Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Petzal: Silence is Golden

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

April 24, 2009

Petzal: Silence is Golden

By David E. Petzal

I recently returned from the wilds of New Zealand, where things are done somewhat differently. For example, it is perfectly legal for shooters to own suppressed (silenced) firearms. In the USA, if you want to hang a can on the end of your barrel, you need a Class III license or else you go to prison.

This grim-looking fellow—normally he smiles a lot--was my guide. His name is David Blayney, and if he looks military it’s because he was a professional soldier for a number of years. David’s rifle started life as a Tikka, and was converted to a cartridge called the .338 Murmur (or as it’s known in some parts, the .338 BR). This is a 7mm Remington BR case necked up to .338 and loaded with 300-grain bullets loaded to about 1,000 fps. The speed of sound is 1,125 fps, so if the slugs are traveling at less than that, you avoid not only the muzzle blast, but the supersonic crack of a bullet breaking the sound barrier.

The conversion is relatively simple: Your gunsmith saws off the factory barrel to about 12 inches, threads the end, and screws on the silencer. The latter lasts indefinitely, and the only problem associated with it is the gas that’s directed backward onto the barrel’s exterior. You have to unscrew the thing after use and wipe off the powder fouling. Accuracy is extremely good. David showed me a group he’d fired at 200 yards with all three shots touching; it looked like ½-inch to me.

The Murmur also kills animals just fine as long as you observe its range limitations, but since most shots here are taken at 200 yards or less, this is not a problem. How loud is it? I didn’t get to fire the Murmur, but I did shoot a supressed .223 and it had about the report of a .22 LR.

Comments (51)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

My God I want your job Dave.
The only real advantage I can see for having a silencer would be to suppress the sound from echoing off the hills and thru the valleys giving your position away. Up close I'm not sure of its value.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from RipperIII wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I have two buddies who have "suppressed" rifles, one a 22-250, the other a .223
We've shot varnmints,...beaver, coyote and such, at ranges out to 200 yards with most around about 125-150yds.
The animals remaining on their feet don't spook and tend to stay put long enough to allow calm follow up shots.
I am hoping that they will attach night vision scopes so that we can put a slight dent into the hog population on our lease.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I'm with Jim-I want your job, Dave!
Neat little piece, and perfectly legal, hummm.
Did you get any hunting in while you were there, Dave?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cliff68 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I can see in target shooting where a silencer would be nice, but in hunting I rather enjoy hearing the boom and listening to it roll over the hills. It seems like it might take something away from the sport if it sounded like you were shooting game with an air rifle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

With sprawl continuing to eat up the places we all hunt/shoot, suppressed firearms could make for better relationships w/neighbors who don't like to listen to gunfire.

Jim

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MaxPower wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Why the suppressor if the bullet is sub-sonic??

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

"Why the suppressor if the bullet is sub-sonic??"

Because there is still the sound of the charge exploding in the chamber and escaping out the barrel. The suppressor reduces or eliminates most of that sound.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I'm with cliff68; Let me hear the "BOOM"!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Anyone know if the sniper rifle in "Clear and present danger" was an actual weapon, or just a completely made up prop? I never saw a "silenced" rifle while I was on active duty?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Anyone know the requirements to get a Class III license? What a sweet setup. Dave - you said Mr. Blayney was your guide...for what prey? Or is that something we have to wait for the next issue to find out?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

No doubt in a few months there will be a story in the magazine about Dave slaying a huge Red Stag or some other exotic critter from down under.
That is a very interesting rifle. Unfortunately in the wrong hands a poacher could do much damage to the local wildlife with one of those.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from matt28 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Another nice toy to play with... So what were you hunting, Dave? Kiwis? Moas?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

WOW” and I thought I was mortaring rounds at 55gal drums a ½ mile or more with a 45ACP 1911A1!

Couldn’t find a 338 Cal 300 grain Soft Point of hand, so I went with a 250 grain match bullet. With a 100
yard zero it drops -35.3 with 945fps and 496 Energy (ft.-lb.) at 200 yards and -1882.0 with 793fps
and 349 Energy (ft.-lb.) at 1000 yards

http://www.hornady.com/cgi-bin/ball10.cgi?firearm=Long&desc=338+Cal+250+...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Should call it the 338 Lob Lolly!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Would be a heck of an Urban Bear gun.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Well, *my* personal butler has invented a way to equip a fish with a small motorcycle for less than $10K -- which has to be at least as useful as a silenced short range hunting rifle.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A shooting friend has a Colt AR-15 fitted with a silencer from Advanced Armament. The rifle is entertaining to fire since you need no ear protection. The most disconcerting feature of the weapon is that I can hear the action close after each pull of the trigger. I never heard that sound before on a Stoner system rifle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MattB wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

There is a $200 license/tax you must have from BATF that includes background checks before the certificate is issued. You then contact the silencer manufacturer with evidence of this license and pay them $400 to $2000 for the silencer which they then forward all information to BATF before they ship the silencer/suppressor to the FFL dealer that you are having receive the item for you. Other than that it is very simple!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Here in old blighty (UK) moderated rifles are very much the order of the day, and the extension to a firearms cert is granted to protect the shooters hearing. It's primarily a health and safety issue, but they also seem to soften recoil.

SBW

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from LutherMartin1517 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

If it is good enough for the Kiwis it ought to be good enough for us!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

i certainly wish that we american could have silenced toys, if for nothing else than target pracice. hunting with one would be nice as well. and while it seems nice in thought to be able to ccw with a silencer, i would not want to have to pull out a gun with a foot of barrel and silencer on it. not only would it be a slow draw but it would be quite hard to conceal as well. i know, that the suposed reason we can not have them is for criminal use. which makes no sence at all. because the crininals will do what ever they want, reguardles of the laws.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

after playing wif some of the marforsoc silenced rifles i have to say they are awesome. no hearing loss andit is not intimidating. i know my girls would not be afraid to shoot a "quiet" rifle. with how much money we spend on silencing bows, why not our rifles?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A slincer may be very usefull in the coming REVOLUTION :0

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from micko77 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Uses for a suppressor would include, in my world, less worry about hearing loss at the range, being able to shoot a deer with a .357, .41, or.44 Magnum without my ears ringing for two days, not annoying the neighbors around the range (more new houses cropping up in the countryside), and worst case scenario, not having the muzzle blast/flash problems involved with firing a .223 or hot 9mm in my house. Other than that, yeah I guess they'd be useless.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Guys, in my home state of Wisconsin it used to be possible to shoot cans and targets in old abandoned quarries, farms, etc. No more. Why not? Because the Starbucks crowd now lives out there. They move out to the country, hear gunshots, and commence making phone calls to the local sheriff and starting petitions. Viola, a place shooters were able to shoot at for eighty years is now off limits.

If we are going to keep our ranges and hunting privileges in the Age of Obama, we are going to have to learn to be good neighbors to these people. Silencing the guns makes a lot of sense. We can talk big, but we'll be talking big while they escort us off our ranges. The world has changed, Obama voters, and you helped change it. We have to adapt. Silencers are a good thing.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ryan Dufner wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

why do people do stuff like that??
the aswer is simple, b/c we can!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I know a guy who lives in the outskirts or a huge City and shooting and hunting are not allowed. This guy bought a 22 Mag. mounted a high mount scope then went to a Lawn Mower sales office and bought a LAWN mower muffler. He clamped the muffler on the end of his bbl of the 22 mag and it did not interfer wih his high mounted scope.(zeroed for 100 yds) He would sit on his back porch and shoot deer between the eye and ear when ever he needed to refill his freezer. I was at his place one Am when he shot the rifle, and there was no more noise than a BB gun going off.So sound reducers can be obtained with out spending the last $$bucks you got and get results. PS: he only attached the muffler just far back on the bbl for the clamp to hold tight. IT WORKS>. I use battery operated ear muffs when I hunt or shoot and they reduce any noise when the gun goes off, plus enhances my bad hearing when not firing. I think they cost me about l50.00 bucks, worth every dime to save your hearing. I waited to late, lost one ear, but saved the other.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mjenkins1 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

They are practical and fun/interesting, what more could you ask for. Anyone (liberal/anti) who states "Why does anyone need a silencer", has obviously never fired a firearm with a silencer.

By The Way: that mans setup is nice

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I wish they allowed silencers and automatics for the regular using firearms enthusiasts... but unfortunantly, I know it would get way out of hand if they did allow it. So many bad things could happen if weapons like that got into the hands of criminals or poachers... I could only imagine the chaos. Well, even though it would be nice to those who do follow the laws, we must suffer due to the stupidity and selfishness of some.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

As gunslinger pointed out its so easy to make your own moderator (instructions online!) that the ban makes little sense, when was it last challenged and on what grounds?
I would imagine in todays health and safety litigation culture you'd be on to a winner?
SBW

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

For more about the Kiwi fully moderated (length of the barrel) set ups, this article is worth a look - Mark Percy is considered the expert according to my sources down under.

http://home.xtra.co.nz/hosts/suppress/news.htm

SBW

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

What a rig for shooting feral hogs destroying a drop field! Man could I pile up the pork...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

That should have been "crop" field. Sorry...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MattWV wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

As MattB said you do NOT have to possess a Class III license to own a supressor, it's just a $200 tax stamp that is pretty simple to get (assuming you aren't wanted and live in one of the 34 states that allows suppressors).

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I would comment on focus Fronts observation regarding the Obama crowd somehow being the cause of our loss of countryside and the invasion of the "Starbucks Crowd". Yes, we are ALL responsible for what has happened! This is because we as Americans have chosen to view our land as just another commodity to be bought and sold like groceries or motor vehicles, instead of a sacred trust. We have no "land ethic", thus we have converted our landscapes to strip malls, endless highways and future slum housing developments extending to the horizon. We are now paying the price and deservedly so. Sportsman may be more to blame for this atrocity than most, since we all knew better, and have sat on our collective rear-ends and said nothing, while our children's heritage was sold off for mere money. We have gotten what we deserve. How dumb can we be? Americans claim to "love their country", but have forgotten what "our country" really means, and have that love confused with the damn government - who has never been our friend and never will be. Tom

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

There's nothing quite like a full auto mac 10 with a suppressor and subsonic 9mm rounds. Shooting squirrels secretly in the backyard with a suppressed 10/22 and colibri .22 rounds is pretty cool too. The loudest sound of that set-up is the firing pin hitting the shell, and the bullet strike.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from The Armchair Ou... wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

This just in, the Federal government is sponsoring a contest. Make your own suppressor without a Class III license to manufacture one, and you could win an all expenses paid trip to Kansas. That's Leavenworth, Kansas, where you will enjoy the fine accommodations of the Federal prison. Don't try this at home, kids. The Feds have zero sense of humor about this sort of thing.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I plan to try the Lawn Mower muffler on a 22 i have. Got so many Hawks they killing all the squirrels and birds, so gonna do my part.AS i know first hand the slight sound it will make.Maybe we should try this set up in the Wolf/Cougar states and help the game available for our hunts.But I would want something larger than a 22 LR. Saw a muffler for a Lawn Mower ( about 12" long and about 3" in diameter, should work fine with a extra high mounted scope gun just for that purpose.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from KMB33 wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

That rifle looks crazy, and i was just wondering if that is as fast as sound. I just learned it is 765 fps

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from micko77 wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Let's see...build your own suppressor, then use it to kill hawks, both federal offenses. I hope you don't have neighbors like mine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

In the expected "revolution that would be a handy gadget EH?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I wish the Army had used suppressor's during all the shooting I had to do in 27 years, My hearing would be normal instead of chirping at me all the time!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I live out in the country, way off the raod in the woods. All my neighbors are hunters and feel as i do. We all are declaring war on the Hawks,Yotes, foxes, etc. Trying to save our Birds and small game as well as the Turkeys. Our Turkey crops is about l/2 of normal.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

If all of your neighbors are also gung-hoe law breakers like you, then why do you need to add creating a home-made suppresor to your list of charges?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

So I can hunt the ajoining farm where most of the Hawks are nesting now. And, we do not feel as if we breaking th law, we are saving the smaller game. What Idiot passed the Law about HAWKS must be the same guy who is bitching about saving the WOLF,bears. Who's helpig who, we hunters protecting the small game, birds, rabbits, squirels, turney's Quail, etc, or the care less so called hunters for large game only. Let me get my sights on Hawks, Wolves, Coyotes, Foxes and they dead animals. If in doubt, just go West and see the fewer animals where the Wolf,Grizs and Cougar has taken over.Or come here to my farm and see the few small animals left now.Sometimes animals need or help as well as well we can provide. Ask the Rancher out West what he thinks about the P/D's that break his fine horses, cows legs in thir holes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from NolanOsborne wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Gunslinger..
Last I checked, Squirrels bred 4 to 6 times a year, and Hawks didn't.
Hawks are most likely protected in your area for a good reason. I am pretty sure DDT wiped out a lot of air born predators, and in many areas they still have not come back.
Breaking the law and shooting game illegally creates a bad rep for ALL hunters.
Take that into consideration next time you use your Walmart silencer on a hawk.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I'd drop a dime on someone who shoots a hawk.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Silencers are legal in my state (NC) however they are prohibited for hunting purposes. Go figure! Also if you use a silencer regularly expect greater barrel and throat erosion and reduced barrel life. Due to the way a silencer works, it holds the hot gases in the barrel and breach a split second longer. Over time this is enough to cause premature wear to the barrel and mess with accuracy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

Gunslinger,

If the hawks weren't eating the squirrels and rabbits, then you would be bitching about them raiding your garden and bird feeder.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

I think it would take a gadzillion rounds or .22 LR fired through a suppressed barrel to erode a modern steel rimfire rifle given the relatively low pressure and gas volume of the .22 LR. Accuracy may suffer due to the design of a homemade supressor if the gas flow in the suppressor is uneven while the bullet is in the supressor volume.

We have more raptors where I live than Carter has got little pills, so any previos damage done by DDT is long gone. I have only killed one hawk that developed an appetite for my hens.....perfectly legal in the act of predation. Tactics to scare it away had failed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Free Man wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

"Sounds" like a wonderful OSHA hunter safety device!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

Hunt Fish Sleep Do not plant a Garden, but do hunt small/large game. As for bbl wear out, what does a 22 mag cost???? not nearly as much as my 06's. Address your comments to the preditors who kill the small game. When was the last time you saw a covey of Quail or a few Rabbits, but you Sleep,Right? so you don;t get up early enough to see Rabbits in AM.We enjoy watching teh squirrels, rabbis when can see the, but the HAWKS are killers of such. So I will continue to help the small crittrs out. No rason to own a shotgun here, as all its good for is slugs for Deer. O well, so far this Blog is for all to express their opinions, so do so and so will I. By the way, the Lawn Mower muffler works and is much cheaper than a true muzzle break. May try on a 06 to see if reduces recoil any? What is the difference in the Wolf,fox and Cougar than the HAWK? only 2 many is all of each.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from libertyfirst wrote 2 years 51 weeks ago

I was growling to the local warden the other day about the over abundance of turkey on my property. I've managed for grouse but the population keeps going down or at less it seems that way to me. I suspect that the huge roaming flocks of turkey are breaking and eating the eggs. The warden tells me that I'm crazy and that the real culprit are the ever increasing hawk and owl population. I'm constantly on my land and I see as many as 4-5 large birds of prey each and every day. They have certainly made a big comeback here. I know that this isn't a response to the silencer issue but I do agree with gunslinger that hawks are certainly common, as least here in Maine. I don't agree that we should be shooting them, but soon the fish and wildlife department will have to have some limited shooting to control them to reasonable levels.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Well, *my* personal butler has invented a way to equip a fish with a small motorcycle for less than $10K -- which has to be at least as useful as a silenced short range hunting rifle.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Here in old blighty (UK) moderated rifles are very much the order of the day, and the extension to a firearms cert is granted to protect the shooters hearing. It's primarily a health and safety issue, but they also seem to soften recoil.

SBW

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from LutherMartin1517 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

If it is good enough for the Kiwis it ought to be good enough for us!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I would comment on focus Fronts observation regarding the Obama crowd somehow being the cause of our loss of countryside and the invasion of the "Starbucks Crowd". Yes, we are ALL responsible for what has happened! This is because we as Americans have chosen to view our land as just another commodity to be bought and sold like groceries or motor vehicles, instead of a sacred trust. We have no "land ethic", thus we have converted our landscapes to strip malls, endless highways and future slum housing developments extending to the horizon. We are now paying the price and deservedly so. Sportsman may be more to blame for this atrocity than most, since we all knew better, and have sat on our collective rear-ends and said nothing, while our children's heritage was sold off for mere money. We have gotten what we deserve. How dumb can we be? Americans claim to "love their country", but have forgotten what "our country" really means, and have that love confused with the damn government - who has never been our friend and never will be. Tom

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

My God I want your job Dave.
The only real advantage I can see for having a silencer would be to suppress the sound from echoing off the hills and thru the valleys giving your position away. Up close I'm not sure of its value.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

With sprawl continuing to eat up the places we all hunt/shoot, suppressed firearms could make for better relationships w/neighbors who don't like to listen to gunfire.

Jim

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Anyone know the requirements to get a Class III license? What a sweet setup. Dave - you said Mr. Blayney was your guide...for what prey? Or is that something we have to wait for the next issue to find out?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Would be a heck of an Urban Bear gun.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A shooting friend has a Colt AR-15 fitted with a silencer from Advanced Armament. The rifle is entertaining to fire since you need no ear protection. The most disconcerting feature of the weapon is that I can hear the action close after each pull of the trigger. I never heard that sound before on a Stoner system rifle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MattB wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

There is a $200 license/tax you must have from BATF that includes background checks before the certificate is issued. You then contact the silencer manufacturer with evidence of this license and pay them $400 to $2000 for the silencer which they then forward all information to BATF before they ship the silencer/suppressor to the FFL dealer that you are having receive the item for you. Other than that it is very simple!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Guys, in my home state of Wisconsin it used to be possible to shoot cans and targets in old abandoned quarries, farms, etc. No more. Why not? Because the Starbucks crowd now lives out there. They move out to the country, hear gunshots, and commence making phone calls to the local sheriff and starting petitions. Viola, a place shooters were able to shoot at for eighty years is now off limits.

If we are going to keep our ranges and hunting privileges in the Age of Obama, we are going to have to learn to be good neighbors to these people. Silencing the guns makes a lot of sense. We can talk big, but we'll be talking big while they escort us off our ranges. The world has changed, Obama voters, and you helped change it. We have to adapt. Silencers are a good thing.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I know a guy who lives in the outskirts or a huge City and shooting and hunting are not allowed. This guy bought a 22 Mag. mounted a high mount scope then went to a Lawn Mower sales office and bought a LAWN mower muffler. He clamped the muffler on the end of his bbl of the 22 mag and it did not interfer wih his high mounted scope.(zeroed for 100 yds) He would sit on his back porch and shoot deer between the eye and ear when ever he needed to refill his freezer. I was at his place one Am when he shot the rifle, and there was no more noise than a BB gun going off.So sound reducers can be obtained with out spending the last $$bucks you got and get results. PS: he only attached the muffler just far back on the bbl for the clamp to hold tight. IT WORKS>. I use battery operated ear muffs when I hunt or shoot and they reduce any noise when the gun goes off, plus enhances my bad hearing when not firing. I think they cost me about l50.00 bucks, worth every dime to save your hearing. I waited to late, lost one ear, but saved the other.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mjenkins1 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

They are practical and fun/interesting, what more could you ask for. Anyone (liberal/anti) who states "Why does anyone need a silencer", has obviously never fired a firearm with a silencer.

By The Way: that mans setup is nice

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I'd drop a dime on someone who shoots a hawk.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I'm with Jim-I want your job, Dave!
Neat little piece, and perfectly legal, hummm.
Did you get any hunting in while you were there, Dave?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cliff68 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I can see in target shooting where a silencer would be nice, but in hunting I rather enjoy hearing the boom and listening to it roll over the hills. It seems like it might take something away from the sport if it sounded like you were shooting game with an air rifle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MaxPower wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Why the suppressor if the bullet is sub-sonic??

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

"Why the suppressor if the bullet is sub-sonic??"

Because there is still the sound of the charge exploding in the chamber and escaping out the barrel. The suppressor reduces or eliminates most of that sound.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I'm with cliff68; Let me hear the "BOOM"!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Anyone know if the sniper rifle in "Clear and present danger" was an actual weapon, or just a completely made up prop? I never saw a "silenced" rifle while I was on active duty?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

No doubt in a few months there will be a story in the magazine about Dave slaying a huge Red Stag or some other exotic critter from down under.
That is a very interesting rifle. Unfortunately in the wrong hands a poacher could do much damage to the local wildlife with one of those.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from matt28 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Another nice toy to play with... So what were you hunting, Dave? Kiwis? Moas?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

WOW” and I thought I was mortaring rounds at 55gal drums a ½ mile or more with a 45ACP 1911A1!

Couldn’t find a 338 Cal 300 grain Soft Point of hand, so I went with a 250 grain match bullet. With a 100
yard zero it drops -35.3 with 945fps and 496 Energy (ft.-lb.) at 200 yards and -1882.0 with 793fps
and 349 Energy (ft.-lb.) at 1000 yards

http://www.hornady.com/cgi-bin/ball10.cgi?firearm=Long&desc=338+Cal+250+...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Should call it the 338 Lob Lolly!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

i certainly wish that we american could have silenced toys, if for nothing else than target pracice. hunting with one would be nice as well. and while it seems nice in thought to be able to ccw with a silencer, i would not want to have to pull out a gun with a foot of barrel and silencer on it. not only would it be a slow draw but it would be quite hard to conceal as well. i know, that the suposed reason we can not have them is for criminal use. which makes no sence at all. because the crininals will do what ever they want, reguardles of the laws.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from deanlikes2fish wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

after playing wif some of the marforsoc silenced rifles i have to say they are awesome. no hearing loss andit is not intimidating. i know my girls would not be afraid to shoot a "quiet" rifle. with how much money we spend on silencing bows, why not our rifles?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from micko77 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Uses for a suppressor would include, in my world, less worry about hearing loss at the range, being able to shoot a deer with a .357, .41, or.44 Magnum without my ears ringing for two days, not annoying the neighbors around the range (more new houses cropping up in the countryside), and worst case scenario, not having the muzzle blast/flash problems involved with firing a .223 or hot 9mm in my house. Other than that, yeah I guess they'd be useless.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ryan Dufner wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

why do people do stuff like that??
the aswer is simple, b/c we can!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I wish they allowed silencers and automatics for the regular using firearms enthusiasts... but unfortunantly, I know it would get way out of hand if they did allow it. So many bad things could happen if weapons like that got into the hands of criminals or poachers... I could only imagine the chaos. Well, even though it would be nice to those who do follow the laws, we must suffer due to the stupidity and selfishness of some.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

For more about the Kiwi fully moderated (length of the barrel) set ups, this article is worth a look - Mark Percy is considered the expert according to my sources down under.

http://home.xtra.co.nz/hosts/suppress/news.htm

SBW

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

What a rig for shooting feral hogs destroying a drop field! Man could I pile up the pork...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

That should have been "crop" field. Sorry...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

There's nothing quite like a full auto mac 10 with a suppressor and subsonic 9mm rounds. Shooting squirrels secretly in the backyard with a suppressed 10/22 and colibri .22 rounds is pretty cool too. The loudest sound of that set-up is the firing pin hitting the shell, and the bullet strike.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from The Armchair Ou... wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

This just in, the Federal government is sponsoring a contest. Make your own suppressor without a Class III license to manufacture one, and you could win an all expenses paid trip to Kansas. That's Leavenworth, Kansas, where you will enjoy the fine accommodations of the Federal prison. Don't try this at home, kids. The Feds have zero sense of humor about this sort of thing.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from micko77 wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Let's see...build your own suppressor, then use it to kill hawks, both federal offenses. I hope you don't have neighbors like mine.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RipperIII wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I have two buddies who have "suppressed" rifles, one a 22-250, the other a .223
We've shot varnmints,...beaver, coyote and such, at ranges out to 200 yards with most around about 125-150yds.
The animals remaining on their feet don't spook and tend to stay put long enough to allow calm follow up shots.
I am hoping that they will attach night vision scopes so that we can put a slight dent into the hog population on our lease.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A slincer may be very usefull in the coming REVOLUTION :0

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from suburban bushwacker wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

As gunslinger pointed out its so easy to make your own moderator (instructions online!) that the ban makes little sense, when was it last challenged and on what grounds?
I would imagine in todays health and safety litigation culture you'd be on to a winner?
SBW

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MattWV wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

As MattB said you do NOT have to possess a Class III license to own a supressor, it's just a $200 tax stamp that is pretty simple to get (assuming you aren't wanted and live in one of the 34 states that allows suppressors).

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from KMB33 wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

That rifle looks crazy, and i was just wondering if that is as fast as sound. I just learned it is 765 fps

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

In the expected "revolution that would be a handy gadget EH?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I wish the Army had used suppressor's during all the shooting I had to do in 27 years, My hearing would be normal instead of chirping at me all the time!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I live out in the country, way off the raod in the woods. All my neighbors are hunters and feel as i do. We all are declaring war on the Hawks,Yotes, foxes, etc. Trying to save our Birds and small game as well as the Turkeys. Our Turkey crops is about l/2 of normal.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

If all of your neighbors are also gung-hoe law breakers like you, then why do you need to add creating a home-made suppresor to your list of charges?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from NolanOsborne wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Gunslinger..
Last I checked, Squirrels bred 4 to 6 times a year, and Hawks didn't.
Hawks are most likely protected in your area for a good reason. I am pretty sure DDT wiped out a lot of air born predators, and in many areas they still have not come back.
Breaking the law and shooting game illegally creates a bad rep for ALL hunters.
Take that into consideration next time you use your Walmart silencer on a hawk.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

Silencers are legal in my state (NC) however they are prohibited for hunting purposes. Go figure! Also if you use a silencer regularly expect greater barrel and throat erosion and reduced barrel life. Due to the way a silencer works, it holds the hot gases in the barrel and breach a split second longer. Over time this is enough to cause premature wear to the barrel and mess with accuracy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

Gunslinger,

If the hawks weren't eating the squirrels and rabbits, then you would be bitching about them raiding your garden and bird feeder.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

I think it would take a gadzillion rounds or .22 LR fired through a suppressed barrel to erode a modern steel rimfire rifle given the relatively low pressure and gas volume of the .22 LR. Accuracy may suffer due to the design of a homemade supressor if the gas flow in the suppressor is uneven while the bullet is in the supressor volume.

We have more raptors where I live than Carter has got little pills, so any previos damage done by DDT is long gone. I have only killed one hawk that developed an appetite for my hens.....perfectly legal in the act of predation. Tactics to scare it away had failed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Free Man wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

"Sounds" like a wonderful OSHA hunter safety device!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from libertyfirst wrote 2 years 51 weeks ago

I was growling to the local warden the other day about the over abundance of turkey on my property. I've managed for grouse but the population keeps going down or at less it seems that way to me. I suspect that the huge roaming flocks of turkey are breaking and eating the eggs. The warden tells me that I'm crazy and that the real culprit are the ever increasing hawk and owl population. I'm constantly on my land and I see as many as 4-5 large birds of prey each and every day. They have certainly made a big comeback here. I know that this isn't a response to the silencer issue but I do agree with gunslinger that hawks are certainly common, as least here in Maine. I don't agree that we should be shooting them, but soon the fish and wildlife department will have to have some limited shooting to control them to reasonable levels.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

So I can hunt the ajoining farm where most of the Hawks are nesting now. And, we do not feel as if we breaking th law, we are saving the smaller game. What Idiot passed the Law about HAWKS must be the same guy who is bitching about saving the WOLF,bears. Who's helpig who, we hunters protecting the small game, birds, rabbits, squirels, turney's Quail, etc, or the care less so called hunters for large game only. Let me get my sights on Hawks, Wolves, Coyotes, Foxes and they dead animals. If in doubt, just go West and see the fewer animals where the Wolf,Grizs and Cougar has taken over.Or come here to my farm and see the few small animals left now.Sometimes animals need or help as well as well we can provide. Ask the Rancher out West what he thinks about the P/D's that break his fine horses, cows legs in thir holes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

Hunt Fish Sleep Do not plant a Garden, but do hunt small/large game. As for bbl wear out, what does a 22 mag cost???? not nearly as much as my 06's. Address your comments to the preditors who kill the small game. When was the last time you saw a covey of Quail or a few Rabbits, but you Sleep,Right? so you don;t get up early enough to see Rabbits in AM.We enjoy watching teh squirrels, rabbis when can see the, but the HAWKS are killers of such. So I will continue to help the small crittrs out. No rason to own a shotgun here, as all its good for is slugs for Deer. O well, so far this Blog is for all to express their opinions, so do so and so will I. By the way, the Lawn Mower muffler works and is much cheaper than a true muzzle break. May try on a 06 to see if reduces recoil any? What is the difference in the Wolf,fox and Cougar than the HAWK? only 2 many is all of each.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 3 years 3 weeks ago

I plan to try the Lawn Mower muffler on a 22 i have. Got so many Hawks they killing all the squirrels and birds, so gonna do my part.AS i know first hand the slight sound it will make.Maybe we should try this set up in the Wolf/Cougar states and help the game available for our hunts.But I would want something larger than a 22 LR. Saw a muffler for a Lawn Mower ( about 12" long and about 3" in diameter, should work fine with a extra high mounted scope gun just for that purpose.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs