


February 23, 2010
Bourjaily: Gun Inaccuracy in Hollywood
By Philip Bourjaily
The words “Terry Bradshaw’s nude ccene” should be enough to stop anyone from watching “Failure to Launch,” a 2006 romantic comedy with Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker.
The movie is only okay, but it does contain a funny bit in a gun store. The character played by Zooey Deschanel wants to get rid of a mockingbird that annoys her with its constant singing outside her window and tries to buy a gun to shoot it with. Notice the rare Hollywood portrayal of the clerk as the good guy.
Unfortunately, this clip ends a few seconds too soon. Zooey and Jim wrestle over the green and gold Remington shell box. When they tear the box open and shells spill all over the counter, though, they’re not green Remingtons but red Federal Gold Medals. The sight caused me to point and yell at the screen, then make my poor wife and kids watch the scene several times over, in slow motion and stop action.
All I can figure is that the Remington box fit in better with the subdued color scheme of the set, but green shells didn’t show up well enough when they spilled out. Someone thought to refill the Remington box with Federals. You can get the movie and see for yourself, but remember I warned you about the "Naked Room."
Comments (58)
One of my biggest pet peeves is miss-portrayals of hunting in movies. In 'Wedding Crashers' they are quail hunting, yet using duck calls in a completely disastrous manner. AGH!
It's nice to see a retail gunseller portrayed as something other than a neanderthal.
Hollywood is collectively a bunch of goobers anyway. How would they get that right when they have the never empty pistol magazines and exploding gas tanks? I have been watching for that belt-fed 9mm pistol that never runs out of ammo, but can't seem to ever see that stealthy 100 round belt.
Goobers and more goobers.....
My favorite part of Hollywood and guns is that EVERY actor has a flinch like a 5 year old. Mel Gibson is the worst, he closes his eyes and slightly turns away BEFORE he fires. Whenever a gun is involved in a movie, I (and probably most of you) perk up waiting for the funniest part of the movie!
I always get a chuckle whenever someone in the movies goes fishing for crappies (pronouncing it crap-ees)- not one person on the set apparently knew how to pronounce it!!
Apparently I'm not the only one who has noticed that single actions apparently hold 10-12 rounds, and most lever actions are apparently drum fed. Thanks, Dave, we're with ya!
one of my favorite things to do when watching a movie with my wife is to point out what people do wrong with guns. usually if its a movie like failure to launch it gets me out of watching all of it.
Plan 9 From Outer Space, which is by most accounts the worst movie ever made (so bad, it's actually great to watch!) has a scene where a couple of cops are discussing what to do and one of them scratches his chin with the barrel of his pistol!!
@stick500-you're describing a dialectal difference in pronunciation. The OED lists it as /kræpi/, if you know IPA.
I actually enjoyed the acting in that scene. A fine job by both actors but you know the movie is bad if you spend your time looking for flaws in each scene.
of course the movie where apparently one of our own "shot himself in the foot" was Borat when he stepped into a gun shop to get the best gun to "shoot Jews with" and the store owner didn't even bat an eye as he pulled one out to show him :)
Hollywierd is hollywierd, and they have never made a good movie with guns involved. Even if they do get a technical aspect or two right, the actors pointing weapons at each other, carless carry habits, and piss poor muzzle control, not to mention flinching, impossible shots, etc, drive a former range NCO nuts!
It isn't just the poor gunhandling in movies that drives you nuts; it's the unreal ballistics. Those of us who load Magsafes in our house guns to keep from penetrating house walls have to wonder how a guy can be safe from handgun bullets because he is using an overturned card table, or an open car door, as a shield (Transporter, and how many Westerns). In Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, every effort is made to show Butch and the Kid reloading in the last scene, yet we also see the Kid snap-hipshooting shooting men off rooftops from fifty yards, sometimes by fanning. And so it goes. If you can watch Star Wars, you can watch this stuff, I figure. Just hold your nose and enjoy it.
I couldn't get through the scene without tearing hair out due to a vagrant disregard for gun sales rule numero UNO!
THE CUSTOMER DOES NOT HANDLE THE FIREARM AND THE ROUND(S) AT THE SAME TIME! If I can help it, and always can, I never ever have a gun and it's ammunition out of the case at one time. Granted, our shotshells are on the shelf where they're an easy grab, but I'd be fired for handing a customer both. Just my two cents worth.
I'm trying to find out how they modify all the guns so that they have little to no recoil. Dirty Harry is the only flick I can think of where the muzzle jumps up appropriate to the caliber.
Stick500, of course they're Crappies (Crap-ees). Makes more sense to me then (Crawp-ees). Up here on the shores of Champlain we call em crap-ees. I think its a regional thing like breem as opposed to sunfish.
The entire movie is a FREAK SHOW; Wife liked it, of course...
CountryRoad, They are using blanks.
All very good comments. But I understand the actor Stevan Seagal is a real stickler for safe gun handling in all of his movies.
When an actor is playing the part of an inept character, we should not be surprised an anything he might do, but I really have to wince when I see two cops pointing their weapons at each other while having a conversation.
I think that it's sad that neither the tree-huggers in hollywood, nor the readers of this blog mentioned that it is the female mockingbird who will sing all night when she is sitting on her nest incubating her brood. Only a profoundly uninformed person (read as Director) would try to make a joke out of shooting a bird at such a critical period of life. The funny part is that they usually show their greatest ignorance as they attempt to make us look foolish.
As for the guns; After actor Brandon Lee killed himself with a gun loaded with blanks (while goofing around between takes) hollywood has been using guns modified to fire using compressed gases. The are electrically triggered, have no wadding discharged, and have the bonus of delivering an increased muzzle flash, while still working the actions, and spewing "spent shell casings from the receiver. Good for Hollywood, but bad for Lee. Yes, he put the gun to his own head, and pulled the trigger, grinning as he did so, not knowing that blanks can be lethal at point-blank range. Very sad.
This IS "Hollywierd" we're talking about here !
I tell you guys, There's one here at my home that starts about 3 or 4 in the morning and doesent let up till noon.. I've threatened to shoot it several times.
Lazy Dazy, NO JOKE, READ MY LIPS , male or female, it has come close to being shot several times... It sits in a tree by my bedroom window... I probably would never shoot it, BUT.....probably not as bad as an elk bugling or coyote barking,
I can understand the frustration with the mockingbird, but you've never really been kept awake and annoyed until you've spent a night trying to sleep in a cabin in Wisconsin next to a lake with a couple of pair of loons. My God! Their calls are beautiful, but c'mon guys, it's annoying as hell at three a.m.
I'm with Hollywood portrays guns as if toys; jump behind a couch and you're "safe". I cringe and am force to inform everyone in the room that people shooting hundreds of rounds down city streets and crowded highways will hurt a lot of people- just ask my wife- on second thought you don't really want to do that. I do constantly inform my kids and now grandkids that all that gun play is not real and would not play out as portrayed on the screen. Also, it's not "crap ee" or "craw pee" it's speckled bass.. Ha Ha.
That was suppose to say I'm with - focusfront
All of us could go on and on regarding the antics of the morons in Hollywood. However, my very pet gun peeve of all time is actors being blown out windows, thrown against walls, and so on, by the impact of bullets or shot. Any hunter knows that this simply does not happen, and I am very surprised that it has not been mentioned by your readers. The velocity of the projectile(s) is so high that they zip through flesh before the bullet or shot can effect any "push" against the target. I have shot countless animals, birds, etc., and have never observed such a thing. A very close shotgun blast will occasionally blow a game bird a few inches away, but that's it. A very, very few directors seem to know this. I am thinking of a soldier shot by a sniper in "Full Metal Jacket", who simply collapsed in his tracks. That is the reality of a man or animal reacting to being shot, and not the total BS fed to the public by Hollywood directors, who would prefer us to remain ignorant so as to increase drama. That will never change because the public does not care about reality. Very irritating!
Tom
Good Catch Phil!
I support of the few actors who try to get it right. Has anyone seen Tom Sellek in the recently-made (since 2005) Jesse Stone films: Stone Cold, Night Passage, Death in Paradise, Sea Change, and Thin Ice. They are based on a series of detective/crime novels written by Robert Parker. Definately worth the rental fee, and Sellek is a strong NRA supporter.
Sounds like another good movie to save 7 bucks on.
You'd think after the death (on the set) of Brandon Lee (Bruce Lee's son) in the movie "The Raven" that movie makers would be more careful with prop guns, but human memories are short and self editing.
I also have been known to express umbrage over egregious firearm faux-pas in the media. They do it a lot. It has become a sort of personal trivia contest for me (kind of like the game "spot the loonie").
Glad I'm not the only one who yell's at the screen!
Personally I think the Absolute worst portrayal of guns is the old series, The A-Team, corrugated tin and 55 gallon drums do not deflect bullets. Matter of fact that's how I ventilate burn barrels. A 45 ACP will penetrate both sides of a 55 gallon drum and burrow about a foot into the ground as well. I'm sure a 223 would do at least as well!
Some of the old western run a close second, I'd like to know where they get 30 round SSA's at, I've never seen them for sale anywhere around here.
Phil, Dave, let us know if you can track down where to get those, ok?
A-team was the worst, they had enough lead flying around the highways to clear any rush hour.
I don't agree Tom. Last time I shot a deer with my .243 it flipped the animal axx over teakettle. Shot a javelina with the same rifle last weekend and same thing, even though the bullet passed clear through the pig. It's really going to depend on what part of the animal you hit. And I don't care what planet you're from, a hit from a 12 ga at close range is going to throw you backwards unless you're wearing cement shoes.
The only time I shot at a "close" game bird with a shotgun blew the bird to pieces, some of which I think went into orbit. That was No.6 shot from a 16 ga on a grouse, long ago.
ever watch the pathetic movie called BAMBI???
Time flys, but was this movie made before trigger locks were mandated in stores, or is that a state by state thing? Also don't know what the "shells" were but $15 for a box of 25 must be a lot better quality than what I am buying.
Tom and Mike-
The "blown away" thing is nothing but fiction. The reason the deer and the javelina went flying is because they jumped when they were hit.
A shotgun blast or a bullet will not throw a man across the room, through the window, over the hood of a car, etc. It has nothing to do with how fast the bullet is or whether or not it completely penetrates (zips through, as you put it). The simpe fact is that a bullet or a load of shot does not have enought mass to throw a person back.
It comes down to Newton's Third Law of Motion: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If the bullet or load of shot were able to send flying the person who was hit, the person who fired the gun would have to be thrown back just as far in the opposite direction. In fact, if you were to watch an extreme slow-motion video of a person/animal being shot, you would see the person/animal being "thrown" roughly the same distance the gun travels during recoil.
The old west six shooters that never ran out of shells,always got me.And although well disciplined in martial arts mr Lee should of known treat every gun as if it is loaded!
bonedoc is right, if you are shot, the most force you will feel is the same as the recoil to the shooter. A grouse will go flying purely because it weighs a fraction of a person. Many animals do jump or lunge when shot, people may get knocked down but blown away from a rifle or handgun? Never.
Hi Mike: I think that bonedoc33 answered this very well regarding mass of the projectile and that's a point that I also should have made. Sorry. I have been very fortunate in having killed more game, large and small than 99% of most hunters, and I must stand by what I have said. A hit with a 12 Ga. might push YOU backwards slightly with recoil, but does not have the same visible effect on the bird itself;not that I have seen. I have lost count of the number of large game animals that I have killed, and unless they ran a short distance, they all fell in their tracks, and showed no evidence of of being pushed away. I think that bonedoc was correct in that the animals you shot jumped. As to human beings being thrown around by bullets,- no way! Well, good discussion anyway!
Tom
That clip was funny!
Don´t remember what movie it was from, but ther was a scene when somebody cycled a pistol several times, and ends up out of bullets. Probably a parodic movie.
My favorite missinformation scene is in that Seagal movie in Alaska, using a 2lt pepsi bottle to silence a pistol.
Well I've actually used the plastic bottle to suppress a handgun. But what gets to me is how in all the westerns that are set in the time period just after the war between the states everyone is armed with a 1870 colt and a 1892 winchester. And how about in the modern dramas where the fired bullets cause sparks to fly off the car bodies without any penetration. Then there are the war movies where men are hit with .50 BMG and they pause, clutch their chest, and fall. The only one that came close there was the latest in the never ending sequels of Rambo.
I also like the flint bullets they have been shooting lately that emit sparks wherever they hit, whether it be brick or concrete walls, cars or even people.
Great clip
And the only being shot by a normal hunting round is not going to flip you. There is just not enough mass to a bullet to do that. Plus if a bullet goes straight through an animal like on your javelina it is not going to have any chance of flipping it because all the energy passed through the animal.
I saw what I saw. You can lecture me about the theory of how you think it ought to happen but that doesn't change the fact that you're wrong.
The plain fact is that some of the energy from a round, even a pass-through, will be imparted to the target. A 100 grain .243 has about 1300 foot pounds of energy at 200 yards. I shot that javelina at about 50 yards. I can't tell you how much of that energy was transferred to that 35 pound javelina, but I know what I saw.
Same for that deer. Much larger animal but it was thrown when hit. That one didn't pass through the deer so, one presumes, a whole lot of that bullet's energy went into the deer.
"The reason the deer and the javelina went flying is because they jumped when they were hit."
That may be. At least it sounds plausible. Of course, if animals can reflexively react to an impact, I suppose people might as well.
"It comes down to Newton's Third Law of Motion"
Sure, but conservation of energy doesn't normally have to account for buffering from a semi-auto action, a good recoil pad, or a target that is not braced for an impact the way the shooter is when he knows he's going to shoot. Also, the rifle itself absorbs alot of recoil; even if your follow through is perfect, that rifle barrel moves up.
All I'm saying is that some fraction of the energy goes to your target. Depending on how much the target weighs, whether it's off balance, and whether all the energy of the bullet gets transferred to the target, I can easily imagine it being tossed by the impact.
1300 foot pounds is alot. That's like dropping a bicycle on something from a height of 20 feet.
I am nto saying you didn't see it. I am most confident you did see it. However, my physics class and mythbusters has also proven this false. Not only could they not knock a pig down they cant shoot the hat off a persons head. You will move when a bullet hits you, but you wont go flying.
Mike, Tom, and Bonedoc33: And it doesn't matter how far the butt of the gun is from the shoulder on how much it kicks or hurt, right. That being said it kind of makes you appreciate how much energy the muscles and bone absorb so a person does not always get knocked off their feet. I too have knocked a whitetail off its feet with a 12ga 1oz slug as it ran pass me at about 15 feet; you could see air under it's hoofs as it was knocked over in the direction of slug travel. Could be it just straightened its legs at the shock, would have a had the same effect.
I've seen footage of people shot by firing squads, and they all seem to just buckle at the knees and slump down or double over and tumble forward. I remember one scene where the "target" was kneeling in front of a ditch with his hands tied behind his back. He was shot from the front, and he tumbled forward head first into the ditch.
Nolan Osborne--
I know they're using blanks. I was talking about portraying realism---nobody's gun seems to kick when they shoot it. As in, you jump off a building, you fall and when you shoot a gun, it kicks(?).
I could never bear to watch the "A" team. It was just too painful and hurt my braaaain.
Pity da fool that gives Bella paaaain! ;)
An unfortunate error occurred during the filming of "Sergeant York", starring Gary Cooper, in which the real Sgt. York served as a technical consultant. When they filmed the scene where Sgt. York shot seven or eight German soldiers. they found that the Colt 1911 would not cycle blank cartridges. So they had him use a German Luger, which did.
Then during the editing process, most of the footage of that scene wound up on the cutting roomm floor, leaving only the first shot from the Luger in the scene, with the other pictures showing the German soldiers rushing forward and falling when hit.
They could have used a real Colt 1911 for that one shot, because it did not have to cycle the rounds in the magazine.
Hollywood: Who in the hunting world with real-live Amo hunting guns is gonna fall for the crap on TV. Some of the Western Movies came close, but not real. I saw the last interview of John Wayne with Barbara Walters and what a thrill it was. He passed away soon afterwoods. He stated that in all his movies he reid his best to make his role as real as posible. He stated that many movies he made he would forget his lines, but he knew how the Movie was to go and end, so he add-libbed what he thought wold fit into the lines he forgot,etc. Now All we get on TV is a lot of real make-belief, nothing real or close. To bad the actos of today only want the $$$ and could care less how the show goes on.Not been a good movie made in many years that I thought was suitable for watching. Most movies now are geared towards the l9-34 age group, nt us elder citizens who love a good Western and a good story behind it.
Hollywood: Who in the hunting world with real-live Amo hunting guns is gonna fall for the crap on TV. Some of the Western Movies came close, but not real. I saw the last interview of John Wayne with Barbara Walters and what a thrill it was. He passed away soon afterwoods. He stated that in all his movies he reid his best to make his role as real as posible. He stated that many movies he made he would forget his lines, but he knew how the Movie was to go and end, so he add-libbed what he thought wold fit into the lines he forgot,etc. Now All we get on TV is a lot of real make-belief, nothing real or close. To bad the actos of today only want the $$$ and could care less how the show goes on.Not been a good movie made in many years that I thought was suitable for watching. Most movies now are geared towards the l9-34 age group, nt us elder citizens who love a good Western and a good story behind it.
Lets talk guns and hunting for a while. All thats on TV now is just junk.
DEP, I must correct you on something. It is not Terry Bradshaw and his 'naked room' that should keep you from watching this movie, or the typical firearm inaccuracies of hollywood. Anything and everything with Sarah Jessica Parker or Matthew McConaughey must be avoided like the plague.
Chick flick? SJP? MM? Strike three.
Post a Comment
Hollywierd is hollywierd, and they have never made a good movie with guns involved. Even if they do get a technical aspect or two right, the actors pointing weapons at each other, carless carry habits, and piss poor muzzle control, not to mention flinching, impossible shots, etc, drive a former range NCO nuts!
It's nice to see a retail gunseller portrayed as something other than a neanderthal.
Apparently I'm not the only one who has noticed that single actions apparently hold 10-12 rounds, and most lever actions are apparently drum fed. Thanks, Dave, we're with ya!
Hollywood is collectively a bunch of goobers anyway. How would they get that right when they have the never empty pistol magazines and exploding gas tanks? I have been watching for that belt-fed 9mm pistol that never runs out of ammo, but can't seem to ever see that stealthy 100 round belt.
Goobers and more goobers.....
My favorite part of Hollywood and guns is that EVERY actor has a flinch like a 5 year old. Mel Gibson is the worst, he closes his eyes and slightly turns away BEFORE he fires. Whenever a gun is involved in a movie, I (and probably most of you) perk up waiting for the funniest part of the movie!
One of my biggest pet peeves is miss-portrayals of hunting in movies. In 'Wedding Crashers' they are quail hunting, yet using duck calls in a completely disastrous manner. AGH!
Plan 9 From Outer Space, which is by most accounts the worst movie ever made (so bad, it's actually great to watch!) has a scene where a couple of cops are discussing what to do and one of them scratches his chin with the barrel of his pistol!!
of course the movie where apparently one of our own "shot himself in the foot" was Borat when he stepped into a gun shop to get the best gun to "shoot Jews with" and the store owner didn't even bat an eye as he pulled one out to show him :)
I couldn't get through the scene without tearing hair out due to a vagrant disregard for gun sales rule numero UNO!
THE CUSTOMER DOES NOT HANDLE THE FIREARM AND THE ROUND(S) AT THE SAME TIME! If I can help it, and always can, I never ever have a gun and it's ammunition out of the case at one time. Granted, our shotshells are on the shelf where they're an easy grab, but I'd be fired for handing a customer both. Just my two cents worth.
The entire movie is a FREAK SHOW; Wife liked it, of course...
CountryRoad, They are using blanks.
Good Catch Phil!
I support of the few actors who try to get it right. Has anyone seen Tom Sellek in the recently-made (since 2005) Jesse Stone films: Stone Cold, Night Passage, Death in Paradise, Sea Change, and Thin Ice. They are based on a series of detective/crime novels written by Robert Parker. Definately worth the rental fee, and Sellek is a strong NRA supporter.
I always get a chuckle whenever someone in the movies goes fishing for crappies (pronouncing it crap-ees)- not one person on the set apparently knew how to pronounce it!!
one of my favorite things to do when watching a movie with my wife is to point out what people do wrong with guns. usually if its a movie like failure to launch it gets me out of watching all of it.
@stick500-you're describing a dialectal difference in pronunciation. The OED lists it as /kræpi/, if you know IPA.
I actually enjoyed the acting in that scene. A fine job by both actors but you know the movie is bad if you spend your time looking for flaws in each scene.
It isn't just the poor gunhandling in movies that drives you nuts; it's the unreal ballistics. Those of us who load Magsafes in our house guns to keep from penetrating house walls have to wonder how a guy can be safe from handgun bullets because he is using an overturned card table, or an open car door, as a shield (Transporter, and how many Westerns). In Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, every effort is made to show Butch and the Kid reloading in the last scene, yet we also see the Kid snap-hipshooting shooting men off rooftops from fifty yards, sometimes by fanning. And so it goes. If you can watch Star Wars, you can watch this stuff, I figure. Just hold your nose and enjoy it.
I'm trying to find out how they modify all the guns so that they have little to no recoil. Dirty Harry is the only flick I can think of where the muzzle jumps up appropriate to the caliber.
Stick500, of course they're Crappies (Crap-ees). Makes more sense to me then (Crawp-ees). Up here on the shores of Champlain we call em crap-ees. I think its a regional thing like breem as opposed to sunfish.
All very good comments. But I understand the actor Stevan Seagal is a real stickler for safe gun handling in all of his movies.
When an actor is playing the part of an inept character, we should not be surprised an anything he might do, but I really have to wince when I see two cops pointing their weapons at each other while having a conversation.
I think that it's sad that neither the tree-huggers in hollywood, nor the readers of this blog mentioned that it is the female mockingbird who will sing all night when she is sitting on her nest incubating her brood. Only a profoundly uninformed person (read as Director) would try to make a joke out of shooting a bird at such a critical period of life. The funny part is that they usually show their greatest ignorance as they attempt to make us look foolish.
As for the guns; After actor Brandon Lee killed himself with a gun loaded with blanks (while goofing around between takes) hollywood has been using guns modified to fire using compressed gases. The are electrically triggered, have no wadding discharged, and have the bonus of delivering an increased muzzle flash, while still working the actions, and spewing "spent shell casings from the receiver. Good for Hollywood, but bad for Lee. Yes, he put the gun to his own head, and pulled the trigger, grinning as he did so, not knowing that blanks can be lethal at point-blank range. Very sad.
This IS "Hollywierd" we're talking about here !
All of us could go on and on regarding the antics of the morons in Hollywood. However, my very pet gun peeve of all time is actors being blown out windows, thrown against walls, and so on, by the impact of bullets or shot. Any hunter knows that this simply does not happen, and I am very surprised that it has not been mentioned by your readers. The velocity of the projectile(s) is so high that they zip through flesh before the bullet or shot can effect any "push" against the target. I have shot countless animals, birds, etc., and have never observed such a thing. A very close shotgun blast will occasionally blow a game bird a few inches away, but that's it. A very, very few directors seem to know this. I am thinking of a soldier shot by a sniper in "Full Metal Jacket", who simply collapsed in his tracks. That is the reality of a man or animal reacting to being shot, and not the total BS fed to the public by Hollywood directors, who would prefer us to remain ignorant so as to increase drama. That will never change because the public does not care about reality. Very irritating!
Tom
Glad I'm not the only one who yell's at the screen!
ever watch the pathetic movie called BAMBI???
Time flys, but was this movie made before trigger locks were mandated in stores, or is that a state by state thing? Also don't know what the "shells" were but $15 for a box of 25 must be a lot better quality than what I am buying.
Tom and Mike-
The "blown away" thing is nothing but fiction. The reason the deer and the javelina went flying is because they jumped when they were hit.
A shotgun blast or a bullet will not throw a man across the room, through the window, over the hood of a car, etc. It has nothing to do with how fast the bullet is or whether or not it completely penetrates (zips through, as you put it). The simpe fact is that a bullet or a load of shot does not have enought mass to throw a person back.
It comes down to Newton's Third Law of Motion: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If the bullet or load of shot were able to send flying the person who was hit, the person who fired the gun would have to be thrown back just as far in the opposite direction. In fact, if you were to watch an extreme slow-motion video of a person/animal being shot, you would see the person/animal being "thrown" roughly the same distance the gun travels during recoil.
Hi Mike: I think that bonedoc33 answered this very well regarding mass of the projectile and that's a point that I also should have made. Sorry. I have been very fortunate in having killed more game, large and small than 99% of most hunters, and I must stand by what I have said. A hit with a 12 Ga. might push YOU backwards slightly with recoil, but does not have the same visible effect on the bird itself;not that I have seen. I have lost count of the number of large game animals that I have killed, and unless they ran a short distance, they all fell in their tracks, and showed no evidence of of being pushed away. I think that bonedoc was correct in that the animals you shot jumped. As to human beings being thrown around by bullets,- no way! Well, good discussion anyway!
Tom
I tell you guys, There's one here at my home that starts about 3 or 4 in the morning and doesent let up till noon.. I've threatened to shoot it several times.
Lazy Dazy, NO JOKE, READ MY LIPS , male or female, it has come close to being shot several times... It sits in a tree by my bedroom window... I probably would never shoot it, BUT.....probably not as bad as an elk bugling or coyote barking,
I'm with Hollywood portrays guns as if toys; jump behind a couch and you're "safe". I cringe and am force to inform everyone in the room that people shooting hundreds of rounds down city streets and crowded highways will hurt a lot of people- just ask my wife- on second thought you don't really want to do that. I do constantly inform my kids and now grandkids that all that gun play is not real and would not play out as portrayed on the screen. Also, it's not "crap ee" or "craw pee" it's speckled bass.. Ha Ha.
That was suppose to say I'm with - focusfront
Sounds like another good movie to save 7 bucks on.
You'd think after the death (on the set) of Brandon Lee (Bruce Lee's son) in the movie "The Raven" that movie makers would be more careful with prop guns, but human memories are short and self editing.
I also have been known to express umbrage over egregious firearm faux-pas in the media. They do it a lot. It has become a sort of personal trivia contest for me (kind of like the game "spot the loonie").
Personally I think the Absolute worst portrayal of guns is the old series, The A-Team, corrugated tin and 55 gallon drums do not deflect bullets. Matter of fact that's how I ventilate burn barrels. A 45 ACP will penetrate both sides of a 55 gallon drum and burrow about a foot into the ground as well. I'm sure a 223 would do at least as well!
Some of the old western run a close second, I'd like to know where they get 30 round SSA's at, I've never seen them for sale anywhere around here.
Phil, Dave, let us know if you can track down where to get those, ok?
A-team was the worst, they had enough lead flying around the highways to clear any rush hour.
The old west six shooters that never ran out of shells,always got me.And although well disciplined in martial arts mr Lee should of known treat every gun as if it is loaded!
bonedoc is right, if you are shot, the most force you will feel is the same as the recoil to the shooter. A grouse will go flying purely because it weighs a fraction of a person. Many animals do jump or lunge when shot, people may get knocked down but blown away from a rifle or handgun? Never.
That clip was funny!
Don´t remember what movie it was from, but ther was a scene when somebody cycled a pistol several times, and ends up out of bullets. Probably a parodic movie.
My favorite missinformation scene is in that Seagal movie in Alaska, using a 2lt pepsi bottle to silence a pistol.
Well I've actually used the plastic bottle to suppress a handgun. But what gets to me is how in all the westerns that are set in the time period just after the war between the states everyone is armed with a 1870 colt and a 1892 winchester. And how about in the modern dramas where the fired bullets cause sparks to fly off the car bodies without any penetration. Then there are the war movies where men are hit with .50 BMG and they pause, clutch their chest, and fall. The only one that came close there was the latest in the never ending sequels of Rambo.
I also like the flint bullets they have been shooting lately that emit sparks wherever they hit, whether it be brick or concrete walls, cars or even people.
Mike, Tom, and Bonedoc33: And it doesn't matter how far the butt of the gun is from the shoulder on how much it kicks or hurt, right. That being said it kind of makes you appreciate how much energy the muscles and bone absorb so a person does not always get knocked off their feet. I too have knocked a whitetail off its feet with a 12ga 1oz slug as it ran pass me at about 15 feet; you could see air under it's hoofs as it was knocked over in the direction of slug travel. Could be it just straightened its legs at the shock, would have a had the same effect.
An unfortunate error occurred during the filming of "Sergeant York", starring Gary Cooper, in which the real Sgt. York served as a technical consultant. When they filmed the scene where Sgt. York shot seven or eight German soldiers. they found that the Colt 1911 would not cycle blank cartridges. So they had him use a German Luger, which did.
Then during the editing process, most of the footage of that scene wound up on the cutting roomm floor, leaving only the first shot from the Luger in the scene, with the other pictures showing the German soldiers rushing forward and falling when hit.
They could have used a real Colt 1911 for that one shot, because it did not have to cycle the rounds in the magazine.
I can understand the frustration with the mockingbird, but you've never really been kept awake and annoyed until you've spent a night trying to sleep in a cabin in Wisconsin next to a lake with a couple of pair of loons. My God! Their calls are beautiful, but c'mon guys, it's annoying as hell at three a.m.
The only time I shot at a "close" game bird with a shotgun blew the bird to pieces, some of which I think went into orbit. That was No.6 shot from a 16 ga on a grouse, long ago.
Great clip
And the only being shot by a normal hunting round is not going to flip you. There is just not enough mass to a bullet to do that. Plus if a bullet goes straight through an animal like on your javelina it is not going to have any chance of flipping it because all the energy passed through the animal.
I saw what I saw. You can lecture me about the theory of how you think it ought to happen but that doesn't change the fact that you're wrong.
The plain fact is that some of the energy from a round, even a pass-through, will be imparted to the target. A 100 grain .243 has about 1300 foot pounds of energy at 200 yards. I shot that javelina at about 50 yards. I can't tell you how much of that energy was transferred to that 35 pound javelina, but I know what I saw.
Same for that deer. Much larger animal but it was thrown when hit. That one didn't pass through the deer so, one presumes, a whole lot of that bullet's energy went into the deer.
"The reason the deer and the javelina went flying is because they jumped when they were hit."
That may be. At least it sounds plausible. Of course, if animals can reflexively react to an impact, I suppose people might as well.
"It comes down to Newton's Third Law of Motion"
Sure, but conservation of energy doesn't normally have to account for buffering from a semi-auto action, a good recoil pad, or a target that is not braced for an impact the way the shooter is when he knows he's going to shoot. Also, the rifle itself absorbs alot of recoil; even if your follow through is perfect, that rifle barrel moves up.
All I'm saying is that some fraction of the energy goes to your target. Depending on how much the target weighs, whether it's off balance, and whether all the energy of the bullet gets transferred to the target, I can easily imagine it being tossed by the impact.
1300 foot pounds is alot. That's like dropping a bicycle on something from a height of 20 feet.
I am nto saying you didn't see it. I am most confident you did see it. However, my physics class and mythbusters has also proven this false. Not only could they not knock a pig down they cant shoot the hat off a persons head. You will move when a bullet hits you, but you wont go flying.
I've seen footage of people shot by firing squads, and they all seem to just buckle at the knees and slump down or double over and tumble forward. I remember one scene where the "target" was kneeling in front of a ditch with his hands tied behind his back. He was shot from the front, and he tumbled forward head first into the ditch.
Nolan Osborne--
I know they're using blanks. I was talking about portraying realism---nobody's gun seems to kick when they shoot it. As in, you jump off a building, you fall and when you shoot a gun, it kicks(?).
I could never bear to watch the "A" team. It was just too painful and hurt my braaaain.
Pity da fool that gives Bella paaaain! ;)
Hollywood: Who in the hunting world with real-live Amo hunting guns is gonna fall for the crap on TV. Some of the Western Movies came close, but not real. I saw the last interview of John Wayne with Barbara Walters and what a thrill it was. He passed away soon afterwoods. He stated that in all his movies he reid his best to make his role as real as posible. He stated that many movies he made he would forget his lines, but he knew how the Movie was to go and end, so he add-libbed what he thought wold fit into the lines he forgot,etc. Now All we get on TV is a lot of real make-belief, nothing real or close. To bad the actos of today only want the $$$ and could care less how the show goes on.Not been a good movie made in many years that I thought was suitable for watching. Most movies now are geared towards the l9-34 age group, nt us elder citizens who love a good Western and a good story behind it.
Hollywood: Who in the hunting world with real-live Amo hunting guns is gonna fall for the crap on TV. Some of the Western Movies came close, but not real. I saw the last interview of John Wayne with Barbara Walters and what a thrill it was. He passed away soon afterwoods. He stated that in all his movies he reid his best to make his role as real as posible. He stated that many movies he made he would forget his lines, but he knew how the Movie was to go and end, so he add-libbed what he thought wold fit into the lines he forgot,etc. Now All we get on TV is a lot of real make-belief, nothing real or close. To bad the actos of today only want the $$$ and could care less how the show goes on.Not been a good movie made in many years that I thought was suitable for watching. Most movies now are geared towards the l9-34 age group, nt us elder citizens who love a good Western and a good story behind it.
Lets talk guns and hunting for a while. All thats on TV now is just junk.
DEP, I must correct you on something. It is not Terry Bradshaw and his 'naked room' that should keep you from watching this movie, or the typical firearm inaccuracies of hollywood. Anything and everything with Sarah Jessica Parker or Matthew McConaughey must be avoided like the plague.
Chick flick? SJP? MM? Strike three.
I don't agree Tom. Last time I shot a deer with my .243 it flipped the animal axx over teakettle. Shot a javelina with the same rifle last weekend and same thing, even though the bullet passed clear through the pig. It's really going to depend on what part of the animal you hit. And I don't care what planet you're from, a hit from a 12 ga at close range is going to throw you backwards unless you're wearing cement shoes.
Post a Comment