


August 19, 2010
Is Catch and Release "Playing With Your Food?"
By Kirk Deeter

I spent last week on the Nushagak River in Alaska, taking part in the Bristol Bay Fly Fishing and Guide Academy. It's a great program involving The Nature Conservancy, Trout Unlimited, The Bristol Bay Native Corporation, and the Bureau of Land Management, through which young native men and women are taught the basics of fly fishing and guiding. They learn more about fly "culture" and we learn more about Yup'ik culture, as we all have a vested interest in the long term health of the rivers and salmon in that region. I saw some great guide prospects in this bunch... you want to talk about people who know where fish hang out in a river... amazing. I'll write more on this soon.
One of the most interesting aspects of this exchange was talking about the catch and release issue. Yup' ik culture teaches that an animal is aware of the hunter or fisherman's presence... and that it presents itself for the taking, giving itself to the person. By not taking the animal humanely, the hunter/angler is perhaps guilty of insult...
And yet, the natives I talked with could also understand the rationale behind my catch-and-release ethic. I had to convince them that fly fishermen aren't just "playing with their food." If we try to support as large a fish population as possible... and if we are able to generate sustainable income (as well as food) by doing so, this may be another way of looking at a greater plan.
It was an interesting discussion... particularly since it wasn't just among recreational anglers, but also included people whose culture has been sustained by salmon for many generations. I don't think any of us came away with a full resolution. I don't equate not killing fish with refusing a sacrament, but I clearly see the point. For example, I don't imagine ever walking into the woods and shooting a deer or elk with a paintball. And I also think people who mishandle, ogle, suffocate (ultimately killing but not eating fish) deserve far more criticism than the angler who pops a few trout in the creel now and then.
On that, the natives and I were in full agreement. Whether you keep a fish or release it... the angler's actions should always be done with respect for the fish foremost in mind. --Deeter
Comments (10)
"Playing with your food" was a concept designed by Native American lawyers wanting to take a bigger piece of the harvest pie. Sportsman, over the years, would catch far less than their allotted half of a salmon run on the WestCoast, while the Natives took well over their half, and then more for "ceremonial" purposes which amounted to a take threatening the existence of runs of salmon up the rivers to spawn. The Sportsman said they didn't want to kill a portion of their allotment choosing to hook and release fish. The Natives said, "Fine, if you don't take them, we will include them on top of our allotment. The Natives set the definition of fish as food, and not to be played with.
Fishing is a sport to me and has nothing to do with food or economics. I can easily see how a person who relies on fishing for food can have different feelings towards fishing.
I do feel that both the sportsman and the subsistence fisherman share a lot of the same respect for the animal.
Deet ~ I gotta say the Yup'ik culture completely disengages everything I know to be true about stealth, timely capture and harmless release. Good grief!
I'm not about to re-learn all I know nor should the native Yup'ik change honored ways. They say East meets West without change. How 'bout South meets North?
Every native guide service I've used Kenai and 200 miles inland has never espoused such drivel. Spent big $$$ up there being from Washington State and maybe that's why I never heard this ethnic point of view.
count, If you lived in WA ST. during the Bolt years, you should understand what I am talking about. I can remember specifically that sportsman were very concerned about the threat to runs posed by netting on the Chehalis River system. The tribe causing the problem were the Quinaults who had their own hatchery on the Quinault River. They not only netted their river, but went outside their boundary and excessively netted the Chehalis system to where the Satsop, and the Wynoochee runs were threatened. The Sportsman got the provision passed that they would hook and release Salmon on those threatened rivers, and the natives said, "We do not play with our food" If you don't want your portion, and want to let them go, we will add them to our totals. And that's a fact. This fly fishing thing is to provide them another source of income...guiding, and Lodge ownership I believe.
Sayfu ~ Lived through the asinine Bolt years, tried like hello to fish through them as well.
Judge Bolt...now there was a piece of work. The bumper stickers back then read, "Can Judge Bolt, not Salmon!"
Do you remember? Had a buddy with property on the Satsop back in '96-'98. You drove along the siding road, past the ma & pa grocery and turned right across the RR tracks just when you began to lose sight of the Nuclear Cooling Towers. Big slabs right now, this time of year! 35, 40 pounders not uncommon...
Every time I saw a pick up truck with 2 hay bales heading toward the Chehalis, I knew what was about to happen, and it wasn't to be used for cattle.
Those were depressing times for me. My life along with my wife's was into that Salmon/steelhead fishing. The Bolt decision consumed hours of my day every day. Even the lousy decision was interpreted extremely liberal in favor of native, commercial netting. And I know the argument from the other side of the isle. But that is the first time I heard that description said of anadromous fish...."they are not to be played with." The Natives held the upper hand, and wanted all the allocation if the sportsman was going to let his portion go. I had the hairiest boat ride of my life on the Satsop. Put in below the dam, and had to float down river in my small, jetboat fishing for Summer-run steelhead, because the water was so low. We got almost to the takeout, and there was a massive logjam above the takeout. Pushed the boat upriver to a fork, and tried to get down it, and no chance. Button up the hatches, strap everything down, and up river we went, just missing stumps, through bushes along the bank, and made it back up. Before the run up, I got out, and went to a home looking to borrow a chain saw, and try to cut my way through the jam. The takeout ramp was Black?.Black Creek?
count...now that I think about it, that scary boat ride was on the Wynoochee, not the Satsop.
somehow i don't think the fish is going to feel "insulted" becuase you released it.
"the natives I talked with could also understand the rationale behind my catch-and-release ethic..."
What about the another natives?
Sayfu...In general, and it is a general statement, the younger natives are the most opportunistic..the elders will buy into conservation policy. The younger ones see the catch and release as an opportunity to make money guiding, and lodge ownership...and then net as they want as well. They have the upper hand in the courts, and know it. Any one cultural group would do the same thing. Times may have changed since I was involved in it 20 some years ago, but I doubt it.
Post a Comment
somehow i don't think the fish is going to feel "insulted" becuase you released it.
Fishing is a sport to me and has nothing to do with food or economics. I can easily see how a person who relies on fishing for food can have different feelings towards fishing.
I do feel that both the sportsman and the subsistence fisherman share a lot of the same respect for the animal.
Deet ~ I gotta say the Yup'ik culture completely disengages everything I know to be true about stealth, timely capture and harmless release. Good grief!
I'm not about to re-learn all I know nor should the native Yup'ik change honored ways. They say East meets West without change. How 'bout South meets North?
Every native guide service I've used Kenai and 200 miles inland has never espoused such drivel. Spent big $$$ up there being from Washington State and maybe that's why I never heard this ethnic point of view.
count, If you lived in WA ST. during the Bolt years, you should understand what I am talking about. I can remember specifically that sportsman were very concerned about the threat to runs posed by netting on the Chehalis River system. The tribe causing the problem were the Quinaults who had their own hatchery on the Quinault River. They not only netted their river, but went outside their boundary and excessively netted the Chehalis system to where the Satsop, and the Wynoochee runs were threatened. The Sportsman got the provision passed that they would hook and release Salmon on those threatened rivers, and the natives said, "We do not play with our food" If you don't want your portion, and want to let them go, we will add them to our totals. And that's a fact. This fly fishing thing is to provide them another source of income...guiding, and Lodge ownership I believe.
Sayfu ~ Lived through the asinine Bolt years, tried like hello to fish through them as well.
Judge Bolt...now there was a piece of work. The bumper stickers back then read, "Can Judge Bolt, not Salmon!"
Do you remember? Had a buddy with property on the Satsop back in '96-'98. You drove along the siding road, past the ma & pa grocery and turned right across the RR tracks just when you began to lose sight of the Nuclear Cooling Towers. Big slabs right now, this time of year! 35, 40 pounders not uncommon...
Every time I saw a pick up truck with 2 hay bales heading toward the Chehalis, I knew what was about to happen, and it wasn't to be used for cattle.
Those were depressing times for me. My life along with my wife's was into that Salmon/steelhead fishing. The Bolt decision consumed hours of my day every day. Even the lousy decision was interpreted extremely liberal in favor of native, commercial netting. And I know the argument from the other side of the isle. But that is the first time I heard that description said of anadromous fish...."they are not to be played with." The Natives held the upper hand, and wanted all the allocation if the sportsman was going to let his portion go. I had the hairiest boat ride of my life on the Satsop. Put in below the dam, and had to float down river in my small, jetboat fishing for Summer-run steelhead, because the water was so low. We got almost to the takeout, and there was a massive logjam above the takeout. Pushed the boat upriver to a fork, and tried to get down it, and no chance. Button up the hatches, strap everything down, and up river we went, just missing stumps, through bushes along the bank, and made it back up. Before the run up, I got out, and went to a home looking to borrow a chain saw, and try to cut my way through the jam. The takeout ramp was Black?.Black Creek?
count...now that I think about it, that scary boat ride was on the Wynoochee, not the Satsop.
"the natives I talked with could also understand the rationale behind my catch-and-release ethic..."
What about the another natives?
Sayfu...In general, and it is a general statement, the younger natives are the most opportunistic..the elders will buy into conservation policy. The younger ones see the catch and release as an opportunity to make money guiding, and lodge ownership...and then net as they want as well. They have the upper hand in the courts, and know it. Any one cultural group would do the same thing. Times may have changed since I was involved in it 20 some years ago, but I doubt it.
"Playing with your food" was a concept designed by Native American lawyers wanting to take a bigger piece of the harvest pie. Sportsman, over the years, would catch far less than their allotted half of a salmon run on the WestCoast, while the Natives took well over their half, and then more for "ceremonial" purposes which amounted to a take threatening the existence of runs of salmon up the rivers to spawn. The Sportsman said they didn't want to kill a portion of their allotment choosing to hook and release fish. The Natives said, "Fine, if you don't take them, we will include them on top of our allotment. The Natives set the definition of fish as food, and not to be played with.
Post a Comment