


May 20, 2010
Marshall: Why Deep Ocean Drilling is Such a Threat
By Bob Marshall
Since the beginning of the BP oil disaster, industry experts have never failed to speak-- usually in reverent terms-- about the science involved in deep ocean drilling. You probably remember hearing this refrain “It rivals what we do in space.”
Actually, space work is easier. And that's a very, very important point.
Space is easier because we have the technology that allows humans to not only travel there, but also to work in that environment. Sending a shuttle crew up to perform repair jobs on satellites has become almost routine. The sight of an astronaut floating away from the international space station, tools in hand, to solve even a life-threatening problem no longer elicits front page headlines.
We have no such mastery in the deep ocean. We don’t have the technology that will allows us to do hands-on repair work a mile under the surface of the Gulf. We can’t rush a rescue team to fix that broken blowout preventer. We can’t apply human eyes and intelligence on site to stop the gusher BP opened on the floor of the Gulf, a mistake that now threatens precious ecosystems from Louisiana to Florida and beyond.
Our government-- the watchdog we depend on the protect the public’s interest and property-- was well aware of this when it began permitting these operations. Deep water drilling was-- and is-- a gamble with a horrendous environmental down side because responding in a timely and effective manner to catastrophic accidents remains beyond our technology.
Here's an analogy.
We don't have the technology to send humans to Mars, but we know how to operate robots there. Is that enough assurance to permit an activity on Mars that could result in serious damage to the earth's environment if there were an accident? Would the nation agree to remote control of such an operation, or would it say: Not until we can get people on the ground?
That’s the danger of deep ocean drilling. We allowed a venture with a significant chance of catastrophic accidents that can endanger billions of dollars in commercial infrastructure as well as the physical health and quality of life of tens of millions of people-- because it was only a mile away from the control panels.
But as we now know, it might as well be on Mars.
Comments (22)
This is why we study economics. Economics involves choices. We chose to drill in deep water. Outa sight, outa mind. We chose to drill in deepwater rather than ANWR. Some places, and our caribou, are too sacred.
I appreciate the difficulty that deep sea drillers face. There is absolutely no margin of error there, as in space. However, if we don't drill, someone else will. We need the oil. Our options include buying oil from the Middle East (Al Quaeda). Easing restrictions on drilling on land, or not using oil. If you opt for the latter, I really don't want to see you in a car, train or plane.
Time for "the abyss" type divingsuits...
Also, it is much more difficult to pollute space...
Its the effects of such a high demand and legal monopolies. We cant live with it can't live without it.
Good article. Now let's sit back and wait for the angry rant that will end with comments about PETA and HSUS. We are all responsible in a way for this mess, our sense of entitlement and love of convenience trumps all else. And we are not going to vote for a leader that prescribes strong medicine.
I'm not going to debate philosophy on whether we should drill or not. It's a fantastically complicated issue. If there's one thing that has infuriated me over the course of all of this it's the lack of preparedness. Considering the volumes of money involved and the potential impacts, I think it's ridiculous that a driller is not required to have the equipment (and I'm aware of how specialized it is) to mitigate and plug a leak on site or at least in a ready room to go in a warehouse at the closest port.
BP's engineers are well aware of the fact that methane exists in crystalline forms at that depth, yet they still endeavored to build and lower that steel catch bin. I guess now they can say that they tried. The slick and subsurface plumes in the gulf are bad enough, but what will happen come hurricane season when the oil is lapping off the surf in high winds and is deposited thickly not only on the marshes and beaches but atop every community straddling the shorelines?
One would think great minds would have a "safety net" in place prior to any such exploration. But there comes a danger and a threat that may be on going as long as this oil well continues to pour out into the gulf.
Realizing the magnitude of confusion the offshore oil spill has created, why hasn't President Obama and his administration addressed the oil spill as a National Security Breach?
With all of the activity on the ocean,the fishing trawlers,cruise ships, vessels that are helping with the oil spill, how easy would it be for a planned terrorist group to get past the International Waters, and into our gulfs and tributaries, perhaps initiating attacks similar to those of the Somalian Pirates,or even Al-Qaeda, planning an attack at sea, in our gulf, rivers and tributaries instead of the air?
Also is the Coast Guard patrolling the waters looking for other vessels that may see the oil spill as an opportunity to dump sewage, toxic chemicals or anything that may not only cause harm to our shores and wildlife, but pose a risk and a threat to the people that reside on or near our coastal waters?
Is the Air Force and Navy working to keep our waters safe and security tight, while this fiasco oil spill becomes more than a disaster with dire consequences for our greatest resource ... The American People?
Does anyone know if the President or his administration has addressed these issues?
Sleep tight tonight America, we're in good hands.
Are we really?
Asleep at the wheel? Why did a well 40 miles from shore 5000 ft deep not have the best failsafe auto blow out preventer installed? There was a spill in the bay of Campeche south of the Texas coast in 1979. Did'nt we learn anything from this spill? The sludge from this 30 year old spill is still washing ashore on Texas beaches today. Now all Gulf coast sands will turn brown. The whitehouse is doing what about this current spill? pointing fingers? Asking questions? The whitehouse needs to step in and by any means cap, cover or invent the methods to do so.
How come this is never compaired or reported anymore?
NOAA Estimate: 140,000,000 gallons of oil spilled from Campeche eruption
Cedre: "On 3 June 1979, in the Gulf of Mexico (Bay of Campeche), some 80 km from Carmen town, Ixtoc 1's offshore drilling rig, set up by the Perforaciones Marinas del Golfo on behalf of the national company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex), was destroyed by the blast of an oil eruption. A fire broke out. This type of accident is quite rare, although it is not one of a kind.
...This eruption lasted far longer. It was only stopped on 23 March 1980, after 295 days, during the which the oil spurt had been reduced first from 4,200 - 4,300 tonnes/day to 1,400 - 1,500 tonnes/day, thanks to the digging of freeing pipes which lowered pressure in the implicated well.
"The total quantity of oil spilled at sea will never be known exactly. The more cautious estimations suggest some 470,000 tonnes were spilled, while in the worst case scenario it could be as much as 1,500,000 tonnes. Between half and a third of this oil burned, causing a vast atmospheric pollution. The remaining part spread over the Gulf of Mexico in the form of drifting slicks. ..."
http://ddimick.typepad.com/dennis_dimicks_blog/2010/05/ixtoc-1-spill-197...
http://www.incidentnews.gov/incident/6250
BP could probably stop the leak but I believe they don't want to because they want to capture the leak instead of shutting off the flow. Note that anything they have tried is stuff that will keep the oil going into their ships and money in their pockets. BP put a cork in it already
Hey, where did all the "drill, baby, drill" people go?
Drill baby Drill !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Drain it dry.
Didn't we all learn that being prepared for emergencies is an important part of every plan? Like years ago,in the Boy Scouts in my case.
There has been too much trying to figure out who's fault it is and not enough doing something about the problem,hell we could have scooped up half of it in 5 gallon buckets by now!
The best idea I have heard is building up fake barrier islands,the Corps of Engineers has enough dredge boats around the country,along with all the private dredge boats,at least this would protect some of the marshes,and the real barrier islands.This should have been part of BP's "worst case scenario" plans.
We need to do all we can now to clean this up,then make sure it never can happen again.
Anybody else think that maybe these dispersants could be the reason for subsurface oil? I say cap the thing asap and leave the extra chemicals out of the process. So much for seafood from the gulf and eastern coast for the next 20 years, Thanks.
I'd like to have some expert geologist explain why the drill hole cannot be planted with a circle of explosives deep beneath the seabed and crush the opening and pipe shut with a simultaneous surrounding underground blast. With all of the ocean pressure and the added pressure from the weight of the seabed geology and physics should be able to calculate the required pressure to oppose the oil and gas leak. I think BP doesn't want to do this because they see all of the dollar signs they put into and that can come out of that hole in the ocean floor.
Additionally I just want to comment on how idiotic it is to try and blame this catastrophe on the current administration which in the one year that it has existed has gone leaps and bounds past the previous administration in it's recognition of conservation issues. It's equally idiotic to suggest that people quit trying to place blame because some humans are definitely at fault and it's important for the welfare of the nation to find out who and why.
Hey Yooper,
You said in your post "...if we don't drill, someone else will."
Just for the record, BP is someone else. Not an American company, and really not any different from buying oil anywhere on the international market.
Despite the arguments, pros and cons of drilling, who blames who, and all else;
There was something very simple that I was talking to my wife about the other day, and couldn't understand why it was taking so long to 'figure something out' to stop this.
I mean, we've had information drilled into us about everything. What if your house catches on fire? What if there's a tornado? Risk management is an important part of any company.
There's been off-shore drilling for what... two generations? And with all our modern technology, nobody... NOBODY ever sat down and said; "Let's figure out what to do if the shaft breaks free."?
"We are all responsible in a way for this mess, our sense of entitlement and love of convenience trumps all else..."
Speak for yourself. I didn't create this economy, and I don't have a sense of entitlement unless you mean that by being an American I am automatically guilty of something. More's the point, I've been talking and voting to support nuclear and solar power for thirty years. I don't "own" any of this oil fiasco. I didn't vote for the jerks who put foreign companies in charge of extraction of US taxpayer owned assets. The car I drive has outstanding fuel economy; I'm not the guy towing the quad behind the rv behind the 10-cylinder pickup. None of this is "on" me.
We could replace alot of our fossil fuel consumption ANY TIME WE WANT TO START DOING IT. But as long as "money buys access, not legislation, nudge nudge wink wink" is the rule, that which is best for America or desired by most Americans won't have jack to do with it when it comes to writing legislation.
And yes, this accident was completely avoidable with proper planning. Ocean drilling, even deep, can be done safely, but not as long as the oil companies can think of harm as an expensible cost of doing business.
Apparently that fail-safe device didn't work because some idiot wasn't concerned enough about the risk or serious enough about the job to make sure that the batteries running the damb thing had a charge. The only defense against Corporate Stupids is to make the cost of failure so expensive that proper work gets done.
There are ways to stop this well, but we as Americans are not willing to even think about accepting these methods as an option. Marshall, how do you travel? Is it so hard for you to realize that our world NEEDS oil for so much of our daily lives? Would you rather see the last remaining wild places on this continent converted to oil fields? Or how about what relatively few grasslands we have lefty being turned into corn fields for ethanol production? This spill is tragic indeed, and the fact that BP is still dancing around with their hands up our rectums certainly isn't helping the situation. But we will stop this thing and it will get cleaned up. It will cost us a lot of money, but it will be money well spent in terms of the clean-up. YOU, Mr. Marshall, need to get realistic for a moment. Out of all the offshore oil rigs, we had one blow. It was bound to happen at some point and it could have been stopped a long time ago. NUKE THE WELL! And don't barage me with a buch a feel good, save the fish crap before you read into the process first. We have been setting off nukes underwater for how long? Wouldn't it seem like now would be the time to do it more than ever?
38 days an counting.Id think there would of been "What if?"Saftey precaution?I hope they get ahead of this quickly.BP needs to step up,clean up,pay up.Grandad use to say a hog with his head in the trough really dont care whats goin on around him. JMO
The senate testimony on this is getting interesting.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/26/oil.spill.investigation/index.html
Surprise surprise. Someone shortcut safety to shave time to getting to production. Sounds like Masse Energy all over again.
Post a Comment
I'm not going to debate philosophy on whether we should drill or not. It's a fantastically complicated issue. If there's one thing that has infuriated me over the course of all of this it's the lack of preparedness. Considering the volumes of money involved and the potential impacts, I think it's ridiculous that a driller is not required to have the equipment (and I'm aware of how specialized it is) to mitigate and plug a leak on site or at least in a ready room to go in a warehouse at the closest port.
BP's engineers are well aware of the fact that methane exists in crystalline forms at that depth, yet they still endeavored to build and lower that steel catch bin. I guess now they can say that they tried. The slick and subsurface plumes in the gulf are bad enough, but what will happen come hurricane season when the oil is lapping off the surf in high winds and is deposited thickly not only on the marshes and beaches but atop every community straddling the shorelines?
Asleep at the wheel? Why did a well 40 miles from shore 5000 ft deep not have the best failsafe auto blow out preventer installed? There was a spill in the bay of Campeche south of the Texas coast in 1979. Did'nt we learn anything from this spill? The sludge from this 30 year old spill is still washing ashore on Texas beaches today. Now all Gulf coast sands will turn brown. The whitehouse is doing what about this current spill? pointing fingers? Asking questions? The whitehouse needs to step in and by any means cap, cover or invent the methods to do so.
How come this is never compaired or reported anymore?
NOAA Estimate: 140,000,000 gallons of oil spilled from Campeche eruption
Cedre: "On 3 June 1979, in the Gulf of Mexico (Bay of Campeche), some 80 km from Carmen town, Ixtoc 1's offshore drilling rig, set up by the Perforaciones Marinas del Golfo on behalf of the national company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex), was destroyed by the blast of an oil eruption. A fire broke out. This type of accident is quite rare, although it is not one of a kind.
...This eruption lasted far longer. It was only stopped on 23 March 1980, after 295 days, during the which the oil spurt had been reduced first from 4,200 - 4,300 tonnes/day to 1,400 - 1,500 tonnes/day, thanks to the digging of freeing pipes which lowered pressure in the implicated well.
"The total quantity of oil spilled at sea will never be known exactly. The more cautious estimations suggest some 470,000 tonnes were spilled, while in the worst case scenario it could be as much as 1,500,000 tonnes. Between half and a third of this oil burned, causing a vast atmospheric pollution. The remaining part spread over the Gulf of Mexico in the form of drifting slicks. ..."
http://ddimick.typepad.com/dennis_dimicks_blog/2010/05/ixtoc-1-spill-197...
http://www.incidentnews.gov/incident/6250
And yes, this accident was completely avoidable with proper planning. Ocean drilling, even deep, can be done safely, but not as long as the oil companies can think of harm as an expensible cost of doing business.
Apparently that fail-safe device didn't work because some idiot wasn't concerned enough about the risk or serious enough about the job to make sure that the batteries running the damb thing had a charge. The only defense against Corporate Stupids is to make the cost of failure so expensive that proper work gets done.
Good article. Now let's sit back and wait for the angry rant that will end with comments about PETA and HSUS. We are all responsible in a way for this mess, our sense of entitlement and love of convenience trumps all else. And we are not going to vote for a leader that prescribes strong medicine.
One would think great minds would have a "safety net" in place prior to any such exploration. But there comes a danger and a threat that may be on going as long as this oil well continues to pour out into the gulf.
Realizing the magnitude of confusion the offshore oil spill has created, why hasn't President Obama and his administration addressed the oil spill as a National Security Breach?
With all of the activity on the ocean,the fishing trawlers,cruise ships, vessels that are helping with the oil spill, how easy would it be for a planned terrorist group to get past the International Waters, and into our gulfs and tributaries, perhaps initiating attacks similar to those of the Somalian Pirates,or even Al-Qaeda, planning an attack at sea, in our gulf, rivers and tributaries instead of the air?
Also is the Coast Guard patrolling the waters looking for other vessels that may see the oil spill as an opportunity to dump sewage, toxic chemicals or anything that may not only cause harm to our shores and wildlife, but pose a risk and a threat to the people that reside on or near our coastal waters?
Is the Air Force and Navy working to keep our waters safe and security tight, while this fiasco oil spill becomes more than a disaster with dire consequences for our greatest resource ... The American People?
Does anyone know if the President or his administration has addressed these issues?
Sleep tight tonight America, we're in good hands.
Are we really?
Time for "the abyss" type divingsuits...
Also, it is much more difficult to pollute space...
Its the effects of such a high demand and legal monopolies. We cant live with it can't live without it.
BP could probably stop the leak but I believe they don't want to because they want to capture the leak instead of shutting off the flow. Note that anything they have tried is stuff that will keep the oil going into their ships and money in their pockets. BP put a cork in it already
Hey Yooper,
You said in your post "...if we don't drill, someone else will."
Just for the record, BP is someone else. Not an American company, and really not any different from buying oil anywhere on the international market.
Hey, where did all the "drill, baby, drill" people go?
Didn't we all learn that being prepared for emergencies is an important part of every plan? Like years ago,in the Boy Scouts in my case.
There has been too much trying to figure out who's fault it is and not enough doing something about the problem,hell we could have scooped up half of it in 5 gallon buckets by now!
The best idea I have heard is building up fake barrier islands,the Corps of Engineers has enough dredge boats around the country,along with all the private dredge boats,at least this would protect some of the marshes,and the real barrier islands.This should have been part of BP's "worst case scenario" plans.
We need to do all we can now to clean this up,then make sure it never can happen again.
Anybody else think that maybe these dispersants could be the reason for subsurface oil? I say cap the thing asap and leave the extra chemicals out of the process. So much for seafood from the gulf and eastern coast for the next 20 years, Thanks.
Despite the arguments, pros and cons of drilling, who blames who, and all else;
There was something very simple that I was talking to my wife about the other day, and couldn't understand why it was taking so long to 'figure something out' to stop this.
I mean, we've had information drilled into us about everything. What if your house catches on fire? What if there's a tornado? Risk management is an important part of any company.
There's been off-shore drilling for what... two generations? And with all our modern technology, nobody... NOBODY ever sat down and said; "Let's figure out what to do if the shaft breaks free."?
"We are all responsible in a way for this mess, our sense of entitlement and love of convenience trumps all else..."
Speak for yourself. I didn't create this economy, and I don't have a sense of entitlement unless you mean that by being an American I am automatically guilty of something. More's the point, I've been talking and voting to support nuclear and solar power for thirty years. I don't "own" any of this oil fiasco. I didn't vote for the jerks who put foreign companies in charge of extraction of US taxpayer owned assets. The car I drive has outstanding fuel economy; I'm not the guy towing the quad behind the rv behind the 10-cylinder pickup. None of this is "on" me.
We could replace alot of our fossil fuel consumption ANY TIME WE WANT TO START DOING IT. But as long as "money buys access, not legislation, nudge nudge wink wink" is the rule, that which is best for America or desired by most Americans won't have jack to do with it when it comes to writing legislation.
The senate testimony on this is getting interesting.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/26/oil.spill.investigation/index.html
Surprise surprise. Someone shortcut safety to shave time to getting to production. Sounds like Masse Energy all over again.
I'd like to have some expert geologist explain why the drill hole cannot be planted with a circle of explosives deep beneath the seabed and crush the opening and pipe shut with a simultaneous surrounding underground blast. With all of the ocean pressure and the added pressure from the weight of the seabed geology and physics should be able to calculate the required pressure to oppose the oil and gas leak. I think BP doesn't want to do this because they see all of the dollar signs they put into and that can come out of that hole in the ocean floor.
Additionally I just want to comment on how idiotic it is to try and blame this catastrophe on the current administration which in the one year that it has existed has gone leaps and bounds past the previous administration in it's recognition of conservation issues. It's equally idiotic to suggest that people quit trying to place blame because some humans are definitely at fault and it's important for the welfare of the nation to find out who and why.
38 days an counting.Id think there would of been "What if?"Saftey precaution?I hope they get ahead of this quickly.BP needs to step up,clean up,pay up.Grandad use to say a hog with his head in the trough really dont care whats goin on around him. JMO
This is why we study economics. Economics involves choices. We chose to drill in deep water. Outa sight, outa mind. We chose to drill in deepwater rather than ANWR. Some places, and our caribou, are too sacred.
I appreciate the difficulty that deep sea drillers face. There is absolutely no margin of error there, as in space. However, if we don't drill, someone else will. We need the oil. Our options include buying oil from the Middle East (Al Quaeda). Easing restrictions on drilling on land, or not using oil. If you opt for the latter, I really don't want to see you in a car, train or plane.
Drill baby Drill !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Drain it dry.
There are ways to stop this well, but we as Americans are not willing to even think about accepting these methods as an option. Marshall, how do you travel? Is it so hard for you to realize that our world NEEDS oil for so much of our daily lives? Would you rather see the last remaining wild places on this continent converted to oil fields? Or how about what relatively few grasslands we have lefty being turned into corn fields for ethanol production? This spill is tragic indeed, and the fact that BP is still dancing around with their hands up our rectums certainly isn't helping the situation. But we will stop this thing and it will get cleaned up. It will cost us a lot of money, but it will be money well spent in terms of the clean-up. YOU, Mr. Marshall, need to get realistic for a moment. Out of all the offshore oil rigs, we had one blow. It was bound to happen at some point and it could have been stopped a long time ago. NUKE THE WELL! And don't barage me with a buch a feel good, save the fish crap before you read into the process first. We have been setting off nukes underwater for how long? Wouldn't it seem like now would be the time to do it more than ever?
Post a Comment