Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Wolf Delisted: This Time They Got It Right

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Conservationist
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

May 05, 2011

Wolf Delisted: This Time They Got It Right

By Hal Herring

Effective today, the gray wolf in the Northern Rockies and the Great Lakes states will be taken off the Endangered Species List and placed under the management of the states like the rest of our valued wildlife.

The wolf issue has been a long struggle, and a wild ride here in the Rocky Mountains. People in the West have been exhausted by what Montana Wildlife Federation's Ben Lamb once called, “the absolute intransigence of both sides, the wolf huggers over here and the shoot-shovel-shut up crowd over there, leering at each other and making smart remarks while everybody else is left trying to find a solution.” Senator Jon Tester of Montana and Representative Alan Simpson of Idaho have done a tremendous job in walking right into the middle of a blistering debate and creating a solution. It is a solution hated by the most radical environmental groups, and deemed unacceptable by the perpetually furious anti-wolf crowd. So it is probably just about dead-on.

The hunters who come to the Field and Stream website know what a monumental day this is, both for us, for big game, and for the gray wolf. Because wolf re-introduction, however hotly contested it has been, is a remarkable success story of the recovery of a species, and a species that almost no other nation on earth would have tried to recover. Love them or hate them, or just feel, as I do that, as the old saying goes about difficult people, "the world needs a few of them, even if it can't take a lot of them."

The solution crafted by Senator Tester and Representative Simpson, and adopted by the Department of Interior, effective May 5th, returns the wolves to state management in Idaho and Montana, and will allow state management in parts of Utah, Oregon, and Washington as the wolves expand their ranges into and within those areas.

When Wyoming comes up with an acceptable plan to manage their wolves without exterminating them, they'll be in control of them, too. The US Fish and Wildlife Service will maintain a role in monitoring wolf populations and gathering data, which is a good thing, because it means we'll know more in years to come than we know. It will be extremely difficult for anyone to use lawsuits to put the wolf population back on the Endangered Species List, as has been done too many times before.

Hooray for elected officials who shoulder burdens well, and offer a reasoned response to a screeching match that has gone on too long and fed too many agendas that had too little to do with wolves or elk or wildlife and wild places. Hooray for the North American Model of Wildlife Management, and the restoration of our magnificent big game herds, and the protection of their habitat, that mighty success story of American hunting, without which there could be no wolves, no wolf lovers, no wolf haters.

Comments (17)

Top Rated
All Comments
from jeffo52284 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

well put. now we just need Wyoming to get on board. we are not trying to wipe the wolves out again because they are amazing animals but it is a species that needs to be managed to protect other species. cant wait to buy my wolf tag

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bioboy wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Its great that management goes back to the states for wolves. But unfortunately using a rider on another bill to avoid the Endangered Species Act could lead to some large problems. Namely, now there is a way for people and industries to skirt the protection provided by the ESA. Meaning other wildlife species (and the land they use) that are still endangered are now more at risk for being left unprotected. Essentially the effectiveness of the ESA is now in question.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hal herring wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I agree, bioboy.

The idea here was that the wolf as apex predator, with so many implications inherent in its recovery, is unique.

Once again, citizens will have to stand up for what is right. It's not hard to see somebody saying the same thing said about the wolf, about the furbish lousewort or the Preble's jumping mouse. I'm betting they won't-
or they won't get away with it if they do, but you are exactly right, the danger is there. The ESA has always had some very big very powerful enemies.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Roderick K. Purcell wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I think the spotlight is really on hunters in Montana, Idaho and other wolf states. We have to walk our talk and support sound wildlife management, not just run amok and go to war against predators. We earned this opportunity, let's make the most of it. We cannot let the politicians and the zealots screw us over.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I'll always remember this Cinco de Mayo, as the day the wolf was officially delisted.

I'm not concerned with other species being delisted and the ESA being eroded. Don't forget the science of the matter was solidly on delisting as was the USFWS. The support for delisting was also broad and bipartisan amongst the states affected. I doubt 90% of the populations of most states have even heard of the Prebles Jumping Mouse, but every pre schooler in Montana knows the wolf.

My thoughts now turn to the future.

Will state departments of wildlife be able to control wolf numbers well enough to maintain robust herds of elk and plentiful moose? After the excitement dies off how many hunters will be willing to spend money on a tag for a predator they are unlikely to shoot and even less likely to eat?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from baconboy206 wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

british columbia has lots of wolves and lots of deer elk and moose, so i dont think effectively managing the wolves will be a problem, however i think it could be better done with trappers trapping the wolves for fur, the number of wolves killed can be controlled very well as can the location of the kills and somebody gets to make a living. From the people who i have talked to in british columbia, they have told me shooting wolves by sporting means is fairly difficult, and most people who want to score a few furs trap them, though one man talked to said he used to run them over with a snowmobile.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Hopefully Michigan's DNR puts out some tags in a lottery system, last time I was up to the old deer camp in Da Youpper all I seen was wolf tracks! Its about time!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from db270 wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

I think hunting wolves will never "go out of style." I just hope states devote the necessary funds and energy to carefully research best management practices. There are some state conservation departments that appear to have no idea what's the best comprimise between the game and the hunter...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

So kute and kuddly, everyone wants one for a pet!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

But for these residents, live in the neighborhood holds a different meaning!!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

So cute & cuddly, everyone wants one for a pet!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

But for these residents, live in the neighborhood holds a different meaning!!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

It's about time. I dont know why it took so long to get this done. This should be a holiday! the day when we saved a bunch of other animals. Deer,elk,bear,cougar,dogs,cattle,bighorn sheep.mountain goats.lama's, these are animals that have been killed by wolves in idaho. I guess you can say they have saved maybe a humman from being killed. Did anybody here about that lady in alaska getting killed by wolves. there has been a few cases in idaho that have been very close.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Don't hold your breath on this problem being solved...still lots of holes and federal control, which means room for special interest to get in the way of game managers...going to take more than some politics to get back the 90% of our elk herd we lost here in the Lolo.....but maybe we can thin them back a little so they don't have the game pressured into town and hunting in our yards like this winter....

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from elkslayer wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

don't get too excited, the tree humpers have already filed another lawsuit to challenge the the delisting ryder in the budget bill. REading comments from them on their supporting sites it is ridiculous how ignorant they are of reality.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed Fishhead wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Those bloody photos remind me of the cuddly wolf pups that the animal rights people are always putting out when they ask for money to save the wolves.

Animal rights people: ooooh cuddly wolf!

Wolf haters: ohhh cruel evil wolf! killed the pretty buffalo babeee. Bit my dog!!!

They are just wolves. Real hunters are predators, too. they don't bust into tears at the sight of a killed buffalo or elk.

If you read about the delisting, you would see that most people are as sick of anti-wolf propaganda as they are the animals rights propaganda.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from krwheeler wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Just like the rest of the media, you put your foot in your mouth without checking your facts. Wyoming does NOT want to exterminate wolves. They have a two part plan - Trophy class in the area surrounding Yellowstone Park, and classed as a predator in the remainder of the state. Wyoming knows what it's doing. Now if the FEDS can get on board, and OK Wyoming's proposal, they should be able to agree to it.

Having just moved from Wyoming to Texas, I am well aware of the parts of this charade, and I know what Wyoming is talking about.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hal herring wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Howdy, kr.

I wouldn't assume to know what Wyoming wants to do, or doesn't want to do, to or with their wolves.

I just know that the dual status classification of wolves in Wyoming fails to pass the federal standards for recovering an endangered species. Yes, a judge ruled that it did, and then his ruling was overturned by a higher court.

I deal in the actual here, not the theoretical- gee, what if the feds just woke up one day and changed their minds about the Wyoming plan, and then the courts agreed that they had ruled wrong, and then the sun came out and everything was jolly.

That's not my job. And having covered the wolf issue from almost every angle since the 90's (while living in wolf country), I'm not "just like the rest of the media."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 1 week ago

something tells me this fight isn't over. enjoy it while you can. what are tags going for?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Roderick K. Purcell wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I think the spotlight is really on hunters in Montana, Idaho and other wolf states. We have to walk our talk and support sound wildlife management, not just run amok and go to war against predators. We earned this opportunity, let's make the most of it. We cannot let the politicians and the zealots screw us over.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bioboy wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

Its great that management goes back to the states for wolves. But unfortunately using a rider on another bill to avoid the Endangered Species Act could lead to some large problems. Namely, now there is a way for people and industries to skirt the protection provided by the ESA. Meaning other wildlife species (and the land they use) that are still endangered are now more at risk for being left unprotected. Essentially the effectiveness of the ESA is now in question.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I'll always remember this Cinco de Mayo, as the day the wolf was officially delisted.

I'm not concerned with other species being delisted and the ESA being eroded. Don't forget the science of the matter was solidly on delisting as was the USFWS. The support for delisting was also broad and bipartisan amongst the states affected. I doubt 90% of the populations of most states have even heard of the Prebles Jumping Mouse, but every pre schooler in Montana knows the wolf.

My thoughts now turn to the future.

Will state departments of wildlife be able to control wolf numbers well enough to maintain robust herds of elk and plentiful moose? After the excitement dies off how many hunters will be willing to spend money on a tag for a predator they are unlikely to shoot and even less likely to eat?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed Fishhead wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Those bloody photos remind me of the cuddly wolf pups that the animal rights people are always putting out when they ask for money to save the wolves.

Animal rights people: ooooh cuddly wolf!

Wolf haters: ohhh cruel evil wolf! killed the pretty buffalo babeee. Bit my dog!!!

They are just wolves. Real hunters are predators, too. they don't bust into tears at the sight of a killed buffalo or elk.

If you read about the delisting, you would see that most people are as sick of anti-wolf propaganda as they are the animals rights propaganda.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hal herring wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Howdy, kr.

I wouldn't assume to know what Wyoming wants to do, or doesn't want to do, to or with their wolves.

I just know that the dual status classification of wolves in Wyoming fails to pass the federal standards for recovering an endangered species. Yes, a judge ruled that it did, and then his ruling was overturned by a higher court.

I deal in the actual here, not the theoretical- gee, what if the feds just woke up one day and changed their minds about the Wyoming plan, and then the courts agreed that they had ruled wrong, and then the sun came out and everything was jolly.

That's not my job. And having covered the wolf issue from almost every angle since the 90's (while living in wolf country), I'm not "just like the rest of the media."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from db270 wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

I think hunting wolves will never "go out of style." I just hope states devote the necessary funds and energy to carefully research best management practices. There are some state conservation departments that appear to have no idea what's the best comprimise between the game and the hunter...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Don't hold your breath on this problem being solved...still lots of holes and federal control, which means room for special interest to get in the way of game managers...going to take more than some politics to get back the 90% of our elk herd we lost here in the Lolo.....but maybe we can thin them back a little so they don't have the game pressured into town and hunting in our yards like this winter....

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jeffo52284 wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

well put. now we just need Wyoming to get on board. we are not trying to wipe the wolves out again because they are amazing animals but it is a species that needs to be managed to protect other species. cant wait to buy my wolf tag

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hal herring wrote 1 year 3 weeks ago

I agree, bioboy.

The idea here was that the wolf as apex predator, with so many implications inherent in its recovery, is unique.

Once again, citizens will have to stand up for what is right. It's not hard to see somebody saying the same thing said about the wolf, about the furbish lousewort or the Preble's jumping mouse. I'm betting they won't-
or they won't get away with it if they do, but you are exactly right, the danger is there. The ESA has always had some very big very powerful enemies.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

So kute and kuddly, everyone wants one for a pet!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

But for these residents, live in the neighborhood holds a different meaning!!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

It's about time. I dont know why it took so long to get this done. This should be a holiday! the day when we saved a bunch of other animals. Deer,elk,bear,cougar,dogs,cattle,bighorn sheep.mountain goats.lama's, these are animals that have been killed by wolves in idaho. I guess you can say they have saved maybe a humman from being killed. Did anybody here about that lady in alaska getting killed by wolves. there has been a few cases in idaho that have been very close.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from elkslayer wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

don't get too excited, the tree humpers have already filed another lawsuit to challenge the the delisting ryder in the budget bill. REading comments from them on their supporting sites it is ridiculous how ignorant they are of reality.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from krwheeler wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Just like the rest of the media, you put your foot in your mouth without checking your facts. Wyoming does NOT want to exterminate wolves. They have a two part plan - Trophy class in the area surrounding Yellowstone Park, and classed as a predator in the remainder of the state. Wyoming knows what it's doing. Now if the FEDS can get on board, and OK Wyoming's proposal, they should be able to agree to it.

Having just moved from Wyoming to Texas, I am well aware of the parts of this charade, and I know what Wyoming is talking about.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 1 week ago

something tells me this fight isn't over. enjoy it while you can. what are tags going for?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from baconboy206 wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

british columbia has lots of wolves and lots of deer elk and moose, so i dont think effectively managing the wolves will be a problem, however i think it could be better done with trappers trapping the wolves for fur, the number of wolves killed can be controlled very well as can the location of the kills and somebody gets to make a living. From the people who i have talked to in british columbia, they have told me shooting wolves by sporting means is fairly difficult, and most people who want to score a few furs trap them, though one man talked to said he used to run them over with a snowmobile.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

Hopefully Michigan's DNR puts out some tags in a lottery system, last time I was up to the old deer camp in Da Youpper all I seen was wolf tracks! Its about time!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 2 weeks ago

So cute & cuddly, everyone wants one for a pet!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

But for these residents, live in the neighborhood holds a different meaning!!

http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/trophyroom/recent/single?pnid=10013...

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs