



August 15, 2012
The 5-Shot Syndrome: Be Sure of Your Rifle's Reliability
By David E. Petzal
Although I have no earthly business buying guns anymore, I still surf the Internet looking for interesting stuff, and a little while ago I came across a very fine dangerous-game rifle chambered for the nightmarish .458 Lott. The gun was built by a maker for whose work I have the utmost respect, but what interested me most was the owner’s notation that the rifle had been fired only five times to sight it in.
There is something desperately wrong with that. Oxen and wain ropes would not hale me on a safari with a dangerous-game rifle I had fired only five times. If you are going to mix it up with an animal whose idea of a good time is ramming a horn up your fundament, it’s highly recommended that you be sure your rifle functions, and you can’t make sure of this in five shots. Fifty is a good start.
The gun’s owner may have had sublime faith in the work of the man who built it, and felt no need to make sure the rifle functioned. I can’t say I disagree with him here.
As to the shooting end of it, handling a big gun such as the .458 Lott requires considerable practice. It may be that our friend is a highly experienced shooter of big rifles, already owning a .460 Weatherby, .500 NE, and .478 Thunderf***er, and handling a big gun is nothing new to him.
However, most PHs, I think, assume that their clients have little experience with their heavy rifles, and are pleasantly surprised if they turn out to be wrong.
The rifle in question here is a semi-custom gun whose new price is around $4,500. You’d think that paying this kind of money would guarantee complete reliability, but such is not the case. I’ve had plenty of custom rifles that failed, one way or another. Factory rifles are even more prone to failure. They are not painstaking assembled by skilled craftsmen nor, from what I’ve seen, are they checked for function. Just this year I’ve had four rifles in my hands that had something major wrong with them. There is one expensive line of European rifles that has a 50 percent reliability record with me. I’ve shot, I believe, a dozen of them over the years and six have had problems. If you get one that works, it’s terrific, but that is by no means guaranteed.
The typical rifle carried by a PH is not a thing of beauty. Most professional hunters settle on one or two rifles early on in their careers and stay with them, and the guns get used very hard. Typical of the breed is Harry Selby’s .416 Rigby, which he used for 50 years.
All these guns have two things in common:
First, they work.
Second, their owners are as familiar with them as they are with their own body parts. A PH handles his rifle as if it were an extension of himself, because it is. The alternative is getting stomped or et or clawed. Better to know your rifle and die at a ripe old age of abulia or paresis.
Comments (47)
Dave you are the only thing that keeps me coming back to this site.
So many guns, so little time. Love your last five-lines, DP.
I settled on a custom Mauser 35 Whelen...willed to my son, then a 1903 Springfield [replacement for the Mauser] and a Winchester 70 in 458.
Stomped, et, fundaments,abulia,paresis, wain ropes(?). Stealing a line from Larry the Cable Guy "I don't care who you are, that's good stuff".
That .458 Lott rifle reminds me of a .44 Magnum revolver I once saw for sale with 48 rounds of ammo. The owner had decided that enough was more than enough.
Back in the day, in a galaxy far, far away, we just about wore out our weapons shooting and training. Put a couple thousand rounds through a CAR-15 and you know it works. I have two handguns that have had literaly thousands of rounds fired through them; a Browning Hi-Power and a Smith & Wesson Model 19 Combat Magnum. Now those guns are not the newest high tech tacti-cool polymer whiz bangs with picatinny rails everywhere, but I can gar-on-tee you that they will go BANG every time they are cycled. I can't think of any hunting rifle of mine that has not had well over a hundred rounds fired through it by me, except my latest acquisition which has only had 50 or so rounds through it. But it probably will have 40-50 more before the elk opener.....
Thanks Mr. Petzal for a good column today. No only did I laugh a bit, I also added a couple of new words to my vocabulary.
To Beekeeper: Thank you, but that is a heavy burden you lay on me.
I am a avid reader of Field and Stream and I visit this site dozens of times per week and I always go straight to you first Mr. Petzal...I am a gun nut to the core and you provide honest insight with no frills and that is how is should be...I only wish I had become a F&S reader years prior to 2005, I am certain I missed some valuable lessons.
as always,mr petzal is extremely entertaining and erudite as well. keep fighting the good fight d.p. and we'll keep reading.
Fundament!! HAHAHAHA...... That is a classic word of Old English.
Fundament. Heh! I haven't heard that one in a while. But you're right. A rifle that won't work is useless.
Last season, I pulled my Semi custom O3-A3 out of mothballs and after shooting so many production guns I forgot what it feels to hold a fully functional trust worthy beauty again. It was like first love all over again!
I bet you won't find factory ammo for the .478 Thunderf****er in every mom and pop store so don't forget yours when traveling on that DG hunt. Mr Petzal sir, you are a treasure. I love this blog and am upset when you take a day off.
I have rifles ranging from .177 all the way up to the mighty 50 and couldnt agree more. Familiarity is key. David is the reason I started dabbling in outdoor writing and has officially got me interested in aquiring a .478 Thunderf***er
Perhaps the gentleman realized the nightmare of the .416 Lott after only 5 rounds?
I think a lot of people think like you as when I go to the range I see many people firing over a 200-300 rounds per outing per weapon and they wonder why shooters buy large quantities of ammo. I shocked n acquaintance at a dinner when being questioned about my gun "nuttiness" I mentioned I go thru 2-3000 rounds of ammo a year.
Deer are never going to be confused with dangerous game, but I have a new custom rifle that I've put over 70 rounds through and I believe the barrel is fire-lapped now. The accuracy on this rifle is good as load work up has been an education as well as fun. There are four different loads that produce 1" or smaller groups. I think about the time I hit the 90-100 rounds I'll have everything ready for this rifle to take to the field.
Hope is not a plan, and it reads like the owner of the five-shot wonder is in for a surprise (or a shock) when he gets into the field with his new rifle. I would fire it at least five times to work out any possible quirks that have developed since the rifle left home and got to the safari location.
Dave, that was a good one. Glad I checked back in here today. IMO shooting practice is like smooching with the wife you can't overdo it.
I had no idea Fundament was a real word. Had to look it up! But my Grand Pop often spoke of courting my Grandmother (he called her the "old gray heifer") in a convertible - a Wain pulled by 2 jennies. He would always laugh when us grand kids had such dumb looks on our faces.... "What's a wain?"
The hands always went to her hips in fists when she heard that heifer comment.
Dave, your command of the language is a very rare commodity among outdoor writers and likely most, if not all, college english professors. You have expressed no desire to write another book, but will you give serious consideration to recording some of your adventures and mis-adventures on CD's?
To Clay Cooper:
I know just how you fell. I take my Model 99 Savage out every time I go to the range. I haven't carried it in the field for nearly a decade, but she shoots and shoots very straight out to 200 yards. I have loved that rifle ever since I first saw my Mom carry it deer hunting a half century ago. Dark blue steel and dark, almost black walnut. It is a thing of beauty and just feels right.
I think if I get drawn for deer or elk next year I will tune her up and carry my old friend that puts meat in the freezer. Thanks for getting me thinking.
Dr. Petzal;
This is exactly why I usually show up in deer camp with my old Savage 338 as the primary or backup gun.
I know it works every time.
I know where it hits.
I know it like a part of my body.
I know it's a lot for mule deer, and I take a lot of grief, but I don't miss too often and don't track wounded game too often either.
As much as I try to get away from it, I always come back to it.
Just my two cents worth.
AKX
Mr. Petzal,
I have only one thing to say to you, sir … if you keep on drinking rum, the world will soon be quit of a very dirty scoundrel!
I have handled several "Used" Weatherby's in 300 Weatherby and above at the local gun store that are new in the box with a box of shells with 14 cartridges left. Someone buys these things because they have to have one take it to the range and can't handle the recoil.
Tootall75-Off topic,but I have been going through the Gun Nuts archives for the last week or so and there are so many pearls of wisdom that I definitely recommend you read some of the old articles if you can.
Dave,
Maybe a good future post would be PHs/Guides/Outfitters and the guns that they carry in North America contrasted or compared with Africa.
Safado,
That's is how mine came. Not a scratch nor streak of copper nor a mark of brass on the bolt face! Not even a trace of a sling swivel in the lugs. I didn't get the half box of shells, however. 50% of retail is a good deal! The girlie-men should learn to handload the hard kickers down to 30-06 or 7mm Rem levels instead of getting rid of a good rifle! Is "Man-Up" one word or two?
WAM,
Amen brother, Here's to the girly men. There is a beautiful semi custom Sako in .375 H & H sitting in the store calling to me now. It's immaculate only has a couple of issues. I don't really need a 375 H & H, but what does need ever have to do with a gun purchase? It has a muzzle brake and it's left handed. The left handed part is not a real problem because although I'm right handed I'm left eye dominant. Decisions...decisions!
I don't have or need a .375 H&H nor a .300 H&H, but would like to have one if the price were right! Classic rifles to be sure! Need? I did not "need" another rifle when I only had a .308 and a .35 Whelen! Everything else is a sign of self-indulgence and materialism on my part.
Who all chambers a rifle for the .478 Thunderf***er these days?
Who all chambers a rifle for the .478 Thunderf***er these days?
I just read a post from a few years ago from Happy Myles. It appears the stock broke in his Sako in .375 H & H. The one I have been handling struck me as light for a .375 but it points so well!!! The bore is bright and shiny the wood is immaculate. It's probably 30 years old at least.
Your writing is always a pleasure DP. Your prose reminds me of the work of a columnist with the SF Chronicle - Charles McCabe - back in the 60s-70s. Always had a smart, satirical view of the world. Upon his retirement, he asked the paper to replace his column with that of another writer at the paper. This other writer was mediocre, on his best days. McCabe insured that he would be missed...
Dave.....
Love this article but a little confused...
Your words taken directly from previous Article Best of the Best.......
But for something like Best of the Best, where I have perhaps 10 or a dozen rifles to shoot and not a lot of time in which to do it, it’s senseless to pour ammunition through them when you can see, right up front, whether they’re any good or not.
(you shot 9 rounds per gun if memory serves)
Now you post in this article .....
If you are going to mix it up with an animal whose idea of a good time is ramming a horn up your fundament, it’s highly recommended that you be sure your rifle functions, and you can’t make sure of this in five shots. Fifty is a good start.
So as top dog at F&S for firearms.... Which is it?...... Article 1 or Article 2
I have alot of respect for your knowledge of firearms and have learned from reading your articles.
However you are delivering two very diff messages here. Could you please clear up your position?
Any Firearm can kill... so they ALL should be treated with the same respect and attention to detail with time not being a factor ....
Let the howls of discord and calls for off with his head begin... I am a big boy I can take it.
Aboulia or Abulia (from the Greek "αβουλία", meaning "un-will"), in neurology, refers to a lack of will or initiative and is one of the Disorders of Diminished Motivation or DDM. Aboulia falls in the middle of the spectrum of diminished motivation, with apathy being less extreme and akinetic mutism being more extreme than aboulia.
Why do I always have to look things up when I come to this site? Dave for president.
When buying a big bore rifle I am never overly concerned regarding the prior use of the rifle unless something is blatantly evident. A varmint gun is an entirely different matter as it usually has been fired many many times by the owner. The same holds true for used trap guns, normally lots of wear. Actually my favorite .416, an older Sako, is fired 100 times or so a year then only for reducing boulders into rocks which I understand is in violation of the BLM per some folks.
DEP off topic but of interest since you recently gave rave reviews of the Ruger American. Cabela's in Billings, MT has them on sale in all chamberings for $339.00.
To Vehicle
I think your are comparing apples to oranges. Your average joe schmoe who has humpteen rifles in his battery has probably shot rifles long enough to know what to take out for your average deer, elk, etc. If you happen to be one of the relatively few who goes after game that can:
A. Trounce on your body until it is a corpse
B. Swat at you with a paw that can take your head off
C. Can bite you enough to kill and eat you
One should be darn sure your rifle will perform flawlessly or just as importantly YOU perform flawlessly with your rifle which kick more than the proverbial mule. As my ol' football coach use to say, Practice doesn't make perfect, Perfect practice makes perfect.
One can only assume the user took his lion, leopard, elephant, rhino and buff with the first five shots...
To Buckstopper,
The point I am trying to get across is this.... A .22 will kill you just as dead as a .375 the rifle/ammo is not the issue.
I am trying to understand the difference that arise between David's articles in regards to rounds fired to reach the goal.
Vehicle,
The previous article was about how accurate a rifle may or may not be. This is about making sure the thing will feed, fire, and eject every time.
Comprehension of the written word is a glorious thing!
Dave, if you are truely our friend you would disclose the junky 50% rifles you have owned. Billy be damned the advertising. If it's junk I want to know about it !
Vehicle,
I take exception that you can kill someone better with a .22 than a .375. I can kill a large animal with one shot with a .22 if I get a good hit in the lungs. The problem is how LONG IT TAKES TO DIE. Various mischief can occur until till it expires. That is the point Dave is trying to make. If I misfire my old .270 on a buck, I can count on some ribbing from my buddies. If my H&H express rifle misfires on a charging bull elephant or a poorly hit lion, what is left of me comes home in a box.
On a side note look up Gen. Hatchers study on the ballistics of a .45 Colt pistol round vs a .38 Long Colt. Hence the development of the .45ACP to deal with drug crazed radical Muslim insurgents. Funny how physics of the early 20th Century still applies to the 21st Century.
Back when the Danube was blue, at Abercrombie's in New York, or at Pachmeyer's, or at Kerr's in Los Angeles it was not unusual to find large caliber fancy custom rifles for sale with few, and indeed sometimes no rounds fired through them. My hunch is that wealthy fellows over a few too many cocktails enthusiastically planned African safaris and accordingly ordered up fancy big caliber rifles and terai hats. Later trips could afford to be canceled or a few rounds fired at a range cooled their ardor for teeth jarring recoil they had never experienced, steering them toward rifles with recoil of friendlier persuasion.
A followup on my earlier message. My first 416 Rigby was such a rifle crafted by Griffen & Howe. It had never been fired, and was one of a set of three rifles, a 300 H & H, a 375 H & H , and the 416. I could not afford all three, but Frank Pachmeyer was willing to sell me the 416 separately from the other two. Several decades later after hard use and exciting adventure it is battered but still unbeaten. I would not trade it for anything.
Safado, the 375 I mentioned that acquired a recoil caused split behind the tang was still accurate after the split was mended. The Sako stock was just a little light for my fancy.
Sorry am weighing in late on this topic, have been in and out of the hospital the past couple months, and just noticed this topic. Kindest Regards
@ Tony C: I do believe the 478 Thunderf****r is custom made by a well-known chap by the name of Alfred E. Neuman.
@Buckstopper: As a former peace-officer, I must take exception to your first sentence regarding a .22. If you shoot someone, as your sentence states, in the head, the .22 will kill just as surely and as quickly as a .375. Stated from experience as an eye-witness.
forgive me for I have sinned. I have never had the opportunity or the funds to hunt the big toothy claw carrying beasts or the enormous horned or tusked fauna. My chances at being eaten by a vicious animal and defecated off a cliff is nil.I fear I shall never see Africa or Alaska. My lot is cast cruel fate has forced me to hunt the various deer species in north America.My one dangerous beast to hunt is the wild hog and Tennessee has seen fit to close that season sad indeed.
therefore I have only seen fit to shoot my rifles to sight them in, practice a bit here and there and at game and for fun at full soda cans, any time I get a chance and on Sundays ofter church in the spring and summer sometimes on my way home from work and Christmas day hey wait I think I did ascertain the reliability of my rifles never mind
Post a Comment
Dave you are the only thing that keeps me coming back to this site.
Back in the day, in a galaxy far, far away, we just about wore out our weapons shooting and training. Put a couple thousand rounds through a CAR-15 and you know it works. I have two handguns that have had literaly thousands of rounds fired through them; a Browning Hi-Power and a Smith & Wesson Model 19 Combat Magnum. Now those guns are not the newest high tech tacti-cool polymer whiz bangs with picatinny rails everywhere, but I can gar-on-tee you that they will go BANG every time they are cycled. I can't think of any hunting rifle of mine that has not had well over a hundred rounds fired through it by me, except my latest acquisition which has only had 50 or so rounds through it. But it probably will have 40-50 more before the elk opener.....
Stomped, et, fundaments,abulia,paresis, wain ropes(?). Stealing a line from Larry the Cable Guy "I don't care who you are, that's good stuff".
That .458 Lott rifle reminds me of a .44 Magnum revolver I once saw for sale with 48 rounds of ammo. The owner had decided that enough was more than enough.
Safado,
That's is how mine came. Not a scratch nor streak of copper nor a mark of brass on the bolt face! Not even a trace of a sling swivel in the lugs. I didn't get the half box of shells, however. 50% of retail is a good deal! The girlie-men should learn to handload the hard kickers down to 30-06 or 7mm Rem levels instead of getting rid of a good rifle! Is "Man-Up" one word or two?
Dave, that was a good one. Glad I checked back in here today. IMO shooting practice is like smooching with the wife you can't overdo it.
Back when the Danube was blue, at Abercrombie's in New York, or at Pachmeyer's, or at Kerr's in Los Angeles it was not unusual to find large caliber fancy custom rifles for sale with few, and indeed sometimes no rounds fired through them. My hunch is that wealthy fellows over a few too many cocktails enthusiastically planned African safaris and accordingly ordered up fancy big caliber rifles and terai hats. Later trips could afford to be canceled or a few rounds fired at a range cooled their ardor for teeth jarring recoil they had never experienced, steering them toward rifles with recoil of friendlier persuasion.
A followup on my earlier message. My first 416 Rigby was such a rifle crafted by Griffen & Howe. It had never been fired, and was one of a set of three rifles, a 300 H & H, a 375 H & H , and the 416. I could not afford all three, but Frank Pachmeyer was willing to sell me the 416 separately from the other two. Several decades later after hard use and exciting adventure it is battered but still unbeaten. I would not trade it for anything.
Safado, the 375 I mentioned that acquired a recoil caused split behind the tang was still accurate after the split was mended. The Sako stock was just a little light for my fancy.
Sorry am weighing in late on this topic, have been in and out of the hospital the past couple months, and just noticed this topic. Kindest Regards
To Beekeeper: Thank you, but that is a heavy burden you lay on me.
I think a lot of people think like you as when I go to the range I see many people firing over a 200-300 rounds per outing per weapon and they wonder why shooters buy large quantities of ammo. I shocked n acquaintance at a dinner when being questioned about my gun "nuttiness" I mentioned I go thru 2-3000 rounds of ammo a year.
Last season, I pulled my Semi custom O3-A3 out of mothballs and after shooting so many production guns I forgot what it feels to hold a fully functional trust worthy beauty again. It was like first love all over again!
Perhaps the gentleman realized the nightmare of the .416 Lott after only 5 rounds?
I don't have or need a .375 H&H nor a .300 H&H, but would like to have one if the price were right! Classic rifles to be sure! Need? I did not "need" another rifle when I only had a .308 and a .35 Whelen! Everything else is a sign of self-indulgence and materialism on my part.
Comprehension of the written word is a glorious thing!
Thanks Mr. Petzal for a good column today. No only did I laugh a bit, I also added a couple of new words to my vocabulary.
So many guns, so little time. Love your last five-lines, DP.
I settled on a custom Mauser 35 Whelen...willed to my son, then a 1903 Springfield [replacement for the Mauser] and a Winchester 70 in 458.
Dr. Petzal;
This is exactly why I usually show up in deer camp with my old Savage 338 as the primary or backup gun.
I know it works every time.
I know where it hits.
I know it like a part of my body.
I know it's a lot for mule deer, and I take a lot of grief, but I don't miss too often and don't track wounded game too often either.
As much as I try to get away from it, I always come back to it.
Just my two cents worth.
AKX
Who all chambers a rifle for the .478 Thunderf***er these days?
I had no idea Fundament was a real word. Had to look it up! But my Grand Pop often spoke of courting my Grandmother (he called her the "old gray heifer") in a convertible - a Wain pulled by 2 jennies. He would always laugh when us grand kids had such dumb looks on our faces.... "What's a wain?"
The hands always went to her hips in fists when she heard that heifer comment.
Fundament. Heh! I haven't heard that one in a while. But you're right. A rifle that won't work is useless.
Vehicle,
The previous article was about how accurate a rifle may or may not be. This is about making sure the thing will feed, fire, and eject every time.
Dave, your command of the language is a very rare commodity among outdoor writers and likely most, if not all, college english professors. You have expressed no desire to write another book, but will you give serious consideration to recording some of your adventures and mis-adventures on CD's?
as always,mr petzal is extremely entertaining and erudite as well. keep fighting the good fight d.p. and we'll keep reading.
I am a avid reader of Field and Stream and I visit this site dozens of times per week and I always go straight to you first Mr. Petzal...I am a gun nut to the core and you provide honest insight with no frills and that is how is should be...I only wish I had become a F&S reader years prior to 2005, I am certain I missed some valuable lessons.
Deer are never going to be confused with dangerous game, but I have a new custom rifle that I've put over 70 rounds through and I believe the barrel is fire-lapped now. The accuracy on this rifle is good as load work up has been an education as well as fun. There are four different loads that produce 1" or smaller groups. I think about the time I hit the 90-100 rounds I'll have everything ready for this rifle to take to the field.
Hope is not a plan, and it reads like the owner of the five-shot wonder is in for a surprise (or a shock) when he gets into the field with his new rifle. I would fire it at least five times to work out any possible quirks that have developed since the rifle left home and got to the safari location.
To Clay Cooper:
I know just how you fell. I take my Model 99 Savage out every time I go to the range. I haven't carried it in the field for nearly a decade, but she shoots and shoots very straight out to 200 yards. I have loved that rifle ever since I first saw my Mom carry it deer hunting a half century ago. Dark blue steel and dark, almost black walnut. It is a thing of beauty and just feels right.
I think if I get drawn for deer or elk next year I will tune her up and carry my old friend that puts meat in the freezer. Thanks for getting me thinking.
I have rifles ranging from .177 all the way up to the mighty 50 and couldnt agree more. Familiarity is key. David is the reason I started dabbling in outdoor writing and has officially got me interested in aquiring a .478 Thunderf***er
I bet you won't find factory ammo for the .478 Thunderf****er in every mom and pop store so don't forget yours when traveling on that DG hunt. Mr Petzal sir, you are a treasure. I love this blog and am upset when you take a day off.
Aboulia or Abulia (from the Greek "αβουλία", meaning "un-will"), in neurology, refers to a lack of will or initiative and is one of the Disorders of Diminished Motivation or DDM. Aboulia falls in the middle of the spectrum of diminished motivation, with apathy being less extreme and akinetic mutism being more extreme than aboulia.
Why do I always have to look things up when I come to this site? Dave for president.
One can only assume the user took his lion, leopard, elephant, rhino and buff with the first five shots...
When buying a big bore rifle I am never overly concerned regarding the prior use of the rifle unless something is blatantly evident. A varmint gun is an entirely different matter as it usually has been fired many many times by the owner. The same holds true for used trap guns, normally lots of wear. Actually my favorite .416, an older Sako, is fired 100 times or so a year then only for reducing boulders into rocks which I understand is in violation of the BLM per some folks.
DEP off topic but of interest since you recently gave rave reviews of the Ruger American. Cabela's in Billings, MT has them on sale in all chamberings for $339.00.
Fundament!! HAHAHAHA...... That is a classic word of Old English.
To Vehicle
I think your are comparing apples to oranges. Your average joe schmoe who has humpteen rifles in his battery has probably shot rifles long enough to know what to take out for your average deer, elk, etc. If you happen to be one of the relatively few who goes after game that can:
A. Trounce on your body until it is a corpse
B. Swat at you with a paw that can take your head off
C. Can bite you enough to kill and eat you
One should be darn sure your rifle will perform flawlessly or just as importantly YOU perform flawlessly with your rifle which kick more than the proverbial mule. As my ol' football coach use to say, Practice doesn't make perfect, Perfect practice makes perfect.
Vehicle,
I take exception that you can kill someone better with a .22 than a .375. I can kill a large animal with one shot with a .22 if I get a good hit in the lungs. The problem is how LONG IT TAKES TO DIE. Various mischief can occur until till it expires. That is the point Dave is trying to make. If I misfire my old .270 on a buck, I can count on some ribbing from my buddies. If my H&H express rifle misfires on a charging bull elephant or a poorly hit lion, what is left of me comes home in a box.
On a side note look up Gen. Hatchers study on the ballistics of a .45 Colt pistol round vs a .38 Long Colt. Hence the development of the .45ACP to deal with drug crazed radical Muslim insurgents. Funny how physics of the early 20th Century still applies to the 21st Century.
Who all chambers a rifle for the .478 Thunderf***er these days?
Dave.....
Love this article but a little confused...
Your words taken directly from previous Article Best of the Best.......
But for something like Best of the Best, where I have perhaps 10 or a dozen rifles to shoot and not a lot of time in which to do it, it’s senseless to pour ammunition through them when you can see, right up front, whether they’re any good or not.
(you shot 9 rounds per gun if memory serves)
Now you post in this article .....
If you are going to mix it up with an animal whose idea of a good time is ramming a horn up your fundament, it’s highly recommended that you be sure your rifle functions, and you can’t make sure of this in five shots. Fifty is a good start.
So as top dog at F&S for firearms.... Which is it?...... Article 1 or Article 2
I have alot of respect for your knowledge of firearms and have learned from reading your articles.
However you are delivering two very diff messages here. Could you please clear up your position?
Any Firearm can kill... so they ALL should be treated with the same respect and attention to detail with time not being a factor ....
Let the howls of discord and calls for off with his head begin... I am a big boy I can take it.
To Buckstopper,
The point I am trying to get across is this.... A .22 will kill you just as dead as a .375 the rifle/ammo is not the issue.
I am trying to understand the difference that arise between David's articles in regards to rounds fired to reach the goal.
Dave, if you are truely our friend you would disclose the junky 50% rifles you have owned. Billy be damned the advertising. If it's junk I want to know about it !
Your writing is always a pleasure DP. Your prose reminds me of the work of a columnist with the SF Chronicle - Charles McCabe - back in the 60s-70s. Always had a smart, satirical view of the world. Upon his retirement, he asked the paper to replace his column with that of another writer at the paper. This other writer was mediocre, on his best days. McCabe insured that he would be missed...
forgive me for I have sinned. I have never had the opportunity or the funds to hunt the big toothy claw carrying beasts or the enormous horned or tusked fauna. My chances at being eaten by a vicious animal and defecated off a cliff is nil.I fear I shall never see Africa or Alaska. My lot is cast cruel fate has forced me to hunt the various deer species in north America.My one dangerous beast to hunt is the wild hog and Tennessee has seen fit to close that season sad indeed.
therefore I have only seen fit to shoot my rifles to sight them in, practice a bit here and there and at game and for fun at full soda cans, any time I get a chance and on Sundays ofter church in the spring and summer sometimes on my way home from work and Christmas day hey wait I think I did ascertain the reliability of my rifles never mind
I have handled several "Used" Weatherby's in 300 Weatherby and above at the local gun store that are new in the box with a box of shells with 14 cartridges left. Someone buys these things because they have to have one take it to the range and can't handle the recoil.
Tootall75-Off topic,but I have been going through the Gun Nuts archives for the last week or so and there are so many pearls of wisdom that I definitely recommend you read some of the old articles if you can.
Dave,
Maybe a good future post would be PHs/Guides/Outfitters and the guns that they carry in North America contrasted or compared with Africa.
WAM,
Amen brother, Here's to the girly men. There is a beautiful semi custom Sako in .375 H & H sitting in the store calling to me now. It's immaculate only has a couple of issues. I don't really need a 375 H & H, but what does need ever have to do with a gun purchase? It has a muzzle brake and it's left handed. The left handed part is not a real problem because although I'm right handed I'm left eye dominant. Decisions...decisions!
I just read a post from a few years ago from Happy Myles. It appears the stock broke in his Sako in .375 H & H. The one I have been handling struck me as light for a .375 but it points so well!!! The bore is bright and shiny the wood is immaculate. It's probably 30 years old at least.
@ Tony C: I do believe the 478 Thunderf****r is custom made by a well-known chap by the name of Alfred E. Neuman.
@Buckstopper: As a former peace-officer, I must take exception to your first sentence regarding a .22. If you shoot someone, as your sentence states, in the head, the .22 will kill just as surely and as quickly as a .375. Stated from experience as an eye-witness.
Mr. Petzal,
I have only one thing to say to you, sir … if you keep on drinking rum, the world will soon be quit of a very dirty scoundrel!
Post a Comment