


April 14, 2010
Major U.S. Jewelry Maker to Boycott Alaska Pebble Mine Gold
By Chad Love
Remember the controversial Pebble mine proposal for the headwaters of Alaska's famous Bristol Bay? Flytalk's Tim Romano blogged about it here. Now it seems many jewelery manufacturers are saying they won't buy gold from the mine.
From the story in the Anchorage Daily News:
The nation's second-largest jewelry retailer on Tuesday joined the opposition to development of a gold and copper prospect in Southwest Alaska. Zale Corp. said it will boycott precious metals from the Pebble prospect if it becomes a mine. Zale also said it supports permanently protecting the Bristol Bay watershed from large-scale metals mining. Pebble is situated near the headwaters of two of Bristol Bay's salmon-spawning rivers. Five Bristol Bay rivers collectively support the world's largest wild-sockeye salmon fishery. The Texas-based jewelry giant has 1,930 stores in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Conservation group Earthworks and partners have now enlisted more than 30 jewelers to oppose Pebble development.
The mining company's response? Big Deal. No, literally. That's what they said...
Canada's Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and London-based Anglo American have formed the Pebble Partnership to work the Pebble prospect. John Shively, chief executive of the partnership, said Zale coming out against Pebble is nothing more than a meaningless publicity stunt. "It is pretty easy for a company to come out against buying gold that doesn't exist at this point," he said. "We are years away from construction. The people managing that company now will probably be gone. Big deal."
So a Canadian and British consortium are going to devastate one of America's most pristine public resources for the private profit of a non-American company. Eh, big deal, right?
Your reaction?
Comments (7)
Just another failing of our *enlightened* government - we allow foreign countries to come in and clean us out of our resources under the guise of "We're creating jobs!" Meanwhile, we're losing jobs in the fishing and tourism industry because of the damage caused. It's all a shell game, and we the public are left holding the tab. The fact that the executive of the consortium can say "Eh, big deal" is akin to spitting in our faces. He doesn't care about anything but his bottom line, but I guess that's what we should expect from our titans of industry. Who cares about the common good -- we have money to make!!
If our president and his party won't man up and stop the asian carp invasion of the great lakes what makes you think they'll do anything to stop the threat of mining polution in Sara Palin's state!
it will take our government to stop this, but i think we all know that aint gonna happen, like walt said.
If this mine goes in it will be without a doubt one of the greatest envirmental disasters of our lifetime. Please find or purchase the documentary "Red Gold" it is a look at both sides of the issue. The footage of the area is also amazing and reason enough to own the documentary.
Actually, it is a big deal.
Zale is a major player in the global jewelry industry – a sector not generally known for biting the hand that feeds it – that is, mining companies. But in the case of Pebble, Zale is just the latest in a growing list of jewelers who have decided Pebble is the kind of mining proposal that gives responsible mining a bad name. Because the mine is to be sited up the watershed that feeds Bristol Bay – near Lake Iliamna, the largest fresh water body in all of Alaska -- this mega-mine would endanger one of the most productive salmon fisheries in the world and everything that depends on it, from Native communities to commercial and recreational fisheries to wildlife species, both marine and terrestrial. It makes no sense to gamble with an existing renewable resource like Alaska’s incomparable salmon fishery – a resource that generates an estimated $400 million each year and thousands of jobs for Alaskans – in favor of a mining scheme devised by a consortium of foreign companies who would enrich themselves even if it means risking the livelihood of Bristol Bay residents.
Zale’s announcement is important, although Mr. Shively may not want to admit it, because of the signal it sends to potential investors, to elected officials, and to the public generally. There is a growing tide of broad-based opposition to the Pebble Mine, and it should be abandoned – now.
How much are we willing to destroy in the name of the dollar?
I was just in bristol bay and its not worth runing for gold that people wont even buy.
Post a Comment
Just another failing of our *enlightened* government - we allow foreign countries to come in and clean us out of our resources under the guise of "We're creating jobs!" Meanwhile, we're losing jobs in the fishing and tourism industry because of the damage caused. It's all a shell game, and we the public are left holding the tab. The fact that the executive of the consortium can say "Eh, big deal" is akin to spitting in our faces. He doesn't care about anything but his bottom line, but I guess that's what we should expect from our titans of industry. Who cares about the common good -- we have money to make!!
If our president and his party won't man up and stop the asian carp invasion of the great lakes what makes you think they'll do anything to stop the threat of mining polution in Sara Palin's state!
it will take our government to stop this, but i think we all know that aint gonna happen, like walt said.
If this mine goes in it will be without a doubt one of the greatest envirmental disasters of our lifetime. Please find or purchase the documentary "Red Gold" it is a look at both sides of the issue. The footage of the area is also amazing and reason enough to own the documentary.
Actually, it is a big deal.
Zale is a major player in the global jewelry industry – a sector not generally known for biting the hand that feeds it – that is, mining companies. But in the case of Pebble, Zale is just the latest in a growing list of jewelers who have decided Pebble is the kind of mining proposal that gives responsible mining a bad name. Because the mine is to be sited up the watershed that feeds Bristol Bay – near Lake Iliamna, the largest fresh water body in all of Alaska -- this mega-mine would endanger one of the most productive salmon fisheries in the world and everything that depends on it, from Native communities to commercial and recreational fisheries to wildlife species, both marine and terrestrial. It makes no sense to gamble with an existing renewable resource like Alaska’s incomparable salmon fishery – a resource that generates an estimated $400 million each year and thousands of jobs for Alaskans – in favor of a mining scheme devised by a consortium of foreign companies who would enrich themselves even if it means risking the livelihood of Bristol Bay residents.
Zale’s announcement is important, although Mr. Shively may not want to admit it, because of the signal it sends to potential investors, to elected officials, and to the public generally. There is a growing tide of broad-based opposition to the Pebble Mine, and it should be abandoned – now.
How much are we willing to destroy in the name of the dollar?
I was just in bristol bay and its not worth runing for gold that people wont even buy.
Post a Comment