Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Video: Aerial Drone Sneaks Up on Moose

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 09, 2013

Video: Aerial Drone Sneaks Up on Moose

By Chad Love

 

I recently blogged about the potential use of aerial drones as scouting/hunting tools, costs involved in building viable home-made models, and the possible decrease in price with advances in technology and miniaturization. I don't want to claim that I'm prescient or anything, because we're not there yet from a commercial product standpoint (of course, SHOT opens next week so who knows what's coming down the pike), but this YouTube video involving a moose and a civilian hobbyist quad-roter drone gives us a peek of our potential future.

From this story on Slate.com
Drones can kill terrorists and innocents, they can spy on alleged cattle thieves and help catch rhino poachers, and they can (theoretically) deliver tacos or even the mail. Heretofore underrated, however, has been their potential to thoroughly delight Norwegian hobbyists by allowing them to sneak up on a befuddled moose. From the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation by way of BoingBoing's Cory Doctorow comes a video of just that. A Norwegian Broadcasting Company employee and a couple of friends were playing around with a camera-equipped quadrotor drone when it happened upon the moose minding its own business in a stand of trees. As they brought the copter in for a closer look, the unsuspecting beast slowly turned and bestowed on the machine what we can only assume was a look of pure existential moose confusion.

Pretty fascinating stuff, and it raises a whole host of legal and ethical questions about how this technology should or shouldn't be utilized in the field. This is the future, folks. How do we react to it?

Comments (25)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

If it ever comes to that kinda technocrap in the field, I'll be carrying goose loads out moose hunting. That is not the future of hunting. It will be the end of it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I second OH!!! Not to mention there is no reason to have these available to the public or even the governement period! We don't need to make it any easier for pervs, pedophiles, rapists, etc... to commit their crime. I too will be packing some 3 1/2" BB for these pervs and their cameras!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I don't know what bothers me more, the big brother aspect or their damn giggling, "You know Scandinavian spies, just a bunch of b!tchey little girls!" (my apologizes to Sam)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

That's a cool project, lots of innovation on the builders part, the disturbing part is some folks immediately think of the bad that comes from this rather than the good.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Just a toy for those with nothing better to do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Koldcut, just what "good" is going to come of this? Right now it's an endless swarm of ATVs or snow machines whining up and down the roads and trails pretty much non-stop, especially the first two weeks of season. I am not very excited about the prospect of the airways being also filled with machinery noise. Arrrrgh! Drives me crazy just thinking about it. Okay, I know, it's a short trip ...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from capt.seagull wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

wow

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Chewylouie wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I would like to play with one and maybe even watch deer from it, BUT NOT FOR ANY THING THAT HAD TO DO WITH HUNTING!! There is no fun in it! Plus, in my opinion, it would be unethical. But as far as research goes, or just playing in the yard it would be fun. There are lots of people though that should not get there hands on something like this, like Dcast said.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Douglas wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I just hope I live long enough to blast one of those things out of the sky.
I would even go out and buy a shotgun with a 3.5 inch chamber to do it with.
I suppose now I'm on some law enforcement radar screen.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

OH, if this bugs you, then so should trail camera and cell phones. I know Colorado already has laws restricting communications between aircraft and hunters on the ground, as it's illegal. The ethical parts of this or the parts folks think are bad aren't a far cry from the use of game cameras, but they seem to be all the rage these days. I'm still going with the cool factor on this one.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bryan01 wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

It's a tool that can be used for either good or bad purposes.

Although the moose didn't seem too disturbed by the drone in this video, watching this did remind me of a recent post on this website about a pilot who got ticketed for harassing wildlife when he swooped down to take a closer look at elk in Colorado (or something like that).

Although this tool has a large number of potentially bad uses, it could also be used by ranchers and other large landowners to remotely check out their own property and I'm sure there are many other legitimate uses for it as well.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hermit crab wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Agree with Koldkut and Bryan. Besides, these scandanavians didn't really harass the moose. It came over for a closer peak, they watched it a little and left. They didn't chase it or seem to spook it at all. Kids/Adults and Toys...

Like koldkut said, I fail to see how people can be so uproarious over this but ok with the trail cameras sending pictures to cell phones/computers. If I had a bunch of land that I owned, and had problems with trespassers, I'd love to have one of these.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ENO wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

I think it would be great for tracking wounded animals especially with an infrared camera. You could very easily follow blood trails and locate a wounded bedded animal.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

"I fail to see how people can be so uproarious over this but ok with the trail cameras sending pictures to cell phones/computers."

As with all technologies they have their bad and good. Aerial drones have a stigma behind them and it is well deserved. They can be used for all types of good things but what is their main purpose? Spying! I just plain and simple do not see any good coming of them, but thats me and if you want to own one go for it but be careful where you fly it!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from My Yak wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Some of you condemn the use of a drone for hunting but have no qualms about putting out trail cameras. What is the difference?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Pathfinder1 wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Hi...

Just so long as one doesn't come buzzing over MY head...!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

I might be wrong. But isn't this the reason you can't fly into the back country and hunt on the same day in Alaska. Aerial stacking is already illegal. Using a camera and not sitting in the plane is of little consequence.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

PS On the plus side these gentlemen did no appear to be hunters just model plane guys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Erik Morrissette wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

All new tech can be of good use and do harm. This could be used for rescue, search for lost hunters and their dogs. To locate Varmints and feral pigs, find poachers and other criminals. You can't stop progress but you should regulate the use.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from postmodern_barbarian wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

I wish people who are portray themselves as news reporters knew enough to realize that a hobbyist's radio-controlled (RC) aircraft is really quite different from the remotely-piloted aircraft traditionally referred to as "drones". To fly a RC airplane, quad rotor helicopter, etc. you have to be able to see it while you work the controls. If you lose sight of it, you're out of luck. A real "drone", on the other hand, typically flew on an instrumented range miles away from the where the pilot was sitting. These were often used to provide a realistic target for training fighter pilots or antiaircraft gunners. They were also used for reconnaisance in Vietnam. More recently, with the advent of GPS and robust satellite communication networks, they've taken on much more sophisticated roles. But they're not easy or cheap to use.

Anyway, take a look at www.draganfly.com to get an idea of what the guys in the video were probably using. It can carry a good digital camera. But the key thing to remember is that in order to fly it you have to be close enough to see where it's going and how it's oriented. It could be a useful tool, but I don't think that it would make hunting any easier.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nyflyangler wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Silly Norwegians, this is what you use when moose and squirrel must die.

youtu.be/KBa22uwYzIw

youtu.be/59ttSwYNspw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nyflyangler wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Silly Norwegians, this is what you use when moose and squirrel must die.

youtu.be/KBa22uwYzIw

youtu.be/59ttSwYNspw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FlyinMonkey wrote 22 weeks 21 hours ago

I don't want to see them used for hunting either but I also agree with the comments of how is it really any different than trail camera's. Which made me think of fish finders. How many people troll around staring at that little screen until you see some fish around some cover? How many use the Hummingbird fish finders that have the sonar that you can actually see the fish and what cover they are on? Is that any different? Just a thought.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

With a trail camera you can see photos of animals that were in front of my camera. You go in the woods and pulled your memory card from the camera to veiw the photos. The photos your looking at are in the past tense.
With the aerial drone a large gun club could check out a section of woods, and see a large buck laying in his bed at the very same time, then ambush him with an organized deer drive.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from yanzi wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

Asian Dating- youth with love, is perfect happiness. www.lilydating.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Ontario Honker ... wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

If it ever comes to that kinda technocrap in the field, I'll be carrying goose loads out moose hunting. That is not the future of hunting. It will be the end of it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Chewylouie wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I would like to play with one and maybe even watch deer from it, BUT NOT FOR ANY THING THAT HAD TO DO WITH HUNTING!! There is no fun in it! Plus, in my opinion, it would be unethical. But as far as research goes, or just playing in the yard it would be fun. There are lots of people though that should not get there hands on something like this, like Dcast said.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

OH, if this bugs you, then so should trail camera and cell phones. I know Colorado already has laws restricting communications between aircraft and hunters on the ground, as it's illegal. The ethical parts of this or the parts folks think are bad aren't a far cry from the use of game cameras, but they seem to be all the rage these days. I'm still going with the cool factor on this one.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bryan01 wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

It's a tool that can be used for either good or bad purposes.

Although the moose didn't seem too disturbed by the drone in this video, watching this did remind me of a recent post on this website about a pilot who got ticketed for harassing wildlife when he swooped down to take a closer look at elk in Colorado (or something like that).

Although this tool has a large number of potentially bad uses, it could also be used by ranchers and other large landowners to remotely check out their own property and I'm sure there are many other legitimate uses for it as well.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

"I fail to see how people can be so uproarious over this but ok with the trail cameras sending pictures to cell phones/computers."

As with all technologies they have their bad and good. Aerial drones have a stigma behind them and it is well deserved. They can be used for all types of good things but what is their main purpose? Spying! I just plain and simple do not see any good coming of them, but thats me and if you want to own one go for it but be careful where you fly it!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I second OH!!! Not to mention there is no reason to have these available to the public or even the governement period! We don't need to make it any easier for pervs, pedophiles, rapists, etc... to commit their crime. I too will be packing some 3 1/2" BB for these pervs and their cameras!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I don't know what bothers me more, the big brother aspect or their damn giggling, "You know Scandinavian spies, just a bunch of b!tchey little girls!" (my apologizes to Sam)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

That's a cool project, lots of innovation on the builders part, the disturbing part is some folks immediately think of the bad that comes from this rather than the good.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Just a toy for those with nothing better to do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Koldcut, just what "good" is going to come of this? Right now it's an endless swarm of ATVs or snow machines whining up and down the roads and trails pretty much non-stop, especially the first two weeks of season. I am not very excited about the prospect of the airways being also filled with machinery noise. Arrrrgh! Drives me crazy just thinking about it. Okay, I know, it's a short trip ...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from capt.seagull wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

wow

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Douglas wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

I just hope I live long enough to blast one of those things out of the sky.
I would even go out and buy a shotgun with a 3.5 inch chamber to do it with.
I suppose now I'm on some law enforcement radar screen.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from hermit crab wrote 22 weeks 3 days ago

Agree with Koldkut and Bryan. Besides, these scandanavians didn't really harass the moose. It came over for a closer peak, they watched it a little and left. They didn't chase it or seem to spook it at all. Kids/Adults and Toys...

Like koldkut said, I fail to see how people can be so uproarious over this but ok with the trail cameras sending pictures to cell phones/computers. If I had a bunch of land that I owned, and had problems with trespassers, I'd love to have one of these.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ENO wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

I think it would be great for tracking wounded animals especially with an infrared camera. You could very easily follow blood trails and locate a wounded bedded animal.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from My Yak wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Some of you condemn the use of a drone for hunting but have no qualms about putting out trail cameras. What is the difference?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Pathfinder1 wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Hi...

Just so long as one doesn't come buzzing over MY head...!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

I might be wrong. But isn't this the reason you can't fly into the back country and hunt on the same day in Alaska. Aerial stacking is already illegal. Using a camera and not sitting in the plane is of little consequence.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

PS On the plus side these gentlemen did no appear to be hunters just model plane guys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Erik Morrissette wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

All new tech can be of good use and do harm. This could be used for rescue, search for lost hunters and their dogs. To locate Varmints and feral pigs, find poachers and other criminals. You can't stop progress but you should regulate the use.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from postmodern_barbarian wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

I wish people who are portray themselves as news reporters knew enough to realize that a hobbyist's radio-controlled (RC) aircraft is really quite different from the remotely-piloted aircraft traditionally referred to as "drones". To fly a RC airplane, quad rotor helicopter, etc. you have to be able to see it while you work the controls. If you lose sight of it, you're out of luck. A real "drone", on the other hand, typically flew on an instrumented range miles away from the where the pilot was sitting. These were often used to provide a realistic target for training fighter pilots or antiaircraft gunners. They were also used for reconnaisance in Vietnam. More recently, with the advent of GPS and robust satellite communication networks, they've taken on much more sophisticated roles. But they're not easy or cheap to use.

Anyway, take a look at www.draganfly.com to get an idea of what the guys in the video were probably using. It can carry a good digital camera. But the key thing to remember is that in order to fly it you have to be close enough to see where it's going and how it's oriented. It could be a useful tool, but I don't think that it would make hunting any easier.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nyflyangler wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Silly Norwegians, this is what you use when moose and squirrel must die.

youtu.be/KBa22uwYzIw

youtu.be/59ttSwYNspw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nyflyangler wrote 22 weeks 1 day ago

Silly Norwegians, this is what you use when moose and squirrel must die.

youtu.be/KBa22uwYzIw

youtu.be/59ttSwYNspw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FlyinMonkey wrote 22 weeks 21 hours ago

I don't want to see them used for hunting either but I also agree with the comments of how is it really any different than trail camera's. Which made me think of fish finders. How many people troll around staring at that little screen until you see some fish around some cover? How many use the Hummingbird fish finders that have the sonar that you can actually see the fish and what cover they are on? Is that any different? Just a thought.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

With a trail camera you can see photos of animals that were in front of my camera. You go in the woods and pulled your memory card from the camera to veiw the photos. The photos your looking at are in the past tense.
With the aerial drone a large gun club could check out a section of woods, and see a large buck laying in his bed at the very same time, then ambush him with an organized deer drive.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from yanzi wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

Asian Dating- youth with love, is perfect happiness. www.lilydating.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs