rack was a brand new black M2, marked as used. It was pristine, and the asking price was so low I figured if nothing else I could immediately sell it and make money. Right next to it was a next-to-new Legacy, one of Benelli’s higher grade models, also very – by Benelli standards – reasonably priced.

    I asked the kid at the counter about the two guns.

    “They’ve been test-fired only. Some guy traded them both yesterday in on a new Mathews bow.”

    It turns out the bow was fully set up, with arrows and sights and releases and quivers, and the guy got some other gear, too, but still, since when does one bow equal two guns? The kicker is, two or three years from now, the archery manufacturers will convince the guy that traded in his Benellis that his bow is now obsolete, and he’ll want to swap it for a new one.

    It’s not as if deer release a newer, faster version of themselves every couple of years. It seems like the bow that killed a deer in, say, 2005, could probably kill one today or even next year. If gunmakers could figure out how to trick us into trading for new guns every couple of seasons the way the archery manufacturers do, the firearms industry would be in a lot better shape today.

    Someone please explain this phenomenon to me.

    By the way, I bought the M2 and left the Legacy for someone else to luck into.

  • September 16, 2009

    Bourjaily: Saving Conservation Reserve Programs

    We don’t usually address conservation in this space but the way I look at it, shotguns aren’t good for much if you don’t have birds to hunt with them.

    Back in the early 80s, when fencerow to fencerow farming was devastating pheasant populations, I can remember going hunting with my cousin one day. It was right at the beginning of the whitetail population boom, and all we saw that were a couple of hen pheasants and dozens of deer. “The limit ought to be three deer a day and one pheasant a year instead of the other way around,” Shaun said.

    A few years later, the USDA’s Conservation Reserve Program came along, turning millions of acres of cropland into grass. Pheasant populations rebounded. When the prairie droughts of the late 80s and early 90s ended and rains came to the Midwest, wetland basins in idled grass fields made excellent waterfowl nesting habitat and duck populations came back as well. The strong fall flights of the last 15 years have been due to rainy weather and CRP.  We are actually “exporting” ducks to Canada as explained in this Delta Waterfowl Press release.

    CRP is not perfect – it has not met its potential to improve bobwhite habitat, for instance – but it has been great for farmland wildlife and much better than intensive row-crop agriculture, which is where we seem to be headed once again. In the last five years, 4.2 million acres have gone out of the program, and there is a potential for another 21 million acres to go back into production over the next five years.

    With the future of the program in doubt, the USDA is holding a public comment period through the rest of this month and into October as detailed in the this Pheasants Forever release.

    Take a minute to voice your support.

  • September 2, 2009

    Bourjaily: What Happened to Squirrel Hunting?

    I recently came across this press release, the relevant portion of which is quoted here:

    Rabbit and Squirrel Hunting Seasons Open Sept. 5

    Posted: August 25, 2009

    Hunting opportunities for squirrels are excellent in Iowa because hunting pressure is low, says [Iowa's forest wildlife biologist Todd] Gosselink. In the early 1960s, Iowa had 150,000 squirrel hunters and a harvest of more than 1 million squirrels compared to last fall where an estimated 23,160 squirrel hunters harvested 169,478 squirrels. Although forested habitat for squirrels has increased in the state over the last 30 years, interest in the sport has declined. Gosselink attributes this decline to more opportunity to hunt other species, like turkey and deer and the decline in Iowa's rural population.

    Here in Iowa, our squirrel hunter numbers have fallen by almost 85%. While I can’t say for sure, I would guess squirrel hunting is on the decline everywhere. You certainly don’t read about it much in Field & Stream or any other outdoor magazine anymore, nor do you see it on TV. It seems like everyone is too busy hanging treestands or trail cameras this time of year to actually go into the woods and have fun hunting.

    I have to confess I’m as guilty as anyone else on this count. I spend September and early October trying to get ahead on work so I can chase roosters  when the season opens. It’s been a least a dozen years since I last shot a squirrel. At the time I had one of those “Mr. Squirrel” distress whistles, which were an absolute hoot to use. You’d blow the whistle – actually, you sucked in to make a high-pitched shriek --- and shake the nearest bush or sapling to make it sound like something was grabbing a young squirrel. The trees would light up with angry chattering, and squirrels would come running to the spot. I have never hunted anything that would bust you as quickly as a squirrel coming to a distress whistle. They come in on full alert, expecting to see a predator. Move at all, and they vanish.

    No matter how you squirrel hunt, it’s a fine test of woodsmanship and shooting skill. And, squirrels taste great – I am particularly fond of the Squirrel Cobbler recipe in the LL Bean cookbook – but, sadly, squirrel hunting seems to be fading away. Is that true where you live, or is just that us Iowans are so big-deer happy we’ve lost sight of the important little things?

  • August 31, 2009

    Bourjaily: How to Shoot From Station 8

    Now is the time of year when a lot of hunters shoot their annual round of skeet to tune up. When they get to station 8, the last shots on the field, they encounter birds thrown seemingly right at them at a million miles an hour. They miss, then grumble that station 8 replicates no shot you would ever take in the field.  I used to say the same thing until I learned how to make the shot. Now I love station 8. The video below is of me shooting from it.

    Station 8 is nowhere near as fast and scary as it appears. There are two keys to breaking it: first, hold your gun on the lower outside corner of the square opening in the house. That puts your barrels ahead of the bird, giving you a little head start. By holding on the lower corner, you keep the gun below the line of the target where it doesn’t block your view of bird coming out of the house.

    Then, move your eyes to look into the house. Focus underneath the stack of the targets on the spot where you will first see the bird emerge. If you can pick the target up as it comes off the trap, and your gun is already ahead of it, the bird won’t seem to be going so fast. You just swing and shoot right at it. You have more time than you think to shoot station 8. Notice in the clip (courtesy of my brother-in-law Roger and his new camera) my gun isn’t moving all that quickly and the target still blows up into a ball of white dust.

  • July 29, 2009

    Rifles of Interest: The Anschutz Model 1770

    Just when you thought I was a man of the people, writing about $500 econo-guns…

    I’ve always admired Anschutz rifles because they are very accurate and very German. In a time when everyone is selling out to American culture, Anschutz remains as teutonic as lederhosen, Wagner festivals, and sauerkraut farts. However, while the 1770 could not be anything but a Deutsche Bucsche*, it is distinctly American in purpose—it is the reincarnation of a gun I remember from my youth, the walking-around varmint rifle.

    Once upon a time the proper form for hunting varmints was to sling a hunting-weight .22 centerfire across your back, put lunch and a canteen in a pack, and hike o’er hill and dale (being careful, of course, not to step in the cowflop) to see what was there. Townsend Whelen and Warren Page loved to do this, and I did too. Now, however, any respectable varmint rifle has to weigh as much as one of Rosie O’Donnell’s buttocks, which takes the fun out of the hiking.

    Enter der Anschutz 1770, which weighs just under 8 pounds, has a medium-weight barrel of just under 22 inches, and can be carried around by a normal human being. It’s chambered in .223 only, has a big tactical bolt handle, and a very nice single-stage trigger that’s set at 2 ½ pounds. The action is actually Anschutz’ first new one in a long time, and features six (!) locking lugs and a very short 60-degree bolt lift.

    The stock on my 1770 was a very, very pretty piece of fiddleback walnut with a Schweinsruken*  (hog’s-back) comb, Schnabel fore-end, and  very deep, full pistol grip. (I’ve just learned that in response to American demand, there will be a Classic 1770 with a straight comb, and a Luxus with a Monte Carlo comb.)

    The one jarring note is a detachable in-line magazine with luminous strips along its sides. I guess they’re there to keep you from losing the thing. I didn’t have the 1770 for as long as I might have liked—there was only the one in the U.S.—and so I didn’t get the kind of accuracy out of it that I’m convinced it was capable of. Most ammo turned in 3/4-inch, 5-shot groups at 100 yards, but Ich schwore* bei Gott that if I could have wrestled with it for a while longer the groups would have measured 1/2-inch.

    At $2,495 the 1770 is an expensive rifle, but it is also exotic, a wonderful piece of gunmaking, and a delightful gun to shoot. If you are jaded at all the synthetic-stocked look-alikes that grace our gunrooms, here is something truly different. Jga.anschuetz-sport.com.

    *Yes, I know the umlauts are missing. You put umlauts in my MAC and I’ll use them.