


January 23, 2012
British Outdoorsman Attempting 1-Year Survival Challenge Found Dead in Scotland
By Chad Love

A British survival enthusiast attempting to live off the land for a full year was recently found dead in Scotland.
From this story in the (UK) Daily Mail (hat tip to the Southern Rockies Nature Blog for the find):
A man found dead in a remote mountain hut was an adventurer who had planned a year-long Bear Grylls-style survival challenge in the Scottish wilderness. David Austin, 29, from Derby, was found dead in a 'bothy' by a track worker near Corrour, a remote railway station in Highland Perthshire, on December 31 at 9.50am. His body is believed to have been lying there for several weeks when it was discovered. A post-mortem found there were no suspicious circumstances behind his death, which is understood to have been as a result of hypothermia.
In November, Mr Austin had told his family he was heading north to live rough off the land - something for which survival expert Bear Grylls has become famous. He is believed to have attended several courses in outdoor survival and bushcraft skills over the past couple of years in order to realise his dream, despite being urged by family and friends to reconsider his plans. It is thought Mr Austin had not even taken a mobile phone with him, leaving him entirely at the mercy of the harsh winter. A number of personal possessions including a knife and a daily journal were found next to his body.
We all like to think we're consummate outdoorsmen and that we'd survive where less experienced others wouldn't, but are we really? Putting aside the question of whether this was a smart thing to do in the first place, do you think you'd fare any better in the same situation?
Comments (19)
If necessary I could survive for a short time but after a certain time frame passed I would most likely not make it. But this tragedy just goes to show you that even people who know what they’re doing can let things go too far. My prayers are with the family.
I'm with Fox on this one. I think setting the timeframe for it is handicapping yourself and stacking the odds against you. There are a lot of readers on this sight, who are more comfortable and competent in the woods than the average person. Some of them extremely so. However deciding that "I won't come in out of the cold for a year." Basically means that you are not surviving for rescue and that you will make decisions that are not the best. You have decided that certain opportunities to better your chances and end the survival portion of your ordeal will not be taken. That's not a test of your survival skills, which are generally considered to be the ability to stay alive long enough to be rescued, or self rescue. That's a year of primitive living. It's a tall order without expedition gear. A knife and a logbook would not allow me to do that.
In short, NO. I think there was a comment made by writer for I think F&S every one of us fancys himself a Davey Crockett at lease a little bit. Survival is not easy in harsh conditions, if it was everyone would make it out allive. Condolences to the family.
I made a conscious decision a long time ago to live indoors and haven't changed my mind yet and I doubt that I ever will. My idea of survival is going to the hunting camp for a week with plenty of supplies.
In a situation like this, you have know what you're doing, not just 'think' you know. You have to know when to call it quits. A fanciful dream to survive in the wilderness for a year, & it would have been a big feather in his cap.
I believe i could survive for a week or two using the skills that were passed down to me from my father and my grandfather, but a year? Highly, highly doubtful.
All the survival classes & courses in the world will not help you once you realize Ma Nature is holding all the cards. (She knows you're bluffing.)
Yes.
The key is that he wanted to live in the outdoors for a year, not survive. If I was planning on going to live for a year primativly then yes i think that I could prepare myself for that, but with that comes the ability to see and recognize danger and things that are out of my hands. now servival is not about living a comfortable life its about doing whatever it takes to stay alive and move on and be alive when you get rescued. as many of you have said for the time needed to be rescued yes I could, but I also would not set myself up to fail if my plan was to be there for a year.
Personally, I'm curious what we could learn from his journal; it may provide some insights into where he went wrong or how to better prepare for such a thing.
Condolences to the family.
In my mind survival incorporates doing everything I can to be rescued, not avoid it. I'm far more impressed with those who find themselves in a bad situation (not look for it) and are able to do what is necessary to make it out. Case in point, the Chilean rugby team in the 70's, I think it was. If that was a goal this man had, more power to him, but his enthusiasm for it meant he skipped some vital steps - like "surviving" for a year in an environment a little less taxing. His attempt would be more toward the top of "most difficult survival situations" list. Tragic and unnecessary.
As has been mentioned, this was a year of living primitively, not a year of survival. True woodcraft requires a lot more than a few classes. But taking a few classes may give someone enough false confidence to believe they know what they're doing, when, in fact, a good deal of experience is also required. I doubt there are very many such classes that make that distinction.
the old highland scots were a bunch of tough s.o.bs. they lived the same primitive lifestyle, not for just a year, but for their entire lives. sure, some died early, but as a group, they survived. many to unbelievably old ages. (they didn't have cell phones either.)
reminds me of the Donner Party great movie (based on true story) is one of survival and a must watch. very sad!
Sorry, but this is Darwinism at its finest.
I don' know exactly what his situation was, but in a different time, place and probably different situation: done that.
A lot of years later, I've come to realize that general health and well being can change radically and overnight change your chance of survival. Perhaps there was a physical reason that this life was ended early.
"Don't (willingly) try this at home" should be the disclaimer on all of the survivor shows. I love the notion that I can make it "in the woods" for an extended period of time, but realize I have a lot of shortcomings. I will enjoy the great outdoors a few days at a time.
the folks who live alone and isolated in arctic regions never stop preparing for the wintertime. They also start the cold season with enough supplies to winter over. None of them intend to forage daily for subsistance. especially in the wintertime when most of your resources are buried in snow and/or frozen down.
I've wanted to try the same thing, but never have. I've heard of plenty of people doing this in the wilds of Alaska. Going out and living, but they don't do it for a challenge its a way of life for them.
As for me... No I couldn't. I would miss applebees at some point. But I've dreampt about it non the less.
I truly hope his family finds some peace.
I think more than anything this story shows that survival is not guaranteed even for those who know what they are doing. Prepping for a survival situation is key. Making a plan, and pulling together survival supplies is the only way to make it. If you are looking to prepare, I found a good website at https://www.patriotprovisions.com.
True adventurer, but very dangerous. For myself, I would have brought backup food, fire starters, etc. in case my skills were not hacking it. At the very least satellite phone.
Post a Comment
If necessary I could survive for a short time but after a certain time frame passed I would most likely not make it. But this tragedy just goes to show you that even people who know what they’re doing can let things go too far. My prayers are with the family.
Personally, I'm curious what we could learn from his journal; it may provide some insights into where he went wrong or how to better prepare for such a thing.
Condolences to the family.
"Don't (willingly) try this at home" should be the disclaimer on all of the survivor shows. I love the notion that I can make it "in the woods" for an extended period of time, but realize I have a lot of shortcomings. I will enjoy the great outdoors a few days at a time.
I'm with Fox on this one. I think setting the timeframe for it is handicapping yourself and stacking the odds against you. There are a lot of readers on this sight, who are more comfortable and competent in the woods than the average person. Some of them extremely so. However deciding that "I won't come in out of the cold for a year." Basically means that you are not surviving for rescue and that you will make decisions that are not the best. You have decided that certain opportunities to better your chances and end the survival portion of your ordeal will not be taken. That's not a test of your survival skills, which are generally considered to be the ability to stay alive long enough to be rescued, or self rescue. That's a year of primitive living. It's a tall order without expedition gear. A knife and a logbook would not allow me to do that.
In short, NO. I think there was a comment made by writer for I think F&S every one of us fancys himself a Davey Crockett at lease a little bit. Survival is not easy in harsh conditions, if it was everyone would make it out allive. Condolences to the family.
I made a conscious decision a long time ago to live indoors and haven't changed my mind yet and I doubt that I ever will. My idea of survival is going to the hunting camp for a week with plenty of supplies.
The key is that he wanted to live in the outdoors for a year, not survive. If I was planning on going to live for a year primativly then yes i think that I could prepare myself for that, but with that comes the ability to see and recognize danger and things that are out of my hands. now servival is not about living a comfortable life its about doing whatever it takes to stay alive and move on and be alive when you get rescued. as many of you have said for the time needed to be rescued yes I could, but I also would not set myself up to fail if my plan was to be there for a year.
In my mind survival incorporates doing everything I can to be rescued, not avoid it. I'm far more impressed with those who find themselves in a bad situation (not look for it) and are able to do what is necessary to make it out. Case in point, the Chilean rugby team in the 70's, I think it was. If that was a goal this man had, more power to him, but his enthusiasm for it meant he skipped some vital steps - like "surviving" for a year in an environment a little less taxing. His attempt would be more toward the top of "most difficult survival situations" list. Tragic and unnecessary.
As has been mentioned, this was a year of living primitively, not a year of survival. True woodcraft requires a lot more than a few classes. But taking a few classes may give someone enough false confidence to believe they know what they're doing, when, in fact, a good deal of experience is also required. I doubt there are very many such classes that make that distinction.
Sorry, but this is Darwinism at its finest.
In a situation like this, you have know what you're doing, not just 'think' you know. You have to know when to call it quits. A fanciful dream to survive in the wilderness for a year, & it would have been a big feather in his cap.
I believe i could survive for a week or two using the skills that were passed down to me from my father and my grandfather, but a year? Highly, highly doubtful.
All the survival classes & courses in the world will not help you once you realize Ma Nature is holding all the cards. (She knows you're bluffing.)
Yes.
the old highland scots were a bunch of tough s.o.bs. they lived the same primitive lifestyle, not for just a year, but for their entire lives. sure, some died early, but as a group, they survived. many to unbelievably old ages. (they didn't have cell phones either.)
reminds me of the Donner Party great movie (based on true story) is one of survival and a must watch. very sad!
I don' know exactly what his situation was, but in a different time, place and probably different situation: done that.
A lot of years later, I've come to realize that general health and well being can change radically and overnight change your chance of survival. Perhaps there was a physical reason that this life was ended early.
the folks who live alone and isolated in arctic regions never stop preparing for the wintertime. They also start the cold season with enough supplies to winter over. None of them intend to forage daily for subsistance. especially in the wintertime when most of your resources are buried in snow and/or frozen down.
I've wanted to try the same thing, but never have. I've heard of plenty of people doing this in the wilds of Alaska. Going out and living, but they don't do it for a challenge its a way of life for them.
As for me... No I couldn't. I would miss applebees at some point. But I've dreampt about it non the less.
I truly hope his family finds some peace.
I think more than anything this story shows that survival is not guaranteed even for those who know what they are doing. Prepping for a survival situation is key. Making a plan, and pulling together survival supplies is the only way to make it. If you are looking to prepare, I found a good website at https://www.patriotprovisions.com.
True adventurer, but very dangerous. For myself, I would have brought backup food, fire starters, etc. in case my skills were not hacking it. At the very least satellite phone.
Post a Comment