Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Conservation Roundup: Sportsmen Lose Millions

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Conservationist
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

November 18, 2011

Conservation Roundup: Sportsmen Lose Millions

by Bob Marshall

$615 Million Cut from Conservation

Sportsmen got a sneak preview of how much Congress values their issues earlier this week, and it wasn't pretty: House and Senate appropriators agreed to cut $615 million from key fish and wildlife conservation programs that support public hunting and fishing--not to mention the overall quality of human health.

The cuts were contained in the 2012 “minibus” spending bill, so-called because it will only keep the government running another four weeks, rather than a regular "omnibus" spending bill which would have provided funding through the end of the fiscal year. 

Among the drastic cuts announced:

• Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program cut by $35 million.

• Wetlands Reserve Program cut by approximately $200 million.

• Grasslands Reserve Program cut by approximately $30 million.

• Environmental Quality Incentives Program cut by $350 million.

Included in those cuts was a defunding of the landmark Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program, also known as Open Fields, that establishes a system to allow private landowners to open their property to public outdoor recreation--including hunting and fishing.

I detailed the impact such cuts will have on your hunting and fishing in the September issue of the magazine. 

That report drew supporting comment from the chief of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

And remember, this is just the first round of cuts opponents of conservation spending have planned. Hunters and anglers need to join everyone else concerned about the future of fish, wildlife and outdoor recreation, and get the message to their congressional delegation that the facts show conservation spending actually reduces the deficit and supports more than six million jobs.

You can find out who your reps are and how to contact them here.

NOAA Seeking Comment on Enforcement Plan

Sportsmen know a fisheries management plan is only as good as the compliance it draws from fishers. That's one reason NOAA is seeking public comment until January ninth on the draft of its new and--hopefully--improved enforcement program.

According to the agency, "These enforcement priorities are the latest step NOAA is taking to improve its enforcement program, and will help the agency emphasize compliance through better communication with fishermen. Other improvements in the last two years include new leadership, higher-level review of charging decisions, and a new penalty policy to ensure more consistent penalties nationwide."

You can view the plan and submit a comment at www.gc.noaa.gov/enforce-office.html.

Comments (21)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Sayfu wrote 27 weeks 5 hours ago

What I tell'ya? And this will continue for quite some time until decent, commonsense ECON 101 policy is enacted, and get back to expanding the tax base, increasing tax revenues rather than policy that is now SHRINKING our economy. Not even women, and children will be spared.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WesternMassHole wrote 27 weeks 3 hours ago

I heard a story on the radio about the government testing a new unmanned missile/drone that can fly at speeds exceeding 3000 mph and can reach anywhere on the globe in under an hour and they succesfully tested it off of Hawaii. Only cost them $69 Million to do the test. Maybe scrap some of these government funded BS defense programs and allow programs that add to the economy to be left untouched.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Muleynut30.06 wrote 27 weeks 1 hour ago

One little piece of good news is though Obama put off a descion on a massive pipeline that will run from the candian tar sands to the coast of Texas which would have caused unheard of environmental damage.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ancguy wrote 27 weeks 31 min ago

Well what exactly don't people understand about "Cut government spending?" Everyone seems to think that only the programs that don't affect them will be cut, and the ones they like are somehow exempt. Cutting taxes, reducing the size of government means everything's up for cuts. Unless your programs can afford expensive lobbyists who can in effect bribe important members of Congress, your pet programs are destined for the chopping block.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 6 days ago

WesternMassHole...Rather interesting isn't it to watch two of Obama's extreme liberal groups battle it out for who has the most power. The far left environmentalists want all those pipeline, high paying union jobs shutdown, and the Unions are complaining to Obama that they are a huge contributor, and their union unemployment numbers are running around 16%. Who do you think is going to win? Private co. real jobs benefiting the economy, and lowering our debt?..or the environmentalists?

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from mplane wrote 26 weeks 5 days ago

Medicare, medicaid, social security, and defense. These are the only real drivers of our budgetary problems. Medicare and medicaid alone are an impending disaster. We could nickle and dime away pretty much everything else, but without reforming the latter entitlement programs, we'll still be in exactly the same mess. Even if all funding for conservation could be eliminated, and all public hunting lands were sold off to raise revenue, it would still be like bailing a sinking ship with a teaspoon compared to the enormous leaks represented by medicare, medicaid, social security, and defense. We need our representatives to get real about the problem. They seem to think that fishing for quarters in the sofa cushions is going to pay the mortgage on a Mcmansion we can't afford! Reform the big entitlements, get defense down to reasonable levels and then let's talk. Until then, this whole process is a sick joke.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 5 days ago

mplane...Just take the incredible corruption in medicare and medicaid that they will do nothing about. Then they want ObamaCare which is far more money than medicare..the corruption beyond belief is guaranteed.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from mplane wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu, you are so right. Obamacare is the big new wing on the Mcmansion we can't afford. I'm 47, and pretty well resigned to working until I drop. I just want to be able to go fishing and hunting when I get the occasional day off. I've already enacted my own drastic austerity measures, and frankly I prefer a simple, spartan life. A lot of luxuries that people demand are just a hollow substitutes for real human experience anyway. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness cannot be realized at the shopping mall; nor can they be mailed to you by Uncle Sam.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

mplane...Very well stated.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

You can't reduce the government or fix our economy until you stop saddling the US taxpayer with the costs of the rest of the world's military defense. Medicare may be wasteful but it does have a dedicated revenue stream from our taxes. Same for Social Security (which is about $3Trillion in the black). But fight a couple of pointless wars and spend, for decades on end, ten times as much on global stabilization as every other nation and the only thing you can do is kill the US economy.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

Anything to keep the Bush tax cuts going for the "job creators".

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

If our state and federal government can no longer protect our lands and water due to more and more tax cuts and cuts to conservation funding, the future will be in land trusts (Land Trust Alliance, Nature Conservancy, Freshwater Trust, The Trust for Public Land etc.). I urge everyone to support their local land trusts. We're either going to have to start supporting them or just hand over our beloved lands to developers and industry because our government won't have the necessary funds to protect them. Also of importance, organizations that do water quality testing, stream management etc. Also, volunteering with fish & wildlife, dept of environmental conservation since they don't have the manpower anymore.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

oops- I meant to say budget cuts, not tax cuts. You get the point though..

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Funny how lots of folks won't kick in a dime, but are adamant about keeping a program going. It's the entitlement era in this country. What a lot of these programs depend on is a rich dude kicking in a bunch of his money, or willing a bunch of their money. Rich folks are being attacked as causing the problem. And now our Presidents campaign strategy is to NOT SUPPORT economic policy that needs to get done. He is hoping it will not get done so he can blame congress for not getting it done, and not himself as the problem. The problem is going to get worse without a doubt in my mind.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Congress gets the blame because they control the purse strings. As for the "rich" -- too many of them receive massive taxpayer subsidies in dozens of ways to earn any sympathy from me. Show me a fricking CEO or CFO drawing a bonus in the tens of millions, and I will show you an idiot whose company managed again to show zero profits, pay not taxes, fired 20,000 US citizens, and hired 40,000 commies, secure in the knowledge that the stuff he now makes overseas will travel safely to the US market in container ships registered in Panama and Greece, without threat of international militarism or pirates, thanks largely to the US taxpayer that pays for the US navy.

To heck with the super rich. I wouldn't cross the street to empty my bladder on Jeff Immelt if he was on fire. It'd be a waste of p*ss.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

I have zero sympathy for corporations and the wealthy elite. They've brought this upon themselves and have been anything but patriotic. Like the big-time corporate polluters Koch Brothers Industries and Halliburton doing business with Iranian companies. We continue to let these corporations do whatever they want in pursuit of profits. Tax breaks, lobbying to weaken and dismantle environmental protections, outsourcing etc. Yup, all in the name of "improving the economy" and jobs. What's next- are they going to come out and say child labor laws are bad for the economy? Maybe minimum wage should be set to $2 an hour. F that. Since I'm only one person, I don't have much say in anything. But what I will do this year is buy American-made products whenever I can (especially for the holiday season) and buy local.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Mike Diehl..You won't have to it appears...and a "rich" guy has been far lowered by the Obama Administration...the ones they are going after with higher taxes. Big difference between the super rich that pay no taxes...they fly around in their Lear Jets, and expense their incomes, and a 200K guy that gets a W-2...70% of the job creation are these guys, and they ain't gonna be hiring, or starting up new companies, or expanding their existing co.'s.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

And RealGoodMan. There are a million wealthy elite..John Kerry for instance that never had a real job in his life..just married wealth, and made 3 million bucks in the stock market insider trading several years ago. But the left wants to bring up these Koch Bros.??? Every leftist in the country talks about them. What liberal blog sent that message down to you guys? Move.ON.org probably.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 1 day ago

Here we go... Right right- so if we call out some corporations on selling out the American public or pushing to turn America's natural landscape into an industrial wasteland for a few quick bucks, we're automatically all "leftists." That's rational. Are only liberals allowed to criticize the Koch Brothers?

Because of partisan corporate apologists like yourself, these corporations aren't held accountable. Criticism of the Koch Brothers and similar companies should be universal for anyone that cares about conservation- it should be coming from all political sides.

I bring up the Koch Brothers because they're one of the largest polluters in this country and they're a major player in the XL pipeline- John Kerry isn't a corporate polluter. I don't know what the hell he has to do with anything in this conversation?

It's because of people like you that the environment and conservation are labeled a "liberal" issue. That hurts EVERYONE. Stop defending them and get real. Not all corporations are bad, there's plenty of responsible ones- but for the ones selling out America, they need a wake up call.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 1 day ago

Here we go... Right right- so if we call out some corporations on selling out the American public or pushing to turn America's natural landscape into an industrial wasteland for a few quick bucks, we're automatically all "leftists." That's rational. Are only liberals allowed to criticize the Koch Brothers?

Because of partisan corporate apologists like yourself, these corporations aren't held accountable. Criticism of the Koch Brothers and similar companies should be universal for anyone that cares about conservation- it should be coming from all political sides.

I bring up the Koch Brothers because they're one of the largest polluters in this country and they're a major player in the XL pipeline- John Kerry isn't a corporate polluter. I don't know what the hell he has to do with anything in this conversation?

It's because of people like you that the environment and conservation are labeled a "liberal" issue. That hurts EVERYONE. Stop defending them and get real. Not all corporations are bad, there's plenty of responsible ones- but for the ones selling out America, they need a wake up call.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 4 hours ago

He falls into the category of CRYBYs. Crap In Your Back Yard. Guys who'd sell out their neighbors for a quick buck, even if the people ultimately benefiting from it are Communists.

Rosemont Copper is one such organization. Bunch of people prostituting themselves to the People's Republic of China, and dumping the inevitable mess on the US Taxpayer.

Sometimes I wonder about some of these developers with which nation their loyalties are aligned. These days, alot of them seem like Chocolate Covered Cherries. Capitalist bottom line black on the outside, Chinese Commie pink in the middle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from WesternMassHole wrote 27 weeks 3 hours ago

I heard a story on the radio about the government testing a new unmanned missile/drone that can fly at speeds exceeding 3000 mph and can reach anywhere on the globe in under an hour and they succesfully tested it off of Hawaii. Only cost them $69 Million to do the test. Maybe scrap some of these government funded BS defense programs and allow programs that add to the economy to be left untouched.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

If our state and federal government can no longer protect our lands and water due to more and more tax cuts and cuts to conservation funding, the future will be in land trusts (Land Trust Alliance, Nature Conservancy, Freshwater Trust, The Trust for Public Land etc.). I urge everyone to support their local land trusts. We're either going to have to start supporting them or just hand over our beloved lands to developers and industry because our government won't have the necessary funds to protect them. Also of importance, organizations that do water quality testing, stream management etc. Also, volunteering with fish & wildlife, dept of environmental conservation since they don't have the manpower anymore.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Congress gets the blame because they control the purse strings. As for the "rich" -- too many of them receive massive taxpayer subsidies in dozens of ways to earn any sympathy from me. Show me a fricking CEO or CFO drawing a bonus in the tens of millions, and I will show you an idiot whose company managed again to show zero profits, pay not taxes, fired 20,000 US citizens, and hired 40,000 commies, secure in the knowledge that the stuff he now makes overseas will travel safely to the US market in container ships registered in Panama and Greece, without threat of international militarism or pirates, thanks largely to the US taxpayer that pays for the US navy.

To heck with the super rich. I wouldn't cross the street to empty my bladder on Jeff Immelt if he was on fire. It'd be a waste of p*ss.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

You can't reduce the government or fix our economy until you stop saddling the US taxpayer with the costs of the rest of the world's military defense. Medicare may be wasteful but it does have a dedicated revenue stream from our taxes. Same for Social Security (which is about $3Trillion in the black). But fight a couple of pointless wars and spend, for decades on end, ten times as much on global stabilization as every other nation and the only thing you can do is kill the US economy.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

I have zero sympathy for corporations and the wealthy elite. They've brought this upon themselves and have been anything but patriotic. Like the big-time corporate polluters Koch Brothers Industries and Halliburton doing business with Iranian companies. We continue to let these corporations do whatever they want in pursuit of profits. Tax breaks, lobbying to weaken and dismantle environmental protections, outsourcing etc. Yup, all in the name of "improving the economy" and jobs. What's next- are they going to come out and say child labor laws are bad for the economy? Maybe minimum wage should be set to $2 an hour. F that. Since I'm only one person, I don't have much say in anything. But what I will do this year is buy American-made products whenever I can (especially for the holiday season) and buy local.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 1 day ago

Here we go... Right right- so if we call out some corporations on selling out the American public or pushing to turn America's natural landscape into an industrial wasteland for a few quick bucks, we're automatically all "leftists." That's rational. Are only liberals allowed to criticize the Koch Brothers?

Because of partisan corporate apologists like yourself, these corporations aren't held accountable. Criticism of the Koch Brothers and similar companies should be universal for anyone that cares about conservation- it should be coming from all political sides.

I bring up the Koch Brothers because they're one of the largest polluters in this country and they're a major player in the XL pipeline- John Kerry isn't a corporate polluter. I don't know what the hell he has to do with anything in this conversation?

It's because of people like you that the environment and conservation are labeled a "liberal" issue. That hurts EVERYONE. Stop defending them and get real. Not all corporations are bad, there's plenty of responsible ones- but for the ones selling out America, they need a wake up call.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 26 weeks 4 hours ago

He falls into the category of CRYBYs. Crap In Your Back Yard. Guys who'd sell out their neighbors for a quick buck, even if the people ultimately benefiting from it are Communists.

Rosemont Copper is one such organization. Bunch of people prostituting themselves to the People's Republic of China, and dumping the inevitable mess on the US Taxpayer.

Sometimes I wonder about some of these developers with which nation their loyalties are aligned. These days, alot of them seem like Chocolate Covered Cherries. Capitalist bottom line black on the outside, Chinese Commie pink in the middle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

Anything to keep the Bush tax cuts going for the "job creators".

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 3 days ago

oops- I meant to say budget cuts, not tax cuts. You get the point though..

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RealGoodMan wrote 26 weeks 1 day ago

Here we go... Right right- so if we call out some corporations on selling out the American public or pushing to turn America's natural landscape into an industrial wasteland for a few quick bucks, we're automatically all "leftists." That's rational. Are only liberals allowed to criticize the Koch Brothers?

Because of partisan corporate apologists like yourself, these corporations aren't held accountable. Criticism of the Koch Brothers and similar companies should be universal for anyone that cares about conservation- it should be coming from all political sides.

I bring up the Koch Brothers because they're one of the largest polluters in this country and they're a major player in the XL pipeline- John Kerry isn't a corporate polluter. I don't know what the hell he has to do with anything in this conversation?

It's because of people like you that the environment and conservation are labeled a "liberal" issue. That hurts EVERYONE. Stop defending them and get real. Not all corporations are bad, there's plenty of responsible ones- but for the ones selling out America, they need a wake up call.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Muleynut30.06 wrote 27 weeks 1 hour ago

One little piece of good news is though Obama put off a descion on a massive pipeline that will run from the candian tar sands to the coast of Texas which would have caused unheard of environmental damage.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ancguy wrote 27 weeks 31 min ago

Well what exactly don't people understand about "Cut government spending?" Everyone seems to think that only the programs that don't affect them will be cut, and the ones they like are somehow exempt. Cutting taxes, reducing the size of government means everything's up for cuts. Unless your programs can afford expensive lobbyists who can in effect bribe important members of Congress, your pet programs are destined for the chopping block.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from mplane wrote 26 weeks 5 days ago

Medicare, medicaid, social security, and defense. These are the only real drivers of our budgetary problems. Medicare and medicaid alone are an impending disaster. We could nickle and dime away pretty much everything else, but without reforming the latter entitlement programs, we'll still be in exactly the same mess. Even if all funding for conservation could be eliminated, and all public hunting lands were sold off to raise revenue, it would still be like bailing a sinking ship with a teaspoon compared to the enormous leaks represented by medicare, medicaid, social security, and defense. We need our representatives to get real about the problem. They seem to think that fishing for quarters in the sofa cushions is going to pay the mortgage on a Mcmansion we can't afford! Reform the big entitlements, get defense down to reasonable levels and then let's talk. Until then, this whole process is a sick joke.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

mplane...Very well stated.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 27 weeks 5 hours ago

What I tell'ya? And this will continue for quite some time until decent, commonsense ECON 101 policy is enacted, and get back to expanding the tax base, increasing tax revenues rather than policy that is now SHRINKING our economy. Not even women, and children will be spared.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 5 days ago

mplane...Just take the incredible corruption in medicare and medicaid that they will do nothing about. Then they want ObamaCare which is far more money than medicare..the corruption beyond belief is guaranteed.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from mplane wrote 26 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu, you are so right. Obamacare is the big new wing on the Mcmansion we can't afford. I'm 47, and pretty well resigned to working until I drop. I just want to be able to go fishing and hunting when I get the occasional day off. I've already enacted my own drastic austerity measures, and frankly I prefer a simple, spartan life. A lot of luxuries that people demand are just a hollow substitutes for real human experience anyway. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness cannot be realized at the shopping mall; nor can they be mailed to you by Uncle Sam.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Funny how lots of folks won't kick in a dime, but are adamant about keeping a program going. It's the entitlement era in this country. What a lot of these programs depend on is a rich dude kicking in a bunch of his money, or willing a bunch of their money. Rich folks are being attacked as causing the problem. And now our Presidents campaign strategy is to NOT SUPPORT economic policy that needs to get done. He is hoping it will not get done so he can blame congress for not getting it done, and not himself as the problem. The problem is going to get worse without a doubt in my mind.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

And RealGoodMan. There are a million wealthy elite..John Kerry for instance that never had a real job in his life..just married wealth, and made 3 million bucks in the stock market insider trading several years ago. But the left wants to bring up these Koch Bros.??? Every leftist in the country talks about them. What liberal blog sent that message down to you guys? Move.ON.org probably.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 6 days ago

WesternMassHole...Rather interesting isn't it to watch two of Obama's extreme liberal groups battle it out for who has the most power. The far left environmentalists want all those pipeline, high paying union jobs shutdown, and the Unions are complaining to Obama that they are a huge contributor, and their union unemployment numbers are running around 16%. Who do you think is going to win? Private co. real jobs benefiting the economy, and lowering our debt?..or the environmentalists?

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Mike Diehl..You won't have to it appears...and a "rich" guy has been far lowered by the Obama Administration...the ones they are going after with higher taxes. Big difference between the super rich that pay no taxes...they fly around in their Lear Jets, and expense their incomes, and a 200K guy that gets a W-2...70% of the job creation are these guys, and they ain't gonna be hiring, or starting up new companies, or expanding their existing co.'s.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment