Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Ever Carry a Piece, Flyfishing?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 19, 2009

Ever Carry a Piece, Flyfishing?

By Kirk Deeter

I'm wondering how many of you have ever carried a sidearm while flyfishing.

In roughly 25 years, I never have.  Never carried pepper spray, or anything else, for that matter.  And I have fished a lot, from Alaska with the bears, down to South America.  (Okay, on that Bolivia story, we had pistols, but we didn't actually wear them while fishing.)  Not that I have a problem with carrying sidearms.  I enjoy shooting them.

But have you ever, really, felt the need to carry when you fish? 

I remember a classic story:  It involves the Alaska guide who shows up with a .22 pistol.  The client says:  "A .22?  That won't stop a charging bear..." and the guide answers, "No it won't, but it will blow your kneecap off when it's time to run."  Okay, that's not funny...

This summer, I'm heading up to bear country on a self-guided fishing trip, and I'm thinking that a stainless-steel insurance policy might be in order.  Anyone have any advice for me in this regard?

Deeter

Comments (44)

Top Rated
All Comments
from FlyDave wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

In bear country, carry a .44 stainless, double-action, and hope you never have to touch it. The best bear defense, of course is a shotgun, and to reduce clumsiness while fishing, go short, ala a Winchester Defender, and alternate slugs with buckshot in the magazine. The operative here is defense.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Hell carry a .50, that will stop that bear right in his tracks.

As far as I go no, the only thing I have ever carried was a Ka-Bar fighting knife for the occasional run in with a tangle of 100 pound test mono from some anglers (Not calling anyone names) that has nearly caused me to go down while wearing waders. Plus it works well to keep those jerks from casting too close to me (There is a good story to this) which for them, if they snag me (Yes, I have had some jerks plant a few 4/0 hooks in me while they were snagging carp where I was fishing) there gear becomes mine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

My dad carries a .357 Mag in the sierras for mountain lion. That thing is a beast. I sometimes carry a 9mm. but only twice. They will do the trick when it comes to lion.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Yes i carry a Machete and a Ka-Bar fighting knife and two pocket knifes and a switchblade too. But i'm just a knife person. That's my thing.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm sry 'bout that didn't mean to put switchblade i don't touch those things!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

KD, as I have faced this same problem, I'll add my 2 cents.

1. Carrying a gun is almost a guarantee you won't see a bear, which is a good thing. It will, however, guarantee a sore shoulder. I know man, I lugged a shotgun around AK for a week and only saw a few chipmunks.

2. If you've got to carry, go shotgun with slugs. That's what was recommend by contacts prior to the trip and even by AK Fish & Wildlife on their website. If you think about it, you better be a damn good shot with a pistol regardless of caliber. You're not going to shoot a bear at 50 yards, so a rifle doesn't make much sense. Slugs are big, do a lot of damage, don't need particularly good aim and will stop a brute in very close range, which is the only range in which you'd need the gun, right?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Thanks Joe, and others.

Of course, the other classic story is the Alaska guide who tells his client to file down the sight on his 357 Magnum... not because it will help him aim any better, but because it will hurt less when the bear shoves it up his backside...

It's a serious concern, not to be light-handed when it matters. I am told, as you say, over and over, that the shotgun is the only real deal.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kolbster wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

i would have to go with a 500 magnum or a 460. but if you want somthing a little lighter a 454 is just fine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

It's a pain to carry, but it was the only thing that made sense.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Never fished in bear country, but I have fished in some downtown city areas that you would warrant some conceal carry. Around about when I was 12 my dad started packing his .357 in his creel after we heard about a older fisherman being mugged at knifepoint near a bridge trout loved to hang around.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishergirl wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I have always used a big game rifle as protection when guiding. A few years ago i got charged numerously by a bull moose (i kept trying to get away), and realized quickly that a large rifle was actually a pain not an asset. So, i got a .44 mag - which i don't actually carry yet as i don't have the right holster, but that is another story.

My point being, that since that day, all i have ever used and swear by is bear spray (new each season), with a back up spray that is easily reachable in my guide pack, and bear bangers. If the area is extra rich in bears, i will carry the 45-70 for a few days/weeks, but for the most part i am totally confident in bear spray.

I keep a bear spray with me at home all the time, and when traveling, its in the glove box. You never know... I had a large pit bull try to attack a friend's dog at a take out in California two years ago, and although i never had to use it, i sure felt safer knowing i could halt the dog. That is my two cents...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ramcatt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I fish in the hood for carp...

bear mase/spray is garbage... have you ever used it? tested it?
the spray is only like 15', and thats with no wind
i want something with a bit more stopping distance

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from stupid new fiel... wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Stephen Herrero's "Bear Attacks" is a very good look at why bears attack and how you can defend yourself. I recommend it highly. If I remember correctly, he suggests bear spray. He does discuss appropriate firearms for bear defense at some length though, saying don't bother carrying a rifle unless it is very large caliber.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishergirl wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Bear mace is not garbage, and yes, i have tested it and used it numerous times in the 15 years i have guided and the 7 years i have been carrying it. In fact, on that particular moose for one example.

Yes, it only goes a max of 30', that is why you don't let it go until the animal is within striking distance - generally about 12-15'. And yes, you must account for wind. There is a skill that goes into using bear spray properly, you cannot just pick it up and fire and expect it to make proper connection.

Often animals charge simply because humans are not paying proper attention to their surroundings and startle it/them, or they stumble upon a female/child, mating male/female, or an animal on a kill.

Killing an animal is not always the answer. In my situation, if i kill an animal it creates a much larger problem, as then many other carnivores will come to eat that animal - which makes a huge problem in relation to guiding and proper safety practices for my clients while on the river - not to mention its fairly hard to dispose of a 800 lb+ animal when you don't have access to any modern amenities.

Yes, guns kill and bear spray does not. But, just like anything else, guns are not a foolproof answer. Really, the item chosen is only able to operate as good as the person handling it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Evan V wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Am I a bad person for almost spraying my screen with pepsi because I laughed so hard at the .22 joke?
But cant't go wrong with a .475 wildy magnum. :)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think a lot of this argument has to do with experience. I know guides who work in serious grizz country and laugh off the idea of carrying a gun. But to them, encounters are almost a normal, everyday thing. They can read the animal and are confident with spray or nothing at all.

Coming to AK (on a self-exploratory trip) for a week from the east having never encountered a bear, I decided the shotgun would offer needed peace of mind, even though the last thing I would have ever wanted to do was use it. That's why we carried spray too. I know there are great books on grizz attacks/encounters, and I read up on it before heading out, but in truth, I think you could read all you want and it probably won't make a ton of difference in the split seconds it can take to get attacked.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm with vtbluegrass.... never worry about bears while wading the creeks and streams but I like to fish in downtown Nashville. Pull up in the projects, jump out and hit the stream! There are homeless camps under every bridge, some complete with grills, picnic tables, tents, coolers etc... Then there are the Asian and Latino teens who will go out ten at a time dragging nets and poaching everything they can pull out. Gets kind of hairy and I've had some close encounters but I'm big and mean looking and always have a Buck Zipper on my side and a .40 for back-up. Only real incident was when two homeless guys told me to give them my pole and I pulled out the Zipper and said "how bad you want it?"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I just met a guy last week who got chased by a juvenile brown bear while fly-fishing in AK this past summer. He didn't carry anything and felt himself very lucky to have gotten away. Apparently, the bear got within 10 feet or so before the guy jumped/fell into the river and was able swim a short distance into the current and be swept downstream and out of immediate danger.

Anyway, our discussion about carrying weapons basically resulted in the idea that you have to have it immediately accessible, be proficient, and be willing. Strangely, I'm not sure that everyone would meet all three conditions. I've never been to big-bear country, but I think I'd like a short-barreled tactical-type shotgun on a sling that I could keep out of the way but swing around easily enough. Just my uneducated thoughts.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chadlove wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Dr, Ralph we must fish in some of the same type places because my tacklebag gun is a Glock 19 and I'd just as soon leave my rods at home as I would that gun. Nothing like picking your way past abandoned meth labs as you're fishing the spring white bass run...

As for Alaska, why not a Marlin guide gun in 45-70? Short, light, handy, powerful. I know I'd rather pack that narrow-receiver Marlin on my back all day than say, an 870.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

During my 4 years living in AK I carried a mdl 629 S&W loaded with 240 gr hard cast SWC's the first year. Realizing the pistol had shortcomings I went to a mdl 600 Remington rifle in 350 Rem Magnum. Easy to carry with it's 18 in barrel and light weight and powerful enough for any bear. Did kill one grizzly and one black bear each with only 1 shot. That was while hunting. Never had to shoot while fishing. The pump shotgun with slugs is heavier but probably would work. I knew a fellow that shot a charging grizzley on Byer's creek with a Marlin 45-70 lever-action with good results. The spray was not around back then but it makes sense to have it whether you carry a gun or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from john c. wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Ultimately I don't know that having a gun with you is going to be an effective defense unless you can affix it to your person in a way that allows you to access in under a second.

I say this based on a story that one of my college professors relayed to me a few years ago. He had lost two of his relatives to a brown bear in the ANWR about fifteen years prior. There was an interesting article in National Geograpic at the time it occured.

To make a long story short. His relatives had lived in Alaska for thirty plus years and had kayaked and fished in ANWR for over twenty years. In addition, they took every precaution to avoid any such encounter. They stopped and ate dinner in one place before setting up camp in another so as to not put the smell of food into the air; they tied their food up in trees; they picked an open area; and they had a 45-70 lever action rifle in the tent between to the two of them. In fact, the conservation officers who investigated said there was virtually nothing else they could have done. But alas, it wasn't enough. The bear killed both of them before either one of them had a chance to get out of their sleeping bags and get the gun.

The article in NG is called ANWR Grizzly Attacks: They Did Everything Right, and it is by Johnathan Waterman.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from j-johnson17 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm a commissioned officer in Colorado, so I have a sidearm nearly everywhere I go. I try to take a gun with me whenever I'm in the field as well. In some instances, depending on the type of water and the amount of walking I'll be doing, I may put the gun in my vest rather than wear it, but it is always accessible if needed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from john c. wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I just realized that I made a typo in my initial post that makes the timeline impossible. I didn't attend to say that the incident occured fifteen years ago, but rather a couple of years ago.

I don't know what I was thinking.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Kaptur wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I live in Griz country and spend a lot of in the Bob Marshall, which is as thick with bear as anywhere in the lower 48.
The going theory out here is you want as many options as possible. First and foremost, everyone in the group should have bear spray. I also carry a gloc 10 whenever i'm in the backcountry. In addition to this, if we're packing in stock and floating I bring the 12 gauge in the boat, alternating slugs and buck shot as others have mentioned.

The only time I've ever fired in self defense was when I encountered a small griz on a kill. It seemed rather aggressive and started to approach me. When hooting and hollering didn't turn him around, I fired a shot into the air while it was still about 30 yards away. This was successful in scaring him off and I was able to cross the creek and get by on the other side.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I've fished dozens of times in grizzley country and never felt the need for a gun. I seldom fish these areas alone and know enough to make noise to ward off any surprise encounter but if I had to carry a weapon it would have to be at least a .44 mag double action revolver.

There is no need to pack in black bear country.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think Cermele is right - carry and you never see a thing. There's always the two legged critters out there, too, though. Just watch Deliverance again before heading for remote waters.

Titanium is nice, too.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jerry k wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Im gonna go with the shotgun cause you get better stopping power with OO buckshot and slugs than you would with a pistol,can hold more rounds than a pistol,and comes in marine grade coatings but the down side is its heavy but if your carrying it in a canoe it shouldnt be problem

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sportsman Matt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

This one is easy, go get a Remington 870 pump with the 20" Slug barrel with Iron Sights and a Pistol Grip. Your Choice of 12 or 20 Gauge, I would opt for the 12 Gauge 3" Magnum with Slugs, no buck shot as it spreads too much after 15 feet out of the barrel and just makes the bear mad. Don't do the "Scarface" hold where you shoot from the hip, Shoot it with a sling from the pistol grip and hold it up like you're going to shoot a real shotgun. If you can, get an Aimpoint for it, the dot puts it where you are shooting.

Yes it's heavier than a pistol, but 5+1 of 1 1/4 ounce slugs just under 3/4" in diameter will stop just about anything that moves.

Second Choice would be a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70, preferably in Stainelss Steel.

Handguns are nice, but when push comes to shove, I'll take a street howitzer anyday.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sportsman Matt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

This one is easy, go get a Remington 870 pump with the 20" Slug barrel with Iron Sights and a Pistol Grip. Your Choice of 12 or 20 Gauge, I would opt for the 12 Gauge 3" Magnum with Slugs, no buck shot as it spreads too much after 15 feet out of the barrel and just makes the bear mad. Don't do the "Scarface" hold where you shoot from the hip, Shoot it with a sling from the pistol grip and hold it up like you're going to shoot a real shotgun. If you can, get an Aimpoint for it, the dot puts it where you are shooting.

Yes it's heavier than a pistol, but 5+1 of 1 1/4 ounce slugs just under 3/4" in diameter will stop just about anything that moves.

Second Choice would be a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70, preferably in Stainelss Steel.

Handguns are nice, but when push comes to shove, I'll take a street howitzer anyday.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kvlazer22 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Why would you want to wound a hungry/angry bear? The S&W 500 will do the trick!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott in Ohio wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Dr Ralph and Chadlove,

I have run into the same problem. 15 years ago a colleague told me how he was mugged on a trout stream (not in a bad urban area either) Since them I have carried pepper spray. Never had to pull it but it's there. Scout motto - be prepared.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Doomtown wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think one of the biggest advantages firearms has over bear spray is illustrated by Mike Kaptur's story. Guns double up as bear bangers to scare suspicious bears before they attack. With bear bangers and bear spray, you would have to fumble around with two items if the bear you're trying to scare off with the bear bangers gets aggressive. Having been charged by a bear before, I understand the quickness of these attacks. I would not want to be fumbling with different items and/or taking my eyes off an agressive bear. I've never shot a bear before so I don't have an opinion about caliber. A revolver seems to make sense as it can stay with you no matter what you are doing. Get familiar with it and the holster. You don't want to have to figure out how to operate the safety if the moment of truth comes.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

if you ask the dow in alaska where i lived for 13 years, they will tell you to leave the firearm and use a good bear spray. the military grade. mace is crap! a bear is much faster than you think and you will most likely not get a shot off and if you do you will miss. you will miss that large object! if a bear can out run a horse, he will be able to get to you before you can get an effective shot off. carry the firearm if you want but make sure to season it first. metal tastes bad without some good seasonings.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

It seems that people are split on this as though they are voting for the president! I believe both are useful, both have plus/minus factors. I am a big believer in multi-task tools, and pepperspray is not one of them. it is also a one time use item, and hopefuly you only run into one bear, so then it is fine, but you can re-load a gun.a gun(large cal. sidearm or shotgun) can also be used as a signal device, and opened shells can be used to start a fire.As to the urban deterent, I have seen meth-heads take mace to the face and not blink. Whatever you use, practice using it!!! you can't read the directions on a canister of pepperspray when a big brownie is charging you at 30mph+!!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from KingFisher907 wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

As an Alaskan, when the question of packing a firearm while fishing arises, I tend to heed the adage of "its always better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it." Makes sense to me, especially where bears are concerned...

In my part of Alaska, bears arent the people-habituated, 'user-friendly' bears of the coastal streams farther south... Local bears tend to be Grizzlies of unpredictable and surly temperament...For this reason, I like to carry a short-barreled 12 gauge pump shotgun loaded with the biggest slugs it can handle...

Some people prefer bear spray and thats fine, for them...

Myself, when the chips are down, Ill be shooting to kill that s.o.b. ;)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Woodstock wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Deeter:

Whether you carry a firearm depends mostly upon how comfortable and capable you are with them. Can you pull off a killing or stopping shot in a high-pressure situation with an aggressive brown bear? Weigh those odds with the likelihood of seeing a bear, and use them to decide the firearm vs. pepper spray decision.

That said, if you choose a firearm, you will have to balance effectiveness against convenience. The overall best bear protection firearm? A high-power rifle in .338 caliber or greater. Short barrel for ease of handling. Stainless metal parts, with man-made stock to handle abuse. Second best: short-barreled .12 ga pump shotgun; 3" magnum slugs. Last and lowest I'd go: .44 mag, with heavy loads. I carry any of them (and yes, sometimes I only carry pepper spray), depending upon what I'm doing and the relative risk (number of aggressive bears) that I might likely encounter.

I've never killed a bear, but my father killed one with a .44 while fishing. Another friend also had to kill a bear, but he was packing a .375 rifle. And yet another friend killed a charging bear while hiking a stream doing biological work: he used his .44 but his partner also hit it with a .338.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from TP wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

First of all "Deeter" where are you going with out me to "AK"....Second the gun vs. spray debate is always a hot topic. I vote for the sidearm 44 mag, 305 Corbon Coppertops..Been charged twice in my years guiding there and it sure feels nice to pull out the meat wagon and have the ability to let a warning shot out if needed. The spray with all the wind swirling on the tundra would probably come back and bite me in the arse...No Thanks!! But one thing is for sure....ADFG will have your butt in a ringer if you just decide to go off an pop a bear if there is nary a scratch on you. Better have some wounds on your body or it's gonna be a long time in the pokey with the natives!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from TheEasternShore... wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

bear spray work and has been proven. look back to a field and stream issue there was a debate on whether to use a shotgun or bear spray. mace is probably the more ethical thing to do though

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from marceaton wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

If it is a stainless steel can of bear spray you are set. Bear spray works alot better than a firearm does. Give them a warning shot at 30 yards again at 20 then let them have the can at 10. Its not as cool as carrying a side arm but its better for you and the bear.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from acjcorbett wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Unless you're a damn good shot with your revolver, you might want to leave it at home and bring the Bear Spray. It's a lot more effective at the ranges you're likely to encounter bears at and it requires less accuracy under extremely stressful conditions. But if you absolutely positively have to bring a gun... my advice is a pump action shotgun loaded with 00 Remington Express Magnum Buckshot Shells. 12 pellets with a Velocity of 1290 ft/sec. Not great a long ranges... but I'll take 12 pieces of lead over 1 bullet from a handgun when you have a bear a 10 yrds. Or stick to bear spray... a lot less paper work!!! Tight lines

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from acjcorbett wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Oh and if you do opt for bear spray remember to bring TWO cans... If you do have deploy a can and spray a bear, what are you going to do when the can is empty, you're on the retreat, stressed and jumpy? Best to have that second can just incase... no point in running into a second bear with nothing but a fly rod and an empty can of pepper spray to defend yourself!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

My choice is a .44 mag (hot .45 as good or better) with good 265-300 gr. handloads in single or double action revolver whichever you are used to handling and can instantly hit your target with. Bigger pistol is slow on repeat shots which will be more than likely necessary for one reason or another. I always carry a pepper sprayer but in my heart I feel I will reach for the revolver if in any way I believe the charge is more than a bluff. My son and I had 27 bear encounters while flyfishing between May and September of 2003. Five bears in one day and at least one of them saw us first. The truth is we never had a problem because we walked away from the bear(s) and never threatened it or them. It is difficult to concentrate on flyfishing plus the water makes so much noise that it is a distinct possibility to find yourself uncomfortably close to a bear(s). Forget the shotgun as most fisherman seem to get tired of hauling it around with them, lean it against a boulder, and guess who is watching? Ole Mr. Griz is on the other side of the boulder. A revolver and a sprayer might not be the best insurance but it sure is better than a 9 foot Sage rod with a #6 line attached to even a #8 wooly booger for defence purposes.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitefish wrote 3 years 14 weeks ago

tuff question for sure

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitefish wrote 3 years 14 weeks ago

tuff question for sure

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from FlyDave wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

In bear country, carry a .44 stainless, double-action, and hope you never have to touch it. The best bear defense, of course is a shotgun, and to reduce clumsiness while fishing, go short, ala a Winchester Defender, and alternate slugs with buckshot in the magazine. The operative here is defense.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

KD, as I have faced this same problem, I'll add my 2 cents.

1. Carrying a gun is almost a guarantee you won't see a bear, which is a good thing. It will, however, guarantee a sore shoulder. I know man, I lugged a shotgun around AK for a week and only saw a few chipmunks.

2. If you've got to carry, go shotgun with slugs. That's what was recommend by contacts prior to the trip and even by AK Fish & Wildlife on their website. If you think about it, you better be a damn good shot with a pistol regardless of caliber. You're not going to shoot a bear at 50 yards, so a rifle doesn't make much sense. Slugs are big, do a lot of damage, don't need particularly good aim and will stop a brute in very close range, which is the only range in which you'd need the gun, right?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ramcatt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I fish in the hood for carp...

bear mase/spray is garbage... have you ever used it? tested it?
the spray is only like 15', and thats with no wind
i want something with a bit more stopping distance

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Evan V wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Am I a bad person for almost spraying my screen with pepsi because I laughed so hard at the .22 joke?
But cant't go wrong with a .475 wildy magnum. :)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

It seems that people are split on this as though they are voting for the president! I believe both are useful, both have plus/minus factors. I am a big believer in multi-task tools, and pepperspray is not one of them. it is also a one time use item, and hopefuly you only run into one bear, so then it is fine, but you can re-load a gun.a gun(large cal. sidearm or shotgun) can also be used as a signal device, and opened shells can be used to start a fire.As to the urban deterent, I have seen meth-heads take mace to the face and not blink. Whatever you use, practice using it!!! you can't read the directions on a canister of pepperspray when a big brownie is charging you at 30mph+!!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from KingFisher907 wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

As an Alaskan, when the question of packing a firearm while fishing arises, I tend to heed the adage of "its always better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it." Makes sense to me, especially where bears are concerned...

In my part of Alaska, bears arent the people-habituated, 'user-friendly' bears of the coastal streams farther south... Local bears tend to be Grizzlies of unpredictable and surly temperament...For this reason, I like to carry a short-barreled 12 gauge pump shotgun loaded with the biggest slugs it can handle...

Some people prefer bear spray and thats fine, for them...

Myself, when the chips are down, Ill be shooting to kill that s.o.b. ;)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Hell carry a .50, that will stop that bear right in his tracks.

As far as I go no, the only thing I have ever carried was a Ka-Bar fighting knife for the occasional run in with a tangle of 100 pound test mono from some anglers (Not calling anyone names) that has nearly caused me to go down while wearing waders. Plus it works well to keep those jerks from casting too close to me (There is a good story to this) which for them, if they snag me (Yes, I have had some jerks plant a few 4/0 hooks in me while they were snagging carp where I was fishing) there gear becomes mine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

My dad carries a .357 Mag in the sierras for mountain lion. That thing is a beast. I sometimes carry a 9mm. but only twice. They will do the trick when it comes to lion.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kirkdeeter wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Thanks Joe, and others.

Of course, the other classic story is the Alaska guide who tells his client to file down the sight on his 357 Magnum... not because it will help him aim any better, but because it will hurt less when the bear shoves it up his backside...

It's a serious concern, not to be light-handed when it matters. I am told, as you say, over and over, that the shotgun is the only real deal.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kolbster wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

i would have to go with a 500 magnum or a 460. but if you want somthing a little lighter a 454 is just fine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

It's a pain to carry, but it was the only thing that made sense.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishergirl wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I have always used a big game rifle as protection when guiding. A few years ago i got charged numerously by a bull moose (i kept trying to get away), and realized quickly that a large rifle was actually a pain not an asset. So, i got a .44 mag - which i don't actually carry yet as i don't have the right holster, but that is another story.

My point being, that since that day, all i have ever used and swear by is bear spray (new each season), with a back up spray that is easily reachable in my guide pack, and bear bangers. If the area is extra rich in bears, i will carry the 45-70 for a few days/weeks, but for the most part i am totally confident in bear spray.

I keep a bear spray with me at home all the time, and when traveling, its in the glove box. You never know... I had a large pit bull try to attack a friend's dog at a take out in California two years ago, and although i never had to use it, i sure felt safer knowing i could halt the dog. That is my two cents...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm with vtbluegrass.... never worry about bears while wading the creeks and streams but I like to fish in downtown Nashville. Pull up in the projects, jump out and hit the stream! There are homeless camps under every bridge, some complete with grills, picnic tables, tents, coolers etc... Then there are the Asian and Latino teens who will go out ten at a time dragging nets and poaching everything they can pull out. Gets kind of hairy and I've had some close encounters but I'm big and mean looking and always have a Buck Zipper on my side and a .40 for back-up. Only real incident was when two homeless guys told me to give them my pole and I pulled out the Zipper and said "how bad you want it?"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kvlazer22 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Why would you want to wound a hungry/angry bear? The S&W 500 will do the trick!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Woodstock wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Deeter:

Whether you carry a firearm depends mostly upon how comfortable and capable you are with them. Can you pull off a killing or stopping shot in a high-pressure situation with an aggressive brown bear? Weigh those odds with the likelihood of seeing a bear, and use them to decide the firearm vs. pepper spray decision.

That said, if you choose a firearm, you will have to balance effectiveness against convenience. The overall best bear protection firearm? A high-power rifle in .338 caliber or greater. Short barrel for ease of handling. Stainless metal parts, with man-made stock to handle abuse. Second best: short-barreled .12 ga pump shotgun; 3" magnum slugs. Last and lowest I'd go: .44 mag, with heavy loads. I carry any of them (and yes, sometimes I only carry pepper spray), depending upon what I'm doing and the relative risk (number of aggressive bears) that I might likely encounter.

I've never killed a bear, but my father killed one with a .44 while fishing. Another friend also had to kill a bear, but he was packing a .375 rifle. And yet another friend killed a charging bear while hiking a stream doing biological work: he used his .44 but his partner also hit it with a .338.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from acjcorbett wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Unless you're a damn good shot with your revolver, you might want to leave it at home and bring the Bear Spray. It's a lot more effective at the ranges you're likely to encounter bears at and it requires less accuracy under extremely stressful conditions. But if you absolutely positively have to bring a gun... my advice is a pump action shotgun loaded with 00 Remington Express Magnum Buckshot Shells. 12 pellets with a Velocity of 1290 ft/sec. Not great a long ranges... but I'll take 12 pieces of lead over 1 bullet from a handgun when you have a bear a 10 yrds. Or stick to bear spray... a lot less paper work!!! Tight lines

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from acjcorbett wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

Oh and if you do opt for bear spray remember to bring TWO cans... If you do have deploy a can and spray a bear, what are you going to do when the can is empty, you're on the retreat, stressed and jumpy? Best to have that second can just incase... no point in running into a second bear with nothing but a fly rod and an empty can of pepper spray to defend yourself!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Yes i carry a Machete and a Ka-Bar fighting knife and two pocket knifes and a switchblade too. But i'm just a knife person. That's my thing.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mc. Squizzy wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm sry 'bout that didn't mean to put switchblade i don't touch those things!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Never fished in bear country, but I have fished in some downtown city areas that you would warrant some conceal carry. Around about when I was 12 my dad started packing his .357 in his creel after we heard about a older fisherman being mugged at knifepoint near a bridge trout loved to hang around.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from stupid new fiel... wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Stephen Herrero's "Bear Attacks" is a very good look at why bears attack and how you can defend yourself. I recommend it highly. If I remember correctly, he suggests bear spray. He does discuss appropriate firearms for bear defense at some length though, saying don't bother carrying a rifle unless it is very large caliber.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from flyfishergirl wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Bear mace is not garbage, and yes, i have tested it and used it numerous times in the 15 years i have guided and the 7 years i have been carrying it. In fact, on that particular moose for one example.

Yes, it only goes a max of 30', that is why you don't let it go until the animal is within striking distance - generally about 12-15'. And yes, you must account for wind. There is a skill that goes into using bear spray properly, you cannot just pick it up and fire and expect it to make proper connection.

Often animals charge simply because humans are not paying proper attention to their surroundings and startle it/them, or they stumble upon a female/child, mating male/female, or an animal on a kill.

Killing an animal is not always the answer. In my situation, if i kill an animal it creates a much larger problem, as then many other carnivores will come to eat that animal - which makes a huge problem in relation to guiding and proper safety practices for my clients while on the river - not to mention its fairly hard to dispose of a 800 lb+ animal when you don't have access to any modern amenities.

Yes, guns kill and bear spray does not. But, just like anything else, guns are not a foolproof answer. Really, the item chosen is only able to operate as good as the person handling it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joe_Cermele wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think a lot of this argument has to do with experience. I know guides who work in serious grizz country and laugh off the idea of carrying a gun. But to them, encounters are almost a normal, everyday thing. They can read the animal and are confident with spray or nothing at all.

Coming to AK (on a self-exploratory trip) for a week from the east having never encountered a bear, I decided the shotgun would offer needed peace of mind, even though the last thing I would have ever wanted to do was use it. That's why we carried spray too. I know there are great books on grizz attacks/encounters, and I read up on it before heading out, but in truth, I think you could read all you want and it probably won't make a ton of difference in the split seconds it can take to get attacked.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I just met a guy last week who got chased by a juvenile brown bear while fly-fishing in AK this past summer. He didn't carry anything and felt himself very lucky to have gotten away. Apparently, the bear got within 10 feet or so before the guy jumped/fell into the river and was able swim a short distance into the current and be swept downstream and out of immediate danger.

Anyway, our discussion about carrying weapons basically resulted in the idea that you have to have it immediately accessible, be proficient, and be willing. Strangely, I'm not sure that everyone would meet all three conditions. I've never been to big-bear country, but I think I'd like a short-barreled tactical-type shotgun on a sling that I could keep out of the way but swing around easily enough. Just my uneducated thoughts.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chadlove wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Dr, Ralph we must fish in some of the same type places because my tacklebag gun is a Glock 19 and I'd just as soon leave my rods at home as I would that gun. Nothing like picking your way past abandoned meth labs as you're fishing the spring white bass run...

As for Alaska, why not a Marlin guide gun in 45-70? Short, light, handy, powerful. I know I'd rather pack that narrow-receiver Marlin on my back all day than say, an 870.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

During my 4 years living in AK I carried a mdl 629 S&W loaded with 240 gr hard cast SWC's the first year. Realizing the pistol had shortcomings I went to a mdl 600 Remington rifle in 350 Rem Magnum. Easy to carry with it's 18 in barrel and light weight and powerful enough for any bear. Did kill one grizzly and one black bear each with only 1 shot. That was while hunting. Never had to shoot while fishing. The pump shotgun with slugs is heavier but probably would work. I knew a fellow that shot a charging grizzley on Byer's creek with a Marlin 45-70 lever-action with good results. The spray was not around back then but it makes sense to have it whether you carry a gun or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from john c. wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Ultimately I don't know that having a gun with you is going to be an effective defense unless you can affix it to your person in a way that allows you to access in under a second.

I say this based on a story that one of my college professors relayed to me a few years ago. He had lost two of his relatives to a brown bear in the ANWR about fifteen years prior. There was an interesting article in National Geograpic at the time it occured.

To make a long story short. His relatives had lived in Alaska for thirty plus years and had kayaked and fished in ANWR for over twenty years. In addition, they took every precaution to avoid any such encounter. They stopped and ate dinner in one place before setting up camp in another so as to not put the smell of food into the air; they tied their food up in trees; they picked an open area; and they had a 45-70 lever action rifle in the tent between to the two of them. In fact, the conservation officers who investigated said there was virtually nothing else they could have done. But alas, it wasn't enough. The bear killed both of them before either one of them had a chance to get out of their sleeping bags and get the gun.

The article in NG is called ANWR Grizzly Attacks: They Did Everything Right, and it is by Johnathan Waterman.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from j-johnson17 wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I'm a commissioned officer in Colorado, so I have a sidearm nearly everywhere I go. I try to take a gun with me whenever I'm in the field as well. In some instances, depending on the type of water and the amount of walking I'll be doing, I may put the gun in my vest rather than wear it, but it is always accessible if needed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from john c. wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I just realized that I made a typo in my initial post that makes the timeline impossible. I didn't attend to say that the incident occured fifteen years ago, but rather a couple of years ago.

I don't know what I was thinking.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Kaptur wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I live in Griz country and spend a lot of in the Bob Marshall, which is as thick with bear as anywhere in the lower 48.
The going theory out here is you want as many options as possible. First and foremost, everyone in the group should have bear spray. I also carry a gloc 10 whenever i'm in the backcountry. In addition to this, if we're packing in stock and floating I bring the 12 gauge in the boat, alternating slugs and buck shot as others have mentioned.

The only time I've ever fired in self defense was when I encountered a small griz on a kill. It seemed rather aggressive and started to approach me. When hooting and hollering didn't turn him around, I fired a shot into the air while it was still about 30 yards away. This was successful in scaring him off and I was able to cross the creek and get by on the other side.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I've fished dozens of times in grizzley country and never felt the need for a gun. I seldom fish these areas alone and know enough to make noise to ward off any surprise encounter but if I had to carry a weapon it would have to be at least a .44 mag double action revolver.

There is no need to pack in black bear country.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think Cermele is right - carry and you never see a thing. There's always the two legged critters out there, too, though. Just watch Deliverance again before heading for remote waters.

Titanium is nice, too.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jerry k wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Im gonna go with the shotgun cause you get better stopping power with OO buckshot and slugs than you would with a pistol,can hold more rounds than a pistol,and comes in marine grade coatings but the down side is its heavy but if your carrying it in a canoe it shouldnt be problem

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sportsman Matt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

This one is easy, go get a Remington 870 pump with the 20" Slug barrel with Iron Sights and a Pistol Grip. Your Choice of 12 or 20 Gauge, I would opt for the 12 Gauge 3" Magnum with Slugs, no buck shot as it spreads too much after 15 feet out of the barrel and just makes the bear mad. Don't do the "Scarface" hold where you shoot from the hip, Shoot it with a sling from the pistol grip and hold it up like you're going to shoot a real shotgun. If you can, get an Aimpoint for it, the dot puts it where you are shooting.

Yes it's heavier than a pistol, but 5+1 of 1 1/4 ounce slugs just under 3/4" in diameter will stop just about anything that moves.

Second Choice would be a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70, preferably in Stainelss Steel.

Handguns are nice, but when push comes to shove, I'll take a street howitzer anyday.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sportsman Matt wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

This one is easy, go get a Remington 870 pump with the 20" Slug barrel with Iron Sights and a Pistol Grip. Your Choice of 12 or 20 Gauge, I would opt for the 12 Gauge 3" Magnum with Slugs, no buck shot as it spreads too much after 15 feet out of the barrel and just makes the bear mad. Don't do the "Scarface" hold where you shoot from the hip, Shoot it with a sling from the pistol grip and hold it up like you're going to shoot a real shotgun. If you can, get an Aimpoint for it, the dot puts it where you are shooting.

Yes it's heavier than a pistol, but 5+1 of 1 1/4 ounce slugs just under 3/4" in diameter will stop just about anything that moves.

Second Choice would be a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70, preferably in Stainelss Steel.

Handguns are nice, but when push comes to shove, I'll take a street howitzer anyday.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott in Ohio wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

Dr Ralph and Chadlove,

I have run into the same problem. 15 years ago a colleague told me how he was mugged on a trout stream (not in a bad urban area either) Since them I have carried pepper spray. Never had to pull it but it's there. Scout motto - be prepared.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Doomtown wrote 3 years 18 weeks ago

I think one of the biggest advantages firearms has over bear spray is illustrated by Mike Kaptur's story. Guns double up as bear bangers to scare suspicious bears before they attack. With bear bangers and bear spray, you would have to fumble around with two items if the bear you're trying to scare off with the bear bangers gets aggressive. Having been charged by a bear before, I understand the quickness of these attacks. I would not want to be fumbling with different items and/or taking my eyes off an agressive bear. I've never shot a bear before so I don't have an opinion about caliber. A revolver seems to make sense as it can stay with you no matter what you are doing. Get familiar with it and the holster. You don't want to have to figure out how to operate the safety if the moment of truth comes.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from TP wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

First of all "Deeter" where are you going with out me to "AK"....Second the gun vs. spray debate is always a hot topic. I vote for the sidearm 44 mag, 305 Corbon Coppertops..Been charged twice in my years guiding there and it sure feels nice to pull out the meat wagon and have the ability to let a warning shot out if needed. The spray with all the wind swirling on the tundra would probably come back and bite me in the arse...No Thanks!! But one thing is for sure....ADFG will have your butt in a ringer if you just decide to go off an pop a bear if there is nary a scratch on you. Better have some wounds on your body or it's gonna be a long time in the pokey with the natives!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

My choice is a .44 mag (hot .45 as good or better) with good 265-300 gr. handloads in single or double action revolver whichever you are used to handling and can instantly hit your target with. Bigger pistol is slow on repeat shots which will be more than likely necessary for one reason or another. I always carry a pepper sprayer but in my heart I feel I will reach for the revolver if in any way I believe the charge is more than a bluff. My son and I had 27 bear encounters while flyfishing between May and September of 2003. Five bears in one day and at least one of them saw us first. The truth is we never had a problem because we walked away from the bear(s) and never threatened it or them. It is difficult to concentrate on flyfishing plus the water makes so much noise that it is a distinct possibility to find yourself uncomfortably close to a bear(s). Forget the shotgun as most fisherman seem to get tired of hauling it around with them, lean it against a boulder, and guess who is watching? Ole Mr. Griz is on the other side of the boulder. A revolver and a sprayer might not be the best insurance but it sure is better than a 9 foot Sage rod with a #6 line attached to even a #8 wooly booger for defence purposes.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitefish wrote 3 years 14 weeks ago

tuff question for sure

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitefish wrote 3 years 14 weeks ago

tuff question for sure

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago

if you ask the dow in alaska where i lived for 13 years, they will tell you to leave the firearm and use a good bear spray. the military grade. mace is crap! a bear is much faster than you think and you will most likely not get a shot off and if you do you will miss. you will miss that large object! if a bear can out run a horse, he will be able to get to you before you can get an effective shot off. carry the firearm if you want but make sure to season it first. metal tastes bad without some good seasonings.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from TheEasternShore... wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

bear spray work and has been proven. look back to a field and stream issue there was a debate on whether to use a shotgun or bear spray. mace is probably the more ethical thing to do though

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from marceaton wrote 3 years 16 weeks ago

If it is a stainless steel can of bear spray you are set. Bear spray works alot better than a firearm does. Give them a warning shot at 30 yards again at 20 then let them have the can at 10. Its not as cool as carrying a side arm but its better for you and the bear.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs