Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Suppressors Legal for Hunting in North Carolina, But Will County Sheriffs Grant Approvals?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 01, 2013

Suppressors Legal for Hunting in North Carolina, But Will County Sheriffs Grant Approvals?

By Ben Romans

In a time when many states are tightening restrictions on firearms, some severely, North Carolina lawmakers passed a provision last week allowing hunters to use sound suppressors. The provision was part of broader legislation allowing permit holders to legally carry concealed weapons in more places, including bars.

In an article from the Charlotte Observer, Sen. Shirley Randleman said she insisted the bill include language about silencers.

“I was initially contacted by some of my constituents,” she told the Observer. “They had hunted for years and had experienced significant hearing loss, which was attributed to the use of the weapons when hunting. And then I was contacted by some of the audiologists in my district who also told me about the hundreds of people they examine yearly who experience this hearing loss.”

The article goes on to say the nation’s attitude towards suppressors is changing, and the Tar Heel State is the 40th to legalize suppressors. Also, because suppressors muffle the sound from a gun’s barrel, hunters will be able to hunt in more developed areas where a rifle blast might otherwise irk others.

Of greater concern is monitoring their legality. The ATF performs background checks for anyone buying a suppressor, and after that, according to Julia Rush, a spokesperson for Mecklenburg Sheriff Chipp Baily, a person still needs approval from the county sheriff—requests he’s rejected in the past.

“I have traditionally been opposed to silencers in a county as urban as Mecklenburg, where open spaces are limited,” Bailey said in a statement. “That said, I will ask my attorney to research the law and advise as to how much leeway I have in approving or denying their issuance. If the law mandates they be approved, then I will follow the law.”

Comments (10)

Top Rated
All Comments
from PreserveTheWild wrote 36 weeks 6 days ago

Not going to touch this one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ENO wrote 36 weeks 6 days ago

I don't have a problem with this. These are interesting times. It seems like the more public outcry for tighter gun control results in more guns sales and less regulation.
Go figure.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 36 weeks 1 day ago

There is a legal way around the CLEO approval. One can have an attorney create a trust. It does not require approval from the CLEO of the applicant's county. That is another reason NC considered allowing suppressors for hunting, because the CLEO can be legally circumvented.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from PreserveTheWild wrote 36 weeks 6 days ago

Not going to touch this one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ENO wrote 36 weeks 6 days ago

I don't have a problem with this. These are interesting times. It seems like the more public outcry for tighter gun control results in more guns sales and less regulation.
Go figure.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 36 weeks 1 day ago

There is a legal way around the CLEO approval. One can have an attorney create a trust. It does not require approval from the CLEO of the applicant's county. That is another reason NC considered allowing suppressors for hunting, because the CLEO can be legally circumvented.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment