Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

900lb Mako Shark Breaks the Scale at Marina del Rey

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

July 06, 2012

900lb Mako Shark Breaks the Scale at Marina del Rey

By Chad Love

When the fish you bring back to the dock is so heavy it breaks the scale at the marina, you know it's a big one. That's what happened with a group of California anglers who recently landed a 900 lb. mako in the waters off Marina Del Ray.

From this story on nbclosangeles.com:

A monster of the sea was killed and brought in to Marina del Rey – a shark so heavy that it damaged the brand-new scale at the dock. The 900-pound shark took some eight men to lift it out of the water Monday afternoon at Del Rey Landing, the marina's general manager said. "Our digital scale goes to 750, and it was bent before half of the shark was off the ground," said General Manager Craig Campbell, who was present when the giant shark was brought in.

The fishermen's battle at sea with the shark broke the on-boat equipment as well, Campbell said. The fishermen had to tow the shark back to the marina because it was too heavy to pull aboard, he said.

A fish of a lifetime, to be sure, but the catch has apparently sparked quite a bit of controversy over whether such a rare fish should have been killed or released. What do you think? If you caught a giant, once-in-a-lifetime fish, what would you do?

Comments (32)

Top Rated
All Comments
from The White Slug wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

That's at least 10-12 pups that won't be born (probably more for such a huge fish). Big makos taste like poop anyway.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from conway wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

A good case for changing the take regulations on pelagic sharks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

cut it loose. take plenty of pictures and go for the release certificate. as others have said a big breeder female like that needs to be released.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ron Wagner wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Mixed emotions. Nice to be able to bring in and weigh. How about all the fish that this Mako and its progeny would have eaten and taken off of dinner tables? Catch and release is usually best if you are not going to eat the fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from stvncts wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

So what was the point of killing it? They aren't good ot eat...they certainly were not going to mount it...This is what gives sport fishermen a bad name...we waste destroy our resources and then wonder why there is such a backlash against fishing and hunting...I am a big proponent of you eat what you catch and kill...otherwise find another outlet for your blood lust...

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from JETurner64 wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Certainly catch and release a great conservation tool for the species and our fellow man to enjoy the outdoors as we have. She is a magnificent spectacle of her species and a sight to behold. All who see her should appreciate her. Do we KNOW she did not end up as table fair? That's a LOT of fish to feed many people. Fish (and all the other critters I/we pursue) are mostly excellent table fair in the right hands. My father taught me early on all game/fish taken were to be eaten, period. What's the more, we live in a country in which the freedom to choose along with the right to voice our opinions was fought and died for. We all get to choose... We should choose well, both in word and deed, as we seek to support our past times, our fellow sportsmen, and our environment....j

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Raccoon Creeker wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

definitely release, any trophy fish deserves it

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott Hood wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Take a picture and let'em go. I have a picture of a Mako (7 footer) on the wall in my office ... it's wonderful to think it's still out there somewhere!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I would have let her go. Just the experience & the memory of such a catch is more than enough.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff O'Connor wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I'm a softy for fish so I would've released it. It sure is impressive though.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Remaxman wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

RELEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from cinjer wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Cut her loose. We are loosing so many top predators in the oceans, with fin soup. etc. They call it sport fishing.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from baiello wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I'm kind of old school in the fact that I love to eat my catch. Obviously catching and killing any fish for nothing more than a photo opp is wasteful. I'm kind of on the fence about this one. The size alone would provide more than anyone could eat in a year. I love Mako steaks and if this fish was divided among crew and/or donated to a food kitchen I have no problem with not releasing. There are so few once in a lifetime moments like this that I don't think it would decimate the population to keep it. I feel that fishing solely for the sport of it (catch and release) serves only to pump up the ego and without actually eating some of the catch it seems unnecessary to chance killing countless fish just for the thrill of it. Maybe somewhere in between would be a good balance. The all catch and release martyrs kind of make my stomach turn.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael McGraw wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Japan has done enough to kill the worlds oceans. Release her and alow her to continue breeding. Someone needs to help when so many are hurting.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from smdmz wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

That was one of the most beautiful paragraph I've ever read on these comment threads.. well said, JETurner64... For me, I tend to lean toward catch & release. As others have alluded to, I think more info is needed here to make any sort of real judgement on these fishermen. That being said, the Mako population/consumption worldwide is quite hard to keep tabs on and regulate, so I think with that in mind these guys maybe should've let this one go. Still love me a good fresh fillet...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Shane Kovash wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

If in fact it will not be eaten, I would have let it go also. I love to bring home a big trophy but only when I am going to stock my freezer as well. I don't hunt bear or mountain lion for that same reason.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gaynor Rosier wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Such a rare specimen should always be released. Our oceans are becoming a sea of jellyfish due to the loss of such apex predators.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sophie Guiliguili wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Threatened species => RELEASE !!

Nothing against eating what you catch, but... sharks around the world are being fished by the millions, their populations are decreasing at a very fast pace, they have slow growth and low reproduction rates, bigger ones are often females, and the bigger the more reproductive.

If you love fish, if you love the sea, if you respect life in all its diversity, no matter how different it may be. Please please please do something : change your behavior. This is everyone's responsibility.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Prosperity1122 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

"A monster of the sea was killed" - seems like a primitive description of a necessary animal involved in a delicate aquatic ecosystem.
Eat what you catch and what you kill; no one has the right to destroy an animal for pleasure.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Paige Nelson wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

So sad. Bycatch is a huge problem all over the globe. This amazing creature should've been released.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bgallenger91 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

There's surprisingly very little primary literature about mako shark interactions with recreational fisheries, but one study saw 472 makos caught recreationally from 1981-2002 along the entire east coast. In the same region, 1653 makos were caught on pelagic longlines in an 8 year period. To boot, this is comparatively low to rates of mako shark bycatch in other longline fisheries. Which would you say is making a more significant dent on pelagic shark populations? Surely not recreational fishermen. It's sad that a splendid shark died being caught recreationally, but I'm not sure this is a big issue. Thoughts?

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bgallenger91 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Also, at gaynor-rosier, the increase in jellyfish blooms has almost nothing to do with apex predators. It's a combination of warming, hypoxia and nutrient fluxes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kevin Sullivan wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

A quote from the Marina Del Rey landing says it all... "We haven't seen sharks like that around here for a couple years,"

Gee, no kidding, I wonder why.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kevin Sullivan wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

In response to bgallenger91:

I am SICK AND TIRED of recreational fishermen using the argument that "commercial fishing does way more damage than us" as an excuse to continue decimation of ocean populations. "Hey, they killed a couple thousand so what's a couple hundred more?"...is just MORONIC!!!! Sharks are threatened species any way you cut it. Large sharks like this are the ones that have the best hope of maitaining populations, but of course humans have to show how domineering we are and bring the big ones back to dock to show off. Fishing for large pelagics should be catch and release ONLY.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Arie Winograd wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Yes, the quote from the Marina Del Rey landing DOES SAY IT ALL: "We haven't seen sharks like that around here for a couple years,"....Hmmmmm....could this be that recreational fisherman like CRAIG might be so disconnected to the state of our oceans that he would want to kill this beautiful animal so that he can mount it above his fireplace? This is a prime example of profound human narcissism and our lack of connection with life beyond our own species. Very sad.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from XiBowhunter wrote 48 weeks 6 days ago

Come on guys. How do you know they didn't eat that Mako?

I would have kept it as well. Mako is the best tasting shark in the sea, just under a nurse shark. Even the big ones.

I am always suprised at all of the comments bashing people who keep what they catch. I know if I spent hundreds of dollars in fuel, chatrers, and tackle, I would want to bring something home to show for it as well. That mako will make a lot of good steaks and feed some lucky people for a long time. I wish I was one of them!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JB101 wrote 48 weeks 6 days ago

If it took 8 men to pull that 900lb shark out of the water, they should have had Troy Landry 'choot 'em' and roll that sucker into the boat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 48 weeks 5 days ago

I didn't read where it said it was a female.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 48 weeks 5 days ago

I didn't read where it said it was a female.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from william E. wrote 48 weeks 2 days ago

that must of been one hell of a fight and then one hell of a surprise once they pulled it up to the boat

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sneaky wrote 48 weeks 2 days ago

I'd eat it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red Salas wrote 45 weeks 4 days ago

I agree with blue ox. Should have just let her go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from ggmack wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

cut it loose. take plenty of pictures and go for the release certificate. as others have said a big breeder female like that needs to be released.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from JETurner64 wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Certainly catch and release a great conservation tool for the species and our fellow man to enjoy the outdoors as we have. She is a magnificent spectacle of her species and a sight to behold. All who see her should appreciate her. Do we KNOW she did not end up as table fair? That's a LOT of fish to feed many people. Fish (and all the other critters I/we pursue) are mostly excellent table fair in the right hands. My father taught me early on all game/fish taken were to be eaten, period. What's the more, we live in a country in which the freedom to choose along with the right to voice our opinions was fought and died for. We all get to choose... We should choose well, both in word and deed, as we seek to support our past times, our fellow sportsmen, and our environment....j

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from The White Slug wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

That's at least 10-12 pups that won't be born (probably more for such a huge fish). Big makos taste like poop anyway.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from stvncts wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

So what was the point of killing it? They aren't good ot eat...they certainly were not going to mount it...This is what gives sport fishermen a bad name...we waste destroy our resources and then wonder why there is such a backlash against fishing and hunting...I am a big proponent of you eat what you catch and kill...otherwise find another outlet for your blood lust...

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from conway wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

A good case for changing the take regulations on pelagic sharks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott Hood wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Take a picture and let'em go. I have a picture of a Mako (7 footer) on the wall in my office ... it's wonderful to think it's still out there somewhere!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Remaxman wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

RELEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Raccoon Creeker wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

definitely release, any trophy fish deserves it

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cinjer wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Cut her loose. We are loosing so many top predators in the oceans, with fin soup. etc. They call it sport fishing.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sophie Guiliguili wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Threatened species => RELEASE !!

Nothing against eating what you catch, but... sharks around the world are being fished by the millions, their populations are decreasing at a very fast pace, they have slow growth and low reproduction rates, bigger ones are often females, and the bigger the more reproductive.

If you love fish, if you love the sea, if you respect life in all its diversity, no matter how different it may be. Please please please do something : change your behavior. This is everyone's responsibility.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kevin Sullivan wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

In response to bgallenger91:

I am SICK AND TIRED of recreational fishermen using the argument that "commercial fishing does way more damage than us" as an excuse to continue decimation of ocean populations. "Hey, they killed a couple thousand so what's a couple hundred more?"...is just MORONIC!!!! Sharks are threatened species any way you cut it. Large sharks like this are the ones that have the best hope of maitaining populations, but of course humans have to show how domineering we are and bring the big ones back to dock to show off. Fishing for large pelagics should be catch and release ONLY.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ron Wagner wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

Mixed emotions. Nice to be able to bring in and weigh. How about all the fish that this Mako and its progeny would have eaten and taken off of dinner tables? Catch and release is usually best if you are not going to eat the fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I would have let her go. Just the experience & the memory of such a catch is more than enough.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff O'Connor wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I'm a softy for fish so I would've released it. It sure is impressive though.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from baiello wrote 49 weeks 2 days ago

I'm kind of old school in the fact that I love to eat my catch. Obviously catching and killing any fish for nothing more than a photo opp is wasteful. I'm kind of on the fence about this one. The size alone would provide more than anyone could eat in a year. I love Mako steaks and if this fish was divided among crew and/or donated to a food kitchen I have no problem with not releasing. There are so few once in a lifetime moments like this that I don't think it would decimate the population to keep it. I feel that fishing solely for the sport of it (catch and release) serves only to pump up the ego and without actually eating some of the catch it seems unnecessary to chance killing countless fish just for the thrill of it. Maybe somewhere in between would be a good balance. The all catch and release martyrs kind of make my stomach turn.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael McGraw wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Japan has done enough to kill the worlds oceans. Release her and alow her to continue breeding. Someone needs to help when so many are hurting.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Shane Kovash wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

If in fact it will not be eaten, I would have let it go also. I love to bring home a big trophy but only when I am going to stock my freezer as well. I don't hunt bear or mountain lion for that same reason.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gaynor Rosier wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Such a rare specimen should always be released. Our oceans are becoming a sea of jellyfish due to the loss of such apex predators.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Prosperity1122 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

"A monster of the sea was killed" - seems like a primitive description of a necessary animal involved in a delicate aquatic ecosystem.
Eat what you catch and what you kill; no one has the right to destroy an animal for pleasure.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Paige Nelson wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

So sad. Bycatch is a huge problem all over the globe. This amazing creature should've been released.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from smdmz wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

That was one of the most beautiful paragraph I've ever read on these comment threads.. well said, JETurner64... For me, I tend to lean toward catch & release. As others have alluded to, I think more info is needed here to make any sort of real judgement on these fishermen. That being said, the Mako population/consumption worldwide is quite hard to keep tabs on and regulate, so I think with that in mind these guys maybe should've let this one go. Still love me a good fresh fillet...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bgallenger91 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Also, at gaynor-rosier, the increase in jellyfish blooms has almost nothing to do with apex predators. It's a combination of warming, hypoxia and nutrient fluxes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kevin Sullivan wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

A quote from the Marina Del Rey landing says it all... "We haven't seen sharks like that around here for a couple years,"

Gee, no kidding, I wonder why.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Arie Winograd wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

Yes, the quote from the Marina Del Rey landing DOES SAY IT ALL: "We haven't seen sharks like that around here for a couple years,"....Hmmmmm....could this be that recreational fisherman like CRAIG might be so disconnected to the state of our oceans that he would want to kill this beautiful animal so that he can mount it above his fireplace? This is a prime example of profound human narcissism and our lack of connection with life beyond our own species. Very sad.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JB101 wrote 48 weeks 6 days ago

If it took 8 men to pull that 900lb shark out of the water, they should have had Troy Landry 'choot 'em' and roll that sucker into the boat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 48 weeks 5 days ago

I didn't read where it said it was a female.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 48 weeks 5 days ago

I didn't read where it said it was a female.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from william E. wrote 48 weeks 2 days ago

that must of been one hell of a fight and then one hell of a surprise once they pulled it up to the boat

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sneaky wrote 48 weeks 2 days ago

I'd eat it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red Salas wrote 45 weeks 4 days ago

I agree with blue ox. Should have just let her go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bgallenger91 wrote 49 weeks 1 day ago

There's surprisingly very little primary literature about mako shark interactions with recreational fisheries, but one study saw 472 makos caught recreationally from 1981-2002 along the entire east coast. In the same region, 1653 makos were caught on pelagic longlines in an 8 year period. To boot, this is comparatively low to rates of mako shark bycatch in other longline fisheries. Which would you say is making a more significant dent on pelagic shark populations? Surely not recreational fishermen. It's sad that a splendid shark died being caught recreationally, but I'm not sure this is a big issue. Thoughts?

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from XiBowhunter wrote 48 weeks 6 days ago

Come on guys. How do you know they didn't eat that Mako?

I would have kept it as well. Mako is the best tasting shark in the sea, just under a nurse shark. Even the big ones.

I am always suprised at all of the comments bashing people who keep what they catch. I know if I spent hundreds of dollars in fuel, chatrers, and tackle, I would want to bring something home to show for it as well. That mako will make a lot of good steaks and feed some lucky people for a long time. I wish I was one of them!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment