


March 19, 2010
Petzal: The Bushnell 6X-24X Elite 4200 Tactical
By David E. Petzal
When talking about the 4200 Elite, I find it necessary to repeat the following: When the scope came out in the early 1990s, I was drawn to it for a variety of reasons, and ended up with maybe half a dozen. When the company developed Rain Guard coating for the line, I sold all the first crop and replaced them with the newer scopes. All told, I’ve had something like 14 Elite 4200s in service for close to 20 years, used them everywhere, mounted them on some fearsome rifles, and never had one fail in any way, shape, or form.
Which brings us to the latest Elite 4200. It is a tactical scope, which means that it is designed to shoot people (If it’s OK for you to do so; otherwise don’t) or for use on a beanfield gun, or on a predator rifle. It has a 30mm tube, cranks from 6X to 24X, has a 50mm objective, dial-mounted parallax adjustment, and an illuminated mil-dot reticle in the first focal plane so you can range at any power. It’s neither long nor bulky, but at 22 ounces, it’s not light, which is actually an advantage on a tactical scope.
The illuminated reticle is powered by a battery mounted on the ocular-lens bell, and you can adjust it for brightness. When you turn on the juice, it glows an attractive lime color, or maybe it’s chartreuse. In any event, you will not need illumination until it is very, very dark, this scope being as bright and sharp as it is.
About price: The list for this Elite is just over $1,000, but in the real world, you can get it for around $750--or under $650 if you don’t want the illuminated reticle. This puts it in reach of even shooters who are not rich. Writing about affordable equipment makes me feel very badly, and I guarantee you that this will not be the case with the next tactical scope that I review here.
Comments (46)
Something to consider for the .338
Glad to hear you will continue to work both side of the street Dave. You need a bout of the wuzwells occasionally to keep you grounded and in touch with the less well heeled.
For a standard hunting rifle where do you put your money, the 4200 line or the 6500 line?
Cheers!
Bee
The 4200 line is awesome, plain and simple.
To beekeeper: For a standard hunting rifle where you don't need lots of power, the 4200 in 2.5X-10X. I've never been in a situation where it was not up to the job.
Looks like a great scope for "Way Out There". Especially for under $1000.
Those silly smallbore and highpower silhouette guys shoot alot looking through a 4200 elite 6x-24x.
Dave, Amazon has the 4200 Elite 3-9X40 matte on sale now with free shipping for $220 and change. Would you pull the trigger?
To Beekeper: I'd rather have the 2.5X-10X, but that is a hell of a good price, and if you like the power range, buy away.
Thanks Dave! I think I'll pull the trigger on the 3x9. That power band will work for the application. Besides it is a heck of a deal! They have the 2.5-10X40 with firefly reticle in the very low 4's and the 2.5-10X50 in the mid 4's if your interested. Makes one glad Al Gore invented the internet....
Dave or Bee,
Do the 2.5 x 10, or 3 x 9 adjustment knobs protrude as far as appear in the photo 0f the 6 x 24? I am sensitive that for a 1000 yard bean field, or most varmint situations including shooting bad guys this not an issue. However some of the tough country with deadfalls I hunt, and some of the rough stock that carry my rifle under my leg these things knobs take a lot of abuse.
I apologize for not knowing this answer, but rarely go to stores anymore or even look at catalogs. Most of my tons of gear were purchased long ago.
With three extra scopes sitting in the cabinet, and everything I have mounted acting right, I just can't justify another scope. Maybe if I broke my least favorite scope, I could replace it with an Elite?
To Happy Myles: Neither the 2.5X-10X nor the 3X-9X have the big knobs. You don't want to lug a tactical scope around the boondocks.
I look forward to the next article with great anticipation. I pray the next scope comes with an exorbitant price tag to cater to the majority of us F&S readers. I hate when people assume we are all 'working' men and women. Hopefully the next scope reviewed will have an MSRP of greater than 1500 euros. OK, enough sarcasm, this scope looks great. Whole bunch of features and quality that doesn't make me cry when I see the price tag... Hell even if it did, might as well get it now while your dollar is still worth something. I'll take 2 please!
I have the Bushnell Banner in non-illuminated, non-tactical, non-elite. It's 4x24x40, has mil dot, and cost $130.
Not nearly as fancy, but works great on my Remington, and is my third Bushnell. I'm looking at another small one for my Air rifle* since I put that one on my wife's .22.
* For those who would warn me about using rifle scopes on high-powered air rifles, and the "reverse recoil" that can screw some up, the Bushnell Banner (and up) series are dual-insulated, and work fine on air rifles too. I've been playing musical scopes so long, I decided to buy a couple more.
Forgot to add...
I'm not "talking down" that scope at all. It's great, but I can't afford that level at this time.
But as a loyal Bushnell lover, I will spend that much on smaller scopes over my life, so the company needs to keep remembering people like me.
Happy I will defer to Mr. Petzel's expertise with the 4200 Elites. This will be my first Elite rifle scope. I've been a very happy Leupold and Burris owner. I will say I found nothing objectionable in relation to carry comfort on the non-target models I have fondled in the market place.
Sounds like a great scope for the money! Has anyone else noticed the quality of "affordable" scopes drastically increasing as of late? I think it's great. Nothing wrong w/pricey glass, but if you can't afford it, it's nice to know the 'cheaper' alternatives are making such great strides in quality and clarity. I bought a Bushnell Legend for peanuts 4 years ago, and mounted it on my 'backup' deer rifle. It's performed marvelously, and has helped harvest my nephew's first deer, and a buddy's deer. I honestly can't tell the difference in clarity or light gathering between it and my Leupold VX-III that I paid almost triple the price for.
I'd love to have one. But 650 to 1000 for a scope is way too much for me. My T/C Venture only cost me 450. I'll have to settle for a lesser scope for now. I've done fine with them so far.
I recently looked at an Elite 4200 3-9x40 at my local emporium of fine firearms and was very impressed. "Looks" to be equal to all but the really high end scopes.
On Bushnell's, I have had a bunch of them on trade rifles and all but one performed satisfactorily while shooting to determine if the rifle was a keeper or not. Some of the old Banner, Trophy, and Scope Chief models aren't bad at all. I have been in the bad habit mode of upgrading to the best glass I needed or could afford (not always the same).
The word "Tactical" in the name jacks up the price a couple of hundred dollars. Tactical isn't a piece of equipment, it's a state of mind.
I am so set my ways and choices that I am slow to change from one brand or thing to another. Basically if it works for me without flaw I just don't change. With this mentality I probably miss out on lots of innovations that I would prefer given the option to actually use them. Perhaps I should get over my "el cheapo scope aka Bushnell" attitude and buy one of these instruments. I might be pleasantly surprised. I don't want or need the battery powered recticle as it falls into the gadget category given the type of hunting in which I usually participate.
Looks like a neat scope but I buy gear for what I use it for most. I dont shoot long range much but like to be able to if required. You can never go wrong on buying quality, and the gun/scope I thought was big money seems a deal 20 years later and still perfect and even better deal when you can pass it on and its still top quality. The gear you cheap out on can cost you big time if it fails when you need it most. Find out your x hairs are moving on a wilderness hunt and no iron sights on your gun makes that few dollars you saved initially seem stupid. And how many shots did you blow before you realized the scope was garbage? Tough lessons so learn them from the aged ones, its cheaper that way. Had scope with lit reticle but if its so dark you cant see x hairs in good scope you dont want to be shooting and turning the light on seemed worse as the background appeared darker. Just my experience.
Checking catalogs almost nobody offers a fixed power scope in the 8-12 range any more. Any reason Dave?
Yea, that's a hellava scope with a grand track record in the field, BUT the price made me take an antacid tab.
Beekeeper,
Thanks for the heads-up on Amazon. I like my 4200 3x-9x so much that I may have to get another for my next gun, whatever it might be.
Bushnell is my brand! Can't afford the 4200 though...
I have to say, I like the 6500 in 2.5-16, and a friend of mine has a 4200 in 6-24x50 in a mil dot on a ruger .25-06 single shot, and having fired through that particular scope (and my 6500) you can achieve MOP EASILY, evens standing, and I have got standing shots at 230 and 350 yards that have hit targets the size of a small deer's killzone... hoping the 6.5x55 I bought today is as good at shooting as it looks :P
I bought the elite 6500 in 4.5-30X by 50 mm and it is very impressive. Still waiting for ER Shaw to finish my 22-250 to mount this scope on. Happy I just opened the box and checked-it's a large scope but the knobs are no bigger than any other scope this size. Got mine for $512 including tax. Hey Dave is that a good price?
These are sounding more and more like advertisements and less like a blog or opinion piece.
Sometime in the mid-1990s Bausch & Lomb had an offer where you could turn in old Balvar scopes and get the new (at that time) Elite Series at a very good price. I sent them an old Balfor 4X and a 2-1/2X-8X Balvar, got a brand new 4200 and 3200 for a total of less than $300. I put the 3200 (2X-7X) on my .243, the 4200 on my 7mm Weatherby. Both scopes have served me well.
Keep the optics talk coming. Is this thing on that Savage LRH?
JMO, but I agree with Jbird that scope quality in the lower price tier has improved recently, particularly from those made in Japan. I believe improved manufacturing techniques and quality control has led to better products that cost less to manufacture and can be priced more competitively. I think the cheap scopes imported from China and elsewhere have forced the old guard like Bushnell, Leupold, Burris, Weaver, etc to market some quality scopes at an affordable price point. Not everyone needs or can afford super duper triple multicoated lenses with the same stuff they used on the Hubble Space Telescope. I'll probably continue to buy the best that I can afford, but there are some nice new scopes out there in the $150- $250 range these days. The new Redfield by Leupold and Sightron S-II series comes to mind. The Bushnell 3200 is a nice scope, too.
I can hardly wait to get my Burris Signature Select out to the field for a shoot!
WA Mtnhunter-
One of the best and brightest scopes I have is a very old Simmons that was made in Japan, before Simmons went to China. No super-duper-whooper, no bells or whistles. It will hold it's own with my Leupolds and Burris. Got another Simmons in trade a few guns back, and replaced it before I even shot it. I'm waiting for an excuse to get either a new Redfield or a Bushnell Elite.
My dad has one of the first 4200's that came with the rain guard on top of a vintage S&W 308. The combination has proven very effective and reliable to say the least.
crm3006
You are correct, sir. Some of the early Simmons and Tasco scopes were pretty fair pieces of glass. Some of them are actually very good. The fact that they outsourced the manufacturing from one outfit to the other led to quality issues and crummy reputations. I think that a blanket statement that all (fill in the blank) scopes are crap is not entirely accurate for a lot of the long time brands. Look at Weaver for example. Some of them were the best available many years ago and then fell into the offshore abyss. Same with Redfield. You just have to know what you are looking at (or through) and be able to tell quality from crap.
I have a fixed 4 power Banner on my 45-70 GG. I've worked some pretty heavy loads for for it in case I get Charged by a Cape Buff or and Elephant here in Bowling Green, Ohio. Anyways, with the rounds I put through it, it hasn't moved an bit. Got a nikon prostaff for my lh 25-06 which is great, but my next nice scope will be a Bushnell
Please tell me it's not made in China!
All the bells and whitsels are just that, the more junk you got on a scoe the more problems you got.S for Simmons, Tasco, they should be trashed, o at least mine. I got both and just waitig till I get a trad-in that needs a scope to sell, and the lot of them goes. My # 1 choice is Nikon 3 x 9 x 40 or the new nikon 2.5 x 12 x 42. I have thoe o all my rocky mtns hunts on Rem.700's nd one Mauser custon job. My home guns, cheaper than the 700's all cary Bushnell Dusk to Dawn, even on my Black/Powder's guns.So far, no problem, I do like the 6" eye relief,as can mount forwar adn see the entirclecircle, regardless of the distance you hold. Plus Yoou can get l0-15min of more shooting early and late. I tried the lK to l500.00 scopes and not equal to the Nikons. The Nikons now made in Spain, not Japan, not cheap,but mid-range at about 500.00. So will stick with what I got and leave the trouble makers on the shelves.Always varya extra scope and rings what-eve scope you use. As the baggage handlers try their best to break the gun case in l/2 . Bought a l75.00 cae with dbe lining and you would have thought it ws dropped from 40.000 ft/ but the Nikon Scopes held ther zero. Oe lst thing,I use Leupold Dual Dove tail on all my scoped guns. Once zeroed, it stayes zeroed.
Yesterday the UPS guy delivered a Bushnell Banner 4X scope from my friend Happy Myles. He donated the scope for Wesley. Last night I coated the lens with some stuff that prevents fogging and coated the outside with ultraguncoat. Next I mounted the scope on a new CVA Wolf 50 cal in-line that Bill Evans donated for Wesley. This morning at the range that combination knocked my socks off. With 2-50 grain white hot pellets and a 295 grain powerbelt bullet this gun will shoot the lights out. I put 6 bullets into a group that was all touching in one oblong hole at 100 yds. Velocity averaged 1550 fps which was about 100 fps faster than pyrodex pellets and more accurate. Naturally I took a pic of the target. I have considered Bushnell scopes to be junk all these years but not anymore.
Dell in KS what is the name of that stuff you put on the lenses and where did you purchase? I been wanting to try something along that order myself. If it works on windshields,should work on guns. I got a Wolf and a Huntrbolt and Bushnell Dusk to Dawn scopes,(I use Nikons on my western guns and the rifles i use here. I use different guns for each place. last 2 yrs the B/P's killed 7 deer with l shot. I use the 2 45 gr Pyrodex Pointed and 100 grs of Pyrodex. I;m looking at a Traditions Yukon and a Pursuit (changeable bbls), like both, but kinda leaning to the latter due to 4" longer bbl and it' tappered.Never cared for B/P till about 4 yrs ago, but nt got the fever. I'd like to try MT for the B/P season during the rut.
Gunslinger, The stuff I used was very simular to the raincoat 2 finish on new Bushnell scopes. I got it from Bill Evans at ultracoatingsinc. Don't recall what he called it but it is good stuff. I put a coat on my truck windshield and rain beads and runs off. Lasts much longer than rainX too. You can reach Bill at www.ultracoatingsinc.com. Tell him I sent you and he will know what it is you need.
awsome scope
My brother had gave me one of these. I think he had paid $675 on Amazon for it. Anyways...I've yet to test it out.
kinect x360
Looks like a neat scope but I buy gear for what I use it for most. منتديات I dont shoot long range much but like to be able to if required. مسجات You can never go wrong on buying quality, وسائط and the gun/scope I thought was big money seems a deal 20 years later and still perfect and even better deal when you can pass it on and its still top quality. توبيكات The gear you cheap out on can cost you big time if it fails when you need it most. Find out your x hairs are moving on a wilderness hunt and no iron sights on your gun makes that few dollars you saved initially seem stupid. And how many shots did you blow before you realized the scope was garbage? Tough lessons so learn them from the aged ones, its cheaper that way. ماسنجر Had scope with lit reticle but if its so dark you cant see x hairs in good scope you dont want to be shooting and turning the light on seemed worse as the background appeared darker. Just my experience.
I have had em for many years now and have never had any trouble of any sort. You'll be very satisfied if you get one of these.
Work from home
For some reason you have to keep them lubricated or else the trigger gets stuck...maybe its only mine doing that.
Ulysse Nardin
Post a Comment
Glad to hear you will continue to work both side of the street Dave. You need a bout of the wuzwells occasionally to keep you grounded and in touch with the less well heeled.
For a standard hunting rifle where do you put your money, the 4200 line or the 6500 line?
Cheers!
Bee
To Beekeper: I'd rather have the 2.5X-10X, but that is a hell of a good price, and if you like the power range, buy away.
Looks like a neat scope but I buy gear for what I use it for most. I dont shoot long range much but like to be able to if required. You can never go wrong on buying quality, and the gun/scope I thought was big money seems a deal 20 years later and still perfect and even better deal when you can pass it on and its still top quality. The gear you cheap out on can cost you big time if it fails when you need it most. Find out your x hairs are moving on a wilderness hunt and no iron sights on your gun makes that few dollars you saved initially seem stupid. And how many shots did you blow before you realized the scope was garbage? Tough lessons so learn them from the aged ones, its cheaper that way. Had scope with lit reticle but if its so dark you cant see x hairs in good scope you dont want to be shooting and turning the light on seemed worse as the background appeared darker. Just my experience.
Bushnell is my brand! Can't afford the 4200 though...
The 4200 line is awesome, plain and simple.
Those silly smallbore and highpower silhouette guys shoot alot looking through a 4200 elite 6x-24x.
Thanks Dave! I think I'll pull the trigger on the 3x9. That power band will work for the application. Besides it is a heck of a deal! They have the 2.5-10X40 with firefly reticle in the very low 4's and the 2.5-10X50 in the mid 4's if your interested. Makes one glad Al Gore invented the internet....
I look forward to the next article with great anticipation. I pray the next scope comes with an exorbitant price tag to cater to the majority of us F&S readers. I hate when people assume we are all 'working' men and women. Hopefully the next scope reviewed will have an MSRP of greater than 1500 euros. OK, enough sarcasm, this scope looks great. Whole bunch of features and quality that doesn't make me cry when I see the price tag... Hell even if it did, might as well get it now while your dollar is still worth something. I'll take 2 please!
Happy I will defer to Mr. Petzel's expertise with the 4200 Elites. This will be my first Elite rifle scope. I've been a very happy Leupold and Burris owner. I will say I found nothing objectionable in relation to carry comfort on the non-target models I have fondled in the market place.
I recently looked at an Elite 4200 3-9x40 at my local emporium of fine firearms and was very impressed. "Looks" to be equal to all but the really high end scopes.
On Bushnell's, I have had a bunch of them on trade rifles and all but one performed satisfactorily while shooting to determine if the rifle was a keeper or not. Some of the old Banner, Trophy, and Scope Chief models aren't bad at all. I have been in the bad habit mode of upgrading to the best glass I needed or could afford (not always the same).
The word "Tactical" in the name jacks up the price a couple of hundred dollars. Tactical isn't a piece of equipment, it's a state of mind.
I am so set my ways and choices that I am slow to change from one brand or thing to another. Basically if it works for me without flaw I just don't change. With this mentality I probably miss out on lots of innovations that I would prefer given the option to actually use them. Perhaps I should get over my "el cheapo scope aka Bushnell" attitude and buy one of these instruments. I might be pleasantly surprised. I don't want or need the battery powered recticle as it falls into the gadget category given the type of hunting in which I usually participate.
Yea, that's a hellava scope with a grand track record in the field, BUT the price made me take an antacid tab.
Sometime in the mid-1990s Bausch & Lomb had an offer where you could turn in old Balvar scopes and get the new (at that time) Elite Series at a very good price. I sent them an old Balfor 4X and a 2-1/2X-8X Balvar, got a brand new 4200 and 3200 for a total of less than $300. I put the 3200 (2X-7X) on my .243, the 4200 on my 7mm Weatherby. Both scopes have served me well.
JMO, but I agree with Jbird that scope quality in the lower price tier has improved recently, particularly from those made in Japan. I believe improved manufacturing techniques and quality control has led to better products that cost less to manufacture and can be priced more competitively. I think the cheap scopes imported from China and elsewhere have forced the old guard like Bushnell, Leupold, Burris, Weaver, etc to market some quality scopes at an affordable price point. Not everyone needs or can afford super duper triple multicoated lenses with the same stuff they used on the Hubble Space Telescope. I'll probably continue to buy the best that I can afford, but there are some nice new scopes out there in the $150- $250 range these days. The new Redfield by Leupold and Sightron S-II series comes to mind. The Bushnell 3200 is a nice scope, too.
I can hardly wait to get my Burris Signature Select out to the field for a shoot!
Something to consider for the .338
To beekeeper: For a standard hunting rifle where you don't need lots of power, the 4200 in 2.5X-10X. I've never been in a situation where it was not up to the job.
Looks like a great scope for "Way Out There". Especially for under $1000.
Dave, Amazon has the 4200 Elite 3-9X40 matte on sale now with free shipping for $220 and change. Would you pull the trigger?
Dave or Bee,
Do the 2.5 x 10, or 3 x 9 adjustment knobs protrude as far as appear in the photo 0f the 6 x 24? I am sensitive that for a 1000 yard bean field, or most varmint situations including shooting bad guys this not an issue. However some of the tough country with deadfalls I hunt, and some of the rough stock that carry my rifle under my leg these things knobs take a lot of abuse.
I apologize for not knowing this answer, but rarely go to stores anymore or even look at catalogs. Most of my tons of gear were purchased long ago.
With three extra scopes sitting in the cabinet, and everything I have mounted acting right, I just can't justify another scope. Maybe if I broke my least favorite scope, I could replace it with an Elite?
To Happy Myles: Neither the 2.5X-10X nor the 3X-9X have the big knobs. You don't want to lug a tactical scope around the boondocks.
I have the Bushnell Banner in non-illuminated, non-tactical, non-elite. It's 4x24x40, has mil dot, and cost $130.
Not nearly as fancy, but works great on my Remington, and is my third Bushnell. I'm looking at another small one for my Air rifle* since I put that one on my wife's .22.
* For those who would warn me about using rifle scopes on high-powered air rifles, and the "reverse recoil" that can screw some up, the Bushnell Banner (and up) series are dual-insulated, and work fine on air rifles too. I've been playing musical scopes so long, I decided to buy a couple more.
Forgot to add...
I'm not "talking down" that scope at all. It's great, but I can't afford that level at this time.
But as a loyal Bushnell lover, I will spend that much on smaller scopes over my life, so the company needs to keep remembering people like me.
Sounds like a great scope for the money! Has anyone else noticed the quality of "affordable" scopes drastically increasing as of late? I think it's great. Nothing wrong w/pricey glass, but if you can't afford it, it's nice to know the 'cheaper' alternatives are making such great strides in quality and clarity. I bought a Bushnell Legend for peanuts 4 years ago, and mounted it on my 'backup' deer rifle. It's performed marvelously, and has helped harvest my nephew's first deer, and a buddy's deer. I honestly can't tell the difference in clarity or light gathering between it and my Leupold VX-III that I paid almost triple the price for.
I'd love to have one. But 650 to 1000 for a scope is way too much for me. My T/C Venture only cost me 450. I'll have to settle for a lesser scope for now. I've done fine with them so far.
Checking catalogs almost nobody offers a fixed power scope in the 8-12 range any more. Any reason Dave?
Beekeeper,
Thanks for the heads-up on Amazon. I like my 4200 3x-9x so much that I may have to get another for my next gun, whatever it might be.
I have to say, I like the 6500 in 2.5-16, and a friend of mine has a 4200 in 6-24x50 in a mil dot on a ruger .25-06 single shot, and having fired through that particular scope (and my 6500) you can achieve MOP EASILY, evens standing, and I have got standing shots at 230 and 350 yards that have hit targets the size of a small deer's killzone... hoping the 6.5x55 I bought today is as good at shooting as it looks :P
I bought the elite 6500 in 4.5-30X by 50 mm and it is very impressive. Still waiting for ER Shaw to finish my 22-250 to mount this scope on. Happy I just opened the box and checked-it's a large scope but the knobs are no bigger than any other scope this size. Got mine for $512 including tax. Hey Dave is that a good price?
Keep the optics talk coming. Is this thing on that Savage LRH?
WA Mtnhunter-
One of the best and brightest scopes I have is a very old Simmons that was made in Japan, before Simmons went to China. No super-duper-whooper, no bells or whistles. It will hold it's own with my Leupolds and Burris. Got another Simmons in trade a few guns back, and replaced it before I even shot it. I'm waiting for an excuse to get either a new Redfield or a Bushnell Elite.
crm3006
You are correct, sir. Some of the early Simmons and Tasco scopes were pretty fair pieces of glass. Some of them are actually very good. The fact that they outsourced the manufacturing from one outfit to the other led to quality issues and crummy reputations. I think that a blanket statement that all (fill in the blank) scopes are crap is not entirely accurate for a lot of the long time brands. Look at Weaver for example. Some of them were the best available many years ago and then fell into the offshore abyss. Same with Redfield. You just have to know what you are looking at (or through) and be able to tell quality from crap.
awsome scope
My dad has one of the first 4200's that came with the rain guard on top of a vintage S&W 308. The combination has proven very effective and reliable to say the least.
I have a fixed 4 power Banner on my 45-70 GG. I've worked some pretty heavy loads for for it in case I get Charged by a Cape Buff or and Elephant here in Bowling Green, Ohio. Anyways, with the rounds I put through it, it hasn't moved an bit. Got a nikon prostaff for my lh 25-06 which is great, but my next nice scope will be a Bushnell
Please tell me it's not made in China!
All the bells and whitsels are just that, the more junk you got on a scoe the more problems you got.S for Simmons, Tasco, they should be trashed, o at least mine. I got both and just waitig till I get a trad-in that needs a scope to sell, and the lot of them goes. My # 1 choice is Nikon 3 x 9 x 40 or the new nikon 2.5 x 12 x 42. I have thoe o all my rocky mtns hunts on Rem.700's nd one Mauser custon job. My home guns, cheaper than the 700's all cary Bushnell Dusk to Dawn, even on my Black/Powder's guns.So far, no problem, I do like the 6" eye relief,as can mount forwar adn see the entirclecircle, regardless of the distance you hold. Plus Yoou can get l0-15min of more shooting early and late. I tried the lK to l500.00 scopes and not equal to the Nikons. The Nikons now made in Spain, not Japan, not cheap,but mid-range at about 500.00. So will stick with what I got and leave the trouble makers on the shelves.Always varya extra scope and rings what-eve scope you use. As the baggage handlers try their best to break the gun case in l/2 . Bought a l75.00 cae with dbe lining and you would have thought it ws dropped from 40.000 ft/ but the Nikon Scopes held ther zero. Oe lst thing,I use Leupold Dual Dove tail on all my scoped guns. Once zeroed, it stayes zeroed.
Yesterday the UPS guy delivered a Bushnell Banner 4X scope from my friend Happy Myles. He donated the scope for Wesley. Last night I coated the lens with some stuff that prevents fogging and coated the outside with ultraguncoat. Next I mounted the scope on a new CVA Wolf 50 cal in-line that Bill Evans donated for Wesley. This morning at the range that combination knocked my socks off. With 2-50 grain white hot pellets and a 295 grain powerbelt bullet this gun will shoot the lights out. I put 6 bullets into a group that was all touching in one oblong hole at 100 yds. Velocity averaged 1550 fps which was about 100 fps faster than pyrodex pellets and more accurate. Naturally I took a pic of the target. I have considered Bushnell scopes to be junk all these years but not anymore.
Dell in KS what is the name of that stuff you put on the lenses and where did you purchase? I been wanting to try something along that order myself. If it works on windshields,should work on guns. I got a Wolf and a Huntrbolt and Bushnell Dusk to Dawn scopes,(I use Nikons on my western guns and the rifles i use here. I use different guns for each place. last 2 yrs the B/P's killed 7 deer with l shot. I use the 2 45 gr Pyrodex Pointed and 100 grs of Pyrodex. I;m looking at a Traditions Yukon and a Pursuit (changeable bbls), like both, but kinda leaning to the latter due to 4" longer bbl and it' tappered.Never cared for B/P till about 4 yrs ago, but nt got the fever. I'd like to try MT for the B/P season during the rut.
Gunslinger, The stuff I used was very simular to the raincoat 2 finish on new Bushnell scopes. I got it from Bill Evans at ultracoatingsinc. Don't recall what he called it but it is good stuff. I put a coat on my truck windshield and rain beads and runs off. Lasts much longer than rainX too. You can reach Bill at www.ultracoatingsinc.com. Tell him I sent you and he will know what it is you need.
My brother had gave me one of these. I think he had paid $675 on Amazon for it. Anyways...I've yet to test it out.
kinect x360
Looks like a neat scope but I buy gear for what I use it for most. منتديات I dont shoot long range much but like to be able to if required. مسجات You can never go wrong on buying quality, وسائط and the gun/scope I thought was big money seems a deal 20 years later and still perfect and even better deal when you can pass it on and its still top quality. توبيكات The gear you cheap out on can cost you big time if it fails when you need it most. Find out your x hairs are moving on a wilderness hunt and no iron sights on your gun makes that few dollars you saved initially seem stupid. And how many shots did you blow before you realized the scope was garbage? Tough lessons so learn them from the aged ones, its cheaper that way. ماسنجر Had scope with lit reticle but if its so dark you cant see x hairs in good scope you dont want to be shooting and turning the light on seemed worse as the background appeared darker. Just my experience.
I have had em for many years now and have never had any trouble of any sort. You'll be very satisfied if you get one of these.
Work from home
For some reason you have to keep them lubricated or else the trigger gets stuck...maybe its only mine doing that.
Ulysse Nardin
These are sounding more and more like advertisements and less like a blog or opinion piece.
Post a Comment