Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Hurteau: How Would You Act On TV?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Whitetail 365
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

June 23, 2010

Hurteau: How Would You Act On TV?

By Dave Hurteau

Yesterday, I put up a post asking a simple question: “Who Is Your Least Favorite Celebrity Deer Hunter?”—which apparently touched a nerve. Far more than the average Joe, celebrity hunters represent all of us and our sport to the larger public. If it is fair to ask what practices and characteristics we like them to portray (essentially, who’s your favorite?) then its likewise reasonable to ask what we don’t want them putting forward (essentially, who’s your least favorite?).

A lot of you made smart, interesting observations. But, you gotta admit, it did turn into a bit of a celebrity bash session. I’ll take some of the heat for that; I could have phrased the question more clearly. But let’s be fair to the celebs—even the ones you don’t like—by considering a great point made by WesMcCormick, who wrote: “I don’t feel bad for these ‘celebrities’ nor will I make excuses for them, but I’m sure the same thing could happen to any of us given the opportunities these folks have.”

It’s easy to rip TV hunters. I’m sure I’ve done it myself. But I’m not sure I’d do much better in their shoes. Did you catch the post about the gobbler I called in for my brother-in-law this spring? I’m telling you, folks: If there’d been a camera on me when Geoff dropped that bird, I’d have looked like a complete @$$. I fist pumped. I said “Yesssssssss” about fourteen times. I even did the lawnmower—a little (see video below). I don’t think there’s anything wrong with what I did. It was 100-percent genuine. But if I’d done it on camera, someone would be telling me to act like I’ve been there before.

Comments (42)

Top Rated
All Comments
from WVOtter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Pure excitement can't, and maybe shouldn't, be contained; and some kills are more special than others. A hunter/fisherman works hard to take his game, and I don't take issue with rejoicing, if it doesn't disrepect the game (kissing it or slapping it's rump) or impede other hunters (you got yours, now let others in the woods get theirs). But many of the guys on TV shows are just like other reality show personalities; high maintanance and love putting on a show for the camera...the love of hunting has passed. They've harvested everything under the sun a dozen times and have $10K invested in gear and 5 times that to hunt juicy plots where a first year novice could get the shot they just did. Then when they celebrate their kill, well, I've seen better "faking it" in adult movies because all they cared about was getting the footage (notice how often that's the first question to the cameraman, "Did you get that?"), not the purity of the hunt.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from countitandone wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hurt...when it's genuine, fine. That first buck, gobbler, yote or bear you DRT on camera is raw emotion, not to be denied for anyone. But I have a problem with Tiffany and her rehearsed, pathetic "big buck" dialogue and non-genuine body language.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I agree with many of WVOtters points. I think the whole "hunting show" market is really suffering from overexposure and oversaturation.

After a while all these shows run together and the host/celebrihunters are looking for ways to differentiate themselves (and sell their wares).

Unfortunately, many of these folks are more like the Shamwow guy than Fred Bear........

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I was raised on Curt Gowdy and the American Sportsman. Lots of over the shoulder camera work and few cut-aways. Celebration consisted of a firm handshake and a pat on the dogs head and nobody was trying to sell me gadgets that no ones needs.

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from nitrojoe wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I don't need to hear about all their gadgets they used to bag that buck, when the best tool they had was money and that tall fence.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I don't think I have ever danced, high fived incessantly, or pumped the lawn mower, or hooted and hollered. I would hope that if I ever killed a real B&C elk or deer, I would not act like some of the giggling idiots on TV. Gray hair and beards does not wear well with giggling like a giddy school girl. See Stan Potts, Roger Raglin, et al. Good grief!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from finnyk wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I want to think that I would express satisfaction, relief and respect for the animal/hunt every time. BUT, being human I have to admit that, if I killed the biggest/best (animal of the hunt) in my life, I would probably be a little over the top for a minute or two - simply because 1) it's the biggest/best, and 2) I would have proof/documentation of everything that I did to make it happen. I'm not a really emotional guy, though; so my "over the top" might not even register when compared to the cheese factor of some of these guys' victory dances. I DEFINITELY wouldn't cry like I have seen a time or two, and I DEFINITELY wouldn't spend a lot of time posing for the camera. You really should make sure the camera shows that you shake the hand of the guide (if there is one). I would probably be seen to thank the good Lord, too, for the animal and the abilities (physical and strategic) to be successful. As for praising the manufacturers . . . I guess I would have to at least thank them if they were sponsors, but truthfully any gun of sufficient caliber will do, and that goes for just about everything else I can think of that would be used.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm not sure what I'd do. I've got a face for radio and a voice for print. Hopefully I'd be so focused on the hunt and the moment that I wouldn't think about it and I'd just be myself (unfortunately for any viewers). Otherwise there really wouldn't be a point in me being out there.
I imagine when you're sitting in a tripod blind overlooking a freshly corned service road, like some of our Saturday morning celebs, you have a lot of time to rehearse the moment.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from schwings wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

"celebrity hunters represent all of us and our sport to the larger public". It seems very few "Hunters" on TV shows represent the average hunter or sportsman. I sure would not want some of these "TV Hunters" representing me on anything hunting related. You asked the right question and got the truth from fellow hunters.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from OldDominionHunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

As hunters we can all identify the emotions (real or fake) displayed by the celebrity hunters. Yet it is important they realize we are not the only audience. Our way of life is under attack by forces both from within and out of our circle. When a celebrity "hunter" jjumps for joy and acts a complete fool moments after killing a magnificent animal, what do you think the antis are seeing? Most of us were brought into this fold by our fathers, grandfathers, uncles or brothers. The first rule...always RESPECT the animal, and thank it for its sacrifice. I can't remember the last time I saw ANY of them do that. Keep the crying, jumping, and wise crack sayings for the trailer or the camp.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I would love to watch a hunting show where the hunters are hunters, not paid actors, "Living the Dream!" representing a product, and the quarry without question is wild and lives in a national forest, not on some hobby farmers private 500 acre deer farm, fence or no fence. The problem is nobody has made one since the 60's and 70's and as Buckhunter mentioned it was called "The American Sportsman". I just hope the general public views these celebrity hunters the same way they view any other actor,as self serving imitators.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- How many hours do you spend on stand each year? Or, how much time do you spend in the off season, working to better your hunting area? I doubt nothing even close to what the Drurys, Lee and Tiffany and many other honest TV hosts do every year to get the footage they do. In the midwest we have no national forest and honestly I doubt you could even put a watchable show together under those conditions.If you dont represent a product(sponsors] you dont have a show. Around here all the farms are private, its what you do with yours, is what makes the differance.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Canned hunts and places not open the the public turn me off, if I can't go there why watch!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The biggest problem I see is the shows like Teds, Kieth Warrens and many others that try to pass off fenced deer hunts as free range hunts, put a bad taste in the average guys mouth.There is something to learn from the shows that showcase what they have been able to do with a farm despite not being fenced and haveing neighbors that may not have the same goals. My question I put to Walt and the others with his opinion, is what would you rather do, if your long lost uncle willed you his 500 acre farm in the midwest. Sell it and run,graze cattle and rape everything you can get off the land with modern farming practices, or turn it into a whitetail paradise and have a place to hunt with your family and friends forever, paying the real estate taxes and expenses with income from some paid hunters and a few video hunts. The days of knocking on doors for a place to hunt are gone. If you dont want to be stuck on over pressured public land forever you better do something about it, and quit putting down the people with enough forethought to make sure they are not on the outside looking in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

As for the question, how would you act on tv? Many years ago I saw myself doing the small part of guide getting the crew set up , and then the recovery footage for H.S. and N.A. whitetail and realized I need to stay behind the scene. It is alot harder than you can imagine to get a quality hunt from start to finish on video. Now I am more than happy to set up the hunt, run the video and track the deer, but I leave the on camera work to the pros.I have had some here that I would never invite back,mostly younger wanna-be types, but the guys that have been around awhile, I can assure you are as good of hunters as they come.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

i can't say that i ever got overly excited about a kill besides my first deer which happened to be an average 3x3. to me it was the biggest of the herd. i also hate it when these celebs make a kill and the only thing they are focused on is the antlers. makes me wonder how much they would love that rack if it was simply shoved up their a**!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WVOtter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hank, there is a difference between the topics of whether someone hunts public land vs. a stop & shop plot and whether someone displays character or not. To me, harvesting a big buck on one of these plots with a guide is like shooting fish in a barrel. The hunter has done no scouting all year long, the guide has. But truth be told, if I won such a trip in a raffle, I certainly would take it, but wouldn't feel like I earned anything in the end. The bigger point of this post is the hosts' character, which most seem to lack. They're better hunters than I'll ever hope to be, but that doesn't mean I envy the way they carry themselves in persuit of their version of the sport.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ckRich wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The foolishness of a few can hold large consequences for many. Just like can happen with the general public, we hunters can be quick to pass judgement on an entire group because of the poor judgement/lack of respect that a few members might display. While I agree with many of you in the fact that some outdoor shows lack a certain amount of couth, you cannot honestly say that all shows are alike. There are a few good shows out there that highlight good family values, respect for the hunt, and the comradery among hunting partners, not just the horns. Yes, the horns are talked about and celebrated. That is part of it. Just not ALL of it.

Maybe that's why I am a fan, because they reflect what I hold true to a hunt. Could I do it any better, or even just as well? I doubt it. As our comments have proven here and on the other post, this is a tough audience to please.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntnow wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The reason that I think Jim Shockey was mentioned optimistically in the first post is because; he projects a sincere enoyment in hunting, he demonstrates respect for the game, he tries to educate the viewer on skill/strategy, he works hard when he is in the field, and he gets his family involved. Maybe the socks he wears on his arms too. These are characteristics that I would try to emulate on television. When the cameras take the fun out of a beautiful sunrise and a quiet day in the woods, you can see it all over the hunter's face.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The real hunting show would be far more entertaining that the usual huckstering. Imagine the deer hunting camp, with profane old uncle fizzbin and dumb as a post cousin Irkle, doddering grampa phlegm, Jack Nimrod (one of the guys from the plant) and Iggy. The beat up old guns might range from Irkles last ditch Arisaka to Nimrods bubbaized 30-40 Krag. There would be beer, there might not be deer, the raccoons will raid the coolers and Irkle will shoot that skunk upwind of camp, despite desperate pleas to dissist, the pickup will break down, requiring a tow and a head gasket. Fashions will revolve around dirty beerlogo tee shirts, greasy jeans and Thrallmart copies of Carharts. Much of the hunting party will be too hung over to hunt for anything other than the toilet paper (which no one will have brought) in the morning, except for iggy the kid, who may bag the only deer of the event with his ancient Savage Super Single 12 gauge, while the adults are still staggering about looking for cigarettes and trying to make "cowboy coffee" in an old tin Billy. Iggy will of course become violently ill in the course of field dressing his prize which may be utterly bodged by the lack of a sharp knife.
And that would be "hunting show" enough.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from idduckhntr wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I would like to know what they do with all the deer and elk they harvest every year. Do they donate or what I am pretty sure a person cant eat 15 or 20 deer a year.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I like to see a show with both active and retired Military

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntnow wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm with Bella, that would be more entertaining than anything else on television. I've been in a few deer camps like that and they are fun, after they are over. You did forget the guy that always gets drunk and snores like a chainsaw and the poor fella that is too fat to get in a treestand and hunts from the truck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hurteau wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The best reaction I've ever seen on TV--and I can't remember the show--was when a young women openly sobbed after shooting her first elk. It was clearly genuine and seemed totally unexpected to her. She cried uncontrollably as she took in the weight of the moment and kept saying, "That's intense; that's intense." And that's right. Killing an animal is an intense, profound, weighty thing. I know guys who have killed dozens of deer yet still often cry after a kill. I know others who jump up and down like cheerleaders. It's highly personal. If you ask me, whatever comes naturally is fine, as long as it's not intentionally crass or disrespectful to the critter. As far as TV reactions go, I don't want to put myself in the position of guessing whether someone's reaction is genuine. But I'll say this. It sometimes doesn't come across well. Typically, all you see on a hunting show is the kill and the reaction, and so naturally it appears as though the reaction is to the kill specifically. Of course experienced hunters know it's much more than that. But that often doesn't come across on TV and can therefore give the wrong impression.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

It's hard to tell if the emotional antics are caused by their 10th or 15th huge buck of the year or the contract extension with the corporation to keep show and the paydays coming for another year. Either way it's sales and marketing-- Not Hunting.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Amen Buckhunter, I did too. Bing Crosby and Phil Harris were some of my favorites on that show. Their banter with each other hit of miss was wonderful. "Excellent shot Mr. Crosby. Why thank you Mr. Harris...", always working in dry humor. Good stuff!

As my old football coach told us with a line borrowed from Vince Lombardi, "Act like you have been there before." "Dignity is never out of fashion..."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I've given up trying to make sense of any of the reality shows.

The instant you turn the camera on, it isn't reality any more.

"Candid Camera" was the world's last reality show, barring security and Police cameras.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from muskiemaster wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I agree with clay cooper where he says that he enjoys shows that don't put the spotlight on the main person of the show but instead dedicate hunts to veterans or disabled people. Both Ted Nugent and Jim Zumbo do a good job of this and let that person experience something they might not have ever had a chance to.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Bella- I can only imagine the crap a show like you envisioned would create on this thread, or maybe thats the type of crowd most of these guys hunt with.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- why must you always cut on anyone who makes a career in the deer hunting industry?Do you have the same opinion of the columnists on this F&S site?I can only imagine what a pain in the ass you would be to share a camp with.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hank, you need to put a little more effort to this site than just attacking my posts. You'll never get past that one star ranking if you don't contribute something other than anger. If you think I'm gonna bow down and say that deer farming and corporate videos is what hunting is all about you can go suck an egg because it ain't happening pal!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- I dont expect you to ever come around to the real world. Most of us are not content hunting on overpressured public land, and want to make what we do have control of better. If we chose not to be cattle farmers and instead turn our land into a "deer farm" then who are you to look down your nose at us. You seem to think when a guy plants a food plot every deer in the country hits it like clockwork. Thats far from the truth. Alot of the time it gets even harder to kill a good buck when you have 20 different feeding areras but can only hunt one at a time. Deer around here have it to good, 70 percent unhunted sanctuaries and food everywhere. Not shooting fish in a barrel. Whitetail hunting is big business and most guys want to know how to get the most of their land. Get used to it or turn your tv off.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Oh yeah, I left out how Nimrod drops his rifle bolt down the outhouse and how Grampa Phlegm slips offn' the steps and twists his ankle or how Irkle puts his foot through the floor, knocks the stovepipe off the woodstove and fills the camp with smoke. I guess I just read too many columns by Patrick Mcmanus...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Whackdaddy wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm stunned and overwhelmed by the amount of savage jealousy harbored by my fellow hunters. Sounds like the only way to be liked as a hunting TV personality is to:

A. Never kill anything bigger than any of your viewers
B. Not have any sponsors or cool gear
C. Not react when you have a successful hunt
D. Not manage your land if you're blessed enough to have some
E. Don't use food sources to your advantage
F. Don't have a pretty wife
E. Accept no free hunts
F. Use none of your other talents to add entertainment to the show

Crapventures, airing next fall. Be sure to watch.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Whackdaddy- Good post.Seems that is what it would take to make Walt and the others approve, with their " thats not what hunting is about attitudes". Check out Kiskys hunting forum, if you want good information on manageing your deer herd, from people with the same goals.

-4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Someone is taking themselves way too seriously! LOL

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curt in Va. wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I have shot the three biggest bucks of my life in the last two years. The first one was in Texas with a good friend & guide. I was just in awe of the whole experience and those guys were more excited than I was. I just had a feeling of somplete satisfaction and was literally so emotional that I thanked God for the entire situation. I don't take those feelings lightly. THe last two, last year, I was by myself and had the same feeling. It was a humble feeling. I never have been a "high five" kinda guy, but I just ran over to the buck and was so thankful & pleased to be in that moment. I can't say how I'd be with a camera on me, but I can only imagine you could see "it" on my face and I would not need a big fist pumping scene or histionics to convey my feelings!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Bella, you mean to tell me those McManus stories weren't about real live events? I experienced a lot of similar episodes---so ridiculous and dumb I'd hesitate to tell anybody about them.

Oh, yeah, about the topic. Hunting shows have gone right near the bottom of my watching list, just above Bridezillas. I would like to see a (successful) hunt of my own taped just to see how my memory of it agreed with the actual event.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I rarely display emotion would and have thanked my hunting partners ( never had a guided hunt) for making it possible for me to get my limit of Pheasants or a good deer by paying for the gas,ammo and lunch or dinner if they drove their vehicle and a Hearty handshake. That is what I would do on TV also.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I am by myself when I make the kill and I thank the Lord above for giving me the health to hunt and to kill the animal and to be in the outdoors. I just sit in silence for quite some time admiring the animal reguardless of the rack it has large or small. After I get my animal back to camp and it is on the pole a handshake is about as crazy as it gets. That night after supper we relive our kills of the day over for all the guys. I get tired of hearing how great the TC guns are when I had $2400.00 of the junk and Jim Shockey says there is no other scope other than a Leopold and I know better and every other " TV Hunter" has to give you the complete list of all of the products that it takes to kill an animal on a high fenced area or a closed area where the average hunter cannot hunt. I guess there are alot of people who like to watch these shows or they would not be on TV. If no one liked them, the advertising dollars would dry up. I used to watch the Outdoor channel but now with the foremat it has and the BS it promotes it gives me more time to watch Fox news. The older I get the more I just appreciate being out in nature and being able to hunt and kill an animal in the wide open spaces. This is truly a gift of God.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cwhitehead wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

Bottom line the average Joe's family doesn't have hundreds of acres in the midwest. As a young kid I loved hunting shows now I only sit and wonder how much $ did they pay to kill a good deer. Thats all it is now. The more $ you got the bigger dear you have the opprotunity to kill.
Here's a Couple of Thoughts for Ya,
1) How many TV shows have you seen, that film and kill a "good" buck on public land in the southern US (MS, AL, TN) None. I now understand they are not any better at hunting they are better at having the $ It takes to pay for those huge deer.
2)How many time have you seen any of the host talk about how many deer his family eats a year. I have a personal friend that went on a Big time $ hunt and a filming crew was there. They kill 3 deer, took the hind quarters off one and left the other 2 behind for "anybody that wanted it". Thats not what hunting should be about.
P.S. Upper Sardis WMA, MS come hunt with us.....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

My hunting is so unlike the TV shows that I am not sure how I would react. I think it does a disservice in that young people watch these shows and then you take them to the woods and they think they are going to have their choice of huge racks to choose from in a half an hour. Most of my friends have hunted for thirty years or more for a few big deer... I know a lot of people who have hunted years and never killed a deer. The joy is in being in the woods and away from life as we normally know it. TV does not convey that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from buckhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I was raised on Curt Gowdy and the American Sportsman. Lots of over the shoulder camera work and few cut-aways. Celebration consisted of a firm handshake and a pat on the dogs head and nobody was trying to sell me gadgets that no ones needs.

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I agree with many of WVOtters points. I think the whole "hunting show" market is really suffering from overexposure and oversaturation.

After a while all these shows run together and the host/celebrihunters are looking for ways to differentiate themselves (and sell their wares).

Unfortunately, many of these folks are more like the Shamwow guy than Fred Bear........

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from schwings wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

"celebrity hunters represent all of us and our sport to the larger public". It seems very few "Hunters" on TV shows represent the average hunter or sportsman. I sure would not want some of these "TV Hunters" representing me on anything hunting related. You asked the right question and got the truth from fellow hunters.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from WVOtter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Pure excitement can't, and maybe shouldn't, be contained; and some kills are more special than others. A hunter/fisherman works hard to take his game, and I don't take issue with rejoicing, if it doesn't disrepect the game (kissing it or slapping it's rump) or impede other hunters (you got yours, now let others in the woods get theirs). But many of the guys on TV shows are just like other reality show personalities; high maintanance and love putting on a show for the camera...the love of hunting has passed. They've harvested everything under the sun a dozen times and have $10K invested in gear and 5 times that to hunt juicy plots where a first year novice could get the shot they just did. Then when they celebrate their kill, well, I've seen better "faking it" in adult movies because all they cared about was getting the footage (notice how often that's the first question to the cameraman, "Did you get that?"), not the purity of the hunt.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from nitrojoe wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I don't need to hear about all their gadgets they used to bag that buck, when the best tool they had was money and that tall fence.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from OldDominionHunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

As hunters we can all identify the emotions (real or fake) displayed by the celebrity hunters. Yet it is important they realize we are not the only audience. Our way of life is under attack by forces both from within and out of our circle. When a celebrity "hunter" jjumps for joy and acts a complete fool moments after killing a magnificent animal, what do you think the antis are seeing? Most of us were brought into this fold by our fathers, grandfathers, uncles or brothers. The first rule...always RESPECT the animal, and thank it for its sacrifice. I can't remember the last time I saw ANY of them do that. Keep the crying, jumping, and wise crack sayings for the trailer or the camp.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I don't think I have ever danced, high fived incessantly, or pumped the lawn mower, or hooted and hollered. I would hope that if I ever killed a real B&C elk or deer, I would not act like some of the giggling idiots on TV. Gray hair and beards does not wear well with giggling like a giddy school girl. See Stan Potts, Roger Raglin, et al. Good grief!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The real hunting show would be far more entertaining that the usual huckstering. Imagine the deer hunting camp, with profane old uncle fizzbin and dumb as a post cousin Irkle, doddering grampa phlegm, Jack Nimrod (one of the guys from the plant) and Iggy. The beat up old guns might range from Irkles last ditch Arisaka to Nimrods bubbaized 30-40 Krag. There would be beer, there might not be deer, the raccoons will raid the coolers and Irkle will shoot that skunk upwind of camp, despite desperate pleas to dissist, the pickup will break down, requiring a tow and a head gasket. Fashions will revolve around dirty beerlogo tee shirts, greasy jeans and Thrallmart copies of Carharts. Much of the hunting party will be too hung over to hunt for anything other than the toilet paper (which no one will have brought) in the morning, except for iggy the kid, who may bag the only deer of the event with his ancient Savage Super Single 12 gauge, while the adults are still staggering about looking for cigarettes and trying to make "cowboy coffee" in an old tin Billy. Iggy will of course become violently ill in the course of field dressing his prize which may be utterly bodged by the lack of a sharp knife.
And that would be "hunting show" enough.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from countitandone wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hurt...when it's genuine, fine. That first buck, gobbler, yote or bear you DRT on camera is raw emotion, not to be denied for anyone. But I have a problem with Tiffany and her rehearsed, pathetic "big buck" dialogue and non-genuine body language.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hurteau wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The best reaction I've ever seen on TV--and I can't remember the show--was when a young women openly sobbed after shooting her first elk. It was clearly genuine and seemed totally unexpected to her. She cried uncontrollably as she took in the weight of the moment and kept saying, "That's intense; that's intense." And that's right. Killing an animal is an intense, profound, weighty thing. I know guys who have killed dozens of deer yet still often cry after a kill. I know others who jump up and down like cheerleaders. It's highly personal. If you ask me, whatever comes naturally is fine, as long as it's not intentionally crass or disrespectful to the critter. As far as TV reactions go, I don't want to put myself in the position of guessing whether someone's reaction is genuine. But I'll say this. It sometimes doesn't come across well. Typically, all you see on a hunting show is the kill and the reaction, and so naturally it appears as though the reaction is to the kill specifically. Of course experienced hunters know it's much more than that. But that often doesn't come across on TV and can therefore give the wrong impression.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hank, you need to put a little more effort to this site than just attacking my posts. You'll never get past that one star ranking if you don't contribute something other than anger. If you think I'm gonna bow down and say that deer farming and corporate videos is what hunting is all about you can go suck an egg because it ain't happening pal!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm not sure what I'd do. I've got a face for radio and a voice for print. Hopefully I'd be so focused on the hunt and the moment that I wouldn't think about it and I'd just be myself (unfortunately for any viewers). Otherwise there really wouldn't be a point in me being out there.
I imagine when you're sitting in a tripod blind overlooking a freshly corned service road, like some of our Saturday morning celebs, you have a lot of time to rehearse the moment.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Amen Buckhunter, I did too. Bing Crosby and Phil Harris were some of my favorites on that show. Their banter with each other hit of miss was wonderful. "Excellent shot Mr. Crosby. Why thank you Mr. Harris...", always working in dry humor. Good stuff!

As my old football coach told us with a line borrowed from Vince Lombardi, "Act like you have been there before." "Dignity is never out of fashion..."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I've given up trying to make sense of any of the reality shows.

The instant you turn the camera on, it isn't reality any more.

"Candid Camera" was the world's last reality show, barring security and Police cameras.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from finnyk wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I want to think that I would express satisfaction, relief and respect for the animal/hunt every time. BUT, being human I have to admit that, if I killed the biggest/best (animal of the hunt) in my life, I would probably be a little over the top for a minute or two - simply because 1) it's the biggest/best, and 2) I would have proof/documentation of everything that I did to make it happen. I'm not a really emotional guy, though; so my "over the top" might not even register when compared to the cheese factor of some of these guys' victory dances. I DEFINITELY wouldn't cry like I have seen a time or two, and I DEFINITELY wouldn't spend a lot of time posing for the camera. You really should make sure the camera shows that you shake the hand of the guide (if there is one). I would probably be seen to thank the good Lord, too, for the animal and the abilities (physical and strategic) to be successful. As for praising the manufacturers . . . I guess I would have to at least thank them if they were sponsors, but truthfully any gun of sufficient caliber will do, and that goes for just about everything else I can think of that would be used.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

It's hard to tell if the emotional antics are caused by their 10th or 15th huge buck of the year or the contract extension with the corporation to keep show and the paydays coming for another year. Either way it's sales and marketing-- Not Hunting.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Someone is taking themselves way too seriously! LOL

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

i can't say that i ever got overly excited about a kill besides my first deer which happened to be an average 3x3. to me it was the biggest of the herd. i also hate it when these celebs make a kill and the only thing they are focused on is the antlers. makes me wonder how much they would love that rack if it was simply shoved up their a**!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Oh yeah, I left out how Nimrod drops his rifle bolt down the outhouse and how Grampa Phlegm slips offn' the steps and twists his ankle or how Irkle puts his foot through the floor, knocks the stovepipe off the woodstove and fills the camp with smoke. I guess I just read too many columns by Patrick Mcmanus...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Whackdaddy wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm stunned and overwhelmed by the amount of savage jealousy harbored by my fellow hunters. Sounds like the only way to be liked as a hunting TV personality is to:

A. Never kill anything bigger than any of your viewers
B. Not have any sponsors or cool gear
C. Not react when you have a successful hunt
D. Not manage your land if you're blessed enough to have some
E. Don't use food sources to your advantage
F. Don't have a pretty wife
E. Accept no free hunts
F. Use none of your other talents to add entertainment to the show

Crapventures, airing next fall. Be sure to watch.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from muskiemaster wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I agree with clay cooper where he says that he enjoys shows that don't put the spotlight on the main person of the show but instead dedicate hunts to veterans or disabled people. Both Ted Nugent and Jim Zumbo do a good job of this and let that person experience something they might not have ever had a chance to.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I rarely display emotion would and have thanked my hunting partners ( never had a guided hunt) for making it possible for me to get my limit of Pheasants or a good deer by paying for the gas,ammo and lunch or dinner if they drove their vehicle and a Hearty handshake. That is what I would do on TV also.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntnow wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The reason that I think Jim Shockey was mentioned optimistically in the first post is because; he projects a sincere enoyment in hunting, he demonstrates respect for the game, he tries to educate the viewer on skill/strategy, he works hard when he is in the field, and he gets his family involved. Maybe the socks he wears on his arms too. These are characteristics that I would try to emulate on television. When the cameras take the fun out of a beautiful sunrise and a quiet day in the woods, you can see it all over the hunter's face.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntnow wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I'm with Bella, that would be more entertaining than anything else on television. I've been in a few deer camps like that and they are fun, after they are over. You did forget the guy that always gets drunk and snores like a chainsaw and the poor fella that is too fat to get in a treestand and hunts from the truck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I am by myself when I make the kill and I thank the Lord above for giving me the health to hunt and to kill the animal and to be in the outdoors. I just sit in silence for quite some time admiring the animal reguardless of the rack it has large or small. After I get my animal back to camp and it is on the pole a handshake is about as crazy as it gets. That night after supper we relive our kills of the day over for all the guys. I get tired of hearing how great the TC guns are when I had $2400.00 of the junk and Jim Shockey says there is no other scope other than a Leopold and I know better and every other " TV Hunter" has to give you the complete list of all of the products that it takes to kill an animal on a high fenced area or a closed area where the average hunter cannot hunt. I guess there are alot of people who like to watch these shows or they would not be on TV. If no one liked them, the advertising dollars would dry up. I used to watch the Outdoor channel but now with the foremat it has and the BS it promotes it gives me more time to watch Fox news. The older I get the more I just appreciate being out in nature and being able to hunt and kill an animal in the wide open spaces. This is truly a gift of God.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curt in Va. wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I have shot the three biggest bucks of my life in the last two years. The first one was in Texas with a good friend & guide. I was just in awe of the whole experience and those guys were more excited than I was. I just had a feeling of somplete satisfaction and was literally so emotional that I thanked God for the entire situation. I don't take those feelings lightly. THe last two, last year, I was by myself and had the same feeling. It was a humble feeling. I never have been a "high five" kinda guy, but I just ran over to the buck and was so thankful & pleased to be in that moment. I can't say how I'd be with a camera on me, but I can only imagine you could see "it" on my face and I would not need a big fist pumping scene or histionics to convey my feelings!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I would love to watch a hunting show where the hunters are hunters, not paid actors, "Living the Dream!" representing a product, and the quarry without question is wild and lives in a national forest, not on some hobby farmers private 500 acre deer farm, fence or no fence. The problem is nobody has made one since the 60's and 70's and as Buckhunter mentioned it was called "The American Sportsman". I just hope the general public views these celebrity hunters the same way they view any other actor,as self serving imitators.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from idduckhntr wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I would like to know what they do with all the deer and elk they harvest every year. Do they donate or what I am pretty sure a person cant eat 15 or 20 deer a year.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WVOtter wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Hank, there is a difference between the topics of whether someone hunts public land vs. a stop & shop plot and whether someone displays character or not. To me, harvesting a big buck on one of these plots with a guide is like shooting fish in a barrel. The hunter has done no scouting all year long, the guide has. But truth be told, if I won such a trip in a raffle, I certainly would take it, but wouldn't feel like I earned anything in the end. The bigger point of this post is the hosts' character, which most seem to lack. They're better hunters than I'll ever hope to be, but that doesn't mean I envy the way they carry themselves in persuit of their version of the sport.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from country road wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Bella, you mean to tell me those McManus stories weren't about real live events? I experienced a lot of similar episodes---so ridiculous and dumb I'd hesitate to tell anybody about them.

Oh, yeah, about the topic. Hunting shows have gone right near the bottom of my watching list, just above Bridezillas. I would like to see a (successful) hunt of my own taped just to see how my memory of it agreed with the actual event.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ckRich wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The foolishness of a few can hold large consequences for many. Just like can happen with the general public, we hunters can be quick to pass judgement on an entire group because of the poor judgement/lack of respect that a few members might display. While I agree with many of you in the fact that some outdoor shows lack a certain amount of couth, you cannot honestly say that all shows are alike. There are a few good shows out there that highlight good family values, respect for the hunt, and the comradery among hunting partners, not just the horns. Yes, the horns are talked about and celebrated. That is part of it. Just not ALL of it.

Maybe that's why I am a fan, because they reflect what I hold true to a hunt. Could I do it any better, or even just as well? I doubt it. As our comments have proven here and on the other post, this is a tough audience to please.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Canned hunts and places not open the the public turn me off, if I can't go there why watch!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

I like to see a show with both active and retired Military

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

My hunting is so unlike the TV shows that I am not sure how I would react. I think it does a disservice in that young people watch these shows and then you take them to the woods and they think they are going to have their choice of huge racks to choose from in a half an hour. Most of my friends have hunted for thirty years or more for a few big deer... I know a lot of people who have hunted years and never killed a deer. The joy is in being in the woods and away from life as we normally know it. TV does not convey that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

The biggest problem I see is the shows like Teds, Kieth Warrens and many others that try to pass off fenced deer hunts as free range hunts, put a bad taste in the average guys mouth.There is something to learn from the shows that showcase what they have been able to do with a farm despite not being fenced and haveing neighbors that may not have the same goals. My question I put to Walt and the others with his opinion, is what would you rather do, if your long lost uncle willed you his 500 acre farm in the midwest. Sell it and run,graze cattle and rape everything you can get off the land with modern farming practices, or turn it into a whitetail paradise and have a place to hunt with your family and friends forever, paying the real estate taxes and expenses with income from some paid hunters and a few video hunts. The days of knocking on doors for a place to hunt are gone. If you dont want to be stuck on over pressured public land forever you better do something about it, and quit putting down the people with enough forethought to make sure they are not on the outside looking in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

As for the question, how would you act on tv? Many years ago I saw myself doing the small part of guide getting the crew set up , and then the recovery footage for H.S. and N.A. whitetail and realized I need to stay behind the scene. It is alot harder than you can imagine to get a quality hunt from start to finish on video. Now I am more than happy to set up the hunt, run the video and track the deer, but I leave the on camera work to the pros.I have had some here that I would never invite back,mostly younger wanna-be types, but the guys that have been around awhile, I can assure you are as good of hunters as they come.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Bella- I can only imagine the crap a show like you envisioned would create on this thread, or maybe thats the type of crowd most of these guys hunt with.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from cwhitehead wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

Bottom line the average Joe's family doesn't have hundreds of acres in the midwest. As a young kid I loved hunting shows now I only sit and wonder how much $ did they pay to kill a good deer. Thats all it is now. The more $ you got the bigger dear you have the opprotunity to kill.
Here's a Couple of Thoughts for Ya,
1) How many TV shows have you seen, that film and kill a "good" buck on public land in the southern US (MS, AL, TN) None. I now understand they are not any better at hunting they are better at having the $ It takes to pay for those huge deer.
2)How many time have you seen any of the host talk about how many deer his family eats a year. I have a personal friend that went on a Big time $ hunt and a filming crew was there. They kill 3 deer, took the hind quarters off one and left the other 2 behind for "anybody that wanted it". Thats not what hunting should be about.
P.S. Upper Sardis WMA, MS come hunt with us.....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- How many hours do you spend on stand each year? Or, how much time do you spend in the off season, working to better your hunting area? I doubt nothing even close to what the Drurys, Lee and Tiffany and many other honest TV hosts do every year to get the footage they do. In the midwest we have no national forest and honestly I doubt you could even put a watchable show together under those conditions.If you dont represent a product(sponsors] you dont have a show. Around here all the farms are private, its what you do with yours, is what makes the differance.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- I dont expect you to ever come around to the real world. Most of us are not content hunting on overpressured public land, and want to make what we do have control of better. If we chose not to be cattle farmers and instead turn our land into a "deer farm" then who are you to look down your nose at us. You seem to think when a guy plants a food plot every deer in the country hits it like clockwork. Thats far from the truth. Alot of the time it gets even harder to kill a good buck when you have 20 different feeding areras but can only hunt one at a time. Deer around here have it to good, 70 percent unhunted sanctuaries and food everywhere. Not shooting fish in a barrel. Whitetail hunting is big business and most guys want to know how to get the most of their land. Get used to it or turn your tv off.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Walt- why must you always cut on anyone who makes a career in the deer hunting industry?Do you have the same opinion of the columnists on this F&S site?I can only imagine what a pain in the ass you would be to share a camp with.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hank111 wrote 1 year 48 weeks ago

Whackdaddy- Good post.Seems that is what it would take to make Walt and the others approve, with their " thats not what hunting is about attitudes". Check out Kiskys hunting forum, if you want good information on manageing your deer herd, from people with the same goals.

-4 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment