Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

  • June 19, 2012

    Why 2 Bills Introduced to the House Are Bad for Sportsmen

    By Tim Romano

    Have something to say about your public lands? It could cost you…

    My friends over at Trout Unlimited alerted me to a couple of bills that have been introduced to the House that don't sit well with me. I thought I would share.

    They went on to say that Sportsmen for Responsible Energy Development (SFRED), a coalition of businesses, organizations and individuals led by Trout Unlimited, the National Wildlife Federation and the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, has been following this set of bills. And so far, the message isn’t exactly “sportsmen friendly.”

    Among the provisions:
    - A requirement of a $5,000 documentation fee to protest any lease, stifling a process that is currently free and open to anyone who wants to participate.
    - Prioritizing energy development over fish and wildlife on public lands.
    - A mandate that leases be issued within 60 days of payment regardless of protests or litigation.
    - Requires that a minimum of 25 percent of the leases receive minimal environmental review and no protests.

  • May 15, 2009

    A New Total Outdoorsman Event?

    By Kirk Deeter