Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Time To Ditch the Strike Indicator?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 28, 2011

Time To Ditch the Strike Indicator?

By Kirk Deeter

There's a lot of interest these days in making fly fishing simpler and more accessible for the masses. I certainly buy into the notion that success breeds interest, and I like getting people fired up about a sport I love.

No doubt that fishing a double-nymph rig under a strike indicator is deadly effective. Which is why 99% of guides out West will start the day by handing the client a rod rigged for "dredging" up trout.

But is that really a good thing? On further review, I'm starting to think that this manic dedication to playing "bobber ball" doesn't really shine the best light on fly fishing. Let's be honest. Fly fishing's essence is about complex currents and hatching insects, traditions and techniques. This is supposed to be a fascinating intellectual challenge. And yet, nymph fishing with indicators is pretty mindless. On the simple-stupid scale, it's right there with worm fishing under a bobber... only worm fishing with a bobber is much more exciting, because that usually involves a little kid who's totally giddy.

I know of people who hired a guide for their introduction to fly fishing, spent the day nymph fishing, caught some fish, and still left thinking, "That's it?" No dry fly rises... no casting fancy loops... just bobber fishing.

I understand that catching fish is what brings the tips. And when you're out there on a river during your own precious time, you want to catch fish. If that means nymphing with a bobber, more power to you. But maybe some pros should worry less about pounding fish, and actually teach fly fishing. Maybe if we all ditched the bobber a little more often, we'd get more out of our time on the rivers. And maybe inspiring people to think a little more... even if that means less hookups... might actually do more for the sport.

Just a thought...

Comments (42)

Top Rated
All Comments
from ckRich wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Amen. Really, who doesn't love watching a fish rise two feet off the bottom just to slam that size 16 setter/deer/cigarette butt fly that you tied up last night?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I don't care either way, but you sure won't see me using them in most cases....You seem to like to ride the line of do, don't on the ease of entry and success into this niche of fishing.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

You're right Koldkut, I wrestle with that. I guess where I am now is that simple is great when you're starting... but a guide who just slings bobbers all day... that's just lazy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I say there are times when they are necessary but agree they are to often used as a crutch to help beginners. I only carry them in my steelhead pack. As I have explained before, they are a great tool to prevent snagging in heavy pods of fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rendyboats wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

a fly and a bobber, i can and have done that with my regular rod. but i would still like to learn how to cast a fly rod and fish a fly the way it was ment to be fished.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ejunk wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I disagree with this and here is why: if you stick to the water that you can reach and high stick or tight line that same double nymph rig, it's just as effective (assuming you're using the right flies). all the indicator does is open up more water and dumb it down slightly. it's also less tiring, I guess.

and seriously now, "bobber fishing" is a bit strong. it's not like two nymphs and an indicator are some magic ticket to fish. you still have to cast that monstrosity and get the drift right. it's a far cry from a mealworm on a hook under a bobber in a farm pond.

lastly - have you ever tried to fish one of those old timey wet fly rigs? 4 or 5 large, garish wet flies strung together and swung through the current? that method can be pretty deadly, too, and thanks to the size and color of a lot of those traditional wets, you can watch it all happen. it's 1/8th of a step from indicator fishing, at best, and it's about 100 years older, to boot.

personally, I fish a dry fly whenever possible, but an indicator is just one more tool in my fly box that I'll sometimes use if the situation warrants. If you really want to criticize an angler, criticize him/her for never trying anything new. how boring is that?

yrs-
Evan!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Pacific Hunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My take is that what pushes away others trying to get into the sport is the mentality us fly fishermen tend to have. Somebody pulls out a photo of a great trout and when you ask them what it came on and they reveal a San Juan did the trick you snicker. Don't comment "Oh, I fished on top all day" The root of this sport is trying to imitate a food item with fur and feather. If you don't like "bobbers" don't fish them, but don't judge those around you that do. In terms of a guide, they try to judge what the client wants out of the day, it may involve nymphing to a dozen trout,or drifting a dry to a native single fish. No matter how hard they try, they aren't going to be able to read everyone correctly. Just because one person finds great satisfaction in throwing a perfect loop to a rising trout doesn't mean that is the only satisfaction there is to be had in the sport.

+9 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

i don't use them because i really have never learned to rig and cast them right. i also won't criticise someone for doing it. that's just me, though.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from tkbone wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I started out using indicators to learn how to fish with nymphs but I eventually progressed beyond them. Ideally, that would be every indicator fisherman's goal, but I can certainly understand the desire to make sure you catch something if you're spending big bucks on a fishing trip or your livelihood depends on making sure someone else of limited experience catches some fish. To each his own.

Of course, the other benefit strike indicators provide is that they give the snobby fly fishing elitist an easy way to distinguish himself from the "newbie"/ "novice"/"poser" who just caught a fish downstream and feel better about his own skills.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

tkbone, the snobbiest guys on the water have indicators......

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Tkbone, to add......at least here in Colorado.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I do not believe Deeter's post was about snobbery as much as learning to fly fish.

I think the point he is making is that a lot of people fly fish but few learn how to.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from prairieghost wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"I'll give you my thingamabobber when you take it from my cold, dead hands!"
OR
"If thingamabobbers are outlawed, only outlaws will have thingamabobbers."
OR
People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Rodney King

Seriously, Pacific Hunter said it well.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Exactly buckhunter.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The attitude you display in your writing is why lots of people don't like fly fishing. Fly fishing may be about "complex currents and hatching insects, traditions and techniques" for you but for many anglers it is about catching fish. Also about the beauty of rivers, the complexity of ecosystems, the life cycles of insects etc. but essentially about catching fish. Because you have chosen to emphasize less tangible, intellectual dimensions of the sport doesn't give you the right to denigrate the actions and efforts of people who fly fish to you know, catch fish, even if it means using a tiny bit of orange putty on the line to help them detect strikes.
I suppose if a client asked a guide to teach him dry fly fishing and he refused you might call him lazy. Most of the times I hired a guide it was so he would take me out to catch a bunch of fish. When I wanted to learn how to dry fly fish I asked my buddies and also took lessons.So it wouldn't take away from the time we spent on the river when we were there to catch fish. I think that people would think a lot more of fly fishing if they saw it as just another really fun way to catch fish and didn't have to worry about people giving them grief for how they were fishing.
So the next time you are standing in complex currents musing on whether to fish a #20 or #22 midge on a hand-tied gut leader, silk tippet and split bamboo 2 weight, remember that the guy in the next pool with the box store combo and a wad of orange on his line is there to catch some fish and have a great time doing it. Nothing stupid about that.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WVOtter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I would venture to say anyone who has hired a guide and paid the costs of such a trip is happily willing to use an indicator and spend 4-8 hours catching fish rather than learn on the fly how to detect a strike for a period of that time for a slow day. I would also make the arguement that using indicators PROMOTE learning. There are so many intricate details to fly fishing, especially when going in blind to a new region with new entomology. An indicator helps a fisherman (at any level) to quickly evaluate what is successful w/o worrying about whether they are missing strikes. I know I'm in that middle ground of knowing enough to be dangerous, as they say, and like using an idicator because it allows me to find out quickly whether my prince nymph is doing the trick, or whether I should tie on a hare's ear, or adjust my depth (another benefit, can detect if you're on the bottom or not) or whatever w/o second guessing whether the fish are taking it and I am just missing it since I haven't honed that skill. So I don't think it's snobbery or something one should be ashamed of...but do think it shallows out the learning curve and helps promote learning rather than inducing frustration.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The guides use them because most of their clients can't fly fish. It makes for an easy day for the guide. Bores the heck out of me, and I seldom if ever use one, BUT...they are more than just watching a bobber...they present the nymph at the desired level.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Ever since I got the flyrod combo you guys sent me a couple years back, I been trying to learn how to flyfish with it...some days I catch fish, most days I don't.
The way I see it is, Hey- I'm out there...so what if I'm standing barefoot in the glass-filled DesPlaines river, or pulling a hook from my left buttcheek next to the Kankakee, I'm out there, and I'm enjoying every last minute of it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Blue Ox.."Some days I catch fish, other days I don't" That same thing is true about those that think they are good. The one's that tell the truth anyway.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Just like crossbows vs. traditional, I don't think we need to add any kind of division to our ranks.
Sometimes I use them, sometimes not, but to imply laziness towards a fellow angler just causes division, and fly fishing seems to have enough of that built in already.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"This is supposed to be a fascinating intellectual challenge."

It's not necessarily supposed to be. Fly fishing, like any fishing is whatever one wants it to be. It also doesn't have the monopoly on intellectuality (or whatever). Don't tell me John Merwin (among countless others) isn't intellectual about his fishing even if he's "being lazy" with "cheater gear". It's intellectual as much as one wants it to be. The point is that people need to get into at least some kind of fishing no matter what "the elites" (take that as a compliment) think of the technique. As long as they are enjoying and understanding the resource, I'm happy.

Bio 101 is pretty mindless too, but you still have to take it before you can take Entomology 403.

"it's a far cry from a mealworm on a hook under a bobber in a farm pond."

It is? I think it's about the same...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I know a few very good fly guys..guys that teach the sport of fly fishing that think a meal worm on a hook is a great past time, and fish that way from time to time..peace of mind, solitude, relaxing..it's all good. I enjoy it myself. And they use one of those .25cent red and white clip on bobbers as an essential part of their terminal tackle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe Demalderis wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Kirk, Shhhh, before you know everyone will be swinging wet flies... ;)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Hey, how come no one has mentioned the various ways indicaters can be used? Most of the discussion has focused on indicaters as "bobbers" but there are other applications as well( bottom bouncing comes to mind). Or an indy a couple feet away from a minute dry? What about the "curly" used by Euro anglers, technically an indicater? Dry/dropper makes the dry an indicater of sorts, too. I like to fish dries, sometimes to a fault, but I don't think it's good for fly fishing to get too dogmatic.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from casestevenson wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

the harder you work, the greater the reward. I've still never been fly fishing, but that doesn't sound half as fun. My first introduction to the existence of fly fishing was reading Zane Grey, and thats the feel I'm hoping to capture when I get out there this spring. none of this instant success. i wouldn't say its dogmatic, but tradition is a part of our heritage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fflutterffly wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

When you start a child hitting a baseball you place the ball on a T-bar. When teaching golf you place each ball on a Tee. It makes the learning simple and success breeds interest. The same is for fly fishing to the masses. There will be attrition BUT by using an indicator you learn to watch for the changes, which are more apparent. Next you learn to watch the whole line and finally you learn to follow the line insertion into the water. Indicators into themselves are not a 'bad thing', just a tool If you must, a gate way drug to addiction and the fine art of Fly Fishing

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ejunk wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

deeter and buckhunter - I still disagree. in the absence of a guide holding your hand and telling you where to drift an indicator/double nymph rig, that style of fishing is NOT easy and requires practice, patience and most of the same skills that an accomplished fly fisherman has at his disposal. you're wrong about this - indicator fishing is still fly fishing.

not everybody takes the same path - not everybody learns the same way and not everybody ends up in the same place. fly fishing is a journey, not a race. again, as I said earlier, fishing ONLY that way (or only ANY way) is silly and deserves to be poked fun at, but no one method rises above another.

yrs-
Evan!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Downer by starting out flyfishing using an indicator is the lack of enjoyment of casting. Laying out a dryline with a dry fly on the end is a pleasure that perks the interest. If you can cast using a yarn indicator, and a not much wt'd nymph that becomes close to casting with no indicator, and a dry, or a small nymph, but a plastic "Thingamabob" type?...no fun to cast, and guides generally use very big, visible strike indicators..in freestone waters anyway. You lob them right out of the water getting it out there but a little ways, and the boat is rowed along with the bobber.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

ejunk,

Indicator fishing is most definitely fly fishing. No argument here. In fact, fishing is fishing. I love it all.

I think Deeter loves to share his passion of fly fishing with others and only wishes for everyone to enjoy all it has to offer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from AJMcClure wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Last time I went fly fishing I left the strike indicator off and paid attention to my line, I was totally keyed in to what I was doing and blind to everything else in the world, then a drunken band of polaris ranger drivers decided that the shallow pool i was in was their only path to private land, beer cans drifted out of the back end, apologetic comments and waves from 2 piece swim suit wearing gals followed leaving me their. I wanted to head upstream, but my flyfishing brother said "its over." Duck-nuts and dry fly bums are great company, they are consumed in an attempt to recreate the moment where their masterful strategy and set up paid off big, as more of a generalist I go out with them to peek into their world, and every so often I share a moment that indoctrinates me into their brotherhood, where masterful calling, meticulous laying out a spread, or presenting just the right fly in just the right way creates such epiphanies. I came back to the stream with ultra light spinners and hauled out 32 lbs of whitebass. I get it, but I also get me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishpapa wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Indicator fly fishing is fly fishing and it is not a dumbed down version of the sport we love. When I was taught to fly fish I was taught to do it with a dry fly and as I flailed away catching a few dinks, my buddy/instructor, was puling hogs out on a double nymph rig. My point is, he made it clear that I had to be a really good caster and really be able to control my loop if I wanted to fish with such a set up. Now when I hit the water I always start out on top and if I can't get them there but I know they are in there then I rig up the nymphs, how is that any different than matching the hatch? I'm giving the fish what they want. I have several hard core dry fly friends who would never fish a nymph and we've agreed to disagree on the subject. I am just as intellectually challenged by enticing a strike on the top or on the bottom.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

For me, and again, the fun is in the casting. That is what separates my fun from the guy flippin a spinner, or a bait. Ain't no fun casting a clumsy strike indicator. I can't appreciate landing that fly right where I want to along the bank, and having good results. After so many fish caught, many fly guys want other pleasures besides just catching fish. But, to each his own. And for floating 8 miles of river? I can catch far more fish on a dry than nymph fishing on average..not even close. I don't have to match the hatch. Much of the time it is attractor patterns.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dougfish wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Casting an indicator is no fun for me. Especially if you have a big bead nymph in your combo rig. I won't judge others, but I don't want to swinging that around. I use the hint that was discussed months ago here. 18" of Amnesia line between my leader and fly line. Grease/silicon the end of your line and the Amnesia line. Re-grease as needed. Watch for the Amnesia line to tick or submerge and set the hook. Not getting deep enough? Add some tippet or more weight.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The big key for using an indicator most anglers miss. It controls the depth your nymphs fish. The fly drops much easier dropping below the indicator than having to get down a length of leader. I just don't like to cast them. An angler gave a hint awhile back here telling Deeter to "SHHHHH" fly guys will turn to swinging wets. Now that is fun, and I do it a lot. Casting is just like casting a dry...use a dry line, and a dry fly length of leader. I can cut off my soft hackle that I wet fly swing, and can have fun spey casting using it, and tie on a dry fly, same rig. Very productive, and fun to cast and fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shenvalley wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Fish what you want. If that means you never fish without a strike indicator then more power to you. The fact remains, what others think of you will not make you a better (or worse) fly fisherman. Their opinions won't put a fish on your fly.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kent_klewein wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Kirk,

I hear where your coming from. As a guide myself instruction comes first for all my clients. However, there comes a time when instruction and lack of fish to the net works against you with your clients and can turn them off from the sport just as much. That's why especially with beginners, I allow them to fish dry flies, nymph rigs, and streamers during the day. That way they get a glimpse of the big picture of the sport of fly fishing.

Unfortunately where I live, hatching bugs in densities conducive to dry fly fishing isn't always available during the year or on certain trout water. Furthermore, because of this, it's important for me to teach my clients how to nymph fish properly so they can still catch fish when the adult bugs aren't out and about. If the fish are looking down you better fishing down, you know?

In conclusion, it's important for beginners in the sport to learn all methods of fly fishing. Doing so will make them a more rounded fly angler.

Kent Klewein

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from mmiller wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

As much as I love dry fly fishing, nymphing does hold an important spot in our sport. When teaching my dad this year how to fly fish I immediately set him up with a nymph rig. Why you ask? Well he is a lifelong bass fisherman and didnt quite understand the fundamentels yet. Nymph fishing with an indicator allowed me to teach dead drifts without sacrificing the possibility of him catching a trout. Is it an easier way to catch fish? A style that requires less focus and skill? I'd have to say yes. We all have to start somewhere, and if i were to guess i'd say most of us fly fishermen started this addiction with one goal in mind- to catch fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I agree MMiller. I really dont like catching small fish myself. I Only fishing Steelies, and Salmon which spawn around where I live. I dont like Strike Indicators because I have noticed the fish seem to run away from them when they have had about 200 different colors thrown at them for 2 months. I found out watching My dad for about twenty years. He lands more fish than anybody I have seen before. He just uses Plain hook with a tiny peace of lead. hollow core. thats it. Every once and a while if the river has a little bit of mud from run off. He will put maybe a little egg. Thats only in the early run. but I could see why people would use Indicators for dry fly fishing. I love Wet Flies. Keep your line tight. MOre Fish!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I wonder, if strike indicators were called drift indicators instead, would they generate less dissent? Only when used to suspend the fly at a prescribed depth are they really "bobbers".Other than that they are a visual cue that something is going on subsurface.Yes, they can be a pain to cast, but so can streamers, or heavily wieghted nymphs, and most fisherman use a bigger indicator than they really need anyway. The smallest (1/2") thingamabobber will hold up all but the heaviest nymphs. Even when fishing a suspended fly at a right angle, the indicator has to be fished drag-free in most situations, and that involves the art of mending, which takes time, practice, and an understanding of how current works to be effective. Will a fish take a nymph when it's dragging? Sometimes. Will a fish take a dry fly when it's dragging? Yeah, sometimes. It's still a fly-caught fish. The notion that indicator fishing is somehow less pure than other techniques is baloney. The appeal of dry fly fishing is the visual element, but seeing an indicator pause, quiver, or dip is (almost) as much fun. An indicator doesn't even have to float to serve its purpose, it just has to be visible. The guy who takes fish by nymphing with nothing more than focus and "fish sense" is truly an angler of the highest order. For my money, that's the most difficult form of fly fishing. For the rest of us, there are strike indicators.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from badsmerf wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Wow, didn't know this is such a touchy subject. Feels like english snobbery to discriminate against indicators.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from elkomike wrote 1 year 27 weeks ago

Something else to think about when using an indicator.

I've lost a number of large fish recently when they broke tippets up to 3x flouro. Earlier this year I was hooking and landing large trout, and all of a sudden I couldn't do it.

What changed? I believe two things are causing my problems. First (physics thing) I switched from a 5-wt rig to a 7-wt rig. Not only is the rod stiffer but there is a greater moment of inertia on the 7-wt reel. AND I started using a Thingamabobber indicator, handy but they have a good deal of resistance when a rampaging trout drags them through the water. So, and I'm not sure of the main cause yet, all of these things stack up to create a good deal of force on the tippet when a large trout tries to shake the fly loose.

My belief is that some indicators may make it tougher to land the large trout it helps you to catch.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tacomanusmc wrote 1 year 27 weeks ago

Sounds like some of you think that just because I use an indicator I'm not as good of a fisherman as you. I've actually been told that while I was fishing Lake Taneycomo on my first fly fishing trip. And the snobbery that went along with that remark almost soured me on the sport. But I could care less. I'm 100% self taught, and I routinely catch more, and larger fish than the folks who tell me I'm doing it wrong by using an indicator. Sure, it's great watching a big fish rise to your perfectly drifted dry, but it's just as good seeing your indicator jerk to the side or disappear. If you want to make excuses about "loving the process and history," then by all means, keep flinging that dry fly and get skunked while I dredge the water with my indicator and catch fish until my arms are sore. That's my piece for the night.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Pacific Hunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My take is that what pushes away others trying to get into the sport is the mentality us fly fishermen tend to have. Somebody pulls out a photo of a great trout and when you ask them what it came on and they reveal a San Juan did the trick you snicker. Don't comment "Oh, I fished on top all day" The root of this sport is trying to imitate a food item with fur and feather. If you don't like "bobbers" don't fish them, but don't judge those around you that do. In terms of a guide, they try to judge what the client wants out of the day, it may involve nymphing to a dozen trout,or drifting a dry to a native single fish. No matter how hard they try, they aren't going to be able to read everyone correctly. Just because one person finds great satisfaction in throwing a perfect loop to a rising trout doesn't mean that is the only satisfaction there is to be had in the sport.

+9 Good Comment? | | Report
from tkbone wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I started out using indicators to learn how to fish with nymphs but I eventually progressed beyond them. Ideally, that would be every indicator fisherman's goal, but I can certainly understand the desire to make sure you catch something if you're spending big bucks on a fishing trip or your livelihood depends on making sure someone else of limited experience catches some fish. To each his own.

Of course, the other benefit strike indicators provide is that they give the snobby fly fishing elitist an easy way to distinguish himself from the "newbie"/ "novice"/"poser" who just caught a fish downstream and feel better about his own skills.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from ejunk wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I disagree with this and here is why: if you stick to the water that you can reach and high stick or tight line that same double nymph rig, it's just as effective (assuming you're using the right flies). all the indicator does is open up more water and dumb it down slightly. it's also less tiring, I guess.

and seriously now, "bobber fishing" is a bit strong. it's not like two nymphs and an indicator are some magic ticket to fish. you still have to cast that monstrosity and get the drift right. it's a far cry from a mealworm on a hook under a bobber in a farm pond.

lastly - have you ever tried to fish one of those old timey wet fly rigs? 4 or 5 large, garish wet flies strung together and swung through the current? that method can be pretty deadly, too, and thanks to the size and color of a lot of those traditional wets, you can watch it all happen. it's 1/8th of a step from indicator fishing, at best, and it's about 100 years older, to boot.

personally, I fish a dry fly whenever possible, but an indicator is just one more tool in my fly box that I'll sometimes use if the situation warrants. If you really want to criticize an angler, criticize him/her for never trying anything new. how boring is that?

yrs-
Evan!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

i don't use them because i really have never learned to rig and cast them right. i also won't criticise someone for doing it. that's just me, though.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The attitude you display in your writing is why lots of people don't like fly fishing. Fly fishing may be about "complex currents and hatching insects, traditions and techniques" for you but for many anglers it is about catching fish. Also about the beauty of rivers, the complexity of ecosystems, the life cycles of insects etc. but essentially about catching fish. Because you have chosen to emphasize less tangible, intellectual dimensions of the sport doesn't give you the right to denigrate the actions and efforts of people who fly fish to you know, catch fish, even if it means using a tiny bit of orange putty on the line to help them detect strikes.
I suppose if a client asked a guide to teach him dry fly fishing and he refused you might call him lazy. Most of the times I hired a guide it was so he would take me out to catch a bunch of fish. When I wanted to learn how to dry fly fish I asked my buddies and also took lessons.So it wouldn't take away from the time we spent on the river when we were there to catch fish. I think that people would think a lot more of fly fishing if they saw it as just another really fun way to catch fish and didn't have to worry about people giving them grief for how they were fishing.
So the next time you are standing in complex currents musing on whether to fish a #20 or #22 midge on a hand-tied gut leader, silk tippet and split bamboo 2 weight, remember that the guy in the next pool with the box store combo and a wad of orange on his line is there to catch some fish and have a great time doing it. Nothing stupid about that.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Ever since I got the flyrod combo you guys sent me a couple years back, I been trying to learn how to flyfish with it...some days I catch fish, most days I don't.
The way I see it is, Hey- I'm out there...so what if I'm standing barefoot in the glass-filled DesPlaines river, or pulling a hook from my left buttcheek next to the Kankakee, I'm out there, and I'm enjoying every last minute of it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

You're right Koldkut, I wrestle with that. I guess where I am now is that simple is great when you're starting... but a guide who just slings bobbers all day... that's just lazy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from prairieghost wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"I'll give you my thingamabobber when you take it from my cold, dead hands!"
OR
"If thingamabobbers are outlawed, only outlaws will have thingamabobbers."
OR
People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Rodney King

Seriously, Pacific Hunter said it well.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WVOtter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I would venture to say anyone who has hired a guide and paid the costs of such a trip is happily willing to use an indicator and spend 4-8 hours catching fish rather than learn on the fly how to detect a strike for a period of that time for a slow day. I would also make the arguement that using indicators PROMOTE learning. There are so many intricate details to fly fishing, especially when going in blind to a new region with new entomology. An indicator helps a fisherman (at any level) to quickly evaluate what is successful w/o worrying about whether they are missing strikes. I know I'm in that middle ground of knowing enough to be dangerous, as they say, and like using an idicator because it allows me to find out quickly whether my prince nymph is doing the trick, or whether I should tie on a hare's ear, or adjust my depth (another benefit, can detect if you're on the bottom or not) or whatever w/o second guessing whether the fish are taking it and I am just missing it since I haven't honed that skill. So I don't think it's snobbery or something one should be ashamed of...but do think it shallows out the learning curve and helps promote learning rather than inducing frustration.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Just like crossbows vs. traditional, I don't think we need to add any kind of division to our ranks.
Sometimes I use them, sometimes not, but to imply laziness towards a fellow angler just causes division, and fly fishing seems to have enough of that built in already.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I know a few very good fly guys..guys that teach the sport of fly fishing that think a meal worm on a hook is a great past time, and fish that way from time to time..peace of mind, solitude, relaxing..it's all good. I enjoy it myself. And they use one of those .25cent red and white clip on bobbers as an essential part of their terminal tackle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fflutterffly wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

When you start a child hitting a baseball you place the ball on a T-bar. When teaching golf you place each ball on a Tee. It makes the learning simple and success breeds interest. The same is for fly fishing to the masses. There will be attrition BUT by using an indicator you learn to watch for the changes, which are more apparent. Next you learn to watch the whole line and finally you learn to follow the line insertion into the water. Indicators into themselves are not a 'bad thing', just a tool If you must, a gate way drug to addiction and the fine art of Fly Fishing

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ejunk wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

deeter and buckhunter - I still disagree. in the absence of a guide holding your hand and telling you where to drift an indicator/double nymph rig, that style of fishing is NOT easy and requires practice, patience and most of the same skills that an accomplished fly fisherman has at his disposal. you're wrong about this - indicator fishing is still fly fishing.

not everybody takes the same path - not everybody learns the same way and not everybody ends up in the same place. fly fishing is a journey, not a race. again, as I said earlier, fishing ONLY that way (or only ANY way) is silly and deserves to be poked fun at, but no one method rises above another.

yrs-
Evan!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I wonder, if strike indicators were called drift indicators instead, would they generate less dissent? Only when used to suspend the fly at a prescribed depth are they really "bobbers".Other than that they are a visual cue that something is going on subsurface.Yes, they can be a pain to cast, but so can streamers, or heavily wieghted nymphs, and most fisherman use a bigger indicator than they really need anyway. The smallest (1/2") thingamabobber will hold up all but the heaviest nymphs. Even when fishing a suspended fly at a right angle, the indicator has to be fished drag-free in most situations, and that involves the art of mending, which takes time, practice, and an understanding of how current works to be effective. Will a fish take a nymph when it's dragging? Sometimes. Will a fish take a dry fly when it's dragging? Yeah, sometimes. It's still a fly-caught fish. The notion that indicator fishing is somehow less pure than other techniques is baloney. The appeal of dry fly fishing is the visual element, but seeing an indicator pause, quiver, or dip is (almost) as much fun. An indicator doesn't even have to float to serve its purpose, it just has to be visible. The guy who takes fish by nymphing with nothing more than focus and "fish sense" is truly an angler of the highest order. For my money, that's the most difficult form of fly fishing. For the rest of us, there are strike indicators.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I don't care either way, but you sure won't see me using them in most cases....You seem to like to ride the line of do, don't on the ease of entry and success into this niche of fishing.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I say there are times when they are necessary but agree they are to often used as a crutch to help beginners. I only carry them in my steelhead pack. As I have explained before, they are a great tool to prevent snagging in heavy pods of fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

tkbone, the snobbiest guys on the water have indicators......

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I do not believe Deeter's post was about snobbery as much as learning to fly fish.

I think the point he is making is that a lot of people fly fish but few learn how to.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Exactly buckhunter.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Blue Ox.."Some days I catch fish, other days I don't" That same thing is true about those that think they are good. The one's that tell the truth anyway.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Hey, how come no one has mentioned the various ways indicaters can be used? Most of the discussion has focused on indicaters as "bobbers" but there are other applications as well( bottom bouncing comes to mind). Or an indy a couple feet away from a minute dry? What about the "curly" used by Euro anglers, technically an indicater? Dry/dropper makes the dry an indicater of sorts, too. I like to fish dries, sometimes to a fault, but I don't think it's good for fly fishing to get too dogmatic.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from AJMcClure wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Last time I went fly fishing I left the strike indicator off and paid attention to my line, I was totally keyed in to what I was doing and blind to everything else in the world, then a drunken band of polaris ranger drivers decided that the shallow pool i was in was their only path to private land, beer cans drifted out of the back end, apologetic comments and waves from 2 piece swim suit wearing gals followed leaving me their. I wanted to head upstream, but my flyfishing brother said "its over." Duck-nuts and dry fly bums are great company, they are consumed in an attempt to recreate the moment where their masterful strategy and set up paid off big, as more of a generalist I go out with them to peek into their world, and every so often I share a moment that indoctrinates me into their brotherhood, where masterful calling, meticulous laying out a spread, or presenting just the right fly in just the right way creates such epiphanies. I came back to the stream with ultra light spinners and hauled out 32 lbs of whitebass. I get it, but I also get me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishpapa wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Indicator fly fishing is fly fishing and it is not a dumbed down version of the sport we love. When I was taught to fly fish I was taught to do it with a dry fly and as I flailed away catching a few dinks, my buddy/instructor, was puling hogs out on a double nymph rig. My point is, he made it clear that I had to be a really good caster and really be able to control my loop if I wanted to fish with such a set up. Now when I hit the water I always start out on top and if I can't get them there but I know they are in there then I rig up the nymphs, how is that any different than matching the hatch? I'm giving the fish what they want. I have several hard core dry fly friends who would never fish a nymph and we've agreed to disagree on the subject. I am just as intellectually challenged by enticing a strike on the top or on the bottom.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shenvalley wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Fish what you want. If that means you never fish without a strike indicator then more power to you. The fact remains, what others think of you will not make you a better (or worse) fly fisherman. Their opinions won't put a fish on your fly.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kent_klewein wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Kirk,

I hear where your coming from. As a guide myself instruction comes first for all my clients. However, there comes a time when instruction and lack of fish to the net works against you with your clients and can turn them off from the sport just as much. That's why especially with beginners, I allow them to fish dry flies, nymph rigs, and streamers during the day. That way they get a glimpse of the big picture of the sport of fly fishing.

Unfortunately where I live, hatching bugs in densities conducive to dry fly fishing isn't always available during the year or on certain trout water. Furthermore, because of this, it's important for me to teach my clients how to nymph fish properly so they can still catch fish when the adult bugs aren't out and about. If the fish are looking down you better fishing down, you know?

In conclusion, it's important for beginners in the sport to learn all methods of fly fishing. Doing so will make them a more rounded fly angler.

Kent Klewein

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from mmiller wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

As much as I love dry fly fishing, nymphing does hold an important spot in our sport. When teaching my dad this year how to fly fish I immediately set him up with a nymph rig. Why you ask? Well he is a lifelong bass fisherman and didnt quite understand the fundamentels yet. Nymph fishing with an indicator allowed me to teach dead drifts without sacrificing the possibility of him catching a trout. Is it an easier way to catch fish? A style that requires less focus and skill? I'd have to say yes. We all have to start somewhere, and if i were to guess i'd say most of us fly fishermen started this addiction with one goal in mind- to catch fish.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ckRich wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Amen. Really, who doesn't love watching a fish rise two feet off the bottom just to slam that size 16 setter/deer/cigarette butt fly that you tied up last night?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rendyboats wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

a fly and a bobber, i can and have done that with my regular rod. but i would still like to learn how to cast a fly rod and fish a fly the way it was ment to be fished.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Tkbone, to add......at least here in Colorado.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The guides use them because most of their clients can't fly fish. It makes for an easy day for the guide. Bores the heck out of me, and I seldom if ever use one, BUT...they are more than just watching a bobber...they present the nymph at the desired level.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"This is supposed to be a fascinating intellectual challenge."

It's not necessarily supposed to be. Fly fishing, like any fishing is whatever one wants it to be. It also doesn't have the monopoly on intellectuality (or whatever). Don't tell me John Merwin (among countless others) isn't intellectual about his fishing even if he's "being lazy" with "cheater gear". It's intellectual as much as one wants it to be. The point is that people need to get into at least some kind of fishing no matter what "the elites" (take that as a compliment) think of the technique. As long as they are enjoying and understanding the resource, I'm happy.

Bio 101 is pretty mindless too, but you still have to take it before you can take Entomology 403.

"it's a far cry from a mealworm on a hook under a bobber in a farm pond."

It is? I think it's about the same...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe Demalderis wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Kirk, Shhhh, before you know everyone will be swinging wet flies... ;)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from casestevenson wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

the harder you work, the greater the reward. I've still never been fly fishing, but that doesn't sound half as fun. My first introduction to the existence of fly fishing was reading Zane Grey, and thats the feel I'm hoping to capture when I get out there this spring. none of this instant success. i wouldn't say its dogmatic, but tradition is a part of our heritage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Downer by starting out flyfishing using an indicator is the lack of enjoyment of casting. Laying out a dryline with a dry fly on the end is a pleasure that perks the interest. If you can cast using a yarn indicator, and a not much wt'd nymph that becomes close to casting with no indicator, and a dry, or a small nymph, but a plastic "Thingamabob" type?...no fun to cast, and guides generally use very big, visible strike indicators..in freestone waters anyway. You lob them right out of the water getting it out there but a little ways, and the boat is rowed along with the bobber.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

ejunk,

Indicator fishing is most definitely fly fishing. No argument here. In fact, fishing is fishing. I love it all.

I think Deeter loves to share his passion of fly fishing with others and only wishes for everyone to enjoy all it has to offer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

For me, and again, the fun is in the casting. That is what separates my fun from the guy flippin a spinner, or a bait. Ain't no fun casting a clumsy strike indicator. I can't appreciate landing that fly right where I want to along the bank, and having good results. After so many fish caught, many fly guys want other pleasures besides just catching fish. But, to each his own. And for floating 8 miles of river? I can catch far more fish on a dry than nymph fishing on average..not even close. I don't have to match the hatch. Much of the time it is attractor patterns.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dougfish wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Casting an indicator is no fun for me. Especially if you have a big bead nymph in your combo rig. I won't judge others, but I don't want to swinging that around. I use the hint that was discussed months ago here. 18" of Amnesia line between my leader and fly line. Grease/silicon the end of your line and the Amnesia line. Re-grease as needed. Watch for the Amnesia line to tick or submerge and set the hook. Not getting deep enough? Add some tippet or more weight.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The big key for using an indicator most anglers miss. It controls the depth your nymphs fish. The fly drops much easier dropping below the indicator than having to get down a length of leader. I just don't like to cast them. An angler gave a hint awhile back here telling Deeter to "SHHHHH" fly guys will turn to swinging wets. Now that is fun, and I do it a lot. Casting is just like casting a dry...use a dry line, and a dry fly length of leader. I can cut off my soft hackle that I wet fly swing, and can have fun spey casting using it, and tie on a dry fly, same rig. Very productive, and fun to cast and fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I agree MMiller. I really dont like catching small fish myself. I Only fishing Steelies, and Salmon which spawn around where I live. I dont like Strike Indicators because I have noticed the fish seem to run away from them when they have had about 200 different colors thrown at them for 2 months. I found out watching My dad for about twenty years. He lands more fish than anybody I have seen before. He just uses Plain hook with a tiny peace of lead. hollow core. thats it. Every once and a while if the river has a little bit of mud from run off. He will put maybe a little egg. Thats only in the early run. but I could see why people would use Indicators for dry fly fishing. I love Wet Flies. Keep your line tight. MOre Fish!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from badsmerf wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Wow, didn't know this is such a touchy subject. Feels like english snobbery to discriminate against indicators.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from elkomike wrote 1 year 27 weeks ago

Something else to think about when using an indicator.

I've lost a number of large fish recently when they broke tippets up to 3x flouro. Earlier this year I was hooking and landing large trout, and all of a sudden I couldn't do it.

What changed? I believe two things are causing my problems. First (physics thing) I switched from a 5-wt rig to a 7-wt rig. Not only is the rod stiffer but there is a greater moment of inertia on the 7-wt reel. AND I started using a Thingamabobber indicator, handy but they have a good deal of resistance when a rampaging trout drags them through the water. So, and I'm not sure of the main cause yet, all of these things stack up to create a good deal of force on the tippet when a large trout tries to shake the fly loose.

My belief is that some indicators may make it tougher to land the large trout it helps you to catch.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tacomanusmc wrote 1 year 27 weeks ago

Sounds like some of you think that just because I use an indicator I'm not as good of a fisherman as you. I've actually been told that while I was fishing Lake Taneycomo on my first fly fishing trip. And the snobbery that went along with that remark almost soured me on the sport. But I could care less. I'm 100% self taught, and I routinely catch more, and larger fish than the folks who tell me I'm doing it wrong by using an indicator. Sure, it's great watching a big fish rise to your perfectly drifted dry, but it's just as good seeing your indicator jerk to the side or disappear. If you want to make excuses about "loving the process and history," then by all means, keep flinging that dry fly and get skunked while I dredge the water with my indicator and catch fish until my arms are sore. That's my piece for the night.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs