Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Sage Introduces New Fly Rods Designed for Increased Accuracy

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

June 24, 2011

Sage Introduces New Fly Rods Designed for Increased Accuracy

by Kirk Deeter

Yesterday, Sage announced the launch of a new rod series called "ONE." I have yet to see it or cast it, but based on what I've read, the "hook" for the ONE series is accuracy. And they're basing that claim on something they call "Konnetic" technology, which has to do with resin-to-carbon ratios, and the way they align the carbon fibers in the rod during manufacturing.

From Sage: "The ONE offers exceptional tracking with virtually no lateral or torsional movement, resulting in astonishing casting accuracy that is unparalleled in the marketplace. The inherent strength of Konnetic technology allows ONE rods to have a smaller diameter and are 25% lighter than comparable Sage rods. These attributes combine to provide augmented aerodynamic efficiency. Further innovations are the 70% lighter, low profile ferrules that help direct and carry energy through the rod without sacrificing strength, critical action and feel.

“The ONE rod becomes a true extension of the angler’s arm,” notes Sage Chief Rod Designer, Jerry Siem. “It offers a more fluid transmission of energy from the arm to the fly. The eye sees the cast it wants to make and is translated to the hand through the rod instantaneously.”

Siem, by the way, is one of the best in this business, and when he talks about feel, I am pretty comfortable in assuming he's going to have that factor dialed in. I will tell you all exactly what I think about ONE as soon as I can test cast it. Available in 3 through 10 weights, the ONE rods will retail between $715 and $740.

The arrival of ONE will fill a void left by Sage's popular Z-Axis series, which the company will discontinue. Are you sad to see Z-Axis go? If so, you might start checking the Internet for blowout deals from retailers trying to clear inventory. The "out with the (not so) old, in with the new" phenomenon is the way of the fly world these days, and will continue to be so, as long as consumers stay hungry for the "swifter, higher, stronger" sales pitch... and so long as companies like Sage can deliver.

I will say thank you to Sage for making accuracy the value platform for this series, and not touting a rod that will add more "distance" and "wind-busting" power for a market that's already over-concerned with casting distance and, in my opinion, is pretty proficient at busting wind.

Comments (16)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Sayfu wrote 48 weeks 2 hours ago

The biggest factor in accuracy, and good graphite rod makers have made rods with very little lateral movement for sometime now is the ability of the angler to cast accurately, and form tight loops, something that has been poo-pood by a notable lately. I can sit anchored in my boat with a number of big sized trout working small bugs, like BWO's along a seam not 15 ft. away, and the client doesn't know where his fly landed, and has little chance of hooking up. Why? Where he aimed the cast, he threw an open loop, and the leader, end of the fly line was blown way off course. They now can't see the fly because they don't know where it is. Throw a tight loop, and even though you can't see your small fly, you know basically where it landed, and any surface disturbance in that area you lift the rod..fish on. And a roll cast won't get the job done. One false cast, and lay it in there.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MATroutslayer wrote 48 weeks 2 hours ago

What's the price tag on these rods?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from badsmerf wrote 48 weeks 1 hour ago

Sounds like a marketing thing to me. I'm sure the rods have a different color and some different materials, but any sage better be accurate for the price you pay for it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 48 weeks 55 min ago

tis marketing, and a real stretch. Years back when glass was the material of choice you'd pick through a number of blanks before you found a straight one..the tips would curve off on many of them.(making your own rod) With graphite, most are straight, and the occasional on with an off angled tip is set to the side. Sage has undoubtedly included some new high tech features that aids to accurate casting, but I would guess they are also telling you the rod is a medium action, or a soft action rod as well. For short, accurate casting, the rod has to flex using an easy deployed stroke, no high speed, hauling, false casting to get the rod to flex. When Deeter mentioned the centennial glass rod that was being re-introduced, I thought of this very thing...short distance, accurate casting..and this is where that short, light, easy to load glass rod would really excel..set the hook, glass rod bends cushioning a lt. tippet..not much better, and a far less expensive price.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

I would pay more for it if they had better marketing hype for a yet another stick that won't compensate for crappy casting skills.
It's called practice, kids. $700 for a stick of graphite ain't going to compensate for lack of skill.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Rob..One of those casting principles that we included in our flyfishing manual that we drew up many years ago now, and I probably got it from the FFF guys, was.."the line goes where the rod tip goes, and the rod tip goes where your hand, and arm direct it to go." And that is the essence. Have a rod that will flex in the short distance range, and a straight tip that isn't angled off creating inaccurate casts, and you are on your way to accurate casting when you've developed good casting skills.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

What is your casting manual? I'd be curious to take a look at it.
I was fortunate enough to learn from two local casting masters, and have spent countless hours on the lawn and on the river casting, casting, casting. Read some of Russel Chatham's stuff and he says that it probably takes 10 years of lots of work to become a truly proficient caster, and I believe him.
I understand that where the arm goes so goeth the line, most rods being too stiff today to flex and load at short range. And a bent tip is not going to help with that, but how much more accuracy does a $700 rod get you than say a $400 St. Croix? And how many rods do you see these days with bent tips?
Most guys would be better off buying a rod that loads in the medium range, than the pool cues that are currently flooding the market.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Rob, I don't think a more expensive rod can. And what I am saying is that some blanks don't come out straight, the tips are curved, and need to be discarded. There are far less crooked blanks made of graphite than there use to be made of glass. The tip is the key. When you make the casting stroke you move the tip in a straight line plane, and the narrow angled wrist flex that occurs at the end of the stroke creates the size of the loop. There is also a technical factor involved in todays new rods where flex is a separate aspect from rod action (fast, med. fast, med. and slow) via the use of different graphite materials used in one blank they are able to create a flexy rod that is also a fast action rod. In the past, I could pick up a rod and flex it, and know what action it was, but not today. And it is a lot about the tip section. A very thin tip has less wt/mass, and can recover faster than a slightly bigger diameter tip. You need to commit much of casting to motor memory, and that involves lots of casting. The timing of the cast..the backcast is different according to how much line you have out. Casters that learn to haul create a rhythm of casting, and then after they make the power stop at the end of the cast, they don't just stop, and have to guess when a fair amount of line is cast, and determine when it will straighten out in the back. They drift their hand, and forearm back as the line goes back after they make the stop, and create the loop. This greatly improves the timing necessary as to when to go forward, and provides more length to the forecast allowing it to be smoother. Mu manual was only used in our clases, designed for our 3 day classes, and we updated it every so often. i changed the cover on it numerous times as I taught classes for different retail outlets, and Park and Rec Depts. I like to cast different rods with different flexes, and actions from time to time when I'm on the water. Perks my interest in using the right stroke, and timing with a particular rod. And of the more inexpensive rods now on the market. Many use to have too much glass in them, and were way too flexy/sloppy. Today, you can choose a good casting, inexpensive rod that works well in most situations, and you are right, a medium action that a caster can feel load up is a good choice to learn, and fish with. I prefer them to be slightly faster, a med. fast action, but either one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Sayfu summed it up. The line goes where the tip goes.

I'm wondering if the rod has some sort of a super spine. Probably will not do me any good. I have a bad habit of casting with the rod torqued sideways in my hand. Taking the spine out of the equation.

Bass rod manufacturers have already come out with the smaller guides designed for accuracy but I like the idea of a smaller diameter blank.

I also like the idea that accuracy is more important than distance. Because it is.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

You can cast through a whole range of degrees from side arm to across your body, and the principles apply, but the most accurate cast is straight up over your casting eye like shooting a gun. They have those disciplines where you cast into the circles located at different distances, and the cast of choice is straight up over your casting eye. I tend to cast 3/4 when given a choice. My elbow flares out, not kept in..just like I would throw a ball.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

buckhunter..Don't quite know what you mean by "torqued sideways," but, I think Lefty casts that way advocating turning the reel towards you rather than casting with the reel pointed down. The guides then are in better alignment with the line held in the line hand. If you haul, the pull, and then allow the line to go back through the guides as your line hand follows up close to the reel ending somewhat near the reel at the end of the backcast is in line.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Here is another aspect of these expensive rods you might think about. You just mortgaged the farm, and put down $740 big ones, and several years later they discontinue the rod, and now they advertise you can pick one up at blowout prices!!!! How good does that make you feel? doesn't say much for your investment.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 47 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu, when I cast the reel is pointed away from me. Not sure but I have always figured it was poor use of the spine. Why put the guides along the spine if I'm just going to use the rod sideways?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 4 days ago

Buckhunter..Got me on that one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Todd Tanner wrote 46 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu,

You wrote, "I can sit anchored in my boat with a number of big sized trout working small bugs, like BWO's along a seam not 15 ft. away, and the client doesn't know where his fly landed, and has little chance of hooking up. Why? Where he aimed the cast, he threw an open loop, and the leader, end of the fly line was blown way off course. They now can't see the fly because they don't know where it is. Throw a tight loop, and even though you can't see your small fly, you know basically where it landed ..."

Trying to get clients to throw tight loops, especially in the wind, is usually a waste of time. Assuming they're casting across the current, have them aim their cast a little further upstream and past the fishing's feeding lane by three or four feet. Once the line is on the water, have them lift the rod tip and skate the fly back into the lane. Most of them will be able to pick up the skating fly - it's much easier to see - and then they just drop their tip when the fly is in the lane and allow the fly to dead drift down to the trout. You might want to use a cripple with a deer hair or cdc post, as a more buoyant fly will hold up to the skate without getting too wet to float.

Proficient anglers rarely need to use this particular technique, but it's great for clients, especially when the bugs are small or during a heavy hatch.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 46 weeks 4 days ago

Good suggestion. I brought up this advanced angling situation that often took place in the Fall when BWO's were the only thing going. It is exciting fishing to visible fish, and you can get close to your targets. The fly is small, and if you don't lay it on the water properly it gets pulled under, and won't pop back up. Drag is not your friend, and a dragging fly is seldom taken. Multiple casts often work best, and someone with good line control can cast quickly again, and again getting hookups. Watching big trout suspend, and move around, moving forward, back, side to side, and trying to time your cast, and get a hookup is extremely exciting fly fishing. And frustrating for a guide! Often the client gets excited and casts too far lining the trout, and it puts them down. You have to sit and wait for fish to begin feeding again, and they do not want to wait!.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Sayfu wrote 48 weeks 55 min ago

tis marketing, and a real stretch. Years back when glass was the material of choice you'd pick through a number of blanks before you found a straight one..the tips would curve off on many of them.(making your own rod) With graphite, most are straight, and the occasional on with an off angled tip is set to the side. Sage has undoubtedly included some new high tech features that aids to accurate casting, but I would guess they are also telling you the rod is a medium action, or a soft action rod as well. For short, accurate casting, the rod has to flex using an easy deployed stroke, no high speed, hauling, false casting to get the rod to flex. When Deeter mentioned the centennial glass rod that was being re-introduced, I thought of this very thing...short distance, accurate casting..and this is where that short, light, easy to load glass rod would really excel..set the hook, glass rod bends cushioning a lt. tippet..not much better, and a far less expensive price.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Todd Tanner wrote 46 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu,

You wrote, "I can sit anchored in my boat with a number of big sized trout working small bugs, like BWO's along a seam not 15 ft. away, and the client doesn't know where his fly landed, and has little chance of hooking up. Why? Where he aimed the cast, he threw an open loop, and the leader, end of the fly line was blown way off course. They now can't see the fly because they don't know where it is. Throw a tight loop, and even though you can't see your small fly, you know basically where it landed ..."

Trying to get clients to throw tight loops, especially in the wind, is usually a waste of time. Assuming they're casting across the current, have them aim their cast a little further upstream and past the fishing's feeding lane by three or four feet. Once the line is on the water, have them lift the rod tip and skate the fly back into the lane. Most of them will be able to pick up the skating fly - it's much easier to see - and then they just drop their tip when the fly is in the lane and allow the fly to dead drift down to the trout. You might want to use a cripple with a deer hair or cdc post, as a more buoyant fly will hold up to the skate without getting too wet to float.

Proficient anglers rarely need to use this particular technique, but it's great for clients, especially when the bugs are small or during a heavy hatch.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 48 weeks 2 hours ago

The biggest factor in accuracy, and good graphite rod makers have made rods with very little lateral movement for sometime now is the ability of the angler to cast accurately, and form tight loops, something that has been poo-pood by a notable lately. I can sit anchored in my boat with a number of big sized trout working small bugs, like BWO's along a seam not 15 ft. away, and the client doesn't know where his fly landed, and has little chance of hooking up. Why? Where he aimed the cast, he threw an open loop, and the leader, end of the fly line was blown way off course. They now can't see the fly because they don't know where it is. Throw a tight loop, and even though you can't see your small fly, you know basically where it landed, and any surface disturbance in that area you lift the rod..fish on. And a roll cast won't get the job done. One false cast, and lay it in there.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MATroutslayer wrote 48 weeks 2 hours ago

What's the price tag on these rods?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from badsmerf wrote 48 weeks 1 hour ago

Sounds like a marketing thing to me. I'm sure the rods have a different color and some different materials, but any sage better be accurate for the price you pay for it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

I would pay more for it if they had better marketing hype for a yet another stick that won't compensate for crappy casting skills.
It's called practice, kids. $700 for a stick of graphite ain't going to compensate for lack of skill.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Rob..One of those casting principles that we included in our flyfishing manual that we drew up many years ago now, and I probably got it from the FFF guys, was.."the line goes where the rod tip goes, and the rod tip goes where your hand, and arm direct it to go." And that is the essence. Have a rod that will flex in the short distance range, and a straight tip that isn't angled off creating inaccurate casts, and you are on your way to accurate casting when you've developed good casting skills.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

What is your casting manual? I'd be curious to take a look at it.
I was fortunate enough to learn from two local casting masters, and have spent countless hours on the lawn and on the river casting, casting, casting. Read some of Russel Chatham's stuff and he says that it probably takes 10 years of lots of work to become a truly proficient caster, and I believe him.
I understand that where the arm goes so goeth the line, most rods being too stiff today to flex and load at short range. And a bent tip is not going to help with that, but how much more accuracy does a $700 rod get you than say a $400 St. Croix? And how many rods do you see these days with bent tips?
Most guys would be better off buying a rod that loads in the medium range, than the pool cues that are currently flooding the market.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Rob, I don't think a more expensive rod can. And what I am saying is that some blanks don't come out straight, the tips are curved, and need to be discarded. There are far less crooked blanks made of graphite than there use to be made of glass. The tip is the key. When you make the casting stroke you move the tip in a straight line plane, and the narrow angled wrist flex that occurs at the end of the stroke creates the size of the loop. There is also a technical factor involved in todays new rods where flex is a separate aspect from rod action (fast, med. fast, med. and slow) via the use of different graphite materials used in one blank they are able to create a flexy rod that is also a fast action rod. In the past, I could pick up a rod and flex it, and know what action it was, but not today. And it is a lot about the tip section. A very thin tip has less wt/mass, and can recover faster than a slightly bigger diameter tip. You need to commit much of casting to motor memory, and that involves lots of casting. The timing of the cast..the backcast is different according to how much line you have out. Casters that learn to haul create a rhythm of casting, and then after they make the power stop at the end of the cast, they don't just stop, and have to guess when a fair amount of line is cast, and determine when it will straighten out in the back. They drift their hand, and forearm back as the line goes back after they make the stop, and create the loop. This greatly improves the timing necessary as to when to go forward, and provides more length to the forecast allowing it to be smoother. Mu manual was only used in our clases, designed for our 3 day classes, and we updated it every so often. i changed the cover on it numerous times as I taught classes for different retail outlets, and Park and Rec Depts. I like to cast different rods with different flexes, and actions from time to time when I'm on the water. Perks my interest in using the right stroke, and timing with a particular rod. And of the more inexpensive rods now on the market. Many use to have too much glass in them, and were way too flexy/sloppy. Today, you can choose a good casting, inexpensive rod that works well in most situations, and you are right, a medium action that a caster can feel load up is a good choice to learn, and fish with. I prefer them to be slightly faster, a med. fast action, but either one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Sayfu summed it up. The line goes where the tip goes.

I'm wondering if the rod has some sort of a super spine. Probably will not do me any good. I have a bad habit of casting with the rod torqued sideways in my hand. Taking the spine out of the equation.

Bass rod manufacturers have already come out with the smaller guides designed for accuracy but I like the idea of a smaller diameter blank.

I also like the idea that accuracy is more important than distance. Because it is.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

You can cast through a whole range of degrees from side arm to across your body, and the principles apply, but the most accurate cast is straight up over your casting eye like shooting a gun. They have those disciplines where you cast into the circles located at different distances, and the cast of choice is straight up over your casting eye. I tend to cast 3/4 when given a choice. My elbow flares out, not kept in..just like I would throw a ball.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

buckhunter..Don't quite know what you mean by "torqued sideways," but, I think Lefty casts that way advocating turning the reel towards you rather than casting with the reel pointed down. The guides then are in better alignment with the line held in the line hand. If you haul, the pull, and then allow the line to go back through the guides as your line hand follows up close to the reel ending somewhat near the reel at the end of the backcast is in line.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 6 days ago

Here is another aspect of these expensive rods you might think about. You just mortgaged the farm, and put down $740 big ones, and several years later they discontinue the rod, and now they advertise you can pick one up at blowout prices!!!! How good does that make you feel? doesn't say much for your investment.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 47 weeks 4 days ago

Sayfu, when I cast the reel is pointed away from me. Not sure but I have always figured it was poor use of the spine. Why put the guides along the spine if I'm just going to use the rod sideways?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 47 weeks 4 days ago

Buckhunter..Got me on that one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 46 weeks 4 days ago

Good suggestion. I brought up this advanced angling situation that often took place in the Fall when BWO's were the only thing going. It is exciting fishing to visible fish, and you can get close to your targets. The fly is small, and if you don't lay it on the water properly it gets pulled under, and won't pop back up. Drag is not your friend, and a dragging fly is seldom taken. Multiple casts often work best, and someone with good line control can cast quickly again, and again getting hookups. Watching big trout suspend, and move around, moving forward, back, side to side, and trying to time your cast, and get a hookup is extremely exciting fly fishing. And frustrating for a guide! Often the client gets excited and casts too far lining the trout, and it puts them down. You have to sit and wait for fish to begin feeding again, and they do not want to wait!.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment