Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

New Camo From Sitka: Optifade Marsh Pattern

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 17, 2012

New Camo From Sitka: Optifade Marsh Pattern

John Taranto explains how this new waterfowl-specific camo pattern from Sitka works from a bird's eye view.

Comments (6)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Hmmm. A camo waterfowl coat with a prominent red manufacturer's label on the front? Ooops. Have to admit I really don't care for the fish-scale look. And I wouldn't want a duck hunting coat that didn't have a covering flap over the zipper. In a driving rainstorm water will go right through and exposed zipper. Good luck to Sitka selling this product. I think they'll need it.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from NHshtr wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Perhaps from their extensive research they found that from a 45 degree angle, waterfowl can't see red! ;)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Sitka make some pretty high performance raingear, so I'm sure they have the zipper figured out. There are waders with zippers, so why does it need a fly? Just sayin'.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 18 weeks 17 hours ago

Hmmm. Thanks for the info WAM. I was not aware that waders were being made with full-length front zippers. Simms has a couple of models. I would be curious to see how they managed that.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

That is even FUGLIER than my old BDUs! Camo is overrated.
I wear Forest Green or Carhart

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

Moishe, obviously you are not a duck hunter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from NHshtr wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Perhaps from their extensive research they found that from a 45 degree angle, waterfowl can't see red! ;)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Sitka make some pretty high performance raingear, so I'm sure they have the zipper figured out. There are waders with zippers, so why does it need a fly? Just sayin'.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 18 weeks 17 hours ago

Hmmm. Thanks for the info WAM. I was not aware that waders were being made with full-length front zippers. Simms has a couple of models. I would be curious to see how they managed that.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

That is even FUGLIER than my old BDUs! Camo is overrated.
I wear Forest Green or Carhart

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 3 days ago

Moishe, obviously you are not a duck hunter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 18 weeks 1 day ago

Hmmm. A camo waterfowl coat with a prominent red manufacturer's label on the front? Ooops. Have to admit I really don't care for the fish-scale look. And I wouldn't want a duck hunting coat that didn't have a covering flap over the zipper. In a driving rainstorm water will go right through and exposed zipper. Good luck to Sitka selling this product. I think they'll need it.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs