



November 17, 2011
Rimfire Scope Review: The Nikon Pro-Staff BDC 150
by David E. Petzal
When I showed up at the Kittery Trading Post to buy a used Anschutz .22, I was saddened to see that this peerless piece of Teutonic precision (one with a $1,000 price tag, new) was saddled with a piece-of-junk scope that you might use to hold a window open, or throw at an armadillo if one particularly annoyed you.
There is no abundance of good rimfire scopes—in fact, there are damned few—despite the fact that that the .22 is the foundation of any serious shooter’s gun collection. I guess most people feel that when they've bought the gun they've shot their wad (as it were) and look for something cheap and rotten to use as a sight.
This brings us to the new Nikon Pro-Staff BDC 150 3X-9X-40. It is a very, very good scope, and it comes with Nikon’s BDC reticle, which will enable you to shoot out to 150 yards. This particular reticle is calibrated to work only at 9 power, and only with hyper-velocity (1,600 fps) ammo, but with a little experimental shooting, you can adapt it to just about anything.
For example, I found that with high velocity ammo (1,200 fps) I could sight dead on at 25, which still had me dead on at 50 yards, and that, using the scope at 4X and sighting with the topmost BDC aiming circle, I was dead on at 100 yards. And that’s all I need.
Aside from that the BDC 150 is a full-sized scope (You’ll almost certainly need high rings.) that has brilliant optics and superb adjustments. Indeed, the adjustments are among the most accurate and positive that I have used on any scope, rim- or centerfire.
And now, you’re thinking, we come to the part where he says that the price is $1,098.35, but that it’s a great investment. No. This is the part where I tell you that the MSRP is $169.95 and that I see it on the Internet for $126. This makes it one of the great optical bargains of the year, or perhaps the century. www.nikonhunting.com
Comments (28)
Nice review for a practical piece of equipment. I currently use a Leupold VX-I on my .22 and never have regretted spending the money. I just finished the review on the Trijicon and was wondering Mr Petzal how do you compensate for holdover at longer ranges with your beanfield rifle?
I bought a ruger 10/22 for practice and squirrels.
I use the iron sights,...and that is part of the appeal for me.
I do have to admit, for those pesky lil tree rats laid out high in the live oaks, the scope might come in handy.
What do you shoot out to 100yds? targets only, or critters too?
I've found both the Nikon Prostaff and Redfield Revolution scopes to be tremendous values.
Over the years the biggest problem I have seen is a person having a nice .22 and then putting a piece of junk on it for a scope. I have used 3X9X40 scopes on my .22s for years and I prefer the Nikon Prostaff.
I have a Nikon ProStaff 2x-8x on my .22 Savage MkII. It's actually a scope meant for shotgun hunters, but it has done great. Now I think I might need to trade it in for this model.
I confess I was expecting a hefty price tag after that windup, but at that price the scope is definitely worth a look.
Have you ever used a Simmions 22MAG Scope with adjustable parallax? I have one on a CZ 452, and it's been great.
A gunsmith once told me "Your scope should cost twice as much as the rifle its mounted on". Maybe his math is a bit off but I understand his meaning and have found this to be correct over the years. This Nikon sounds to be a decent product at a reasonable cost which is adverse to the gunsmith's comment. There is always an exception...
I wanted something better than a cheap $40 blister-pack scope on my heavy-barrel Marlin .22 bolt action, but didn't want to spend too much. After reading some reviews I bought a Sightron S1. So far it's been excellent, and I prefer its simple, fine crosshairs.
For all you budget minded shooters, Field and Stream print edition has a Field Test of inexpensive scopes in this months edition.
I only remember buying two scopes for .22s. The first was to go with the first gun I ever bought, a 10/22. The other was when I bought a used .22 and didn't have a spare scope.
I've always taken the "good" scope from a centerfire and moved it to my .22 when I upgraded on the centerfire.
Seems to work for me.
Hehe, my 'good' 22 rifle is a Norinco JW-15 that cost me $80, new. Somehow putting a $169.95 scope on it just seems wrong.....
Currently it's wearing a Bushnel Sportview 3-9 rimfire scope that I got at a flea market for $20 many years ago.
Would you please give us the link to the site that offers this scope for $126.00? Or would there be a conflict of interest? Thank you.
I think Nikon scopes are by far the best value in Scopes.
Probably the reason is that they make so much optics..Cameras. binocs, spotting scopes...you name it..in
Optics, Nikon makes it. Thus, they are likely to be able to shave production costs & put out an optical product like scopes cheaper than equivalent values from other makers. They are also on the cutting edge of Optical Technology. My Scopes are mostly Nikon, Trijicon & a few
Bushnell Elites.
I vote Nikon & Trijicon.
Tom from Cody
The competion for a nice scope is 'steep'. Function is most important. After debating which to mount the scope upon.(At least there is always ~ 4 to choose from) Price is usually the deciding factor. Keep up the bargin hunting!
It is honesty time. I have a number of Nikon scopes with BDC and I am very happy with them. I bought this very one for my .17 Henry ($158 on EBAY). Which 2 weeks ago in a nice little stand of beechnuts, I stumble across 6 squirrels at 50 to 80 yards. And from a comfortable sitting position using a tree for a rest, happily miss all 6. Taking the Henry to the range and OOPS! The Nikon is off yet again. That would be the 4th or 5th time since I bought, its off again. Mounts have changed 3 times. Now small minute of angle adjustments have massive changes at 100 yards. Yep, a new (less than 1 year) scope thats blown. Now anything that is mass produced in a factory has the potential to create a lemon or 2. This is the real world and not an advertisement. It happens, So to be fair, the scope was packaged up and sent back to Nikon for repair. If they honor their warranty and what comes back to me performs. I will continue with Nikon. Forgive and gorget. If not… You guys have given me some ideas. Are you listening Nikon?
I'll let my ignorance shine for a moment here. What's the difference between a scope intended for a rimfire application and one for a centerfire?
Hi 007 - I believe most rimfire scopes are designed to be parallax-free at around 50 yards (nominal range for the .22 LR), while centerfire scopes are adjusted for 100 yards or longer. Scopes with an adjustable objective can be set to correct for parallax at any range.
Rangerdan, drop me a note please. I would be happy to help make sure you get squared away with your Nikon Scope issue. Thank you for being understanding.
Just so you know, we are listening and paying attention to what you the shooter wants in a scope.
bart
Nikon Pro Staff
e-mail bbk940@verizon.net
Kittery in NH? Is that the only one...? All I've ever heard of anyways.
My bad Maine... Haha. Close enough to my home state anyways.
I'm currently using a CenterPoint scope 3x9x32 and have it dialed in at 50 yards hitting a spot the size of a quarter. With my recent purchase of a Caldwell lead sled plus, I'll resight the scope in hoping to hit a target the size of a nickle. I use my .22 for squirrel and rabbit hunting. Having it sighted in hitting a quarter is good enough but sometime them squirrels don't give you a good target thru tree limbs and brush, that's why I'm looking at placing shots within the nickle or 1/2" groups. I've looked at Nikon, Redfield, Leupold and other high priced scopes but just don't see the need placing a $200 plus scope on a $150 rifle but to each there own.
Thanks, Twopipe, appreciated.
bman940; Thanks and Roger will do. The scope is in transit FEDEX ground right now to your repair facility in California. Should be there some time this week. If it gets repaired, no worries. I have a backup gun for small game. I like Nikon because the BDC is a great idea. Just like additional set of crosshairs for longer ranges. My .06 wears a an older Buckmaster and knocked down a deer or 2.
Bigbass09: You are a gentleman and a scholar.
I looked long and hard at the 3x9 w/BDC. But only being able to use the BDC at 9x, AND the little circle(s) are not quite the same as a front aperture as on .22 target sights, I opted for the 4X Prostaff Nikorex version. It is hard enough tracking a moving squirrel in a tree at 4X, let alone 9X. And as a bit of info, the top of the bottom heavy post is exactly the POA for the POI at 100 yd.s +/- for the load you are using. The Nikon Spot-on program will tell you exactly what distance if you input your .22 ammo information. I don't intend shooting squirrels or varmints beyond 100 yd.s. With the typical 1240 fps, e.g. Fed 510b, a hold on the top of the head, or ears on a squirrel at 75 yd.s results in a very dead squirrel. And as you mentioned, zeroed at 25 yd.s (I like to be .224 inches high at 25 yd.s) you are dead on at 50 yd.s and withing 1/2 inch up and down in between.
The optics on the scope are indeed super. The fine Nikorex reticule is very fine, but easily seen. I love it. I put it on my Browning ATD. It groups like a bolt action target rifle; I could not ask for more. Tigerbeetle
oh, thanks for that review! that's really informative! you should also check out protective police body armor to match that riffle. visit www.bulletproofvestshop.com today to get the best deal!
oh, thanks for that review! that's really informative! you should also check out protective police body armor to match that riffle. visit http://www.bulletproofvestshop.com/categories/Bullet-Proof-Vests-Body-Ar... today to get the best deal!
I know very little about scopes, so my opinion doesn't mean much. But based on Dave's recommendation, I purchased one of these from Amazon. Haven't taken it to the range yet, but the optics are bright, and crystal-clear. I really like the BDC reticle. I'll amend this review once I take it to the range.
Post a Comment
I've found both the Nikon Prostaff and Redfield Revolution scopes to be tremendous values.
For all you budget minded shooters, Field and Stream print edition has a Field Test of inexpensive scopes in this months edition.
I think Nikon scopes are by far the best value in Scopes.
Probably the reason is that they make so much optics..Cameras. binocs, spotting scopes...you name it..in
Optics, Nikon makes it. Thus, they are likely to be able to shave production costs & put out an optical product like scopes cheaper than equivalent values from other makers. They are also on the cutting edge of Optical Technology. My Scopes are mostly Nikon, Trijicon & a few
Bushnell Elites.
I vote Nikon & Trijicon.
Tom from Cody
It is honesty time. I have a number of Nikon scopes with BDC and I am very happy with them. I bought this very one for my .17 Henry ($158 on EBAY). Which 2 weeks ago in a nice little stand of beechnuts, I stumble across 6 squirrels at 50 to 80 yards. And from a comfortable sitting position using a tree for a rest, happily miss all 6. Taking the Henry to the range and OOPS! The Nikon is off yet again. That would be the 4th or 5th time since I bought, its off again. Mounts have changed 3 times. Now small minute of angle adjustments have massive changes at 100 yards. Yep, a new (less than 1 year) scope thats blown. Now anything that is mass produced in a factory has the potential to create a lemon or 2. This is the real world and not an advertisement. It happens, So to be fair, the scope was packaged up and sent back to Nikon for repair. If they honor their warranty and what comes back to me performs. I will continue with Nikon. Forgive and gorget. If not… You guys have given me some ideas. Are you listening Nikon?
Nice review for a practical piece of equipment. I currently use a Leupold VX-I on my .22 and never have regretted spending the money. I just finished the review on the Trijicon and was wondering Mr Petzal how do you compensate for holdover at longer ranges with your beanfield rifle?
I bought a ruger 10/22 for practice and squirrels.
I use the iron sights,...and that is part of the appeal for me.
I do have to admit, for those pesky lil tree rats laid out high in the live oaks, the scope might come in handy.
What do you shoot out to 100yds? targets only, or critters too?
Over the years the biggest problem I have seen is a person having a nice .22 and then putting a piece of junk on it for a scope. I have used 3X9X40 scopes on my .22s for years and I prefer the Nikon Prostaff.
I have a Nikon ProStaff 2x-8x on my .22 Savage MkII. It's actually a scope meant for shotgun hunters, but it has done great. Now I think I might need to trade it in for this model.
I confess I was expecting a hefty price tag after that windup, but at that price the scope is definitely worth a look.
Have you ever used a Simmions 22MAG Scope with adjustable parallax? I have one on a CZ 452, and it's been great.
A gunsmith once told me "Your scope should cost twice as much as the rifle its mounted on". Maybe his math is a bit off but I understand his meaning and have found this to be correct over the years. This Nikon sounds to be a decent product at a reasonable cost which is adverse to the gunsmith's comment. There is always an exception...
I wanted something better than a cheap $40 blister-pack scope on my heavy-barrel Marlin .22 bolt action, but didn't want to spend too much. After reading some reviews I bought a Sightron S1. So far it's been excellent, and I prefer its simple, fine crosshairs.
I only remember buying two scopes for .22s. The first was to go with the first gun I ever bought, a 10/22. The other was when I bought a used .22 and didn't have a spare scope.
I've always taken the "good" scope from a centerfire and moved it to my .22 when I upgraded on the centerfire.
Seems to work for me.
Hehe, my 'good' 22 rifle is a Norinco JW-15 that cost me $80, new. Somehow putting a $169.95 scope on it just seems wrong.....
Currently it's wearing a Bushnel Sportview 3-9 rimfire scope that I got at a flea market for $20 many years ago.
Would you please give us the link to the site that offers this scope for $126.00? Or would there be a conflict of interest? Thank you.
The competion for a nice scope is 'steep'. Function is most important. After debating which to mount the scope upon.(At least there is always ~ 4 to choose from) Price is usually the deciding factor. Keep up the bargin hunting!
I'll let my ignorance shine for a moment here. What's the difference between a scope intended for a rimfire application and one for a centerfire?
Hi 007 - I believe most rimfire scopes are designed to be parallax-free at around 50 yards (nominal range for the .22 LR), while centerfire scopes are adjusted for 100 yards or longer. Scopes with an adjustable objective can be set to correct for parallax at any range.
Rangerdan, drop me a note please. I would be happy to help make sure you get squared away with your Nikon Scope issue. Thank you for being understanding.
Just so you know, we are listening and paying attention to what you the shooter wants in a scope.
bart
Nikon Pro Staff
e-mail bbk940@verizon.net
Kittery in NH? Is that the only one...? All I've ever heard of anyways.
My bad Maine... Haha. Close enough to my home state anyways.
I'm currently using a CenterPoint scope 3x9x32 and have it dialed in at 50 yards hitting a spot the size of a quarter. With my recent purchase of a Caldwell lead sled plus, I'll resight the scope in hoping to hit a target the size of a nickle. I use my .22 for squirrel and rabbit hunting. Having it sighted in hitting a quarter is good enough but sometime them squirrels don't give you a good target thru tree limbs and brush, that's why I'm looking at placing shots within the nickle or 1/2" groups. I've looked at Nikon, Redfield, Leupold and other high priced scopes but just don't see the need placing a $200 plus scope on a $150 rifle but to each there own.
Thanks, Twopipe, appreciated.
bman940; Thanks and Roger will do. The scope is in transit FEDEX ground right now to your repair facility in California. Should be there some time this week. If it gets repaired, no worries. I have a backup gun for small game. I like Nikon because the BDC is a great idea. Just like additional set of crosshairs for longer ranges. My .06 wears a an older Buckmaster and knocked down a deer or 2.
Bigbass09: You are a gentleman and a scholar.
I looked long and hard at the 3x9 w/BDC. But only being able to use the BDC at 9x, AND the little circle(s) are not quite the same as a front aperture as on .22 target sights, I opted for the 4X Prostaff Nikorex version. It is hard enough tracking a moving squirrel in a tree at 4X, let alone 9X. And as a bit of info, the top of the bottom heavy post is exactly the POA for the POI at 100 yd.s +/- for the load you are using. The Nikon Spot-on program will tell you exactly what distance if you input your .22 ammo information. I don't intend shooting squirrels or varmints beyond 100 yd.s. With the typical 1240 fps, e.g. Fed 510b, a hold on the top of the head, or ears on a squirrel at 75 yd.s results in a very dead squirrel. And as you mentioned, zeroed at 25 yd.s (I like to be .224 inches high at 25 yd.s) you are dead on at 50 yd.s and withing 1/2 inch up and down in between.
The optics on the scope are indeed super. The fine Nikorex reticule is very fine, but easily seen. I love it. I put it on my Browning ATD. It groups like a bolt action target rifle; I could not ask for more. Tigerbeetle
oh, thanks for that review! that's really informative! you should also check out protective police body armor to match that riffle. visit www.bulletproofvestshop.com today to get the best deal!
oh, thanks for that review! that's really informative! you should also check out protective police body armor to match that riffle. visit http://www.bulletproofvestshop.com/categories/Bullet-Proof-Vests-Body-Ar... today to get the best deal!
I know very little about scopes, so my opinion doesn't mean much. But based on Dave's recommendation, I purchased one of these from Amazon. Haven't taken it to the range yet, but the optics are bright, and crystal-clear. I really like the BDC reticle. I'll amend this review once I take it to the range.
Post a Comment