Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Bourjaily: "Bo Whoop" Sells

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

March 16, 2010

Bourjaily: "Bo Whoop" Sells

By Philip Bourjaily

In January we reported that author Nash Buckingham’s famous missing Super Fox shotgun, “Bo Whoop” had not only been found and authenticated, but it was scheduled to be sold at auction.

James D. Julia Auctions of Fairfield, Maine, sold Bo Whoop yesterday, March 15, for $175,000.* When I posted this story originally, a number of you wondered why the gun wasn’t returned to Buckingham’s estate when it surfaced. Here’s the story: as I mentioned previously, Nash lost Bo Whoop by leaning it against the fender of his hunting partner’s car while a game warden checked their licenses. Buckingham and friend forgot about the gun and drove off. When they realized what they had done they went back, but Bo Whoop was gone. Despite thorough searches by police and sportsmen, no one found it or responded to the ads Buckingham placed in the paper.

That was 1948. Jump ahead to the late 50s/early 60s when an unknown man offered the eventual seller’s grandfather a shotgun with a broken stock for $100. The grandfather haggled and bought the gun for fifty bucks. Despite the words “Made for Nash Buckingham” engraved on the top of the right barrel where it’s impossible to miss, Grandpa stuck the gun in his closet, where it remained for thirty years until he died in 1991. His son put in it in storage, then, in 2005 decided to have the broken stock repaired (there is no record of whether the stock broke falling off the car back in ’48 or later). The son wanted the job done right, so he took it to Jim Kelly at Darlington Gun Works in South Carolina. Kelly saw the inscription, realized this was Bo Whoop and told the owner what he had.

Kelly fixed the stock. The owner put the gun back into storage. Recently, Bo Whoop passed to the man’s son, who made the hard decision to sell the gun to pay medical expenses. And so, Bo Whoop wound up at Julia’s. I don’t know if the buyer is a collector or a gun dealer but either way, I doubt the new owner sticks it in the closet and forgets about it.

* It had been predicted to bring between $100,000 and $200,000, although some thought it might fetch more than Czar Nicholas’ Parker, which sold for $287,000 a few years ago. Both amounts are chump change compared to the world record auction price for an antique duck decoy: $856,000 in 2007 for a Red Breasted Merganser by Lothrop Holmes. Me, I’d rather have a gun than a decoy. Go figure.

Comments (38)

Top Rated
All Comments
from jscottevans wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I would like to be able to afford either of the guns or the decoy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

This shotgun's history compares to the Hope Diamond's story. Cool!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Amflyer wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Sometimes it seems we know the price of everything and the value of nothing.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from TJ wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

You could give me any of them and I wouldn't complain. The questionis do youshoot it at least once?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from NolanOsborne wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

If you had the money to buy it, you should shoot it as well.
The gun was made to hunt with imo, and you should use it. Granted you arent going to take it goose hunting in rain and sleet when its -10 C out, but I think that I would use it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RANGERMANZ20 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

wish they had more pics of the gun

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I have to ask if the Buckingham's estate/inheritor is not legally the owner? Or is it an issue of being lost and a statute of limitations running up? It just seems that if my late ancestor lost something like that and it turned up, I'd be looking at whether or not I am entitled to have it back in the family.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Ah, the "unknown man". Very convenient! I think there is more to the story here that Grandpa took to the grave with him. Sounds like a man who knew what he had. Probably never met a neighbor's chicken he didn't like either.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I tend to agree with horseman308 and duckcreekdick. Seems to be some shellgame with the actual ownership. I'll bet it gets "discovered" now.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Too weird...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

$175,000... I bet old Nash is sitting on a porch in the great reward with Grits Greshham and Bob Ruark shaking their heads...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from tygh98 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

As long as grandpa's purchase was in good faith, Buckingham's estate is out of luck.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Its a crying shame but maybe the new owner will give them a chance to buy it if they wish to.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

How could you possibly forget about a firearm this nice and leave it leaning against a car????? Sounds to me that Bo Whoop knew it wasn't appreciated and ran away!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jakenbake wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

finders keepers...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

the old childhood "finders keepers" rule of thumb applies here. if mr. buckingham had come back while i was still there, and explained what had happened, i would have certainly been more than happy to give it back. but, on the other hand, with the inscription right on the barrel, i also would have contacted local police and or game warden and reported it, and held out for a modest "finders fee". lets face it, if the man has enough money to have a gun specially made for him, he can afford a finders fee. i also would have told him face to face, that if i ever came across his gun again, he would not get it back. obviously, i have no idea who nash buckingham was. if i came across a gun with the inscription " made for david e. petzal, i would know who it belonged to, and i would know where to contact him. but he had better bring some cash! LOLOL!!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Dave...
The essential news may not be that 'Bo Whoop' sold, or even that it was found. The really important thing may be that this special work of art did what it was designed to do, plus at least one thing more...it pleased its owner, mightily, and then---it made its reputation around the duckblinds, announcing its presence and getting its nickname. Even though it was lost, it had given exactly what it was supposed to render, plus a lot more, to its true owner. An opportunist may have hidden it away, but the memories were sacred, and special to the one for whom it was important. The first owner was proud of it...the second was ashamed.

Our special guns often have nicknames, because they live in our hearts more than in the gun cabinet. Personally, I would feel that keeping a man's beloved shotgun is like stealing from his children.

Blue

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Phil...my bad...called you Dave. You have been called worse, surely. I know, I know..don't call me shirley, either.

Blue

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Read some of Buckingham's stories and you realize he used Bo Whoop (and Bo Whoop II) on many duck hunts in snow, sleet, rain and other inclement weather; it is what the old gun was made for. Sportsmen of those days knew how to take care of their guns when they returned from the blind. If I had Bo Whoop, it would damn sure go duck hunting again. I have a Fox made in 1906 that will still fold a mallard like it probably did a hundred years ago. Every time I take the old gun out, I wonder what stories it could tell. I will go out on a limb and say whoever the mystery man was that originally found Bo Whoop knew damn well what he had and who it belonged to. So did the guy that bought it for $50.00.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I forgot to mention, for what it's worth, Buckingham did receive a settlment for the gun from his insurance company. And, of course, he had a second Super Fox (Bo Whoop II) made to replace the first.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

FWIW, the gun no longer belonged to Nash once he received a settlement for its loss. It then belonged to the insurance company and I'll bet the statute of limitations on lost, not stolen, property ran out in way less than 7 years.

If you snooze, you lose.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

What a bunch of jail house lawyers!!!

If there was any way Nash's Estate and the Insurance Co was able to get their hands on that gun, they'd already have it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fortyfive70 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

My first shotgun was stephens model 311, 26" barrel with ic/mod chokes...worked all summer long cutting grass to buy that gun...that was back in the late 60's...Gun was stolen out of my car, it really sickened me to know that someone else was hunting with that shotgun. but they couldn't steal the memories i had with that gun..
I am sure it was the same way for Nash, and the person who now has ownership of that gun (bo whoop) can't really enjoy it. even though he paid for the gun it really will never be his.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Even for this blog, $175,000 sounds like a lot of money for a shotgun you are going to shoot. You could buy a pile of Benellis and a Perazzi or two, the truck to drive them in, and the garage to park the truck in, for that much. On the other hand, $175,000 is not too much to pay for art. A Picasso painting recently sold for $104 million dollars.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3682127.stm

I like the shotgun a lot better than that painting!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hi_tail wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

TO TJ-
I see why you wouldn't want to shoot it. I personally enjoy and drool over using finely crafted esoteric things. It wasn't made for a lampstand and if you have the $$ to make it yours, I say get your enjoyment out of it, letting it do what it does best, and let the grin grow!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Mark-1

EXACTLY! +1

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from waldman79 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I hope the new owner hunts ducks with it at least once, just to say they did

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I live in the Mississippi flyway and I can tell you that having worked at duck clubs (catering to the elite and plucking ducks for 15cents each in 1963)
duck decoys from the past do sell for ridiculous prices. Twenty Five years ago (I was 34 then) an acquaintances' family in Portage Des Sioux, Mo., sold a couple dozen or more hand carved decoys for a little over $300,000. We thought it outrageous and lucky for them but apparently the great grandfather who bought them had good taste.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

fortyfive70,
My first shotgun was a Stevens 20ga single shot break down (don't remember the model#). But my second and most accurate shotgun was a Stevens 311, 12ga, I loved it. Both barrels were accidentally regulated perfectly. It was stolen too just like yours. The second one I bought was a piece of garbage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It could be that with the publication of this story, the Salvage Department of some insurance company will be getting in touch with the new owner. He in turn may be getting in touch with the auction gallery, and there will be another chapter in this story with Bo Whoop changing hands a few more times.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mactrager wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Phil, I find myself in a state of flux. I have been in the field hunting with my father and grandfather since I was 8 years old. I started with a .410 at the 7 station and worked my way out to shoot with a 28 gauge 1100 and then a LT100 in 20 gauge. I hunted in Mexico last year with a 20 gauge lighting for quail lead me to take a Silver Pigeon 12 Gauge to Arkansas for ducks. Know I am looking to go back to a double for all my hunting and can't keep thinking that with all of they new technology that I can go back to a 20 Gauge for everything. What do you all think, a Double 20 Gauge for Dove, Quail, Pheasant and Ducks. Thanks for all the help.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Mactrager --- If you are willing to pay for premium non-toxic ammunition, a 20 gauge could certainly serve as one gun for everything. HeviShot, HD and Xtended Range in a 20 gauge is easily the equal of a 12 loaded with steel.
I started shooting a 20 gauge with Federal Heavyweights for turkeys last spring and was very impressed with its effectiveness even at "12 gauge" ranges.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Getting back to the topic at hand, the finder of property acquires no rights in mislaid property, is entitled to possession of lost property against everyone except the true owner, but is entitled to keep abandoned property, which is defined as property found in a place where the true owner intended to leave it with no intention of returning to claim it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from springerman3 wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

Mactrager,
I hunt almost everything with a s/s 20 gauge ( not a duck hunter )and it hads plenty of kill power. You are limited in range a little but those who want more range are usually not capable to consistantly make kills at long range. ( past 40 yards )
Practice and become proficient with this gun out to 35 yards and you will have many enjoyable hunts !!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WinthropWyman wrote 1 year 16 weeks ago

Everything's always cheaper at amazon. A lot of times video games (brand new one's especially) will be between $1-$10 off. Older one's will be cheaper.
dj toronto

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Seslialemci wrote 1 year 15 weeks ago

As long as grandpa's purchase was in good faith, Buckingham's estate is out of luck. Sesli chat
Sesli sohbet

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MilburnNeville wrote 1 year 14 weeks ago

I do not expect the Copenhagen meeting to end in a clear agreement yet, but I do expect some progress to be made and that world leaders will take this very seriously.
polythene bags

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOEYBRYSON wrote 1 year 14 weeks ago

One has to leave soon from this world ( at the time of death) and at that time our TED knowledge will not count. It would only matter how much detachment we .practiced. How much my consciousness is purified.
Corporate Branding | Corporate Gifts | Business Gifts

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Amflyer wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Sometimes it seems we know the price of everything and the value of nothing.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from tygh98 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

As long as grandpa's purchase was in good faith, Buckingham's estate is out of luck.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hi_tail wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

TO TJ-
I see why you wouldn't want to shoot it. I personally enjoy and drool over using finely crafted esoteric things. It wasn't made for a lampstand and if you have the $$ to make it yours, I say get your enjoyment out of it, letting it do what it does best, and let the grin grow!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jscottevans wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I would like to be able to afford either of the guns or the decoy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

This shotgun's history compares to the Hope Diamond's story. Cool!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from TJ wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

You could give me any of them and I wouldn't complain. The questionis do youshoot it at least once?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from NolanOsborne wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

If you had the money to buy it, you should shoot it as well.
The gun was made to hunt with imo, and you should use it. Granted you arent going to take it goose hunting in rain and sleet when its -10 C out, but I think that I would use it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from RANGERMANZ20 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

wish they had more pics of the gun

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from horseman308 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I have to ask if the Buckingham's estate/inheritor is not legally the owner? Or is it an issue of being lost and a statute of limitations running up? It just seems that if my late ancestor lost something like that and it turned up, I'd be looking at whether or not I am entitled to have it back in the family.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Ah, the "unknown man". Very convenient! I think there is more to the story here that Grandpa took to the grave with him. Sounds like a man who knew what he had. Probably never met a neighbor's chicken he didn't like either.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I tend to agree with horseman308 and duckcreekdick. Seems to be some shellgame with the actual ownership. I'll bet it gets "discovered" now.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Too weird...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

$175,000... I bet old Nash is sitting on a porch in the great reward with Grits Greshham and Bob Ruark shaking their heads...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

How could you possibly forget about a firearm this nice and leave it leaning against a car????? Sounds to me that Bo Whoop knew it wasn't appreciated and ran away!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

the old childhood "finders keepers" rule of thumb applies here. if mr. buckingham had come back while i was still there, and explained what had happened, i would have certainly been more than happy to give it back. but, on the other hand, with the inscription right on the barrel, i also would have contacted local police and or game warden and reported it, and held out for a modest "finders fee". lets face it, if the man has enough money to have a gun specially made for him, he can afford a finders fee. i also would have told him face to face, that if i ever came across his gun again, he would not get it back. obviously, i have no idea who nash buckingham was. if i came across a gun with the inscription " made for david e. petzal, i would know who it belonged to, and i would know where to contact him. but he had better bring some cash! LOLOL!!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Dave...
The essential news may not be that 'Bo Whoop' sold, or even that it was found. The really important thing may be that this special work of art did what it was designed to do, plus at least one thing more...it pleased its owner, mightily, and then---it made its reputation around the duckblinds, announcing its presence and getting its nickname. Even though it was lost, it had given exactly what it was supposed to render, plus a lot more, to its true owner. An opportunist may have hidden it away, but the memories were sacred, and special to the one for whom it was important. The first owner was proud of it...the second was ashamed.

Our special guns often have nicknames, because they live in our hearts more than in the gun cabinet. Personally, I would feel that keeping a man's beloved shotgun is like stealing from his children.

Blue

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Read some of Buckingham's stories and you realize he used Bo Whoop (and Bo Whoop II) on many duck hunts in snow, sleet, rain and other inclement weather; it is what the old gun was made for. Sportsmen of those days knew how to take care of their guns when they returned from the blind. If I had Bo Whoop, it would damn sure go duck hunting again. I have a Fox made in 1906 that will still fold a mallard like it probably did a hundred years ago. Every time I take the old gun out, I wonder what stories it could tell. I will go out on a limb and say whoever the mystery man was that originally found Bo Whoop knew damn well what he had and who it belonged to. So did the guy that bought it for $50.00.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I forgot to mention, for what it's worth, Buckingham did receive a settlment for the gun from his insurance company. And, of course, he had a second Super Fox (Bo Whoop II) made to replace the first.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

FWIW, the gun no longer belonged to Nash once he received a settlement for its loss. It then belonged to the insurance company and I'll bet the statute of limitations on lost, not stolen, property ran out in way less than 7 years.

If you snooze, you lose.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

What a bunch of jail house lawyers!!!

If there was any way Nash's Estate and the Insurance Co was able to get their hands on that gun, they'd already have it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fortyfive70 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

My first shotgun was stephens model 311, 26" barrel with ic/mod chokes...worked all summer long cutting grass to buy that gun...that was back in the late 60's...Gun was stolen out of my car, it really sickened me to know that someone else was hunting with that shotgun. but they couldn't steal the memories i had with that gun..
I am sure it was the same way for Nash, and the person who now has ownership of that gun (bo whoop) can't really enjoy it. even though he paid for the gun it really will never be his.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Its a crying shame but maybe the new owner will give them a chance to buy it if they wish to.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jakenbake wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

finders keepers...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Phil...my bad...called you Dave. You have been called worse, surely. I know, I know..don't call me shirley, either.

Blue

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Even for this blog, $175,000 sounds like a lot of money for a shotgun you are going to shoot. You could buy a pile of Benellis and a Perazzi or two, the truck to drive them in, and the garage to park the truck in, for that much. On the other hand, $175,000 is not too much to pay for art. A Picasso painting recently sold for $104 million dollars.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3682127.stm

I like the shotgun a lot better than that painting!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I live in the Mississippi flyway and I can tell you that having worked at duck clubs (catering to the elite and plucking ducks for 15cents each in 1963)
duck decoys from the past do sell for ridiculous prices. Twenty Five years ago (I was 34 then) an acquaintances' family in Portage Des Sioux, Mo., sold a couple dozen or more hand carved decoys for a little over $300,000. We thought it outrageous and lucky for them but apparently the great grandfather who bought them had good taste.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Mark-1

EXACTLY! +1

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from waldman79 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I hope the new owner hunts ducks with it at least once, just to say they did

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

fortyfive70,
My first shotgun was a Stevens 20ga single shot break down (don't remember the model#). But my second and most accurate shotgun was a Stevens 311, 12ga, I loved it. Both barrels were accidentally regulated perfectly. It was stolen too just like yours. The second one I bought was a piece of garbage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

It could be that with the publication of this story, the Salvage Department of some insurance company will be getting in touch with the new owner. He in turn may be getting in touch with the auction gallery, and there will be another chapter in this story with Bo Whoop changing hands a few more times.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mactrager wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Phil, I find myself in a state of flux. I have been in the field hunting with my father and grandfather since I was 8 years old. I started with a .410 at the 7 station and worked my way out to shoot with a 28 gauge 1100 and then a LT100 in 20 gauge. I hunted in Mexico last year with a 20 gauge lighting for quail lead me to take a Silver Pigeon 12 Gauge to Arkansas for ducks. Know I am looking to go back to a double for all my hunting and can't keep thinking that with all of they new technology that I can go back to a 20 Gauge for everything. What do you all think, a Double 20 Gauge for Dove, Quail, Pheasant and Ducks. Thanks for all the help.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Mactrager --- If you are willing to pay for premium non-toxic ammunition, a 20 gauge could certainly serve as one gun for everything. HeviShot, HD and Xtended Range in a 20 gauge is easily the equal of a 12 loaded with steel.
I started shooting a 20 gauge with Federal Heavyweights for turkeys last spring and was very impressed with its effectiveness even at "12 gauge" ranges.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Getting back to the topic at hand, the finder of property acquires no rights in mislaid property, is entitled to possession of lost property against everyone except the true owner, but is entitled to keep abandoned property, which is defined as property found in a place where the true owner intended to leave it with no intention of returning to claim it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from springerman3 wrote 1 year 45 weeks ago

Mactrager,
I hunt almost everything with a s/s 20 gauge ( not a duck hunter )and it hads plenty of kill power. You are limited in range a little but those who want more range are usually not capable to consistantly make kills at long range. ( past 40 yards )
Practice and become proficient with this gun out to 35 yards and you will have many enjoyable hunts !!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WinthropWyman wrote 1 year 16 weeks ago

Everything's always cheaper at amazon. A lot of times video games (brand new one's especially) will be between $1-$10 off. Older one's will be cheaper.
dj toronto

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Seslialemci wrote 1 year 15 weeks ago

As long as grandpa's purchase was in good faith, Buckingham's estate is out of luck. Sesli chat
Sesli sohbet

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MilburnNeville wrote 1 year 14 weeks ago

I do not expect the Copenhagen meeting to end in a clear agreement yet, but I do expect some progress to be made and that world leaders will take this very seriously.
polythene bags

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOEYBRYSON wrote 1 year 14 weeks ago

One has to leave soon from this world ( at the time of death) and at that time our TED knowledge will not count. It would only matter how much detachment we .practiced. How much my consciousness is purified.
Corporate Branding | Corporate Gifts | Business Gifts

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment