Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Deeter: Trout Aren't Predators...Right?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 09, 2010

Deeter: Trout Aren't Predators...Right?

By Kirk Deeter

I'm not going to suggest that trout have the predatory ferocity of sharks, or northern pike, or even largemouth bass. But they do have their moments...


Case in point: Check out this photo sent by my friend John Flick, co- owner of Duranglers Fly Shop in Durango, Colorado. Guide Cory Craven is holding a rainbow trout that not only choked down a (not much) smaller brown trout, it also ate a fly. Things like this happen on the wild rivers in southwestern Colorado.

I was once fully convinced that rainbows were merely timid bug-eaters until I spent an afternoon on a remote Alaskan creek with Tyler Palmerton, tossing mouse flies. We caught 18 fish, all over 20 inches long, all on furry dry flies, in the middle of the day.

I've also seen things eat in the middle of the night on certain Michigan rivers that make me think twice about dipping my toes in the water.

My new theory is that trout that eat little bitty flies all day (or don't eat at all), do so because they get the snot pounded out of them by anglers during prime fishing hours. The "predatory nature" of trout is sometimes directly proportional to the amount of flies trout see.

The lesson? If you can avoid the circus on the river... make it a meal.

Deeter

Comments (28)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Those Michigan rivers are crazy- Monsters lurk in those brushpiles... O_O

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Accidents happen..a southbound hog got in the northbound lane. Happens every once in awhile. Give the guy the breathalyser.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Now that's a mouth full!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Amen Beekeeper !!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

there's something you don't see everyday.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Soooo, does that count as catching one fish, or two fish?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Woodstock wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I've had the good fortune to explore waters in Chile and Argentina where trout have literally never been fished. In those places, the big fish often acted like pike, and our tactics to catch them would acknowledge that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

A few years back in Northern Manitoba we caught walleye in the middle of the afternoon on poppers. It was a fish every cast til we tired of them.

Before that I had never seen a walleye that wasn't deep during the day.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

So all these years of catching rainbows on streamers and what I really should have been using was dry flies because rainbows don't eat other fish? I learn something new every day.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I'd say that trout bit off more than he can chew. I wouldn't release that guy, he ain't gonna make it...should have stuck with the bugs.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Does that mean we should be killing (as in eating ) the big trout to save the smaller ones? Some people support that hypothesis.

At night in Michigan waters I always worried more about what was on the banks than on the water ... but with these beaver attacks lately I am considering at least wearing a cup in the water. Do they make Kevlar waders?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe Demalderis wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Your theory on pounded trout and little bugs holds true by me. On the rivers I fish the trout on the heaviest hit parts often wont eat anything unless it's two sizes smaller than what's hatching. On other parts, I've seen spin guys nail big rainbows & browns routinely on Rapalas and the like. I think trout are predators, sometimes what they prey on changes. They are also opportunists and will prey on what's easiest, be it bugs, fish or whatever (I once saw a brown nail a frog bass style).

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

MLH That ain't no beaver! That's a Michigan Wolverine!.. meaner than a junk yard dog, and can whip a Spartan any day. I'd say those guys had a lot of fun contriving that picture.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fflutterffly wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Predation is not only limited to the great northwest or even the mid-west. Here on the Kern River Guy Jeans, guide and owner of Kern River Trout Fishing had a similar catch while wading the upper section of the river. Though I don't have a photo it was a tail to mouth take with a nice 18" Bow sucking down a smaller cuz.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

When I was growing up my dad told me this was a dog eat dog world, boy was he wrong, it really is a fish eat fish world. I bet that the rainbow was saying, thats the last time I will open my big mouth during the anual running of the browns.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

18" is a good estimate when trout turn to mainly feeding on other fish, and bigger hunks of protein than bugs...to much calories used up for the protein taken in consuming bugs. They can't get their daily needs. Much easier to rest much of the day saving calories and energy, and then consume a bigger meal at the preferred time..brown trout of that size and bigger, are notorious for that, and eat during low light, early morning, or evening/nite conditions. Some guys out here camp out in our canyon on the SF during Oct. and swing streamers off the gravel bars at nite (timing full moon conditions) into the deeper water and catch some huge browns chasing smaller fish into the shallows. Very few of these fish are caught during the daylight hours all Summer long.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

BS Photo....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

WA Hunter...I agree with you. Look at that smurk on the guys face in the background...he looks like the architect.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

If you ever cleaned a trout, you would see that it's digestive tract is not large enough to handle a trout that size. This is one you will have to prove to me before I believe it. Either photoshopped or shoved down it's gullet.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Brendan wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Haha he looks so confused

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from streamer74 wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

WA mtn hunter and Sayfu- I know the guide in this photo and this was not photoshopped or shoved down his throat. Not sure that a boat full of paying clients would think it's very kosher or that it would be good PR for the guide service to do such a thing. Maybe you should go clean some more trout to re-investigate their internal workings and digestive systems. I've caught 15" cutthroat in BC that have been taken head first by 25" bulls down the tail and laneded that way...yes, only a 10" difference in size. It's not that uncommon.. It is possible and it does happen. The fish in the picture actually ate a size 10 dry fly off the surface with this fish in his mouth. Since you seem to be a fish biologist please explain this to me. Oh, and Sayfu, Do you ever smirk and smile and show emotion when you're out fishing on a beautiful river and something cool just happened? Just curious

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

i have to wonder how that fish would have been able or even interestd in a fly with his mouth so full. something not right about the whole story. sorry, not convinced.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Streamer,
To satisfy your curiosity, I smirk, and smile, all the time, but it has no relation to whether anything was true, or not. Can an individual fish commit an act of stupidity like a lot of humans commit all the time? I would think so. I once saw a fish at a weigh in that won a fishing contest, and when they cleaned it, the stupid fish had eaten several pretty good size lead sinkers!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Larry Harvey wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I caught the fish in the picture. My friend in the back of the boat, who is not an architect by the way, netted the fish. After he removed my parachute adams he noticed what he thought was another fly broken off in the fish. He took his foreceps and proceeded to pull the other fish out. The tail was not visible initially. We were rather surprised by this- it seems you mistake smirks for laughter. We returned the fish to the water and he swam away with his meal intact. Why this fish thought he needed to eat a #10 adams is beyond me- dessert?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I think the truth of the story is in the confrontation that went on before you fly hooked that fish. That smaller fish was one tough dude, and he confronted the bigger fella telling him he was going to tear his heart out, and was doing just that when you caught the guy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigjake wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Ive seen a similiar situation, but on a smaller scale.I once caught a 12" brookie that had a 7" brookie stuck in its throat....didnt seem to bother it enough to keep it off my panther martin

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from theSenator wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I am not an architect, but I have seen a few billfish caught and they occasionally throw-up their stomachs in the process of being hooked and played. It may be possible that this is what happened with this fish. It ate the fly, then partially regurgitated the contents of its stomach during the fight. Just a thought for all the fish biologists on this thread....

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Senator, You guys validate the thought I have had for a long, long time, and that is the fact that fly anglers are very visual. They are very observant of their surroundings more so than bait, and hardware fisherman...but along with that goes a vivid imagination. I've listened to flyfishermen tell of swimming with fish, and learning to think like one...know why they took a fly like a bunch of undulating marabou taking it for a leach, even taking the undulating leach eating an egg if the color was egg like at the head of the undulating marabou. Gotta make fishing a lot more fun. I still think there could be sharks in my river in Idaho if I fell in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Accidents happen..a southbound hog got in the northbound lane. Happens every once in awhile. Give the guy the breathalyser.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Those Michigan rivers are crazy- Monsters lurk in those brushpiles... O_O

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

there's something you don't see everyday.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from streamer74 wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

WA mtn hunter and Sayfu- I know the guide in this photo and this was not photoshopped or shoved down his throat. Not sure that a boat full of paying clients would think it's very kosher or that it would be good PR for the guide service to do such a thing. Maybe you should go clean some more trout to re-investigate their internal workings and digestive systems. I've caught 15" cutthroat in BC that have been taken head first by 25" bulls down the tail and laneded that way...yes, only a 10" difference in size. It's not that uncommon.. It is possible and it does happen. The fish in the picture actually ate a size 10 dry fly off the surface with this fish in his mouth. Since you seem to be a fish biologist please explain this to me. Oh, and Sayfu, Do you ever smirk and smile and show emotion when you're out fishing on a beautiful river and something cool just happened? Just curious

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Larry Harvey wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I caught the fish in the picture. My friend in the back of the boat, who is not an architect by the way, netted the fish. After he removed my parachute adams he noticed what he thought was another fly broken off in the fish. He took his foreceps and proceeded to pull the other fish out. The tail was not visible initially. We were rather surprised by this- it seems you mistake smirks for laughter. We returned the fish to the water and he swam away with his meal intact. Why this fish thought he needed to eat a #10 adams is beyond me- dessert?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigjake wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Ive seen a similiar situation, but on a smaller scale.I once caught a 12" brookie that had a 7" brookie stuck in its throat....didnt seem to bother it enough to keep it off my panther martin

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Now that's a mouth full!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Soooo, does that count as catching one fish, or two fish?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

So all these years of catching rainbows on streamers and what I really should have been using was dry flies because rainbows don't eat other fish? I learn something new every day.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I'd say that trout bit off more than he can chew. I wouldn't release that guy, he ain't gonna make it...should have stuck with the bugs.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Does that mean we should be killing (as in eating ) the big trout to save the smaller ones? Some people support that hypothesis.

At night in Michigan waters I always worried more about what was on the banks than on the water ... but with these beaver attacks lately I am considering at least wearing a cup in the water. Do they make Kevlar waders?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe Demalderis wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Your theory on pounded trout and little bugs holds true by me. On the rivers I fish the trout on the heaviest hit parts often wont eat anything unless it's two sizes smaller than what's hatching. On other parts, I've seen spin guys nail big rainbows & browns routinely on Rapalas and the like. I think trout are predators, sometimes what they prey on changes. They are also opportunists and will prey on what's easiest, be it bugs, fish or whatever (I once saw a brown nail a frog bass style).

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from fflutterffly wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Predation is not only limited to the great northwest or even the mid-west. Here on the Kern River Guy Jeans, guide and owner of Kern River Trout Fishing had a similar catch while wading the upper section of the river. Though I don't have a photo it was a tail to mouth take with a nice 18" Bow sucking down a smaller cuz.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

18" is a good estimate when trout turn to mainly feeding on other fish, and bigger hunks of protein than bugs...to much calories used up for the protein taken in consuming bugs. They can't get their daily needs. Much easier to rest much of the day saving calories and energy, and then consume a bigger meal at the preferred time..brown trout of that size and bigger, are notorious for that, and eat during low light, early morning, or evening/nite conditions. Some guys out here camp out in our canyon on the SF during Oct. and swing streamers off the gravel bars at nite (timing full moon conditions) into the deeper water and catch some huge browns chasing smaller fish into the shallows. Very few of these fish are caught during the daylight hours all Summer long.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Streamer,
To satisfy your curiosity, I smirk, and smile, all the time, but it has no relation to whether anything was true, or not. Can an individual fish commit an act of stupidity like a lot of humans commit all the time? I would think so. I once saw a fish at a weigh in that won a fishing contest, and when they cleaned it, the stupid fish had eaten several pretty good size lead sinkers!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from theSenator wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I am not an architect, but I have seen a few billfish caught and they occasionally throw-up their stomachs in the process of being hooked and played. It may be possible that this is what happened with this fish. It ate the fly, then partially regurgitated the contents of its stomach during the fight. Just a thought for all the fish biologists on this thread....

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Amen Beekeeper !!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Woodstock wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I've had the good fortune to explore waters in Chile and Argentina where trout have literally never been fished. In those places, the big fish often acted like pike, and our tactics to catch them would acknowledge that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

A few years back in Northern Manitoba we caught walleye in the middle of the afternoon on poppers. It was a fish every cast til we tired of them.

Before that I had never seen a walleye that wasn't deep during the day.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

MLH That ain't no beaver! That's a Michigan Wolverine!.. meaner than a junk yard dog, and can whip a Spartan any day. I'd say those guys had a lot of fun contriving that picture.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

When I was growing up my dad told me this was a dog eat dog world, boy was he wrong, it really is a fish eat fish world. I bet that the rainbow was saying, thats the last time I will open my big mouth during the anual running of the browns.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

BS Photo....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

WA Hunter...I agree with you. Look at that smurk on the guys face in the background...he looks like the architect.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Brendan wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

Haha he looks so confused

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

i have to wonder how that fish would have been able or even interestd in a fly with his mouth so full. something not right about the whole story. sorry, not convinced.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

I think the truth of the story is in the confrontation that went on before you fly hooked that fish. That smaller fish was one tough dude, and he confronted the bigger fella telling him he was going to tear his heart out, and was doing just that when you caught the guy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 40 weeks ago

Senator, You guys validate the thought I have had for a long, long time, and that is the fact that fly anglers are very visual. They are very observant of their surroundings more so than bait, and hardware fisherman...but along with that goes a vivid imagination. I've listened to flyfishermen tell of swimming with fish, and learning to think like one...know why they took a fly like a bunch of undulating marabou taking it for a leach, even taking the undulating leach eating an egg if the color was egg like at the head of the undulating marabou. Gotta make fishing a lot more fun. I still think there could be sharks in my river in Idaho if I fell in.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

If you ever cleaned a trout, you would see that it's digestive tract is not large enough to handle a trout that size. This is one you will have to prove to me before I believe it. Either photoshopped or shoved down it's gullet.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs