



February 15, 2013
Shotgun Stocks: Wood vs. Plastic
By Phil Bourjaily

The first time I saw a shotgun with a black plastic stock I was horrified by its sheer ugliness. That was back in the mid-90s and the gun was a Benelli Super Black Eagle belonging to Buck Gardner, who had won it in the World Duck Calling Championship.
I would never have bought a black stocked gun, as I believed then that shotgun stocks should be made of wood, but a year or so later I got my first black shotgun. It was a Winchester Super X2, which Winchester gave out to all the writers on the trip to North Dakota I wrote about in “My Higher Calling.”
Now I have a few including one camo dipped turkey gun. Between black and camo I prefer black, which wears better than dip finishes. There is no question synthetic stocks are easy to care for – if you bother caring for them. I don’t wipe the mud and blood off the stock of my 391 until the end of the season. And, I took my X2 pheasant hunting one day, tripped, fell and launched the gun. I know a wood stock would not have survived but all I had to do was dust off the X2 and go on my way. I also dropped a Benelli Nova on some rip rap once. It bounced and clattered but except for a couple of little dents in the stock it was fine. So plastic – excuse me, “synthetic” – has its advantages. And, I can let my sons shoot my synthetic stocked Berettas and be sure they will come back un-dinged.
Honestly, though, except for duck hunting – and I mean the pack in decoys, wallow in the mud kind, not the genteel sit in a permanent blind kind – there’s not much reason to have a plastic stocked gun. They are ugly, they are harder to cut to length and impossible to bend. Walnut looks better and with the right finish it neither glares nor does it get those white scars when you scratch it in the field. For my newest enthusiasm of dove and field goose hunting, there is no reason not to shoot guns with wood stocks although I have been doing both with that black 391. Besides, walnut adds aesthetic appeal to the hunt and I think – this is a goofy thought, I know -- it shows some respect for the birds. I have shot some pheasants with plastic stocked guns but I dislike doing so. I believe upland birds generally prefer to be killed with good looking guns.
Of course this whole train of thought is an attempt to rationalize the purchase of a couple of wood-stocked goose guns that have been tempting me at my local stores. It is the off-season right now and there is no hunting to be done, so I look at used guns a lot and try to justify their addition to my collection.* There’s an old 3 ½-inch 12 gauge BPS built on a 10 gauge frame at one, and a very nice old 3-inch Model 12 that has been tempting me at my local sporting goods store. Still, I am not getting rid of my plastic stocked guns but I would like to add these.
* “collection” is not the right word. I have an “accumulation” of guns.
Comments (48)
I like wood stocks better.
If you are talking about walnut stocks with a good quality finish, I agree. Walnut stocks are much better looking than any plastic stock. And scratches only add "character" to the firearm.
But...in many cases the "wood" that is put on many shotguns is birch stained to look like walnut or stocks made of laminate and both types are usually poorly finished and look like h*ll after a short time.
In that case.....give me plastic.....
Plastic is pretty tough to tweak to owner-shooter quirks.
In the cases (duck hunting, 3-gun, tactical, military) where a shotgun is a tool used to execute a task or achieve an objective, then plastic makes the most sense. It is the most cost-efficient and task-effective material available to meet the objective.
On the other hand, when one wishes to transcend from solely accomplishing a task into something beautiful, plastic falls short of that transcendence.
Walnut stocked shotguns, particularly those with excellent bluing, fine hand checkering, well excecuted engraving, a bespoke fit, and personal or sentimental family history.... these are the guns that we "collect", not just "accumulate".
I hunt too hard for wood, especially good looking wood, no matter if I am in the field hunting geese or walking ditches after pheasants. I hunt in all kinds of weather and nothing puts up with that like synthetic black. I am EXTREMELY interested in that synthetic stock on the Mossberg that Phil reviewed a while back. It has lots of adjustment to it. That seems to be one advantage synthetic always COULD have had over wood - ability to integrate some adjustment mechanism. I wonder why it's taken so long to grasp that potential and why it was some low-life gunmaker who capitalized on it. Must be a story in there.
I prefer wood for targets and dove, but anytime i get near mud, thorns and barbed wire, i carry synthetic. All my guns must have a magnetic pull toward those things because no matter how hard I try to aviod it, my gun always ends up with more "character", as jjas said, than I'd like.
I've tried to warm up to plastic stocks, particularly when thinking about a home-defense shotgun - I can see the advantages of a rugged, who-cares-about-it stock when hunting gets nasty or for knocking about the home or riding in a truck - but they always leave me cold. Ugly and devoid of character, plastic guns hold no real interest for me. I also don't like the feel of them. I much prefer a quality laminated stock if I need something that rugged. A nicely checkered, nicely figured walnut (particularly on a gun with a high-polish bluing) is what gets my heart pounding, but even straight-grained walnut has a warmth, beauty, and feel that just seems to vanquish plastic guns from consideration. My $$ always seem to follow walnut.
I don't like the look of plastic stocks. However I fell last year with my Beretta 390 and just about destroyed the fore arm. The 390 now sports a synthetic stock with the beautiful wood stock in the gun cabinet. I purchased a Remington 700 BDL LH, it came with a wood stock and a synthetic stock. In the gun safe it wears wood, in the field it's synthetic.
Good post Phil. Wood has character. A wood stock is made from something that was once alive, the same as you and the birds.
Synthetic stocks are made from chemicals, which at one time may or may not have been alive. They have never had character and remain without a soul.
I shoot Mod 12s that I've owned for decades. I find it really hard to belive that guys aren't going to be able to buy plastic stocked guns cheaply in the future. I've bought an Ithaca for $50 and I suspect that in this new world that many guns are going to get cheap fast. There is always going to be a new groovy gun and a groovy guy to buy it. Me, my dog is going to be fetching the birds that my $50 pump gun has toasted. I suspect that buying a good Lab is going to be way more expensive than buying a servicable shotgun that will last 100 years or so.
Yeah, Phil those black stocks are surely ugly but they just about indestructable. I do not have any shotguns with synthetic stocks but both of my slugguns have them. Weight is one of the reasons for the synthetics on those guns. also they are impervious to the elements. I too like the glow of fine wood stocks and would not trade any of the ones I have. Nothing like the soft glint of the sun coming from fine walnut
Wood all the way
Asian dating --You around each day so sweet . www.lilydating.com
I don't know abut ducks, but I am convinced that pheasants prefer to be killed with good-looking walnut-stocked guns.
i like black for water, however my side by side is wood as is my grouse 20g. so a mix maybe?
Thanks Lang, I think it's sweet that you're around everyday too.
And Phil, you forgot to mention how synthetic stocks are lighter. I own one wooden shotgun and its above the fireplace.
Ive got plenty of plastic stock guns. Mostly just because they are easier on the pocket book. But I will admit that. I know some casual deer hunters who will try to justify their buying a deer rifle with a plastic stock because they dont have to worry about scratching it up. Im like c'mon you only have it out in the woods 4 or 5 times a year. Any how I like to blued steel and walnut stock, I have several like that. But I like it so much I dont want to take it waterfowl hunting with me. Needless to say Im pretty hard on gear.
Both types of stocks have their uses...and places. I have both and definitely prefer the aesthetics of wood. But wood must be taken care of. I live in FLA and rain is often an issue. I love my 11-87 turkey special in part because I beieve the camo helps and spring showers are an ever present hazard in many areas of the country (actually, that is our dry season). Not to mention it's lighter so I can haul it over hill and dale...and swamp. My .270 700 BDL is black and I made the right choice there. I won an A-Bolt .300 WSM and was disappointed to see that someone had left a big gash in an otherwise beautiful walnut stock when they put it back on the display table at the sportsmen's banguet. Still shoots great, though. All of my upland guns are wood. Had to borrow back a black 11-87 I gave my brother-in-law for Christmas when I went on a goose/sandhill hunt in TX. It got so muddy I had to clean it 3X to make it presentable to return it. Good thing is wasn't wood.
All my shotguns are wood stocked. But I quit buying shotguns when the synthetics were just getting started. I have four that I am still devoted to. Buying shotguns can become a problem. Ask my wife!
I suppose I'm blessed more than I know since my wife came from a hunting family. When I went to purchase my first auto loading shotgun, her only comment was that I should get wood because it looks nicer and will be more likely to be better taken care of by future generations.
There's pro's and con's with both types of stock, but for me the one thing I don't care for about plastic is that it seems slippery to me. I don't quite get why they when with the color black instead of say a blackish gray color, maybe it had to do with saving some dollars? I don't know.
I only had wood stocks until I broke one on a trip and had no back up (it's amazing what you can repair, temporarily, with duck tape). I replaced it with a synthetic and its now my rain, sleet, rocks, snow, go anywhere choice. You know, the one that I seem to use most of the time these days.
I have two plastic guns,a little .22 rifle and a Baretta Pintail with a rifled barrel.Great guns and good shooters and while I know they serve a purpose,I can't love them, I just can't.
I must tell when a friend found a near mint belgian made A-5 (light 12) for his son, and how the teen (16 I think) said he hated it and really wanted a much cheaper black-stocked pump-gun. It was then that I really knew the world was changing.
With Upland game bird hunting it may be acceptable to hunt with synthetics; but a man aught not be proud of it.
Wood makes a good gun something to be admired. Synthetic makes a gun seem more like a tool; like a pair of pliers with plastic coated handles. I bought a 20 ga. Benelli pump because it had a safety in the proper place like my 122 ga. model 12. Alas that safety is much harder to operate and the pump mechanism feels rougher than the old Daisy pump BB guns. Thank the Lord for "gunbroker.com" where I found a nice Model 12 in 20 gauge.
BUY BOTH PUMPS!!!!
On the other hand, If I ever have to paddle a boat back to the launch with my shotgun, I'm wanting synthetic. I know an old guy who paddled a bass boat a mile back with his crutch. Said he bought a paddle at the first store.
Wood has soul. In the Uplands, there is nothing like it. In a duck blind...I'll save my sweet wood and opt for plastic.
I guess you could say both have their place.
I can see the practicality of plastic shotguns and high tech clothing, etc. for waterfowl. For upland hunting though, walnut stocks, L.L. Bean boots and that ratty old Carhart coat are the way to go. Paper shotgun shells if you really want to do things right.
As for feel, some of the new Benellis have something on the forearms and pistol grip area that actually seems to give you good control.
And, I'm a double-gun guy, but those same Benellis handle better than most of the other autoloaders I've picked up. I actually think I could hit something with an M2.
But I have heard - think it was even on the "Gun Nuts" TV show - that some of these synthetic buttstocks will fill up with water, yaknow, should they be used as paddles or dropped into the drink. I spose if you dropped a wood gun in the water, whatever recesses there were in it would fill up too.
Back in the early 1950's, I purchased my first new firearm, a Stephens 20 gauge side by side through Sears & Roebuck, or Montgomery Ward, don't recall which. When it arrived I was dismayed and crushed to discover it had a plastic stock, which was not mentioned in the catalog. To ease my pain and disappointment my Father consoled me by saying synthetics would be the wave of the future. His attempts to make me feel better were somewhat prophetic.
As I recall the the twenty shot just fine. Kindest Regards
Doubletrigger640, I'm also a SXS guy. However,in the saltmarsh or the swamp you will find me with a Benelli Semi. Not for the 3rd. shell, but because of their dependability and the fact they can be replaced easier and cheaper than a best gun.
The woodstock looks better though the synthetic stock would not scratch as bad as the woodstock does
I don't have a synthetic stocked shotgun. If I need a stock that can take some abuse, I prefer a laminated stock.
All my guns have wood stocks and I plan on keeping it that way.
ha, I got down voted for sharing my plans to not buy any plastic guns. that's hilarious.
I love wood stocks. I think wood looks great with some "character" too. Who cares if it has some scratches? That just means you use it a lot and it has history. Guns aren't meant for looking pretty on mantels and display cases. Go shoot them.
"I believe upland birds generally prefer to be killed with good looking guns."
That should go in a book.
i dont care what your rifle has on it, but dammit a shotgun should have a wood stock!!!!!
Hmmmm. Laminated stock on an upland gun? I don't own anything laminated however my friend back in Montana restocked his little Savage 25-06 deer gun with one last year. Ugh! That thing is now HEAVY. With all this emphasis on having to cut the weight on upland shotguns, I think you guys might have a hard time finding a laminated stock to fit one. And personally I don't think laminated stocks are a huge step up from black plastic in the ugliness department.
i really do not care if you call them plastic or synthetic, or even baked dinosaur goo. the fact of the matter is they are ugly. in my opinion, they make ugly look good. but, they are tough. tougher than most things. drop them. kick it, hit it with a hammer, and they bounce right back. they may even survive being shot. but wood, while having all of its bad habits, looks beautiful. personally, i will buy a synthetic stocked gun when they figure out how to make it look at least decent. i do not need a beauty queen. with extremely fancy wood, and a 12 layer finish. but i do want a gun that looks nice. when they can make an imitation stock look close to a nice new wood stock, then i will buy one. until then, i want wood. not military ugly beat half to death wood, but a nice, sharply checkered finished wood that anyone would be proud to own. the prey i shoot may not care what i have in my hands, but i certainly do. laminate wood is perfectly acceptable, as long as it is done correctly. life is to shot to carry ugly guns. if it was not, hi point pistols would be the most popular pistols on the market. and Yugo cars would still be all over the place. looks matter, in cars, girls, guns, even houses. i certainly will not say never, but right now i will say NO to plastic.
I see the value in both wood and plastic stocks. I have recently gone to wood. My problem with synthetic, most are camo, after 20 years wore out the barrel on my Mossberg 500A and can't find an OFM camo replacement barrel. Shame that my first gun may turn into a frankenstein. New go-to gun is a BPS, blued with wood furniture. Gravity should quit working before I can't find a blued BPS barrel.
I love the warm feel and the natural beauty of a well-figured wood stock, and resisted the idea of synthetics for decades. I still prefer wood, but after spending three days turkey hunting about three years ago during a spring deluge that would have had Noah sending out doves, and subsequently having to refinish the wooden stock on my O/U, I took advantage of the first couple of sales that came along and added a couple of dedicated, turkey hunting black plastic, stocked guns (Maverick 88 pump for me and Weatherby SA-08 youth semi-auto for my wife) to the home arsenal. I still think they're hideously ugly, but they shed water like ducks and I don't break down and weep when they get soaked.
What's the big deal with aesthetics of synthetic stocks?
Go to your local bookstore or library and pick a book on faux finishing. It's easy to paint up nearly anything to look like wood. Just do a little practice on something else, like a toy, before you tackle your actual stock.
I love wood it was hard to look at synthetic but in the field you can't beat the peace of mind that you didn't destroy a good piece of wood.
whatever happened to the old .22 Nylon 66s? Have those stocks withstood the test of time?
Haverodwilltravel,
I'm completely in agreement with you on semiaiutos. I'm not really a snob. I'm highly in favor of things that work. Hunting upland birds, doubles work best for me, but if the weather was real bad, a semiauto - with a synthetic stock - would be cool.
A question: Is it difficult to go from a double to your Benelli and then back the other way? Like I said before, an M2 seems to mount almost like a double. I think the Benelli folks understand balance better than say Remington or Beretta.
Darn-it! Just spilled my beer. I get so interested in this stuff, I forget what I'm doing. Oh well, it's a good excuse to open another.
Changing guns can be a minor problem. I shoot so much with the SXS, there is no problem for me there....however, just before duck season I spend time shooting lots of clays with the Benelli...to get back into the groove.
Post a Comment
I suppose I'm blessed more than I know since my wife came from a hunting family. When I went to purchase my first auto loading shotgun, her only comment was that I should get wood because it looks nicer and will be more likely to be better taken care of by future generations.
If you are talking about walnut stocks with a good quality finish, I agree. Walnut stocks are much better looking than any plastic stock. And scratches only add "character" to the firearm.
But...in many cases the "wood" that is put on many shotguns is birch stained to look like walnut or stocks made of laminate and both types are usually poorly finished and look like h*ll after a short time.
In that case.....give me plastic.....
I hunt too hard for wood, especially good looking wood, no matter if I am in the field hunting geese or walking ditches after pheasants. I hunt in all kinds of weather and nothing puts up with that like synthetic black. I am EXTREMELY interested in that synthetic stock on the Mossberg that Phil reviewed a while back. It has lots of adjustment to it. That seems to be one advantage synthetic always COULD have had over wood - ability to integrate some adjustment mechanism. I wonder why it's taken so long to grasp that potential and why it was some low-life gunmaker who capitalized on it. Must be a story in there.
I prefer wood for targets and dove, but anytime i get near mud, thorns and barbed wire, i carry synthetic. All my guns must have a magnetic pull toward those things because no matter how hard I try to aviod it, my gun always ends up with more "character", as jjas said, than I'd like.
Wood makes a good gun something to be admired. Synthetic makes a gun seem more like a tool; like a pair of pliers with plastic coated handles. I bought a 20 ga. Benelli pump because it had a safety in the proper place like my 122 ga. model 12. Alas that safety is much harder to operate and the pump mechanism feels rougher than the old Daisy pump BB guns. Thank the Lord for "gunbroker.com" where I found a nice Model 12 in 20 gauge.
BUY BOTH PUMPS!!!!
I like wood stocks better.
In the cases (duck hunting, 3-gun, tactical, military) where a shotgun is a tool used to execute a task or achieve an objective, then plastic makes the most sense. It is the most cost-efficient and task-effective material available to meet the objective.
On the other hand, when one wishes to transcend from solely accomplishing a task into something beautiful, plastic falls short of that transcendence.
Walnut stocked shotguns, particularly those with excellent bluing, fine hand checkering, well excecuted engraving, a bespoke fit, and personal or sentimental family history.... these are the guns that we "collect", not just "accumulate".
I've tried to warm up to plastic stocks, particularly when thinking about a home-defense shotgun - I can see the advantages of a rugged, who-cares-about-it stock when hunting gets nasty or for knocking about the home or riding in a truck - but they always leave me cold. Ugly and devoid of character, plastic guns hold no real interest for me. I also don't like the feel of them. I much prefer a quality laminated stock if I need something that rugged. A nicely checkered, nicely figured walnut (particularly on a gun with a high-polish bluing) is what gets my heart pounding, but even straight-grained walnut has a warmth, beauty, and feel that just seems to vanquish plastic guns from consideration. My $$ always seem to follow walnut.
I don't like the look of plastic stocks. However I fell last year with my Beretta 390 and just about destroyed the fore arm. The 390 now sports a synthetic stock with the beautiful wood stock in the gun cabinet. I purchased a Remington 700 BDL LH, it came with a wood stock and a synthetic stock. In the gun safe it wears wood, in the field it's synthetic.
Yeah, Phil those black stocks are surely ugly but they just about indestructable. I do not have any shotguns with synthetic stocks but both of my slugguns have them. Weight is one of the reasons for the synthetics on those guns. also they are impervious to the elements. I too like the glow of fine wood stocks and would not trade any of the ones I have. Nothing like the soft glint of the sun coming from fine walnut
Wood all the way
I don't know abut ducks, but I am convinced that pheasants prefer to be killed with good-looking walnut-stocked guns.
i like black for water, however my side by side is wood as is my grouse 20g. so a mix maybe?
Thanks Lang, I think it's sweet that you're around everyday too.
And Phil, you forgot to mention how synthetic stocks are lighter. I own one wooden shotgun and its above the fireplace.
Ive got plenty of plastic stock guns. Mostly just because they are easier on the pocket book. But I will admit that. I know some casual deer hunters who will try to justify their buying a deer rifle with a plastic stock because they dont have to worry about scratching it up. Im like c'mon you only have it out in the woods 4 or 5 times a year. Any how I like to blued steel and walnut stock, I have several like that. But I like it so much I dont want to take it waterfowl hunting with me. Needless to say Im pretty hard on gear.
Both types of stocks have their uses...and places. I have both and definitely prefer the aesthetics of wood. But wood must be taken care of. I live in FLA and rain is often an issue. I love my 11-87 turkey special in part because I beieve the camo helps and spring showers are an ever present hazard in many areas of the country (actually, that is our dry season). Not to mention it's lighter so I can haul it over hill and dale...and swamp. My .270 700 BDL is black and I made the right choice there. I won an A-Bolt .300 WSM and was disappointed to see that someone had left a big gash in an otherwise beautiful walnut stock when they put it back on the display table at the sportsmen's banguet. Still shoots great, though. All of my upland guns are wood. Had to borrow back a black 11-87 I gave my brother-in-law for Christmas when I went on a goose/sandhill hunt in TX. It got so muddy I had to clean it 3X to make it presentable to return it. Good thing is wasn't wood.
All my shotguns are wood stocked. But I quit buying shotguns when the synthetics were just getting started. I have four that I am still devoted to. Buying shotguns can become a problem. Ask my wife!
There's pro's and con's with both types of stock, but for me the one thing I don't care for about plastic is that it seems slippery to me. I don't quite get why they when with the color black instead of say a blackish gray color, maybe it had to do with saving some dollars? I don't know.
I only had wood stocks until I broke one on a trip and had no back up (it's amazing what you can repair, temporarily, with duck tape). I replaced it with a synthetic and its now my rain, sleet, rocks, snow, go anywhere choice. You know, the one that I seem to use most of the time these days.
With Upland game bird hunting it may be acceptable to hunt with synthetics; but a man aught not be proud of it.
Wood has soul. In the Uplands, there is nothing like it. In a duck blind...I'll save my sweet wood and opt for plastic.
I guess you could say both have their place.
Back in the early 1950's, I purchased my first new firearm, a Stephens 20 gauge side by side through Sears & Roebuck, or Montgomery Ward, don't recall which. When it arrived I was dismayed and crushed to discover it had a plastic stock, which was not mentioned in the catalog. To ease my pain and disappointment my Father consoled me by saying synthetics would be the wave of the future. His attempts to make me feel better were somewhat prophetic.
As I recall the the twenty shot just fine. Kindest Regards
Doubletrigger640, I'm also a SXS guy. However,in the saltmarsh or the swamp you will find me with a Benelli Semi. Not for the 3rd. shell, but because of their dependability and the fact they can be replaced easier and cheaper than a best gun.
All my guns have wood stocks and I plan on keeping it that way.
ha, I got down voted for sharing my plans to not buy any plastic guns. that's hilarious.
i dont care what your rifle has on it, but dammit a shotgun should have a wood stock!!!!!
I love the warm feel and the natural beauty of a well-figured wood stock, and resisted the idea of synthetics for decades. I still prefer wood, but after spending three days turkey hunting about three years ago during a spring deluge that would have had Noah sending out doves, and subsequently having to refinish the wooden stock on my O/U, I took advantage of the first couple of sales that came along and added a couple of dedicated, turkey hunting black plastic, stocked guns (Maverick 88 pump for me and Weatherby SA-08 youth semi-auto for my wife) to the home arsenal. I still think they're hideously ugly, but they shed water like ducks and I don't break down and weep when they get soaked.
What's the big deal with aesthetics of synthetic stocks?
Go to your local bookstore or library and pick a book on faux finishing. It's easy to paint up nearly anything to look like wood. Just do a little practice on something else, like a toy, before you tackle your actual stock.
Plastic is pretty tough to tweak to owner-shooter quirks.
Good post Phil. Wood has character. A wood stock is made from something that was once alive, the same as you and the birds.
Synthetic stocks are made from chemicals, which at one time may or may not have been alive. They have never had character and remain without a soul.
I shoot Mod 12s that I've owned for decades. I find it really hard to belive that guys aren't going to be able to buy plastic stocked guns cheaply in the future. I've bought an Ithaca for $50 and I suspect that in this new world that many guns are going to get cheap fast. There is always going to be a new groovy gun and a groovy guy to buy it. Me, my dog is going to be fetching the birds that my $50 pump gun has toasted. I suspect that buying a good Lab is going to be way more expensive than buying a servicable shotgun that will last 100 years or so.
I have two plastic guns,a little .22 rifle and a Baretta Pintail with a rifled barrel.Great guns and good shooters and while I know they serve a purpose,I can't love them, I just can't.
I must tell when a friend found a near mint belgian made A-5 (light 12) for his son, and how the teen (16 I think) said he hated it and really wanted a much cheaper black-stocked pump-gun. It was then that I really knew the world was changing.
On the other hand, If I ever have to paddle a boat back to the launch with my shotgun, I'm wanting synthetic. I know an old guy who paddled a bass boat a mile back with his crutch. Said he bought a paddle at the first store.
I can see the practicality of plastic shotguns and high tech clothing, etc. for waterfowl. For upland hunting though, walnut stocks, L.L. Bean boots and that ratty old Carhart coat are the way to go. Paper shotgun shells if you really want to do things right.
As for feel, some of the new Benellis have something on the forearms and pistol grip area that actually seems to give you good control.
And, I'm a double-gun guy, but those same Benellis handle better than most of the other autoloaders I've picked up. I actually think I could hit something with an M2.
But I have heard - think it was even on the "Gun Nuts" TV show - that some of these synthetic buttstocks will fill up with water, yaknow, should they be used as paddles or dropped into the drink. I spose if you dropped a wood gun in the water, whatever recesses there were in it would fill up too.
The woodstock looks better though the synthetic stock would not scratch as bad as the woodstock does
I don't have a synthetic stocked shotgun. If I need a stock that can take some abuse, I prefer a laminated stock.
I love wood stocks. I think wood looks great with some "character" too. Who cares if it has some scratches? That just means you use it a lot and it has history. Guns aren't meant for looking pretty on mantels and display cases. Go shoot them.
"I believe upland birds generally prefer to be killed with good looking guns."
That should go in a book.
Hmmmm. Laminated stock on an upland gun? I don't own anything laminated however my friend back in Montana restocked his little Savage 25-06 deer gun with one last year. Ugh! That thing is now HEAVY. With all this emphasis on having to cut the weight on upland shotguns, I think you guys might have a hard time finding a laminated stock to fit one. And personally I don't think laminated stocks are a huge step up from black plastic in the ugliness department.
i really do not care if you call them plastic or synthetic, or even baked dinosaur goo. the fact of the matter is they are ugly. in my opinion, they make ugly look good. but, they are tough. tougher than most things. drop them. kick it, hit it with a hammer, and they bounce right back. they may even survive being shot. but wood, while having all of its bad habits, looks beautiful. personally, i will buy a synthetic stocked gun when they figure out how to make it look at least decent. i do not need a beauty queen. with extremely fancy wood, and a 12 layer finish. but i do want a gun that looks nice. when they can make an imitation stock look close to a nice new wood stock, then i will buy one. until then, i want wood. not military ugly beat half to death wood, but a nice, sharply checkered finished wood that anyone would be proud to own. the prey i shoot may not care what i have in my hands, but i certainly do. laminate wood is perfectly acceptable, as long as it is done correctly. life is to shot to carry ugly guns. if it was not, hi point pistols would be the most popular pistols on the market. and Yugo cars would still be all over the place. looks matter, in cars, girls, guns, even houses. i certainly will not say never, but right now i will say NO to plastic.
I see the value in both wood and plastic stocks. I have recently gone to wood. My problem with synthetic, most are camo, after 20 years wore out the barrel on my Mossberg 500A and can't find an OFM camo replacement barrel. Shame that my first gun may turn into a frankenstein. New go-to gun is a BPS, blued with wood furniture. Gravity should quit working before I can't find a blued BPS barrel.
I love wood it was hard to look at synthetic but in the field you can't beat the peace of mind that you didn't destroy a good piece of wood.
whatever happened to the old .22 Nylon 66s? Have those stocks withstood the test of time?
Haverodwilltravel,
I'm completely in agreement with you on semiaiutos. I'm not really a snob. I'm highly in favor of things that work. Hunting upland birds, doubles work best for me, but if the weather was real bad, a semiauto - with a synthetic stock - would be cool.
A question: Is it difficult to go from a double to your Benelli and then back the other way? Like I said before, an M2 seems to mount almost like a double. I think the Benelli folks understand balance better than say Remington or Beretta.
Darn-it! Just spilled my beer. I get so interested in this stuff, I forget what I'm doing. Oh well, it's a good excuse to open another.
Changing guns can be a minor problem. I shoot so much with the SXS, there is no problem for me there....however, just before duck season I spend time shooting lots of clays with the Benelli...to get back into the groove.
Asian dating --You around each day so sweet . www.lilydating.com
Post a Comment