Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Conservation Update: The Sky Isn't Falling!

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Conservationist
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

March 14, 2012

Conservation Update: The Sky Isn't Falling!

By Bob Marshall

Covering conservation news recently has been like working the obituary beat at a newspaper: You spend your days reporting about good things passing away. And while that's not much fun to write about, I know some readers are tempted to quit and seek grief counseling.

That's why it's important to revisit the news from recent weeks. Not only was there a string of victories for conservationists, but sportsmen's groups played pivotal roles in many of them.

• The RESTORE Act passed a major hurdle in the Senate. If blessed by the House and signed by President Obama, this means 80 percent of Clean Water Act fines resulting from the Deepwater Horizon disaster will be spent on restoring the Gulf Coast that event damaged.

This is a huge victory for the Mississippi River delta, the engine that drives much of the Gulf ecosystem, yet has been near collapsing due to the impacts of levees for shipping and development and tens of thousands of miles of canal dredged for oil and gas development.

Sportsmen groups and the outdoors industry lobbied hard for this passage -- and got 72 votes in a Senate that typically offers fewer than 52 votes for anything.

• The Obama Administration found a way to fund an additional 1 million acres for upland and wetland habitat, reversing an earlier decisions that would have gutted programs like the Wetland Reserve and Grasslands Reserve -- and sportsmen played a major role in that.

• At the same time, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced it would be spending up to 70 percent of its prime wetlands protection money on the prairie potholes, a huge step for waterfowl.

• Finally, a federal appeals court sided with conservationists and rejected the Yazoo Pumps Project.

This project would have reversed the hard-won conservation efforts attempting to return that delta system -- long-battered by dredging and draining, yet still so important to fish and wildlife -- to its former glory.

You may have already read about some of this news, but the fact that reliable sources confirmed sportsmen's groups played pivotal roles in these victories is new in itself. It proves congressional contacts from individuals make a difference.

Staying informed and involved is not a waste of time -- no matter how much money the other side has.

Wanted Dead, NOT alive: The top 10 Invasive Species Wrecking U.S. Fish and Wildlife

With a poster saying "WANTED: Dead NOT Alive!" the group Wildlife Forever has issued the list of Top 10 Invasive Species damaging fish and wildlife in the U.S.:

1.) ZEBRA & QUAGGA MUSSELS WANTED DEAD for devastating the food chain, reducing fish populations, destroying spawning habitat, encrusting boats and docks, and wreaking havoc on equipment and on fishing.

2.) ASIAN CARP WANTED DEAD for taking over rivers and streams, replacing sport fish populations, impeding navigation and causing injury -- even possible death -- to boaters on the waters.

3.) CANADA THISTLE WANTED DEAD for choking out native prairie grasses and plants, providing no food value, driving deer, wild turkeys and other wildlife out of traditional habitat.

4.) HYDRILLA WANTED DEAD for limiting access for boating, fishing and waterfowl hunting, dense beds destroying sport fish spawning grounds, out competing native plants and, once mature, degrading fishing.

5.) BUCKTHORN WANTED DEAD for killing hardwood forests, eliminating native producing trees important to deer and turkey, choking woodland travel corridors and decreasing overall productive habitat.

6.) ROCK SNOT - DIDYMO WANTED DEAD for smothering food sources for trout and salmon, covering spawning habitat and insect life with ooze, wreaking havoc on fishing and access to fishable waters.

7.) EMERALD ASH BORER WANTED DEAD for destroying 100 million ash trees, creating loss of habitat and fire zones imperiling wildlife, humans and property. At stake are 7.5 billion trees.

8.) WHIRLING DISEASE WANTED DEAD for killing trout and salmon. When an infected fish's death occurs, millions of parasitic spores release back into the water, which are virtually indestructible, surviving for up to 30 years to kill again.

9.) FERAL HOGS WANTED DEAD for wanton destruction of habitat, consumption of acorns and denying essential food from deer, wild turkey and quail, eating eggs of ground nesting birds, killing fawns and maliciously uprooting riparian areas.

10.) PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE WANTED DEAD for eliminating productive fish and wildlife habitat to the tune of 500,000 acres of wetlands annually, offering no food value, reducing waterfowl nesting and fish nursery areas.

Grants Available for Community-based Habitat Restoration Projects

Sportsmen who see a conservation project in need of funding should check out a generous program for the FishAmerica Foundation that offers grants up to $75,000 for marine and anadromous sport fish habitat restoration projects along the coasts and Great Lakes.

Working with the Naitonal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the project targets community-based, non-profit organizations such as sportsmen's and conservation groups.

The Appplication deadline is April 30th. Complete details are available at www.FishAmerica.org.

Comments (2)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Steward wrote 2 years 5 weeks ago

I've been considering recently: It's very easy to be concerned about the Federal government and the decisions being made. This is appropriate, because the Federal government is too big and has too much power, which means they have incredible potential to do harm.

But how many of us know what our state or local governments might be doing that would affect our lives, and specifically, our outdoor/wilderness activities? It's a bit of a paradox: The further away the government is, the less direct influence we have, but the more we seem to know about it. The State and Local decisions are much closer, and we can have a lot more influence on the process, but do most of us know what's going on?

Something to consider...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moose1980 wrote 2 years 5 weeks ago

Steward, good point. State and local governments are important in conserving local lands etc. Most hunting and fishing management is done on the state level, so its important to get involved and know whats going on.

As far as the feds, I think the federal government certainly has its place in conservation and environmental issues mostly because many issues extend beyond state borders. Everything from pollution to migratory bird conservation extends beyond individual states. These types of things are what they should be getting involved in.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Moose1980 wrote 2 years 5 weeks ago

Steward, good point. State and local governments are important in conserving local lands etc. Most hunting and fishing management is done on the state level, so its important to get involved and know whats going on.

As far as the feds, I think the federal government certainly has its place in conservation and environmental issues mostly because many issues extend beyond state borders. Everything from pollution to migratory bird conservation extends beyond individual states. These types of things are what they should be getting involved in.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steward wrote 2 years 5 weeks ago

I've been considering recently: It's very easy to be concerned about the Federal government and the decisions being made. This is appropriate, because the Federal government is too big and has too much power, which means they have incredible potential to do harm.

But how many of us know what our state or local governments might be doing that would affect our lives, and specifically, our outdoor/wilderness activities? It's a bit of a paradox: The further away the government is, the less direct influence we have, but the more we seem to know about it. The State and Local decisions are much closer, and we can have a lot more influence on the process, but do most of us know what's going on?

Something to consider...

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment