Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Outdoor Writing: The Whole Truth

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

May 07, 2013

Outdoor Writing: The Whole Truth

By David E. Petzal

In my post of April 29, Happy Myles pointed out that African PH Alexander Lake, whose books I recommended, may have been a little creative with his facts. This is quite possible. Peter Barrett, who was Field & Stream’s Executive Editor and an experienced Africa hand, said the same thing. “Lake drew a long bow,” was how Peter put it.

I think that Lake was a typical writer of his time, not an exception. Having read just about all the bound volumes of Outdoor Life, Field & Stream, and Sports Afield that F&S used to have in its library, going all the way back to the First World War, I think that outdoor writing is a lot more honest now.

There are several reasons. Fifty years ago and more, people expected a certain amount of BS in their yarns. If you look at the number of mens’ “real adventure” magazines that were around in the 40s and 50s and 60s, and which were pure nonsense, it could not be otherwise. This extended into hunting and fishing as well. If an Alaska guide wrote that his client killed a Dall sheep at 600 yards with a single shot from a .250 Savage with a tang sight, people were inclined to believe it, because how many of them had been to Alaska, or seen a Dall sheep, or made a 600-yard shot?

Years ago, a now-deceased gun writer who was a fine amateur boxer in college before World War II and served in the Marines during The Last War We Won told me that he had sparred with Joe Louis when Louis was touring military camps in the Pacific, and how Louis had knocked him out with a jab. It was a great story, except that long after I heard it, a boxing historian pointed out that Louis had not toured Asia until years after the war was over. Today if I heard that tale, I could check up on it in a matter of seconds, which in fact I just did.

These days we’re far less tolerant of being lied to about anything, for any reason, no matter how innocuous, because we’re lied to all the time about everything. When was the last time someone from the government, or from a corporation, or the military, or from the news media, said something and you flat-out believed it?

Truth is pretty much necessary in outdoor writing because travel is so easy, and because so many people have been so many places, and because there is so much information on everything. If you make things up people will catch you at it, and you will have to do something else to make money.

Also, Field & Stream readers in particular seem to be unusually alert (as well as good looking, well educated, highly skillful, and well bred) and do not let mistakes go by. I take a certain perverse pride that in the 30-plus years I’ve been writing regularly for the magazine I have yet to make a single error that was not caught. If you know they’ll nail you every time, you tend to be careful whether you want to or not.

Comments (63)

Top Rated
All Comments
from duckcreekdick wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

You have to admit those earlier writers got the attention of wide-eyed 13 yr. olds, like me. Russell Annabel made me want to hit the high trail to Alaska and become a trapper. The 1984 Jack O'Connor book "The Last Book- Confessions of a Gun Editor" goes into more detail about what Mr. Petzal talks about here.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from The_UTP wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

It's fascinating that so-called "reality" TV isn't held to nearly the same standard. To watch those hunting shows you'd think every outing involves 20 minutes of light walking, some whispering into the camera, a boom and a dead thing and then whoops and hollers.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Dave: Joe Louis sighned up for the Army in 1942 and did box while he was in the service. Is it possible that the gun writer had met him during that period of time? Just a thought as I will readily admit that I do not know where he was stationed. Joe was a true American, courageous, humble and a great fighter. It would have indeed been a priviledge to spar with him.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntslow wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DEP - In keeping with the "catching the errors" (or at least the history), you state in the latest issue of the F&S magazine that you pay no attention to sectional density. It seems that you have before sung the praises of various 6.5 cartridges, especially when they are launching the 156 grain Oryx bullet with it's high SD. May I also remind you of Megan Fox and Rosie O'Donnell?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Douglas wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

You writers for this magazine exhibit an uncommon level of truthful journalism. That's why I waste so much time on this site. I learn something new all the time here.
As for my favorite lie.. "I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Amflyer wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DEP, are you talking Jeff Cooper here?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

@huntslow - how dare you mention Megan Fox and the queen of sectional density in the same sentence? that's just sick...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve in Virginia wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Actually, this post would have been much more interesting had it included a picture of Megan Fox...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Megan Fox and Rosie O"Donnell in the same sentence is OK, because it is making the comparison between heaven and hell.
As to the internet,and truth, so much is taken as gospel without being checked out. I think for some, it is sear volume, too much information at one moment of time. For others, it is that they do not want to know the truth, so they will just believe the cr@p they are fed without question.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Douglas, Have you read an article by Bob Marshall? Full of mistruths, half truths, with plenty of BS to fill in the space between what he wants everyone to believe! Then again there are plenty of people here that DP described in his article that just take his words as facts.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom-Tom wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Whatever happened to ethics in print and broadcast journalism? With biased reporting rampant, with special interest viewpoints the norm, was it any wonder people grew more skeptical. When was the last time you saw a "reporter" give you "just the facts" of a story? In my opinion, if you took the combined sense of ethics of some of our larger broadcast networks and newspapers, rolled them into a ball and shoved said ball up the fundament of a gnat, it would rattle like a BB in a boxcar. When an outdoor writer "stretched the truth" or "exagerated" somewhat, was it done to be entertaining? Or was it done to advertise and/or promote a product or service?

When we read stories by Corey Ford or Patrick McManus, we did so to be entertained. When you write an article, Dave, or broadcast a segment on The Gun Nuts, you are educational as well as entertaining. The real problem may be that not everyone was brought up or educated to respect the truth the way you were.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ncarl wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Dcast beat me to it. +1

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MReeder wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

I think Dave hit it on the head when he noted that readers back in the day expected and even desired a little more BS in their outdoor yarns. Tales tended to be a bit more lurid, in keeping with the artwork on the front of the magazines. Call it literary license or style if you wish. You didn't read Ruark for his firearm expertise -- he obviously didn't have much -- but no one ever captured the essence of a hunt or a place or a moment in time as well as RR. O'Connor combined style, knowledge and hard facts better than any other writer of that era, while some of the others stretched credulity to the point of disbelief (Keith leaps instantly to mind). That aside, there's something to be said for a ripping good adventure story as long as you don't take it too seriously. Personally, I always wondered how someone could be so sure that climactic shot across the mountain at the end of their story covered 600-yards, since they didn't have rangefinders and had no way of pacing off the distance across an open chasm...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

these are facts. when i read an article written by David Petzal, i believe it to be true. on the other hand, i have not believed anything that has come from the government since Ronald Regan left office. it is a sad country that can believe the people who write about sports, but can not believe ANYTHING that their government tells them.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SL wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DP said: " When was the last time someone from the government, or from a corporation, or the military, or from the news media, said something and you flat-out believed it?"

Maybe not the government, corporations, military or news, but have the NRA say something and most posters here will cling to it like flies on you know what! LOL

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

To Amflyer: Nope, not Jeff Cooper. That story was told me by a fellow named Bob Zwirz, long departed.

To Huntslow: Are you sure I was referred to SD, and not BC? If so, that is simply a case of failing memory. Permit me do quote Walt Whitman: "Do I contradict myself? So be it. I encompass millions."

To Longhunter: Louis spent his army career fighting exhibitions at Army camps in the U.S., but as far as I know he never went overseas. I believe he is the greatest heavyweight of all time, and the second greatest fighter of all time just behind Sugar Ray Robinson.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

God help me, that should be "I referred," and "to quote."

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom-Tom wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

On your next trip to Washington, DC, make the effort to take the subway to Arlington National Cemetery. After watching the Changing of the Guard, its a short down hill walk to Joe Lewis's burial plot. You can pay your respects; and by the way, the guy buried next to Joe is someone you should remember.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Safado wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dave,
Keep telling the truth and we will keep reading. Other than film I never saw Joe Louis or Sugar Ray Robinson fight but I share your high regard for their fighting ability.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If that don't beat all. Wondered what happened to ol' Bob. He wrote for Gun World? or was it Guns. I met him at the 1979? NRA convention in KCMO. Same day I met Elmer.
Dave, is it Gen. Billy Mitchell? Been there just not sure if I can remember. Arlington is an awesome place full of my heroes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If that don't beat all. Wondered what happened to ol' Bob. He wrote for Gun World? or was it Guns. I met him at the 1979? NRA convention in KCMO. Same day I met Elmer.
Dave, is it Gen. Billy Mitchell? Been there just not sure if I can remember. Arlington is an awesome place full of my heroes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from haverodwilltravel wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

There are Sportsmen who write and then there are Writers who sometimes hunt and fish. In the early days, most outdoor writers could "put up". Many of them worked for this very magazine and still do.
The worst time in outdoor writing took place about 7 to 10 years ago (mostly in the Fly Fishing magazines) when newbies to the sport, fresh out of college wrote "destination" articles for freebie trips...Let's be honest,if someone is picking up the tab, how honest a review can the beneficiary of the trip be in his critique? Hell, they were as obvious in their "River Runs through it" outfits as a City Slicker riding a horse.
I've guided outdoor writers& TV folks on fly fishing trips and bird hunting (not for $$$..only because I was asked)....some were gifted sportsmen, some were gifted writers and some were just fibbers. Some even felt it necessary to embellish to make themselves look like they were Lefty Kreh or Tom Knapp (RIP)...and trust me, they weren't.
IMHO, if you aren't afield or working on your craft over a 100 days a year (or have done so for many years)....you probably shouldn't be writing as an expert.
That said if you really want to know who the good ones are, ask a guide (most times the real expert on the story). Most won't give out any info...unless they've had a few pops. ;)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Unless the writer is talking about a product endorsement or historic event a little poetic license is allowed. As long as the story is within reason and entertaining who cares if the shot is 500 or 700 yards. If anything it will start a debate and sell the writer's next publication. I think most Raconteurs follow the last line of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence "when it comes to printing the truth or the legend, print the legend".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lee Marvin is buried next to Joe Louis Barrow.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tim Platt wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Why was I thinking of Elmer Kieth? I think O'Connor was mainly honest but I do remember him saying something about hitting running deer from around 200 yards.

The greatest was Muhammad Ali. End of discussion.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I was told by a prominent retired journalist over the weekend that writers who wrote the truth were soon unemployed.

Lee Marvin was one hell of an actor. They don't make'm like that anymore.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RandyMI wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I'm so glad you're being truthful but I never suspected any BS..... I'm especially glad that my 'breeding' just finally improved!!! :-)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lee Marvin (actor), Warren Spahn (baseball LHP), Bob Feller (RHP), Ted Williams (the last guy to hit over .400), James Stewart (actor). They all fought in WW2, and by that I mean fought. Maybe not all of them were exposed to gunfire, but that was by sheer luck, they all served in combat assignments. Bob Feller was so angry after Pearl Harbor he enlisted at first opportunity. Jimmy Stewart may look gentle and like he couldn't harm a fly, but he flew bombing sorties over Nazi Germany and was decorated for his service. Ted Williams, after hesitating initially, served his country twice, the 2nd time as a fighter jet jock. There is no prouder, freer American than the Splendid Splinter, and he used that freedom well, he "chose" to serve.

There is another boxing story from WW2. When Tony Zale, who was Zaleski in real life, enlisted in the Navy, the enlisting officer noted that he was a boxer and said you're going to have some company, they say Tony Zale is going to enlist, too, and he's a great, tough fighter. Zale, who shunned the spotlight, must be grinning inside when he heard that.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MReeder wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dr. Ralph,
O'Connor did indeed write about hitting running deer -- and running sheep -- at ranges out to 200 yards and beyond, but he never claimed to hit them every time or make perfect hits. He was one of the few writers I know who would actually say in print that he flat missed four or five times, or hit a little far back but slowed his target down enough to get in a killing shot. Recall he grew up in open desert and canyon country in Arizona and did a lot of hunting in Sonora, Mexico. I used to do a lot of deer hunting in similar country in west Texas and employed some of his same techniques; ie, rolling stones into likely brushy spots from above and seeing what came boiling out of the draw. As long as the backdrop was safe and you'd done enough jackrabbit shooting hitting running deer under those conditions wasn't that big a feat. O'Connor always credited thousands of rounds shot at jackrabbits for any skill he had at hitting running game. Just as woodchucks teach long distance skills, jackrabbits teach you how to hit game on the run. Back in my much younger and dumber days we used to shoot running jacks out of the back of moving pickups; kind of like "Hatari" with shotguns. It was actually one of the more popular, multi-generational pastimes where I grew up in the middle-of-nowhere Texas. Believe it or not you can actually get pretty good at that, too, assuming you live through it...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dr. Ralph,

Muhammad Ali(then still Cassius Clay)'s wide-eyed, loud claim "I must be the greatest!", part of his now famous "I shocked the world" post fight "speech" after stopping Sonny Liston, was essentially mirrored by Mike Tyson after the latter defeated Trevor Berbick. I would chalk it up to exuberance of youth, in both cases. Ali would not become the greatest until the 1970's, when he finally faced fighters his own size who also edged him in power (Ken Norton and Foreman) and still overcame them when nearly all of his 1960's foot speed was gone. When he could no longer backpedal away from punches, he absorbed them.

I agree that Ali was the greatest heavyweight, but maintain that Sugar Ray Robinson was the greatest fighter of all time, regardless of weight division.

As for the "best" heavyweight, Larry Holmes had a stiffer jab than Ali, and not only could Larry block Ali's jab, but he could counter it with a quick right hand that Ali often didn't see coming. And that was when they were still sparring partners, in Ali's early 1970's condition, that is, post-incarceration but before the effects of Parkinson's, so still in good shape. Ali had more charisma and grace, and Holmes often looked like a craftsman next to Ali's artist, but Holmes technically, in my opinion was better.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from kudukid wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

We never got to see a match between Cassius and Teófilo Stevenson. Remember him saying before an Olympics bout that he would knock out his opponent and no one would see the punch.
I watched intently. He knocked the guy out and I never saw the punch.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

To O Garcia: Watch films of the young Joe Louis and you will see a virtually perfect prizefighter, without Ali's flaws. At any rate, here's a Tony Zale story.

In 1955, when the movie Somebody Up There Likes Me (the story of Rocky Graziano) was being filmed, Paul Newman played Graziano, and in the scene where he fights Tony Zale for the middleweight championship, Zale played himself. As they got in the ring, Newman took one look at the expression on Zale's face and said, "F*** this, that guy wants to kill me," and got out of the ring. Finally, the director managed to convince Zale that he didn't have to beat Paul Newman to death, and the show went on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lots of interesting commentary here. Of all the outdoor writers I have been reading since the '30's, when I think of who may have been the prince of invention, Peter Capstick is the first one that comes to mind. I long ago lost count of much that was obviously fiction in his writing, although at the same time I enjoyed his use of the language and found him quite entertaining. O'Connor still gets my vote as the best, and I never had reason to doubt all that he said. 200 yard running shots? I have seen that done by a couple of friends and I have done it a few times myself.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Fight Game: Louis the best. Really showed courage and skill after loosing to The German. Ali IMO was the best tactician and strategist as was shown in his Forman match. Leonard probably best all around boxer in his prime. Still can’t believe he beat Hagler.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jim in nc wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

DP: for an imaginative book on African hunting, I recommend Peter Funkhouser, THE ADVENTURES OF SIR HILLARY RINDERPEST, from Little River Press, in Concord, Mass. He swears every word is true.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I think that Joe Louis was the greatest heavyweight of all time and could have taken Ali prime vs prime. Sugar Ray Robinson thought so and even said that the often over-looked Jersey Joe Walcott would have given him issues. Larry Holmes was another great but never received his due after Alis reign. Sugar Ray Robinson was the best pound for pound and I though that after him Roberto Duran was amazingly talented. Boxing, I am sorry to say seems to have lost much of the charm that it used to have.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If all fishermen are liars, then how could those who extoll them be any different?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from HogBlog wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Hemingway once wrote that, before he turned in for the day, he strove to write, "one true thing."

He went on to explain that "true" didn't mean nailing ever fact to a wall, but that it had to ring true... to capture the inherent truth in the subject so that when the reader reads it, he understands.

When I read Capstick, Ruark, or most of the old-time great outdoor adventure writers, I'm not sure they're always telling the facts... but what made them good was that I always felt like they were telling the truth.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

The old guys knew how to write stories. The new breed mostly writes endorsements. Personally I think it would be terrible to have to write for approval. That would take all the fun out of it. One of the wonderful things about these blogs is contributors can express themselves freely and tell stories like they want them to be heard, not for what is needed to sell. It's too bad the blog editors don't have the same freedom. I think it would be an eye-opener if they did!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Being creative with facts is fine as long as it is well done, and Mr Lake does it well. I assure you I was not complaining. Artistic license is important in writing as well as telling tales around the campfire. I believe it was Ruark who wrote the telling about it was just about as important as the event. In fact it was OK to lie shamelessly afterwards. If it was not for good story telling by others , I would probably have spent my life ball room dancing and playing bridge instead of adventuring around the world.
I would have participated in these comments earlier, but was busy delivering serum by dog sled during a blizzard to Inuits beyond the Arctic circle when my lead dog died. But that's another story.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

To Happy Myles: Delivering serum is a noble enterprise, and I think someone should commemorate the event by creating a sled-dog race and calling it the Iditarod. Think it will fly?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

MReeder- You used SHOTGUNS?? How very unsporting of you. Ducking, jumping, twisting cottontails out of the back of a pickup with .22s is the way to practice. At night, of course. Gotta keep those little rascals in the headlights to get a shot. Anything but head shots is frowned upon, and considered city slicker stuff.
For long range practice, jacks and armadillos out on the mesquite flats just at sundown are the way to go. With a .222. 'Dillers are never still. A few second pause is a long time. Jacks are about the same, but tend to sit for a few seconds after moving. Behind a prickly pear, or mesquite bush, of course.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Jersey Joe Walcott appeared to have underachieved because most of the time he was hungry. Like literally, one meal in a week or something at the worst. Those were hard times, and even harder for black folk, even those with athletic ability, because major league football and baseball were still closed to them, and boxing was the only pro sport where they could play to white audiences. Few invested in him early in his career because he often appeared to be taking it easy. He was merely conserving energy.

Jersey Joe was hired for a week to spar with a young but bright prospect named Joe Louis while the latter prepared to face a German named Max Schmelling, and according to the story, he was fired after he dropped Louis twice. Jersey Joe would recount later that Louis was easy to hit and predicted the German would win. Schmelling knocked Louis out, capitalizing on Louis' tendency to drop his left arm after a jab. To be fair, Joe Louis did win the rematch in less than one round.

When Jersey Joe finally faced Joe Louis in a competitive fight, he so dominated the fight, knocking Louis down twice, that Joe Louis was already on his way down the ring, knowing he'd lost. The judges gave Louis the victory. Again, Louis did better in the rematch, knocking Jersey Joe out.

Jersey Joe was also leading Rocky Marciano until Rocky hit him with that right hand in the 13th, leaving him trapped on the ropes like a fly on a spider's web, according to one sportswriter.

Jersey Joe had hard luck.

George Foreman was never counted out in The Rumble In The Jungle. The fight is on DVD, so it's easy to verify this. He was up by the count of nine, but the referee, perhaps sensing the crowd was already celebrating an Ali victory, and that Ali's entourage was already going up the ring, pushed Foreman to the corner and waved the fight off. Bert Sugar thinks Foreman was beaten mentally, which was why he didn't protest. He should have been allowed to continue.

Don't get me wrong, Ali-Frazier III was the first thing I ever watched on TV, and I admire Ali as a boxer. Ali's main fault as a boxer was that he never learned to slip and duck punches. He relied on his legs in the 60's. In the 70's, when he could no longer move away fast enough, he relied on his arms and chin. But what an amazing chin! Foreman said he could see Ali getting glassy-eyed, going to sleep, everytime he hit him with those monster punches, then seconds later, Ali would wake up and taunt him again. For all of the praises heaped on his genius, it was Ali's physical gifts that made him great. And his pride.

But he got away with a lot of bad stuff, those decision victories over Norton and Jimmy Young. He ducked Doug Jones, after Jones made him look bad (Ali still won). But worse are the things out of the ring that he got away with, especially his racist taunting of Joe Frazier, who by all accounts, was a genuinely good man. That "Ali boomaye" (Ali, kill him!) chant by the crowd in Zaire wasn't spontaneous, days before the fight, he asked the locals for the words for the phrase, then encouraged them to shout it.

I wonder why the black community never censured Ali for his racial abuse on opponents, quite the opposite, they worshipped him and condemned those he ridiculed as Uncle Toms. I can only guess that they didn't want to destroy their bigger-than-life hero. Can you imagine any athlete today getting away with calling his competitor "gorilla"?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but let me just say; Sugar Ray LEONARD achieved nearly all that Ali achieved, including fame and the people's love, while resorting to little self-promotion and rarely, if ever, losing his decency. Just saying. Getting off the soapbox now. :)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bioguy01 wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

I am of the opinion that the truth is whatever you believe it to be. Even in this day and age when information is so readily available, it doesn't me that the information is good or reliable. One person may say that they have seen a mountain lion, an government internet source may say mountain lions were extirpated several years ago and do not exist in the state, and a trail camera photo of a mountain lion circulating through people's email may state that the photo was taken in the nearby area. Which source of information do you believe? There's nothing wrong with a healthy dose of skepticism, but there are times when people think the actual truth is a complete lie and cannot be convinced otherwise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckstopper wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

There is nothing more truthful than satire and humor. There will never be another
Ed Zern. I grew up reading Exit Laughing. Theres got to be a book with his stories somewhere........well DP?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Boxing is hardly a gentlemanly sport, not much different from MMA and WWF in its heyday. Off to mowing the back forty.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Davidpetzal,
Cannot imagine a race like that would work, think of the harsh climate and isolation. For example when my noble husky died in his gallant effort I had a terrible logistical problem getting flowers for his bereaved ----- mother.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

As for outdoor writing, I believe Jim Carmichel when he said gunwriters tend to copy one another, usually from one generation to the next. Unfortunately, the biases, mistakes and myths get repeated, and there comes a point where nobody cares to test/prove them anymore because two or more generations of respected gunwriters have already written about the subject.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

To O Garcia: Jim also said that there is nothing deader than a dead gun writer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

To Buckstopper: There's "Hunting and Fishing from A to Zern," and you can get a copy on Amazon. I have one from Ed, and it's inscribed: "To Dave Petzal, without whom this book would have been possible."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

DEP,
Now that is classic Ed Zern!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

I am still skeptical of new product reviews by modern gun writers, esp. semi-auto pistols.
A new gun, out of the box, not yet broken in, shoots five hundred rounds of all brands of ammo without a glitch.
I'm pretty sure I don't believe that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckstopper wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

Then Dave, you must be a charter member of the Madison Avenue Rod and Gun Club.Thanks for the info.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunny Bob wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

And then there are PHs who told tales that, lacking documented evidence (including photographic), would seem to smack of the impossible. One such fellow was the legendary John Kingsley-Heath, who passed not that long ago, and whose remarkable tome "Hunting the Dangerous Game of Africa" I was so fortunate to have edited. Stories like the Hombolo rhino, the Merrill elephant and the time he was being eaten alive by a huge lion that had sneaked up to the back of John's leopard blind, are all supported with multiple witnesses and wonderful photos. Sitting in John and his terrific wife Sue's 350-year-old farmhouse in Cornwall and drinking brandy while perusing his massive photo and film collection is a memory I treasure. He is missed.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 4 hours ago

Davepetzal,
Our comments on writers reminded me of an experience of a few years ago. I had loaned to a. Friend my copy , The Book. of The Rifle, by Jim Carmichel and it was not returned. A few years later at SCI Convention I dropped by a booth, asking if they had a copy. They indicated they had one second hand copy available, but it was full of hand writing, front, back and in the margins, so gave it to me for a few bucks. Later examination showed an inscription from Mr Carmichel to his friend George Hoffman, the African hunter and writer. The interesting interior notes were both critical and complimentary, giving the appearance he was planning a long letter to Mr Carmichel. Wonder if he did so before his death.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 1 hour ago

To Happy Miles: I can ask Jim the next time I see him. A military historian of my acquaintance told me that one of the worst things that had happened to libraries was computer indexes. The old card files, he said, contained generations of notes scribbled on them by researchers that were often very valuable. "This book is generally accurate, but his account of the Battle of Blood River contains serious in accuracies."

That sort of thing. Have you ever been to Ishandlwana?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 52 min ago

David petzel,
Yes, have been there, fortunately long after the battle.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 41 min ago

Being sort of a history buff, have also visited the sites of Rorke's Drift, and Blood River.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

Happy Myles: If we ever get together, I will tell you the story of the Second Battle of Ishandlwana, of which I am one of two survivors.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

Pack your bag. June 12 leave for Cameroon's deep jungle after Forest Sitatunga. Most folks get one in 3-4 days, this will be my third attempt for this elusive critter. If, on my way, I survive downtown Douala the jungle should be a piece of cake.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

Boxing is indeed a gentlemanly sport. When I was an amateur heavyweight in college I coached boxing to young men who were interested in learning it. I taught defense, offense, and other fundamentals but also many life lessons as well like being respectful to your opponents, be a humble winner and lose gracefully with class. Perhaps most importantly whenever you get knocked down get back up and keep fighting. Life experiences are a lot like that and the most dangerous fighters are the ones who never give up. I am glad to say that most of the kids who came into the gym left better men than when they started.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from NorCal Cazadora wrote 4 weeks 1 hour ago

The_UTP beat me to it - the lies have all moved en masse to reality TV (in all areas of it, not just hunting).

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Being creative with facts is fine as long as it is well done, and Mr Lake does it well. I assure you I was not complaining. Artistic license is important in writing as well as telling tales around the campfire. I believe it was Ruark who wrote the telling about it was just about as important as the event. In fact it was OK to lie shamelessly afterwards. If it was not for good story telling by others , I would probably have spent my life ball room dancing and playing bridge instead of adventuring around the world.
I would have participated in these comments earlier, but was busy delivering serum by dog sled during a blizzard to Inuits beyond the Arctic circle when my lead dog died. But that's another story.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from The_UTP wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

It's fascinating that so-called "reality" TV isn't held to nearly the same standard. To watch those hunting shows you'd think every outing involves 20 minutes of light walking, some whispering into the camera, a boom and a dead thing and then whoops and hollers.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

To Amflyer: Nope, not Jeff Cooper. That story was told me by a fellow named Bob Zwirz, long departed.

To Huntslow: Are you sure I was referred to SD, and not BC? If so, that is simply a case of failing memory. Permit me do quote Walt Whitman: "Do I contradict myself? So be it. I encompass millions."

To Longhunter: Louis spent his army career fighting exhibitions at Army camps in the U.S., but as far as I know he never went overseas. I believe he is the greatest heavyweight of all time, and the second greatest fighter of all time just behind Sugar Ray Robinson.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lee Marvin is buried next to Joe Louis Barrow.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lee Marvin (actor), Warren Spahn (baseball LHP), Bob Feller (RHP), Ted Williams (the last guy to hit over .400), James Stewart (actor). They all fought in WW2, and by that I mean fought. Maybe not all of them were exposed to gunfire, but that was by sheer luck, they all served in combat assignments. Bob Feller was so angry after Pearl Harbor he enlisted at first opportunity. Jimmy Stewart may look gentle and like he couldn't harm a fly, but he flew bombing sorties over Nazi Germany and was decorated for his service. Ted Williams, after hesitating initially, served his country twice, the 2nd time as a fighter jet jock. There is no prouder, freer American than the Splendid Splinter, and he used that freedom well, he "chose" to serve.

There is another boxing story from WW2. When Tony Zale, who was Zaleski in real life, enlisted in the Navy, the enlisting officer noted that he was a boxer and said you're going to have some company, they say Tony Zale is going to enlist, too, and he's a great, tough fighter. Zale, who shunned the spotlight, must be grinning inside when he heard that.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

To Happy Myles: Delivering serum is a noble enterprise, and I think someone should commemorate the event by creating a sled-dog race and calling it the Iditarod. Think it will fly?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Dave: Joe Louis sighned up for the Army in 1942 and did box while he was in the service. Is it possible that the gun writer had met him during that period of time? Just a thought as I will readily admit that I do not know where he was stationed. Joe was a true American, courageous, humble and a great fighter. It would have indeed been a priviledge to spar with him.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom-Tom wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

On your next trip to Washington, DC, make the effort to take the subway to Arlington National Cemetery. After watching the Changing of the Guard, its a short down hill walk to Joe Lewis's burial plot. You can pay your respects; and by the way, the guy buried next to Joe is someone you should remember.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Jersey Joe Walcott appeared to have underachieved because most of the time he was hungry. Like literally, one meal in a week or something at the worst. Those were hard times, and even harder for black folk, even those with athletic ability, because major league football and baseball were still closed to them, and boxing was the only pro sport where they could play to white audiences. Few invested in him early in his career because he often appeared to be taking it easy. He was merely conserving energy.

Jersey Joe was hired for a week to spar with a young but bright prospect named Joe Louis while the latter prepared to face a German named Max Schmelling, and according to the story, he was fired after he dropped Louis twice. Jersey Joe would recount later that Louis was easy to hit and predicted the German would win. Schmelling knocked Louis out, capitalizing on Louis' tendency to drop his left arm after a jab. To be fair, Joe Louis did win the rematch in less than one round.

When Jersey Joe finally faced Joe Louis in a competitive fight, he so dominated the fight, knocking Louis down twice, that Joe Louis was already on his way down the ring, knowing he'd lost. The judges gave Louis the victory. Again, Louis did better in the rematch, knocking Jersey Joe out.

Jersey Joe was also leading Rocky Marciano until Rocky hit him with that right hand in the 13th, leaving him trapped on the ropes like a fly on a spider's web, according to one sportswriter.

Jersey Joe had hard luck.

George Foreman was never counted out in The Rumble In The Jungle. The fight is on DVD, so it's easy to verify this. He was up by the count of nine, but the referee, perhaps sensing the crowd was already celebrating an Ali victory, and that Ali's entourage was already going up the ring, pushed Foreman to the corner and waved the fight off. Bert Sugar thinks Foreman was beaten mentally, which was why he didn't protest. He should have been allowed to continue.

Don't get me wrong, Ali-Frazier III was the first thing I ever watched on TV, and I admire Ali as a boxer. Ali's main fault as a boxer was that he never learned to slip and duck punches. He relied on his legs in the 60's. In the 70's, when he could no longer move away fast enough, he relied on his arms and chin. But what an amazing chin! Foreman said he could see Ali getting glassy-eyed, going to sleep, everytime he hit him with those monster punches, then seconds later, Ali would wake up and taunt him again. For all of the praises heaped on his genius, it was Ali's physical gifts that made him great. And his pride.

But he got away with a lot of bad stuff, those decision victories over Norton and Jimmy Young. He ducked Doug Jones, after Jones made him look bad (Ali still won). But worse are the things out of the ring that he got away with, especially his racist taunting of Joe Frazier, who by all accounts, was a genuinely good man. That "Ali boomaye" (Ali, kill him!) chant by the crowd in Zaire wasn't spontaneous, days before the fight, he asked the locals for the words for the phrase, then encouraged them to shout it.

I wonder why the black community never censured Ali for his racial abuse on opponents, quite the opposite, they worshipped him and condemned those he ridiculed as Uncle Toms. I can only guess that they didn't want to destroy their bigger-than-life hero. Can you imagine any athlete today getting away with calling his competitor "gorilla"?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

To Buckstopper: There's "Hunting and Fishing from A to Zern," and you can get a copy on Amazon. I have one from Ed, and it's inscribed: "To Dave Petzal, without whom this book would have been possible."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

You have to admit those earlier writers got the attention of wide-eyed 13 yr. olds, like me. Russell Annabel made me want to hit the high trail to Alaska and become a trapper. The 1984 Jack O'Connor book "The Last Book- Confessions of a Gun Editor" goes into more detail about what Mr. Petzal talks about here.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntslow wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DEP - In keeping with the "catching the errors" (or at least the history), you state in the latest issue of the F&S magazine that you pay no attention to sectional density. It seems that you have before sung the praises of various 6.5 cartridges, especially when they are launching the 156 grain Oryx bullet with it's high SD. May I also remind you of Megan Fox and Rosie O'Donnell?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Douglas wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

You writers for this magazine exhibit an uncommon level of truthful journalism. That's why I waste so much time on this site. I learn something new all the time here.
As for my favorite lie.. "I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

@huntslow - how dare you mention Megan Fox and the queen of sectional density in the same sentence? that's just sick...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom-Tom wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Whatever happened to ethics in print and broadcast journalism? With biased reporting rampant, with special interest viewpoints the norm, was it any wonder people grew more skeptical. When was the last time you saw a "reporter" give you "just the facts" of a story? In my opinion, if you took the combined sense of ethics of some of our larger broadcast networks and newspapers, rolled them into a ball and shoved said ball up the fundament of a gnat, it would rattle like a BB in a boxcar. When an outdoor writer "stretched the truth" or "exagerated" somewhat, was it done to be entertaining? Or was it done to advertise and/or promote a product or service?

When we read stories by Corey Ford or Patrick McManus, we did so to be entertained. When you write an article, Dave, or broadcast a segment on The Gun Nuts, you are educational as well as entertaining. The real problem may be that not everyone was brought up or educated to respect the truth the way you were.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MReeder wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

I think Dave hit it on the head when he noted that readers back in the day expected and even desired a little more BS in their outdoor yarns. Tales tended to be a bit more lurid, in keeping with the artwork on the front of the magazines. Call it literary license or style if you wish. You didn't read Ruark for his firearm expertise -- he obviously didn't have much -- but no one ever captured the essence of a hunt or a place or a moment in time as well as RR. O'Connor combined style, knowledge and hard facts better than any other writer of that era, while some of the others stretched credulity to the point of disbelief (Keith leaps instantly to mind). That aside, there's something to be said for a ripping good adventure story as long as you don't take it too seriously. Personally, I always wondered how someone could be so sure that climactic shot across the mountain at the end of their story covered 600-yards, since they didn't have rangefinders and had no way of pacing off the distance across an open chasm...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

God help me, that should be "I referred," and "to quote."

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from haverodwilltravel wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

There are Sportsmen who write and then there are Writers who sometimes hunt and fish. In the early days, most outdoor writers could "put up". Many of them worked for this very magazine and still do.
The worst time in outdoor writing took place about 7 to 10 years ago (mostly in the Fly Fishing magazines) when newbies to the sport, fresh out of college wrote "destination" articles for freebie trips...Let's be honest,if someone is picking up the tab, how honest a review can the beneficiary of the trip be in his critique? Hell, they were as obvious in their "River Runs through it" outfits as a City Slicker riding a horse.
I've guided outdoor writers& TV folks on fly fishing trips and bird hunting (not for $$$..only because I was asked)....some were gifted sportsmen, some were gifted writers and some were just fibbers. Some even felt it necessary to embellish to make themselves look like they were Lefty Kreh or Tom Knapp (RIP)...and trust me, they weren't.
IMHO, if you aren't afield or working on your craft over a 100 days a year (or have done so for many years)....you probably shouldn't be writing as an expert.
That said if you really want to know who the good ones are, ask a guide (most times the real expert on the story). Most won't give out any info...unless they've had a few pops. ;)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carl Huber wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Unless the writer is talking about a product endorsement or historic event a little poetic license is allowed. As long as the story is within reason and entertaining who cares if the shot is 500 or 700 yards. If anything it will start a debate and sell the writer's next publication. I think most Raconteurs follow the last line of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence "when it comes to printing the truth or the legend, print the legend".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If all fishermen are liars, then how could those who extoll them be any different?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Davidpetzal,
Cannot imagine a race like that would work, think of the harsh climate and isolation. For example when my noble husky died in his gallant effort I had a terrible logistical problem getting flowers for his bereaved ----- mother.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

To O Garcia: Jim also said that there is nothing deader than a dead gun writer.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 4 hours ago

Davepetzal,
Our comments on writers reminded me of an experience of a few years ago. I had loaned to a. Friend my copy , The Book. of The Rifle, by Jim Carmichel and it was not returned. A few years later at SCI Convention I dropped by a booth, asking if they had a copy. They indicated they had one second hand copy available, but it was full of hand writing, front, back and in the margins, so gave it to me for a few bucks. Later examination showed an inscription from Mr Carmichel to his friend George Hoffman, the African hunter and writer. The interesting interior notes were both critical and complimentary, giving the appearance he was planning a long letter to Mr Carmichel. Wonder if he did so before his death.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Amflyer wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DEP, are you talking Jeff Cooper here?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve in Virginia wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Actually, this post would have been much more interesting had it included a picture of Megan Fox...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Megan Fox and Rosie O"Donnell in the same sentence is OK, because it is making the comparison between heaven and hell.
As to the internet,and truth, so much is taken as gospel without being checked out. I think for some, it is sear volume, too much information at one moment of time. For others, it is that they do not want to know the truth, so they will just believe the cr@p they are fed without question.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

these are facts. when i read an article written by David Petzal, i believe it to be true. on the other hand, i have not believed anything that has come from the government since Ronald Regan left office. it is a sad country that can believe the people who write about sports, but can not believe ANYTHING that their government tells them.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Safado wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dave,
Keep telling the truth and we will keep reading. Other than film I never saw Joe Louis or Sugar Ray Robinson fight but I share your high regard for their fighting ability.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If that don't beat all. Wondered what happened to ol' Bob. He wrote for Gun World? or was it Guns. I met him at the 1979? NRA convention in KCMO. Same day I met Elmer.
Dave, is it Gen. Billy Mitchell? Been there just not sure if I can remember. Arlington is an awesome place full of my heroes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

If that don't beat all. Wondered what happened to ol' Bob. He wrote for Gun World? or was it Guns. I met him at the 1979? NRA convention in KCMO. Same day I met Elmer.
Dave, is it Gen. Billy Mitchell? Been there just not sure if I can remember. Arlington is an awesome place full of my heroes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tim Platt wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Why was I thinking of Elmer Kieth? I think O'Connor was mainly honest but I do remember him saying something about hitting running deer from around 200 yards.

The greatest was Muhammad Ali. End of discussion.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I was told by a prominent retired journalist over the weekend that writers who wrote the truth were soon unemployed.

Lee Marvin was one hell of an actor. They don't make'm like that anymore.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RandyMI wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I'm so glad you're being truthful but I never suspected any BS..... I'm especially glad that my 'breeding' just finally improved!!! :-)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MReeder wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dr. Ralph,
O'Connor did indeed write about hitting running deer -- and running sheep -- at ranges out to 200 yards and beyond, but he never claimed to hit them every time or make perfect hits. He was one of the few writers I know who would actually say in print that he flat missed four or five times, or hit a little far back but slowed his target down enough to get in a killing shot. Recall he grew up in open desert and canyon country in Arizona and did a lot of hunting in Sonora, Mexico. I used to do a lot of deer hunting in similar country in west Texas and employed some of his same techniques; ie, rolling stones into likely brushy spots from above and seeing what came boiling out of the draw. As long as the backdrop was safe and you'd done enough jackrabbit shooting hitting running deer under those conditions wasn't that big a feat. O'Connor always credited thousands of rounds shot at jackrabbits for any skill he had at hitting running game. Just as woodchucks teach long distance skills, jackrabbits teach you how to hit game on the run. Back in my much younger and dumber days we used to shoot running jacks out of the back of moving pickups; kind of like "Hatari" with shotguns. It was actually one of the more popular, multi-generational pastimes where I grew up in the middle-of-nowhere Texas. Believe it or not you can actually get pretty good at that, too, assuming you live through it...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Dr. Ralph,

Muhammad Ali(then still Cassius Clay)'s wide-eyed, loud claim "I must be the greatest!", part of his now famous "I shocked the world" post fight "speech" after stopping Sonny Liston, was essentially mirrored by Mike Tyson after the latter defeated Trevor Berbick. I would chalk it up to exuberance of youth, in both cases. Ali would not become the greatest until the 1970's, when he finally faced fighters his own size who also edged him in power (Ken Norton and Foreman) and still overcame them when nearly all of his 1960's foot speed was gone. When he could no longer backpedal away from punches, he absorbed them.

I agree that Ali was the greatest heavyweight, but maintain that Sugar Ray Robinson was the greatest fighter of all time, regardless of weight division.

As for the "best" heavyweight, Larry Holmes had a stiffer jab than Ali, and not only could Larry block Ali's jab, but he could counter it with a quick right hand that Ali often didn't see coming. And that was when they were still sparring partners, in Ali's early 1970's condition, that is, post-incarceration but before the effects of Parkinson's, so still in good shape. Ali had more charisma and grace, and Holmes often looked like a craftsman next to Ali's artist, but Holmes technically, in my opinion was better.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from kudukid wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

We never got to see a match between Cassius and Teófilo Stevenson. Remember him saying before an Olympics bout that he would knock out his opponent and no one would see the punch.
I watched intently. He knocked the guy out and I never saw the punch.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

To O Garcia: Watch films of the young Joe Louis and you will see a virtually perfect prizefighter, without Ali's flaws. At any rate, here's a Tony Zale story.

In 1955, when the movie Somebody Up There Likes Me (the story of Rocky Graziano) was being filmed, Paul Newman played Graziano, and in the scene where he fights Tony Zale for the middleweight championship, Zale played himself. As they got in the ring, Newman took one look at the expression on Zale's face and said, "F*** this, that guy wants to kill me," and got out of the ring. Finally, the director managed to convince Zale that he didn't have to beat Paul Newman to death, and the show went on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Lots of interesting commentary here. Of all the outdoor writers I have been reading since the '30's, when I think of who may have been the prince of invention, Peter Capstick is the first one that comes to mind. I long ago lost count of much that was obviously fiction in his writing, although at the same time I enjoyed his use of the language and found him quite entertaining. O'Connor still gets my vote as the best, and I never had reason to doubt all that he said. 200 yard running shots? I have seen that done by a couple of friends and I have done it a few times myself.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Fight Game: Louis the best. Really showed courage and skill after loosing to The German. Ali IMO was the best tactician and strategist as was shown in his Forman match. Leonard probably best all around boxer in his prime. Still can’t believe he beat Hagler.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jim in nc wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

DP: for an imaginative book on African hunting, I recommend Peter Funkhouser, THE ADVENTURES OF SIR HILLARY RINDERPEST, from Little River Press, in Concord, Mass. He swears every word is true.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

I think that Joe Louis was the greatest heavyweight of all time and could have taken Ali prime vs prime. Sugar Ray Robinson thought so and even said that the often over-looked Jersey Joe Walcott would have given him issues. Larry Holmes was another great but never received his due after Alis reign. Sugar Ray Robinson was the best pound for pound and I though that after him Roberto Duran was amazingly talented. Boxing, I am sorry to say seems to have lost much of the charm that it used to have.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from HogBlog wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

Hemingway once wrote that, before he turned in for the day, he strove to write, "one true thing."

He went on to explain that "true" didn't mean nailing ever fact to a wall, but that it had to ring true... to capture the inherent truth in the subject so that when the reader reads it, he understands.

When I read Capstick, Ruark, or most of the old-time great outdoor adventure writers, I'm not sure they're always telling the facts... but what made them good was that I always felt like they were telling the truth.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

MReeder- You used SHOTGUNS?? How very unsporting of you. Ducking, jumping, twisting cottontails out of the back of a pickup with .22s is the way to practice. At night, of course. Gotta keep those little rascals in the headlights to get a shot. Anything but head shots is frowned upon, and considered city slicker stuff.
For long range practice, jacks and armadillos out on the mesquite flats just at sundown are the way to go. With a .222. 'Dillers are never still. A few second pause is a long time. Jacks are about the same, but tend to sit for a few seconds after moving. Behind a prickly pear, or mesquite bush, of course.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but let me just say; Sugar Ray LEONARD achieved nearly all that Ali achieved, including fame and the people's love, while resorting to little self-promotion and rarely, if ever, losing his decency. Just saying. Getting off the soapbox now. :)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bioguy01 wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

I am of the opinion that the truth is whatever you believe it to be. Even in this day and age when information is so readily available, it doesn't me that the information is good or reliable. One person may say that they have seen a mountain lion, an government internet source may say mountain lions were extirpated several years ago and do not exist in the state, and a trail camera photo of a mountain lion circulating through people's email may state that the photo was taken in the nearby area. Which source of information do you believe? There's nothing wrong with a healthy dose of skepticism, but there are times when people think the actual truth is a complete lie and cannot be convinced otherwise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckstopper wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

There is nothing more truthful than satire and humor. There will never be another
Ed Zern. I grew up reading Exit Laughing. Theres got to be a book with his stories somewhere........well DP?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Boxing is hardly a gentlemanly sport, not much different from MMA and WWF in its heyday. Off to mowing the back forty.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

As for outdoor writing, I believe Jim Carmichel when he said gunwriters tend to copy one another, usually from one generation to the next. Unfortunately, the biases, mistakes and myths get repeated, and there comes a point where nobody cares to test/prove them anymore because two or more generations of respected gunwriters have already written about the subject.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

DEP,
Now that is classic Ed Zern!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 99explorer wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

I am still skeptical of new product reviews by modern gun writers, esp. semi-auto pistols.
A new gun, out of the box, not yet broken in, shoots five hundred rounds of all brands of ammo without a glitch.
I'm pretty sure I don't believe that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckstopper wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

Then Dave, you must be a charter member of the Madison Avenue Rod and Gun Club.Thanks for the info.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunny Bob wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

And then there are PHs who told tales that, lacking documented evidence (including photographic), would seem to smack of the impossible. One such fellow was the legendary John Kingsley-Heath, who passed not that long ago, and whose remarkable tome "Hunting the Dangerous Game of Africa" I was so fortunate to have edited. Stories like the Hombolo rhino, the Merrill elephant and the time he was being eaten alive by a huge lion that had sneaked up to the back of John's leopard blind, are all supported with multiple witnesses and wonderful photos. Sitting in John and his terrific wife Sue's 350-year-old farmhouse in Cornwall and drinking brandy while perusing his massive photo and film collection is a memory I treasure. He is missed.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 5 weeks 1 hour ago

To Happy Miles: I can ask Jim the next time I see him. A military historian of my acquaintance told me that one of the worst things that had happened to libraries was computer indexes. The old card files, he said, contained generations of notes scribbled on them by researchers that were often very valuable. "This book is generally accurate, but his account of the Battle of Blood River contains serious in accuracies."

That sort of thing. Have you ever been to Ishandlwana?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 52 min ago

David petzel,
Yes, have been there, fortunately long after the battle.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 5 weeks 41 min ago

Being sort of a history buff, have also visited the sites of Rorke's Drift, and Blood River.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

Happy Myles: If we ever get together, I will tell you the story of the Second Battle of Ishandlwana, of which I am one of two survivors.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

Pack your bag. June 12 leave for Cameroon's deep jungle after Forest Sitatunga. Most folks get one in 3-4 days, this will be my third attempt for this elusive critter. If, on my way, I survive downtown Douala the jungle should be a piece of cake.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Longhunter wrote 4 weeks 4 days ago

Boxing is indeed a gentlemanly sport. When I was an amateur heavyweight in college I coached boxing to young men who were interested in learning it. I taught defense, offense, and other fundamentals but also many life lessons as well like being respectful to your opponents, be a humble winner and lose gracefully with class. Perhaps most importantly whenever you get knocked down get back up and keep fighting. Life experiences are a lot like that and the most dangerous fighters are the ones who never give up. I am glad to say that most of the kids who came into the gym left better men than when they started.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from NorCal Cazadora wrote 4 weeks 1 hour ago

The_UTP beat me to it - the lies have all moved en masse to reality TV (in all areas of it, not just hunting).

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ncarl wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Dcast beat me to it. +1

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from SL wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

DP said: " When was the last time someone from the government, or from a corporation, or the military, or from the news media, said something and you flat-out believed it?"

Maybe not the government, corporations, military or news, but have the NRA say something and most posters here will cling to it like flies on you know what! LOL

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ontario Honker ... wrote 5 weeks 3 days ago

The old guys knew how to write stories. The new breed mostly writes endorsements. Personally I think it would be terrible to have to write for approval. That would take all the fun out of it. One of the wonderful things about these blogs is contributors can express themselves freely and tell stories like they want them to be heard, not for what is needed to sell. It's too bad the blog editors don't have the same freedom. I think it would be an eye-opener if they did!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dcast wrote 5 weeks 4 days ago

Douglas, Have you read an article by Bob Marshall? Full of mistruths, half truths, with plenty of BS to fill in the space between what he wants everyone to believe! Then again there are plenty of people here that DP described in his article that just take his words as facts.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment