


June 26, 2009
Petzal: On Barrel Life and Women Shooters
In 1988 I got a varmint rifle from Ultra Light Arms in .22/250 with a stainless barrel. I shot it at groundhogs, and prairie dogs, and tested ammo with it, and I noticed recently that it was not grouping as it had. My best loads when the gun was new went into .365 (five-shot groups at 100 yards) and now about the best it would do was .650 and change. So I stuck in the borescope and beheld a scene of horror. The bore was alligatored right up to the muzzle. So it is at the gunsmith now, where it will get a new Hart implant. But 21 years and God knows how many rounds is not bad. Take care of them and they last a long time.
****
I’ve long believed that women make better rifle shots than men, and learn faster, and in the past two weeks I got a demonstration of that. Two weeks apart, I pulled targets for a Ladies’ Day match, and then for a Father/Son shoot. It was all .22 rimfire, prone, at bull’s-eye targets. The ages of the boys ran from 12 to 18, and the ladies, 12 to 40 plus. Having scored every one of the targets, I can tell you that the ladies outshot the boys by a mile. Oh my goodness, it was not even close, even allowing for the fact that some of the women had been at it for years. And one of the two best women’s scores—a possible by 4X—was shot by a girl who had never picked up a rifle before.
Comments (44)
I lose sleep about my rem 722 257 roberts barrel. I know one day it won't shoot like it does now, which is one ragged clover leaf at 100 with federal 120 tp partitions. This rifle is in it's factory wood stock, no glass, no pillars, and the only thing on it that is not factory is the tuned up 3 lb trigger, like glass...
I don't have the heart to rebarrel this old work horse. With all my other rifles I would never hesitate to rebarrel one, most of them are semi customs with aftermarket barrels anyway, that's part of the joy of living in the future- now that it's the year 2000 and we all have jet cars- wait, nevermind, not so... BUT there are smiths everywhere that can spin on great barrels and get you amazing accuracy for a great price. Nothing better than being a rifle freak in todays world. SUB MOA rifles for less than 500 bucks from the factory. Keep those crowns protected and keep em clean!
I still remember being 12 years old and taking gun safety training here in MN. All of the guy bragging and waiting for the last day when we shot targets. Jackie Graner schooled us all.
Dave, if my 39-year-old .22/250 still shot five-shot groups in .650" I wouldn't touch it, let alone get it rebarreled! You certainly are demanding in accuracy expectations.
I thoroughly enjoyed your recent F & S article on "no B.S. accuracy", including your usual dry wit.
My girlfriend shot for the 1st ever several months ago. 25 yards. She was using my Ruger Mark III Hunter. 22LR. She drilled the target time after time that day. From both the sitting and standing positions. She is signed up for an all day Ladies Day at the Range in a few weeks. Her accuracy was amazing. I am very proud of her. We go to the range together alot now. She said it was important for her to know how to handle a gun and feel comfortable around them. I could not be happier.
It's a scientific "fact" that the lady's have better hand/eye skills than men.
As for the .22-250, with groups like that you want to change barrels? WHY ?
I've been shooting relatively seriously since I was about 8 or 10 years old (I'm now 30). I've won a few matches here and there, and while I'm not world class, I'm a pretty good shot. My wife has been shooting sporadically for about 7 years - that is to say a little less than the time that has elapsed since we met, and she usually only shoots a few times a year. On on of her good-shooting days, she is only a marginally poorer shot than me - leading me to the conclusion that if she shot as regularly and seriously as I, there would be no contest.
I remember as a kid begging my mom to join in on our 22lr and pellet rifle shooting competitions while out camping, after being out shot by her on multiple occasions I quit asking her to join in. She could go years with out pulling a trigger, then pick up whatever gun and out shoot us all....
Good GOD Dave; change a barrel shooting under an inch at a 100yds!? You, Sir, have high standards for your rifles!
I believe the female sex, on average, does shoot better then men.I saw this many-a-time in the military/range qalfy shoots. Oh, speaking of women at the shooting range@ while shooting my X16 for qualification to Police training I happen to be assigned a "girl" range officer....that chewed tobacco,raw cut,that is, which unfortunately during one of her "spits" found the forearm of my rifle. A big honkin brown gob it.
Now, this was not pleasant memory, but I thought you all wouldn't mind a little military humor to chew on...
Dave,
Having spent a good portion of my Army career training soldiers to shoot I have no doubt you are correct about women shooters.
The one and only rifle I've seen the barrel shot out was a custom 264 Mag varmint outfit.
Women indeed seem to be better rifle and wing shots and, seem to be better horse riders. Worse, I think some comic said women have half the money and all the pu**y.
All the more reason for guys to keep these Battle Queens barefoot and in line. :-)
175rltw
I had a 722 that shot extremely well, but was sold to help finance an elk hunt. Duh.
My current Ruger M-77 and Winchester M-70 .257's shoot Federal 120 gr partitions very well and 100 gr Hornady handloads. My Savage 110, one of the few factory barreled in .257 Roberts, did not shoot the Federal 120 gr partitions particularly well, but shot 100 gr Ballistic Tips into ragged hole groups.
Still looking for another 722.......
Mark-1
He was no comic....
When its time to rebarrel you might as well give it up and have another tube put on the action. I had a rifle built about three years ago so chambered that when they were told my load, Douglas Barrels said the barrel might go 500-600 rounds. I have been somewhat careful with the shooting and am at 400 shots. So far so good as the interior of the barrel still looks fine but then maybe it will all go at once. Until then I will continue to enjoy it but maybe next time choose another chambering.
If you look back at some of my postings you will note that for decades I have claimed that especially females who have received no previous firearms training seem to advance at least as quick and usually become more proficient than their male counterparts. This is not always the case but often is true. What is discourageing is that time in the life of a fine you lady when she starts wearing bras and makeup which means they are thinking about boys. At that point often shooting is not so important although it very well may return sometime in their twenties. Just my casual observations.
in the above post it should read "fine young lady" not "fine you lady", damned old funbling fingers in too big a rush
I shot an old m98 rebarreled in 1947 to 3006 when i was in the youth division of the homeguard. this was oh well 16 years ago and the barrel by then had had some where in bewteen 50-75000 rounds through it.. inside the barrel looked so ragged that the bullet would need a map and compass to find its way out.. but still it shot such close groups that i could nail a skeet as a target if i did my job right at 200 yards.. (this was back when my eyesight was better and it was with original open sights and military stock) so i hunted with it and thought it pretty accurate..
and im afraid i have to admit that my 60 year old mom outshoots me with a pellet gun every time:(
(but not with anything that actually goes bang cos she then closes her eyes and turn her head away:P )
Just hope i get to teach my daughter be4 boy fever sets on:P
I agree w/you Dave. My wife and daughter both shoot excellent. Yes, you do have some very demanding criteria for accuracy.
I've noticed that women with minimal or no shooting exposure make good students and often outshoot men.
Maybe it's because they didn't play cowboys and indians or cops and robbers. Or more to the point, because they have no pre-conceived ideas on how to do it.
This after 28 years as an Air Force instructor.
(I will say however, they do get a slack-jawed grin after automatic fire !)
Dave; and all; I think most are missing the point altogether. The stated fact is that the group size has approximately doubled. I agree completely, time to rebarrel. This is no place for sentiment, that old barrel has been a good one, but she's gone. I've shot out 2 barrels on .22/250s, and 1 more that had started to go, when another fellow thought he could use it to advantage, because it would still group .500 to 675 consistently, and offered me nearly twice what I paid for it. I sold it to him, and never lost a minute of sleep over the sale.
As I read recently, there are a dozen companies making barrels for a living as I type this, why deprive of them of their livelihood?
Hers David’s proof!
Back in may of 85, had the Colonels teenage Daughter Sandra Worman wanted to shoot High Power. MSgt Mike Woodruff and I started and kept her in small bore. In June 86 she was at the Whittington Center for the Olympic try outs.
A couple years ago my wife made a 120 yard shot on a hog that I couldn't find the bullet wound on. I looked and looked in all the usual places.... then I saw it..... right between the eyes. I glanced back at her and she had a wry grin on her face.
Do NOT mess with that woman.
Dave what happens to those old barrels? Could yours be rebored in say 250 Savage and would it shoot as well it did as a 22-250?
You are right about the ladies. My daughter became a better shot than her brothers after a minimum amount of time and effort.
I wonder if the difference between boys and girls shooting is more physical or mental?
As was mentioned above, the boys bragging about how well they will do, the girls not.
Could it simply be that the guys have in their heads that they are naturally good shots because they are guys and don't need to learn anything new because they already "know" how to do it?
Whereas the girls have no pre-concieved notions and pay more attention to instructions and what they are doing at the firing line?
Since I've never shot the barrel out of one of my guns, I'll restrict my comment to women. My wife's a pro golfer and as I watch her and other women golfers, there's a marked difference in the deliberation and mechanics of their swing/game, versus men. They stay truer in technique. My 3 daughters all shoot pistol with me and they seem to be naturals. They don't care about exactly how well they do, they just do well. They do listen and put teaching into play. My boys at best, partially do. When my wife had her first opportunity to shoot pistol, darn it all if the only handgun I had with me was my Super Redhawk, 44 mag. So her first exposure was that, and she put a fist-sized group together from 25 yards! Her only naive comment was "are these things all this loud?"
I think women are more patient, "really" willing to learn, and not so bravado-oriented as many of us guys.
Thanks!
Loved this comment, Dave, and have shared some of the same observations about females and gunpowder. Having taught riflery at some Summer Christian Camps, I would traditionally have a shoot off on Fridays. The boys would not even come close to winning that match. On the other hand, the girls seemed nonchalant about their scores, like 'anybody can do it.'
My Mom confiscated Dad's 722 in .222...she enjoyed shooting jackrabbits out in the boonies in West Texas, while Dad and I enjoyed prairie dog town shooting with it. It still places them in the 10 ring, and now I am on the watch for any caliber 722.
Nice blog.
Blue
All:
Last week I took my daughter's Browning A-Bolt in 22-250 to the gunsmith for a new barrel. I bought the rifle several years ago, used but in excellent shape, and with it came several targets with smaller than 1/2" groups in them (at 100 yards) as proof of accuracy. The rifle has Browning's BOSS ("Ballistic Optimized Shooting System," or something like that) installed on it, which is nothing more than a muzzle brake on the end of the barrel you can rotate and adjust to minimize or eliminate barrel vibrations so as to obtain tighter groups.
(As an aside, the BOSS system works in a healthy barrel; I've gotten groups of around .318" or so on many occasions with that rifle. The system also reduces the 22-250's recoil to that of a .22 rimfire. On the other hand, the BOSS system is nuclear-blast level loud, and it produces tremendous muzzle blast, too, thus pretty much eliminating prone position shots from the ground unless you like a tornado blast of dirt and dust and grit and grass in your face every time you shoot. Double ear protection is vital, and eye protection, too.)
I'm replacing the barrel on the A-Bolt because the rifle will not consistently shoot groups under 1" anymore, but also, and equally importantly (at least to me), the rifle can no longer handle handloads which used to shoot perfectly fine in it, perfectly normal handloads straight out of Nosler's reloading manuals. The bolt now gets stiff after a round is fired and I've blown several primers on loads that once fired and emptied without the slightest problem whatsoever. (I theorize this development is due to throat and chamber erosion, and even though I have scrubbed the barrel with everything and anything several gunshops have been eager to sell me, the problem only gets worse as more rounds are put through the barrel.) Also, and not only with the handloads but also with Remington or Winchester factory rounds that I've chronographed many times, the muzzle velocity of the rifle has dropped 150-200 fps per round on average. (Why this is so, I'm still puzzling over.) So, no more procrastination. New barrel time. (I've ordered a Douglas premium air-gauged barrel, 24".)
In terms of women being better natural shots than men, I concur completely. Although my 14-year old daughter is far more interested in social activities with her pals these days than she is in going to the range (or, sadly, out into the wilds), a couple of weeks ago I managed to get her, a friend of hers, the friend's (beautiful) mom and myself out to the range for a day of shooting. I barely outshot my daughter and her friend. (I practice a lot and my daughter rarely practices at all; her friend had only shot a rifle half a dozen times before in her whole life.) As I was getting into position to take a 300-yard shot at a small water-filled plastic jug with my daughter's .257 Roberts (using handloads, of course), I heard my daughter quietly snicker, whisper, and half-apologize to her friend--I'm not totally deaf yet, though my daughter thinks so--the following: (a)"Don't hold your breath waiting for my dad to take his shot; it takes him forever and a day to get into position and pull the goddam*ed trigger"; and (b) "He's getting old and can't see like he used to. He's probably going to miss the bottle. We're gonna kick his ass out here, you'll see." (Oh, the impertinence and insolence of youth!) I beat them, but not by much. With a little practice, they could outshoot me without much effort at all.
I've taught every woman in my office (past and present) how to shoot pistols and rifles. All of the ladies (but for one who has a tendency to close her eyes just before pulling the trigger) are natural born excellent shooters. I had to work hard to outperform them. I would certainly never want to be downrange of any of them if they were really, really angry.
TWD
Holy half minute of angle Batman, re-barrel a rifle that shoots .650" @ 100 yards? First of all I would never be able to come to the realization that my rifle had changed from .365" to .650" because let's face it most rifles are more accurate than the owner.
Secondly women are pretty much better than men at any endeavor that does not require brute strength or tearing things up or a desire for a near death experience... They are more meticulous and have smaller fingers and better control and their sense of touch is enhanced by delicate skin with no callouses.
My oldest .22-250, a Rem 700BDL "Varmint" purchased in early 1975 (I'm using it in my profile photo) has digested more than 4,400 rounds, 98% of them are handloads that deliver a bit over 3400 fps when they were last chronographed. The rifle is a bit past its prime - I can certainly identify with that - but it's still a varmint-destroyer! I'd say it's a candidate for a Hart, Pac-Nor or Shilen barrel, but I still wouldn't hesitate to take it afield for another coyote trip.
That is why I am thankful why many women don't hunt... imagine if they did... men would have nothing to shoot at. lol
Women, perhaps, may be better intrinsic shots than men, on average. But I tend to believe that men make better use of weapons overall.
Skill does not matter if the intent is lacking.
Regarding women and shooting: I observe that most young (and not-so-young) novice male shooters approach the firing line with the presupposition that proficiency with firearms is provided by the "Y" chromosome. As a coach and instructor, it was annoying to see a "know it all" attitude in a lad who obviously did not know it all, didn't hold or handle a sidearm properly, and couldn't hit a bull in the derriere with a bass fiddle if he were standing next to the creature.
On the occasions I coached Women Marines, they were generally receptive to instruction, attentive to detail and noticeably more consistent. I chalked the difference up to male ego and hubris.
My wife and daughter have been familiarized with firearms, and they've done remarkably well; however, despite what appears to be an innate talent, neither is inclined to adopt shooting as a recreational outlet. My son has been shooting with me for some time and will go active in the U.S. Navy in a few weeks. He has done a fine job on the range and he's a good shooter. I've enjoyed our time on the range.
Years ago, a young lady was on the pistol line at the South Coast Gun Club in Irvine, CA. She was very competent, very accurate. During a target break, she asked,
"Did you teach pistol at MCAS El Toro in 1968?" That was more than a dozen years in the past, but I nodded, "Yes, I did." She smiled and answered, "You were my coach. I remember you! Thank you. I'm a deputy with the Orange County Sheriff Department now." I smiled and commented, "You've obviously learned well; I've watched your targets and your shooting surpasses me. Well done!" I had considerable respect for the OCSD and thanked her for taking a challenging job with a good department.
I remember shooting M&P Matches at the San Diego Police Range when I was 21, and the pistol line was dominated by salty, paunchy old devils who had done through truckloads of brass in their shooting careers. They sized up the competition and completely overlooked a young woman, an Air Force lieutenant weighing no more than 105 lbs. When the last round had been been fired and the scores were posted on the Wailing Wall, that young woman took 1st Place...and deserved it.
Shooting can be a great lesson in humility. These are rifles and pistols, not broadswords. Do not assume that upper body strength is an advantage. It doesn't take a 17-inch bicep to shoot well. And if your coach is a woman, listen attentively and respectfully, be thankful for the guidance, and shoot with your sidearm, not your mouth.
Dave, I'm all for accuracy but you've mentioned before how we are unnecessarily "sub-moa crazy" these days. I think you must be "king of the ward" -- if there is such a thing.
When my sister lived alone due to her husband's military commitments, my Dad bought her a sweet little S&W revolver -- something akin to the Model 36 but chambered in .32 long. When she was taken out to learn to shoot it, she was gangling and awkward; had to hold her hand over one eye to aim -- but proceeded to drill each can from about 10 yards! After each shot the can would fly but she would still ask, "did I hit it?"
To All, regarding the .650 MOA barrel I scrapped. Back in the mid 80s, I visited a gunmaker named Seeley Masker who lived just down the road from me. Seeley built benchrest rifles. I asked him if he would make me a 2.2/250 that would keep five shots in half an inch. His eyes rolled back in his head and foam collected on his lips. I thought he was having a stroke. "HALF INCH?" he bellowed. "MY RIFLES PUT FIVE SHOTS THROUGH THE SAME HOLE."
After he calmed down we agreed he would build the gun, and it did put five shots in .300 and a bit, and he also built a .220 Swift that would group into a quarter inch.
The point to all this is that you can get sub-half-minute rifles from a number of people, and that extreme accuracy is the point of the exercise, so once it's gone, you need a new barrel. Thank you for listening.
That should, by the way, be .22/250.
Time for me to rebarrel an old workhorse. My old M-77 7mm Mag is getting to be a 2 inch rifle. When I got it (used from a pawnshop) in 1993 it shot the group of my life (1 15/16 inch at 300)on the day I discovered that it LOVED the 140 gr partition load from Federal. sub-moa groups were easy. A roof leak that saturated the gun case for months before being found in 2000 rusted the bore terribly. Groups immediately went to 1 1/2 inches and have gone steadily downhill since. Question for Dave: When was the M-77 made with a sliding tang safety akin to the Mossberg 500?
I hate to change up the gun as most of my whitetail shots are 15-80 yds with the occasional 200 yarder on a powerline R.O.W but I love busting the occasional coyote at 400 in my hayfield in summer
I can't imagine how many rifles have been sold with coyotes, prairie dogs, marmots, and other varmints as the targets of choice. They've provided the incentive for many of my purchases!
Dave Petzal, I know you don't need anyone to give you "+'s" or "-'s" since you are already a 5 star general on the F&S website but I gave you a "+" anyway just for being polite.
I have this women being good shots thing figured out. Many years ago I took my wife on her first trip ever to the range and let her fire my Ruger 10/22; her first time shooting a firearm. And she promptly shot the bullseye out of the target. She also did OK with a .30 cal carbine that same day; I wouldn't have wanted her shooting at me. The secret? She knew nothing about guns or how they work, ballistics, this ammo versus that ammo, any of that stuff, nor did she care. She just took the rifle and did what I told her to do.
By BamaHunter "A roof leak that saturated the gun case for months before being found in 2000 rusted the bore terribly."
You leave your guns cased for months on end? Or are you talking gun cabinet?
I left a shotgun cased for a week once and was shocked to see the nice blued barrel had turned to mostly reddish rust, luckily it was light and a good aggressive oil rubdown got it almost back to it's pre cased look. All guns come out of cases as soon as I'm home now.
I is a woman with calluses (and I'll keep my boots on Mark 1),I take every opportunity to teach young girls to shoot and in every case once they get over being startled by the bang they shoot well. The female of the species is deadlier than the male (most girls just don't realize they might have the ability). One thing, the girls take you seriously when you lay the word down on things like safety and are less likely to engage in hazardous horseplay on the range. It is likely a testosterone/masculine ego thing perhaps but I have heard that the morphology of female brains has greater bilateral symmetry than male brains, enhancing balance and other factors. Men have their own advantages, I would never want to play into the old men vs. women, who's better argument after all, Vive la difference! It does suggest that if one is expecting hostiles aboard and one has an axe and a gun, give the man the axe and the gun to the woman for best odds of engagement.
Sheesh! Things getting rough on this blog. I'm intimidated.
BTW Bella, Women use the left side of the brain, Guys use the the right side.
That's right, We guys use the right side. :-)
The Ruger M-77 tang safety was discontinued around 1988 with the introduction f the M-77 Mark II in 1989. Production of the M-77 started in 1968.
davidpetzel,
Your comments of a day or so ago regarding the late Seely Masker, custom riflesmith of benchrest fame, brings back memories. The first time I spoke to him by telephone at his Getzville, NY address he snarled that he didn't make rifles for hunters, they were bad for his reputation. Finally, a couple mutual friends talked him into it. When the rifle. a 300 Win Mag arrived, it was so homely I was somewhat disappointed, but this turned out to be a tremendous advantage. Whenever I shot a great group at the range, or a made a super hit on big game, I got all the credit. No one dreamed a rifle that looked like it did could be that accurate.
I fully agree about female shooters! Since things have been going south in my town regarding crime I took the little lady to an indoor range and asked her if she would like to learn how to shoot a pistol, I took along 3 a Walther PP .32,Smith & Wesson 686 Plus, and a 1911A1, I showed her how to hold and get a good sight picture, and danged if she did not put all her rounds in the black @ 20 Yards with all three. I will try never to get her mad again!
Post a Comment
I is a woman with calluses (and I'll keep my boots on Mark 1),I take every opportunity to teach young girls to shoot and in every case once they get over being startled by the bang they shoot well. The female of the species is deadlier than the male (most girls just don't realize they might have the ability). One thing, the girls take you seriously when you lay the word down on things like safety and are less likely to engage in hazardous horseplay on the range. It is likely a testosterone/masculine ego thing perhaps but I have heard that the morphology of female brains has greater bilateral symmetry than male brains, enhancing balance and other factors. Men have their own advantages, I would never want to play into the old men vs. women, who's better argument after all, Vive la difference! It does suggest that if one is expecting hostiles aboard and one has an axe and a gun, give the man the axe and the gun to the woman for best odds of engagement.
Regarding women and shooting: I observe that most young (and not-so-young) novice male shooters approach the firing line with the presupposition that proficiency with firearms is provided by the "Y" chromosome. As a coach and instructor, it was annoying to see a "know it all" attitude in a lad who obviously did not know it all, didn't hold or handle a sidearm properly, and couldn't hit a bull in the derriere with a bass fiddle if he were standing next to the creature.
On the occasions I coached Women Marines, they were generally receptive to instruction, attentive to detail and noticeably more consistent. I chalked the difference up to male ego and hubris.
My wife and daughter have been familiarized with firearms, and they've done remarkably well; however, despite what appears to be an innate talent, neither is inclined to adopt shooting as a recreational outlet. My son has been shooting with me for some time and will go active in the U.S. Navy in a few weeks. He has done a fine job on the range and he's a good shooter. I've enjoyed our time on the range.
Years ago, a young lady was on the pistol line at the South Coast Gun Club in Irvine, CA. She was very competent, very accurate. During a target break, she asked,
"Did you teach pistol at MCAS El Toro in 1968?" That was more than a dozen years in the past, but I nodded, "Yes, I did." She smiled and answered, "You were my coach. I remember you! Thank you. I'm a deputy with the Orange County Sheriff Department now." I smiled and commented, "You've obviously learned well; I've watched your targets and your shooting surpasses me. Well done!" I had considerable respect for the OCSD and thanked her for taking a challenging job with a good department.
I remember shooting M&P Matches at the San Diego Police Range when I was 21, and the pistol line was dominated by salty, paunchy old devils who had done through truckloads of brass in their shooting careers. They sized up the competition and completely overlooked a young woman, an Air Force lieutenant weighing no more than 105 lbs. When the last round had been been fired and the scores were posted on the Wailing Wall, that young woman took 1st Place...and deserved it.
Shooting can be a great lesson in humility. These are rifles and pistols, not broadswords. Do not assume that upper body strength is an advantage. It doesn't take a 17-inch bicep to shoot well. And if your coach is a woman, listen attentively and respectfully, be thankful for the guidance, and shoot with your sidearm, not your mouth.
To All, regarding the .650 MOA barrel I scrapped. Back in the mid 80s, I visited a gunmaker named Seeley Masker who lived just down the road from me. Seeley built benchrest rifles. I asked him if he would make me a 2.2/250 that would keep five shots in half an inch. His eyes rolled back in his head and foam collected on his lips. I thought he was having a stroke. "HALF INCH?" he bellowed. "MY RIFLES PUT FIVE SHOTS THROUGH THE SAME HOLE."
After he calmed down we agreed he would build the gun, and it did put five shots in .300 and a bit, and he also built a .220 Swift that would group into a quarter inch.
The point to all this is that you can get sub-half-minute rifles from a number of people, and that extreme accuracy is the point of the exercise, so once it's gone, you need a new barrel. Thank you for listening.
Dave,
Having spent a good portion of my Army career training soldiers to shoot I have no doubt you are correct about women shooters.
The one and only rifle I've seen the barrel shot out was a custom 264 Mag varmint outfit.
Women indeed seem to be better rifle and wing shots and, seem to be better horse riders. Worse, I think some comic said women have half the money and all the pu**y.
All the more reason for guys to keep these Battle Queens barefoot and in line. :-)
I shot an old m98 rebarreled in 1947 to 3006 when i was in the youth division of the homeguard. this was oh well 16 years ago and the barrel by then had had some where in bewteen 50-75000 rounds through it.. inside the barrel looked so ragged that the bullet would need a map and compass to find its way out.. but still it shot such close groups that i could nail a skeet as a target if i did my job right at 200 yards.. (this was back when my eyesight was better and it was with original open sights and military stock) so i hunted with it and thought it pretty accurate..
and im afraid i have to admit that my 60 year old mom outshoots me with a pellet gun every time:(
(but not with anything that actually goes bang cos she then closes her eyes and turn her head away:P )
Just hope i get to teach my daughter be4 boy fever sets on:P
A couple years ago my wife made a 120 yard shot on a hog that I couldn't find the bullet wound on. I looked and looked in all the usual places.... then I saw it..... right between the eyes. I glanced back at her and she had a wry grin on her face.
Do NOT mess with that woman.
I wonder if the difference between boys and girls shooting is more physical or mental?
As was mentioned above, the boys bragging about how well they will do, the girls not.
Could it simply be that the guys have in their heads that they are naturally good shots because they are guys and don't need to learn anything new because they already "know" how to do it?
Whereas the girls have no pre-concieved notions and pay more attention to instructions and what they are doing at the firing line?
Dave, I'm all for accuracy but you've mentioned before how we are unnecessarily "sub-moa crazy" these days. I think you must be "king of the ward" -- if there is such a thing.
When my sister lived alone due to her husband's military commitments, my Dad bought her a sweet little S&W revolver -- something akin to the Model 36 but chambered in .32 long. When she was taken out to learn to shoot it, she was gangling and awkward; had to hold her hand over one eye to aim -- but proceeded to drill each can from about 10 yards! After each shot the can would fly but she would still ask, "did I hit it?"
That should, by the way, be .22/250.
Dave Petzal, I know you don't need anyone to give you "+'s" or "-'s" since you are already a 5 star general on the F&S website but I gave you a "+" anyway just for being polite.
The Ruger M-77 tang safety was discontinued around 1988 with the introduction f the M-77 Mark II in 1989. Production of the M-77 started in 1968.
davidpetzel,
Your comments of a day or so ago regarding the late Seely Masker, custom riflesmith of benchrest fame, brings back memories. The first time I spoke to him by telephone at his Getzville, NY address he snarled that he didn't make rifles for hunters, they were bad for his reputation. Finally, a couple mutual friends talked him into it. When the rifle. a 300 Win Mag arrived, it was so homely I was somewhat disappointed, but this turned out to be a tremendous advantage. Whenever I shot a great group at the range, or a made a super hit on big game, I got all the credit. No one dreamed a rifle that looked like it did could be that accurate.
I lose sleep about my rem 722 257 roberts barrel. I know one day it won't shoot like it does now, which is one ragged clover leaf at 100 with federal 120 tp partitions. This rifle is in it's factory wood stock, no glass, no pillars, and the only thing on it that is not factory is the tuned up 3 lb trigger, like glass...
I don't have the heart to rebarrel this old work horse. With all my other rifles I would never hesitate to rebarrel one, most of them are semi customs with aftermarket barrels anyway, that's part of the joy of living in the future- now that it's the year 2000 and we all have jet cars- wait, nevermind, not so... BUT there are smiths everywhere that can spin on great barrels and get you amazing accuracy for a great price. Nothing better than being a rifle freak in todays world. SUB MOA rifles for less than 500 bucks from the factory. Keep those crowns protected and keep em clean!
I still remember being 12 years old and taking gun safety training here in MN. All of the guy bragging and waiting for the last day when we shot targets. Jackie Graner schooled us all.
Dave, if my 39-year-old .22/250 still shot five-shot groups in .650" I wouldn't touch it, let alone get it rebarreled! You certainly are demanding in accuracy expectations.
I thoroughly enjoyed your recent F & S article on "no B.S. accuracy", including your usual dry wit.
My girlfriend shot for the 1st ever several months ago. 25 yards. She was using my Ruger Mark III Hunter. 22LR. She drilled the target time after time that day. From both the sitting and standing positions. She is signed up for an all day Ladies Day at the Range in a few weeks. Her accuracy was amazing. I am very proud of her. We go to the range together alot now. She said it was important for her to know how to handle a gun and feel comfortable around them. I could not be happier.
It's a scientific "fact" that the lady's have better hand/eye skills than men.
As for the .22-250, with groups like that you want to change barrels? WHY ?
I've been shooting relatively seriously since I was about 8 or 10 years old (I'm now 30). I've won a few matches here and there, and while I'm not world class, I'm a pretty good shot. My wife has been shooting sporadically for about 7 years - that is to say a little less than the time that has elapsed since we met, and she usually only shoots a few times a year. On on of her good-shooting days, she is only a marginally poorer shot than me - leading me to the conclusion that if she shot as regularly and seriously as I, there would be no contest.
I remember as a kid begging my mom to join in on our 22lr and pellet rifle shooting competitions while out camping, after being out shot by her on multiple occasions I quit asking her to join in. She could go years with out pulling a trigger, then pick up whatever gun and out shoot us all....
Good GOD Dave; change a barrel shooting under an inch at a 100yds!? You, Sir, have high standards for your rifles!
I believe the female sex, on average, does shoot better then men.I saw this many-a-time in the military/range qalfy shoots. Oh, speaking of women at the shooting range@ while shooting my X16 for qualification to Police training I happen to be assigned a "girl" range officer....that chewed tobacco,raw cut,that is, which unfortunately during one of her "spits" found the forearm of my rifle. A big honkin brown gob it.
Now, this was not pleasant memory, but I thought you all wouldn't mind a little military humor to chew on...
175rltw
I had a 722 that shot extremely well, but was sold to help finance an elk hunt. Duh.
My current Ruger M-77 and Winchester M-70 .257's shoot Federal 120 gr partitions very well and 100 gr Hornady handloads. My Savage 110, one of the few factory barreled in .257 Roberts, did not shoot the Federal 120 gr partitions particularly well, but shot 100 gr Ballistic Tips into ragged hole groups.
Still looking for another 722.......
Mark-1
He was no comic....
When its time to rebarrel you might as well give it up and have another tube put on the action. I had a rifle built about three years ago so chambered that when they were told my load, Douglas Barrels said the barrel might go 500-600 rounds. I have been somewhat careful with the shooting and am at 400 shots. So far so good as the interior of the barrel still looks fine but then maybe it will all go at once. Until then I will continue to enjoy it but maybe next time choose another chambering.
If you look back at some of my postings you will note that for decades I have claimed that especially females who have received no previous firearms training seem to advance at least as quick and usually become more proficient than their male counterparts. This is not always the case but often is true. What is discourageing is that time in the life of a fine you lady when she starts wearing bras and makeup which means they are thinking about boys. At that point often shooting is not so important although it very well may return sometime in their twenties. Just my casual observations.
in the above post it should read "fine young lady" not "fine you lady", damned old funbling fingers in too big a rush
I agree w/you Dave. My wife and daughter both shoot excellent. Yes, you do have some very demanding criteria for accuracy.
I've noticed that women with minimal or no shooting exposure make good students and often outshoot men.
Maybe it's because they didn't play cowboys and indians or cops and robbers. Or more to the point, because they have no pre-conceived ideas on how to do it.
This after 28 years as an Air Force instructor.
(I will say however, they do get a slack-jawed grin after automatic fire !)
Dave; and all; I think most are missing the point altogether. The stated fact is that the group size has approximately doubled. I agree completely, time to rebarrel. This is no place for sentiment, that old barrel has been a good one, but she's gone. I've shot out 2 barrels on .22/250s, and 1 more that had started to go, when another fellow thought he could use it to advantage, because it would still group .500 to 675 consistently, and offered me nearly twice what I paid for it. I sold it to him, and never lost a minute of sleep over the sale.
As I read recently, there are a dozen companies making barrels for a living as I type this, why deprive of them of their livelihood?
Hers David’s proof!
Back in may of 85, had the Colonels teenage Daughter Sandra Worman wanted to shoot High Power. MSgt Mike Woodruff and I started and kept her in small bore. In June 86 she was at the Whittington Center for the Olympic try outs.
Dave what happens to those old barrels? Could yours be rebored in say 250 Savage and would it shoot as well it did as a 22-250?
You are right about the ladies. My daughter became a better shot than her brothers after a minimum amount of time and effort.
Since I've never shot the barrel out of one of my guns, I'll restrict my comment to women. My wife's a pro golfer and as I watch her and other women golfers, there's a marked difference in the deliberation and mechanics of their swing/game, versus men. They stay truer in technique. My 3 daughters all shoot pistol with me and they seem to be naturals. They don't care about exactly how well they do, they just do well. They do listen and put teaching into play. My boys at best, partially do. When my wife had her first opportunity to shoot pistol, darn it all if the only handgun I had with me was my Super Redhawk, 44 mag. So her first exposure was that, and she put a fist-sized group together from 25 yards! Her only naive comment was "are these things all this loud?"
I think women are more patient, "really" willing to learn, and not so bravado-oriented as many of us guys.
Thanks!
Loved this comment, Dave, and have shared some of the same observations about females and gunpowder. Having taught riflery at some Summer Christian Camps, I would traditionally have a shoot off on Fridays. The boys would not even come close to winning that match. On the other hand, the girls seemed nonchalant about their scores, like 'anybody can do it.'
My Mom confiscated Dad's 722 in .222...she enjoyed shooting jackrabbits out in the boonies in West Texas, while Dad and I enjoyed prairie dog town shooting with it. It still places them in the 10 ring, and now I am on the watch for any caliber 722.
Nice blog.
Blue
All:
Last week I took my daughter's Browning A-Bolt in 22-250 to the gunsmith for a new barrel. I bought the rifle several years ago, used but in excellent shape, and with it came several targets with smaller than 1/2" groups in them (at 100 yards) as proof of accuracy. The rifle has Browning's BOSS ("Ballistic Optimized Shooting System," or something like that) installed on it, which is nothing more than a muzzle brake on the end of the barrel you can rotate and adjust to minimize or eliminate barrel vibrations so as to obtain tighter groups.
(As an aside, the BOSS system works in a healthy barrel; I've gotten groups of around .318" or so on many occasions with that rifle. The system also reduces the 22-250's recoil to that of a .22 rimfire. On the other hand, the BOSS system is nuclear-blast level loud, and it produces tremendous muzzle blast, too, thus pretty much eliminating prone position shots from the ground unless you like a tornado blast of dirt and dust and grit and grass in your face every time you shoot. Double ear protection is vital, and eye protection, too.)
I'm replacing the barrel on the A-Bolt because the rifle will not consistently shoot groups under 1" anymore, but also, and equally importantly (at least to me), the rifle can no longer handle handloads which used to shoot perfectly fine in it, perfectly normal handloads straight out of Nosler's reloading manuals. The bolt now gets stiff after a round is fired and I've blown several primers on loads that once fired and emptied without the slightest problem whatsoever. (I theorize this development is due to throat and chamber erosion, and even though I have scrubbed the barrel with everything and anything several gunshops have been eager to sell me, the problem only gets worse as more rounds are put through the barrel.) Also, and not only with the handloads but also with Remington or Winchester factory rounds that I've chronographed many times, the muzzle velocity of the rifle has dropped 150-200 fps per round on average. (Why this is so, I'm still puzzling over.) So, no more procrastination. New barrel time. (I've ordered a Douglas premium air-gauged barrel, 24".)
In terms of women being better natural shots than men, I concur completely. Although my 14-year old daughter is far more interested in social activities with her pals these days than she is in going to the range (or, sadly, out into the wilds), a couple of weeks ago I managed to get her, a friend of hers, the friend's (beautiful) mom and myself out to the range for a day of shooting. I barely outshot my daughter and her friend. (I practice a lot and my daughter rarely practices at all; her friend had only shot a rifle half a dozen times before in her whole life.) As I was getting into position to take a 300-yard shot at a small water-filled plastic jug with my daughter's .257 Roberts (using handloads, of course), I heard my daughter quietly snicker, whisper, and half-apologize to her friend--I'm not totally deaf yet, though my daughter thinks so--the following: (a)"Don't hold your breath waiting for my dad to take his shot; it takes him forever and a day to get into position and pull the goddam*ed trigger"; and (b) "He's getting old and can't see like he used to. He's probably going to miss the bottle. We're gonna kick his ass out here, you'll see." (Oh, the impertinence and insolence of youth!) I beat them, but not by much. With a little practice, they could outshoot me without much effort at all.
I've taught every woman in my office (past and present) how to shoot pistols and rifles. All of the ladies (but for one who has a tendency to close her eyes just before pulling the trigger) are natural born excellent shooters. I had to work hard to outperform them. I would certainly never want to be downrange of any of them if they were really, really angry.
TWD
Holy half minute of angle Batman, re-barrel a rifle that shoots .650" @ 100 yards? First of all I would never be able to come to the realization that my rifle had changed from .365" to .650" because let's face it most rifles are more accurate than the owner.
Secondly women are pretty much better than men at any endeavor that does not require brute strength or tearing things up or a desire for a near death experience... They are more meticulous and have smaller fingers and better control and their sense of touch is enhanced by delicate skin with no callouses.
My oldest .22-250, a Rem 700BDL "Varmint" purchased in early 1975 (I'm using it in my profile photo) has digested more than 4,400 rounds, 98% of them are handloads that deliver a bit over 3400 fps when they were last chronographed. The rifle is a bit past its prime - I can certainly identify with that - but it's still a varmint-destroyer! I'd say it's a candidate for a Hart, Pac-Nor or Shilen barrel, but I still wouldn't hesitate to take it afield for another coyote trip.
That is why I am thankful why many women don't hunt... imagine if they did... men would have nothing to shoot at. lol
Women, perhaps, may be better intrinsic shots than men, on average. But I tend to believe that men make better use of weapons overall.
Skill does not matter if the intent is lacking.
Time for me to rebarrel an old workhorse. My old M-77 7mm Mag is getting to be a 2 inch rifle. When I got it (used from a pawnshop) in 1993 it shot the group of my life (1 15/16 inch at 300)on the day I discovered that it LOVED the 140 gr partition load from Federal. sub-moa groups were easy. A roof leak that saturated the gun case for months before being found in 2000 rusted the bore terribly. Groups immediately went to 1 1/2 inches and have gone steadily downhill since. Question for Dave: When was the M-77 made with a sliding tang safety akin to the Mossberg 500?
I hate to change up the gun as most of my whitetail shots are 15-80 yds with the occasional 200 yarder on a powerline R.O.W but I love busting the occasional coyote at 400 in my hayfield in summer
I have this women being good shots thing figured out. Many years ago I took my wife on her first trip ever to the range and let her fire my Ruger 10/22; her first time shooting a firearm. And she promptly shot the bullseye out of the target. She also did OK with a .30 cal carbine that same day; I wouldn't have wanted her shooting at me. The secret? She knew nothing about guns or how they work, ballistics, this ammo versus that ammo, any of that stuff, nor did she care. She just took the rifle and did what I told her to do.
By BamaHunter "A roof leak that saturated the gun case for months before being found in 2000 rusted the bore terribly."
You leave your guns cased for months on end? Or are you talking gun cabinet?
I left a shotgun cased for a week once and was shocked to see the nice blued barrel had turned to mostly reddish rust, luckily it was light and a good aggressive oil rubdown got it almost back to it's pre cased look. All guns come out of cases as soon as I'm home now.
Sheesh! Things getting rough on this blog. I'm intimidated.
BTW Bella, Women use the left side of the brain, Guys use the the right side.
That's right, We guys use the right side. :-)
I can't imagine how many rifles have been sold with coyotes, prairie dogs, marmots, and other varmints as the targets of choice. They've provided the incentive for many of my purchases!
I fully agree about female shooters! Since things have been going south in my town regarding crime I took the little lady to an indoor range and asked her if she would like to learn how to shoot a pistol, I took along 3 a Walther PP .32,Smith & Wesson 686 Plus, and a 1911A1, I showed her how to hold and get a good sight picture, and danged if she did not put all her rounds in the black @ 20 Yards with all three. I will try never to get her mad again!
Post a Comment