



July 20, 2012
Book Review: 'Shotgunning: The Art and Science'
By Phil Bourjaily

Anhinga sagely commented on Wednesday’s post that Bob Brister’s "Shotgunning: The Art and Science" answers many of the ballistic questions that shotgunners argue over. Written by my predecessor as Field & Stream’s shotgun columnist, is available from Skyhorse Publishing in a reprinted edition, and the first edition can be found readily at Amazon.com and other online sellers. My copy is nearly worn out from repeated re-readings.
Brister was a great competitive and field shooter with an inquiring mind. The book is most famous for the work he did testing shotstrings. Shotstrings are hard to measure but Brister’s methodology was brilliantly simple: he rigged up an 18 foot trailer as a moving pattern board and had his wife tow it past him at right angles at 35 mph with a station wagon while he shot different loads at it. The patterns weren’t the round clusters we see on stationary pattern boards but elongated spreads reflecting the lag between the first and last pellets in a shotstring fired at a crossing target. Some of the patterns stretched almost from one end of the 18 foot sheet to the other. The book’s many photos of the moving patterns Brister clearly showed the effects of shotstringing especially with some of the lower quality magnum lead duck loads of the '70s.
Brister’s book also includes some very interesting duck load lethality tables taken from Winchester’s Nilo Farms tests conducted in the 70s. Winchester engineers strapped game farm ducks to a moving track that ran past a full choke shotgun set to shoot when the duck passed it and tested it with different loads on 2,400 mallards. The results were then built into a computer model of shotshell lethality which is discussed thoroughly in the book. I asked about the track last time I went to Nilo and was told it still exists, but there is no way such a test would be conducted today.
Unfortunately, steel shot was in its infancy when this book was written (Brister was an early advocate of non-toxic shot during the heated debates of the '70s) and I wish he had revised the book to cover improved steel loads, bismuth and tungsten-non-toxics, but unfortunately, he never did, although he covered many of those developments in the pages of Field & Stream.
The book is a very easy, non-technical read as well as a fascinating, and an indispensible addition to any shotgunner’s bookshelf.
Comments (13)
Great assessment of Brister's work Phil. Every 'wing shooter' should read it, including those young 'trappers' you work with.
Hope it would address my question that seemed to fly over everyone's head regarding speed of barrel movement, and the faster the barrel moves the less forward lead is necessary on passing targets.
Sayfu -- I'll bite. yes, the faster you move the barrel, the less the perceived lead. It also means you have less time to trigger the shot at the right instant. I used to shoot skeet swinging fast through targets as you describe and I would agree that I saw very little lead even on station 4. Now I shoot a semi-maintained lead style (called "put the gun in front of the target and shoot"). Now I see lots of lead, but I also break more targets.
Wow, I don't know if my wife would let me shoot at a trailer she was towing, but then again she has seen me shoot. LOL
Phil...No biting necessary, just an hones discussion requested. And that is what I thought to be true, and did say in an earlier statement that moveing the gun more along the lines of the speed of the target gives you more reaction time to pull the trigger. The faster you move the barrel, the less reaction time, but the less perceived lead needed as well. That being said, my next thought is...if you have a faster load, can that lend itself to less speed of barrel movement needed, and less perceived lead providing a longer reaction time in the kill zone?
I'm sure Mr. brister's book is very good but I'm not much into the technical side of shotgun shooting. I am a self taught shooter from way back in the time of paper shells and cardboard wads. I may not adhere to classic shotgun use but what I do works for me. To me shooting is a sport a fun sport not a job and hunting is and always will be my first love. I may read the book just for the heck of it. if you happen to look at my photo it is circa 1955 and I had a cap pistol then, I was 6 years old.
Sayfu,
A speeding shotgun swing is not always a good thing. In fact, it's poison.
A time ago a very good competition skeet shooter and friend commented after a round how fast I swing a shotgun on the stations. It was his opinion I'd have better and more consistent scores if I slowed my swing, and held my shotgun at the spot the target to came into focus.
Believe our good friend Phil covered this subject in an earlier blog.
It seems a very fast swing has a shooter so completely committed as to be fooled into out guessing a unpredictable target...and missing.
The 18-foot trailer test is brilliant! But the duck test gives me the creeps.
Mark-1..You are missing my point again...slow down and read. I did not say that a speeding barrel was necessarily a good thing. It limits the time you have to pull the trigger in the kill zone. BUT, and get my point. It does reduce the needed perceived lead on crossing shots! The faster the barrel moves the less lead needed. Now, given that as fact, can it also be true that a faster load can reduce the perceived lead. Could it be that I could slow down my barrel swing on crossing shots, and have more time to pull the trigger in the kill zone IF I used a faster load?...think about it.
Sayfu,
Maybe, but I don't believe it's good wing shooting technique. You may be over analyzing factors of marginal impact in wing shooting.
150-years of shotgunning science hasn't really changed much except for the manufacturing materials used. I think the last big deal was the shot cup.
Shooting techniques really haven't changed much IMHO.
A good read of Bob Brister is in order for you.
Mark, I well could be over analyzing, BUT, speed of barrel movement has a direct relationship with forward lead, and I was then trying to make a correlation with shot speed as well. And speed of barrel movement is an individual thing as well I do believe. I would imagine that those sharp, usually young international trap Oympians move the barrel quite fast to score on fast moving international targets, and to be able to score on doubles. Here's a story as an example. I know a rather young master class sporting clays shooter. The guy's a lefty. I asked him about lead, and the guy says, "I don't have to lead a crossing target an inch! I shoot right at it!" So I watch this guy as he demonstrates practicing on sporting clays crossing shots. He moved that barrel so fast that in his mind he was shooting right at the crossing target. Now I don't know whether he was, or not even standing behind the guy, and I'm not sure the shooter even knows when they describe what they saw after the fact. But no doubt this guy had very fast reaction time, something that an older shooter loses, or a shooter that doesn't shoot a thousand targets a week, or much more just doesn't have. But, I do agree with you on smoothness of swing, and moving at the speed of the target as probably being the best technique. What I try to get at is the physics involved in shooting, and many on this thread just can't follow the physics of shooting at a moving target with a shotgun..me included some of the time, but I do try to learn what's involved. I've known great performers in other sports who are clueless as to the physics of how they perform at such a high level. They don't even want to talk about it, as it clutters up their mind, and screws up their focus on the task at hand. Those folks, I can't much talk to.
Perhaps more of us should follow the late Michael McIntosh thoughts on lead " just shoot the bleeping thing " ......
Generally as a shotgunner if you start to think about where you want ( need ) to put the gun. Especially when they start talking about slowing gun speed down if they are shooting faster loads.
I shot at a CONSEP class yesterday and saw no distinct difference in the lead I use when I shot my normal shells ( reloads with lead ) vs the steel loads we were using ( Remington Sportsman Steel )
While I am now more educated about steel and the dynamics of shooting it that doesn't mean I will switch.
It is a good class for the average hunter/wing shooter to attend and I hope they start to offer more of them. They are paid for with grant money from Pittman-Robertson funds so you are really paying yourself back by attending !
Have a great day :)
Springerman...My approach is to think about it...think about what is the reality regarding a moving barrel, and a moving target. Practice, practice, practice, and then we can commit our mechanics to muscle memory, and not have to think about it. Now your shooting is based on science, and you can make adjustments. But to miss, and have no basis as to what the realties are? IMO it is the difference between a good shooter, and the ave. Joe that says to just go out and have fun. Depends on what you want.
Post a Comment
Sayfu,
Maybe, but I don't believe it's good wing shooting technique. You may be over analyzing factors of marginal impact in wing shooting.
150-years of shotgunning science hasn't really changed much except for the manufacturing materials used. I think the last big deal was the shot cup.
Shooting techniques really haven't changed much IMHO.
A good read of Bob Brister is in order for you.
Perhaps more of us should follow the late Michael McIntosh thoughts on lead " just shoot the bleeping thing " ......
Generally as a shotgunner if you start to think about where you want ( need ) to put the gun. Especially when they start talking about slowing gun speed down if they are shooting faster loads.
I shot at a CONSEP class yesterday and saw no distinct difference in the lead I use when I shot my normal shells ( reloads with lead ) vs the steel loads we were using ( Remington Sportsman Steel )
While I am now more educated about steel and the dynamics of shooting it that doesn't mean I will switch.
It is a good class for the average hunter/wing shooter to attend and I hope they start to offer more of them. They are paid for with grant money from Pittman-Robertson funds so you are really paying yourself back by attending !
Have a great day :)
Great assessment of Brister's work Phil. Every 'wing shooter' should read it, including those young 'trappers' you work with.
Sayfu -- I'll bite. yes, the faster you move the barrel, the less the perceived lead. It also means you have less time to trigger the shot at the right instant. I used to shoot skeet swinging fast through targets as you describe and I would agree that I saw very little lead even on station 4. Now I shoot a semi-maintained lead style (called "put the gun in front of the target and shoot"). Now I see lots of lead, but I also break more targets.
Wow, I don't know if my wife would let me shoot at a trailer she was towing, but then again she has seen me shoot. LOL
I'm sure Mr. brister's book is very good but I'm not much into the technical side of shotgun shooting. I am a self taught shooter from way back in the time of paper shells and cardboard wads. I may not adhere to classic shotgun use but what I do works for me. To me shooting is a sport a fun sport not a job and hunting is and always will be my first love. I may read the book just for the heck of it. if you happen to look at my photo it is circa 1955 and I had a cap pistol then, I was 6 years old.
Sayfu,
A speeding shotgun swing is not always a good thing. In fact, it's poison.
A time ago a very good competition skeet shooter and friend commented after a round how fast I swing a shotgun on the stations. It was his opinion I'd have better and more consistent scores if I slowed my swing, and held my shotgun at the spot the target to came into focus.
Believe our good friend Phil covered this subject in an earlier blog.
It seems a very fast swing has a shooter so completely committed as to be fooled into out guessing a unpredictable target...and missing.
The 18-foot trailer test is brilliant! But the duck test gives me the creeps.
Mark-1..You are missing my point again...slow down and read. I did not say that a speeding barrel was necessarily a good thing. It limits the time you have to pull the trigger in the kill zone. BUT, and get my point. It does reduce the needed perceived lead on crossing shots! The faster the barrel moves the less lead needed. Now, given that as fact, can it also be true that a faster load can reduce the perceived lead. Could it be that I could slow down my barrel swing on crossing shots, and have more time to pull the trigger in the kill zone IF I used a faster load?...think about it.
Springerman...My approach is to think about it...think about what is the reality regarding a moving barrel, and a moving target. Practice, practice, practice, and then we can commit our mechanics to muscle memory, and not have to think about it. Now your shooting is based on science, and you can make adjustments. But to miss, and have no basis as to what the realties are? IMO it is the difference between a good shooter, and the ave. Joe that says to just go out and have fun. Depends on what you want.
Hope it would address my question that seemed to fly over everyone's head regarding speed of barrel movement, and the faster the barrel moves the less forward lead is necessary on passing targets.
Phil...No biting necessary, just an hones discussion requested. And that is what I thought to be true, and did say in an earlier statement that moveing the gun more along the lines of the speed of the target gives you more reaction time to pull the trigger. The faster you move the barrel, the less reaction time, but the less perceived lead needed as well. That being said, my next thought is...if you have a faster load, can that lend itself to less speed of barrel movement needed, and less perceived lead providing a longer reaction time in the kill zone?
Mark, I well could be over analyzing, BUT, speed of barrel movement has a direct relationship with forward lead, and I was then trying to make a correlation with shot speed as well. And speed of barrel movement is an individual thing as well I do believe. I would imagine that those sharp, usually young international trap Oympians move the barrel quite fast to score on fast moving international targets, and to be able to score on doubles. Here's a story as an example. I know a rather young master class sporting clays shooter. The guy's a lefty. I asked him about lead, and the guy says, "I don't have to lead a crossing target an inch! I shoot right at it!" So I watch this guy as he demonstrates practicing on sporting clays crossing shots. He moved that barrel so fast that in his mind he was shooting right at the crossing target. Now I don't know whether he was, or not even standing behind the guy, and I'm not sure the shooter even knows when they describe what they saw after the fact. But no doubt this guy had very fast reaction time, something that an older shooter loses, or a shooter that doesn't shoot a thousand targets a week, or much more just doesn't have. But, I do agree with you on smoothness of swing, and moving at the speed of the target as probably being the best technique. What I try to get at is the physics involved in shooting, and many on this thread just can't follow the physics of shooting at a moving target with a shotgun..me included some of the time, but I do try to learn what's involved. I've known great performers in other sports who are clueless as to the physics of how they perform at such a high level. They don't even want to talk about it, as it clutters up their mind, and screws up their focus on the task at hand. Those folks, I can't much talk to.
Post a Comment